Original Research ARTICLE
How Art Therapists Observe Mental Health Using Formal Elements in Art Products: Structure and Variation as Indicators for Balance and Adaptability
- 1Faculty of Health Care, Department of Arts Therapies, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, Netherlands
- 2KenVaK Research Centre for the Arts Therapies and Psychomotricity, Heerlen, Netherlands
- 3Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, Netherlands
- 4Music and Performing Arts Department, MA Music Therapy and Drama Therapy, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- 5MA Dance and Music Therapy, Codarts University for the Arts, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- 6School of Psychology, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- 7Pro Persona, Centre for Mental Health Care, Nijmegen, Netherlands
In clinical practice, formal elements of art products are regularly used in art therapy observation to obtain insight into clients’ mental health and provide directions for further treatment. Due to the diversity of formal elements used in existing studies and the inconsistency in the interpretation, it is unclear which formal elements contribute to insight into clients’ mental health. In this qualitative study using Constructivist Grounded Theory, eight art therapists were interviewed in-depth to identify which formal elements they observe, how they describe mental health and how they associate formal elements with mental health. Findings of this study show that art therapists in this study observe the combination of movement, dynamic, contour and repetition (i.e., primary formal elements) with mixture of color, figuration and color saturation (i.e., secondary formal elements). Primary and secondary elements interacting together construct the structure and variation of the art product. Art therapists rarely interpret these formal elements in terms of symptoms or diagnosis. Instead, they use concepts such as balance and adaptability (i.e., self-management, openness, flexibility, and creativity). They associate balance, specifically being out of balance, with the severity of the clients’ problem and adaptability with clients’ strengths and resources. In the conclusion of the article we discuss the findings’ implications for practice and further research.
Formal elements of art products such as line, color and shape are often used in art therapy observation in youth as well as adult mental health care. The art therapists’ underlying assumption seems to be that formal elements reflect clients’ mental health problems (e.g., Cohen et al., 1986; Gantt and Tabone, 1998; Hacking, 1999; Conrad et al., 2011; Schoch et al., 2017). Observing formal elements could thus be used by art therapists to formulate their perspective on clients’ functioning, strengths and challenges and support their contribution to the descriptive diagnosis. This could help the art therapist to decide whether art therapy and which art interventions may be beneficial. This interest in the use of formal elements is reflected in a large number of studies (e.g., Elbing and Hacking, 2001; Stuhler-Bauer and Elbing, 2003; Betts, 2005, 2006; Mattson, 2009; Kim et al., 2012; Eytan and Elkis-Abuhoff, 2013; Thyme et al., 2013). These studies, however, demonstrate a wide range of opinions concerning which formal elements are relevant and how they are described and interpreted in art therapy observation and assessment. Also, prior studies used a different number of formal elements. In the diagnostic drawing series (DDS) (Cohen et al., 1986; Cohen, 1986/1994, unpublished) twenty-two formal elements are included. In the formal art therapy scale (FEATS) (Gantt and Tabone, 1998) fourteen formal elements are incorporated, in the descriptive assessment of psychiatric art (DAPA) (Hacking, 1999) five categories, and in the Nürtinger Rating Scale (NRS) (Elbing and Hacking, 2001; Stuhler-Bauer and Elbing, 2003) four categories of twenty-four formal elements. Even if similarities in these formal elements can be recognized, the way they are described differs largely. For example, regarding line some emphasize the quality of the line (Gantt and Tabone, 1998), whereas others emphasize the presence of line versus the absence of line (Cohen et al., 1986). Regarding color, the intensity of color is included in the DAPA (Hacking, 1999), whereas others include the mixture of color (Cohen et al., 1986). Additionally, diversity can be recognized in the methods used to observe and assess the formal elements. In some studies, open observation of formal elements is used to inquire into an in-depth understanding of the individual client (Stuhler-Bauer and Elbing, 2003; Thyme et al., 2013; Pénzes et al., 2015, McNiff in Gilroy et al., 2012). In other studies, specific assessment methods are used such as the DDS, in which an art therapist assesses three drawings that are made with colored pastels according to three different tasks, or the FEATS, in which a drawing made with markers is assessed.
