Front. Psychol. Frontiers in Psychology Front. Psychol. 1664-1078 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02338 Psychology Perspective Dose–Response Matters! – A Perspective on the Exercise Prescription in Exercise–Cognition Research Herold Fabian 1 * Müller Patrick 1 2 Gronwald Thomas 3 Müller Notger G. 1 2 4 1Research Group Neuroprotection, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany 2Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany 3Department Performance, Neuroscience, Therapy and Health, Medical School Hamburg, University of Applied Sciences and Medical University, Hamburg, Germany 4Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Magdeburg, Germany

Edited by: Ana Bengoetxea, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium

Reviewed by: Jon Irazusta, University of the Basque Country, Spain; José Augusto Marinho Alves, Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, Portugal

 *Correspondence: Fabian Herold, fabian.herold@dzne.de

This article was submitted to Movement Science and Sport Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

 01 11 2019 2019 10 2338 29 04 2019 01 10 2019 Copyright © 2019 Herold, Müller, Gronwald and Müller. 2019 Herold, Müller, Gronwald and Müller

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

In general, it is well recognized that both acute physical exercises and regular physical training influence brain plasticity and cognitive functions positively. However, growing evidence shows that the same physical exercises induce very heterogeneous outcomes across individuals. In an attempt to better understand this interindividual heterogeneity in response to acute and regular physical exercising, most research, so far, has focused on non-modifiable factors such as sex and different genotypes, while relatively little attention has been paid to exercise prescription as a modifiable factor. With an adapted exercise prescription, dosage can be made comparable across individuals, a procedure that is necessary to better understand the dose–response relationship in exercise–cognition research. This improved understanding of dose–response relationships could help to design more efficient physical training approaches against, for instance, cognitive decline.

 physical activity cognition personalized training personalized medicine neuroplasticity neuroprotection Introduction

In the last decades, the average time that people are physically active has decreased dramatically in Western countries (Owen et al., 2010; Church et al., 2011; Copeland et al., 2015), and physical inactivity has been named as a big, if not even the biggest, health problem of the twenty-first century (Blair, 2009). Remarkably, physical inactivity is associated with impaired cognitive functions (Aichberger et al., 2010; Falck et al., 2016; Ku et al., 2017; Tan et al., 2017) and higher risk of risk of neurodegenerative diseases (e.g., dementia) in the aging population (Laurin et al., 2001; Rovio et al., 2005; Ravaglia et al., 2008; Hamer and Chida, 2009; Paillard-Borg et al., 2009; Abe, 2012; Bowen, 2012; de Bruijn et al., 2013; Grande et al., 2014; Paillard, 2015). In order to counteract such negative effects of physical inactivity, an increase in the habitual physical activity level, which is typically engendered through a regular engagement in physical exercises, is empathically recommended (Hillman et al., 2008; Bherer et al., 2013; Erickson et al., 2013, 2014; Hötting and Röder, 2013; Paillard, 2015; Müller et al., 2017; Liu-Ambrose et al., 2018; Herold et al., 2019). It has been well demonstrated in the literature that a single bout of physical exercises (Chang et al., 2012a; Basso and Suzuki, 2017; Herold et al., 2018b; McSween et al., 2018; Moreau and Chou, 2019) as well as repeated sessions of physical exercises in the form of a training intervention (e.g., endurance training) (Colcombe et al., 2006; Erickson et al., 2011; Voelcker-Rehage et al., 2011; Herold et al., 2018b, 2019; Falck et al., 2019; Stern et al., 2019) induce substantial neurocognitive changes. Based on such positive effects of physical exercises and/or physical training on brain plasticity and on cognition, it is not surprising that many scientific disciplines (e.g., medicine, psychology, neuroscience, and sport science) pay attention to this research field. Although these different scientific disciplines use different approaches to understand the relationship between physical exercises and/or physical training and the central nervous system, it is undoubted that all of them are based on an appropriate exercise prescription that specifies exercise (e.g., exercise intensity, exercise duration) and/or training variables (e.g., frequency of training sessions) (Lightfoot, 2008; Williams et al., 2019). Furthermore, exercise prescription is the key for dosing (Wasfy and Baggish, 2016; Pontifex et al., 2018) and for individualization of acute physical exercises and physical training (Lightfoot, 2008). Individualization (personalizing) is an emerging approach aiming at maximizing the efficiency of an intervention by accounting for the interindividual heterogeneity in the response to acute physical exercises and/or physical training (Lightfoot, 2008; Buford et al., 2013; Barha et al., 2017b; Müller et al., 2017, 2018; Gallen and D’Esposito, 2019). Notably, what parameters are optimal to prescribe the best exercise for an individual is extensively discussed in the literature (Katch et al., 1978; Weltman et al., 1989, 1990; Gass et al., 1991; Meyer et al., 1999; Hofmann and Tschakert, 2010; Scharhag-Rosenberger et al., 2010; Mann et al., 2013; Weatherwax et al., 2016), but not all scientific disciplines investigating exercise–cognition are taking this issue into account sufficiently (Gronwald et al., 2018b, 2019a; Suwabe et al., 2018). Hence, the purpose of this article is to shed light on differences in exercise prescription and their relation to the dose and the interindividual heterogeneity in neurocognitive outcome measures.

Physical Activity, Physical Exercises, Physical Training – Where Are the Differences?

Prior to going more deeply into the topic of physical activity, physical exercise, and/or physical training, it is necessary to clarify these terms because they represent different concepts while it is, unfortunately, common behavior to use them interchangeably (Caspersen et al., 1985; Budde et al., 2016). “Physical activity” is defined as muscle-induced bodily movement that increases energy expenditure above ∼1.0/1.5 MET (metabolic equivalent of task; 1 MET = 1 kcal (4,184 kJ) × kg–1 × h–1) (Caspersen et al., 1985; Ainsworth et al., 2000; Budde et al., 2016). Hence, the term physical activity is a hypernym (i) that covers a wide range of physical activities that are conducted on a regular or unregular basis in a relatively unstructured and unplanned manner and (ii) that includes specific, planned, and structured forms of physical activities that are known as physical exercises (Caspersen et al., 1985; Howley, 2001; Budde et al., 2016). Physical exercises should be distinguished based on temporal characteristics into acute physical exercise (single bout) and chronic physical exercises (repeated bouts of acute exercises) (Scheuer and Tipton, 1977; Budde et al., 2016). A single bout of physical exercise is commonly referred to as an “acute (single) bout of physical exercise” or as “acute physical exercises” (Budde et al., 2016; Herold et al., 2018b). Furthermore, chronic physical exercises can be denoted as “physical training” when they are conducted regularly in a planned, structured, and purposive manner with the objective to increase (or maintain) individual capabilities in one or multiple fitness dimensions (Scheuer and Tipton, 1977; Caspersen et al., 1985; Howley, 2001; Budde et al., 2016; Herold et al., 2018a). In essence, distinguishing and using these terms carefully allows a better classification and interpretation of observed effects and of the underlying (neuro)biological mechanisms (Budde et al., 2016).

 “Responder” or “Non-responder” – That Is the Question

Since every human is unique, there is a considerable amount of within-individual (intra-individual) (Katch et al., 1982; Coggan and Costill, 1984; Bagger et al., 2003; Skurvydas et al., 2010; Faude et al., 2017; Chrzanowski-Smith et al., 2019; Voisin et al., 2019) and between-individual (interindividual) heterogeneity (Karavirta et al., 2011; Chmelo et al., 2015; Bonafiglia et al., 2016; Greenham et al., 2018) in acute psychophysiological response(s) to the same acute physical exercises and/or long-term adaptions to the same physical training. Especially, the interindividual heterogeneity gained attention in the research of the recent years (Buford and Pahor, 2012; Buford et al., 2013; Mann et al., 2014; Sparks, 2017; Pickering and Kiely, 2018b; Ross et al., 2019) and is commonly observed in studies dealing with endurance (cardiovascular) training (Chmelo et al., 2015; Bonafiglia et al., 2016), resistance (strength) training (Hubal et al., 2005; Chmelo et al., 2015; Ahtiainen et al., 2016), or combined training (consisting of endurance and resistance training) (Karavirta et al., 2011). In order to account for this interindividual heterogeneity, the concept of (i) “responder” [also referred as “individuals with high sensitivity” (Booth and Laye, 2010)] and (ii) “non-responder” [also referred as “individuals with low-sensitivity” (Booth and Laye, 2010), limited responders (Burley et al., 2018), or “individuals which did not respond” (Pickering and Kiely, 2018b)] was introduced, however, with varying definitions (Booth and Laye, 2010; Buford and Pahor, 2012; Scharhag-Rosenberger et al., 2012; Buford et al., 2013; Mann et al., 2014). While the definition and methods to classify responders and non-responders are currently discussed in the literature (Atkinson and Batterham, 2015; Hecksteden et al., 2015, 2018; Bonafiglia et al., 2018, 2019a,b; Swinton et al., 2018; Atkinson et al., 2019; Dankel and Loenneke, 2019), it is relatively accepted that (i) not all outcome variables are affected equally by the responsiveness state (e.g., be a responder or non-responder) (Sparks, 2017; Pickering and Kiely, 2018b, 2019b; Toigo, 2019), (ii) measurement errors are inevitable in repeated measurements and are caused, for instance, by random biological fluctuations that do not represent a meaningful change in the outcome variable (Atkinson and Nevill, 1998; Scharhag-Rosenberger et al., 2012; Atkinson and Batterham, 2015; Williamson et al., 2017; Pickering and Kiely, 2019a), and (iii) some responses are likely to be transient, causing uncertainty regarding the time course of the responsiveness state (Pickering and Kiely, 2018b). Hence, the following working definitions can be proposed (see Table 1). Regarding the response to acute physical exercises and/or physical training, (i) responders are individuals who exhibit, at a certain time point, changes in a variable of interest that are above (below) a distinct threshold, and (ii) non-responders are individuals who exhibit, at a certain time point, changes in a variable of interest that are below (above) a distinct threshold. There is ongoing vivid discussion on how to define these critical thresholds (Atkinson and Batterham, 2015; Swinton et al., 2018; Atkinson et al., 2019; Dankel and Loenneke, 2019) and whether further subgroups should be established (Dankel and Loenneke, 2019). For instance, “adverse responders” (Bouchard et al., 2012) or “negative responders” (Leifer et al., 2014), have be defined as individuals who exhibit, at a certain time point, in response to acute physical exercise or physical training, unfavorable responses below (above) a distinct threshold. In addition, “above” and “below” need to be referenced relative to a specific outcome in the variable of interest. For instance, in a cognitive test, performance could be operationalized by “number of correct items” and “reaction time” (variables of interest). Regarding number of correct items, it is favorable to achieve a higher number of correct items (responder: above; non-responder: below). Regarding reaction time, on the other hand, it is favorable to react faster (responder: below; non-responder: above). Regardless of the ongoing discussion about how to classify the level of responsiveness, there is some evidence that the interindividual heterogeneity in response to acute physical exercise and/or physical training might contribute to the interindividual heterogeneity observed in neurocognitive outcomes. This evidence is outlined in the following section.

Overview about the definitions of terms relevant to interindividual heterogeneity and exercise–cognition research ∗ Please note that “above” and “below” are relative to the favorable outcome in the variable of interest.

Definition of terms relevant to interindividual heterogeneity and exercise–cognition research
Physical activity “Physical activity” is any muscle-induced bodily movement that increases energy expenditure above ∼1.0/1.5 MET (metabolic equivalent of task; 1 MET = 1 kcal (4,184 kJ) × kg–1 × h–1) (Caspersen et al., 1985; Ainsworth et al., 2000; Budde et al., 2016).
Physical exercise “Physical exercises” are specific, planned, and structured forms of physical activities (Caspersen et al., 1985; Howley, 2001; Budde et al., 2016) and should be distinguished on temporal characteristics into (i) acute physical exercise (single bout) and chronic physical exercises (repeated bouts of acute exercises) (Scheuer and Tipton, 1977; Budde et al., 2016).
Physical training “Physical training” is chronic physical exercises when they are conducted regularly in a planned, structured, and purposive manner with the objective to increase (or maintain) individual capabilities in one or multiple fitness dimensions (Scheuer and Tipton, 1977; Caspersen et al., 1985; Howley, 2001; Budde et al., 2016; Herold et al., 2018a).
External load “External load” along with influencing factors (e.g., climatic conditions, equipment, ground condition) is defined as the work completed by the individual independent of internal characteristics (Wallace et al., 2009; Halson, 2014; Bourdon et al., 2017; Burgess, 2017; Vanrenterghem et al., 2017; McLaren et al., 2018; Impellizzeri et al., 2019).
Internal load “Internal load” is defined as individual and acute biomechanical, physiological, and/or psychological response(s) to the influencing factors (e.g., climatic conditions, equipment, ground condition) and the work performed (external load) (Wallace et al., 2009; Halson, 2014; Bourdon et al., 2017; Burgess, 2017; Vanrenterghem et al., 2017; McLaren et al., 2018; Impellizzeri et al., 2019).
Dose “Dose” is commonly defined as a product of exercise variables (e.g., exercise intensity, exercise duration, type of exercise), training variables (e.g., frequency of training sessions), and the application of training principles (Wasfy and Baggish, 2016; Northey et al., 2017; Solomon, 2018; Cabral et al., 2019; Erickson et al., 2019; Etnier et al., 2019; Falck et al., 2019; Ross et al., 2019; Williams et al., 2019) and should be operationalized by using a specific marker(s) of internal load. The specific marker(s) should be involved in biological processes driving the desired changes (e.g., lactate → brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) → neurocognitive changes).
Responder “Responders” are individuals who exhibit, at a certain time point, changes in a variable of interest that are above (below∗) a distinct threshold.
Non-responder “Non-responders” (or “individuals which did not respond”) are individuals who exhibit, at a certain time point, changes in a variable of interest that are below (above∗) a distinct threshold.
For instance, in a cognitive test performance, variables of interest could be operationalized by “number of correct items” and “reaction time.” In “number of correct items,” it is favorable to achieve a higher number of correct items. Hence, “responders” are individuals who exhibit at a certain time point changes in a variable of interest that are above a distinct threshold, and “non-responders” are individuals who exhibit, at a certain time point, changes in a variable of interest that are below a distinct threshold. In contrast, regarding reaction time, it is favorable to react faster. Hence, “responders” in this context are individuals who exhibit, at a certain time point, changes in a variable of interest that are below a distinct threshold, and “non-responders” are individuals who exhibit at a certain time point changes in a variable of interest that are above a distinct threshold. Responsiveness State, Functional and Structural Brain Changes, and Cognition

In the following, we will refer to acute endurance exercises and endurance training because (i) from a neuroevolutionary view, endurance capacities (e.g., running during foraging) are important to ensure physical and/or neurocognitive well-functioning (Mattson, 2012; Raichlen and Alexander, 2017), (ii) acute endurance exercises and/or endurance training are currently in the focus of exercise–cognition research (Hillman et al., 2008; Stimpson et al., 2018), (iii) endurance training induces substantial structural brain changes (Erickson et al., 2011; Stern et al., 2019), and (iv) endurance training entails greater benefits in cognitive performance than resistance training (Barha et al., 2017a).

