%A Revuelta,Javier
%A XimÃ©nez,Carmen
%D 2017
%J Frontiers in Psychology
%C
%F
%G English
%K multidimensional nominal response model,item response theory,standardized generalized discrepancy measure,Posterior predictive model evaluation,Bayesian inference,multivariate analysis
%Q
%R 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00961
%W
%L
%N 961
%M
%P
%7
%8 2017-June-16
%9 Methods
%+ Javier Revuelta,Department of Psychology, Autonoma University of Madrid,Madrid, Spain,javier.revuelta@uam.es
%#
%! Bayesian Inference for the Multidimensional Nominal Response Model
%*
%<
%T Bayesian Dimensionality Assessment for the Multidimensional Nominal Response Model
%U https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00961
%V 8
%0 JOURNAL ARTICLE
%@ 1664-1078
%X This article introduces Bayesian estimation and evaluation procedures for the multidimensional nominal response model. The utility of this model is to perform a nominal factor analysis of items that consist of a finite number of unordered response categories. The key aspect of the model, in comparison with traditional factorial model, is that there is a slope for each response category on the latent dimensions, instead of having slopes associated to the items. The extended parameterization of the multidimensional nominal response model requires large samples for estimation. When sample size is of a moderate or small size, some of these parameters may be weakly empirically identifiable and the estimation algorithm may run into difficulties. We propose a Bayesian MCMC inferential algorithm to estimate the parameters and the number of dimensions underlying the multidimensional nominal response model. Two Bayesian approaches to model evaluation were compared: discrepancy statistics (DIC, WAICC, and LOO) that provide an indication of the relative merit of different models, and the standardized generalized discrepancy measure that requires resampling data and is computationally more involved. A simulation study was conducted to compare these two approaches, and the results show that the standardized generalized discrepancy measure can be used to reliably estimate the dimensionality of the model whereas the discrepancy statistics are questionable. The paper also includes an example with real data in the context of learning styles, in which the model is used to conduct an exploratory factor analysis of nominal data.