Plant–plant interactions vary greatly along a flooding gradient in a dam-induced riparian habitat

Plant–plant interactions under extreme environmental stress are still controversial. The stress gradient hypothesis (SGH) proposes that facilitation prevails under extreme environmental stresses, while an alternative view states that facilitation collapses or even switches back to competition at the extreme end of stress gradients. However, how the relationship between plant–plant interaction and periodic extreme flooding stress varies and its underlying mechanism are still unclear in a dam-regulated riparian ecosystem. We established a controlled experiment using two dominant species pairs (Cynodon dactylon–Cyperus rotundus and C. dactylon–Xanthium sibiricum) in the water level fluctuating zone of the Three Gorges Dam to examine their growth responses to the periodic extreme flooding stress. The results showed that as flooding stress increased, the competitive effect of C. dactylon on X. sibiricum shifted to facilitation, whereas the effect of X. sibiricum on C. dactylon maintained a strong inhibition. The plant height of X. sibiricum was the most important driver of the interaction between X. sibiricum and C. dactylon along the flooding gradient. The net effect of C. dactylon on C. rotundus shifted from neutral to negative, and the inhibitory effect of C. rotundus on C. dactylon became stronger at the extreme end of flooding stress. The root biomass of the two species was the key trait regulating their interaction with increasing flooding stress. Overall, the SGH was partially supported along our periodic extreme flooding stress gradient. Aboveground resource (light) might be the dominant factor driving the response of the interaction between annual plants and perennial clonal plants to periodic flooding stress, whereas belowground resource (water and nutrients) was probably the dominant factor for perennial clonal plants. Our study will help to further understand the environmental responses of plant–plant relationships and their regulatory mechanism, and the succession of riparian plant communities under extreme environmental changes, providing a basic theoretical basis and data support for the ecological restoration and management of riparian wetland vegetation.