Acute Physical Exercises

With regard to acute physical exercises, it was observed that individual baseline working memory function was linked with changes in working memory performance following acute very-light-to-moderate-intensity endurance exercises (Yamazaki et al., 2018). Furthermore, responders, who showed improved cognitive performance after a single bout of very-light-to-moderate-intensity endurance exercise, exhibited a higher level of prefrontal activation during exercising (Yamazaki et al., 2017). This finding suggests that not only peripheral systems are affected by the individual responsiveness state but also the central nervous system itself.

 Physical Training

Changes in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) measures in response to a 20 weeks endurance training program tended to vary tremendously among individuals (Bouchard et al., 1999). Exemplarily, Karavirta et al. (2011) observed, after a 21 weeks long combined exercise intervention in older adults, changes in CRF levels [assessed via maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max.)] ranging from -8 to 42%. Such interindividual differences in response to endurance training also affect the expression of neurotrophic factors [e.g., brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)] (Heisz et al., 2017), which play an important role in neuroplasticity (Erickson et al., 2010, 2011; Brigadski and Leßmann, 2014) and cognition (Erickson et al., 2010; Brigadski and Leßmann, 2014; Leckie et al., 2014). For instance, after 6 weeks of high-intensity endurance training, responders who improved their CRF [assessed via peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak)] to a greater extent than non-responders exhibited a significantly higher increase in serum BDNF (Heisz et al., 2017). This finding suggests that the state of responsiveness influences important mechanisms involved in neuroplasticity and cognition. Notably, a higher level of CRF level [mostly operationalized by VO2 max. (highest value attainable by a subject) or VO2 peak (highest, “system-limited” value attained during the CRF test) (Day et al., 2003)] is associated with (i) better cognitive performance in younger adults (Suwabe et al., 2017; Wengaard et al., 2017; Fortune et al., 2019), older adults (Erickson et al., 2011; Bugg et al., 2012; Verstynen et al., 2012; Albinet et al., 2014; Freudenberger et al., 2016; Hayes et al., 2016; Bherer et al., 2019; Castalanelli et al., 2019; Pentikäinen et al., 2019), and older adults with mild cognitive impairments (Sobol et al., 2018); (ii) favorable functional brain changes in younger adults (Stillman et al., 2018) and older adults (Colcombe et al., 2004; Albinet et al., 2014; Dupuy et al., 2015; Hyodo et al., 2016); and (iii) favorable structural brain changes in older adults (Colcombe et al., 2003; Erickson et al., 2009; Szabo et al., 2011; Bugg et al., 2012) and individuals with Alzheimer’s disease (Burns et al., 2008; Honea et al., 2009; Vidoni et al., 2012). Furthermore, in response to endurance training, increases in VO2 max. (iv) mediate the improvement in cognitive functions in younger adults (Stern et al., 2019) and (v) are associated with increases in hippocampal volumes in older adults (Erickson et al., 2011).

In sum, based on these associations between measures of CRF, measures of brain function and structure, and cognitive performance measures (albeit these correlations are not strictly causal in nature), it seems plausible to hypothesize that the large interindividual heterogeneity in measures of CRF may also contribute, among other factors, to the interindividual heterogeneity in measures of neurocognition in response to endurance training. However, to clarify the validity of these assumptions, further research is required.

 Master (of) the Fate? – How Genetics and Lifestyle Contribute to Interindividual Heterogeneity

The interindividual responsiveness to physical exercises and/or physical training and, in turn, the interindividual heterogeneity in outcomes are caused by several moderators, including both non-modifiable factors (e.g., sex or genotypes) and modifiable factors (e.g., nutrition, social or cognitive activities, exercise prescription) (Spiering et al., 2008; Bamman et al., 2014; Mann et al., 2014; Erickson et al., 2015; Sparks, 2017; Pickering and Kiely, 2018b). Notably, these factors can also be classified as endogenous factors (factors attributable to the individual such as sex or genotypes) and exogenous factors (factors attributable to external inputs, e.g., generated by exercise prescription) (Sparks, 2017). Currently, the roles of non-modifiable (endogenous) factors such as sex (Barha et al., 2017a, b, 2019; Barha and Liu-Ambrose, 2018; Cobbold, 2018; Loprinzi and Frith, 2018; Dao et al., 2019) and genotypes (Booth and Laye, 2010; Timmons et al., 2010; Timmons, 2011; Bouchard, 2012, 2019; Mann et al., 2014; Bouchard et al., 2015; Jones et al., 2016; Pickering and Kiely, 2017a,b,c, 2018a; Del Coso et al., 2018) are investigated most. Among these factors, it has been shown that a considerable amount (approximately up to half of the variance) of the interindividual heterogeneity in physical outcomes (Bouchard and Rankinen, 2001; Timmons et al., 2010; Davidsen et al., 2011; Timmons, 2011; Bouchard, 2012; Wilson et al., 2019), cognitive outcomes (McClearn, 1997; Goldberg and Weinberger, 2004; Blokland et al., 2008; Erickson et al., 2008; Friedman et al., 2008; Canivet et al., 2015, 2017), and brain structure outcomes (Thompson et al., 2001; Toga and Thompson, 2005; Bueller et al., 2006) are explained by genetics. However, considering current evidence, lifestyle factors may equalize a “genetic handicap” since people with a high CRF level but “unfavorable” genetic polymorphisms do not need to perform significantly poorer than individuals with low CRF level but “favorable” genetic equipment (Brown et al., 2019). These findings suggest that a genetic handicap can be counteracted by other factors (Flück, 2018) and that “overemphasizing” genetics for the individualization of exercise prescriptions is counter-productive (Carlsten and Burke, 2006; Kohane, 2009; Horwitz et al., 2013; Joyner and Lundby, 2018; Peck, 2018; Joyner, 2019). However, analysis of the genetics of participants is undoubtedly helpful in supporting individualization of acute physical exercise and/or physical training by aiding, for instance, the identification of potential responders and non-responders (Lightfoot, 2008; Pescatello, 2008; Booth and Laye, 2010; Timmons et al., 2010; Timmons, 2011; Pickering and Kiely, 2019a, b). Remarkably, it has also been highlighted that no “global non-responders” exist (Ross et al., 2015; Bonafiglia et al., 2016; Montero and Lundby, 2017; Pickering and Kiely, 2017c, 2018b; Toigo, 2019). Moreover, it is assumed that non-responsiveness can best be counteracted by modifying the dose of the physical exercise and/or physical training (Churchward-Venne et al., 2015; Ross et al., 2015; Montero and Lundby, 2017; Toigo, 2019). The latter suggests that the dose of physical interventions per se contributes significantly to the observed interindividual heterogeneity in (neurocognitive) outcomes.

 What Dose (It) Means?

The terminus dose is differently defined in the literature (Voils et al., 2012), but in exercise(-cognition) research, “dose” is commonly referred to as the product of exercise variables (e.g., exercise intensity, exercise duration, type of exercise; see Table 2) when considering an acute bout of physical exercises (Wasfy and Baggish, 2016; Pontifex et al., 2018). In training studies, dose can be seen as the product of exercise variables (e.g., exercise intensity, exercise duration, type of exercise), training variables (e.g., frequency of training sessions), and the application of training principles (Wasfy and Baggish, 2016; Northey et al., 2017; Solomon, 2018; Cabral et al., 2019; Erickson et al., 2019; Etnier et al., 2019; Falck et al., 2019; Ross et al., 2019; Williams et al., 2019). In reverse, dose could be modified in acute physical exercise studies by adjusting the exercise variables, while in physical training studies, exercise variables, training variables, and training principles must be taken into account (see Table 2). Such a purposeful modification is referred to as the adjustment of the exercise prescription.

Overview of general exercise variables, training variables, and training principles.

General exercise variables relevant in a single session
Exercise intensity The exercise intensity describes how strenuous the exercise is.
Exercise duration Time period that is spent for a specific exercise or the entire exercise session.
Type of exercise Type(s) of exercise(s) that is (are) used in the exercise session (e.g., cycling, dancing).
General training variables relevant in a training program
Frequency The number of training sessions across a distinct time interval.
Density Distribution of training sessions across a distinct time interval with regard to recovery time in-between training sessions.
Duration Duration over which a training program is carried out.
General training principles relevant in a training program
Variation To prolong adaptations over a distinct training duration, systematic manipulation (variation) of exercise variables and training variables is necessary.
Specificity To elicit a desired adaptation, the stimuli provided by the used physical exercises must be tailored to the desired adaptations (s).
Overload To improve a distinct type of fitness, an appropriate stimulus must be provided that exceeds the already-existing individual capacities to a distinct extent.
Progression To ensure continuous improvements, the stimulus must be appropriately modified over time (e.g., increase in external load).
Reversibility Once the physical intervention induced stimulus is removed (e.g., stop the training), de-adaptational process will occur, and the changes in fitness level will eventually return to the baseline level.
Periodization and programming In this context, periodization and programming are crucial elements for an appropriate exercise prescription. Periodization is the temporal coordination of training periods with specific fitness characteristics (e.g., strength or endurance) and application of training principles, which is referred to as macromanagement. Programming describes the organization of exercise variables and training variables (micromanagement). Periodization includes various forms such as linear periodization (LP) or non-linear periodization (NLP). In LP, typically, a gradual increase in intensity is conducted, whereas in NLP, exercise prescription is changed on weekly or daily basis.
The definitions are based on Stone et al. (2002), Ratamess et al. (2009), Campbell et al. (2012), Winters-Stone et al. (2014) and Törpel et al. (2018).

In the context of exercise prescription, it is also imperative to clarify the terms “external load” and “internal load.” While external load along with influencing factors (e.g., climatic conditions, equipment, ground condition) is defined as the work completed by the individual independent of internal characteristics (Wallace et al., 2009; Halson, 2014; Bourdon et al., 2017; Burgess, 2017; Vanrenterghem et al., 2017; McLaren et al., 2018; Impellizzeri et al., 2019), internal load is defined as individual and acute biomechanical, physiological, and/or psychological response(s) to the influencing factors and the work performed (Wallace et al., 2009; Halson, 2014; Bourdon et al., 2017; Burgess, 2017; Vanrenterghem et al., 2017; McLaren et al., 2018; Impellizzeri et al., 2019). According to the definition of internal load, which states that internal load is characterized by the individual and acute psychophysiological response(s) to the external load, it appears that internal load can be adjusted by modifying the external load. However, given that exercise variables such as exercise intensity can be operationalized using parameters of either external load (e.g., running with a speed of 10 km/h) or internal load (e.g., running with 60 of maximal heart rate), current definitions of dose are rather broad. Since dose is an essential factor for triggering neurobiological processes (e.g., release of neurotrophins such as BDNF; Dinoff et al., 2017), which in turn lead to neuroplastic and cognitive changes (Cotman et al., 2007; Voss et al., 2011, 2013a; Lucas et al., 2015; Zimmer et al., 2015; Basso and Suzuki, 2017; Stimpson et al., 2018), it is crucial to agree on an appropriate concept of dose. Although markers of internal load could be more difficult to measure (compared to markers of external load), we suggest that dose should be operationalized by using a specific marker or specific markers of internal load as a proxy. The two reasons for this assumption are outlined in the following.

Why Internal Load Should Be Used as a Proxy for Dose

Given (i) that internal load equals, per definition, the individual and acute psychophysiological response(s) to a given external load (Wallace et al., 2009; Halson, 2014; Bourdon et al., 2017; Burgess, 2017; Vanrenterghem et al., 2017; McLaren et al., 2018; Impellizzeri et al., 2019) and (ii) that neurocognitive changes are triggered by such distinct psychophysiological responses (Cotman et al., 2007; Zimmer et al., 2015; Basso and Suzuki, 2017; Stimpson et al., 2018), it seems reasonable to assume that internal load is a better proxy for dose than external load.

