Arabidopsis LFR, a SWI/SNF complex component, interacts with ICE1 and activates ICE1 and CBF3 expression in cold acclimation

Low temperatures restrict the growth and geographic distribution of plants, as well as crop yields. Appropriate transcriptional regulation is critical for cold acclimation in plants. In this study, we found that the mutation of Leaf and flower related (LFR), a component of SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex (CRC) important for transcriptional regulation in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), resulted in hypersensitivity to freezing stress in plants with or without cold acclimation, and this defect was successfully complemented by LFR. The expression levels of CBFs and COR genes in cold-treated lfr-1 mutant plants were lower than those in wild-type plants. Furthermore, LFR was found to interact directly with ICE1 in yeast and plants. Consistent with this, LFR was able to directly bind to the promoter region of CBF3, a direct target of ICE1. LFR was also able to bind to ICE1 chromatin and was required for ICE1 transcription. Together, these results demonstrate that LFR interacts directly with ICE1 and activates ICE1 and CBF3 gene expression in response to cold stress. Our work enhances our understanding of the epigenetic regulation of cold responses in plants.


Introduction
Cold stress profoundly limits the growth, development, and geographical distribution of plants, and it can significantly threaten crop production and quality (Shi et al., 2018;Ding et al., 2020;Ding and Yang, 2022). However, plants have evolved precise cellular and molecular mechanisms to improve their chance of survival under extreme low temperature conditions (Shi et al., 2018;Ding and Yang, 2022). Understanding how plants adapt to and tolerate cold stress by sensing, transducing, and responding to cold signals is paramount for the breeding of climate-resilient crops and has long been a topic of interest (Shi et al., 2018;Chen et al., 2021). The transmembrane protein COLD1 was identified as a sensor that perceives cold signals and forms a complex with G-protein a subunit1 (RGA1) to mediate cold-induced influx of intracellular Ca 2+ , subsequently leading to the expression of cold-regulated (COR) genes in rice (Oryza sativa) (Ma et al., 2015;Shi et al., 2018). COR genes, including COR15A and Responsive to Desiccation 29, encode proteins that can stabilize membranes against freezing-induced injury (Jaglo-Ottosen et al., 1998;Thomashow, 1999). C-repeat binding factors (CBFs), also known as dehydration-responsive element (DRE)-binding factors (DREBs), are key transcription factors (TFs) that bind to CRT/DRE motifs in the promoters of target COR genes, thus inducing their expression (Stockinger et al., 1997;Gilmour et al., 1998;Jaglo-Ottosen et al., 1998;Liu et al., 1998;Song et al., 2021). CBFs are themselves rapidly upregulated by non-freezing low temperatures . Over the past 20 years, multiple TFs have been shown to regulate CBF expression (Shi et al., 2018). For example, inducer of CBF expression 1 (ICE1) is the one of the well-characterized transcriptional activators of CBF genes (Chinnusamy et al., 2003;Kim et al., 2015;Shi et al., 2018;Ding et al., 2019).
ICE1 is a MYC-like basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) TF that binds directly to a MYC recognition sequence (CANNTG) in the promoters of CBF genes under conditions of cold stress (Chinnusamy et al., 2003;Kim et al., 2015;Tang et al., 2020). In contrast to CBFs and CORs, ICE1 is a constitutively expressed gene with no obvious response to cold stress at the transcriptional level (Chinnusamy et al., 2003;Shi et al., 2018). However, multiple posttranslational modifications, including ubiquitination , sumoylation (Miura et al., 2007), and phosphorylation (Ding et al., 2015;Li et al., 2017;Zhao et al., 2017;Ye et al., 2019), play fundamental roles in the lifespan and turnover of ICE1 at low temperatures (Shi et al., 2018). Interacting partners that are important for the regulation of ICE1 transcriptional activity toward CBFs have also been reported. For example, MYB15 , JASMONATE ZIM-DOMAIN proteins (Hu et al., 2013), and MYC67 and MYC70 (Ohta et al., 2018) were separately isolated as ICE1 interactors; however, they mainly inhibit CBF gene transcription. Interacting factors that are important for ICE1 to activate downstream CBFs are largely unknown.
Components of the SWI/SNF CRC are involved in various biological processes, including plant development, phase transitions, DNA methylation, transposon silencing, pre-miRNA processing, and DNA double-strand breaks (Sarnowska et al., 2016;Ojolo et al., 2018;Thouly et al., 2020). The molecular mechanisms of BRM or SWI3B were unraveled in abscisic acid pathway (Saez et al., 2008;Han et al., 2012;Peirats-Llobet et al., 2016) and environmental stress response, such as salt stress (Vicente et al., 2017) and heat-shock (HS) stress (Brzezinka et al., 2016). Recently, SWI3C was reported to bind and alter the nucleosome occupancy and expression of key factors in cold acclimation, including ICE1, MYB15, and CBF1, under low temperature conditions, revealing a role for SWI/SNF components in cold acclimation (Gratkowska-Zmuda et al., 2020). However, which TFs play important roles in recruiting SWI/SNF complexes to target genes during cold acclimation is unknown.
The LFR gene is essential for leaf and flower development in Arabidopsis (Wang et al., 2012;Lin et al., 2018;Lin et al., 2021). LFR encodes an Armadillo (ARM)-repeat domain-containing protein that is predicted to be a subunit of the SWI/SNF CRC (Wang et al., 2009;Lin et al., 2021;Diego-Martin et al., 2022;Shang and He, 2022). In this study, we found that the disruption of LFR led to reduced freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. We demonstrated that LFR interacts directly with ICE1 in yeast and plant. Meanwhile, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-qPCR and Real Time Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assays demonstrated that LFR can directly bind to and activate the transcription of CBF3, an ICE1 target gene, and, in turn, the COR15A gene. Moreover, ICE1 is a direct target of LFR and LFR is required for ICE1 expression. Together, our results show that LFR directly interacts with ICE1 and activates CBFs expression, revealing the molecular mechanism of the SWI/SNF CRC during cold acclimation in plants.

