Approaches Involved in the Vegetable Crops Salt Stress Tolerance Improvement: Present Status and Way Ahead

Salt stress is one of the most important abiotic stresses as it persists throughout the plant life cycle. The productivity of crops is prominently affected by soil salinization due to faulty agricultural practices, increasing human activities, and natural processes. Approximately 10% of the total land area (950 Mha) and 50% of the total irrigated area (230 Mha) in the world are under salt stress. As a consequence, an annual loss of 12 billion US$ is estimated because of reduction in agriculture production inflicted by salt stress. The severity of salt stress will increase in the upcoming years with the increasing world population, and hence the forced use of poor-quality soil and irrigation water. Unfortunately, majority of the vegetable crops, such as bean, carrot, celery, eggplant, lettuce, muskmelon, okra, pea, pepper, potato, spinach, and tomato, have very low salinity threshold (ECt, which ranged from 1 to 2.5 dS m–1 in saturated soil). These crops used almost every part of the world and lakes’ novel salt tolerance gene within their gene pool. Salt stress severely affects the yield and quality of these crops. To resolve this issue, novel genes governing salt tolerance under extreme salt stress were identified and transferred to the vegetable crops. The vegetable improvement for salt tolerance will require not only the yield influencing trait but also target those characters or traits that directly influence the salt stress to the crop developmental stage. Genetic engineering and grafting is the potential tool which can improve salt tolerance in vegetable crop regardless of species barriers. In the present review, an updated detail of the various physio-biochemical and molecular aspects involved in salt stress have been explored.


INTRODUCTION
Nearly, three thousand species of plants are being utilized for the food by human; anyhow, presently, the total global population mainly depends mostly upon 20 species of crops for its major calorie needs from which 50% is contributed by eight cereal crop species . The insufficient availability of vegetables is mainly due to increasing population, abiotic (drought, salt, heat, water logging, etc.) and biotic (virus, viroids, bacteria, fungi, nematodes, and insects) stresses, which potentially reduce the production and quality of the vegetable crops (Ingram, 2011;Prasanna et al., 2015;Karkute et al., 2019;Krishna et al., 2021a,b;Singh et al., 2021;Soumia et al., 2021). The key challenge of modern agriculture is to fulfill the nutritional and food security of the global growing population. Among abiotic stresses, salt stress is the second most destructive stress as it persists throughout the crop life cycle. Salinity stress is one of the most important environmental constraints that limits the economic productivity of vegetable crops (Hong et al., 2021). Salinity in soil is influenced by a regular fluctuation in climatic conditions, irrigation of crops with low quality water, excessive use of ground water, and massive introduction of irrigation associated intensive farming (Tiwari et al., 2010). Further, prolonged water stress conditions in soil could result in increased salinity in soil profile due to lack of leaching rain, increased bore water salinity, and evaporation from irrigation dams. Vegetable crops are more prone to climatic changes compared with other horticultural crops (Giordano et al., 2021), and particularly, salinity stress influences the growth and development throughout their ontogeny. Salinity-induced oxidative stressed in vegetables could affect the qualitative and quantitative value of vegetables as this oxidative stress could lead to a plethora of biochemical and physiological changes in plants (Kashyap et al., 2020(Kashyap et al., , 2021. The most common of them include membrane damage, leakage of substances causing water imbalance and plasmolysis, disturbance in ROS detoxification system, changes in nutrient flux and dynamics, and photosynthetic attributes. These changes ultimately affect the physiological activities like respiration, photosynthesis, transpiration, hormonal regulation, water use efficiency, germination, production of antioxidants, and plasma membrane permeability (Chourasia et al., 2021). The most common approach adopted by plants during such extreme conditions is transcriptional reprogramming of stress responsive genes (Aamir et al., 2017;Tolosa and Zhang, 2020), although the conventional breeding approaches have helped a lot in developing stress-tolerant breeds of vegetables. However, we do not still have developed optimum solutions to prevent the economic losses of vegetables from salt stress, particularly, in intensively irrigated areas (Machado and Serralheiro, 2017). Transgenic technology for salt stress tolerance has been reported as one of the most crucial tool in developing the stress-tolerant vegetable crops . For example, to avoid salt tolerance in plants, genes encoding for proteins like Na + "exclusion" (PM-ATPases with SOS1 antiporter, and HKT1 transporter), vacuolar compartmentalization of Na + V-H + -ATPase and V-H + -PPase with NHX antiporter, and also other genes encoding proteins such as aquaporins and dehydrins that are involved in mitigation of water stress during salinity have been transferred and/or overexpressed in tomato or Arabidopsis through transgenic technology (Kotula et al., 2020). Since tomato is one of the most important vegetable crop and experimental model for molecular biology studies, most of the research done so far with respect to abiotic and biotic stresses have been done in tomato (Meena et al., 2016(Meena et al., , 2018Zehra et al., 2017a,b). For example, overexpression of LeNHX2 and SlSOS2 proteins resulted in salinity tolerance in tomato transgenic lines (Maach et al., 2021). The stress-responsive genes expressed during salinity stress and their fine-tuning could be an eminent tool for developing stress-resistant varieties.
On an average every year approximately 12 billion USD are lost worldwide due to the salinity stress which greatly affects the agriculture production (Zahedi et al., 2019). Almost 10% of the world's entire land area (950 Mha), 20% of the world's cultivated land (300 Mha), and approximately 50% of the total irrigated land (230 Mha) are consequently distressed with extreme salinity (Abiala et al., 2018).

