<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.968707</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Is the NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-induced growth inhibition caused by the NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> form of the nitrogen source or by soil acidification?</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Feng</given-names></name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/914494/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Qiang</given-names></name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Qiaogang</given-names></name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ye</surname><given-names>Jing</given-names></name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>Jingwen</given-names></name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Haitian</given-names></name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Yong</surname><given-names>Jean W. H.</given-names></name><xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref rid="aff3" ref-type="aff"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/573955/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Yijun</given-names></name><xref rid="aff4" ref-type="aff"><sup>4</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Xiaoxia</given-names></name><xref rid="aff4" ref-type="aff"><sup>4</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kong</surname><given-names>Haimin</given-names></name><xref rid="aff4" ref-type="aff"><sup>4</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>Xinhua</given-names></name><xref rid="aff3" ref-type="aff"><sup>3</sup></xref><xref rid="aff5" ref-type="aff"><sup>5</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/355436/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Junwei</given-names></name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref rid="c001" ref-type="corresp"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Institute of Environmental Resources and Soil Fertilizers, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Hangzhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Department of Biosystems and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Alnarp</addr-line>, <country>Sweden</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia</institution>, <addr-line>Perth, WA</addr-line>, <country>Australia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Arable Soil Quality and Fertilizer Administration Station of Zhejiang Province</institution>, <addr-line>Hangzhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff5"><sup>5</sup><institution>Centre of Excellence for Soil Biology, College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University</institution>, <addr-line>Chongqing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn id="fn0001" fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Mohsin Tanveer, University of Tasmania, Australia</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fn0002" fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Peng Yan, Institute of Crop Sciences (CAAS), China; Yefeng Jiang, Zhejiang University, China</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Junwei Ma, <email>majw@zaas.ac.cn</email>
</corresp>
<fn id="fn0003" fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Crop and Product Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>09</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>968707</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>14</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>15</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2022 Wang, Wang, Yu, Ye, Gao, Liu, Yong, Yu, Liu, Kong, He and Ma.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Wang, Wang, Yu, Ye, Gao, Liu, Yong, Yu, Liu, Kong, He and Ma</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Soil acidification often occurs when the concentration of ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>) in soil rises, such as that observed in farmland. Both soil acidification and excess NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> have serious adverse effects on crop growth and food production. However, we still do not know which of these two inhibitors has a greater impact on the growth of crops, and the degree of their inhibitory effect on crop growth have not been accurately evaluated. 31 wheat cultivars originating in various areas of China were planted under 5&#x2009;mM sole NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> (ammonium nitrogen, AN) or nitrate nitrogen in combined with two pH levels resembling acidified conditions (5.0 and 6.5). The results showed that the shoots and roots biomass were severely reduced by AN in both and these reduction effects were strengthened by a low medium pH. The concentration of free NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> and amino acids, the glutamine synthetase activity were significantly higher, but the total soluble sugar content was reduced under NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> conditions, and the glutamine synthetase activity was reduced by a low medium pH. Cultivar variance was responsible for the largest proportion of the total variance in plant dry weight, leaf area, nodal root number, total root length and root volume; the nitrogen (N) form explains most of the variation in N and C metabolism; the effects of pH were the greatest for plant height and root average diameter. So, soil acidification and excess NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> would cause different degrees of inhibition effects on different plant tissues. The findings are expected to be useful for applying effective strategies for reducing NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> stress in the field.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>soil acidification</kwd>
<kwd>ammonium stress</kwd>
<kwd>nitrogen assimilation</kwd>
<kwd>wheat growth</kwd>
<kwd>natural variation</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="4"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="41"/>
<page-count count="11"/>
<word-count count="7268"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The industrial nitrogen (N) fertilizers application has contributed tremendously to the increase in global food production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Gong et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Zhang et al., 2013</xref>). However, less than half of the applied N (30&#x2013;40%) is utilized by crops in China to date (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Ding et al., 2020</xref>). The N lost included run-off, volatilization, leaching, and denitrification, which together lead to a range of major ecological challenges and environmental problems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Chen et al., 2014</xref>). Unlike nitrate nitrogen (NN), ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>) nitrogen (AN) can be assimilated into amino acid production by plants without further chemical reduction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Coskun et al., 2017</xref>). The NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-based stabilized fertilizers application was considered to be a promising future strategy for improving agronomic N use efficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Ren et al., 2021</xref>). Unfortunately, most dryland crops, including wheat, can be markedly inhibited when the concentration of ammonium in soil is too high, whereas the comparable inhibitory effect does not occur for NN fertilization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Miller and Cramer, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Coskun et al., 2017</xref>). In southern China, especially in red-yellow soil areas, approach 20&#x2009;mM NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> concentration in soil was recorded (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Xu et al., 2012</xref>), much higher than the 0.1&#x2013;0.5&#x2009;mM optimal NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> concentration for upland crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref230">Liu et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
<p>The membrane potential would be depolarized during the NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> uptake and assimilation process, resulting in an increase in the net proton release, as well as external soil acidification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Zhu et al., 2012</xref>). Over the last few decades, the Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, and K<sup>+</sup> depletion and sulfur (S) and N atmospheric deposition have promoted soil acidification and reduced the soil&#x2019;s buffering capacity, particularly in the red-yellow soil of southern China, which is located in tropical/subtropical regions; in this region, an average soil pH of 4.5&#x2013;5.5 has been recorded (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Guo et al., 2010</xref>). Soil acidification also produces adverse effects on cell metabolism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Van Den Berg et al., 2005</xref>). NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> was assimilated into organic N compounds in cells primarily through the GS/GOGAT pathway (glutamine synthetase, GS, EC 6.3.1.2; glutamate synthase, GOGAT, EC 1.4.1.14) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">El Omari et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Xu et al., 2012</xref>). Plant species maintaining a low intracellular with higher GS activity are thought to be more tolerant to NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> toxicity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Cruz et al., 2006</xref>). In addition, the increased carbon consumption caused by increased NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> assimilation in roots also partially explain NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-induced growth inhibition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Britto and Kronzucker, 2002</xref>). However, few studies have examined the relationship between NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> stress and soil acidification or whether the NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-induced growth inhibition is caused by an NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> form source or soil acidification caused by NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> absorption.</p>
