%A Malagoli,Chiara %A Usai,Maria Carmen %D 2018 %J Frontiers in Psychology %C %F %G English %K working memory,emotional regulation,behavioural outcomes,adolescence,individual differences %Q %R 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00844 %W %L %M %P %7 %8 2018-May-29 %9 Original Research %# %! WM in adolescence: relationship with emotional regulation and behavioural outcomes. %* %< %T WM in Adolescence: What Is the Relationship With Emotional Regulation and Behavioral Outcomes? %U https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00844 %V 9 %0 JOURNAL ARTICLE %@ 1664-1078 %X Adolescence is a fundamental transition phase, marked by physical, social, cognitive and emotional changes. At this stage in development two contrasting phenomena take place: brain changes cause a sensitivity to emotional aspects (Dahl, 2004); while also control processes register as well impressive improvements (e.g., Hooper et al., 2004; Best and Miller, 2010). The study is aimed to investigate the relationship between a core cognitive feature such as working memory (WM) (Diamond, 2013) and complex abilities such as emotion regulation (ER) and behavioral self-reported outcomes using a structural equation model approach. A sample of 227 typically developed adolescents between 14 and19 years of age (148 females; mean age in months 202.8, SD 18.57) participated in this study. The following tasks and self-reports were administered in a 45-min test session at school: Symmetry Span task (Kane et al., 2004). Reading Span task (Daneman and Carpenter, 1980), Mr. Cucumber (Case, 1985); Youth Self-Report (YSR, 11–18 years, Achenbach and Rescorla, 2001); Difficulties ER Scale (DERS, Gratz and Roemer, 2004; Italian version by Giromini et al., 2012). Results showed that difficulties in ER correlated with WM: high levels of ER difficulties are associated with low WM efficiency while no significant contributions of these predictors was observed on externalizing or internalizing symptoms. This study showed a significant relationship between self-reported difficulties in ER and WM, while no significant contribution of the considered predictors was showed on the outcomes, adding knowledge about how behavioral and emotional self-reported outcomes may relate to these processes.