The same kind of diversity is seen in the way formal elements are interpreted. In previous studies, formal elements are related to distinctive psychological features. In most studies, formal elements are related to disorders of the Diagnostic and Statistic Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) or the International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (ICD) (Cohen et al., 1986; Gantt and Tabone, 1998; Hacking, 1999; Kim et al., 2014). Whereas in more recent studies formal elements are related to clients’ strengths (Hinz, 2009, 2015; Pénzes et al., 2014, 2015) in line with perspectives on positive mental health (Huber et al., 2016) and recovery (Anthony, 1993). These perspectives have found their way into art therapy observation and assessment (Betts in Gilroy et al., 2012; Wilkinson and Chilton, 2013).
Thus, until now, literature has been far from consistent in presenting tools or suggestions directed toward the clinical use of formal elements in art therapy observation and assessment. Despite this ambiguous evidence, formal elements are very often used in clinical practice. Art therapists use existing art therapy assessment instruments in their own way, frequently developing their own assessment methods with their own favorite formal elements (Claessens et al., 2016). It is, however, unclear which formal elements art therapists find relevant in their clinical practice, how they observe and interpret them, and how art therapists relate formal elements to mental health. In this study, we will systematically investigate these aspects by interviewing art therapists with many years of experience in clinical practice. If indeed art therapists in clinical practice use formal elements in a consistent way, the outcomes of the present study may contribute to the ‘body of knowledge’ regarding if and how formal elements can be used in art therapy observation and assessment to estimate clients’ mental health, and direct further treatment.
Materials and Methods
In this study, we used Constructivist Grounded Theory (Charmaz, 2014). This qualitative approach inductively generates theory grounded in empirical data. Data was gathered through interviews with eight very experienced art therapists and analyzed by initial, focused and theoretical coding principles of qualitative analysis (Charmaz, 2014). See Figure 1.
In total eight art therapists were purposely selected from the existing professional network of a research center of arts therapies in the Netherlands1. Participating art therapists were women with 15- >25 years experience with different populations and settings in adult mental health care. Based on the principle of theoretical sampling (Corbin and Strauss, 2008; Charmaz, 2014) they had different nationalities (Dutch, United States, and United Kingdom), diverse training backgrounds and art therapy perspectives. This diversity provided a critical exploration and variation of the concepts investigated in this study. All art therapists gave written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
The participating art therapists were asked to observe six art products of five clients with diverse mental health issues (see Table 4). Two art products (3 and 6) were made by one client. The art products were randomly selected from a larger sample of 138 products made by 48 clients of 11 art therapists. All clients gave written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All three paintings were made with acrylic paint on paper (size: 50 × 40 cm.) over a period of 3 weeks. For the first and second painting, the clients received standardized instructions to paint a landscape; for the third painting clients were asked to create a painting without instruction. For all paintings, clients received the same paint, color palette, brushes and pencils. The sampled clients had just started treatment in art therapy in a range of mental health settings. In this stage of treatment it is common in the Netherlands that the head of treatment (usually a psychologist or psychiatrist) formulates a preliminary DSM-diagnosis that might change during the course of assessment. Art therapists do not formulate a DSM-diagnosis. In a later phase they formulate an art therapy diagnosis and contribute to a general descriptive diagnosis.
The art therapists were interviewed using “intensive interviews” (Charmaz, 2014). The aim of these interviews was to explore in detail which formal elements the art therapists observed and how they described mental health. In particular how exactly they related formal elements to what aspects of mental health. The first six interviews took place in the work setting of the art therapist. Interview seven and eight were conducted on Skype. All interviews were videotaped. During the live interviews the art products were spread out randomly. During the Skype interviews the art products were discussed in numerical order. The interviews were conducted with an interview guide based on the research questions of this study. First, every art therapist was asked to look at the art products separately, describe the formal elements and describe the first impression she gained about the client. Second, more general questions were asked about how she would define the concept of mental health. Finally, every art therapist was asked how she would relate the formal elements of the art product to various aspects of mental health.