<p>The understanding of plant growth in response to NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> tolerance is mainly based on studies of mutants and transformants or some model plants such as rice, <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Guo et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Zhu et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Li et al., 2010</xref>). Wheat is one of the most widely cultivated crops in the world, which is sensitive to NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> toxicity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Wang et al., 2019</xref>). In many cases, wheat have to face excess NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> in China, which is often the case in the field with the use of slow-release fertilizers and nitrification inhibitors, especially during fertilization stag. It is a very important and necessary object to study genetic variability of wheat adaptation to NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> toxicity combined with soil acidification. Its ecotypes have been found show a wide range of habitats differing notably in soil richness. These natural variations indeed provide a framework to study the adaptation of different traits that define plant growth in relation to simultaneous genetic changes and environmental variations, while there is lack of studies on this topic In this study, we conducted hydroponic experiments using 31 wheat cultivars in media with different N forms (AN or NN) and pH values. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the inhibitory degree of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> form source and soil acidification on crop growth. The results would provide useful insight into the selection and breeding of crop cultivars with greater potential to adapt to NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-form N source combined with soil acidification in the field.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<title>Plant materials and experimental design</title>
<p>Seeds of 31 wheat varieties of China selected from a collection that was shown to maximize the genetic diversity of a large set of genotypes of China (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>) were used. 20% (v/v) H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> were used to surface-sterilized uniform seeds for 10&#x2009;min, and then rinsed the seeds more than 5 times with distilled water. The seeds were germinated on filter paper covering with wet sterilized gauze, and then transplanted them to sterilized silica sand until the seedling bud length was about 1&#x2009;cm. At two-leaf stage, uniform seedlings were transplanted into black plastic containers (length&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;width&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;height, 45&#x2009;cm&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;32&#x2009;cm&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;15&#x2009;cm) in an artificial illumination incubator with a 16&#x2009;h/8&#x2009;h light (a 1,200&#x2009;&#x03BC;mol&#x2009;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> photosynthetic photon flux density)/dark with temperatures of 18&#x00B0;C day/10&#x00B0;C night cycle. A modified Hoagland nutrient solution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Gao et al., 2018</xref>) was used with two N form sources: sole NO<sub>3</sub><sup>&#x2212;</sup> source solution (NN) or a sole NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> source solution (AN). The sole NO<sub>3</sub><sup>&#x2212;</sup> source solution composition was as follows: macronutrients (mmol&#x2009;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>): 5.0&#x2009;N as KNO<sub>3</sub> and Ca(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> or (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, 3.0&#x2009;K as KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> and K<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> or KNO<sub>3</sub>, 1.5 Ca as CaSO<sub>4</sub>, or CaCl<sub>2</sub> and Ca(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>, 1.0&#x2009;Mg as MgSO<sub>4</sub>, 1.0 P as KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, 0.5 Na as NaCl; and micronutrients (mmol&#x2009;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>): 1.0 Fe as Fe-EDTA, 0.15&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;10<sup>&#x2212;3</sup> Zn as ZnSO<sub>4</sub>, 0.16&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;10<sup>&#x2212;3</sup> Cu as CuSO<sub>4</sub>, 9.10&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;10<sup>&#x2212;3</sup> Mn as MnSO<sub>4</sub>, 18.5&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;10<sup>&#x2212;3</sup> B as H<sub>3</sub>BO<sub>3</sub>, 0.52&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;10<sup>&#x2212;3</sup> Mo as MoO<sub>3</sub>. The sole NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> source solution composition was as follows, macronutrients (mmol&#x2009;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>): 5.0&#x2009;mM&#x2009;N as (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, 3.0&#x2009;mM&#x2009;K as K<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, 1.5&#x2009;mM Ca as CaSO<sub>4</sub> and CaCl<sub>2</sub>, 1.0&#x2009;mM P as KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, 1.0&#x2009;mM&#x2009;Mg as MgSO<sub>4</sub>, and 0.5&#x2009;mM Na as NaCl. The micronutrients composition in the AN source solution were the same with those in the NN source solution.</p>
<p>The pH of the AN or NN source solution was adjusted to 5.0 (to imitate the acidified red-yellow soil region of southern China) or 6.5 (as the normal condition for wheat growth) by adding 0.1&#x2009;mM H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> or 0.1&#x2009;mM NaOH to the solutions; thus, the solutions are denoted by the treatment solution-pH as NN-6.5, AN-6.5, NN-5.0, and AN-5.0. The pH of the Hoagland solution was adjusted daily to the pH 5.0 or 6.5 also using 0.1&#x2009;mM NaOH or 0.1&#x2009;mM H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> during the whole experimental process. Dicyandiamide (A nitrification inhibitor, 1&#x2009;mM) was added to prevent NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> microbial oxidation. The solutions were replenished every 3&#x2009;days. All treatments had three replicates with a completely random design.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<title>Plant sampling and traits analysis</title>
<p>Shoots and roots were harvested 21&#x2009;days after the start of the different pH values and N forms treatment, frozen in liquid nitrogen, the stored at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C for physiological analysis, and dried partially at 105&#x00B0;C for 20&#x2009;min and then 75&#x00B0;C for 24&#x2009;h to obtain a constant weight. Root morphology was estimated from images of plants taken by a root scan machine (Epson 1,680, Indonesia), with WinRhizo Pro Vision 5.0 analysis program (Canada). A Li-3000 area meter (Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE, United States) was used to measure leaf area. Free NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> concentration in plant shoot and root was measured according to the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Balkos et al. (2010)</xref>. Soluble sugars concentration in tissues were measured from the hydroalcoholic extracts using a colorimetric assay with an anthrone reagent (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Wang et al., 2019</xref>). Free amino acids concentration in shoot and root was determined using the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref310">Moore and Stein (1954)</xref>. GS activity and nitrate reductase (NR) activity were determined, as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Wang et al., 2016</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>The variance (ANOVA) analysis was carried out using the SPSS general linear model procedure (SPSS 19.0, United States). The different forms and pH levels of N nutrition and different varieties were considered the observed variation sources for the studied cultivars. The quantity of variation (%) for each factor was estimated using the total calculated sum of squares (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Wang et al., 2016</xref>). The figures were created using SigmaPlot graphics software (ver. 14.0; Systat Inc., San Jose, CA, United States).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec7">
<title>Plant growth</title>
<p>Both the sole NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> source and rhizosphere acidification inhibited plant growth (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>). Compared to normal growth conditions (NN-6.5, NN at a pH of 6.5), shoot, root, and plant dry weights, plant height; and leaf area were reduced by 14.7, 33.4, and 19.0%; 16.2%; and 13.0%, respectively, for AN-6.5; 23.7, 21.7, and 23.2%; 24.3%; and 23.3% for NN-5.0; and 33.3, 47.0, and 36.4%; 34.0%; and 31.7% for AN-5.0. All of these parameters significantly differed according to cultivar, N form, and pH level; also, there were N form&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;pH levels interaction effects (<xref rid="tab1" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref>). In shoot dry weight, plant dry weight (41.4%), and leaf area (60.4%), cultivar variance explained the largest proportion of the total variance (48.1%). Differently, N forms and pH levels accounted for the largest proportion of the variance in root dry weight (40.3%) and plant height (38.2%), respectively.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Biomass allocation, plant height, leaf area and root morphology of 31 wheat cultivars grown under different N-sources and pH levels. Data are means &#x00B1; SE (n = 31). NN-6.5 refers to the nitrate nitrogen at a pH of 6.5; NN-4.5 refers to the nitrate nitrogen at a pH of 6.5; AN-6.5 refers to the ammonium nitrogen at a pH of 6.5; AN-5.0 refers to the ammonium nitrogen at a pH of 5.0.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-13-968707-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p><italic>F-</italic>values in two-way ANOVA analysis of shoot dry weight, root dry weight, plant dry weight, plant height and leaf area in 31 wheat cultivars seedlings under different N-sources and pH levels.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Source</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">df</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Shoot dry weight</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Root dry weight</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Plant dry weight</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Plant height</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Leaf area</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum (&#x00D7;10<sup>3</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum (&#x00D7;10<sup>3</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum (&#x00D7;10<sup>3</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum (&#x00D7;10<sup>2</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum (&#x00D7;10<sup>2</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">Cultivar</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">218 (48.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">22.9 (38.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">17<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">300 (41.4)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">9.5 (34.5)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">8.6<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">72.9 (60.4)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">19.6<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">pH</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">145 (32.