Introduction
Plant-plant interactions are widely recognized as key processes in constructing plant communities, shaping species distribution, and maintaining biodiversity (Cardinale et al., 2002;Silknetter et al., 2020) and, thus, are currently among the most active research topics in ecology.Such interactions range from competition to facilitation, and environmental changes exert a crucial role in determining the direction of the interactions as well as their intensity and prevalence in a given habitat (Liancourt et al., 2017;Zhang et al., 2018).Despite this general consensus, the effect of extreme environmental stress on plant-plant interactions is still controversial (Soliveres et al., 2015).A better understanding of plant-plant interactions therefore would be crucial to model accurately the effects of extreme environmental changes on species and community assembly (Tylianakis et al., 2008).
The stress gradient hypothesis (SGH), an enduring theory in ecology, proposes that competition prevails in productive environments, but competition gives way to facilitation with increasing environmental stress (Figure 1; Bertness and Callaway, 1994).The original prediction of the SGH (linear model) has been supported by many studies (He et al., 2013;He and Bertness, 2014).However, an alternative view states that facilitation often prevails in intermediately stressful environments and collapses (asymmetrical hump-shape model) or even switches back to competition (symmetrical hump-shape model) at the extreme end of stress gradients, which also has gained empirical support in a variety of natural ecosystems (Maestre et al., 2009;Michalet et al., 2014).The apparently opposing views might stem from inter-study differences in stress types or stress components (single or multiple) or whether the stress gradient is complete.Therefore, more studies need to be conducted to clarify the current debate.According to Burkholder (1952), there are six kinds of interactions between plant species that can grow independently, namely, competition, allelopathy, neutrality, facilitation, reciprocity (or procooperation), and an unnamed interaction (Table 1).However, almost all the current studies only consider the unidirectional effects of nursing plants (neighboring plants) on target plants but do not consider the response of nursing plants at the same time, that is, the mutual effects of plants.Hence, how these bidirectional plant-plant interactions respond to the extreme environmental stress remains unclear.
Functional traits are proxies for plant physiology, morphology, and phenology and, thus, represent important plant functions such as the ability of light capturing (e.g., plant height), water and nutrient uptake (e.g., root biomass), and reproduction (e.g., ramet number and seed mass; Peŕez-Harguindeguy et al., 2013).There is growing consensus that the key functional traits that are the overlaps between response and effect traits can assist in explaining how vegetation-related ecosystem functioning responds to environmental stress (Dı ́az and Cabido, 2001;Lavorel and Garnier, 2002).Response traits are those that are selected by environmental factors and enable plant persistence under fluctuating abiotic environments (Minden and Kleyer, 2015).For example, the salt marsh plant Phragmites australis increases its water use efficiency (leaf d 13 C) to adapt to saline-alkaline stress and elongates shoot height to resist flooding stress (Liu et al., 2018;Ding et al., 2021).Effect traits are those that influence ecosystem functioning (Minden and Kleyer, 2015;Gustafsson and Norkko, 2019) and are now commonly used to refer to traits that affect plant-plant interactions (Schob et al., 2013;Cameron et al., 2019;Herben et al., 2020).As an example, the plant-plant interactions between three pasture plants, Alopecurus pratensis, Agrostis capillaris, and Anthoxanthum odoratum, can be determined as the product of root traits; i.e., the longer the total root length and the specific root length, the stronger the competition between plants (Minden and Venterink, 2019).Although the key functional traits contain "response-impact" information, few studies have used key functional traits to predict the response of plant-plant interactions to environmental stress.
Riparian habitats, as an ecotone, are fragile due to the frequent disturbances from water fluctuation (Nilsson and Grelsson, 1995;Weissteiner et al., 2016).Moreover, dams on large rivers tend to form extreme periodic terrestrial-to-aquatic switching Schematic showing possible variation in the intensity of plant-plant interactions along environmental stress gradient.Facilitative effect may reach an asymptote (plateau), decline to a neutral level (asymmetrical hump shape), or turn into competition (symmetrical hump shape) with increasing environmental stress.Based on figure from Kawai and Tokeshi (2007).
environments (Wang et al., 2022a).Dam-induced extreme flooding stress in winter leads to the extinction of most original terrestrial vegetation, and only a few plants survived because of their strong flood-tolerant seeds or rhizomes (Guo et al., 2013;You et al., 2017;Guo et al., 2019).When exposed in summer, they grow again, thus forming a new wetland ecosystem that is terrestrial in summer and aquatic in winter.This triggers fundamental changes in the structure and functions of riparian plant communities.Therefore, extreme flooding stress induced by periodic water-land alternation is the most important driver of plant community reconstruction in the terrestrial stage of the water level fluctuating zone (WLFZ).The WLFZ of the Three Gorges Dam (TGD) is the largest riparian zone (349 km 2 ) in China, forming on the upper reaches of the Yangtze River after the TGD was completely impounded in 2010 (Lü et al., 2015).Its submerged-exposed fluctuation range is up to 30 m, and it is a typical water-land alternation area (Figure S1; Chen et al., 2020).Hence, the WLFZ of the TGD is an ideal place for exploring the effect of periodic extreme flooding stress on plantplant interactions.
Cynodon dactylon, a cushion-forming gramineous plant, is the current pioneer species in the WLFZ of the TGD (Wen et al., 2017).The interactions between C. dactylon and other dominant species, such as Cyperus rotundus and Xanthium sibiricum, affect the structure and succession of plant communities in the WLFZ (Wen et al., 2017).However, little is known about their interspecific interactions along the increasing flooding gradient.Therefore, we examined the growth responses of the two species pairs, C. dactylon-C.rotundus and C. dactylon-X.sibiricum, to the flooding stress using three types of plant functional traits related to the ability of light capturing, water and nutrient uptake, and reproduction to answer the following questions: 1) how do the interactions of the two species pairs change, and (2) which types of traits mediate the interactions along the flooding stress gradient?First, based on the niche overlap of the three species (Guo et al., 2018), we hypothesized that extreme flooding stress promoted negative but weak plant-plant interactions, either unidirectional or bidirectional, which differed from the SGH.Second, since C. dactylon is a cushion plant and X. sibiricum is a tall plant, the two plants might regulate the interspecific interaction by regulating the aboveground traits related to light acquisition.However, C. rotundus relies on the clonal propagation of tubers to gain growth advantages (Xu et al., 2021), so its clonal traits may be the key trait.