This guide was used as a flexible structure to ensure detailed exploration of the art therapists’ view on formal elements of the art product, mental health and the interrelatedness of formal elements and mental health. Open and investigative questions (Charmaz, 2014) were asked to pinpoint these relationships in order to gain an understanding of the diagnostic value of formal elements of art products in art therapy observation; which formal elements exactly are important and how are they related to exactly which aspects of clients’ mental health?
After full transcription of the interviews, text fragments were organized according to the topics of the interview guide. These topics, (1) formal elements, (2) mental health and (3) relationship between formal elements and mental health, were used as ‘sensitizing concepts’ (Charmaz, 2014). First, incident-by-incident coding took place; within each interview, each art product separately was analyzed. This analysis resulted in a set of codes.
In the next stage these initial codes were further categorized by comparative analysis (see dotted line in Figure 1); input of all therapists and over all art products were compared and preliminary categories emerged. Codes about which most therapists agreed or that had similarities were clustered into theoretical codes regarding the formal elements, mental health and their interrelatedness. Based on the initial codes, these categories were described. Within the coding rocess, it became clear that some of these categories, such as several formal elements, were mentioned by almost all therapists about every art product; these became main theoretical categories. Some other categories were mentioned less often; these became sub theoretical categories. In this stage, a first perspective emerged on how the formal elements of the art product were related to mental health.
Theoretical coding conceptualized the interrelatedness between the categories. Comparative analysis over the eight interviews supported synthesizing and organizing the links between the theoretical categories. Within this process some of the main theoretical categories were merged into core concepts. For example, the primary and secondary formal elements (see Figure 2) became main categories under the core concept “structure.” Of others, it became clear that they were related -but separated- main theoretical categories, such as flexibility and creativity under the core concept of “adaptability.” This led to a theoretical framework, conceptualizing the relatedness between sub- and main categories and core concepts. All were defined in detail.
The whole process of analysis was peer debriefed to ensure that the codes, categories and concepts fit the data. The results of analysis were member checked with all art therapists on two occasions; (1) after initial coding; no additions or changes were made and (2) after focused coding; the art therapists gave some refinements and elaborations that were incorporated into the analysis.
Initial coding showed that art therapists used a variety of words (codes) related to the formal elements of the art products. Focused coding clustered these codes into seven categories (see Table 1). The formal elements “movement,” “dynamic,” “contour,” and “repetition” were mentioned most frequently. “Mixture of color,” “color saturation” and “figuration” were only mentioned by the art therapists when the element was dominantly present or absent within the art product.
Structure and Variation
The art therapists stated that formal elements might enhance or weaken each other and that the combination determined the “structure” of the art product (see Table 1). Structure varied between very high and very low structured.
Therapist 6: “I look for presence or absence of formal elements; which ones dominate? And how are they connected; the interplay determines the character of the art product.”
Therapist 5: “The structure of the art product consists of the interconnectedness of several formal elements and is indicative for how stuck a person is, how much space there is for change and that influences treatment.”
Focused and theoretical coding of all art products showed that highly structured art products consisted of the presence of “contour” and “repetition” (shown as “+” in Figure 2) in combination with the absence of “movement” and “dynamic” (shown as “-” in Figure 2). Absence of “mixture of color” and presence of “color saturation” enhanced the amount of structure. “Figuration” contributed sometimes to a highly structured product (e.g., art product 3), at other times not (e.g., art product 1).
Low structured art products consisted of the presence of “movement” and “dynamic” in combination with the absence of “contour” and “repetition.” Low structure was further weakened by the presence of “mixture of color” and absence of “figuration.” “Color saturation” contributed sometimes to a low structured art product (e.g., art product 5), at other times not (e.g., art product 1 or 2).
The presence or absence of “movement,” “dynamic,” “contour” and “repetition” determined the structure of the art product. These formal elements were mentioned most frequently. “Mixture of color,” “figuration” and “color saturation” reinforced or weakened this structure. To indicate the conciseness of “movement,” “dynamic,” “contour” and “repetition” in comparison with the other formal elements, the distinction between “primary” and “secondary” formal elements was introduced (see Figure 2).
