Front. Psychol. Frontiers in Psychology Front. Psychol. 1664-1078 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00234 Psychology General Commentary Article Corrigendum: Cognitive training with casual video games: points to consider Baniqued Pauline L. 1 * Kranz Michael B. 1 Voss Michelle W. 2 Lee Hyunkyu 3 Cosman Joshua D. 4 Severson Joan 5 Kramer Arthur F. 1 1Department of Psychology, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Urbana, IL, USA 2Department of Psychology, University of Iowa Iowa City, IA, USA 3Brain Plasticity Institute San Francisco, CA, USA 4Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN, USA 5Digital Artefacts, LLC Iowa City, IA, USA

*Correspondence: banique1@illinois.edu

This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology.

Edited and reviewed by: J. Toby Mordkoff, University of Iowa, USA

 20 03 2014 2014 5 234 18 02 2014 02 03 2014 Copyright © 2014 Baniqued, Kranz, Voss, Lee, Cosman, Severson and Kramer. 2014

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A Corrigendum on Cognitive training with casual video games: points to consider by Baniqued PL, Kranz MB, Voss MW, Lee H, Cosman JD, Severson J, et al. (2014) Front. Psychol. 4:1010. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.01010 attention working memory reasoning fluid intelligence video games cognitive training casual games transfer of training

The original publication contained an error that does not impact the significant findings and does not invalidate any conclusions derived from the study. In the WM-REAS 2 group, we inadvertently included data from one subject whose performance in the Attention Network Test (ANT) during post-testing met the exclusionary criteria. This resulted in an exaggerated negative transfer effect for the WM-REAS 2 group. After excluding this subject, the WM-REAS ANT-selective attention (also ANT-visual attention in the original manuscript) data is comparable with the other training groups (Figure 1). The results are consistent after reanalysis, with no significant transfer effect in ANT-selective attention [F(3, 154) = 0.004, p = 1.000, η2p < 0.001]. The reported association between sleep and ANT-selective attention in the original publication is no longer significant (r = 0.177, p = 0.310). The authors deeply regret this error.

Transfer effects for divided attention.