Plant materials and growth conditions
The wild-type (WT) and mutant Arabidopsis plants used in this study were of the Columbia-0 (Col-0) background. The lfr-1 and lfr-2/+ mutants are described elsewhere (Wang et al., 2009). ice1-2 (SALK_003155; Kanaoka et al., 2008) was a gift from Prof. Shuhua Yang's laboratory. Seeds were surface-sterilized in 75% ethanol and 1% NaClO, washed three times with sterile water, plated on halfstrength Murashige and Skoog (1/2 MS) medium with 1% sucrose and 0.36% agar, and stratified at 4°C in the dark for 3 days. All plants were grown under long-day conditions (16 h of light/8 h of dark) at 22°C.

Plasmid construction and plant transformation
To map the domains of ICE1 (AT3G26744) that are involved in its interaction with LFR, full-length and truncated versions of ICE1 were fused to the GAL4 binding domain (BD) in pGBKT7. Meanwhile, LFR was fused to the GAL4 activation domain (AD) in pGADT7 (Lin et al., 2018). For our Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) and firefly luciferase (LUC) complementation imaging (LCI) experiments, the full-length coding sequence (CDS) of ICE1 and LFR was amplified by PCR from Col-0 cDNA, cloned into pENTRY/D/SD-TOPO (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan), and then fused with the C-terminal half of cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) (cCFP), the C-terminal half of LUC (cLUC), the N-terminal half of yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) (nYFP), or the N-terminal half of LUC (nLUC). The full-length CDS of LFR was fused to nYFP (Lin et al., 2018).