How formal elements are combined and how strongly they are present appeared to determine the amount of structure art therapists perceived in the art product. The more dominant a formal element was present or absent, the more clear the structure of the art product was high or low.
The art therapists were in agreement about clearly structured art products. The dominant present or absent formal elements were consistently mentioned first. The art therapists were less consistent about art products that were less clearly structured. It seemed as if the art therapists hesitated and needed more time describing the formal elements. This was for example the case with art product 6 (see Table 4) that showed high structure but was far less structured than art product 1:
Therapist 2: “Somehow the others [art products] are more clear to me, here nothing jumps out. It is all the same, just the color is a bit different, and nothing is placed in the foreground. Those flowers feel a bit strange. It is not connected somehow.”
Therapist 5: “It has something threatening, almost as if it comes rolling toward me. It is a mountain, but it rolls in my direction. Probably accidentally painted in this manner…sort of. I don’t know…there are actually just four shapes with a cloud and some dots. Kind of duality, contradiction within the art product.”
Also, clear high or low structured art products demonstrated less variation. Variation emerged as a core concept by clustering categories related to the diversity within the art product (see Table 1). Variation existed when a range of formal elements was present or when there was diversity within one or more formal elements (e.g., diversity in movement by the presence of short and long, bended and straight lines). All therapists mentioned the amount of variation in each art product explicitly.
Therapist 8: About art product 1: “There is little variation; no mixing of colors, not playing with them, out of the bottle and more over he keeps them very separate. Lines are repetitive, no fluidity, absolutely boxed-off, rigid distinctions, no overlapping, juncture position of colors.”
Anyone who expects that art therapists in these interviews used diagnostic terms such as depression and anxiety disorder in order to describe mental health will be disappointed. Art therapists were exceptionally reserved in using these terms and did not explicitly relate art products to psychopathology. However, art therapists did consider the art product as an important basis for clients’ mental state and consequently the possibilities and focus for treatment. Clients’ possibilities were mentioned more explicitly than their mental problems.
Clients’ Mental State: Balance
The art products provided cues to the art therapists about the clients’ inner world. They seemed to use an implicit conceptual model about the client’s balance. To describe this, they used a variety of terms. Most of them were related to “feeling” or “thought” (see Table 2).
With regard to feeling, all therapists mentioned emotion regulation and nearly all therapists focused on the client’s potential to regulate emotions. Art therapists extracted cues about feelings and emotions from the art products. Sometimes they referred to positive emotions (happy, lively), more often to negative emotions (anger, sadness, fear). It was as if they scanned the art product for cues with regard to the content of the emotion as well as the intensity of expression. Art therapists differentiated between clients who tended to express impulsively, i.e., physical acted on feeling, and clients that tended to express emotional, i.e., allowing and experiencing feeling.
Therapists 5: “Well, here [art product 4] it is about expressing feeling by using variation in color and movement and it seems to be about a memory or a story, whereas here [art product 5] it seems to be just about expressing emotions in an impulsive, more physical manner.”
Next, art therapists used words that could be related to thought. This category included thoughts, cognitions and cognitive processes such as planning, organizing, analyzing and structuring. Art therapists did not refer to the content of the cognitions but mostly to a continuum of cognitive control (see Table 2).
Balance existed when allowing, experiencing and expressing emotions and cognitive control were in proportion to each other. However, many clients showed themselves to be out of balance, either because of the high levels of emotion or because of the high levels of cognitive control.
Adaptability: Toward More Balance
Observation of a client’s tendency toward either “thought” or “feeling” enabled the art therapists to gain a perspective on clients’ actual balance. The art therapists stressed the importance to search for cues to estimate the client’s potential ability to achieve balance. This was related to clients’ “adaptability.” Adaptability was clustered into four categories; “self-management,” “flexibility,” “openness,” and “creativity” (see Table 3).
The combination of self-management, flexibility, openness and creativity determined clients’ adaptability. Art therapists were less positive about the adaptability of clients who were observed as struggling with being flexible, open, self-managed and creative (see Table 4).