SALT STRESS RESPONSES IN PLANTS
Important physiological and biochemical processes in plants are adversely affected by salinity in various ways through an intense concentration of salts and unavoidably leading to a gradual reduction in plant growth. High salt concentration in rhizosphere of plant cell causes osmotic effect, which remains as a chief contributor to growth reduction during the preliminary stages of a plant life cycle. Amendment in K + /Na + ratio arises when ions reach the plant cell through saline water, leading to augmented Na + and Cl − ion, inflicting extensive damage of numerous physiological processes like protein metabolism and enzyme activities (Tester and Davenport, 2003). The interactions between salts and essential mineral nutrients may consequently result in significant nutrient deficiencies and disproportion. Ionic imbalances may also result in decreased uptake of various significant minerals like potassium, manganese, and calcium to the plants. However, in response to ionic and nutrient imbalances, salt-tolerant plants have uniquely developed the capability of accumulation and compartmentalization of Na + and Cl − in their matured leaves, but sensitive species at absurdly high salinity stage cannot manage to compartmentalize the ions or Na + transport, leading to the ionic or osmotic effect. Considerable reduction in plant height has been documented under different abiotic stresses. Due to salinity, plants are exposed to serious water deficit conditions that reduces the leaf growth and leaf areas in several species such as wheat (Sacks et al., 1997), poplar (Wullschleger et al., 2005), and cowpea (Manivannan et al., 2007). One example of the physiological changes in response to salt is shedding of the older leaves of plants (Shao et al., 2008). The upsurge in root to shoot ratio due to salinity conditions was found to be associated with the ABA content of plants (Sharp and LeNoble, 2002). Plant productivity under salinity is strongly correlated with biomass distribution. reducing water loss from cuticle and stomata and maximized uptake of water by root to maintain the osmotic adjustment (Rai et al., 2021). Tolerance and adaptation to salt stress are governed by a cascade of molecular networks, which trigger response processes like production of stress proteins, upregulation of antioxidants, and accumulation of compatible solutes (Nahakpam and Shah, 2011) to provide homeostatic reestablishment of cells and to repair and protect the damaged membranes and proteins. On the basis of responses to salinity, plants are categorized as either halophytes or glycophytes (Flowers and Flowers, 2005). Under high saline conditions, glycophytes are unable to survive, whereas halophytes can easily grow and reproduce. Tissue tolerance and salt avoidance are two main approaches implemented by plants to overcome the salt stress. Plants also execute the compartmentalization of ions in the plant tissues. To regulate their osmotic pressure, plants continuously generate water-soluble and low molecular-weight compatible solutes like sugars, glycinebetaine, and proline and the metabolic processes of plants are not disturbed. Plants also produce many enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants to minimize the adverse effect of salinity. In the procedure of plant tissue tolerance, ions compartmentalization occurs in the vacuole, resulting in sustained salt concentration in cytosol, and thus the cytoplasm of the plant cell can be protected from water stress and ion toxicity (Chinnusamy et al., 2005).
To cope with salt stress many strategies have been evolved and developed to secure the vegetable yield under salt stress like transgenic development, regulation of transcription factors (TFs), and grafting. In this review, we have presented updated information on biotechnological interventions in vegetable crops for salt stress.