RNA isolation and RT-qPCR analysis
Total RNA was extracted from WT and mutant plants using Trizol reagent (Takara). First-strand cDNA was prepared from 500 ng of total RNA using a PrimeScipt RT Reagent Kit (Takara) and quantified using a CFX96 ™ Connect Real-Time PCR System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with a SYBR Green Kit (Takara). The eIF4A1 gene was used as an internal control. The primers used are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

Freezing tolerance assay
A freezing tolerance assay was performed as described previously (Kim et al., 2015). Approximately 36 plants grown on 1/2 MS medium for 10 days were subjected to freezing conditions; the temperature was set to decrease 1°C/h until it reached -6°C (seedlings did not undergo cold acclimation before freezing) or -9°C (seedlings underwent cold acclimation at 4°C for 4 days before freezing). The plants were then incubated at 4°C overnight in the dark. Next, the plants were allowed to recover for 2 days at 22°C.

Chlorophyll content analysis
The chlorophyll content measurement was performed as described previously (Arnon, 1949;Mostofa et al., 2015). After freezing treatment, the seedlings were allowed to recover for three days at 22°C. Approximately 0.5 g of seedlings from a pool of plants from different plates were dipped in 50 mL aqueous acetone (80%) at 4°C in the dark for 48 h. The light absorption by acetone extracts of chlorophyll at 663 nm and 645 nm are detected in a spectrophotometer. The chlorophyll content was calculated as (20.2 × D645 + 8.02 × D663) × V/(1000 × W); where V = volume of 80% (v/v) acetone (mL), W = weight of sample (g).

Yeast two-hybrid assays
Y2H assays were carried out using the yeast GAL4 system following a standard protocol (Clontech Laboratories, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA). To verify its interaction with LFR, truncated versions of ICE1 [ICE1-2 (the C-terminal region of ICE1, corresponding to amino acids 298-494) and ICE1-3 (the Cterminal region of ICE1, corresponding to amino acids 358-494)] were cloned into pGBKT7 and LFR was fused to the AD in pGADT7. Following verification of the constructs by DNA sequencing, pairs of the plasmids were co-transformed into yeast strain AH109, followed by incubation at 30°C for 3 days. The cotransformed yeast cells were grown on solid medium lacking leucine (Leu) and tryptophan (Trp) (SD/-L-W). Only when the two proteins interacted with each other could the co-transformed yeast cells grow on solid medium lacking Leu, Trp, histidine (His), and adenine (Ade) (SD/-L-W-H-A).

ChIP-qPCR assays
ChIP was performed as described previously (Yamaguchi et al., 2014). Briefly, 600 mg of 8-day-old seedlings were cross-linked using 1% formaldehyde; the reaction was stopped by the addition of 0.125 M glycine. The cross-linked chromatin was then sheared to an average size of~500 bp, and 20 mL of the supernatant was used as the input control. Anti-FLAG antibodies (F3165; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were added to the remaining chromatin for immunoprecipitation followed by qPCR. Data are presented as the fold change relative to the wild type. The primers used are shown in Supplementary Table S1.

Confocal microscopy and fluorescent signal quantification
Primary roots from 8-day-old pLFR : LFR-enhancedYFP (eYFP)/lfr-2 transgenic seedlings with or without cold treatment were stained with 10 mg/ml of propidium iodide (PI) for 5 min and then imaged using an Olympus FV 3000 Confocal Microscope (Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan) with the following settings: equal laser power, gain, and pinhole. Line scan analyses of the YFP and PI signals in the root tip were measured using Image J. For the relative eYFP fluorescence signals quantification, all the eYFP fluorescence signals in each picture were quantified by image J. Twenty roots were measured for each genotype. The signals for cold-treated roots are analyzed relative to the average fluorescence intensity of at time 0 h. Data were analyzed using Prism 8.0.