Therapist 7: “Persons that are willing in an unfamiliar situation, to put themself out, willing to learn and make mistakes and learn form their mistakes shows me something about their prognosis in therapy. Being able to face this task and adapt, that tells me something about their ability to learn and adapt in real life and that is a good prognosis.”
Art therapists in this study agreed that gaining a perspective on the client’s balance and the presence of adaptability gave direction to the formulation of treatment goals (see Table 4).
Therapist 2: “When someone over overregulates his emotions, tries to control them, treatment then is often focused on losing a bit of that control, being able to play, move and act and allow to feel. When someone under regulates his emotions, treatment is often focused on creating structure and calming down.”
Formal Elements and Mental Health
Through theoretical coding, relationships between formal elements and mental health were conceptualized in which the core concepts were related; structure was related to clients’ balance and variation was related to adaptability (see Figure 3).
Structure and Balance
Based on the observed primary and secondary formal elements, the extent to which they were present/absent and in which combination, art therapists ascertained the structure of the art product on a continuum from high to low. The structure was related to clients’ balance; based on one art product, art therapists were able to estimate the client’s balance. Art therapists preferred to observe at least three art products to observe if each art products had similar amounts of structure over time. If the structure of the art products did not change over time, their initial estimation of clients’ balance was confirmed. The art therapists assumed that art products with clear high or low structure indicated that the client was more out of balance. Three general patterns could be recognized; (1) highly structured art products were related to much “thought” and less “feeling”, (2) low structured art products were related to more “feeling” and less “thought” and (3) art products that alternated between high and low structure were related to much “thought” and much “feeling”.
Variation and Adaptability
Art therapists observed the amount of variation of the art product, which they related to “adaptability”. Variation was associated with experimentation, exploration, playfulness, taking risks, and discovery (see Table 1). These aspects were related to openness, self-management, flexibility and creativity; the categories of adaptability. Generally, more variation was related to more adaptability until a “turning point”. This means that art therapists assumed an “optimum” amount of variation; absent or limited variation as well as over- presence of variation was related to limited adaptability. Art therapists stressed their preference to observe at least three art products to observe variation within art products over time. Art therapists assumed that art products with limited or no variation over time indicated less adaptability. Variation over several art products indicated openness, willingness to learn and adapt. If variation was present over different art products art therapists were more optimistic about clients’ prognosis, as they associated adaptability with potential to change in therapy.
Balance, Adaptability and Further Treatment
The aim of treatment was to restore or develop balance between “thought” and “feeling” and to enhance adaptability. The art therapists in this study formulated the focus of treatment mainly on the estimated balance and potential adaptability. The focus of treatment directed the choice for art interventions. In general, the art therapists estimated that clients with a lot of cognitive control (i.e., thought) might benefit from more “affective” interventions, whereas clients with difficulties regulating their emotions might benefit from more “cognitive” interventions. Art therapists stressed the importance of the observation of clients’ individual position on the continuum of balance to choose the art interventions specific to the client’s needs.
Art therapists found clients’ balance and adaptability indicative for treatment duration and prognosis. They were more optimistic about the treatment duration and prognosis of clients who were more balanced and adaptive. Art therapists were alert to clients lack of balance and adaptability. They emphasized the importance of clients’ capacity to deal with change; they stated that a clear lack of balance and adaptability might have a function in survival and daily functioning. Therefore, treatment might take longer and prognosis, i.e., the expected amount of change, might be more limited.
Based on art products made with acrylic paint and the instruction to either paint a landscape or create a painting without instruction, all the art therapists in this study focus on four primary (movement, dynamic, contour, and repetition) and three secondary (mixture of color, figuration and color saturation) formal elements in art therapy observation. This implies that the art therapists in this study agree largely on the relevance of formal elements as well as their hierarchy. These seven formal elements show some resemblance to formal elements incorporated in existing studies on formal elements in art therapy e.g., “mixture of color” is also incorporated in the DDS, “color saturation” resembles “color intensity” of the DAPA, and “figuration” can be related to “color fit” of the FEATS. Some existing studies point out that individual elements mean nothing unless considered as a cluster (Gantt, 2001) or use a “profile” related to specific disorders, such as in the DDS. The findings of this study add to these studies by conceptualizing specific combinations of formal elements that construct the “structure” of the art product.