TRANSGENIC VEGETABLES FOR SALT STRESS TOLERANCE
Vegetables are the cheapest source of minerals, vitamins, antioxidative phytochemicals, and consumed all over the world in raw, semicooked, cooked, and/or in processed forms. Salt stress does not affect vegetable yield but it also affects the nutritional quality of the vegetables. Due to lack of novel salt tolerance in the gene in many vegetable crops gene pools, the transgene has been transferred from the non-parent sources like bacteria, fungi, plant, and animals. For developing transgenic vegetable crops, firstly gene is being identified, characterized, then transferred in the desired vegetables for salt stress. The transgene is being induced under salt stress and the upregulation or downregulation of transgenes initiates a cascade of stress regulatory phenomenon, which ultimately results in salt tolerance (Figure 1). Among vegetable crops, Solanaceous crops like potato, tomato, capsicum, and chili constitute major group of vegetables consumed all over the world, and out of these, potato is the most important and ranks third in the world in terms of economic importance and a key agriculture crop for food and nutritional security. Potato is cultivated globally and very sensitive to salt stress, and more than 60% crop loss is caused abiotic stresses including salt (Upadhyaya et al., 2011;Xu et al., 2014;Shafi et al., 2017). To improve potato yield and quality under salt stress condition, many transgenic potato plants have been developed using different genes with different modes of action (Shafi et al., 2017;Wang et al., 2019;Ali et al., 2020). Many osmoprotectant genes like P 5 CS, mtlD, and AtBADH have been transferred to potato, which significantly improves the salt tolerance under salt stress (Karthikeyan et al., 2011;Rahnama et al., 2011;Zhang et al., 2011). Like potato, tomato is the second most important vegetable fruit crop that belongs to the Solanaceae family and it is the highest processed crop in the world. Tomato is a rich source of proteins, minerals, carbohydrates, and vitamins, especially vitamin C. Tomato also contains many phytochemicals like carotenes and lycopenes which have anticancer properties and other health benefits (Krishna et al., 2021a,b;Rai et al., 2021). In tomato far salt stress tolerance, osmoprotectants genes like BADH-1, ToOsmotin, Ectoine (ectA, ectB, and ectC), and coda gene have been transformed in tomato, which reduces the impact of salt stress by encoding osmoprotectant solutes (Moghaieb et al., 2000(Moghaieb et al., , 2011Goel et al., 2010;Wei et al., 2017). To maintain the cellular acidity under salt stress many Na + /H + antiporter genes also have been transformed like NHX1, TaNHX2, and LeNHX4 which regulate the Na + /H + to maintain cellular homeostasis Yarra et al., 2012;García-Abellan et al., 2014). Transgenes like cAPX, MdSOS2L1, AnnSp2, LeNHX2 and SlSOS2, At FeSOD, and BcZAT12 have been also transformed and works with different modes of action, details of the gene transformed in tomato and their mode of action are summarized in Table 1. Like potato and tomato, other important Solanaceous crops like brinjal and chili face the salt stress; in these crops also transgenics have been developed for salt stress, and details of the transgenic crop in Solanaceae family are given in Table 1. In vine crops group like cucumber, cucurbits, and bottle gourds are also a very popular in vegetable crops and play an important role in food and nutritional security, salt significantly reduced the yield and quality of vine crops also (Park et al., 2014;Kim et al., 2015;Sun et al., 2018;. In water melon HAL1 transferred which encodes for 32 kDa water soluble proteins which protects from salt induced osmotic stress (Bordas et al., 1997). Park et al. (2014), Han et al. (2015), and Kim et al. (2015) transformed bottle gourds with AVP1 which encodes vacuolar H + -pyrophosphatase, which regulate the proton pump and ultimately maintains the cellular acidity to avoid salt stress ( Table 2). Cole crops like cabbage, cauliflower, mustard green, rape seed, and Chinese cabbage constitute a major group of leafy vegetable, which are considered as cheapest and richest sources of mineral, vitamins, and oils and they play an important role in nutrition and food security (Wang et al., 2010;Kim et al., 2016;Ahmed et al., 2017;Luo et al., 2017). The cole crops are very sensitive to the salt stress, and different genes like CodA, PgNHX1, OsNASI, BnSIP1-1, APX, SOD, and LEA4-1 have been transferred to sustain salt stress (Park et al., 2005;Wang et al., 2010;Kong et al., 2011). Details of the gene transferred and their mechanism of action in cole crops is given in Table 3. Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org FIGURE 2 | Functional annotation of WRKY and NAC proteins. These functional annotation were retrieved from Cello2GO server and were structured around gene ontologies like biological process, molecular function, and cellular component along with their localization probability. It is to be noted that both WRKY and NAC proteins have diversified function with more specifically targeted to DNA binding or Nucleic acid binding transcriptional factor activity.

TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION OF SALINITY STRESS SIGNALING IN VEGETABLES
Recently, it was demonstrated that during salt stress, the expression level of multiple TFs increases much more compared with their basal trends, which reflects their crucial role in regulating the function mechanism and stress-dynamics of stress-tolerance (Franzoni et al., 2019(Franzoni et al., , 2020. TFs are key regulators that play important roles in various stress responses (Debbarma et al., 2019). In fact, TFs are the key players that actually bind with the cis acting elements to regulate the spatial and temporal expression of specific genes, or genes regulating the functional activities of signal transduction and/or other genes regulating the transcriptional efficiency of stress-responsive genes under environmental stresses . Therefore, transcriptomic characterization for identification of stress-responsive TFs in plants or vegetable crops could be useful as a prominent tool or may provide a genetic resource for transgenic technology to improve the stress-responsive traits in different crops (Hong et al., 2021). The TFs belonging to WRKY, NAC, bZIP, MYB, and AP2/ERF play a crucial role in modifying and fine-tuning of the different stress-responsive genes involved in stress avoidance (Golldack et al., 2014). We have provided a comparative pie chart showing the functional annotation of two different transcriptional factors WRKY and NAC having WRKY and NAC domain. Based on functional annotation and gene ontology structured around three ontological terms, biological processes, molecular function, and cellular component, we reported and confirmed the function of WRKY and NAC TFs as to bind with DNA and also playing an important role in metabolism, stress response, and nucleic acid binding transcriptional factor activity (2) (Figure 2). During the last few years, many TFs have been deployed for transgenic overexpression of different TFs to mitigate various abiotic stresses (Tran et al., 2010). For example, the overexpression of moso bamboo WRKY (Phyllostachys edulis) in Arabidopsis uncovered the importance of PeWRKY83 in imparting salinity tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis . SlAREB1, a bZIP transcriptional activator that belongs to ABA-responsive element binding protein (AREB)/ABA-responsive element binding factor (ABF) subfamily overexpression in tomato lines, reported enhanced salt and drought tolerance (Orellana et al., 2010). Furthermore, with the help of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology it has now become possible to edit specific transcriptional factors that could be directly or indirectly fine-tune the expression and regulation of stress-responsive genes against salinity tolerance in plants (Debbarma et al., 2019). For example, CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing of SlMAPK3 gene in tomato affected the expression level of other drought stress-responsive genes, particularly, SlDREB, SlLOX, and SlGST in tomato. The downregulation of these genes indirectly affected the salinity response and provided tolerance to salinity. Moreover, genetic engineering, gene silencing, CRISPR/Cas9 mediated-genome editing, transgenic overexpression, gene complementation and genetic transformation, mutant analysis studies done so far for engineering better salt-tolerance strategies in various vegetable and horticultural crops have of course identified novel signaling pathways, interconnected networks, transcriptional activators in mitigating salinity as well as other environmental stresses. Recently, CRISPR/Cas9 technology has provided a novel platform for precise editing of alleles that could assist in providing stress tolerance in plants. Further, the latest advancement in CRISPR-Cas system has sparked the genome editing revolution in plant genetics and breeding. We have discussed the role of  some of the important TFs that regulate the stress-tolerance mechanism in plants.

WRKY Gene Family in Salt Tolerance in Vegetables
WRKY gene family is one of the most important transcriptional regulators that regulates stress tolerance mechanism in plants.
Many studies done till so far have highlighted the functional role of WRKY gene signaling against various abiotic and biotic stress response in plants (Aamir et al., 2017(Aamir et al., , 2019Hichri et al., 2017;Bai et al., 2018;. It has been well documented that WRKYs gene-mediated plant defense is controlled by both crossregulation and autoregulation, and extensive signaling involving multiple protein partners like histone acetylases, MAP kinases, MAP kinases kinases (MAPKK), calmodulin, 14-3-3 proteins, and other associated WRKYs partners in a complex network and dynamic web with built in redundancy to fine tune the transcriptional reprogramming, genetic-expression, and stress-tolerance (Rushton et al., 2010). WRKYs prominent role in both abiotic as well as biotic stress tolerance is welldocumented (Rushton et al., 2010;Phukan et al., 2016;Bai et al., 2018). WRKYs role in salinity tolerance against various horticultural crops and other plants is well reported ( Table 4). For example, Kashyap et al. (2020) reported the relevance of tomato WRKY1, WRKY3, and WRKY72 in mitigating salt stress in wild tomato Solanum chilense as the expression of these WRKYs was more prominent and increased the expression in