Disruption of the SWI/SNF component LFR leads to hypersensitivity to cold stress
To determine the function of the SWI/SNF component LFR in freezing tolerance, we evaluate the freezing tolerance phenotype of 10-day-old wild-type (WT, Col-0) and lfr-1 seedlings grown on 1/2 MS medium under non-acclimated (NA) or cold-acclimated (CA) conditions. The NA seedlings were subjected to freezing stress at -6°C for 1 h. Under this condition, the lfr-1 mutant showed reduced freezing tolerance with a significantly lower survival rate and chlorophyll content compared to WT after freezing treatment ( Figures 1A-C). This defect was successfully rescued in pLFR : LFR-3FLAG/lfr-1 transgenic lines, which showed no obvious difference compared to the WT control ( Figures 1A-C). The CA seedlings were acclimated at 4°C for 4 days and then subjected to freezing stress at -9°C for 1 h. The lfr-1 mutant also displayed freezing-sensitive defects under CA conditions ( Figures 1D-F), and the defects were complemented in pLFR : LFR-3FLAG/lfr-1 transgenic lines (Figures 1D-F). Thus, LFR is essential for freezing tolerance at the seedling stage under both CA and NA conditions.
To confirm the function of LFR in freezing tolerance, we subjected 3-week-old lfr-1 and lfr-2 (a strong sterile allele of LFR, segregated from lfr-2+/-) mutant plants to freezing stress in soil. The mutants were subjected to freezing stress at -4 or -5°C for 1 h and then returned to a growth chamber set at 22°C for 7 days. In terms of survival, lfr-1 and lfr-2 both displayed a freezing-sensitive phenotype (Figures 1G-J).
Taken together, these results indicate that LFR is a positive regulator of freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis.
LFR is essential for cold-induced CBFs and COR expression in plants under cold stress ICE1, CBFs, and downstream COR genes are important players in the response of plants to cold stress; thus, we next assessed the transcript levels of ICE1, CBF1, CBF2, CBF3, and COR15A in plants following low-temperature (4°C) treatment for 3 hours (3 h). Real time RT-qPCR showed that the expression levels of CBF1, CBF2, CBF3, and COR15A were significantly increased by cold treatment (Figures 2A-D). However, the expression levels of CBF1, CBF2, and CBF3 were significantly reduced in lfr-1 compared to Col-0 after cold treatment (Figures 2A-C). Similarly, the transcript level of COR15A was lower in lfr-1 than in Col-0 after low-temperature treatment ( Figure 2D). We also tested the expression levels of these four genes in pLFR : LFR-3FLAG/lfr-1 complemented transgenic line (2-2), and we found that their expression levels were fully or partly rescued in the lfr-1 mutant (Figures 2A-D). We also examined the expression level of ICE1, and found that it was not regulated by cold stress as reported previously ( Figure 2E; Chinnusamy et al., 2003;Shi et al., 2018) ICE1 was downregulated in lfr-1 following cold treatment, and the downregulation of ICE1 was partially rescued in complemented transgenic lines ( Figure 2E). These results suggest that LFR is involved in cold acclimation via the direct or indirect transcriptional regulation of ICE1, CBFs, and COR15A.