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">336<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">8.6 (14.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">202<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">225 (31.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">378<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">10.6 (38.2)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">286.5<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">28.8 (23.9)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">232.4<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">N-forms</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">48 (10.7)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">112<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">24.2 (40.3)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">565<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">141 (19.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">237<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.9 (14.4)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">108.1<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">7.4 (6.2)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">60.2<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">pH&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;N-forms</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2 (0.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.5 (0.8)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4 (0.6)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.2 (0.9)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">6.7<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.35 (0.3)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.8&#x2009;ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">Error</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">90</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">39 (8.6)</td>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.8 (6.4)</td>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">53 (7.4)</td>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.3 (12.0)</td>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">12.4 (9.2)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>N-forms refers to the three nitrogen-forms effect; pH refers to the three pH levels effect; N-forms &#x00D7; pH refers to nitrogen-form&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;pH levels interaction effects. Values in brackets following the sum of squares for variables indicate the percentage (%) of given variation to total variation. <sup>&#x002A;</sup> and <sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup> indicate significant at 0.05 and 0.01 level, respectively. df refers to the degree of freedom. ns means to no significant difference.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Root morphogenesis also depended on N form and rhizosphere acidification conditions (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>). Compared with the NN-6.5 condition, maximum seminal and nodal root length, total root length, root surface area and root volume decreased by 33.4, 37.6, 38.3, 31.7 and 31.1% respectively, but nodal root number and root average diameter increased by 15.0 and 2.6%, respectively, at AN-6.5. Compared with NN-6.5, at NN-5.0, maximum seminal and nodal root length, nodal root number, total root length, root surface area, root volume, root average diameter decreased by 22.3, 21.7, 11.7, 20.8, 24.9, 20.3, 22.7% respectively, meanwhile, the decline was even greater at AN-5.0, which was decreased by 48.3, 37.6, 22.7, 51.2, 47.6, 45.5 and 19.7%, respectively. These traits also varied significantly according to cultivar, N form, pH level and N form&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;pH level interaction effects (<xref rid="tab2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>). N forms accounted for the largest proportion of total variance in root length, and cultivar variance was the greatest for root number (59.4%), surface area (42.4%), and volume (47.0%). The average diameter of roots was significantly affected by pH level, but was not affected by the pH and N form interaction.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p><italic>F-</italic>values in two-way ANOVA analysis of root morphological traits in 31 wheat cultivar seedlings under different N-sources and pH levels.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Source</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">df</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Maximum seminal root length</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Nodal root number</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Maximum nodal root length</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Total root length</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Total root surface area</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Total root volume</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Root average diameter</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum (&#x00D7;10<sup>2</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum (&#x00D7;10<sup>2</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum (&#x00D7;10<sup>4</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum (&#x00D7;10<sup>3</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum (&#x00D7;10<sup>3</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">Cultivar</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">42.2 (37.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12.8<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">71.9 (59.4)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">20.5<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">258 (32.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">22.9 (28.8)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">17.4<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="+">38.6 (42.4)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12.4<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">5.86 (47.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">19.2<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.113 (15.4)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.9<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">pH</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">17.1 (15.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">156<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">30.0 (24.9)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2574<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">100 (12.6)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">116<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">10.2 (12.8)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">233<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="+">15.3 (16.8)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">148<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.55 (12.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">153<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.542 (74.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">719<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">N-forms</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">43.8 (38.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">399<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.18 (0.2)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.5&#x2009;ns</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">354 (44.6)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">412<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">42.2 (52.8)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">963<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="+">27.1 (29.7)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">262<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">4.10 (32.9)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">403<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.009 (1.2)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11.3<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">pH&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;N-forms</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.67 (0.6)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6.1<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">8.3 (6.9)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">71.6<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.3 (0.6)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.1<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.56 (0.7)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12.8<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="+">0.73 (0.8)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7.1<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.05 (0.4)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.5&#x002A;</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0 (0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.05&#x2009;ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">Error</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">90</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">9.8 (8.7)</td>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">10.5 (8.7)</td>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">77 (9.7)</td>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.9 (4.9)</td>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char="+">9.3 (10.2)</td>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.91 (7.3)</td>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.68 (9.3)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>N-forms refers to the three nitrogen-forms effect; pH refers to the three pH levels effect; N-forms&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;pH refers to nitrogen-form&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;pH levels interaction effects. Values in brackets following the sum of squares for variables indicate the percentage (%) of given variation to total variation. <sup>&#x002A;</sup> and <sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup> indicate significant at 0.05 and 0.01 level, respectively. df refers to the degree of freedom. ns means to no significant difference.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<title>Free NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> concentration</title>