Study area
The study area is located at the upper-mid reaches of Pengxi River, which is one of the largest tributaries of the Yangtze River in China, and covers an area of approximately 55.47 km 2 , accounting for 15.9% of the whole WLFZ of the TGD (Chen et al., 2011).Since the TGD was completely impounded in 2010, the water began to rise in September, reaching the peak level of 150 m above sea level (a.s.l.; 25-m flooding depth above the soil surface) in November, and then starts to recede in the following January, reaching the lowest water level of 175 m a.s.l.(0-m flooding depth) in May (Figure S1).Such a hydrological rhythm is contrary to the flooding patterns of natural rivers where flooding occurred in summer.The Pengxi River catchment belongs to a humid subtropical monsoon climate.The mean annual air temperature is 18.6°C, and the mean annual precipitation is approximately 1,300 mm (Wen et al., 2017).The main soil types are Regosols and Anthrosols (FAO Taxonomy; Ran et al., 2021).The vegetation is dominated by C. dactylon, X. sibiricum, C. rotundus, Bidens frondose, Alternanthera philoxeroides, and Setaria viridis (Wang et al., 2022b).

Experimental design 2.2.1 Field survey
A total of 169 quadrats were investigated across six elevation transects, which included C. dactylon and X. sibiricum or C. dactylon and C. rotundus or all three species in September 2019, 2020, and 2021 when plants reached their peak cover.Transects were set up every 5 m between elevations of 150 and 175 m.In each transect, three quadrats to five quadrats (1 m × 1 m) were chosen randomly.For the three plant species in each quadrat, the percentage cover (0%-100% vertical projection) was estimated.
TABLE 1 Simplified presentation of different interactions between two plant species (A and B) that can grow independently, when they meet or do not meet: disadvantage (−), advantage (+), or indifference (0).

Meeting Not meeting
Species A Species B Species A Species B

Pot experiment
Since the WLFZ of the TGD is flooded in winter and exposed in summer, the stress environment experienced by plants is mainly the flooding stress in winter before plant propagules or seeds germinate.Moreover, the flooding stress and the growth of the plants are separate; that is, plant propagules or seeds experience flooding stress in winter and start to grow as the water recedes.Thus, rhizomes of C. dactylon, seedlings of X. sibiricum, and tubers of C. rotundus were collected across the six elevation transects in May 2020 at the beginning of full exposure of the WLFZ of Baijia River, which is one of the core areas of our study area to achieve the flooding stress condition.Seal rhizomes and tubers were placed in transparent bags with a little tap water to promote sprouting prior to treatments.Seedlings of the three species with a uniform morphology, approximately 2-5 cm high, were planted in pots (20 cm in diameter) with 15-cm-high soil.In order to exclude the influence of different soil physical and chemical characteristics on plant growth, soil within the top 30 cm at 160-165 m altitude was used.The experimental soil was taken from WLFZ of Baijia River and sieved (2 mm) to remove plant roots and debris.
Our treatments included six elevations (175,170,165,160,155, and 150 m) and five neighbor effects (monoculture of X. sibiricum, C. dactylon and C. rotundus, mix culture of X. sibiricum and C. dactylon, and mix culture of C. rotundus and C. dactylon) with three replications (Figure 2).Five seedlings per pot for C. dactylon and C. rotundus (Figures 2B−E) and one for X. sibiricum (Figures 2A, D) were planted based on our observation in the field.The plants were watered every day to maintain the field capacity.The total number of pots was 90 (5 neighbor effect treatments × 6 elevation treatments × 3 replicates).The pot experiments were conducted in a greenhouse of the Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Measurements
At the end of the experiments (8 weeks later), ramet numbers of C. dactylon and C. rotundus, lateral length of C. dactylon, and height of X. sibiricum and C. rotundus were recorded.Aboveground and belowground parts of the three plants were sampled and oven-dried at 70°C to constant weight for at least 48 h.The seed mass of X. sibiricum and the root biomass of the three plants were measured.
Aboveground and belowground biomass were measured to calculate the relative interaction intensity (RII) according to the following formula: RII = (TB mix − TB mon )=(TB mix + TB mon ), where TB mix indicates the total biomass of the target plant cultured with the neighbor plant and TB mon indicates the total biomass of the target plant cultured individually.RII was used to assess the interaction between C. dactylon and X. sibiricum, and C. rotundus, with positive values indicating facilitation, negative values indicating inhibition, and zero values indicating no significant interaction (Armas and Pugnaire, 2005).The higher the absolute value of RII, the stronger the interaction between species.