HAL1
A vacuolar Na + /H + antiport Water soluble protein (32 kDa) that may modulate monovalent ion channels, by affecting the set point of intracellular potassium determined by the feedback regulation of the uptake system Ellul et al., 2003 wild genotype compared with domestic and cultivated genotype DVRT1. Villano et al. (2020) characterized the list of putative WRKYs involved in various abiotic and biotic stresses in two wild relatives of potato Solanum commersonii and Solanum chacoense, and revealed the ScWRKY23 as multiple stress regulator WRKY in wild potato (Villano et al., 2020). Likewise, Hichri et al. (2016) also reported the expression of tomato WRKY3 in alleviating salt stress (Hichri et al., 2016). Transcriptomic characterization and function validation through qRT-PCR analysis unraveled the expression profiling and importance of sweet potato WRKYs after treatment with 150 mM salt stress (Qin et al., 2020). In one work, Yue et al. (2019) provided the genome-wide identification and characterization of 92 WRKY genes in Chenopodium quinoa, and reported the importance of 25 WRKYs in both development and stress tolerance. Similarly, genomewide identification and characterization of WRKYs in Cucumis sativus (cucumber) unraveled the importance of CsWRKY9, CsWRKY18, CsWRKY48, and CsWRKY57, in both heat and salt stress tolerance . In another study, based on Illumina RNA-seq transcriptomic studies, Tang et al. (2014) reported the tissue-specific and differential expression profiles of the Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis (Chinese cabbage) and further validated their role in different abiotic and biotic stresses (Tang et al., 2014). Karanja et al. (2017a) reported 126 WRKYs in Raphanus sativus out of which 35 WRKYs had differential expression in various abiotic stresses. Further, the relevance of WRKY3 in salt tolerance could be better understood as CRISPR/Cas9-mediated WRKY3 and WRKY4 mutagenesis in Arabidopsis, decreasing both MeJA stress as well as decreased salt tolerance in Arabidopsis .

Ethylene Response Factors
The APETALA2/ethylene responsive factor (AP2/ERF) family of transcription factor is one of the prominent groups of transcriptional activator/regulator during various abiotic and biotic stress responses in plants. ERF group has been further classified or subdivided into the dehydration-responsive elementbinding proteins (DREBs). The AP2/ERF families in different plants have been further subdivided based on the presence of double AP2 domain, single AP2 domain, and/or single AP2 domain along with presence of a B3-DNA binding domain (Nakano et al., 2006). The interaction of ERF proteins with DRE/CRT motif and cis-acting elements is generally associated with stress-responsive genes and plays a crucial role in mitigation of various environmental stresses. For example, transgenic overexpression of ERF1-V (Haynaldia villosa) in wheat provided salt tolerance (Xing et al., 2017). Similarly, a ERF gene from wheat (TaERF3) overexpression had significant results against salt stress compared with control counterparts in wheat (Rong et al., 2014). In one work, Yang et al. (2018) performed the microarray analysis on salt-tolerant genes in wild tomato lines Solanum pimpinellifolium PI365967' under the effect of salt treatment and reported the increased expression of five ERF genes (SpERF). Sequence analysis and transcriptomic characterization of these five SpERFs uncovered the crucial seven amino acid residues that were involved in binding with GCC box in the promoter of

BrGI
Reduced expression of GI, enhanced salt tolerance Kim et al., 2016 ethylene responsive genes and were shown to be conserved in all the reported ERFs (Yang et al., 2018). In recent years, ERF TFs have been investigated in depth in various horticultural as well as vegetable crops to enhance the breeding program as well as crop improvement, with respect to various environmental stresses in plants (Table 4). For example, transgenic overexpression of tomato ERF84 (SlERF84) in Arabidopsis provided resistance against salt and drought. Further, tomato ERFTF (Sl-ERF.B.3) expression was found to be decreased/downregulated under salinity stress and drought conditions, whereas it has been found to be upregulated/increased following the exposure to cold, flood, and heat response.

NAC Transcription Family
NAC (NAM, ATAF, and CUC) TFs have been considered an important group of transcriptional activators that play an important role in developmental programming as well as to encounter challenges against various environmental constraints (Tran et al., 2010;Puranik et al., 2012). The DNA binding property of NAC TFs lie at their N-terminal end (Figure 3). The expression of NAC proteins is highly dependent on the promoter region as each and every NAC gene is characterized by the presence of at least one unique cis-element type in their promoter . NAC TFs role in various abiotic and biotic stress responses is well-documented (Table 4). For example, salt-tolerance in tomato is well regulated by NAC1 transcription factor as the enhanced expression of SlNAC1 in root, flower, seeds, and green fruits following the salt stress are well known (Yang et al., 2011). Transcriptomic characterization unraveled the importance of 10 NAC genes in tomato against abiotic stresses (Song et al., 2015). In this context, Liu et al. (2014) reported the relevance of tomato NAC transcription factor SlSRN1 in mediating the positive defense response against biotic stresses while regulating negatively to abiotic stress signaling . Yang et al. (2011) reported the expression profiling of tomato NAC1 (SlNAC1), an ATAF subfamily transcription factor in different tissues (root, leaves, seeds, and fruit) under salt stress (Yang et al., 2011). Likewise, potato NAC genes StNAC072 and StNAC101 that have been reported as orthologs of known stressresponsive Arabidopsis responsive to dehydration 26 (RD26) were found to play a crucial role in mitigating abiotic stress response (Singh et al., 2013). Wei et al. (2016) performed the  genome-wide characterization of NAC transcription factor family in melon (Cucumis melo L.) and evaluated their expression profile during salt stress. Further, transgenic overexpression of CmNAC14 in Arabidopsis resulted in increased salt-tolerance (Wei et al., 2016). Karanja et al. (2017b) reported the tissuespecific expression profiling of radish NAC TFs and reported the positive regulation of RsNAC023 and RsNAC080 toward all types to abiotic stresses. Further, RsNAC145 had much more active expression profile under salt, heat, and drought stresses when compared with other genes that were expressed under different abiotic stresses (Karanja et al., 2017b). Li et al. (2016) investigated and characterized the list of putative NAC TFs in water melon (Citruluslanatus) across the genome and also checked the expression profile and potential function of several NAC TFs in different stresses. Overall, transgene overexpression of IbNAC7 in Arabidopsis provided salt tolerance. Recently, Duan et al. (2020) provided the genome-wide characterization of NAC gene family in leafy vegetable Apium graveolens and studied the characterized WRKYs for their stress-tolerance attribute. It was found that a total 111 NAC member were present based on genomic studies. Further, transcriptomic characterization under various abiotic stresses uncovered the AgNAC63 (ortholog of ANAC072/RD26 role in mitigating salt, cold, and heat stresses). However, the study reported tissue-specific higher expression profiles AgNAC63 and AgNAC47 in leaves under the different treatments (Duan et al., 2020).

