@ARTICLE{10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00515, AUTHOR={Balas, Benjamin}, TITLE={Contrast Negation and Texture Synthesis Differentially Disrupt Natural Texture Appearance}, JOURNAL={Frontiers in Psychology}, VOLUME={3}, YEAR={2012}, URL={https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00515}, DOI={10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00515}, ISSN={1664-1078}, ABSTRACT={Natural textures have characteristic image statistics that make them discriminable from unnatural textures. For example, both contrast negation and texture synthesis alter the appearance of natural textures even though each manipulation preserves some features while disrupting others. Here, we examined the extent to which contrast negation and texture synthesis each introduce or remove critical perceptual features for discriminating unnatural textures from natural textures. We find that both manipulations remove information that observers use for distinguishing natural textures from transformed versions of the same patterns, but do so in different ways. Texture synthesis removes information that is relevant for discrimination in both abstract patterns and ecologically valid textures, and we also observe a category-dependent asymmetry for identifying an “oddball” real texture among synthetic distractors. Contrast negation exhibits no such asymmetry, and also does not impact discrimination performance in abstract patterns. We discuss our results in the context of the visual system’s tuning to ecologically relevant patterns and other results describing sensitivity to higher-order statistics in texture patterns.} }