Possible Interactions between the Biosynthetic Pathways of Indole Glucosinolate and Auxin

Glucosinolates (GLS) are a group of plant secondary metabolites mainly found in Cruciferous plants, share a core structure consisting of a β-thioglucose moiety and a sulfonated oxime, but differ by a variable side chain derived from one of the several amino acids. These compounds are hydrolyzed upon cell damage by thioglucosidase (myrosinase), and the resulting degradation products are toxic to many pathogens and herbivores. Human beings use these compounds as flavor compounds, anti-carcinogens, and bio-pesticides. GLS metabolism is complexly linked to auxin homeostasis. Indole GLS contributes to auxin biosynthesis via metabolic intermediates indole-3-acetaldoxime (IAOx) and indole-3-acetonitrile (IAN). IAOx is proposed to be a metabolic branch point for biosynthesis of indole GLS, IAA, and camalexin. Interruption of metabolic channeling of IAOx into indole GLS leads to high-auxin production in GLS mutants. IAN is also produced as a hydrolyzed product of indole GLS and metabolized to IAA by nitrilases. In this review, we will discuss current knowledge on involvement of GLS in auxin homeostasis.


INTRODUCTION
Glucosinolates (GLS) are a group of secondary metabolites found almost exclusively in Brassicaceae (Agerbirk and Olsen, 2012). GLS are nitrogen and sulfur rich compounds, forming a twocomponent defense system (mustard oil bomb) with myrosinases against herbivores and microorganisms (Bones and Rossiter, 1996;Rask et al., 2000). Upon tissue damage by herbivores, the mustard oil bomb comes into action, where myrosinases hydrolyze GLS into different degradation products that are toxic to the enemy (Rask et al., 2000;Chen and Andreasson, 2001). Apart from plant defense, some of the GLS degradation products are physiologically significant in plant nutrition and growth regulation (Hull et al., 2000;Rask et al., 2000;Kutz et al., 2002;Grubb et al., 2004;Katz et al., 2015). GLS breakdown products are part of human consumption and health. For instance, some of the GLS metabolites give characteristic flavors to Brassica vegetables (cabbage, cauliflower, broccoli, etc.) and condiments (mustard, horseradish, wasabi, etc.); and some others such as sulforaphane, indole-3-carbinol and phenethyl isothiocyanate act as cancer-preventive agents (Zhang et al., 1994;Hecht, 2000;Nakajima et al., 2001;Keck and Finley, 2004;Hayes et al., 2008). Moreover, Brassica crops are used for crop rotation and/or biofumigation as certain GLS metabolites exhibit natural biopesticide properties (Gimsing and Kirkegaard, 2009).
Glucosinolates are evolutionarily younger and evolved from cyanogenic glucosides. Cyanogenic glucosides are widespread in planta, whereas GLS are restricted to the order Capparales and the genus Drypetes of Euphorbiaceae (Johnson et al., 2009). Cyanogenic glucosides and GLS do not coexist in plants, except for one species, Carica papaya that produces both phenylalaninederived cyanogenic glucosides and GLS (Bennett et al., 1997). Evolutionary link between cyanogenic glucosides and GLS is supported by having similarities in their biosynthesis such as amino acids as precursors and CYTOCHROME P450s (CYPs) as aldoxime metabolizing enzymes (Bak et al., 1998Hansen et al., 2001a;Naur et al., 2003).
Glucosinolates (GLS) are characterized by having a thioglucose moiety, a sulfonated oxime, and a side-chain derived from aliphatic, aromatic, or indole amino acids (Figure 1). Currently, more than 130 different GLS structures have been identified (Agerbirk and Olsen, 2015). GLS are biosynthesized from amino acids and stored in the vacuoles of specific laticiferlike sulfur-rich cells called S-cells localized in the phloem cap along the vasculature and the leaf margins (Koroleva et al., 2010). GLS hydrolyzing myrosinases are localized in myrosin cells and are spatially separated from GLS (Thangstad et al., 1991;Xue et al., 1993;Andreasson et al., 2001;Husebye et al., 2002). Biosynthesis and long-distance transport of GLS are critical for spatio-temporal distribution of the GLS in plants (Nour-Eldin et al., 2012;Andersen and Halkier, 2014;Jørgensen et al., 2015). In Arabidopsis, transport of GLS compounds is mediated by transporter proteins GTR1/NPF2.10 and GTR2/NPF2.11 (Nour-Eldin et al., 2012).