Basic Leucine Zipper
The basic leucine (Leu) zipper (bZIP) family also includes one of the most important group of transcriptional activator against abiotic and biotic stress response . bZIP family also plays an essential role in growth and development of plants (Sornaraj et al., 2016). The bZIP name was based on the presence of the bZIP domain. The bZIP domain is characterized by some specific structural features that is located on an alphahelix. It has been reported that the first 18 amino acid residues constitute the basic group followed by an invariant N-x7-R/K-x9 motifs for nuclear localization and sequence-specific DNA binding. However, for the second part, the Leu zipper region composed of several heptad repeats of Leu amino acid or other bulky amino acids, such as isoleucine, valine, phenyl nine, tryptophan, or methionine, positioned exactly nine amino acids toward the C-terminus, creating an amphipathic helix (Jakoby et al., 2002;Nijhawan et al., 2008). It has been reported that in bZIP transcriptional proteins, apart from the bZIP domain, some other transcriptional active domains are found and play an essential role in bZIP functioning. The most common site that function as transcriptional activator include phosphorylation site [R/KxxS/T (Furihata et al., 2006;Liao et al., 2008)] and a string of glutamine rich motif. The basic part of the Leu zipper interact with ACGT core region of the B-DNA sequences, particularly, at A-box (TACGTA), G-box (CACGTG), and C-box (GACGTC) (Izawa et al., 1993;Foster et al., 1994). In fact, during the DNA-protein interaction of bZIP proteins with DNA motifs, the half N-terminal of the bZIP domain interacts with DNA major grove region, whereas the other C-terminal end of the Leu zipper constitutes dimer formation for a coiled superimposed structure, defined as zipper superimposed coiled structure, the so-called zipper (Landschulz et al., 1988;Ellenberger et al., 1992). bZIP proteins also play an essential role in imparting tolerance against several abiotic as well as biotic stresses (Table 4). For example, Gai et al. (2021) characterize the list of different bZIP TFs in pepper and reported the relevance of CabZIP25 in imparting salt tolerance as overexpression done in transgenic Arabidopsis. Wang et al. (2018) identified the list of 54 and 50 bZIP proteins from whole-genome sequences of Vigna radiata and Vigna angularis, respectively.

GRAFTING STRATEGIES IN VEGETABLE CROPS FOR SALT STRESS TOLERANCE
Improving the productivity of vegetable crops is a challenge under salt-affected soil or water. Hence, increasing salt tolerance in vegetable crops will have a greater impact in nutritional and economic security, particularly of (semi) arid regions, where salinity in soil and water are widespread . Traditional breeding programs have been attempted to improve salt tolerance in crop plants (Borsani et al., 2003), but the commercial success is limited due to the trait's complexity. Currently, major efforts are being directed toward genetic transformation in plants to increase their tolerance, and despite the trait's complexity, the transfer of a single gene or a few genes has resulted in claims of improved salt tolerance, such as the expression of genes involved in the control of Na + transport (Gaxiola et al., 2001). But, the genetically complicated mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance, as well as the possibility for adverse side effects make this a challenging task (Flowers, 2004). However, unless a full proof practical and faster breeding tool comes in vogue, a well-proven fast and eco-friendly technique "vegetable grafting" can be deployed to increase tolerance to stresses in vegetables. Vegetable grafting, in fact, has emerged as an efficient tool to sustainably increase vigor and yield of commercial cultivars under challenged growth environment by mechanically attaching with resistant root genotypes.

