%A Lee,Jun Hyung %A Mazarei,Mitra %A Pfotenhauer,Alexander C. %A Dorrough,Aubrey B. %A Poindexter,Magen R. %A Hewezi,Tarek %A Lenaghan,Scott C. %A Graham,David E. %A Stewart,C. Neal %D 2020 %J Frontiers in Plant Science %C %F %G English %K CRISPR/Cas9,Genome editing,bisulfite sequencing,DNA Methylation,Epigenetic change,CRISPR %Q %R 10.3389/fpls.2019.01720 %W %L %M %P %7 %8 2020-January-31 %9 Original Research %+ C. Neal Stewart,Jr.,Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee,United States,nealstewart@utk.edu %+ C. Neal Stewart,Jr.,Center for Agricultural Synthetic Biology, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture,United States,nealstewart@utk.edu %# %! Epigenetic footprints in plant genome editing %* %< %T Epigenetic Footprints of CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Plants %U https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2019.01720 %V 10 %0 JOURNAL ARTICLE %@ 1664-462X %X CRISPR/Cas9 has been widely applied to various plant species accelerating the pace of plant genome editing and precision breeding in crops. Unintended effects beyond off-target nucleotide mutations are still somewhat unexplored. We investigated the degree and patterns of epigenetic changes after gene editing. We examined changes in DNA methylation in genome-edited promoters of naturally hypermethylated genes (AT1G72350 and AT1G09970) and hypomethylated genes (AT3G17320 and AT5G28770) from Arabidopsis. Transgenic plants were developed via Agrobacterium-mediated floral dip transformation. Homozygous edited lines were selected from segregated T2 plants by an in vitro digestion assay using ribonucleoprotein complex. Bisulfite sequencing comparisons were made between paired groups of edited and non-edited plants to identify changes in DNA methylation of the targeted loci. We found that directed mutagenesis via CRISPR/Cas9 resulted in no unintended morphological or epigenetic alterations. Phenotypes of wild-type, transgenic empty vector, and transgenic edited plants were similar. Epigenetic profiles revealed that methylation patterns of promoter regions flanking target sequences were identical among wild-type, transgenic empty vector, and transgenic edited plants. There was no effect of mutation type on epigenetic status. We also evaluated off-target mutagenesis effects in the edited plants. Potential off-target sites containing up to 4-bp mismatch of each target were sequenced. No off-target mutations were detected in candidate sites. Our results showed that CRISPR/Cas9 did not leave an epigenetic footprint on either the immediate gene-edited DNA and flanking DNA or introduce off-target mutations.