LFR interacts directly with ICE1 in yeast and plant
To uncover the molecular mechanism underlying the role of LFR in cold acclimation, we examined Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) data from a previous study (Lin et al., 2021). Interestingly, we noticed that ICE1 was isolated as an interacting partner of LFR. We confirmed this interaction by Y2H, Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC), and firefly luciferase (LUC) complementation imaging (LCI) assays. Because full-length LFR and ICE1 fused to the GAL4 BD showed obvious autoactivation in yeast (Ohta et al., 2018;Lin et al., 2021), truncated ICE1-2 (including the bHLH and ZIP domains) and ICE1-3 (including the ZIP domain) were fused to the BD to produce BD-ICE1-2 and BD-ICE1-3 ( Figure 3A). We then co-transformed yeast strain AH109 with the AD-LFR and BD-ICE1-2 or BD-ICE1-3 plasmids. Yeast colonies co-transformed with AD-LFR/BD-ICE1-2 or AD-LFR/BD-ICE1-3 grew well on selective medium (SD/-L-W-H-A) ( Figure 3B). However, negative control cells did not grow on the selective medium under the same conditions ( Figure 3B). Thus, ICE1 probably interacts with LFR through its C-terminal ZIP domain.
We next conducted a BiFC assay using transiently transformed tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) leaves. GFP signals were detected in epidermal cell nuclei co-expressing nYFP-LFR and cCFP-ICE1; however, no GFP signal was detected in negative control cells coexpressing nYFP-LFR/cCFP or nYFP/cCFP-ICE1 ( Figure 3C). These results indicate that LFR interacts with ICE1 in plant.
We next verified the LFR-ICE1 interaction using an LCI assay. Tobacco leaf areas co-transformed with LFR-nLUC and cLUC-ICE1 emitted light in the presence of luciferin. However, tobacco leaf areas co-transformed with the negative controls (LFR-nLUC/ cLUC or cLUC-ICE1/nLUC or cLUC/nLUC) showed no light emission in the same condition ( Figures 3D, E). These results confirm that LFR interacts with ICE1 in plant. Phenotype analysis of lfr mutant plants and transgenic rescue lines exposed to freezing stress. (A, D) The lfr-1 mutant is sensitive to freezing stress. Representative pictures of 10-day-old seedlings of Col-0, lfr-1, and two complementary lines of pLFR : LFR-3FLAG/lfr-1 (2-2 and 32-8) were subjected to freezing stress under NA (A) or CA (D) conditions. After freezing stress, seedlings were incubated at 4°C overnight in the dark and then were allowed to recover for 2 days at 22°C. Scale bar=1 cm. The survival rates of soil-grown Col-0 and lfr-1 (H) and Col-0 and lfr-2 (J) plants that were subjected to freezing stress (-4 or -5°C) and then allowed to recover are shown. Error bars indicate the SD of three biological replicates. Statistically significant differences are indicated by asterisks (*P<0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001; Student's t-test).

LFR is associated with CBF3 chromatin
Given that CBF3 is a direct target of ICE1 (Ding et al., 2015;Kim et al., 2015;Tang et al., 2020) and LFR interacts directly with ICE1, we speculated that LFR may also bind to the CBF3 gene. ChIP-qPCR assays of pLFR : LFR-3FLAG/lfr-2 complemented transgenic lines were conducted using anti-FLAG antibodies with Col-0 as a negative control. According to a previous report on the ICE1-binding site of CBF3 (Ding et al., 2015), primers for the amplification of three different fragments (P1-P3) of CBF3 chromatin were designed ( Figure 4A). Under normal growth condition, the ChIP-qPCR result showed that LFR binds to CBF3 Error bars indicate the SD of three biological replicates. Statistically significant differences are indicated by asterisks (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001; Student's t-test). eIF4A1 was used as an internal control.
at the P1 and P2 loci ( Figure 4B). After low-temperature treatment, the ChIP-qPCR result showed that LFR binds to CBF3 chromatin at the P2 locus ( Figure 4C). The P1 and P2 loci of CBF3 are also binding sites of ICE1 (Ding et al., 2015;Kim et al., 2015;Tang et al., 2020). Thus, these results demonstrated that CBF3 is a direct target of LFR under normal and cold stress conditions.

LFR is associated with ICE1 chromatin
Because we detected reduced expression of ICE1 in lfr-1 plants, we tested whether ICE1 is also a direct target of LFR. A ChIP-qPCR assay was performed using Col-0 and the pLFR : LFR-3FLAG/lfr-2 complemented transgenic line with anti-FLAG antibodies. Different primers for the amplification of different fragments of the ICE1 locus were designed ( Figure 5A). The ChIP-qPCR results showed that LFR was able to bind directly to the P2 locus of ICE1 at 22°C ( Figure 5B). After cold stress treatment, LFR was associated with the P3 locus of ICE1 ( Figure 5C). Thus, these results demonstrated that ICE1 is also a direct target of LFR with or without lowtemperature treatment.