Grafting Alleviates Salt Stress
Salinity disturbs dry mass partitioning between vegetative and reproductive organs, whereas grafted plants exhibited less alteration (Parthasarathi et al., 2021). In grafting, some rootstocks may have better performance than the others, though their response may change depending on level of salt concentration in the growth medium Bayoumi et al., 2021). Numerous reports have demonstrated the ameliorative response of grafting to salinity stress in cucurbitaceous crops (e.g., melon, watermelon, and cucumber) involving the Cucurbita interspecific hybrid rootstocks (Goreta et al., 2008;Rouphael et al., 2012). The agronomic performance of pepper cv. "Adige" under natural salinity condition was clearly evident with 75% higher yield and with 31% lesser fruit damage (blossom end rot) when it was grafted onto a salt-tolerant accession "A 25" as rootstock in comparison with non-grafted control plants (Penella et al., 2016). Eggplant ("SuqiQie") grafting onto the rootstock of wild eggplant (Solanum torvum cv. "Torvum vigor") provided salinity tolerance by minimizing the yield reduction under saline stress (Wei et al., 2009). In contrary, Chen et al. (2003) found that scion genotypes had a significant impact on the growth of grafted tomato plants, regardless of the salinity of the growing environment, but rootstock had no impact.

Mechanism of Salt Tolerance in Grafted Plants
Grafting is a reciprocal integrative process; the salt tolerance of grafted plants is influenced by both scion and rootstock (Etehadnia et al., 2008). The positive response of grafting can be attributed to more vigorous and robust root systems, greater efficiency of roots for water and nutrient uptake with efficiency to exclude salt-ions, higher photosynthesis, and better oxidative defense system, hormonal regulations, and osmotic adjustment of the grafted plants as compared with the non-grafted plants (Amaro et al., 2014;Rouphael et al., 2017;Singh et al., 2020).

Root Characteristics
Root, besides providing physical support and anchor to the plants, plays a crucial role in water and ion uptake and their supply to aerial part that help regulate various plant processes . However, the alteration in root characteristics is expected to occur since roots being the foremost plant organ exposed to saline growth medium , consequently the subsequent effects on water and mineral uptake (Rouphael et al., 2017). The numerous reports claim that grafting onto genetically strong root system can effectively mitigate the effect of salinity on the performance of salt-sensitive scion cultivars (Colla et al., 2013); hence it prompts the emphasis of selecting the vigorous root stock for increasing salt tolerance (Colla et al., 2013;Singh et al., 2020). Salinity depressed shoot and root parameters, but grafted plants of tomato onto potato rootstocks were able to avoid the changes in their growths with balanced partitioning between vegetative and reproductive dry masses (Parthasarathi et al., 2021). Furthermore, the tolerance ability of grafting provided by the rootstocks is often associated with the root morphological characteristics to exclude Na + and/or Cl − under saline medium.

Regulation of Salt and Mineral Ions
Grafted plants tend to restrain Na + and Cl − ions in their root tissues, preventing them from being translocated to the shoots and leaves in high concentrations. The diverse agronomic responses of grafted plants to salinity in numerous studies were resulted by the differential abilities of root genotypes to regulate the uptake and/or translocation of ions of the salts, and of nutrients, due to their competitive interactions (Rouphael et al., 2017). The ability of rootstocks to minimize toxicity of Na + and/or Cl − by exclusion and/or reduction of Cl − absorption by the roots, as well as the replacement or substitution of K + by total Na + in the foliage has been related to the enhancement of salt tolerance by grafting (Martinez-Rodriguez et al., 2008). In pepper, salt-tolerant wild pepper rootstocks "ECU-973" (Capsicum chinense) and "BOL-58" (Capsicum baccatum var. pendulum) provided salinity tolerance in pepper ("Adige") plants by controlling Na + and Cl − ions accumulation in shoots (Penella et al., 2015). In spite of maintaining better control over Na + and Cl − accumulation in their shoots, grafted plants were able to maintain higher ratio of K + /Na + in grafted cucumber on pumpkin rootstock (Usanmaz and Abak, 2019), and higher K + and Ca ++ in grafted eggplant (Talhouni et al., 2019). Salinity tolerance in a salt-sensitive cucumber ("Jinchun No. 2") was enhanced by grafting onto a salt-tolerant pumpkin rootstock ("Chaojiquanwang"); this tolerance mechanism shows the better ability of pumpkin rootstock to exclude Na + , and thus lesser amount of Na + ions (−69%) reaches the cucumber shoots .