Statistical analyses
The interactive effects of neighbor species and elevation on functional traits and the effects of elevation on RII were tested using ANOVA.Duncan post-hoc tests were conducted to examine differences between mono-and mix-cultured species and differences between elevations.Structural equation models were used to explore the relative effects of elevation and plant functional traits on RII using piecewiseSEM package in R. Models with an adequate fit (p > 0.05) were considered candidate models.Fisher's C statistic and Akaike's information criterion corrected for small sample size (AICc) were used to evaluate the model (Lefcheck, 2016).The model with the lowest Fisher's C and AICc value was considered the best-fit model.All the above analyses were performed using the software package R 4.1.0(R Core Team, 2021).

Results
3.1 Variations of cover for C. dactylon, X. sibiricum, and C. rotundus along the elevation gradient For species pair C. dactylon and X. sibiricum, as the cover of C. dactylon increased, the change trend of the cover of X. sibiricum was not obvious under 165−175-m elevation (Figures 3A, B), while its The layout of the pot experiment.For Xanthium sibiricum, one seedling per pot (A, D); for Cynodon dactylon and Cyperus rotundus, five seedlings per pot (B-E).

Flooding-induced changes in plantplant interactions of the two species pairs
Extreme flooding stress greatly impacted the interactions between the pioneer species, C. dactylon, and the other two dominant species, X. sibiricum and C. rotundus (Figure 4).As flooding stress increased, the inhibitory effect of C. dactylon on X. sibiricum shifted to a significant boost, whereas the effect of X. sibiricum on C. dactylon maintained a strong inhibition (RII < −0.75).Thus, the interaction between the two species shifted from competition to the unnamed interaction with increasing flooding stress.The net effect of C. dactylon on C. rotundus shifted from neutral to negative, and the inhibitory effect of C. rotundus on C. dactylon became stronger at the extreme end of flooding stress.Thus, the interaction between C. rotundus and C. dactylon shifted from allelopathy to competition with increasing flooding stress.

Changes induced by neighbor species in plant functional traits of target species along the elevation gradient
For X. sibiricum, only elevation significantly affected its plant height, which decreased with decreasing flooding stress.The interaction of neighbor species and elevation significantly affected seed mass.Specifically, the seed biomass of mix-cultured X. sibiricum was the highest at 160-m elevation but the highest at 165-m elevation for mono-cultured X. sibiricum.The effect of neighbor species did not significantly affect any traits (Figures 5A−C; Table 2).For C. rotundus, the neighbor species, C. dactylon, significantly decreased its plant height, ramet number, and ramet biomass at low elevations (Figures 5G−I; Table 2).For C. dactylon, neighbor species, either X. sibiricum or C. rotundus, severely reduced its plant height, ramet number, and ramet biomass and even changed their trends with elevation (Figures 5D−F, J−L; Table 2).