STRUCTURE AND CLASSIFICATION OF GLS
The typical chemical structure of GLS consists of β-Dglucopyranose residue linked via a sulfur atom to a (Z)-Nhydroximinosulfate ester plus a precursor amino acid derived R group (Figure 1). Based on the precursor amino acid and the types of modification to the variable R group, GLS can be classified into aromatic (phenylalanine or tyrosine), aliphatic (alanine, leucine, isoleucine, methionine, or valine), and indole GLS [tryptophan (TRP)] (Fahey et al., 2001;Agerbirk and Olsen, 2012). A list and structures of GLS can be found in an excellent review (Clarke, 2010).
Camalexin is a major phytoalexin found in specific group of Cruciferous plants including Arabidopsis (Glawischnig, 2007;Rauhut and Glawischnig, 2009;Bednarek et al., 2011). Camalexins are synthesized in response to fungal pathogens and play positive role in their resistance (Pedras et al., 2011).

AN OVERVIEW OF AUXIN BIOSYNTHESIS
IAA is proposed to be biosynthesized from two pathways, TRP-independent and TRP-dependent pathway (Woodward and Bartel, 2005;Chandler, 2009;Normanly, 2010). TRP-dependent IAA biosynthesis is considered as the main route of IAA biosynthesis in plants (Figure 3).

TRP-Independent Pathway
In the TRP-independent pathway, indole-3-glycerol phosphate or indole is the likely precursor, while the genes and enzymes involved in this pathway are still largely unknown (Ouyang et al., 2000;Zhang et al., 2008;Wang et al., 2015). Studies on TRP auxotrophic mutants that were unable to synthesize TRP revealed the existence of TRP-independent pathway (Baldi et al., 1991;Wright et al., 1991;Normanly et al., 1993;Ouyang et al., 2000;Tivendale et al., 2014). When TRP auxotrophic mutants in maize and Arabidopsis were fed with isotope-labeled anthranilate and TRP, IAA was more enriched than TRP, and the incorporation of the label into IAA from TRP was low, indicating occurrence of TRP-independent IAA biosynthesis (Wright et al., 1991;Normanly et al., 1993). The TRP biosynthetic mutants trp3 and trp2, defective in TRP SYNTHASE A and TRP SYNTHASE B subunits, respectively, accumulated higher levels of IAA than the wild-type despite containing lower TRP levels (Last et al., 1991;Normanly et al., 1993;Radwanski et al., 1996;Ouyang et al., 2000). Recently, INDOLE SYNTHASE was suggested to catalyze indole-3-glyceralphosphate in TRP-independent pathway and play essential role in embryo development (Zhang et al., 2008;Wang et al., 2015).

The TAM Pathway
In the TAM pathway, TRP DECARBOXYLASE (TDC) converts TRP to TAM. Moreover, TDCs were functionally characterized to participate in indole alkaloid and serotonin biosynthesis. For instance, transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing the TDC gene of Catharanthus roseus accumulated very high levels of TAM, whereas IAA levels were unaffected (Songstad et al., 1990). Hence, the TAM pathway is not considered as a major player of auxin biosynthesis.
It has been proposed that IAOx is channeled into biosynthesis of IAA via IAN (Hull et al., 2000;Nafisi et al., 2006;Sugawara et al., 2009). It is well demonstrated that CYP71A13 catalyzes IAOx to IAN, but this gene is mainly induced in response to pathogen infection to produce camalexin (Glawischnig, 2007). IAN levels were increased in CYP79B2 overexpressing plants, and cyp79B2/B3 double mutants showed reduced IAN content (Zhao et al., 2002). Metabolite feeding studies showed that IAM and IAN are likely produced from IAOx (Sugawara et al., 2009). When the IAOx-deficient cyp79b2/b3 double mutants supplied with 13 C 6 -labeled IAOx, 13 C 6 atoms were efficiently incorporated into IAM, IAN, and IAA, indicating that IAA can be produced from IAOx via IAM and IAN. In consistent with this, wild-type plants supplied with IAM and IAN showed auxin-overproduction phenotypes (Sugawara et al., 2009). When Arabidopsis CYP79B2 or CYP79B3 genes was ectopically expressed in tobacco, IAOx and IAN were identified as endogenous compounds in the transgenic plants together with elevated levels of IAA compared to their controls (Nonhebel et al., 2011).