LFR is negatively regulated by cold stress
To elucidate whether LFR is regulated by cold tress at the transcriptional level, we analyzed cis-regulatory elements in the LFR promoter using PLANTCARE. Five low temperature-responsive element (CANNTG) bound by ICE1 was found in the LFR promoter, indicating that LFR may be regulated by ICE1 or a cold-responsive gene ( Figure 6A). And we indeed detected significant downregulation of LFR in ice1-2 mutant plant The interaction of LFR with ICE1. (A) Diagrams of the truncated ICE1 proteins used in the Y2H assays shown in (B). ICE1-2 and ICE1-3 include the bHLH and ZIP (amino acids 298-494) and ZIP domains (amino acids 358-494), respectively. (B) LFR interacted with ICE1 in the Y2H assay. The assays were carried out using AH109 yeast cells co-transformed with the indicated plasmid pairs (serially diluted 10 -1 , 10 -2 , and 10 -3 ) on synthetic defined medium lacking Ade, His, Leu, and Trp (SD/-L-W-H-A). AD-T/BD-53 and AD-T/BD-Lam were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. (C) nYFP-LFR interacted with cCFP-ICE1 in a BiFC assay carried out in transiently transformed tobacco leaf epidermal cells. Leaves cotransformed with nYFP-LFR/cCFP or nYFP/cCFP-ICE1 served as a negative control. DAPI and GFP fluorescence indicate the nucleus and protein interaction, respectively. Merge corresponds to an overlay of the DAPI and GFP signals. Bar =5 mm. (D) LCI assays were used to test for the interaction of LFR with ICE1 in transiently transformed tobacco leaf epidermal cells. Light emission was observed from tobacco leaves co-expressing LFR-nLUC/cLUC-ICE1, but not from leaves co-expressing the negative controls (LFR-nLUC/cLUC or cLUC-ICE1/nLUC or cLUC/nLUC). (E) The Relative luciferase activity of LCI assay in (D). Error bars indicate the SD of four biological replicates. Statistically significant differences from the nLUC/cLUC control are indicated by asterisks (**P < 0.01, Student's t-test). Figure S1A). And we also checked the transcript level of LFR in plants treated with or without cold exposure at different time points. RT-qPCR showed that LFR was downregulated by cold treatment ( Figure 6B). We also studied the protein level of LFR using pLFR : LFR-eYFP/lfr-2 complemented lines. Furthermore, when the pLFR : LFR-eYFP/lfr-2 lines were held at 4°C, the eYFP signals were reduced, especially after 6 and 24 h of cold stress (Figures 6C-E). Taken together, these results indicate that LFR may be repressed by cold stress.