Linkages between plant-plant interactions and plant functional traits
Our results indicated that RII of X. sibiricum cultured with C. dactylon exhibited negative correlations with the plant height of X. sibiricum and root biomass of C. dactylon (all p < 0.01; Figures 6A, C).Meanwhile, the plant height of X. sibiricum was negatively correlated with the RII of C. dactylon cultured with X. sibiricum (p < 0.05; Figure 6D).Seed mass of X. sibiricum and ramet number and root biomass of C. dactylon showed no significant relationships with their RII, respectively (all p > 0.05; Figures 6B, E, F).Although ramet number and ramet biomass of C. dactylon were negatively correlated with the RII of C. rotundus cultured with C. dactylon, it exhibited positive correlations with the RII of C. dactylon cultured with C. rotundus (all p < 0.05; Figures 6H, I, K, L).On the contrary, ramet number and ramet biomass of C. rotundus (except for ramet number) were positively correlated with the RII of C. rotundus cultured with C. dactylon but negatively correlated with the RII of C. dactylon cultured with C. rotundus (all p < 0.05; Figures 6H, I, K, L).Plant height of C. rotundus and lateral length of C. dactylon were not significantly related to their RII, respectively (all p > 0.05; Figures 6G, J).
Further analyses showed that, presumably, light was the key factor driving the response of the interspecific interaction between annual plants and perennial clonal plants to flooding stress, whereas water and nutrients were most likely the dominant factors for perennial clonal plants (Figure 7).The flooding stress and plant height of X. sibiricum co-determined the response of RII of X. sibiricum cultured with C. dactylon under the flooding stress gradient (Figures 6A, 7A).Similarly, the plant height of X. sibiricum was the most important driver of RII of C. dactylon cultured with X. sibiricum under the flooding stress gradient, explaining 27% of the variation (Figure 7C).Root biomass could explain 64% and 89% of the variation in the RII of C. rotundus In our study, the effect of C. dactylon on X. sibiricum shifted from negative to positive with increasing flooding stress, which supports the original SGH, while X. sibiricum maintained a strong inhibition on C. dactylon.Thus, the interaction between the two species shifted from competition to the unnamed interaction (one was promoted and the other was inhibited, Table 1) with increasing flooding stress.The promotion effect under extreme environmental stresses generally comes from the environmental improvement by neighboring plants, thereby alleviating the harm of environmental stress to the target species.C. dactylon is a pioneer species, which facilitates the growth of the plants around by improving soil structure and secreting allelopathic substances (Yuan et al., 2019;Liu et al., 2021).In our pot experiment, the soil was taken from the surface layer of 30 cm at 160-165-m elevation in WLFZ of Baijia River.The site was cultivated land before it was flooded and thus the soil is of good quality.Therefore, we speculate that whether the growth of X. sibiricum is inhibited or promoted may be related to the exudate concentration of C. dactylon.Although the roots, stems, and leaves of C. dactylon can exude allelopathic substances to inhibit the growth of its neighboring plants, low concentrations of exudates have a promoting effect (Yuan et al., 2019).Probably in order to have enough energy to withstand the extreme flooding stress, the high-cost allelopathic effect of C. dactylon is weakened, Relative interaction intensity (RII) for total biomass between Cynodon dactylon and Xanthium sibiricum (A) and between C. dactylon and Cyperus rotundus (B) at different elevations.Different letters indicate significant differences between elevations (p < 0.05).A Duncan post-hoc test was used for multiple comparisons.*** represents RII value significantly different from 0 at p < 0.001; ** represents significant at p < 0.01; * represents significant at p < 0.05; ns, not significant.and the concentration of exudates is reduced.the negative effect of C. dactylon on X. sibiricum shifted to positive with increasing flooding stress.Our results also indicate that the pioneer species enhanced the resilience of X. sibiricum to help them survive together in extreme adversity.
We found that the neutral net effect of C. dactylon on C. rotundus shifted to negative at the extreme end of flooding stress.Such variation in plant-plant interactions under the flooding stress gradient does not support the original SGH but, instead, is more consistent with the symmetrical hump-shape model.Michalet et al.  (2014) stated that the switch to competition was mainly driven by the response of target plants to abiotic stress.However, our result is not driven by the response of C. rotundus to flooding stress but by the neighboring plants, C. dactylon.This is because whether C. rotundus was mono-cultured or mix-cultured with C. dactylon, its biomass did not decrease with increasing flooding stress and even increased but was reduced by the neighbor effect at the extreme end of flooding stress (Figure 5I).The inhibitory effect of C. rotundus on C. dactylon changed from strong to weak, which was consistent with the SGH, but C. rotundus did not exert the promoting effect on C. enhanced, while on C. dactylon, it was gradually weakened.This may be because C. rotundus can secrete allelopathic substances (Zivanai et al., 2019;Xu et al., 2021), and thereby, the growth of C. dactylon has been inhibited.However, the growth of C. dactylon was restored under extreme flooding stress (25 m), which may be because the high-cost allelopathic effect of C. rotundus is weakened due to energy conservation.Instead, the growth of C. rotundus was inhibited by C. dactylon.However, although C. dactylon can also secrete allelopathic substances (Yuan et al., 2019), it is possible that C. rotundus is not affected by its allelopathic substances.Therefore, the effect of C. dactylon on C. rotundus was neutral under weak flooding stress.