In addition to being metabolized from IAOx, IAN is also produced from indole GLS by myrosinases (Halkier and Gershenzon, 2006). A tendency of IAN accumulation in accordance with turnover of glucobrassicin was observed in Arabidopsis (Müller and Weiler, 2000;Reintanz et al., 2001;Zhao et al., 2002). It has been reported that low concentration of IAN can induce a high-auxin phenotype in the Arabidopsis seedlings (Normanly et al., 1997). In maize, IAN was identified as an endogenous compound at lower magnitude than Arabidopsis, exogenously supplied IAN inhibited the root growth (Thimann, 1953;Park et al., 2003;Kriechbaumer et al., 2007). The altered auxin response in the root tips of Arabidopsis myrosinase double mutants tgg4 tgg5 was likely due to no IAN production from indole GLS under myrosinase disruption (Fu et al., 2016). In vivo conversion of IAN to IAA was observed in root tissue of Arabidopsis (Müller et al., 1998).
Nitrilases (NITs) are proposed to catalyze IAN to IAA (Bartling et al., 1992;Bartel and Fink, 1994;Normanly et al., 1997;Pollmann et al., 2002). Early studies assayed NIT enzyme activities from members of plant families including Cruciferae, Gramineae, and Musaceae Thimann and Mahadevan, 1964). Arabidopsis genome contains four NITs named NIT1-NIT4, categorized into NIT4 and NIT1-subfamilies. The members of NIT1-subfamily, NIT1-3, were suggested to be emerged from phylogenetically older NIT4-subfamily by gene duplication events and subsequent neo-functionalization (Piotrowski, 2008). Transgenic plants overexpressing each of NIT1-3 were more sensitive to exogenously supplied IAN (Schmidt et al., 1996;Dohmoto et al., 2000a,b), whereas nit mutants were tolerant (Normanly et al., 1997). Increased NIT activity was appeared to alter levels of IAN and free IAA in NIT1 overexpressing transgenic Arabidopsis plants (Lehmann et al., 2017). In maize, loss-offunction of ZmNIT2, a homolog of AtNIT4, caused the mutants less sensitive to IAN with significantly lower amounts of total IAA in kernels and roots of young seedlings compared to wild-type plants (Kriechbaumer et al., 2007). NIT3 was proposed to catalyze IAN to IAA in sulfur deprived Arabidopsis roots (Kutz et al., 2002). In Brassica plants, development of root galls caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae infection appeared to be mediated by IAN-derived IAA (Grsic et al., 1999;Grsic-Rausch et al., 2000;Ishikawa et al., 2007).
Apart from several lines of supporting evidence, the role of NITs in IAA biosynthesis is still arguable (Piotrowski, 2008). It was shown that these enzymes have lesser substrate preference to IAN than the compounds including phenylpropionitrile, allylcyanide, phenylthio acetonitrile, and methylthio acetonitriles raising doubt on the role of these enzymes in IAA biosynthesis (Vorwerk et al., 2001). The substrate preference of NITs would be different if the enzymes were challenged with IAN as a predominant substrate (Pollmann et al., 2002). For instance, in the roots of sulfur-deprived plants, expression of NIT3 was strongly induced in response to intensified turnover of IAN precursor glucobrassicin and was suggested to metabolize IAA (Kutz et al., 2002). Additionally, in planta NITs were shown to much more efficient than the recombinant ones. For example, Arabidopsis NIT2 ectopically overexpressed in tobacco was able to convert IAN supplied at micromolar concentrations, 15fold below the enzyme's apparent in vitro K m (Schmidt et al., 1996). In the absence of exogenous IAN, neither the nit mutants nor NIT overexpressors showed severe auxin phenotypes, and endogenous IAN and IAA levels were not clearly distinguishable (Normanly et al., 1997). NIT1 overexpressors displayed strong reduction in their primary root length with clearly elevated levels of free IAA and IAN, while nit1-3 mutant displayed wild-type like roots with reduced total IAA levels (Lehmann et al., 2017). The cyp79b2/b3 mutants that are deficient in glucobrassicin have strongly reduced levels of IAN (Zhao et al., 2002), however, are not affected in infection rates of P. brassicae and consequent root gall development (Siemens et al., 2008). The role of NITs in the development of clubroot was also questioned, as cyp79b2/b3 mutants with low levels of IAN showed normal clubroot symptoms (Siemens et al., 2008). The involvement of indole GLS and NITs in the development of clubroot disease is seemingly more complicated. For instance, the transcripts of BnCYP83B1 and BnNit4 were up-regulated in the infected root of Brassica napus (Xu et al., 2016), whereas CYP83B1 and other GLS biosynthesis genes CYP79B2/B3 and CYP83A1 were differentially downregulated during different stages of infection in Brassica macrocarpa . Hence, further studies are needed to understand this phenomenon. The role of IAN as a direct metabolite of IAOx and the involvement of NITs in IAA biosynthesis was argued, because the high-auxin phenotype of sur2 is not rescued in the nit1 genetic background . The mutant impaired with all NITs would exclude the possible redundancy of NIT activity and gives conclusive idea on the contribution of NITs in IAA biosynthesis.