The art therapists in this study use the formal elements to estimate how clients make their art product. This is in line with existing studies in which it is theorized that formal elements reveal how the client makes the art product. It is this relation between formal elements and the making process that could explain why they provide information about clinically significant emotional and behavioral concerns of clients (Hinz, 2009; Conrad et al., 2011). In previous studies this was specified by the concept of material interaction (Pénzes et al., 2014, 2015).
With regard to the art therapists’ perspective on mental health, results of this study show that art therapists do estimate potential psychopathology. They rarely use symptoms or specific diagnoses used in DSM or ICD. Instead, they use concepts as balance and adaptability (i.e., self-management, openness, flexibility, and creativity). Emphasis on adaptability, i.e., resources and strengths, is in line with the perspective of positive health (Huber et al., 2016) in which health is defined as “the ability to adapt and self manage physical, emotional and social challenges in life.” This perspective shows resemblance to the “recovery approach”(Anthony, 1993), which focuses on fulfilling, meaningful life beyond the limitations of illness or symptomatology and emphasizes the empowerment of clients’ and their potential for change and growth.
The art therapists’ perspective on mental health certainly influences the way the formal elements are interpreted. Not relating the formal elements to symptoms and/or disorders, transcends any classification and is in line with other perspectives on mental health such as those of Siegel (Siegel, 2010, 2012, 2017) and Cozolino (2017) who also stress the importance of integrating “thought” and “feeling” to achieve, restore or maintain mental health and well-functioning.
If the art therapists observe clients being out of balance - which is more or less always the case in health care situations- they actively start searching for the elements of variation. Variation is associated with making choices, play, experimentation and exploration of the art materials. This relates to what in the literature is referred to as ‘material interaction’ (Pénzes et al., 2014, 2015). Material interaction refers to the clients’ dialog with art materials’ properties. Variation is subsequently related to self-management, openness, flexibility and creativity, i.e., adaptability. Hinz (2009); Lusebrink (2010), and Bucciarelli (2011) also pointed out creativity might be a sign of mental health, which emerged….however, they did not explore this further.
Balance and adaptability are conceptualized as two separate concepts; out of balance indicates the severity of the problems, whilst adaptability indicates present or potential resources which allow change in therapy. One might say that being out of balance refers to “mental-illness” and variation to “positive mental-health.” However, the therapists in this study often mention them together and point out that these concepts are closely interrelated, i.e., the severity of the problem and the potential resources of the client are seen as two sides of the same coin. This raises the question whether and to what degree balance and adaptability are independent, distinct, concepts. Literature on this matter is divided. Some studies question the distinction between mental illness and mental health (adaptation) (Lukat et al., 2016; Van Erp Taalman Kip and Hutschemaekers, 2018). The seven formal elements that emerged in this study might enable art therapists to gain perspective on the strengths and resources as challenges of clients. The findings add to studies that relate formal elements either to specific disorders or clients’ strengths and recourses in art therapy observation and assessment. The use of formal elements in art therapy observation provides a broader perspective on the client as a person.
Critical Reflection and Implications for Practice and Future Research
This study conceptualizes three patterns of balance in combination with the variation in the art product. These patterns provide perspective on clients’ strengths, resources and challenges. It may be of interest in future research to investigate if and how the formal elements may differentiate in the way they are present between clients with diverse mental health issues.” Due to the limited number of art products included in this study, future research might include more art products to investigate if the same patterns emerge or if these patterns can be differentiated, specified or added.
Additionally, it may be useful to incorporate more than one art product of each client in future research to investigate if that leads to a more precise and differentiated observation of variation and adaptability. Even though all therapists largely agreed on clients’ variation and adaptability, they preferred more than one art product to estimate the variation.