The key traits were different for plants of different life forms
In support of our second hypothesis, plant height of X. sibiricum helped predict the interaction between X. sibiricum and C. dactylon along the flooding stress gradient.Specifically, strong flooding stress resulted in lower plant height of X. sibiricum, and the inhibitory effect on both species was subsequently weakened.The decrease in plant height of X. sibiricum may be the result of a tradeoff between vegetative growth and reproductive growth.X. sibiricum is an annual plant, which mainly relies on seed propagation, so during the emergence stage of the WLFZ, it must complete its life history to ensure the continuation of the offspring.However, due to the short exposure time (3-4 months) in high flooding stress sites, X. sibiricum may preferentially allocate more resources to reproductive growth at the expense of vegetative growth such as plant height.X. sibiricum exhibits this trade-off strategy, which may be the memory function caused by its seeds experiencing high-intensity flooding in winter.However, the reduction of plant height probably also weakened the shading effect of X. sibiricum, leading to the weakening of the inhibition between the two species.Interestingly, when X. sibiricum was the target species, flooding stress directly affected the RII, and the effect was greater than that of functional traits, whereas, for the other two clonal plants, there was no such direct effect.Perennial clones reproduce mainly on clonal propagules, and it is not necessary for them to complete a life history during the emergence of the WLFZ.Therefore, compared with perennial clonal plants, annual plants are more strongly affected by flooding stress, resulting in their RII being also regulated by the environment.This suggests that for annuals, it is not enough to focus on not only ontogenesis but also the impact of the environment on plant interaction.
The root system not only is an essential organ for absorbing nutrients and water but also helps plants expand underground space through its mechanical action (Konoplenko et al., 2017;Freschet et al., 2021).Our model showed that the key traits were not the ramet number of C. rotundus or the lateral length of C. dactylon but their ramet biomass, which regulated the interaction between C. rotundus and C. dactylon along the flooding stress gradient, differing from our second hypothesis.Moreover, their root biomass was related to the flooding stress gradient in the opposite way; i.e., the root biomass of C. rotundus was positively correlated with the flooding stress gradient, but that of C. dactylon was negatively correlated.This indicates that the interspecific interaction between the two species might not mainly lie in the competition for aboveground living space and resources but for underground space and resources in dam-regulated riparian ecosystems.In addition, although C. dactylon had no significant effect on the ramet number of C. rotundus (except for 150-m elevation), its ramet number was significantly suppressed by C. rotundus and increased with increasing flooding stress.Thus, the ramet number of C. dactylon was also the key trait, but that of C. rotundus was not.The clonal ramet of C. rotundus mainly relies on underground expanded tubers rich in nutrients such as starch and sugar (Xu et al., 2021).These nutrients may be sufficient for C. rotundus to produce ramets without competing with C. dactylon.However, the rhizomes of C. dactylon are low in nutrients and may need to compete with C. rotundus for nutrients in the soil to produce ramets.Hence, it is not very surprising that root biomass and ramet number are the most responsive traits and influence the interspecific interaction for the grass family simultaneously and that only root biomass is the key trait for the sedge family in damregulated riparian ecosystems.