REGULATION OF GLS BIOSYNTHESIS Transcriptional Control of GLS Biosynthesis
Various Transcription Factors (TFs) are known to regulate GLS biosynthesis at transcriptional level. Of which, some TFs have been shown to control GLS production at global level. For instance, IQD1 positively affected production of both aliphatic and indole GLS. The gain-and loss-of-function of IQD1 led to increased and decreased accumulation of GLS, respectively (Levy et al., 2005). SLIM1, an EIN3-like TF, involved in sulfur deficiency response, was shown to repress the expression of GLS biosynthetic genes (Maruyama-Nakashita et al., 2006;. AtDOF1.1 was reported to promote GLS production (Skirycz et al., 2006). Finally, TFL2, an Arabidopsis homolog of HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN1, was shown to affect GLS biosynthesis (Kim et al., 2004;Bennett et al., 2005).
R2R3-MYBs constitute the largest MYB gene family in plants, characterized by possessing two repeats of DNA binding domains named R2 and R3 at the N-terminal end, and an activation or repression domain usually located at the C-terminus (Stracke et al., 2001). These TFs involve in various processes including development, metabolism and stress response (Chezem and Clay, 2016). Members of sub-group 12 R2R3-MYB are specific regulators of GLS biosynthesis: MYB34, MYB51, and MYB122 control indole GLS production, whereas MYB28, MYB29, and MYB76 regulate aliphatic GLS biosynthesis (Gigolashvili et al., 2009).
MYB28 is characterized as a dominant regulator of aliphatic GLS, whereas MYB29 and MYB76 are suggested to play additional accessory role. Overexpression of these MYBs has been shown to induce aliphatic GLS biosynthetic genes and aliphatic GLS content (Gigolashvili et al., 2007b(Gigolashvili et al., , 2008Hirai et al., 2007;Sønderby et al., 2007). Consistently, loss-of-function of MYB28 affected production of both short-and long-chain derived aliphatic GLS. However, myb29 and myb76 were defective in accumulation of only short-chain derived aliphatic GLS albeit to a lesser extent in myb76 (Hirai et al., 2007;Sønderby et al., 2007;Beekwilder et al., 2008;Gigolashvili et al., 2008), indicating dominance of MYB28 over other two MYBs in controlling aliphatic GLS production. In line with this, expression of aliphatic GLS biosynthetic genes was greatly affected in myb28 than in myb29 (Gigolashvili et al., 2007b(Gigolashvili et al., , 2008Hirai et al., 2007;Sønderby et al., 2007). Additionally, disruption of both MYB28 and MYB29 showed complete reduction of aliphatic GLS levels in myb28 myb29 double mutants (Sønderby et al., 2007;Beekwilder et al., 2008). This shows that MYB28 controls both short-and long-chain derived aliphatic GLS, while MYB29 and MYB76 regulate only the short-chain derived aliphatic GLS. However, Sønderby et al. (2010a) showed that MYB29 and MYB76 were able to regulate the production of long-chain derived aliphatic GLS in the genetic backgrounds of myb28 myb76 and myb28 myb29, respectively, suggesting interplay of MYBs in controlling GLS biosynthesis. Aliphatic biosynthetic genes were differentially transactivated by these MYBs, though MYB28 showed highest transactivation potential over the two MYBs (Gigolashvili et al., 2007b(Gigolashvili et al., , 2008. For instance, MAML was strongly transactivated by MYB28 than MYB29; CYP79F2 was greatly transactivated by MYB28 and MYB29 but to a less extent by MYB76 (Gigolashvili et al., 2008). Additionally, the transcript levels of aliphatic biosynthetic genes were uncoupled from the levels of GLS metabolites in the myb28, myb29, and myb76 knockouts (Sønderby et al., 2010a). These reports suggest that a complex network of MYB28, MYB29, and MYB76 controls the aliphatic GLS biosynthesis specifically and coordinately.