<p>The concentration of free NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> in wheat under AN was apparently higher than that under NN nutrition condition at a uniform pH (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2</xref>). Compared to NN-6.5, the concentration in shoots was 42.2 and 2.1% higher under AN-6.5 and AN-5.0 but 22.5% lower under NN-5.0 treatments. It changed more in roots than in aerial parts. Compared to NN-6.5, the concentration in roots increased by 365.3 and 214.4% under AN-6.5 and AN-5.0 but decreased by 21.5% under NN-5.0 treatments. In shoot and root, the free NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> concentrations significantly varied by cultivar, N form, and pH level, but changes in cultivars caused the highest proportion of the variance (47.1%) in shoot; but N forms explained the largest proportion of total variance (77.0%) in root.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>The levels of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> in 31 wheat cultivars grown under different N-sources and pH levels. Data are means &#x00B1; SE (n = 31). NN-6.5 refers to the nitrate nitrogen at a pH of 6.5; NN-4.5 refers to the nitrate nitrogen at a pH of 6.5; AN-6.5 refers to the ammonium nitrogen at a pH of 6.5; AN-5.0 refers to the ammonium nitrogen at a pH of 5.0.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-13-968707-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<title>Soluble sugar and free amino acid concentration</title>
<p>Soluble sugar, as the C skeleton for NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> assimilation, also varied with N form and rhizosphere acidification conditions (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figures 3A</xref>,<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">B</xref>). Compared to NN-6.5, the soluble sugar concentrations in shoot and root were lower under AN-6.5, NN-5.0, and especially AN-5.0; also, the level of changed tended to be higher in roots than in shoots. In contrast, as the primary assimilation product of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, free amino acid levels were significantly higher under AN than under NN nutrition. The concentration of free amino acids in shoots under AN-6.5 and AN-5.0 increased by 171.6 and 64.4%, respectively, compared to NN nutrition with pH 6.5, but decreased by 24.3% under NN-5.0 treatment, as shown in <xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figures 3C,D</xref>. Compared to NN-6.5, the concentration of free amino acids in roots under AN-6.5 and AN-5.0 increased by 161.9 and 38.0%, respectively, and was reduced by 22.8% in roots under NN-5.0. The ratio of soluble sugar to free amino acid reflects a balance status of C and N in the process of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> assimilation. As shown in <xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figures 3E</xref>,<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">F</xref>, compared to nitrate treatments, low pH and AN markedly reduced the ratio of soluble sugar of free amino acid in shoot and root. Compared to NN-6.5, NN-5.0, AN-6.5, and AN-5.0 showed reductions in the soluble sugar/free amino acid ratio of 72.3, 22.9, and 52.0% in shoots and by 76.1, 0.7, and 65.7% in roots, respectively. N form explained most of the variance in the soluble sugar and free amino acids concentrations in shoot and root (<xref rid="tab3" ref-type="table">Table 3</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>The levels of soluble sugar, free amino acids and soluble sugar/ free amino acid ratio in shoots and roots of 31 wheat cultivars grown under different N-sources and pH levels. Data are means &#x00B1; SE (n = 31). NN-6.5 refers to the nitrate nitrogen at a pH of 6.5; NN-4.5 refers to the nitrate nitrogen at a pH of 6.5; AN-6.5 refers to the ammonium nitrogen at a pH of 6.5; AN-5.0 refers to the ammonium nitrogen at a pH of 5.0.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-13-968707-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<title>GS and NR activities</title>
<p>GS and NR activities represent the N assimilation ability of wheat and significantly differed by cultivar, N form, and pH level (<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Figure 4</xref>). Compared to NN-6.5, the GS activity increased (86.8%) in shoots under AN-6.5 and decreased (25.2 and 12.8%, respectively) under NN-5.0 and AN-5.0; in roots, it increased (133.7 and 83.2%, respectively) under AN-6.5 and AN-5.0 but decreased (83.2%) under NN-5.0. Compared to NN treatments, pH and AN markedly reduced the NR activity in both shoots and roots. Their activities also varied apparently among all the cultivar, N forms, pH levels and the interaction effects of nitrogen-form &#x00D7; pH levels (<xref rid="tab4" ref-type="table">Table 4</xref>). Variance in pH levels had the strongest effect on shoot GS activity (42.0%); N form had the greatest effect on the GS activity in root, and the NR activity in both shoot and root.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>The enzymatic activities of GS and NR in shoots and roots of 31 wheat cultivars under different N-sources and pH levels. Data are means &#x00B1; SE (n = 31). NN-6.5 refers to the nitrate nitrogen at a pH of 6.5; NN-4.5 refers to the nitrate nitrogen at a pH of 6.5; AN-6.5 refers to the ammonium nitrogen at a pH of 6.5; AN-5.0 refers to the ammonium nitrogen at a pH of 5.0.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-13-968707-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p><italic>F-</italic>values in two-way ANOVA analysis of GS and NR activities in shoot or root of 31 wheat cultivar seedlings under different N-sources and pH levels.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Source</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">df</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">GS activities in shoot</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">GS activities in root</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">NR activities in shoot</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">NR activities in root</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum (&#x00D7;10<sup>6</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum (&#x00D7;10<sup>6</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum (&#x00D7;10<sup>3</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum (&#x00D7;10<sup>6</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">Cultivar</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">21.7 (11.4)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6.7<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">6.1 (8.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.6<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">31.9 (1.2)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.9<sup>&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.29 (4.6)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.4<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">pH</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">80.3 (42.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">744<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">5.6 (7.3)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">126<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">169 (6.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">316<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.87 (13.7)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">221<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">N-forms</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">50.7 (26.6)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">470<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">60.7 (78.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1361<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2,297 (87.9)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4297<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">4.3 (68.7)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1108<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">pH&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;N-forms</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">28.6 (15.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">264<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.8 (1.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">18<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">67.7 (2.6)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">126<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.47 (7.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">120<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">Error</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">90</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">9.7 (5.1)</td>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">4.0 (5.2)</td>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">48.1 (1.8)</td>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.35 (5.6)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>N-forms refers to the three nitrogen-forms effect; pH refers to the three pH levels effect; N-forms&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;pH refers to nitrogen-form&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;pH levels interaction effects. Values in brackets following the sum of squares for variables indicate the percentage (%) of given variation to total variation. <sup>&#x002A;</sup> and <sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup> indicate significant at 0.05 and 0.01 level, respectively. df refers to the degree of freedom. ns means to no significant difference.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11" sec-type="discussions">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Several studies have provided a general description of plant responses to changes in the AN environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Britto and Kronzucker, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Wang et al., 2019</xref>); however, most of them have considered only a small number of genotypes, in which the effects of soil acidification caused by NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> absorption is neglected, thus only a partial view of the phenomena given. Since wheat ecotypes have been found in a wide range of habitats differing notably in NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> conditions in our previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Wang et al., 2016</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">2019</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">2020</xref>), few studies have reported that using this natural variation among ecotypes as an alternative way to search genes related to NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> tolerance. In the present studies, the responses of wheat to different N forms and pH values was studied by measuring morphological traits and metabolic traits in 31 wheat genotypes. Result showed that cultivar variance explained the largest proportion of total variance in shoot dry weight, plant dry weight, leaf area, nodal root number, total root surface area, total root volume and the free NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> concentration in shoot when wheat seedlings were planted in the solution as NN-6.5, AN-6.5, NN-5.0 or AN-5.0. Previous studies found wheat was sensitive to increased NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> concentration in soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Cao et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Ariz