Physio-Biochemical Alterations
The tolerance response of grafting on vigorous rootstock with efficiency to control Na + ion accumulation in shoots has been associated with the efficiency of rootstocks to modulate water uptake by roots and losses by transpiration. Grafting onto some rootstock was useful to maintain better leaf water status than the others. Grafting tomato ("Ikram") on potato rootstock ("Charlotte") was found promising to increase salinity tolerance of 5.0 dS/m in grafted tomato with enhanced water productivity (+56.8%) (Parthasarathi et al., 2021). Grafting onto certain rootstocks was able to mitigate salt induced photoinhibition of photosynthesis and consequently growth of grafted plants . As a coping mechanism of oxidative damage, plants activate enzymatic (i.e., ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, superoxide dismutase, monodehydroascorbate reductase, dehydro ascorbate reductase, and glutathione reductase) as well as non-enzymatic (i.e., reduced glutathione, reduced ascorbate, carotenoids, and tocopherols) antioxidant systems (Rouphael et al., 2017;Singh et al., 2020). Grafting studies demonstrated that some of the graft combinations have a better ability to mitigate salinity stress by regulating antioxidative defense system than the others. Salt-stressed eggplants experienced oxidative stress (higher malondialdehyde, MDA), whereas grafted eggplants were capable of mitigating ROS induced by oxidative stress as a result of increased level of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, and APX) (Talhouni et al., 2019). Polyamines increase under salinity stress and hence increases plants tolerance; the increased level of polyamines (free, soluble, and conjugated polyamines) provided better tolerance to salinity (i.e., excess calcium nitrate) in grafted seedlings than the non-grafted tomatoes (Wei et al., 2009). Stegemann and Bock (2009) reported that plant grafting can result in the exchange of genetic information via either large DNA pieces or entire plastid genomes. However, gene transfer is restricted to the contact zone between scion and rootstock. Thus, the use of rootstock cannot change the sensitivity of scion itself to salt stress. Working with model plant Arabidopsis, Shi et al. (2002) reported that SOS1 (salt excessively sensitive) gene is expected to play a role in the loading of Na + into the xylem tracheids from xylem parenchyma cells. Further reports suggest that in Arabidopsis, high affinity K + transporters (HKTs) were involved in the removal of Na + from the xylem (Rus et al., 2001(Rus et al., , 2006Sunarpi et al., 2005;Davenport et al., 2007), and hence the leaves were safe from Na + ion toxicity. Furthermore, it was recently discovered that expressing the Na + transporter HKT1;1 in the mature root stele of Arabidopsis thaliana utilizing an enhancer trap expression system reduced Na + build up in the shoot by 37-64%, and hence increased salinity tolerance (Møller et al., 2009). Using grafting experiments, it was discovered that HKT1;1 expressed in the root rather than the shoot regulates Na + accumulation in Arabidopsis shoots (Rus et al., 2006), implying that the SOS1 analogous gene and HKTs are likely involved in Na + transport in the pumpkin rootstock, allowing it to limit Na + transport from the root to the shoot. Grafting onto some rootstocks has shown to also increase scion's tolerance to salinity by modulating the hormonal balance namely of ABA, cytokinins, and polyamines (Rouphael et al., 2017). The reduced transpiration with maintained leaf water relations by elevated level of shoot ABA concentration under salt stress have been reported . The enhanced salinity tolerance in tomato was related to increased level of ABA content in scion shoots, irrespective of the rootstocks raised under saline condition (Chen et al., 2003). Likewise, increased root-to-shoot cytokine transport by rootstock that overexpressed cytokinin biosynthesis genes (e.g., isopentenyl transferase) was associated with the increased salinity tolerance in tomato presented by maintained stomatal conductance and photosystem II efficiency accompanied with lesser accumulation of toxic ions, consequently producing higher shoot and fruit growths (Ghanem et al., 2011).

CONCLUSION
Abiotic stresses like salt stress which persists throughout plant's whole life cycle negatively affects plant yield and nutritional quality. To ensure vegetable production under salt stress many transgenes have been transferred to the vegetables. Transforming vegetables are the one of the most reliable technique to cope salt stress as most of the vegetable gene pool lack novel gene for salt stress in its gene pool. To manage salt stress at molecular level, the native TFs in the vegetable crops are also being regulated to sustain yield and quality under salt stress. Grafting has shown potential to alleviate salinity stress (water or soil) on the selected vigorous and tolerant rootstocks. Certain wild accessions which possess resistance to salinity but are difficult to introgress these traits into commercial cultivars through traditional breeding tools, can be utilized as rootstock to increase grafted scion's efficiency or tolerance to salinity. Plant biologists around the world are grappling with the dilemma of exponential population growth and rising food demand. Abiotic stress, such as salt, is a major threat to agricultural productivity and has been linked to worsening food security trends since the beginning. Soil salinity and degradation of soil quality are linked to lower agricultural yields. The production of salinity-tolerant crops is the only way to ensure global food. The actual yield produced by saline soils is more than half of what was originally predicted for normal soils. Organic matter and biodiversity are quite low in these soils.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.