MYB34/ATR1 was initially identified as a regulator of TRP biosynthesis as it controls the expression of TRP biosynthetic gene ASA1 (Bender and Fink, 1998). The expression of indole GLS biosynthetic genes CYP79B2/B3 and CYP83B1/SUR2 were altered in myb34 mutants, and transcript levels of MYB34 were reduced in atr4/cyp83B1/sur2, indicating its involvement in GLS biosynthesis (Smolen and Bender, 2002). The plants constitutively overexpressing MYB34 accumulated 10-fold higher indole GLS compared to their control plants. Conversely, myb34 knockouts displayed low indole GLS with reduced transcript levels of indole GLS biosynthetic genes . Similar to MYB34, both MYB51 and MYB122 positively regulated indole GLS production. Metabolite analysis showed increase of indole GLS levels in the plants overexpressing MYB51 and MYB122, and decrease in myb51 and myb122 knockouts (Gigolashvili et al., 2007a). Thus, MYB34, MYB51, and MYB122 positively regulate indole GLS production.
Because CYP79B2/B3 can convert TRP to IAOx, and the expression of CYP79B2/B3 is regulated by MYB34, MYB51, and MYB122, it is possible that production of other IAOx derived metabolites including IAA, camalexin and indole-3-carboxylic acids may also be regulated by these MYB genes. Indeed, it was reported that MYB34, MYB51, and MYB122 could show a conditional and probably indirect impact on the biosynthesis of camalexin and indole-3-carbolic acids (Frerigmann et al., 2015. Moreover, elevated IAA levels were found in MYB34, and MYB122 overexpression lines Gigolashvili et al., 2007a), suggesting a potential role of these TFs in auxin homeostasis.
Recently, it has been shown that bHLH04, bHLH05, and bHLH06 genes of sub-group IIIe of bHLH TF family take part in GLS biosynthesis together with R2R3-MYBs (Schweizer et al., 2013;. bHLH06/MYC2 was shown to negatively regulate indole GLS biosynthesis, as levels of indole GLS were increased in bhlh06/myc2 mutants (Dombrecht et al., 2007). However, it was later shown that bHLH06, bHLH04, and bHLH05 positively regulate indole GLS biosynthesis, as the triple mutants had reduced levels of indole GLS (Schweizer et al., 2013;. bHLH06 bound directly to the G-box motif in the promoters of GLS biosynthetic genes (Schweizer et al., 2013). Moreover, MYB-bHLH interactions can play essential role in controlling GLS biosynthesis. For instance, the reduction of indole GLS levels was more pronounced in myb51 bhlh05 plants than bhlh05 single mutants. In line with this, double gain-of-function mutants myb34-1D bhlh05D94 had 20-fold more indole GLSs than their single mutants and wildtype plants . These findings suggest that MYB and bHLH TFs play critical roles in regulating indole GLS biosynthesis.

Hormonal Control of GLS Biosynthesis
Glucosinolates biosynthesis is regulated by various phytohormones, including jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene, salicylic acid (SA), and brassinosteroids (BRs) Guo et al., 2013). JA is a well characterized stress signaling molecule known to integrate plant response to various environmental cues, and is involved in a wide variety of plant processes (Turner et al., 2002;Koo and Howe, 2009). JA and its precursors and derivatives collectively called as jasmonates (JAs). They are shown to induce various TFs that are involved in secondary metabolite production (Memelink et al., 2001). JAs signaling involves perception of JAs by F-box protein CORONATINE INSENSITIVE1 (COI1) protein of Skp-Cullin-F-box protein complex (SCFCOI1) that facilitates ubiquitin-26S proteasome mediated degradation of transcriptional repressors called JAZ (Jasmonate ZIM domain). JAZ proteins interact with and repress a variety of TFs; this repression is released upon JAZ degradation via JAs signaling. As JAZ proteins are known to repress sub-group IIIe of bHLH TFs, to inhibit interaction between MYB-bHLH (Chini et al., 2007), these proteins play critical role in controlling GLS biosynthesis in a JAs dependent manner. It was found that the interaction strength between bHLH-MYB proteins could affect the interaction between bHLH-JAZ proteins. An amino acid substitution in bHLH05 weakens its interaction with JAZ protein  allowing the bHLH05 to induce indole GLS biosynthesis. Exogenous JAs treatment induced GLS biosynthetic genes and GLS content in various plant species (Brader et al., 2001;Gigolashvili et al., 2008;De Geyter et al., 2012). Therefore, MYB-bHLH interactions may play a crucial role in JAs responsive GLS biosynthesis.