 Why a Specific Marker of Internal Load Is Needed as a Proxy for Dose

There are several markers of internal load that can be used to prescribe the exercise intensity in acute endurance exercises and/or endurance training [e.g., oxygen uptake, heart rate, or heart rate variability (HRV)]. For instance, HRV, i.e., the beat-to-beat variation over a distinct time period, under rest conditions or while exercising is an interesting marker of internal load because the internal load quantification by HRV indices is progressive and takes the individual fitness level as well as daily readiness and actual health state into account (Thayer et al., 2012; Plews et al., 2013; Vesterinen et al., 2013, 2016; Gronwald et al., 2016, 2018a, 2019b,c). Furthermore, resting-state HRV is associated with cognitive performance (Hansen et al., 2003; Frewen et al., 2013; Gillie et al., 2014; Zeki Al Hazzouri et al., 2014; Colzato et al., 2018).

However, currently, several hypotheses exist in literature that explain the positive effects of acute physical exercises and physical training on brain plasticity and cognition (Kramer et al., 1999; Smiley-Oyen et al., 2008; Davenport et al., 2012; McMorris and Hale, 2015; McMorris, 2016a, b,c,d; McMorris et al., 2016; Voss, 2016; Raichlen and Alexander, 2017; Pontifex et al., 2018; Stimpson et al., 2018; Audiffren and André, 2019). Among them, one of the most popular hypotheses is the “neurotrophic hypothesis,” which posits that in response to physical exercises, the organism releases several neurochemicals (e.g., neurotrophic factors such as BDNF), which in turn trigger neuroplasticity and facilitate cognitive enhancement (Voss et al., 2013b; Basso and Suzuki, 2017; Stimpson et al., 2018; Audiffren and André, 2019). Hence, it seems more promising to use a marker or markers of internal load that are related to changes in neurotrophic molecules in order to individualize and adjust exercise prescription (Pedersen, 2019). In this regard, the peripheral level of blood lactate could be a promising marker of internal load because peripheral blood lactate (e.g., from muscles) can cross the blood–brain barrier and provides energy to the brain (Kemppainen et al., 2005; Quistorff et al., 2008; van Hall et al., 2009; Dennis et al., 2015; Proia et al., 2016; Taher et al., 2016; Riske et al., 2017; Brooks, 2018; Sobral-Monteiro-Junior et al., 2019). Hence, it is not surprising that relative changes in peripheral levels of blood lactate are correlated significantly with cognitive performance levels after high-intensity interval endurance exercises (Lee et al., 2014; Tsukamoto et al., 2016; Hashimoto et al., 2017). The crucial role of blood lactate for neuroplasticity is further emphasized by findings of peripheral blood lactate levels being associated with the peripheral serum BDNF levels (Ferris et al., 2007; Schiffer et al., 2011). However, the exact molecular mechanisms of increased BDNF production in response to physical exercising are not fully understood (for review, see Jiménez-Maldonado et al., 2018). BDNF in the brain is involved in neuroplasticity (Brigadski and Leßmann, 2014), and serum levels of BDNF have been shown to be directly linked to cognitive performance after an acute bout of high-intensity endurance exercises (Hwang et al., 2016). Moreover, (i) serum BDNF mediates improvements in cognitive functions following a 1-year aerobic endurance training (Leckie et al., 2014), (ii) greater serum BDNF concentration changes in response to a 1-year-long aerobic endurance training are linked to hippocampal volume changes (Erickson et al., 2011), and (iii) reduced levels of serum BDNF are related to a decline in hippocampal volume and poorer memory performance (Erickson et al., 2010). In sum, a specific marker or specific markers of internal load such as the peripheral blood lactate level seems to constitute a promising proxy for dose. However, the optimal marker(s) that is (are), with regard to neuroplasticity and cognition, the most suitable proxy for the dose of physical exercise and/or physical training has yet to be discovered.

 Become Personal – How to Individualize the Exercise Prescription?

Based on the large interindividual heterogeneity (i) in psychophysiological responses to acute physical exercises and (ii) in long-term adaptions to a physical training, it is assumed that tailoring of these to the characteristics and needs of a particular person is well suited to maximize their efficiency (Buford and Pahor, 2012; Buford et al., 2013; Müller et al., 2017, 2018; Cobbold, 2018; Pickering and Kiely, 2018b). Such an individualization of acute physical exercises and/or physical training could be achieved by adjusting the exercise prescription (e.g., exercise intensity) (Lightfoot, 2008), which influences, in turn, the dose (objectified by a specific marker or specific markers of internal load; see previous section and Figure 1A). In order to illustrate our thoughts in practical terms, we focus on exercise intensity because a full discussion of all exercise variables, training variables, and training principles is beyond the scope of this article. As outlined in the previous section, using markers of internal load to prescribe exercise intensity is preferable instead of using parameters of external load such as speed in running specific exercises. Therefore, traditional markers of internal load such as the fixed percentage of the maximally achievable value of oxygen uptake or heart rate are often used (Garber et al., 2011; Suwabe et al., 2018). Using a fixed percentage of a maximally achievable value of oxygen uptake or heart rate involves a considerable amount of interindividual heterogeneity in other markers of internal load (e.g., metabolic responses objectified by, for instance, peripheral blood lactate) (Weltman et al., 1989, 1990; Meyer et al., 1999; Vollaard et al., 2009; Scharhag-Rosenberger et al., 2010). Metabolic responses (e.g., peripheral blood lactate level) constitute specific markers of internal load that are likely to be proxies for the dose that triggers neuroplastic processes and cognitive changes (see “Why a specific marker of internal load is needed as a proxy for dose”). Hence, traditional exercise prescriptions lead to largely varying individual doses as revealed by the marker(s) of internal load. This may lead, among other factors, to the observed interindividual heterogeneity in neurocognitive outcomes (see Figure 1B). Consequently, approaches that ensure that a comparable dose is provided to each individual (e.g., adapted exercise prescriptions that ensure a comparable level of peripheral blood lactate) may lower the interindividual heterogeneity regarding neurocognitive outcomes. Hence, such approaches are favorable in exercise–cognition research (see Figure 1). In this context, individual threshold concepts (aerobic and anaerobic threshold) that are based on individual metabolic (or respiratory) responses could be used to determine an individual’s initial exercise intensity (Meyer et al., 1999; Hofmann and Tschakert, 2010; Scharhag-Rosenberger et al., 2010; Weatherwax et al., 2016). However, while there is a strong theoretical basis for the application of a threshold-based exercise prescription for endurance exercises and endurance training, the challenges and pitfalls of determining such individual thresholds may explain why many researchers continue to favor exercise intensity prescriptions based on relative percentages of maximum values (Hofmann and Tschakert, 2010; Mann et al., 2013). Although our assumptions are well grounded on possible neurobiological mechanisms, they are mostly theoretical in nature, and thus, further research comparing, for instance, traditional versus adapted exercise prescriptions with regard to neuroplasticity and cognition is urgently needed.

(A) Schematic illustration of the possible influence of exercise prescription on dose, and individual responsiveness (responder and non-responder) with the assumed extent of improvements (high improvements in neurocognitive outcomes and low improvements in neurocognitive outcomes). The dotted red lines show that by using an appropriate exercise prescription, non-responders could be turned into responders. In part (B) of the figure, the difference between “traditional exercise prescription” and “adapted exercise prescription” regarding the load, the dose, the individual response(s), and the corresponding heterogeneity in outcomes is illustrated. “∗” with regard to subsequent neurobiological processes. In part (C) of the figure, the multiple levels on which physical activity (including physical exercise and physical training) could affect cognitive performance are shown (Stillman et al., 2016). “#” indicates that the brain could be seen as outcome, mediator, or predictor (Stillman and Erickson, 2018). “a” indicates that there are several possibilities in which way structural and functional brain changes, socioemotional changes and cognitive changes are intertwined (Stillman et al., 2016).

 Progress Is Not Without Limitations

Since the level and detail of description required to extensively describe and discuss the influence of all exercise variables, training variables, training principles, and factors influencing exercise–cognition interaction go far beyond the scope and intent of this article, our assumptions still remain imperfect because other exercise-related factors such as movement frequency (e.g., cycling cadence) (Ludyga et al., 2015, 2016) or psychological factors such as affective response (e.g., enjoyment or expectations) (Davidson et al., 2000; Davidson and McEwen, 2012; Burnet et al., 2018; Lindheimer et al., 2019) have not been considered. Nevertheless, given (i) that our knowledge of the dose–response relationship between acute physical exercises and/or physical training, neurobiological processes (e.g., neuroplasticity), and cognitive changes is still limited (Etnier et al., 2006, 2019; Hillman et al., 2008; Chang et al., 2012a, b; Barha et al., 2017b; Ströhlein et al., 2017; Tait et al., 2017; Pontifex et al., 2018; Stimpson et al., 2018; Erickson et al., 2019; Falck et al., 2019; Sanders et al., 2019), (ii) that peripheral blood lactate levels constitute an established marker of internal load (Hofmann and Tschakert, 2010; Beneke et al., 2011; Soligard et al., 2016; Impellizzeri et al., 2019), and (iii) that peripheral blood lactate levels are easily quantifiable by portable devices, the use of peripheral blood lactate as a proxy for dose seems a reasonable starting point. Nevertheless, lactate monitoring suffers from the drawbacks that (i) it necessitates blood sampling, which could be impractical in daily practice, and (ii) it requires a graded exercise test to calculate an individual threshold to prescribe the exercise intensity. Regarding the first objection, new methods to non-invasively determine critical physiological thresholds (e.g., lactate threshold) by means of muscle near-infrared spectroscopy (Wang et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2011; Bellotti et al., 2013; Borges and Driller, 2016; Driller et al., 2016) may constitute a more appropriate approach in daily practice, but this has yet to be investigated. With regard to the second objection, it is worth mentioning that graded exercise tests are relatively complex and time consuming and that exercise intensity could be more easily determined by using specific formulas (e.g., Karvonen formula to determine a target heart rate) (Karvonen and Vuorimaa, 1988; Tanaka et al., 2001; Gellish et al., 2007; Zhu et al., 2010; Nes et al., 2013; Shargal et al., 2015). However, a graded exercise test should be an integral part of the process of a proper exercise prescription because, currently, exercise intensity cannot be accurately predicted by specific formulas (Strzelczyk et al., 2001; Robergs and Landwehr, 2002; Silva et al., 2007; Sarzynski et al., 2013; Correa Mesa et al., 2015; Esco et al., 2015; Arena et al., 2016), and a fixed percentage of a maximally achievable value of heart rate leads to a considerable amount of interindividual heterogeneity in metabolic responses (e.g., blood lactate) (Meyer et al., 1999), which is deemed to contribute, at least partly, to the interindividual heterogeneity in neurocognitive outcomes (see previous sections).

Still, even if peripheral blood lactate concentrations are associated with serum BDNF concentrations (Ferris et al., 2007; Schiffer et al., 2011), further studies will be required to investigate the dose–response relationship between exercise prescription and (serum) BDNF levels (Knaepen et al., 2010; Coelho et al., 2013; Huang et al., 2014). Since BDNF release is also influenced by several other non-modifiable (e.g., sex Trajkovska et al., 2007; Komulainen et al., 2010; Bus et al., 2011) or non-exercise-related modifiable factors (e.g., sleep or nutrition; Giese et al., 2013, 2014; Walsh et al., 2015; Schmitt et al., 2016) that are known to influence neuroplasticity in general (e.g., sleep, Meerlo et al., 2009; Raven et al., 2018; or nutrition, Greenwood and Parasuraman, 2010; Phillips, 2017; Poulose et al., 2017), these factors should be carefully monitored in further studies.

In addition, with regard to the optimal dose, it could be useful to gather markers of internal load that are directly related to the state of the central nervous system itself (e.g., brain activity during exercise) because differences in brain activity (e.g., measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy) (i) allow distinguishing between responders and non-responders (Yamazaki et al., 2017), (ii) are sensitive to changes of exercise variables (e.g., exercise intensity) (Rooks et al., 2010; Giles et al., 2014; Tempest et al., 2014; Santos-Concejero et al., 2015, 2017; Takehara et al., 2017), (iii) are sensitive to demands posed by the cognitive task (Herff et al., 2013; Fishburn et al., 2014; Causse et al., 2017; Khaksari et al., 2019) or the motor task (Carius et al., 2016), (iv) and are associated with performance improvements in motor(–cognitive) tasks (Ono et al., 2014, 2015; Herold et al., 2017; Seidel et al., 2017). Hence, markers of internal load assessing activation of the central nervous system may serve to quantify “complexity” (defined as neurocognitive demands posed by the exercise), which is an important variable with regard to neurocognitive changes in response to acute physical exercises and physical training, too (Netz, 2019). However, while measuring brain activation during exercise offers great potential to understand exercise–cognition interaction in general and interindividual variability in particular, future research in this area is strongly needed before measures of brain activity can be used to guide exercise prescription.

Furthermore, we wish to stress that a traditional individualization of exercise prescription is perhaps necessary to answer basic research questions (e.g., Are the peripheral blood lactate release and changes in neurocognition a function of exercise intensity?) but that the individualization using an adapted exercise prescription may lead to further insights into exercise–cognition research (e.g., How to adapt exercise intensity to achieve a comparable change in the release of peripheral blood lactate across individuals and how this affects neurocognition?).