et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Zhu et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Setien et al., 2013</xref>), furtherly, the present results clearly indicated that NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> nutrition and soil acidification significantly reduced biomass accumulation and leaf area in wheat plants. The dry weight of roots was considerably reduced by AN treatment, not only due to limitations in root emergence but also because of a reduction in root length (reduced by 22.3 and 21.7% in maximum seminal root length and nodal root length, respectively). This NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-induced inhibition is related to root growth and development also has been observed by some previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Cramer and Lewis, 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Britto and Kronzucker, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Zhang and Wang, 2012</xref>). Notably, in the present study, the decline was even greater at lower pH levels under AN conditions, but N form still accounted for the largest proportion of variance in root length (<xref rid="tab2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Li et al. (2010</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">2013)</xref> found that nearly 70% of the NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-induced root elongation inhibition was accounted by the cell expansion reduction, which root elongation and development, was mediated by reduced auxin by NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> condition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Li et al., 2011</xref>). In the present study, the nodal root number was maintained or increased under AN but decreased at lower pH. The nodal root number was more strongly affected by variation in pH than by variation in N form (<xref rid="tab2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>), which might be explanted by a higher accumulation of cytokinin in NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-fed roots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Wang et al., 2019</xref>) in our previous study.</p>
<p>As a typical symptom of &#x201C;ammoniacal syndrome,&#x201D; free NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> concentration in plant cells was significantly higher under AN conditions than under NN. This may be associated with the ability of root system to absorb NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Zhu et al., 2009</xref>), the rate of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> efflux from root inside (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Li et al., 2011</xref>), and also NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> assimilation in root cell (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Setien et al., 2013</xref>). The free NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> concentration increased under AN condition but decreased with lower pH in roots, but N forms was the crucial factor as <xref rid="tab4" ref-type="table">Table 4</xref> shown. The uptake of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> depolarizes the plasma membrane, increasing the net proton (H<sup>+</sup>) release from the cell inside to rhizosphere soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Zhu et al., 2009</xref>), furtherly leading to rhizosphere acidification. The H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase in plasma membrane made a decisive contribution to maintain the balance of pH inside and outside cells, which hydrolyzed ATP to pump H<sup>+</sup> out; and an electrochemical gradient generated which could drive the free NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> ions active transport crossing the plasma membrane (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Zhu et al., 2012</xref>). At a low medium root pH, the activity of H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase must be smartly enhanced to pump H<sup>+</sup> outside to adapt to an increased electrochemical gradient, to ensure NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> uptake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Zhu et al., 2009</xref>). Therefore, the low medium pH may inhibit NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> absorption while high pH may facilitate NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> uptake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Brix et al., 2002</xref>). Our results also showed that, in wheat root, the N form was the main reason for the changes in the free NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> concentration which was consistent with the previous studies; however, interestingly, free NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> in wheat shoot varied most by cultivar, which had not been reported before.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p><italic>F</italic>-values in two-way ANOVA analysis of free NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> concentration, soluble sugar, free amino acid concentration and soluble sugar/ free amino acid ratio in shoot or root of 31 wheat cultivars seedlings under different N-sources and pH levels.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Source</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">df</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Free NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> concentration in shoot</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Free NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> concentrations in root</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Soluble sugar concentration in shoot</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Soluble sugar concentration in root</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Free amino acid contents in shoot</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Free amino acid contents in root</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Soluble sugar/free amino acid ratio in shoot</th>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Soluble sugar/free amino acid ratio in root</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum (&#x00D7;10<sup>3</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum (&#x00D7;10<sup>3</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum (&#x00D7;10<sup>3</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum (&#x00D7;10<sup>3</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum (&#x00D7;10<sup>3</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Squares sum (&#x00D7;10<sup>3</sup>)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>F-</italic>value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">Cultivar</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">34.2 (47.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">23<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">6.5 (8.4)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.3<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">11.4 (11.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.6<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.2 (13.3)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6.2<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">17.2 (7.2)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.2<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">5.6 (7.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.6<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">7.09 (6.3)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.9<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.1 (4.8)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.1<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">pH</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">15.3 (21.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">318<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">4.9 (6.3)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">121<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">37.9 (36.6)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">366<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">4.5 (18.6)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">262<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">38.2 (15.9)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">346<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">18.8 (23.4)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">469<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.05 (0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.9&#x2009;ns</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.27 (0.4)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11.2<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">N-forms</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">17.5 (24.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">362<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">60.4 (77.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1471<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">43.4 (42.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">420<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">14.8 (60.9)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">860<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">160 (66.7)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1453<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">43.3 (54.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1080<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">84.3 (75.2)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1407<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">58.6 (90.7)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2356<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">pH&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;N-forms</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.2 (1.7)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">24<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.7 (3.6)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">67<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.4 (1.4)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13.8<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.21 (0.9)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12.2<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">14.7 (6.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">134<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">8.9 (11.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">222<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">15.3 (13.6)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">255<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">0.36 (0.6)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14.77<sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" char=".">Error</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">90</td>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">4.3 (6.0)</td>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.6 (4.7)</td>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">9.3 (9.0)</td>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">1.5 (6.4)</td>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">9.9 (4.1)</td>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">3.6 (4.5)</td>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">5.3 (4.8)</td>