Salicylic acid differentially regulates GLS biosynthesis. SA treatment has been shown to induce nearly all types of GLS, of which, 2-phenylethyl GLS showed highest accumulation in oilseed rape (Kiddle et al., 1994). In Arabidopsis, 4-methoxyglucobrassicin was reported to be induced by SA, while the contents of glucobrassicin and neoglucobrassicin were decreased . Increased SA production in mpk4 and cpr1 induced 50% more GLS accumulation in the mutants compared to wild-type plants .
Glucosinolates production is negatively regulated by BR. Microarray analysis of BR-responsive genes showed that CYP79B2 was down-regulated by BR treatment in Arabidopsis (Goda et al., 2002). BR treatment reduced accumulation of both aliphatic and indole GLS. The inhibitory role of BR was confirmed by significantly higher accumulation of GLS content in BR-deficient mutant cpd, whereas transgenic plant overexpressing BR biosynthetic gene DWF4 showed dramatically reduced GLS levels (Guo et al., 2013). In another study, binding sites of BZR1 were identified in the promoters of MYB34 and MYB51 (Sun et al., 2010). Hence, it has been suggested that BR induced inhibition of GLS biosynthesis may be mediated by BR signaling TFs BZR1 and BES1 by binding directly to GLS biosynthetic genes or indirectly by interacting with MYB factors (Guo et al., 2013).
Further, ethylene has also been shown to induce the expression of GLS biosynthetic genes and their regulators . Broccoli florets treated with ethylene were found to have higher quantities of specific indole GLS (Villarreal-Garcia et al., 2016). It was reported that abscisic acid (ABA) can also induce indole GLS biosynthesis .
The distinct roles of indole GLS biosynthesis regulators MYB34, MYB51, and MYB122 in response to the phytohormones have been reported . MYB34 was found to mediate ABA-and JA-induced indole GLS production. ABA and JA treatments strongly induced indole GLS biosynthesis in myb51 and myb122 but this tendency was not observed in myb34 mutants. Ethylene/SA induced accumulation of indole GLS was highly affected in myb51 than in myb34 and myb122, indicating a potential role of MYB51 in indole GLS synthesis in response to the treatment of these two hormones. MYB122 has been suggested to play a minor role in ethylene/JA induced GLS biosynthesis Frerigmann, 2016).
Hormonal cross-talks in controlling GLS biosynthesis were also suggested. For example, methyl-JA induced specific indole GLS accumulation was significantly decreased in SAoverproducing mutant cpr1 than in wild-type, indicating suppression of methyl-JA induced GLS biosynthesis by SA . In Brassica rapa, SA antagonistically affected methyl-JA induced GLS accumulation in the root regardless of the site of elicitation. Similar effect was found in the leaves when the roots were elicited, however, the effect was synergetic if the leaves were elicited (Zang et al., 2015).

GLS METABOLISM IS A MODULATOR OF AUXIN HOMEOSTASIS
Some of the GLS mutants were isolated from the genetic screens aimed to identify genes involved in auxin homeostasis in Arabidopsis. For instance, sur1 was isolated in a screen designed to identify mutants with high-auxin phenotypes including small and epinastic cotyledons, an elongated hypocotyl, excess adventitious and lateral roots, and a reduced number of leaves (Boerjan et al., 1995). The different alleles of sur1, alf1, rty, and hsl3, which encodes a C-S lyase, identified in independent root morphology screens, also showed high-auxin related abnormal root morphology (Celenza et al., 1995;King et al., 1995;Lehman et al., 1996). Later, sur2 and rnt1, loss-of-function mutants of CYP83B1, were found to display the phenotypes similar to sur1 (Delarue et al., 1998;Winkler et al., 1998;Barlier et al., 2000;. UGT74B1 encodes a UDP-glucose:thiohydroximate S-glycosyltransferase. Insertional mutations in UGT74B1 resulted in phenotypes reminiscent of auxin overproduction, such as epinastic cotyledons, elongated hypocotyls in light grown plants (Grubb et al., 2004).