Conclusions
In summary, plant-plant interactions varied greatly under extreme flooding stress in WLFZ of the TGD.The interaction between X. sibiricum and C. dactylon shifted from competition to the unnamed interaction (one was promoted and the other was inhibited), while that between C. rotundus and C. dactylon shifted from allelopathy to competition with increasing flooding stress.The key traits were different for plants of different life forms.Driving force analysis indicated that the light acquisition trait, plant height, determined the plant-plant interaction that included an annual plant and that the nutrient and water acquisition trait, root biomass, mainly regulated the plant-plant interaction between perennial clonal plants along the flooding stress gradient.Interestingly, when X. sibiricum was the target species, flooding stress explained the largest part variation of the plant-plant interaction, suggesting that the annual plant performance in the community was affected by abiotic factors directly more than biotic factors.Our study will help to understand where positive or negative plant-plant interactions prevail and reveal the mechanisms underlying their dynamics under periodic extreme flooding stress in a dam-regulated riparian ecosystem.In addition, a potential issue that might have affected our results is a lack of data on the extreme flooding stress (i.e., 30-m flooding depth) in our study area.In future studies, stronger flooding stress data should be added to further validate our results.
cover decreased or kept at a low level (<20%) under 150−165-m elevation (Figures 3C−E), possibly showing an inhibitory effect on X. sibiricum.Differing from X. sibiricum, the cover of C. rotundus decreased or kept a low level (<20%) as the cover of C. dactylon increased under 155−175-m elevation (Figures 3F−I), possibly showing an inhibitory effect on C. dactylon, while its change trend was not obvious under 150−155-m elevation (Figure3J).Due to the uncertainty of the plant-plant interaction and additional factors contributing to their variations in the field, further controlled experiments in the greenhouse were needed to determine the interaction of the two species pairs.
FIGURE 3 Variation of cover for Cynodon dactylon and Xanthium sibiricum (A-E) and for C. dactylon and Cyperus rotundus (F-J) at different elevation intervals in September 2019−2021.
cultured with C. dactylon and C. dactylon cultured with C. rotundus under the flooding stress gradient (Figures 7B, D), respectively.4 Discussion 4.1 Plant-plant interactions are greatly affected by periodic extreme flooding stress FIGURE 5 Responses of plant height/lateral length, ramet number/seed biomass, and root biomass of Xanthium sibiricum (A-C), Cynodon dactylon (D-F, J-L), and Cyperus rotundus (G-I) to elevation.Values are means ± s.e.(n = 3).Different capital and lower letters denote differences between elevations (p < 0.05) for mono-and mix-cultured species.A Duncan post-hoc test was used for multiple comparisons.*** represents the value of trait mixcultured significantly different from that mono-cultured at p < 0.001; ** represents significance at p < 0.01; * represents significance at p < 0.05; ns, not significant.
FIGURE 6Relationships of relative interaction intensity between Cynodon dactylon (blue squares, A-F) and Xanthium sibiricum (red triangles, A-F) and between C. dactylon (blue squares with crossing, G-L) and Cyperus rotundus (green circles, G-L) with plant height/lateral length, ramet number/ seed biomass, and root biomass.
FIGURE 7 Structural equation models exploring the relative effects of predictors on relative interaction intensity for Xanthium sibiricum cultured with Cynodon dactylon (A), Cyperus rotundus cultured with C. dactylon (B), and C. dactylon cultured with X. sibiricum (C) and C. rotundus (D).The width of each arrow is proportional to the strength of the association.The numbers adjacent to the arrows are standardized path coefficients.Red solid lines denote significant positive relationships, and blue denotes significant negative relationships.*** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, and * p < 0.05.R 2 indicates the proportion of the variance explained by predictors in the model.The goodness-of-fit statistics for the structural equation model are shown below each model.

TABLE 2
Two-way ANOVA results for the effect of neighbor species (N) and elevation (E) on plant height/lateral length, ramet number, and root biomass of Xanthium sibiricum, Cynodon dactylon cultured with X. sibiricum (C.dac_X.sib), and Cyperus rotundus and C. dactylon cultured with C. rotundus (C.dac_C.rot).
F, F test; p, significance of F test.P-Values in bold mean statistically significant effects.