<td/>
<td align="char" valign="top" char=".">2.2 (3.5)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>N-forms refers to the three nitrogen-forms effect; pH refers to the three pH levels effect; N-forms&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;pH refers to nitrogen-form&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;pH levels interaction effects. Values in brackets following the sum of squares for variables indicate the percentage (%) of given variation to total variation. <sup>&#x002A;</sup> and <sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup> indicate significant at 0.05 and 0.01 level, respectively. df refers to the degree of freedom. ns means to no significant difference.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Apart from the ability of plant root to absorb NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, the allocation of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> also depends on the N metabolism process. NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> absorbed by roots is mostly assimilated into amino acids in root cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Masclaux-Daubresse et al., 2010</xref>). In the present study, AN resulted in a remarkedly increase in the free amino acid concentration in shoots and roots, confirming a metabolic adaptation to AN condition, as previously discussed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Lothier et al. (2011)</xref>. The enhanced N compound pool was probably due to both high NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> absorption and increased N assimilation to cope with having solely AN to maintain plant growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Wang et al., 2020</xref>). The negative correlation between free amino acid concentration and soluble sugar concentration in roots and shoots was detected, and AN markedly reduced the soluble sugar/free amino acid ratio, indicating that more N-assimilation occurred in roots. Thus, a sufficient carbon skeleton supply for NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> assimilation is required under AN condition. A higher photosynthetic capacity increases plant NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> assimilation and tolerance, providing C skeletons to fuel the cell respiratory action and translocate more carbohydrates downward to maintain root growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Ariz et al., 2011</xref>). In the present study, a distinct decrease in soluble sugar concentration accrued under AN condition (as the carbon skeleton for NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> assimilation) in 31 wheat cultivars, particularly in the roots (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3</xref>); however, this decrease was lower at pH 6.5 than at pH 5.0, possibly due to the higher photosynthetic capacity at pH 6.5 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Ariz et al., 2011</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2013</xref>), and also the inhibited capacity of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> assimilation. If the capacity of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> assimilation is depressed by low pH, more NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> may accumulate in root and then be transported upward to the shoot, which is proven to be more sensitive to NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Britto and Kronzucker, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Cruz et al., 2006</xref>); this leads to inhibition of photosynthesis and CO<sub>2</sub> fixation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Guo et al., 2007</xref>), resulting in a further reduction in C assimilation.</p>
<p>Some studies have found that the relative assimilation enzyme activity in the GS/GOGAT cycle plays an important role for crops in adaptation to AN condition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">El Omari et al., 2010</xref>). In the present study, GS activity was much increased, but NR activity was decreased by AN (<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">Figure 4</xref>); pH level had the strongest effect on shoot GS activity and N form had the greatest effect on root GS activity. In different tissues of cells, GS exists as isoforms GS1 (found in the cell cytosol) and GS2 (in plastids) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Singh and Ghosh, 2013</xref>). GS1 is the predominant enzyme in non-photosynthetic tissues or root, but slightly presents in green tissues like young stem or leaf (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Simon and Sengupta-Gopalan, 2010</xref>), which metabolic role includes assimilating NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> into amino acids (glutamine) for N transport and distribution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Bernard et al., 2008</xref>). AN treatment increased the GS activity, especially the root GS activity (the predominant isoform GS1). The increased capacity of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>assimilation by GS1 could prevent NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> accumulation in the roots and transport to the shoots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Setien et al., 2013</xref>), but this higher GS activity was not inhibited by the low medium pH significantly, indicating GS1 was insensitive to low pH. GS2 played important roles in NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> re-assimilation during photorespiration and the part of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, which was derived from nitrate reduction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Singh and Ghosh, 2013</xref>), mostly located in the chloroplasts stroma, and its physiological importance has been demonstrated in transgenic plants overexpressing GS2 in leaves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Bernard et al., 2008</xref>). Increased GS2 activity had an enhanced capacity for photorespiration, also retained more than 90% of their photosystem II activity to fight against osmotic stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Bernard and Habash, 2009</xref>). In the present study, a relative increase in shoot GS activity (GS2) may maintain photorespiratory capacity while improving the cultivar&#x2019;s tolerance to NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> stress, but unlike GS1, its activity decreased sharply under low pH, and pH level had the strongest effect on it, indicating GS2 was more susceptible to soil acidification stress.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12" sec-type="conclusions">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In conclusion, we studied the variation in N assimilation capacity of 31 wheat seedlings with respect to plant resistance to NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> stress and rhizosphere acidification (the model as shown in <xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5</xref>). The growth of wheat seedling was seriously inhibited by AN, and this inhibitory effect was enhanced by soil acidification stress. Under AN, crops accumulated more NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> in tissues and more efficiently converted NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> into amino acids, and the N form accounted for the largest proportion of the variance in this process compared to the cultivar and pH level in root, but pH level had the strongest effect in shoot. To select and breed crop cultivars with a greater capacity to adapt to NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N nutrition combined with soil acidification stress in the future, a higher capacity for N assimilation in both shoot and root and the ability to maintain high levels of C, must be a key focus.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>A proposed model of wheat physiological and biochemical responses to ammonium stress and soil acidification.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-13-968707-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>FW: experiments implementation, writing&#x2013;original draft, resources, data curation, methodology, formal analysis, and visualization. JM: supervision and funding acquisition. QW, QY, JYe, JG, and HL: writing&#x2013;original draft, data curation, methodology, formal analysis, and visualization. JYo and XH: conceptualization and writing&#x2013;review and editing. YY, XL, and HK: investigation. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>We acknowledge generous financial support from the &#x201C;Zhejiang Provincial Key Research and Development Program&#x201D; (2020C02030 and 2021C02035); Project of leading talents of scientific and technological innovation in Zhejiang Province (2021R52045); Construction Project of Agricultural Green Development Pilot Support System of Huangyan District (HY202001); and Project of Unification of Water and Soil Science for One Healthy funded by the Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="conf1" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec100" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="sec17" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.968707/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.968707/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.DOCX" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ariz</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Artola</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cabrera</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cruchaga</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maria</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fernando</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>High irradiance increases NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> tolerance in <italic>Pisum sativum</italic>: higher carbon and energy availability improve ion balance but not N assimilation</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>168</volume>, <fpage>1009</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1015</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jplph.2010.11.022</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21371777</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ariz</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Asensio</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zamarreno</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garcia-Mina</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aparicio-Tejo</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moran</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Changes in the C/N balance caused by increasing external ammonium concentrations are driven by carbon and energy availabilities during ammonium nutrition in pea plants: the key roles of asparagine synthetase and anaplerotic enzymes</article-title>. <source>Physiol. Plant.