 Conclusion and Further Remarks

In essence, this article aimed at providing a suggestion for a clearer definition of the dose in exercise–cognition research and presenting evidence in how interindividual variability in the dose might contribute to the interindividual heterogeneity in neurocognitive outcomes. We propose that the dose of an acute bout of physical exercises and/or physical training should be operationalized by a specific marker (or specific markers) of internal load. Modifying the exercise prescription by carefully adjusting the external load, a comparable dose can be achieved across individuals (see Figures 1A,B). Research is strongly encouraged to investigate in the future whether an exercise prescription inducing a comparable dose may lower the interindividual heterogeneity considering outcome variables on different levels of analysis (Stillman et al., 2016) and on different aspects of the brain (Stillman and Erickson, 2018; see Figure 1C). Finally, understanding how a comparable dose affects neurocognitive outcomes is an important step toward identifying what dose is optimal for achieving the greatest benefits with regard to neurocognitive outcomes in an individual.

 Author Contributions

FH wrote and edited the manuscript. PM, TG, and NM reviewed and edited the drafted versions.

 Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

 References Abe K. (2012). Total daily physical activity and the risk of AD and cognitive decline in older adults. Neurology 79:1071; author reply 1071. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31826bd5cf 22946116 Ahtiainen J. P. Walker S. Peltonen H. Holviala J. Sillanpää E. Karavirta L. (2016). Heterogeneity in resistance training-induced muscle strength and mass responses in men and women of different ages. Age 38:10. 10.1007/s11357-015-9870-1 26767377 Aichberger M. C. Busch M. A. Reischies F. M. Ströhle A. Heinz A. Rapp M. A. (2010). Effect of Physical Inactivity on Cognitive Performance after 2.5 Years of Follow-Up. GeroPsych 23 7–15. 10.1024/1662-9647/a000003 Ainsworth B. E. Haskell W. L. Whitt M. C. Irwin M. L. Swartz A. M. Strath S. J. (2000). Compendium of physical activities. An update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 32 S498–S504. Albinet C. T. Mandrick K. Bernard P. L. Perrey S. Blain H. (2014). Improved cerebral oxygenation response and executive performance as a function of cardiorespiratory fitness in older women: a fNIRS study. Front. Aging Neurosci. 6:273185. 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00272 Arena R. Myers J. Kaminsky L. A. (2016). Revisiting age-predicted maximal heart rate. Can it be used as a valid measure of effort? Am. Heart J. 173 49–56. 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.12.006 26920596 Atkinson G. Batterham A. M. (2015). True and false interindividual differences in the physiological response to an intervention. Exp. Physiol. 100 577–588. 10.1113/EP085070 25823596 Atkinson G. Nevill A. M. (1998). Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med. 26 217–238. Atkinson G. Williamson P. Batterham A. M. (2019). Issues in the determination of “responders” and “non-responders” in physiological research. Exp. Physiol. 104 1215–1225. 10.1113/EP087712 31116468 Audiffren M. André N. (2019). The exercise-cognition relationship: a virtuous circle. J. Sport Health Sci. 8 339–347 10.1016/j.jshs.2019.03.001 31333886 Bagger M. Petersen P. H. Pedersen P. K. (2003). Biological variation in variables associated with exercise training. Int. J. Sports Med. 24 433–440. 10.1055/s-2003-41180 12905092 Bamman M. M. Cooper D. M. Booth F. W. Chin E. R. Neufer P. D. Trappe S. (2014). Exercise biology and medicine: innovative research to improve global health. Mayo Clin. Proc. 89 148–153. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.11.013 24485128 Barha C. K. Davis J. C. Falck R. S. Nagamatsu L. S. Liu-Ambrose T. (2017a). Sex differences in exercise efficacy to improve cognition. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in older humans. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 46 71–85. 10.1016/j.yfrne.2017.04.002 28442274 Barha C. K. Galea L. A. Nagamatsu L. S. Erickson K. I. Liu-Ambrose T. (2017b). Personalising exercise recommendations for brain health. Considerations and future directions. Br. J. Sports Med. 51 636–639. 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096710 27856411 Barha C. K. Liu-Ambrose T. (2018). Exercise and the aging brain: considerations for sex differences. BPL 3 1–11. 10.3233/BPL-1867 Barha C. K. Liu-Ambrose T. Best J. R. Yaffe K. Rosano C. (2019). Sex-dependent effect of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism on executive functioning and processing speed in older adults: evidence from the health ABC study. Neurobiol. Aging 74 161–170. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.10.021 30448615 Basso J. C. Suzuki W. A. (2017). The effects of acute exercise on mood, cognition, neurophysiology, and neurochemical pathways. a review. BPL 2 127–152. 10.3233/BPL-160040 29765853 Bellotti C. Calabria E. Capelli C. Pogliaghi S. (2013). Determination of maximal lactate steady state in healthy adults: can NIRS help? Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 45 1208–1216. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182828ab2 23274611 Beneke R. Leithäuser R. M. Ochental O. (2011). Blood lactate diagnostics in exercise testing and training. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 6 8–24. Bherer L. Erickson K. I. Liu-Ambrose T. (2013). A review of the effects of physical activity and exercise on cognitive and brain functions in older adults. J. Aging Res. 2013:657508. 10.1155/2013/657508 24102028 Bherer L. Langeard A. Kaushal N. Vrinceanu T. Desjardins-Crépeau L. Langlois F. (2019). Physical exercise training effect and mediation through cardiorespiratory fitness on dual-task performances differ in younger-old and older-old adults. J. Gerontol. Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 10.1093/geronb/gbz066 [Epub ahead of print]. 31121030 Blair S. N. (2009). Physical inactivity: the biggest public health problem of the 21st century. Br. J. Sports Med. 43 1–2. Blokland G. A. M. McMahon K. L. Hoffman J. Zhu G. Meredith M. Martin N. G. (2008). Quantifying the heritability of task-related brain activation and performance during the N-back working memory task: a twin fMRI study. Biol. Psychol. 79 70–79. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.03.006 18423837 Bonafiglia J. T. Brennan A. M. Ross R. Gurd B. J. (2019a). An appraisal of the SDIR as an estimate of true individual differences in training responsiveness in parallel-arm exercise randomized controlled trials. Physiol. Rep. 7:e14163. 10.14814/phy2.14163 31325240 Bonafiglia J. T. Ross R. Gurd B. J. (2019b). The application of repeated testing and monoexponential regressions to classify individual cardiorespiratory fitness responses to exercise training. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 119 889–900. 10.1007/s00421-019-04078-w 30666410 Bonafiglia J. T. Nelms M. W. Preobrazenski N. LeBlanc C. Robins L. Lu S. (2018). Moving beyond threshold-based dichotomous classification to improve the accuracy in classifying non-responders. Physiol. Rep. 6:e13928. 10.14814/phy2.13928 30488594 Bonafiglia J. T. Rotundo M. P. Whittall J. P. Scribbans T. D. Graham R. B. Gurd B. J. (2016). Inter-individual variability in the adaptive responses to endurance and sprint interval training: a randomized crossover study. PLoS One 11:e0167790. 10.1371/journal.pone.0167790 27936084 Booth F. W. Laye M. J. (2010). The future: genes, physical activity and health. Acta Physiol. 199 549–556. 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2010.02117.x 20345416 Borges N. R. Driller M. W. (2016). Wearable lactate threshold predicting device is valid and reliable in runners. J. Streng. Condit. Res. 30 2212–2218. 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001307 27457915 Bouchard C. (2012). Genomic predictors of trainability. Exp. Physiol. 97 347–352. 10.1113/expphysiol.2011.058735 Bouchard C. (2019). DNA sequence variations contribute to variability in fitness and trainability. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 51 1781–1785. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001976 31305368 Bouchard C. An P. Rice T. Skinner J. S. Wilmore J. H. Gagnon J. (1999). Familial aggregation of VO(2max) response to exercise training: results from the HERITAGE family study. J. Appl. Physiol. 87 1003–1008. 10.1152/jappl.1999.87.3.1003 10484570 Bouchard C. Antunes-Correa L. M. Ashley E. A. Franklin N. Hwang P. M. Mattsson C. M. (2015). Personalized preventive medicine: genetics and the response to regular exercise in preventive interventions. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 57 337–346. 10.1016/j.pcad.2014.08.005 25559061 Bouchard C. Blair S. N. Church T. S. Earnest C. P. Hagberg J. M. Häkkinen K. (2012). Adverse metabolic response to regular exercise: is it a rare or common occurrence? PLoS One 7:e37887. 10.1371/journal.pone.0037887 22666405 Bouchard C. Rankinen T. (2001). Individual differences in response to regular physical activity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 33 S446–S451. 10.1097/00005768-200106001-00013 11427769 Bourdon P. C. Cardinale M. Murray A. Gastin P. Kellmann M. Varley M. C. (2017). Monitoring athlete training loads. consensus statement. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 12 S2-161–S2-170. 10.1123/IJSPP.2017-0208 28463642 Bowen M. E. (2012). A prospective examination of the relationship between physical activity and dementia risk in later life. Am. J. Health Promot. 26 333–340. 10.4278/ajhp.110311-QUAN-115 22747314 Brigadski T. Leßmann V. (2014). BDNF. A regulator of learning and memory processes with clinical potential. eNeuroforum 5 1–11. 10.1007/s13295-014-0053-9 Brooks G. A. (2018). The Science and Translation of Lactate Shuttle Theory. Cell Metab. 27 757–785. 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.03.008 29617642 Brown B. M. Castalanelli N. Rainey-Smith S. R. Doecke J. Weinborn M. Sohrabi H. R. (2019). Influence of BDNF Val66Met on the relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness and memory in cognitively normal older adults. Behav. Brain Res. 362 103–108 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.01.013 30639507 Budde H. Schwarz R. Velasques B. Ribeiro P. Holzweg M. Machado S. (2016). The need for differentiating between exercise, physical activity, and training. Autoimmun. Rev. 15 110–111. 10.1016/j.autrev.2015.09.004 26384527 Bueller J. A. Aftab M. Sen S. Gomez-Hassan D. Burmeister M. Zubieta J.-K. (2006). BDNF Val66Met allele is associated with reduced hippocampal volume in healthy subjects. Biol. Psychiatry 59 812–815. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.09.022 16442082 Buford T. W. Pahor M. (2012). Making preventive medicine more personalized. Implications for exercise-related research. Preven. Med. 55 34–36. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.05.001 22588227 Buford T. W. Roberts M. D. Church T. S. (2013). Toward exercise as personalized medicine. Sports Med. 43 157–165. 10.1007/s40279-013-0018-0 23382011 Bugg J. M. Shah K. Villareal D. T. Head D. (2012). Cognitive and neural correlates of aerobic fitness in obese older adults. Exp. Aging Res. 38 131–145. 10.1080/0361073X.2012.659995 22404537 Burgess D. J. (2017). The Research Doesn’t Always Apply. practical solutions to evidence-based training-load monitoring in elite team sports. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 12 S2136–S2141. 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0608 27967277 Burley S. D. Drain J. R. Sampson J. A. Groeller H. (2018). Positive, limited and negative responders: the variability in physical fitness adaptation to basic military training. J. Sci. Med. Sport 21 1168–1172. 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.06.018 30057366 Burnet K. Kelsch E. Zieff G. Moore J. B. Stoner L. (2018). How fitting is F.I.T.T.? A perspective on a transition from the sole use of frequency, intensity, time, and type in exercise prescription. Physiol. Behav. 199 33–34. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.11.007 30414400 Burns J. M. Cronk B. B. Anderson H. S. Donnelly J. E. Thomas G. P. Harsha A. (2008). Cardiorespiratory fitness and brain atrophy in early Alzheimer disease. Neurology 71 210–216. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000317094.86209.cb 18625967 Bus B. A. A. Molendijk M. L. Penninx B. J. W. H. Buitelaar J. K. Kenis G. Prickaerts J. (2011). Determinants of serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Psychoneuroendocrinology 36 228–239. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.07.013 20702043 Cabral D. F. Rice J. Morris T. P. Rundek T. Pascual-Leone A. Gomes-Osman J. (2019). Exercise for Brain Health: An Investigation into the Underlying Mechanisms Guided by Dose. Neurotherapeutics 16 580–599. 10.1007/s13311-019-00749-w 31197642 Campbell K. L. Neil S. E. Winters-Stone K. M. (2012). Review of exercise studies in breast cancer survivors: attention to principles of exercise training. Br. J. Sports Med. 46 909–916. 10.1136/bjsports-2010-082719 23007178 Canivet A. Albinet C. T. André N. Pylouster J. Rodríguez-Ballesteros M. Kitzis A. (2015). Effects of BDNF polymorphism and physical activity on episodic memory in the elderly. A cross sectional study. Eur. Rev. Aging Phys. Act. 12:15. 10.1186/s11556-015-0159-2 26865879 Canivet A. Albinet C. T. Rodríguez-Ballesteros M. Chicherio C. Fagot D. André N. (2017). Interaction between BDNF Polymorphism and Physical Activity on Inhibitory Performance in the Elderly without Cognitive Impairment. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11:4217. 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00541 29163114 Carius D. Andrä C. Clauß M. Ragert P. Bunk M. Mehnert J. (2016). Hemodynamic Response Alteration As a Function of Task Complexity and Expertise—An fNIRS Study in Jugglers. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10:126. 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00126 27064925 Carlsten C. Burke W. (2006). Potential for genetics to promote public health: genetics research on smoking suggests caution about expectations. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 296 2480–2482. 10.1001/jama.296.20.2480 17119145 Caspersen C. J. Powell K. E. Christenson G. M. (1985). Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness. Definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Publ. Health Rep. 100 126–131. Castalanelli N. Weinborn M. Gignac G. E. Markovic S. Rainey-Smith S. R. Sohrabi H. R. (2019). Higher cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with better verbal generativity in community dwelling older adults. J. Aging Phys. Activ. 10.1123/japa.2018-0382 [Epub ahead of print]. 30747562 Causse M. Chua Z. Peysakhovich V. Del Campo N. Matton N. (2017). Mental workload and neural efficiency quantified in the prefrontal cortex using fNIRS. Sci. Rep. 7:5222. 10.1038/s41598-017-05378-x 28701789 Chang Y. K. Labban J. D. Gapin J. I. Etnier J. L. (2012a). The effects of acute exercise on cognitive performance: a meta-analysis. Brain Res. 1453 87–101. 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.068 22480735 Chang Y.-K. Pan C.-Y. Chen F.-T. Tsai C.-L. Huang C.-C. (2012b). Effect of resistance-exercise training on cognitive function in healthy older adults. A review. J. Aging Phys. Activ. 20 497–517. 10.1123/japa.20.4.497 Chmelo E. A. Crotts C. I. Newman J. C. Brinkley T. E. Lyles M. F. Leng X. (2015). Heterogeneity of physical function responses to exercise training in older adults. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 63 462–469. 10.1111/jgs.13322 25752778 Chrzanowski-Smith O. J. Piatrikova E. Betts J. A. Williams S. Gonzalez J. T. (2019). Variability in exercise physiology: can capturing intra-individual variation help better understand true inter-individual responses? Eur. J. Sport Sci. 10.1080/17461391.2019.1655100 [Epub ahead of print]. 31397212 Church T. S. Thomas D. M. Tudor-Locke C. Katzmarzyk P. T. Earnest C. P. Rodarte R. Q. (2011). Trends over 5 decades in U.S. occupation-related physical activity and their associations with obesity. PLoS One 6:e19657. 10.1371/journal.pone.0019657 21647427 Churchward-Venne T. A. Tieland M. Verdijk L. B. Leenders M. Dirks M. L. de Groot L. C. P. (2015). There are no nonresponders to resistance-type exercise training in older men and women. J. Am. Med. Direct. Assoc. 16 400–411. 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.01.071 25717010 Cobbold C. (2018). Battle of the sexes: which is better for you, high- or low-intensity exercise? J. Sport Health Sci. 7 429–432. 10.1016/j.jshs.2018.05.004 30450251 Coelho F. G. Gobbi S. Andreatto C. A. Corazza D. I. Pedroso R. V. Santos-Galduroz R. F. (2013). Physical exercise modulates peripheral levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF): a systematic review of experimental studies in the elderly. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 56 10–15. 10.1016/j.archger.2012.06.003 22749404 Coggan A. R. Costill D. L. (1984). Biological and technological variability of three anaerobic ergometer tests. Int. J. Sports Med. 5 142–145. 10.1055/s-2008-1025896 6746177 Colcombe S. J. Erickson K. I. Raz N. Webb A. G. Cohen N. J. McAuley E. (2003). Aerobic fitness reduces brain tissue loss in aging humans. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 58 176–180. Colcombe S. J. Erickson K. I. Scalf P. E. Kim J. S. Prakash R. McAuley E. (2006). Aerobic exercise training increases brain volume in aging humans. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 61 1166–1170. Colcombe S. J. Kramer A. F. Erickson K. I. Scalf P. McAuley E. Cohen N. J. (2004). Cardiovascular fitness, cortical plasticity, and aging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 3316–3321. 10.1073/pnas.0400266101 14978288 Colzato L. S. Jongkees B. J. Wit M. de, van der Molen M. J. W. Steenbergen L. (2018). Variable heart rate and a flexible mind. Higher resting-state heart rate variability predicts better task-switching. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 18 730–738. 10.3758/s13415-018-0600-x 29713957 Copeland J. L. Clarke J. Dogra S. (2015). Objectively measured and self-reported sedentary time in older Canadians. Prev. Med. Rep. 2 90–95. 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.01.003 26844055 Correa Mesa J. F. Cruz Martinez L. E. Correa Morales J. C. Rojas Valencia J. T. (2015). Maximum heart rate during exercise. reliability of the 220-age and Tanaka formulas in healthy young people at a moderate altitude. Rev. Fac. Med. 62 579–585. 10.15446/revfacmed.v62n4.44539 Cotman C. W. Berchtold N. C. Christie L.-A. (2007). Exercise builds brain health: key roles of growth factor cascades and inflammation. Trends Neurosci. 30 464–472. 10.1016/j.tins.2007.06.011 17765329 Dankel S. J. Loenneke J. P. (2019). A method to stop analyzing random error and start analyzing differential responders to exercise. Sports Med. 10.1007/s40279-019-01147-0 [Epub ahead of print]. 31254258 Dao E. Barha C. K. Best J. R. Hsiung G.-Y. Tam R. Liu-Ambrose T. (2019). The effect of aerobic exercise on white matter hyperintensity progression may vary by sex. Can. J. Aging 38 236–244. 10.1017/S0714980818000582 30867079 Davenport M. H. Hogan D. B. Eskes G. A. Longman R. S. Poulin M. J. (2012). Cerebrovascular reserve: the link between fitness and cognitive function? Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 40 153–158. 10.1097/JES.0b013e3182553430 22504726 Davidsen P. K. Gallagher I. J. Hartman J. W. Tarnopolsky M. A. Dela F. Helge J. W. (2011). High responders to resistance exercise training demonstrate differential regulation of skeletal muscle microRNA expression. J. Appl. Physiol. 110 309–317. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00901.2010 21030674 Davidson R. J. Jackson D. C. Kalin N. H. (2000). Emotion, plasticity, context, and regulation: perspectives from affective neuroscience. Psychol. Bull. 126 890–909. 10.1037//0033-2909.126.6.890 Davidson R. J. McEwen B. S. (2012). Social influences on neuroplasticity: stress and interventions to promote well-being. Nat. Neurosci. 15 689–695. 10.1038/nn.3093 22534579 Day J. R. Rossiter H. B. Coats E. M. Skasick A. Whipp B. J. (2003). The maximally attainable VO2 during exercise in humans. The peak vs. maximum issue. J. Appl. Physiol. 95 1901–1907. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00024.2003 12857763 de Bruijn R. F. Schrijvers E. M. C. de Groot K. A. Witteman J. C. M. Hofman A. Franco O. H. (2013). The association between physical activity and dementia in an elderly population: the rotterdam study. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 28 277–283. 10.1007/s10654-013-9773-3 23385659 Del Coso J. Hiam D. Houweling P. Pérez L. M. Eynon N. Lucía A. (2018). More than a ‘speed gene’: ACTN3 R577X genotype, trainability, muscle damage, and the risk for injuries. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 119 49–60. 10.1007/s00421-018-4010-0 30327870 Dennis A. Thomas A. G. Rawlings N. B. Near J. Nichols T. E. Clare S. (2015). An ultra-high field magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of post exercise lactate, glutamate and glutamine change in the human brain. Front. Physiol. 6:351. 10.3389/fphys.2015.00351 Dinoff A. Herrmann N. Swardfager W. Lanctôt K. L. (2017). The effect of acute exercise on blood concentrations of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in healthy adults. A meta-analysis. Eur. J. Neurosci. 46 1635–1646. 10.1111/ejn.13603 28493624 Driller M. Borges N. Plews D. (2016). Evaluating a new wearable lactate threshold sensor in recreational to highly trained cyclists. Sports Eng. 19 229–235. 10.1007/s12283-016-0198-6 Dupuy O. Gauthier C. J. Fraser S. A. Desjardins-Crepeau L. Desjardins M. Mekary S. (2015). Higher levels of cardiovascular fitness are associated with better executive function and prefrontal oxygenation in younger and older women. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9:66. 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00066 25741267 Erickson K. I. Gildengers A. G. Butters M. A. (2013). Physical activity and brain plasticity in late adulthood. Dialog. Clin. Neurosci. 15 99–108. Erickson K. I. Hillman C. Stillman C. M. Ballard R. M. Bloodgood B. Conroy D. E. (2019). Physical activity, cognition, and brain outcomes: a review of the 2018 physical activity guidelines. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 51 1242–1251. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001936 31095081 Erickson K. I. Hillman C. H. Kramer A. F. (2015). Physical activity, brain, and cognition. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 4 27–32. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.01.005 Erickson K. I. Kim J. S. Suever B. L. Voss M. W. Francis B. M. Kramer A. F. (2008). Genetic contributions to age-related decline in executive function: a 10-year longitudinal study of COMT and BDNF polymorphisms. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2:11. 10.3389/neuro.09.011.2008 18958211 Erickson K. I. Oberlin L. Gujral S. Leckie R. L. Weinstein A. M. Hodzic J. C. (2014). Exercise as a way of capitalizing on neuroplasticity in late adulthood. Top. Geriatr. Rehabil. 30 8–14. 10.1097/TGR.0000000000000008 Erickson K. I. Prakash R. S. Voss M. W. Chaddock L. Heo S. McLaren M. (2010). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor is associated with age-related decline in hippocampal volume. J. Neurosci. 30 5368–5375. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6251-09.2010 Erickson K. I. Prakash R. S. Voss M. W. Chaddock L. Hu L. Morris K. S. (2009). Aerobic fitness is associated with hippocampal volume in elderly humans. Hippocampus 19 1030–1039. 10.1002/hipo.20547 19123237 Erickson K. I. Voss M. W. Prakash R. S. Basak C. Szabo A. Chaddock L. (2011). Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108 3017–3022. 10.1073/pnas.1015950108 21282661 Esco M. R. Chamberlain N. Flatt A. A. Snarr R. L. Bishop P. A. Williford H. N. (2015). Cross-validation of age-predicted maximal heart rate equations among female collegiate athletes. J. Strength Cond. Res. 29 3053–3059. 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000978 25932986 Etnier J. L. Drollette E. S. Slutsky A. B. (2019). Physical activity and cognition: a narrative review of the evidence for older adults. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 42 156–166. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.12.006 Etnier J. L. Nowell P. M. Landers D. M. Sibley B. A. (2006). A meta-regression to examine the relationship between aerobic fitness and cognitive performance. Brain Res. Rev. 52 119–130. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.01.002 16490256 Falck R. S. Davis J. C. Best J. R. Crockett R. A. Liu-Ambrose T. (2019). Impact of exercise training on physical and cognitive function among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurobiol. Aging 79 119–130. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.03.007 31051329 Falck R. S. Davis J. C. Liu-Ambrose T. (2016). What is the association between sedentary behaviour and cognitive function? A systematic review. Br. J. Sports Med. 51 800–811. 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095551 27153869 Faude O. Hecksteden A. Hammes D. Schumacher F. Besenius E. Sperlich B. (2017). Reliability of time-to-exhaustion and selected psycho-physiological variables during constant-load cycling at the maximal lactate steady-state. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 42 142–147. 10.1139/apnm-2016-0375 28128633 Ferris L. T. Williams J. S. Shen C. -L. (2007). The effect of acute exercise on serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels and cognitive function. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 39 728–734. 10.1249/mss.0b013e31802f04c7 17414812 Fishburn F. A. Norr M. E. Medvedev A. V. Vaidya C. J. (2014). Sensitivity of fNIRS to cognitive state and load. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:76. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00076 24600374 Flück M. (2018). Optimierung der muskuloskelettalen rehabilitation durch einbezug individueller faktoren der zellulären plastizität. Dtsch Z Sportmed. 2018 283–284. 10.5960/dzsm.2018.345 Fortune J. M. Kelly Á. M. Robertson I. H. Hussey J. (2019). An investigation into the relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness, cognition and BDNF in young healthy males. Neurosci. Lett 704 126–132. 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.03.012 30862494 Freudenberger P. Petrovic K. Sen A. Töglhofer A. M. Fixa A. Hofer E. (2016). Fitness and cognition in the elderly. The Austrian stroke prevention study. Neurology 86 418–424. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002329 26740674 Frewen J. Finucane C. Savva G. M. Boyle G. Coen R. F. Kenny R. A. (2013). Cognitive function is associated with impaired heart rate variability in ageing adults: the Irish longitudinal study on ageing wave one results. Clin. Auton. Res. 23 313–323. 10.1007/s10286-013-0214-x 24077752 Friedman N. P. Miyake A. Young S. E. DeFries J. C. Corley R. P. Hewitt J. K. (2008). Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 137 201–225. 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.201 18473654 Gallen C. L. D’Esposito M. (2019). Brain modularity: a biomarker of intervention-related plasticity. Trends Cogn. Sci. 23 293–304. 10.1016/j.tics.2019.01.014 30827796 Garber C. E. Blissmer B. Deschenes M. R. Franklin B. A. Lamonte M. J. Lee I.-M. (2011). American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 43 1334–1359. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb 21694556 Gass G. C. McLellan T. M. Gass E. M. (1991). Effects of prolonged exercise at a similar percentage of maximal oxygen consumption in trained and untrained subjects. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 63 430–435. 