Art therapists of three nationalities participated in this study. They cannot represent current international perspectives on art therapy assessment (Gilroy et al., 2012). However, they agreed on the formal elements and concepts of mental health. Findings of this study could be a valuable starting point to replicate the study in a broader international scope. Future research may address the potential of these concepts in contributing to the international current literature.
Existing studies on formal elements show that the formal elements observed are likely to change in response to the given task and the art media used. One could question if other formal elements would have emerged in this study when art products were made with a different task and art media. For example, the formal element “filled space” might have emerged when art products would have been made on larger paper size, with smaller brushes and/or allowing more time.
Nonetheless, the properties of acrylic paint, allow the observation of those formal elements which enable the art therapists to observe the structure and variation of the art product. The ability to observe the structure and variation related to the level of balance and adaptability may support art therapists to formulate treatment goals to suit the individual needs and potential and to choose those art interventions that enhance or develop the client’s balance and adaptability. Previous studies point out the therapeutic potential of diverse art material properties to achieve a more “affective” or “cognitive” experience to enhance “thought” or “feeling” (Hinz, 2009; Hyland Moon, 2010; Snir and Regev, 2013; Pénzes et al., 2014). The therapeutic value of experiential interventions is pointed out in many recent studies (e.g., Cozolino, 2017; Porges and Flores, 2017). Future research may address the use of art interventions to generate different affective or cognitive experiences.
Formal elements are frequently used in clinical practice. In this study, we addressed two questions, namely which formal elements art therapists observe, and how they interpret them in terms of mental health. Findings add to the current body of knowledge. They show that the combination of seven formal elements construct the structure and variation of the art product and are indicative of clients’ level of balance and adaptability. Art therapists in this study gain insight into clients’ mental health through these concepts. This insight supports the art therapists in formulating treatment goals that suit the individual needs and potential and to choose those art interventions that ameliorate the client’s balance and adaptability.
With regard to ethics approval, this study was conducted in 2016 and an ethics approval was not required as per our Institution’s guidelines and national regulations (Dutch “Law of medical research involving Human Subjects” [“Wet Medisch-wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (WMO)].”
The participants of this study consisted of art therapists, which were interviewed with regard to their professional method of observation of art products, their perspective on mental health and how they used the formal elements of the art product to gain insight in mental health. Prior to the interviews these art therapists were provided with written information with regard to the research aims and procedure. The interviews had duration of 1–1.5 h, in which the art therapists were interviewed on a familiar and professional topic. This research procedure was not considered as a risk of bringing the art therapist any possible harm. Written informed consent was obtained from all therapists in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
With regard to the inclusion of the clients’ art products, written informed consent was obtained from all clients in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Making art products with specific instructions as used in this study is common in clinical practice of art therapy and therefore considered as not harmful for clients.
IP developed the research design, conducted the research, and first authored this article. SvH, DD, and GH supervised the development of the research design and research process, and co-authored this article.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The authors would like to acknowledge all involved therapists and clients and Dieuwertje Abeling-Boselie for peer-debriefing. This study is a part of a Ph.D. research project at KenVaK and the Radboud University.
Claessens, S., Annemans, F., Pénzes, I., and van Hooren, S. (2016). Meetinstrumenten in de beeldende therapie. Een inventariserend onderzoek naar de kennis en het gebruik van meetinstrumenten. [Measurement instruments in art therapy. An inventory study at knowledge and use of measurements]. Tijdschrift Vakther. 12, 27–34.