</source> <volume>148</volume>, <fpage>522</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>537</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01712.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23061733</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ariz</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Esteban</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ignacio</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maria</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maria</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fernando</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>High irradiance induces photoprotective mechanisms and a positive effect on NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> stress in <italic>Pisum sativum</italic> L</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>167</volume>, <fpage>1038</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1045</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jplph.2010.02.014</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20434233</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Balkos</surname> <given-names>K. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Britto</surname> <given-names>D. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kronzucker</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Optimization of ammonium acquisition and metabolism by potassium in rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L. cv. IR-72)</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>34</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02046.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19781010</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bernard</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Habash</surname> <given-names>D. Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>The importance of cytosolic glutamine synthetase in nitrogen assimilation and recycling</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>182</volume>, <fpage>608</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>620</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02823.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19422547</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bernard</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moller</surname> <given-names>A. L. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dionisio</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kichey</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jahn</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dubois</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Gene expression, cellular localisation and function of glutamine synthetase isozymes in wheat (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>Plant Mol. Biol.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>89</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>105</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11103-008-9303-y</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18288574</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Britto</surname> <given-names>D. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kronzucker</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> toxicity in higher plants: a critical review</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>159</volume>, <fpage>567</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>584</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1078/0176-1617-0774</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Britto</surname> <given-names>D. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kronzucker</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Ecological significance and complexity of N-source preference in plants</article-title>. <source>Ann. Bot.</source> <volume>112</volume>, <fpage>957</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>963</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aob/mct157</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23884397</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brix</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dyhr-Jensen</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lorenzen</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Root-zone acidity and nitrogen source affects <italic>Typha latifolia</italic> L. growth and uptake kinetics of ammonium and nitrate</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>2441</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2450</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erf106</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12432036</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ni</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Carbon and nitrogen metabolism of an eutrophication tolerative macrophyte, <italic>Potamogeton crispus</italic>, under NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> stress and low light availability</article-title>. <source>Environ. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>74</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>78</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.10.004</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vitousek</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Producing more grain with lower environmental costs</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>514</volume>, <fpage>486</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>489</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature13609</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25186728</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Coskun</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Britto</surname> <given-names>D. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kronzucker</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen transformations in modern agriculture and the role of biological nitrification inhibition</article-title>. <source>Nat. Plants</source> <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>17074</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nplants.2017.74</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28585561</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cramer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lewis</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>The influence of nitrate and ammonium nutrition on the growth of wheat (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic>) and maize (<italic>Zea mays</italic>) plants</article-title>. <source>Ann. Bot.</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>359</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>365</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/anbo.1993.1119</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cruz</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bio</surname> <given-names>A. F. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dominguez-Valdivia</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aparicio-Tejo</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lamsfus</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martins-Loucao</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>How does glutamine synthetase activity determine plant tolerance to ammonium?</article-title> <source>Planta</source> <volume>223</volume>, <fpage>1068</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1080</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00425-005-0155-2</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16292661</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ullah</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Optimizing rates and sources of nutrient input to mitigate nitrogen, phosphorus, and carbon losses from rice paddies</article-title>. <source>J. Clean. Prod.</source> <volume>256</volume>:<fpage>120603</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120603</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>El Omari</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rueda-L&#x00F3;pez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Avila</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crespillo</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nhiri</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>C&#x00E1;novas</surname> <given-names>F. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Ammonium tolerance and the regulation of two cytosolic glutamine synthetases in the roots of sorghum</article-title>. <source>Funct. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>55</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/FP09162</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Enhanced Rubisco activation associated with maintenance of electron transport alleviates inhibition of photosynthesis under low nitrogen conditions in winter wheat seedlings</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>69</volume>, <fpage>5477</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5488</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/ery315</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30239847</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>China must reduce fertilizer use too</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>473</volume>, <fpage>284</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>285</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/473284e</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21593849</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Ammonium nutrition increases photosynthesis rate under water stress at early development stage of rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>296</volume>, <fpage>115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>124</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-007-9302-9</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>W. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W. F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>327</volume>, <fpage>1008</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1010</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1182570</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20150447</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kronzucker</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Balu&#x0161;ka</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Ammonium stress in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>: signaling, genetic loci, and physiological targets</article-title>. <source>Trends Plant Sci.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>107</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>114</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tplants.2013.09.004</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24126103</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kronzucker</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>W.