The GLS mutants with high-auxin phenotypes were found to have altered levels of IAA along with impaired GLS content. In sur1/rty, free and conjugated IAA levels were over accumulated (Boerjan et al., 1995;King et al., 1995) with undetectable levels of all types of GLS . Similarly, the mutants of UGT74B1 having excess free and conjugated IAA were associated with reduction in all types of GLS compared to their control plants (Grubb et al., 2004). Indole GLS production was reduced to 50% in sur2 plants  compared to wild-type, whereas free IAA levels were increased at all developmental stages tested (Delarue et al., 1998). cyp79f1/bushy1/sps mutants showed extremely bushy phenotype (Reintanz et al., 2001;Tantikanjana et al., 2001). cyp79f1 mutant showed decreased levels of shortchain derived GLS but increased levels of indole-3-ylmethyl-GLS, IAA (Reintanz et al., 2001), and cytokinin (Tantikanjana et al., 2001). Because the cytokinin responsive reporter ARR5::uidA and auxin responsive reporter DR5::uidA in the cyp79f1 mutant showed that increased levels of cytokinin, but not auxin, correlate well with a root-specific expression pattern, the bushy phenotype might be caused by increased level of cytokinin (Tantikanjana et al., 2004). Both auxin and cytokinin can influence the hormone levels of each other. Increased cytokinin levels in cyp79f1 might induce accumulation of auxin. Alternatively, increased indole GLS production in cyp79f1 likely increased IAA biosynthesis . CYP79B2/B3 were up-regulated in stressed plants, resulting in increased indole GLS and IAA . Therefore, it is also possible that sps/cyp79f1 mutants were stressed because of the perturbation of cytokinin homeostasis, which in turn up-regulates CYP79B2/B3 genes (Tantikanjana et al., 2004).
The altered IAA levels found in the GLS mutants were proposed to be synthesized from IAOx (Hull et al., 2000), a common precursor for indole GLS, camalexin, and IAA (Figure 3). The CYP71 clade genes SUR2/CYP83B1 and CYP71A13/12 channel IAOx into biosynthesis of indole GLS and camalexin, respectively. SUR2 catalyzes IAOx into an indole-3-Salkyl-thiohydroximate and is subsequently metabolized to indole GLS .
Indole-3-acetaldoxime channeling into production of either IAA, or secondary metabolites indole GLS or camalexin must be tightly controlled. In CYP79B2 overexpressing plants, elevated IAOx has been found to be channeled into biosynthesis of indole GLS (Mikkelsen et al., 2000) and IAA (Zhao et al., 2002). In response to the increased production of IAA in CYP79B2 overexpressors, transcripts of IAA-inducible genes including IAA/AUX, SAUR, and GH3s were induced (Zhao et al., 2002). Consistently, disruption of CYP79B2/B3 abolished production of indole GLS, and affected rate of IAA biosynthesis in the mutants (Zhao et al., 2002). CYP79B2 was shown to highly express in response to silver nitrate treatment that induces camalexin synthesis. Consistently, cyp79B2 single and cyp79B2/B3 double mutants were unable to synthesize camalexin under induced conditions (Glawischnig et al., 2004;Ljung et al., 2005). In the absence of pathogen attack, IAN levels were not altered in cyp71A13 knockout mutants (Sugawara et al., 2009), indicating fine-tuned regulation of IAOx metabolic channeling into the corresponding pathways. Loss-of-function mutations of SUR2 restricted IAOx flux into biosynthesis of indole GLS, resulting in decreased indole GLS production  and increased free IAA levels (Delarue et al., 1998). In agreement with the elevated free IAA levels, sur2 disruption induced transcription of early auxin responsive genes such as Aux/IAAs and GH3s (Mikkelsen et al., 2009;Morant et al., 2010). Conversely overexpression of SUR2 led to increased production of indole GLS . It was shown that TAM can competitively inhibit SUR2 that resulted in conversion of IAOx into IAA . These studies indicate that IAOx plays important roles in plant development and defense responses as a branch point for biosynthesis of indole GLS, camalexin, and IAA.