Discussion
LFR is involved in the transcriptional regulation of the ICE1-CBF-COR cascade Plants have developed sophisticated mechanisms to survive fluctuating ambient temperatures (Shi et al., 2018;Chen et al., 2021). At chilling or freezing temperatures, plants utilize a cascade of TFs to adapt to low-temperature stress (Shi et al., 2018). Among these TFs, ICE1, a constitutively expressed MYC-type TF, activates the expression of CBFs, which subsequently induce the transcription of downstream cold-responsive genes such as CORs, which promote cold tolerance (i.e., the ICE1-CBF-COR cascade) (Shi et al., 2018). However, the interacting factors that are needed for ICE1 to activate CBFs are largely unknown. In this study, we demonstrated that ICE1 is an LFR-interacting partner using Y2H, BiFC, and LCI assays (Figure 3). Disruption of LFR resulted in reduced cold tolerance under both NA and CA conditions, similar to ice1-2 (Figure 1). In addition, the transcript levels of ICE1-CBF-COR cascade TF genes (e.g., ICE1, CBF1, CBF2, CBF3, and COR15A) were all downregulated after cold treatment in lfr plants (Figure 2). Like ICE1, LFR was able to directly bind to the CBF3 locus ( Figure 4). LFR was also found to associate directly with ICE1 chromatin ( Figure 5). Together, our results demonstrate that LFR directly interacts with ICE1 and positively regulates the transcription of genes in the ICE1-CBF-COR signaling pathway.
Interestingly, we also detected significant downregulation of LFR in ice1-2 mutant plants, and we found ICE1-binding sites (i.e., CANNTG) in the proximal region of the LFR promoter ( Figure 6 and Supplementary Figure S1A). Furthermore, using published ChIP-qPCR assay of LFR binding to CBF3 without (B) and with lowtemperature treatment (C). Error bars indicate the SD of three biological replicates. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P<0.001, Student's t-test.
ChIP-seq data for GFP-ICE1 (Tang et al., 2020), we found that ICE1 was enriched at the proximal promoter region and gene body of LFR and ICE1 chromatin (Supplementary Figure S1; Tang et al., 2020). Together with our data showing that ICE1 is not only an interacting factor but also a target of LFR, which tends to bind target (s) via interaction with transcription factor (Lin et al., 2018), these results may indicate that LFR and ICE1 interact physically and form transcriptional feedback loops. It will be interesting to test this possibility in the future.
Although LFR may act as a positive regulator of cold signaling, we found that LFR was repressed after prolonged cold treatment (Figures 6). This is similar to ICE1, which is degraded during longterm cold treatment Ding et al., 2015;Zhao et al., 2017). The cold-induced downregulation of LFR and ICE1 may help balance plant cold responses and growth by preventing detrimental effects on plant growth resulting from the overstimulation of critical freezing tolerance factors (e.g., CBFs and CORs) (Zhao et al., 2017).
The expression of LFR are regulated by cold stress. (A) Cis-element analysis of the LFR promoter. Different cis-elements are indicated by different symbols. CANNTG is the low temperature-responsive element found in the ICE1 binding site. (B) RT-qPCR data showing the transcript level of LFR with (4°C) or without (22°C) cold treatment. RNA was isolated from 8-day-old Col-0 seedlings with or without cold treatment for 0, 3, 6, 12, or 24 h. eLF4A1 served as an internal control. Error bars indicate the SD of three biological replicates. Statistically significant differences are indicated by asterisks. **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001, Student's t-test. (C) Representative YFP signals observed in the roots of 8-day-old seedlings of pLFR : LFR-eYFP/ lfr-2 complemented transgenic lines as detected by confocal microscopy with (4°C, for 3, 6, 12, or 24 h) or without (0 h) cold treatment are shown. PI staining indicates the cell membrane. Scale bar= 50 mm. (D) Line scan analyses of the YFP (green line) and PI (red line) signals corresponding to the yellow lines indicated in (C) (Merge). YFP signals were significantly reduced after cold treatment. (E) Quantification of the YFP fluorescence in (C). Representative data from one of three biological replicates with similar results are shown. Data are shown as the mean ± SD (n=20). ***P < 0.001; Student's t-test.
In addition, we found that the lfr-1 ice1-2 double mutant showed obvious defects in seed germination and greening (Supplementary Figure S2), which may indicate that LFR and ICE1 may also participate in these developmental processes.
The involvement of SWI/SNF CRC in lowtemperature stress Epigenetic factors play critical roles in long-term adaptation to the ambient environment (Miryeganeh, 2021;Chung et al., 2022). However, the exact functions of different CRC components in cold adaptation are unknown. Recently, Gratkowska-Zmuda et al. (2020) provided solid evidence showing that SWI3C of the SWI/SNF complex can directly bind, change the nucleosome occupancy and influence the transcription of ICE1, MYB15, and CBF1 in a temperature-dependent manner. SWI3C was required to activate ICE1 expression at 22°C but not at 14°C, and it repressed the transcription of all three CBF genes. Consistent with the upregulation of CBFs, the swi3c mutant displayed increased freezing tolerance compared to wild type (Gratkowska-Zmuda et al., 2020). However, in this study, we found that ICE1-CBF-COR cascade genes were downregulated in the lfr mutant, which displayed hypersensitivity to freezing. Our previous study showed that LFR interacts with SWI3A/SWI3B, but not SWI3C (Lin et al., 2021). Consistently, LFR together with SWI3A/SWI3B, not SWI3C, were identified in the immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry (IP-MS) data of a recent study of the MINU-associated SWI/SNF (MAS) complex Hernańdez-Garcıá et al., 2022). In addition, a comprehensive characterization of the SWI/SNF complexes by proteomic approaches revealed that SWI3C and LFR are involved in different complexes with specific chromatin accessibility and binding ability for active histone modification (Guo et al., 2022). Thus, the opposite phenotype and differential expression pattern of CBF genes may result from that SWI3C and LFR participate in distinct SWI/SNF complexes with different transcriptional properties. So, it will be interesting to decipher the detailed molecular and genetic interactions between LFR, SWI3C, and the core ATPases of the SWI/SNF complex (BRM, SYD, MINU1, and MINU2), which is of great importance to elucidate the molecular regulatory mechanisms of SWI/SNF complexes in controlling plant response to cold treatment.