Cohen, B. M., Hammer, J., and Singer, S. (1986). The diagnostic drawing series (DDS). A systematic approach to art therapy evaluation, and research. Arts Psychother. 15, 11–21. doi: 10.1016/0197-4556(88)90048-2
Conrad, S. M., Hunter, H. L., and Krieshok, T. S. (2011). An exploration of the formal elements in adolescents’ drawings: general screening for socio-emotional concerns. Arts Psychother. 38, 340–349. doi: 10.1016/j.aip.2011.09.006
Elbing, U., and Hacking, S. (2001). Nürtinger beurteilungsskala und diagnostic assessment of psychiatric art: neue wege zur evaluation der bilder von kunsttherapie-patienten. [Nürtinger rating scale and diagnostic assessment of psychiatric art: new ways for the evaluation of art therapy patients]. Z. Musik Tanz Kunstther. 12, 133–144. doi: 10.1026//0933-68188.8.131.52
Huber, M., van Vliet, M., Giezenberg, M., Winkens, B., Heerkens, Y., Dagnelie, P. C., et al. (2016). Towards a ‘patient-centered’ operationalisation of the new dynamic concept of health: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open 2016:e010091. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010091
Kim, S-i., Ghil, J-H., Choi, E-Y., Kwon, O.-S., and Kong, M. (2014). A computer system using a structured mandala to differentiate and identify psychological disorders. Arts Psychother. 41, 181–186. doi: 10.1016/j.aip.2014.02.003
Kim, S., Kang, H., Chung, S., and Hong, E. (2012). A statistical approach to comparing the effectiveness of several art therapy tools in estimating the level of a psychological state. Arts Psychother. 39, 397–403. doi: 10.1016/j.aip.2012.07.004
Lukat, J., Margraf, J., Lutz, R., van der Veld, W. M., and Becker, E. S. (2016). Psychometric properties of the positive mental health scale (PMH-scale). BMC Psychol. 41:8. doi: 10.1186/s40359-016-0111-x
Lusebrink, V. B. (2010). Assessment and therapeutic application of the expressive therapies continuum: implication for brain structures and functions. Art Ther. J. Am. Art Ther. Assoc. 27, 168–177. doi: 10.1080/07421656.2010.10129380
Pénzes, I., Hooren, S., van Dokter, D., Smeijsters, H., and Hutschemaekers, G. (2015). Material interaction and art product in art therapy assessment in adult mental health. Arts Health 8, 213–228. doi: 10.1080/17533015.2015.1088557
Porges, S. W., and Flores, P. J. (2017). Group psychotherapy as a neural exercise: bridging polyvagal theory, and attachement theory. Int. J. Group Psychother. 67, 202–222. doi: 10.1080/00207284.2016.1263544
Schoch, K., Gruber, H., and Ostermann, T. (2017). Measuring art: methodical development of a quantitative rating instrument measuring pictorial expression (RizbA). Arts Psychother. 55, 73–79. doi: 10.1016/j.aip.2017.04.014
Stuhler-Bauer, A., and Elbing, U. (2003). Die phänomenologische bilderfassung: ein kunsttherapeutisches instrument. [The phenomenological picture analysis: an art therapy instrument]. Z. Musik Tanz Kunstther. 14, 32–46. doi: 10.1026//0933-68184.108.40.206
Thyme, K. E., Wiberg, B., Lundman, B., and Graneheim, U. H. (2013). Qualitative content analysis in art psychotherapy research: concepts, procedures, and measures to reveal the latent meaning in pictures and the words attached to the pictures. Arts Psychother. 40, 101–107. doi: 10.1016/j.aip.2012.11.007
Van Erp Taalman Kip, R., and Hutschemaekers, G. (2018). Health, well-being and psychopathology in a clinical population: structure and discriminant validity of mental health continuum short form (MHC-SF). J. Clin. Psychol. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22621 [Epub ahead of print].
Keywords: art therapy observation, formal elements, art product, adult mental health, qualitative study, grounded theory
Citation: Pénzes I, van Hooren S, Dokter D and Hutschemaekers G (2018) How Art Therapists Observe Mental Health Using Formal Elements in Art Products: Structure and Variation as Indicators for Balance and Adaptability. Front. Psychol. 9:1611. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01611
Received: 29 April 2018; Accepted: 13 August 2018;
Published: 05 September 2018.
Edited by:David Gussak, Florida State University, United States
Reviewed by:Amy Bucciarelli, University of Florida, United States
Sheila Lorenzo De La Peña, Florida State Hospital, United States
Copyright © 2018 Pénzes, van Hooren, Dokter and Hutschemaekers. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ingrid Pénzes, Ingrid.firstname.lastname@example.org