Differential activation of IAOx pathway resulted in altered auxin homeostasis in post-acetaldoxime mutants or overexpressors of CYP79B2 . For instance, in sur2, increased endogenous IAA levels were associated with up-regulation of CYP79B2, IAA conjugation genes such as GH3s (Morant et al., 2010), and subsequent accumulation of IAA catabolites such as IAA-aspartate and oxindole-3-acetic acid (Barlier et al., 2000). Consistently, IAA-leucine resistant 1-like family of amidohydrolases ILL1 and ILL2 which release IAA from amide conjugates were down-regulated indicating that increased IAA levels were catalyzed to irreversible conjugates in sur2 plants (Morant et al., 2010). Similar to sur2 plants, overexpression of CYP79B2 induced expression of auxin responsive genes and increased accumulation of IAN (Zhao et al., 2002). It appears that impaired aliphatic GLS production indirectly affects production of IAOx derived indole GLS and IAA levels, as demonstrated by upregulation of CYP79B2/B3 genes in CYP79F1 co-suppressed plants (Hansen et al.,200lb), and increased accumulation of indole-3-ylmethyl-GLS, IAA in cyp79f1 mutant (Reintanz et al., 2001). Nevertheless, the increased IAA levels in cyp79f1 mutants may not be responsible for the bushy phenotype.
It was shown that cyp79b2/b3 double mutants displayed wildtype like IAA levels under normal growth conditions, but showed a modest decrease of free IAA levels under high temperature (Zhao et al., 2002;Sugawara et al., 2009). Overexpression of CYP79B2 significantly elevated levels of indole GLS and IAN but with normal IAA levels (Zhao et al., 2002). It was suggested that CYP79B2/B3 were primarily responsible for production of secondary metabolites GLS and camalexin (Glawischnig et al., 2004). These observations question whether IAOx pathway can contribute to basal IAA production, and its role in regulating plant growth and development.
Besides this, potential involvement of IAOx pathway in certain circumstances is well documented. It has been proposed that root growth under sulfur starvation is initiated by extra IAA produced from IAN (Kutz et al., 2002). IAA produced from IAOx and IPA-pathways has been shown to involve in PIF4 mediated hypocotyl elongation in response to high temperature (Franklin et al., 2011). The expression of TAA1 and CYP79B2 genes were induced in response to high temperature, however, their expression was greatly reduced in pif4-101 mutants (Franklin et al., 2011). Similarly, IAOx and IPA pathways were shown to be hyperactive during high temperature induced microsporogenesis as demonstrated by tremendous increase of transcripts of NIT2 and TAA1 (Rodríguez-Sanz et al., 2015). Recently, it has been demonstrated that miR10515 promotes IAA biosynthesis via IAOx pathway under high temperature by suppressing SUR1 (Kong et al., 2015). Overexpression of miR10515 partially phenocopied sur1 phenotype with repressed SUR1 expression and elevated IAA concentration. NIT3 expression was strongly induced or repressed in the miR10515 overexpressing and silenced plants, respectively (Kong et al., 2015). Low auxin phenotype of cyp79b2/b3 double mutants appeared only in high temperature grown plants (Zhao et al., 2002). These reports suggest that IAOx pathway may provide extra auxin in response to environmental stresses.
It was reported that upregulation of the IAOx pathway can compensate defects in the IPA pathway (Stepanova et al., 2008). The elevated IAA in sur2 plants had attenuated the meristem maintenance and lateral root formation defects of TAA1 and TAR2 double mutants wei8 tar2. Additionally, dwarf phenotypes of sur2/rty1 were alleviated in wei8 tar2 sur2 and wei8 tar2 rty1 genetic backgrounds suggesting an existence of a functional overlap between the IPA-and IAOx-dependent routes of auxin biosynthesis (Stepanova et al., 2008). Developmental defects in ASA1/WEI2 mutants were suppressed by excess IAA levels accumulated in sur1 and sur2 mutants, respectively (Stepanova et al., 2005). These findings indicate that IAOx pathway may be operative under normal growth conditions as well; however, further studies are needed to confirm this idea. Regardless of how significant this pathway is in controlling plant growth and development, endogenous IAOx and its metabolizing enzymes CYP79B2/B3 were found only in GLS plants. Thus, IAOx pathway is considered as a species-specific pathway (Sugawara et al., 2009).

CONCLUSION
Biosynthetic pathways of indole GLS, camalexin and IAA are metabolically connected by their common metabolic intermediate IAOx. Disruption of indole GLS production leads to altered auxin homeostasis via differential activation of IAOx pathway. Physiological role of NITs in IAA biosynthesis is so far not conclusive. Our current knowledge on IAOx pathway suggests that this pathway is likely operative under special circumstances. Identification of the enzyme responsible for conversion of IAOx to IAA, and its functional characterization under normal and induced conditions would help us to better understand the role of this pathway in plant development.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.