-M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Root growth inhibition by NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> in Arabidopsis is mediated by the root tip and is linked to NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> efflux and GMPase activity</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>1529</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1542</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02162.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Su</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mi</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Shoot-supplied ammonium targets the root auxin influx carrier AUX1 and inhibits lateral root emergence in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic></article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>933</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>946</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02295.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21342208</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref230"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mi</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Ammonium inhibits primary root growth by reducing the length of meristem and elongation zone and decreasing elemental expansion rate in the root apex in arabidopsis thaliana</article-title>. <source>PLOS ONE</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>e61031</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0061031</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21342208</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lothier</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gaufichon</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sormani</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lema&#x00EE;tre</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Azzopardi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morin</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>The cytosolic glutamine synthetase GLN1; 2 plays a role in the control of plant growth and ammonium homeostasis in Arabidopsis rosettes when nitrate supply is not limiting</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>1375</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1390</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erq299</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20959627</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Masclaux-Daubresse</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Daniel-Vedele</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dechorgnat</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chardon</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gaufichon</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suzuki</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen uptake, assimilation and remobilization in plants: challenges for sustainable and productive agriculture</article-title>. <source>Ann. Bot.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>1141</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1157</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aob/mcq028</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20299346</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cramer</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Root nitrogen acquisition and assimilation</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>274</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>36</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-004-0965-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref310"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moore</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stein</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1954</year>). <article-title>A modified ninhydrin reagent for the photometric determination of amino acids and related compounds</article-title>. <source>J. Biol. Chem.</source> <volume>211</volume>:<fpage>907e913</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0021-9258(18)71178-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reis</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Optimizing nitrogen fertilizer use for more grain and less pollution</article-title>. <source>J. Clean. Prod.</source> <volume>360</volume>:<fpage>132180</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21203/rs.3.rs-361734/v1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Setien</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fuertes-Mendizabal</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gonzalez</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma Aparicio-Tejo</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gonzalez-Murua</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Begona Gonzalez-Moro</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>High irradiance improves ammonium tolerance in wheat plants by increasing N assimilation</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>170</volume>, <fpage>758</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>771</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jplph.2012.12.015</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23485260</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Simon</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sengupta-Gopalan</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>The 3&#x2019;untranslated region of the two cytosolic glutamine synthetase (GS1) genes in alfalfa (<italic>Medicago sativa</italic>) regulates transcript stability in response to glutamine</article-title>. <source>Planta</source> <volume>232</volume>, <fpage>1151</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1162</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00425-010-1247-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20706735</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>K. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ghosh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Regulation of glutamine synthetase isoforms in two differentially drought-tolerant rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.) cultivars under water deficit conditions</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Rep.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>183</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>193</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00299-012-1353-6</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23070303</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Van Den Berg</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dorland</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vergeer</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hart</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bobbink</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roelofs</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Decline of acid-sensitive plant species in heathland can be attributed to ammonium toxicity in combination with low pH</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>166</volume>, <fpage>551</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>564</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01338.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15819917</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Impaired electron transfer accounts for the photosynthesis inhibition in wheat seedlings (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> L.) subjected to ammonium stress</article-title>. <source>Physiol. Plant.</source> <volume>167</volume>, <fpage>159</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>172</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ppl.12878</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30430601</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abid</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Adaptation to rhizosphere acidification is a necessary prerequisite for wheat (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> L.) seedling resistance to ammonium stress</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol. Biochem.</source> <volume>108</volume>, <fpage>447</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>455</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.08.011</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27569412</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yong</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Glutamate over-accumulation may serve as an endogenous indicator of tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle suppression under NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> nutrition in wheat (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> L.) seedlings</article-title>. <source>Environ. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>177</volume>:<fpage>104130</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104130</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Plant nitrogen assimilation and use efficiency</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>153</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>182</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105532</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vitousek</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Chinese agriculture: an experiment for the world</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>497</volume>, <fpage>33</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>35</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/497033a</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Effects of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>&#x2212;</sup> on litter and soil organic carbon decomposition in a Chinese fir plantation forest in South China</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>116</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>122</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.12.004</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Di</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Adaptation of plasma membrane H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase of rice roots to low pH as related to ammonium nutrition</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>1428</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1440</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02009.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19558410</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ishikawa</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Subbarao</surname> <given-names>G. V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Interplay among NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> uptake, rhizosphere pH and plasma membrane H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase determine the release of BNIs in sorghum roots - possible mechanisms and underlying hypothesis</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>358</volume>, <fpage>125</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>135</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-012-1151-5</pub-id></citation></ref></ref-list>
</back>
</article>