FIGURE 7
A working model of the function of the SWI/SNF subunit LFR in cold acclimation. Under low-temperature conditions, the SWI/SNF complex component LFR promotes plant survival by acting as a positive regulator of the ICE1-CBF-COR cascade through its physical interaction with ICE1. The depletion of LFR results in the downregulation of ICE1-CBF-COR cascade genes and cold-sensitive defects.
Arabidopsis LFR encodes an ARM-repeat domain-containing protein (Wang et al., 2009). Phylogenetic analysis of the ARM domain revealed that plant LFR has a common origin with the signature subunits ARID1/2 of the animal SWI/SNF complex (Hernández-Garcıá et al., 2022). Recently, the structural approaches demonstrated that the ARM domain in ARID1 serves as a rigid core in the "Base/Core module" organization and stabilization by directly interacting with the core ATPase and all other Base subunits (He et al., 2020;Mashtalir et al., 2020). Besides, ARID1 is also essential for the efficient nucleosome sliding activity of the SWI/SNF complex (He et al., 2020). However, the molecular weight of Arabidopsis LFR is much lower than its mammalian orthologs, because of the loss of the DNA-interacting AT-rich interaction domain (ARID) (Wang et al., 2009;Hernańdez-Garcıá et al., 2022). Thus, it will be interesting to decipher the biological contribution of plant LFR, to the complex organization, architecture, stability, and nucleosome sliding activity of target genes in plant development and stress in the future.
Taken together, our results demonstrate that the SWI/SNF complex component LFR interacts physically with ICE1 to act as a positive regulator of the ICE1-CBF-COR cascade (Figure 7). This study will aid our understanding of plant-specific epigenetic changes through chromatin remodeling in response to global climate change.

Conclusion
Our findings indicate that the SWI/SNF ATP-dependent CRC component LFR interacts directly with ICE1, and that LFR plays a positive regulatory role in the transcription of ICE1-CBF-COR cascade genes. LFR can bind directly to the promoter regions of ICE1 and CBF3 to regulate their expression and thus participate in the response of plants to low-temperature stress. These results suggest that ICE1 may promote plant survival at freezing temperatures by interacting with the SWI/SNF CRC to activate target gene expression. Our findings provide important information for breeding climate-resilient crops.

Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/ Supplementary Material.

Author contributions
SC and HZ designed the study. TM constructed the plasmids and performed the Y2H, BiFC, LCI, ChIP-qPCR, phenotype analysis, and RT-qPCR assays. SW and JT conducted the ChIP-qPCR, RT-qPCR, and protein level analyses. CS did the phenotype analyses. HG prepared the pLFR : LFR-3FLAG and pLFR : LFR-eYFP transgenic lines. SW, HZ, and SC wrote the manuscript with input from all the co-authors. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 31400240 and 31771351) and the Hebei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (C2020205025).