Corrigendum: New Insights Into the Plastome Evolution of the Millettioid/Phaseoloid Clade (Papilionoideae, Leguminosae)

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00151.].

In the original article, there was a mistake in the legend for Table 1 as published. The use of "C. gracilis" in the h legend is incorrect. The correct legend appears below.
In the original article, there was a mistake in Supplementary Figure S1 as published. The mistakes were: Cochlianthus gracilis and Craspedolobium schochii.
Inserted CORRECTED names: Philenoptera violacea and Spatholobus sp. respectively. In the original article, there was a mistake in Supplementary Figure S2 as published. The mistakes were: Cochlianthus gracilis and Craspedolobium schochii.
Inserted CORRECTED names: Philenoptera violacea and Spatholobus sp., respectively. In the original article, there was a mistake in Supplementary Figure S3 as published. The mistakes were: Cochlianthus gracilis and Craspedolobium schochii.
Inserted CORRECTED names: Philenoptera violacea and Spatholobus sp., respectively. In the original article, there was a mistake in Supplementary Table S1 as published. The mistakes were: Cochlianthus gracilis and Craspedolobium schochii.
Inserted CORRECTED names: Philenoptera violacea and Spatholobus sp. have been inserted to replace the initial names respectively.
In the original article, there was a mistake in Supplementary In the original article, there was an error: C. gracilis. A correction has been made to Section: Results, Sub-section Plastome Structural Variations in the MP Clade.
In the original article, there was an error: However, the lineage consisting of Butea monosperma (Lam.) Kuntze and Craspedolobium schochii Harms has different phylogenetic position in trees of CP and NCDs, and that of CDs, but both relationships were weakly supported. Also, the tribe Desmodieae was weakly supported to be monophyletic in CDs, but being weakly supported to be paraphyletic in CP and NCDs. The tribe Indigofereae was strongly supported as sister to the remainder of the MP clade (BS = 100%, and PP = 1.0). Based on the current sampling, it is not sure if the tribe Desmodieae is monophyletic, while the tribes Millettieae and Phaseoleae appear non-monophyletic. correction has been made to Section: Results, Sub-section Phylogenetic Relationships of the MP Clade.
Inserted CORRECTED paragraph: However, the lineage consisting of Butea monosperma (Lam.) Kuntze and Spatholobus Hassk sp. has different phylogenetic position in trees of CP and NCDs, and that of CDs, but both relationships were weakly supported. Also, the tribe Desmodieae was weakly supported to be monophyletic in CP and NCDs data matrices whereas strongly supported by CDs data. The tribe Indigofereae was strongly supported as sister to the remainder of the MP clade (BS = 100%, and PP = 1.0). Based on the current sampling, it is not sure if the tribe Desmodieae is monophyletic, while the tribes Millettieae and Phaseoleae appear non-monophyletic.
In the original article, there was an error: According to this study, with the exception of the loss of the clpP introns 1 and 2 in a single species of S. vestita (Desmodieae) and the loss of ndh A and ndh B intron 1 in a single species of L. domingensis (Millettieae), two other introns (rps16 and rps12) have experienced multiple independent loss during the plastome evolution of the species from the MP clade. This finding agrees with the previous studies on the independent loss of rpsl2, rps16, and clpP introns in the MP clade (Guo et al., 2007;Schwarz et al., 2015;Kaila et al., 2016). A correction has been made to Section: Discussion, Sub-section Evolutionary Pattern of PSV in the MP Clade.
Inserted CORRECTED paragraph: According to this study, with the exception of the loss of the clpP introns 1 and 2 in a single species of S. vestita (Phaseoleae) and the loss of ndh A and ndh B intron 1 in a single species of L. domingensis (Millettieae), two other introns (rps16 and rps12) have experienced multiple independent loss during the plastome evolution of the species from the MP clade. This finding agrees with the previous studies on the independent loss of rpsl2, rps16, and clpP introns in the MP clade (Guo et al., 2007;Schwarz et al., 2015;Kaila et al., 2016). In the original article, there was an error: Desmodieae was supported as monophyletic group in previous studies (Bruneau et al., 1994;Doyle et al., 1997;Kajita et al., 2001;Stefanovic et al., 2009;Cardoso et al., 2013;de Queiroz et al., 2015;Egan et al., 2016), however this tribe was weakly supported as monophyletic by CDs but paraphyletic by CP and NCDs (Figure 4). A correction has been made to Section: Discussion, Sub-section Phylogenetic Relationships in the MP Clade.
In the original article, there was an error: Notably, our multilocus plastome data strongly supported (BS = 100%, PP = 1) the evolutionary position of S. vestita within the tribe Desmodieae, in contrast with previous placement in the tribe Phaseoleae (Lackey et al., 1981;de Queiroz et al., 2015). Formerly, the genus Shuteria was included in the tribe Phaseoleae based on flower structures shared with core Phaseoleae species (e.g., Amphicarpaea Elliott ex Nutt., Cologania Kunth, and Dumasia DC., Lackey et al., 1981). It is noteworthy that a similar phylogenetic placement in the MP clade has been shown from analysis based on the single plastid region matK (de Queiroz et al., 2015). Therefore, our phylogeny supports the placement of S. vestita within the tribe Desmodieae. A correction has been made to Section: Discussion, Sub-section Phylogenetic Relationships in the MP Clade.
CORRECTED paragraph: Notably, our multi-locus plastome data suggested (BS = 100%, PP = 1) the evolutionary position of S. vestita as sister to the tribe Desmodieae, in contrast with previous placement close to the subtribe Kennediinae of the tribe Phaseoleae (e.g., de Queiroz et al., 2015). Formerly, the genus Shuteria was included in the tribe Phaseoleae based on flower structures shared with core Phaseoleae species (e.g., Amphicarpaea Elliott ex Nutt., Cologania Kunth, and Dumasia DC., Lackey et al., 1981). It is noteworthy that a similar phylogenetic placement in the MP clade has been shown from analysis based on the single plastid region matK (de Queiroz et al., 2015). Therefore, our phylogeny supports the placement of S. vestita as sister to the tribe Desmodieae. Nevertheless, we expect that future phylogenetic studies would improve the understanding of the phylogenetic relationships of the genus Shuteria within the clade.