10.1007/BF00868074 1765056 Gellish R. L. Goslin B. R. Olson R. E. McDonald A. Russi G. D. Moudgil V. K. (2007). Longitudinal modeling of the relationship between age and maximal heart rate. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 39 822–829. 10.1097/mss.0b013e31803349c6 17468581 Giese M. Unternaehrer E. Brand S. Calabrese P. Holsboer-Trachsler E. Eckert A. (2013). The interplay of stress and sleep impacts BDNF level. PLoS One 8:e76050. 10.1371/journal.pone.0076050 24146812 Giese M. Unternährer E. Hüttig H. Beck J. Brand S. Calabrese P. (2014). BDNF: an indicator of insomnia? Mol. Psychiatry 19 151–152. 10.1038/mp.2013.10 23399916 Giles G. E. Brunye T. T. Eddy M. D. Mahoney C. R. Gagnon S. A. Taylor H. A. (2014). Acute exercise increases oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin in the prefrontal cortex. NeuroReport 25 1320–1325. 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000266 25275640 Gillie B. L. Vasey M. W. Thayer J. F. (2014). Heart rate variability predicts control over memory retrieval. Psychol. Sci. 25 458–465. 10.1177/0956797613508789 24335601 Goldberg T. E. Weinberger D. R. (2004). Genes and the parsing of cognitive processes. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8 325–335. 10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.011 15242692 Grande G. Vanacore N. Maggiore L. Cucumo V. Ghiretti R. Galimberti D. (2014). Physical activity reduces the risk of dementia in mild cognitive impairment subjects. A cohort study. J. Alzheimers Dis. 39 833–839. 10.3233/JAD-131808 24296815 Greenham G. Buckley J. D. Garrett J. Eston R. Norton K. (2018). Biomarkers of physiological responses to periods of intensified, non-resistance-based exercise training in well-trained male athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 48 2517–2548. 10.1007/s40279-018-0969-2 30141022 Greenwood P. M. Parasuraman R. (2010). Neuronal and cognitive plasticity. A neurocognitive framework for ameliorating cognitive aging. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2:150. 10.3389/fnagi.2010.00150 Gronwald T. Alves A. C. D. B. Murillo-Rodríguez E. Latini A. Schuette J. Budde H. (2019a). Standardization of exercise intensity and consideration of a dose-response is essential. Commentary on “Exercise-linked FNDC5/irisin rescues synaptic plasticity and memory defects in Alzheimer’s models”, by Lourenco et al., published 2019 in nature medicine. J. Sport Health Sci. 8 353–354. 10.1016/j.jshs.2019.03.006 31333889 Gronwald T. Hoos O. Hottenrott K. (2019b). Effects of a short-term cycling interval session and active recovery on non-linear dynamics of cardiac autonomic activity in endurance trained cyclists. JCM 8:194. 10.3390/jcm8020194 30736284 Gronwald T. Hoos O. Hottenrott K. (2019c). Effects of acute normobaric hypoxia on non-linear dynamics of cardiac autonomic activity during constant workload cycling exercise. Front. Physiol. 10:865. 10.3389/fphys.2019.00999 Gronwald T. Hoos O. Ludyga S. Hottenrott K. (2018a). Non-linear dynamics of heart rate variability during incremental cycling exercise. Res. Sports Med. 59 1–11. 10.1080/15438627.2018.1502182 30040499 Gronwald T. Velasques B. Ribeiro P. Machado S. Murillo-Rodríguez E. Ludyga S. (2018b). Increasing exercise’s effect on mental health: exercise intensity does matter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115 E11890–E11891. 10.1073/pnas.1818161115 30568027 Gronwald T. Schulze S. Ludyga S. Hottenrott K. (2016). Evaluierung individueller Trainingsvorgaben auf Basis der Herzfrequenzvariabilität für ein Lauftraining im Freizeit- und Gesundheitssport. Praxis 105 1065–1070. 10.1024/1661-8157/a002458 27606913 Halson S. L. (2014). Monitoring training load to understand fatigue in athletes. Sports Med. 44(Suppl. 2), S139–S147. 10.1007/s40279-014-0253-z 25200666 Hamer M. Chida Y. (2009). Physical activity and risk of neurodegenerative disease: a systematic review of prospective evidence. Psychol. Med. 39 3–11. 10.1017/S0033291708003681 18570697 Hansen A. L. Johnsen B. H. Thayer J. F. (2003). Vagal influence on working memory and attention. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 48 263–274. 10.1016/S0167-8760(03)00073-4 Hashimoto T. Tsukamoto H. Takenaka S. Olesen N. D. Petersen L. G. Sørensen H. (2017). Maintained exercise-enhanced brain executive function related to cerebral lactate metabolism in men. FASEB J. 32 1417–1427. 10.1096/fj.201700381RR 29127193 Hayes S. M. Forman D. E. Verfaellie M. (2016). Cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with cognitive performance in older but not younger adults. J. Gerontol. Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 71 474–482. 10.1093/geronb/gbu167 25528256 Hecksteden A. Kraushaar J. Scharhag-Rosenberger F. Theisen D. Senn S. Meyer T. (2015). Individual response to exercise training - a statistical perspective. J. Appl. Physiol. 118 1450–1459. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00714.2014 25663672 Hecksteden A. Pitsch W. Rosenberger F. Meyer T. (2018). Repeated testing for the assessment of individual response to exercise training. J. Appl. Physiol. 124 1567–1579. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00896.2017 29357481 Heisz J. J. Clark I. B. Bonin K. Paolucci E. M. Michalski B. Becker S. (2017). The effects of physical exercise and cognitive training on memory and neurotrophic factors. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 29 1895–1907. 10.1162/jocn_a_01164 28699808 Herff C. Heger D. Fortmann O. Hennrich J. Putze F. Schultz T. (2013). Mental workload during n-back task-quantified in the prefrontal cortex using fNIRS. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:935. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00935 24474913 Herold F. Hamacher D. Schega L. Müller N. G. (2018a). Thinking while moving or moving while thinking – concepts of motor-cognitive training for cognitive performance enhancement. Front. Aging Neurosci. 10 1–11. 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00228 Herold F. Wiegel P. Scholkmann F. Müller N. G. (2018b). Applications of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fnirs) neuroimaging in exercise?cognition science: a systematic, methodology-focused review. J. Clin. Med. 7:466. 10.3390/jcm7120466 30469482 Herold F. Orlowski K. Börmel S. Müller N. G. (2017). Cortical activation during balancing on a balance board. Hum. Move. Sci. 51 51–58. 10.1016/j.humov.2016.11.002 27846398 Herold F. Törpel A. Schega L. Müller N. G. (2019). Functional and/or structural brain changes in response to resistance exercises and resistance training lead to cognitive improvements – a systematic review. Eur. Rev. Aging Phys. Act. 16:10. 10.1186/s11556-019-0217-2 31333805 Hillman C. H. Erickson K. I. Kramer A. F. (2008). Be smart, exercise your heart. Exercise effects on brain and cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9 58–65. 10.1038/nrn2298 18094706 Hofmann P. Tschakert G. (2010). Special needs to prescribe exercise intensity for scientific studies. Cardiol. Res. Pract. 2011:209302. 10.4061/2011/209302 21197479 Honea R. A. Thomas G. P. Harsha A. Anderson H. S. Donnelly J. E. Brooks W. M. (2009). Cardiorespiratory fitness and preserved medial temporal lobe volume in Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 23 188–197. 10.1097/WAD.0b013e31819cb8a2 19812458 Horwitz R. I. Cullen M. R. Abell J. Christian J. B. (2013). Medicine. (De)personalized medicine. Science 339 1155–1156. 10.1126/science.1234106 23471391 Hötting K. Röder B. (2013). Beneficial effects of physical exercise on neuroplasticity and cognition. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37 2243–2257. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.04.005 23623982 Howley E. T. (2001). Type of activity. Resistance, aerobic and leisure versus occupational physical activity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 33 S364–S369; discussion S419–S420. Huang T. Larsen K. T. Ried-Larsen M. Moller N. C. Andersen L. B. (2014). The effects of physical activity and exercise on brain-derived neurotrophic factor in healthy humans: a review. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 24 1–10. 10.1111/sms.12069 23600729 Hubal M. J. Gordish-Dressman H. Thompson P. D. Price T. B. Hoffman E. P. Angelopoulos T. J. (2005). Variability in muscle size and strength gain after unilateral resistance training. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 37 964–972. Hwang J. Brothers R. M. Castelli D. M. Glowacki E. M. Chen Y. T. Salinas M. M. (2016). Acute high-intensity exercise-induced cognitive enhancement and brain-derived neurotrophic factor in young, healthy adults. Neurosci. Lett. 630 247–253. 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.07.033 27450438 Hyodo K. Dan I. Kyutoku Y. Suwabe K. Byun K. Ochi G. (2016). The association between aerobic fitness and cognitive function in older men mediated by frontal lateralization. NeuroImage 125 291–300. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.062 26439424 Impellizzeri F. M. Marcora S. M. Coutts A. J. (2019). Internal and external training load: 15 years on. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 14 270–273. 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0935 30614348 Jiménez-Maldonado A. Rentería I. García-Suárez P. C. Moncada-Jiménez J. Freire-Royes L. F. (2018). The Impact of high-intensity interval training on brain derived neurotrophic factor in brain: a mini-review. Front. Neurosci. 12:839. 10.3389/fnins.2018.00839 Jones N. Kiely J. Suraci B. Collins D. de Lorenzo D. Pickering C. (2016). A genetic-based algorithm for personalized resistance-training. Biol. Sport 33 117–126. 10.5604/20831862.1198210 27274104 Joyner M. J. (2019). Limits to the evidence that dna sequence differences contribute to variability in fitness and trainability. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 51 1786–1789. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001977 31305369 Joyner M. J. Lundby C. (2018). Concepts about V⋅O2max and trainability are context dependent. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 46 138–143. 10.1249/JES.0000000000000150 29912036 Karavirta L. Häkkinen K. Kauhanen A. Arija-Blázquez A. Sillanpää E. Rinkinen N. (2011). Individual responses to combined endurance and strength training in older adults. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 43 484–490. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181f1bf0d 20689460 Karvonen J. Vuorimaa T. (1988). Heart rate and exercise intensity during sports activities. Pract. Appl. Sports Med. 5 303–311. 10.2165/00007256-198805050-00002 3387734 Katch V. Weltman A. Sady S. Freedson P. (1978). Validity of the relative percent concept for equating training intensity. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 39 219–227. 10.1007/BF00421445 710387 Katch V. L. Sady S. S. Freedson P. (1982). Biological variability in maximum aerobic power. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 14 21–25 Kemppainen J. Aalto S. Fujimoto T. Kalliokoski K. K. Långsjö J. Oikonen V. (2005). High intensity exercise decreases global brain glucose uptake in humans. J. Physiol. 568 323–332. 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.091355 Khaksari K. Condy E. Millerhagen J. B. Anderson A. A. Dashtestani H. Gandjbakhche A. H. (2019). Effects of Performance and task duration on mental workload during working memory task. Photonics 6 94. 10.3390/photonics6030094 Knaepen K. Goekint M. Heyman E. M. Meeusen R. (2010). Neuroplasticity - exercise-induced response of peripheral brain-derived neurotrophic factor: a systematic review of experimental studies in human subjects. Sports Med. 40 765–801. 10.2165/11534530-000000000-00000 20726622 Kohane I. S. (2009). The twin questions of personalized medicine: who are you and whom do you most resemble? Genome Med. 1:4. 10.1186/gm4 19348691 Komulainen P. Kivipelto M. Lakka T. A. Savonen K. Hassinen M. Kiviniemi V. (2010). Exercise, fitness and cognition – A randomised controlled trial in older individuals. The DR’s EXTRA study. Eur. Geriatr. Med. 1 266–272. 10.1016/j.eurger.2010.08.001 Kramer A. F. Hahn S. Cohen N. J. Banich M. T. McAuley E. Harrison C. R. (1999). Ageing, fitness and neurocognitive function. Nature 400 418–419. 10.1038/22682 10440369 Ku P. -W. Liu Y. -T. Lo M. -K. Chen L. -J. Stubbs B. (2017). Higher levels of objectively measured sedentary behavior is associated with worse cognitive ability. Two-year follow-up study in community-dwelling older adults. Exp. Gerontol. 99 110–114. 10.1016/j.exger.2017.09.014 28962854 Laurin D. Verreault R. Lindsay J. MacPherson K. Rockwood K. (2001). Physical activity and risk of cognitive impairment and dementia in elderly persons. Arch. Neurol. 58 498–504. 10.1001/archneur.58.3.498 11255456 Leckie R. L. Oberlin L. E. Voss M. W. Prakash R. S. Szabo-Reed A. Chaddock-Heyman L. (2014). BDNF mediates improvements in executive function following a 1-year exercise intervention. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:985. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00985 25566019 Lee J. K. Koh A. C. Koh S. X. Liu G. J. Nio A. Q. Fan P. W. (2014). Neck cooling and cognitive performance following exercise-induced hyperthermia. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 114 375–384. 10.1007/s00421-013-2774-9 24318656 Leifer E. S. Brawner C. A. Fleg J. L. Kraus W. E. Whellan D. J. Piña I. L. (2014). Are there negative responders to exercise training among heart failure patients? Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 46 219–224. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a44164 23860416 Lightfoot J. T. (2008). Commentary on viewpoint: Perspective on the future use of genomics in exercise prescription. J. Appl. Physiol. 104 1249. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00014.2008 18385304 Lindheimer J. B. Szabo A. Raglin J. S. Beedie C. (2019). Advancing the understanding of placebo effects in psychological outcomes of exercise: lessons learned and future directions. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 10.1080/17461391.2019.1632937 [Epub ahead of print]. 31215360 Liu-Ambrose T. Barha C. K. Best J. R. (2018). Physical activity for brain health in older adults. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 43 1105–1112. 10.1139/apnm-2018-0260 30306793 Loprinzi P. D. Frith E. (2018). The role of sex in memory function: considerations and recommendations in the context of exercise. J. Clin. Med. 7:132. 10.3390/jcm7060132 29857518 Lucas S. J. E. Cotter J. D. Brassard P. Bailey D. M. (2015). High-intensity interval exercise and cerebrovascular health: curiosity, cause, and consequence. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 35 902–911. 10.1038/jcbfm.2015.49 25833341 Ludyga S. Gronwald T. Hottenrott K. (2015). Effects of high vs. low cadence training on cyclists’ brain cortical activity during exercise. J. Sci. Med. Sport 19 342–7. 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.04.003 25912908 Ludyga S. Gronwald T. Hottenrott K. (2016). The athlete’s brain: cross-sectional evidence for neural efficiency during cycling exercise. Neural Plast. 2016:4583674. 10.1155/2016/4583674 26819767 Mann T. Lamberts R. P. Lambert M. I. (2013). Methods of prescribing relative exercise intensity. Physiol. Pract. Consider. Sports Med. 43 613–625. 10.1007/s40279-013-0045-x 23620244 Mann T. N. Lamberts R. P. Lambert M. I. (2014). High responders and low responders: factors associated with individual variation in response to standardized training. Sports Med. 44 1113–1124. 10.1007/s40279-014-0197-3 24807838 Mattson M. P. (2012). Evolutionary aspects of human exercise—born to run purposefully. Ageing Res. Rev. 11 347–352. 10.1016/j.arr.2012.01.007 22394472 McClearn G. E. (1997). Substantial genetic influence on cognitive abilities in twins 80 or more years old. Science 276 1560–1563. 10.1126/science.276.5318.1560 9171059 McLaren S. J. Macpherson T. W. Coutts A. J. Hurst C. Spears I. R. Weston M. (2018). The relationships between internal and external measures of training load and intensity in team sports. A Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 48 641–658. 10.1007/s40279-017-0830-z 29288436 McMorris T. Hale B. J. (2015). Is there an acute exercise-induced physiological/biochemical threshold which triggers increased speed of cognitive functioning? A meta-analytic investigation. J. Sport Health Sci. 4 4–13. 10.1016/j.jshs.2014.08.003 McMorris T. Turner A. Hale B. J. Sproule J. (2016). “Beyond the catecholamines hypothesis for an acute exercise–cognition interaction,” in Exercise-Cognition Interaction, ed T. McMorris (San Diego, CA:Elsevier), 65–103. McMorris T. (ed.) (2016a). “Chronic exercise and cognition in humans,” in Exercise-Cognition Interaction (New York, NY:Elsevier), 167–186. McMorris T. (2016b). Developing the catecholamines hypothesis for the acute exercise-cognition interaction in humans: lessons from animal studies. Physiol. Behav. 165 291–299. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.08.011 27526999 McMorris T. (ed.) (2016c). “Exercise–cognition interaction: state of the art and future research,” in Exercise-Cognition Interaction (New York, NY:Elsevier), 459–481. McMorris T. (ed.) (2016d). “History of research into the acute exercise–cognition interaction,” in Exercise-Cognition Interaction (New York, NY:Elsevier), 1–28. McSween M. -P. Coombes J. S. MacKay C. P. Rodriguez A. D. Erickson K. I. Copland D. A. (2018). The immediate effects of acute aerobic exercise on cognition in healthy older adults: a systematic review. Sports Med. 49 67–82. 10.1007/s40279-018-01039-9 30560422 Meerlo P. Mistlberger R. E. Jacobs B. L. Heller H. C. McGinty D. (2009). New neurons in the adult brain: the role of sleep and consequences of sleep loss. Sleep Med. Rev. 13 187–194. 10.1016/j.smrv.2008.07.004 18848476 Meyer T. Gabriel H. H. Kindermann W. (1999). Is determination of exercise intensities as percentages of VO2max or HRmax adequate? Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 31 1342–1345. Montero D. Lundby C. (2017). Refuting the myth of non-response to exercise training: ‘non-responders’ do respond to higher dose of training. J. Physiol. 595 3377–3387. 10.1113/JP273480 28133739 Moreau D. Chou E. (2019). The acute effect of high-intensity exercise on executive function: a meta-analysis. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 14 734–764. 10.1177/1745691619850568 31365839 Müller P. Rehfeld K. Schmicker M. Müller N. (2018). P52. Future directions for physical exercise as personalized medicine. Clin. Neurophysiol. 129:e88. 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.04.689 Müller P. Schmicker M. Müller N. G. (2017). Präventionsstrategien gegen Demenz [Preventive strategies for dementia]. Zeitschrift für Gerontol. Geriatr. 50(Suppl. 2), 89–95. 10.1007/s00391-017-1202-x 28243736 Nes B. M. Janszky I. Wisløff U. Støylen A. Karlsen T. (2013). Age-predicted maximal heart rate in healthy subjects. The HUNT fitness study. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 23 697–704. 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2012.01445.x 22376273 Netz Y. (2019). Is there a preferred mode of exercise for cognition enhancement in older age?—a narrative review. Front. Med. 6:1. 10.3389/fmed.2019.00057 30984760 Northey J. M. Cherbuin N. Pumpa K. L. Smee D. J. Rattray B. (2017). Exercise interventions for cognitive function in adults older than 50. A systematic review with meta-analysis. Br. J. Sports Med. 52 154–160. 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096587 28438770 Ono Y. Noah J. A. Zhang X. Nomoto Y. Suzuki T. Shimada S. (2015). Motor learning and modulation of prefrontal cortex. An fNIRS assessment. J. Neural Eng. 12:66004. 10.1088/1741-2560/12/6/066004 26401727 Ono Y. Nomoto Y. Tanaka S. Sato K. Shimada S. Tachibana A. (2014). Frontotemporal oxyhemoglobin dynamics predict performance accuracy of dance simulation gameplay: temporal characteristics of top-down and bottom-up cortical activities. NeuroImage 85(Pt 11), 461–470. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.071 23707582 Owen N. Sparling P. B. Healy G. N. Dunstan D. W. Matthews C. E. (2010). Sedentary behavior. Emerging evidence for a new health risk. Mayo Clin. Proc. 85 1138–1141. 10.4065/mcp.2010.0444 21123641 Paillard T. (2015). Preventive effects of regular physical exercise against cognitive decline and the risk of dementia with age advancement. Sports Med. Open 1:4. 10.1186/s40798-015-0016-x 26284161 Paillard-Borg S. Fratiglioni L. Winblad B. Wang H. -X. (2009). Leisure activities in late life in relation to dementia risk. Principal component analysis. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 28 136–144. 10.1159/000235576 19690416 Peck R. W. (2018). Precision medicine is not just genomics: the right dose for every patient. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 58 105–122. 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010617-052446 28961067 Pedersen B. K. (2019). Physical activity and muscle-brain crosstalk. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 15 383–392. 10.1038/s41574-019-0174-x 30837717 Pentikäinen H. Savonen K. Ngandu T. Solomon A. Komulainen P. Paajanen T. (2019). Cardiorespiratory fitness and cognition: longitudinal associations in the FINGER study. J. Alzheimers Dis. 68 961–968. 10.3233/JAD-180897 30814346 Pescatello L. S. (2008). Commentary on viewpoint: perspective on the future use of genomics in exercise prescription. J. Appl. Physiol. 104:1247. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01312.2007 18385302 Phillips C. (2017). Lifestyle modulators of neuroplasticity: how physical activity, mental engagement, and diet promote cognitive health during aging. Neural Plast. 2017:3589271. 10.1155/2017/3589271 28695017 Pickering C. Kiely J. (2017a). ACTN3: more than just a gene for speed. Front. Physiol. 8:1080. 10.3389/fphys.2017.01080 Pickering C. Kiely J. (2017b). Exercise genetics: seeking clarity from noise. BMJ Open Sport Exerc. Med. 3:e000309. 10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000309 29259816 Pickering C. Kiely J. (2017c). Understanding personalized training responses: can genetic assessment help? Open Sports Sci. J. 10 191–213. 10.2174/1875399X01710010191 Pickering C. Kiely J. (2018a). ACTN3, morbidity, and healthy aging. Front. Genet. 9:15. 10.3389/fgene.2018.00015 Pickering C. Kiely J. (2018b). Do non-responders to exercise exist—and if so, what should we do about them? Sports Med. 49 1–7. 10.1007/s40279-018-01041-1 30560423 Pickering C. Kiely J. (2019a). Exercise response efficiency: a novel way to enhance population health? Lifestyle Genom. 11 129–135. 10.1159/000501206 31302657 Pickering C. Kiely J. (2019b). The development of a personalised training framework: implementation of emerging technologies for performance. JFMK 4:25. 10.3390/jfmk4020025 Plews D. J. Laursen P. B. Stanley J. Kilding A. E. Buchheit M. (2013). Training adaptation and heart rate variability in elite endurance athletes: opening the door to effective monitoring. Sports Med. 43 773–781. 10.1007/s40279-013-0071-8 23852425 Pontifex M. B. McGowan A. L. Chandler M. C. Gwizdala K. L. Parks A. C. Fenn K. (2018). A primer on investigating the after effects of acute bouts of physical activity on cognition. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 40 1–22. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.08.015 Poulose S. M. Miller M. G. Scott T. Shukitt-Hale B. (2017). Nutritional factors affecting adult neurogenesis and cognitive function. Adv. Nutr. 8 804–811. 10.3945/an.117.016261 29141966 Proia P. Di Liegro C. M. Schiera G. Fricano A. Di Liegro I. (2016). Lactate as a metabolite and a regulator in the central nervous system. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17:1450. 10.3390/ijms17091450 27598136 Quistorff B. Secher N. H. van Lieshout J. J. (2008). Lactate fuels the human brain during exercise. FASEB J. 22 3443–3449. 10.1096/fj.08-106104 18653766 Raichlen D. A. Alexander G. E. (2017). Adaptive capacity: an evolutionary neuroscience model linking exercise, cognition, and brain health. Trends Neurosci. 40 408–421. 10.1016/j.tins.2017.05.001 28610948 Ratamess N. Alvar B. A. Evetoch T. K. Housh T. J. Kibler W. B. Kraemer W. J. (2009). American college of sports medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 41 687–708. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670 19204579 Ravaglia G. Forti P. Lucicesare A. Pisacane N. Rietti E. Bianchin M. (2008). Physical activity and dementia risk in the elderly: findings from a prospective Italian study. Neurology 70 1786–1794. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000296276.50595.8 Raven F. van der Zee E. A. Meerlo P. Havekes R. (2018). The role of sleep in regulating structural plasticity and synaptic strength: implications for memory and cognitive function. Sleep Med. Rev. 39 3–11. 10.1016/j.smrv.2017.05.002 28641933 Riske L. Thomas R. K. Baker G. B. Dursun S. M. (2017). Lactate in the brain: an update on its relevance to brain energy, neurons, glia and panic disorder. Ther. Adv. Psychopharmacol. 7 85–89. 10.1177/2045125316675579 28255438 Robergs R. A. Landwehr R. (2002). The surprising history of the “HRmax=220-age” equiation. J. Exerc. Physiol. 5 1–10 Rooks C. R. Thom N. J. McCully K. K. Dishman R. K. (2010). Effects of incremental exercise on cerebral oxygenation measured by near-infrared spectroscopy. A systematic review. Prog. Neurobiol. 92 134–150. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.06.002 20542078 Ross R. Goodpaster B. H. Koch L. G. Sarzynski M. A. Kohrt W. M. Johannsen N. M. (2019). Precision exercise medicine: understanding exercise response variability. Br. J. Sports Med. 53 1141–1153 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100328 30862704 Ross R. de Lannoy L. Stotz P. J. (2015). Separate effects of intensity and amount of exercise on interindividual cardiorespiratory fitness response. Mayo Clin. Proc. 90 1506–1514. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.07.024 26455890 Rovio S. Kåreholt I. Helkala E. -L. Viitanen M. Winblad B. Tuomilehto J. (2005). Leisure-time physical activity at midlife and the risk of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 4 705–711. 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70198-8 Sanders L. M. J. Hortobágyi T. La Bastide-van Gemert S. van der Zee E. A. van Heuvelen M. J. G. (2019). Dose-response relationship between exercise and cognitive function in older adults with and without cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 14:e0210036. 10.1371/journal.pone.0210036 30629631 Santos-Concejero J. Billaut F. Grobler L. Oliván J. Noakes T. D. Tucker R. (2015). Maintained cerebral oxygenation during maximal self-paced exercise in elite Kenyan runners. J. Appl. Physiol. 118 156–162. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00909.2014 25414248 Santos-Concejero J. Billaut F. Grobler L. Olivan J. Noakes T. D. Tucker R. (2017). Brain oxygenation declines in elite Kenyan runners during a maximal interval training session. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 117(5):1017–1024. 10.1007/s00421-017-3590-4 28321639 Sarzynski M. A. Rankinen T. Earnest C. P. Leon A. S. Rao D. C. Skinner J. S. (2013). Measured maximal heart rates compared to commonly used age-based prediction equations in the heritage family study. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 25 695–701. 10.1002/ajhb.22431 23913510 Scharhag-Rosenberger F. Meyer T. Gässler N. Faude O. Kindermann W. (2010). Exercise at given percentages of VO2max. Heterogeneous metabolic responses between individuals. J. Sci. Med. Sport 13 74–79. 10.1016/j.jsams.2008.12.626 19230766 Scharhag-Rosenberger F. Walitzek S. Kindermann W. Meyer T. (2012). Differences in adaptations to 1 year of aerobic endurance training: individual patterns of nonresponse. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 22 113–118. 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01139.x 20561283 Scheuer J. Tipton C. M. (1977). Cardiovascular adaptations to physical training. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 39 221–251. 10.1146/annurev.ph.39.030177.001253 Schiffer T. Schulte S. Sperlich B. Achtzehn S. Fricke H. Struder H. K. (2011). Lactate infusion at rest increases BDNF blood concentration in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 488 234–237. 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.11.035 21094220 Schmitt K. Holsboer-Trachsler E. Eckert A. (2016). BDNF in sleep, insomnia, and sleep deprivation. Ann. Med. 48 42–51. 10.3109/07853890.2015.1131327 26758201 Seidel O. Carius D. Kenville R. Ragert P. (2017). Motor learning in a complex balance task and associated neuroplasticity. A comparison between endurance athletes and non-athletes. J. Neurophysiol. 118 1849–1860. 10.1152/jn.00419.2017 28659467 Shargal E. Kislev-Cohen R. Zigel L. Epstein S. Pilz-Burstein R. Tenenbaum G. (2015). Age-related maximal heart rate: examination and refinement of prediction equations. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness 55 1207–1218. Silva V. A. Bottaro M. Justino M. A. Ribeiro M. M. Lima R. M. Oliveira R. J. (2007). Maximum heart rate in brazilian elderly women: comparing measured and predicted values. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 88 147–162. 10.1590/S0066-782X2007000300010 Skurvydas A. Brazaitis M. Kamandulis S. Sipaviciene S. (2010). Muscle damaging exercise affects isometric force fluctuation as well as intraindividual variability of cognitive function. J. Mot. Behav. 42 179–186. 10.1080/00222891003751835 20418220 Smiley-Oyen A. L. Lowry K. A. Francois S. J. Kohut M. L. Ekkekakis P. (2008). Exercise, fitness, and neurocognitive function in older adults: the “selective improvement” and “cardiovascular fitness” hypotheses. Ann. Behav. Med. 36 280–291. 10.1007/s12160-008-9064-5 18825471 Sobol N. A. Dall C. H. Høgh P. Hoffmann K. Frederiksen K. S. Vogel A. (2018). Change in fitness and the relation to change in cognition and neuropsychiatric symptoms after aerobic exercise in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 65 137–145. 10.3233/JAD-180253 30040719 Sobral-Monteiro-Junior R. Maillot P. Gatica-Rojas V. Ávila W. R. M. de Paula A. M. B. Guimarães A. L. S. (2019). Is the “lactormone” a key-factor for exercise-related neuroplasticity? A hypothesis based on an alternative lactate neurobiological pathway. Med. Hypotheses 123 63–66. 10.1016/j.mehy.2018.12.013 30696595 Soligard T. Schwellnus M. Alonso J. -M. Bahr R. Clarsen B. Dijkstra H. P. (2016). How much is too much? (Part 1) international olympic committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of injury. Br. J. Sports Med. 50 1030–1041. 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096581 27535989 Solomon T. P. J. (2018). Sources of inter-individual variability in the therapeutic response of blood glucose control to exercise in type 2 diabetes: going beyond exercise dose. Front. Physiol. 9:896. 10.3389/fphys.2018.00896 Sparks L. M. (2017). Exercise training response heterogeneity: physiological and molecular insights. Diabetologia 60 2329–2336. 10.1007/s00125-017-4461-6 29032385 Spiering B. A. Kraemer W. J. Anderson J. M. Armstrong L. E. Nindl B. C. Volek J. S. (2008). Resistance exercise biology: manipulation of resistance exercise programme variables determines the responses of cellular and molecular signalling pathways. Sports Med. 38 527–540. 10.2165/00007256-200838070-00001 18557656 Stern Y. MacKay-Brandt A. Lee S. McKinley P. McIntyre K. Razlighi Q. (2019). Effect of aerobic exercise on cognition in younger adults: a randomized clinical trial. Neurology 92 e905–e916. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007003 30700591 Stillman C. M. Cohen J. Lehman M. E. Erickson K. I. (2016). Mediators of physical activity on neurocognitive function: a review at multiple levels of analysis. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10:626. 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00626 28018195 Stillman C. M. Erickson K. I. (2018). Physical activity as a model for health neuroscience. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1428 103–111. 10.1111/nyas.13669 29732566 Stillman C. M. Uyar F. Huang H. Grove G. A. Watt J. C. Wollam M. E. (2018). Cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with enhanced hippocampal functional connectivity in healthy young adults. Hippocampus 28 239–247. 10.1002/hipo.22827 29341303 Stimpson N. J. Davison G. Javadi A.-H. (2018). Joggin’ the Noggin. Towards a physiological understanding of exercise-induced cognitive benefits. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 88 177–186. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.03.018 29572187 Stone M. Plisk S. Collins D. (2002). Training principles: evaluation of modes and methods of resistance training—a coaching perspective. Sports Biomech. 1 79–103. 10.1080/14763140208522788 14658137 Ströhlein J. K. van den Bongard F. Barthel T. Reinsberger C. (2017). Dose-response-relationship between physical activity and cognition in elderly. Dtsch. Z. Sportmed. 2017 234–242. 10.5960/dzsm.2017.300 Strzelczyk T. A. Quigg R. J. Pfeifer P. B. Parker M. A. Greenland P. (2001). Accuracy of estimating exercise prescription intensity in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. J. Cardiopulm. Rehabil. 21 158–163. Suwabe K. Byun K. Hyodo K. Reagh Z. M. Roberts J. M. Matsushita A. (2018). Reply to Gronwald et al. Exercise intensity does indeed matter; maximal oxygen uptake is the gold-standard indicator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115 E11892–E11893. 10.1073/pnas.1818247115 30559331 Suwabe K. Hyodo K. Byun K. Ochi G. Fukuie T. Shimizu T. (2017). Aerobic fitness associates with mnemonic discrimination as a mediator of physical activity effects. Evidence for memory flexibility in young adults. Sci. Rep. 7:5140. 10.1038/s41598-017-04850-y 28698596 Swinton P. A. Hemingway B. S. Saunders B. Gualano B. Dolan E. (2018). A statistical framework to interpret individual response to intervention: paving the way for personalized nutrition and exercise prescription. Front. Nutr. 5:41. 10.3389/fnut.2018.00041 29892599 Szabo A. N. McAuley E. Erickson K. I. Voss M. Prakash R. S. Mailey E. L. (2011). Cardiorespiratory fitness, hippocampal volume, and frequency of forgetting in older adults. Neuropsychology 25 545–553. 10.1037/a0022733 21500917 Taher M. Leen W. G. Wevers R. A. Willemsen M. A. (2016). Lactate and its many faces. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. 20 3–10. 10.1016/j.ejpn.2015.09.008 26481417 Tait J. L. Duckham R. L. Milte C. M. Main L. C. Daly R. M. (2017). Influence of sequential vs. simultaneous dual-task exercise training on cognitive function in older adults. Front. Aging Neurosci. 9:368. 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00368 Takehara N. Tsubaki A. Yamazaki Y. Kanaya C. Sato D. Morishita S. (2017). Changes in oxyhemoglobin concentration in the prefrontal cortex and primary motor cortex during low- and moderate-intensity exercise on a cycle ergometer. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 977 241–247. 10.1007/978-3-319-55231-6_33 28685452 Tan Z. S. Spartano N. L. Beiser A. S. DeCarli C. Auerbach S. H. Vasan R. S. (2017). Physical activity, brain volume, and dementia risk. The framingham study. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 72 789–795. 10.1093/gerona/glw130 27422439 Tanaka H. Monahan K. D. Seals D. R. (2001). Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 37 153–156. 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01054-8 Tempest G. D. Eston R. G. Parfitt G. (2014). Prefrontal cortex haemodynamics and affective responses during exercise. A multi-channel near infrared spectroscopy study. PLoS One 9:e95924. 10.1371/journal.pone.0095924 24788166 Thayer J. F. Åhs F. Fredrikson M. Sollers J. J. Wager T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of heart rate variability and neuroimaging studies. Implications for heart rate variability as a marker of stress and health. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36 747–756. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.009 22178086 Thompson P. M. Cannon T. D. Narr K. L. van Erp T. Poutanen V. P. Huttunen M. (2001). Genetic influences on brain structure. Nat. Neurosci. 4 1253–1258. 10.1038/nn758 11694885 Timmons J. A. (2011). Variability in training-induced skeletal muscle adaptation. J. Appl. Physiol. 110 846–853. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00934.2010 21030666 Timmons J. A. Knudsen S. Rankinen T. Koch L. G. Sarzynski M. Jensen T. (2010). Using molecular classification to predict gains in maximal aerobic capacity following endurance exercise training in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 108 1487–1496. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01295.2009 20133430 Toga A. W. Thompson P. M. (2005). Genetics of brain structure and intelligence. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 28 1–23. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135655 Toigo M. (2019). MuskelRevolution. Berlin: Springer. Törpel A. Herold F. Hamacher D. Müller N. G. Schega L. (2018). Strengthening the brain—is resistance training with blood flow restriction an effective strategy for cognitive improvement? J. Clin. Med. 7:E377. 10.3390/jcm7100337 30304785 Trajkovska V. Marcussen A. B. Vinberg M. Hartvig P. Aznar S. Knudsen G. M. (2007). Measurements of brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Methodological aspects and demographical data. Brain Res. Bull. 73 143–149. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.03.009 17499648 Tsukamoto H. Suga T. Takenaka S. Tanaka D. Takeuchi T. Hamaoka T. (2016). Repeated high-intensity interval exercise shortens the positive effect on executive function during post-exercise recovery in healthy young males. Physiol. Behav. 160 26–34. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.03.029 27060507 van Hall G. Stromstad M. Rasmussen P. Jans O. Zaar M. Gam C. (2009). Blood lactate is an important energy source for the human brain. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 29 1121–1129. 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.35 19337275 Vanrenterghem J. Nedergaard N. J. Robinson M. A. Drust B. (2017). Training load monitoring in team sports. A novel framework separating physiological and biomechanical load-adaptation pathways. Sports Med. 47 2135–2142. 10.1007/s40279-017-0714-2 28283992 Verstynen T. D. Lynch B. Miller D. L. Voss M. W. Prakash R. S. Chaddock L. (2012). Caudate nucleus volume mediates the link between cardiorespiratory fitness and cognitive flexibility in older adults. J. Aging Res. 2012:939285. 10.1155/2012/939285 22900181 Vesterinen V. Häkkinen K. Hynynen E. Mikkola J. Hokka L. Nummela A. (2013). Heart rate variability in prediction of individual adaptation to endurance training in recreational endurance runners. Scan. J. Med. Sci. Sports 23 171–180. 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01365.x 21812828 Vesterinen V. Nummela A. Heikura I. Laine T. Hynynen E. Botella J. (2016). Individual endurance training prescription with heart rate variability. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 48 1347–1354. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000910 26909534 Vidoni E. D. Honea R. A. Billinger S. A. Swerdlow R. H. Burns J. M. (2012). Cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with atrophy in Alzheimer’s and aging over 2 years. Neurobiol. Aging 33 1624–1632. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.03.016 21531480 Voelcker-Rehage C. Godde B. Staudinger U. M. (2011). Cardiovascular and coordination training differentially improve cognitive performance and neural processing in older adults. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5:26. 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00026 21441997 Voils C. I. Chang Y. Crandell J. Leeman J. Sandelowski M. Maciejewski M. L. (2012). Informing the dosing of interventions in randomized trials. Contemp. Clin. Trials 33 1225–1230. 10.1016/j.cct.2012.07.011 22841930 Voisin S. Jacques M. Lucia A. Bishop D. J. Eynon N. (2019). Statistical considerations for exercise protocols aimed at measuring trainability. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 47 37–45. 10.1249/JES.0000000000000176 30334853 Vollaard N. B. J. Constantin-Teodosiu D. Fredriksson K. Rooyackers O. Jansson E. Greenhaff P. L. (2009). Systematic analysis of adaptations in aerobic capacity and submaximal energy metabolism provides a unique insight into determinants of human aerobic performance. J. Appl. Physiol. 106 1479–1486. 10.1152/japplphysiol.91453.2008 19196912 Voss M. W. (2016). “The chronic exercise–cognition interaction,” in Exercise-Cognition Interaction ed. McMorris T. (Elsevier: San Diego, CA), 187–209. Voss M. W. Erickson K. I. Prakash R. S. Chaddock L. Kim J. S. Alves H. (2013a). Neurobiological markers of exercise-related brain plasticity in older adults. Brain Behav. Immun. 28 90–99. 10.1016/j.bbi.2012.10.021 23123199 Voss M. W. Vivar C. Kramer A. F. van Praag H. (2013b). Bridging animal and human models of exercise-induced brain plasticity. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17 525–544. 10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.001 24029446 Voss M. W. Nagamatsu L. S. Liu-Ambrose T. Kramer A. F. (2011). Exercise, brain, and cognition across the life span. J. Appl. Physiol. 111 1505–1513. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00210.2011 21527670 Wallace L. K. Slattery K. M. Coutts A. J. (2009). The ecological validity and application of the session-RPE method for quantifying training loads in swimming. J. Strength Cond. Res. 23 33–38. 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181874512 19002069 Walsh J. J. Edgett B. A. Tschakovsky M. E. Gurd B. J. (2015). Fasting and exercise differentially regulate BDNF mRNA expression in human skeletal muscle. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 40 96–98. 10.1139/apnm-2014-0290 25494871 Wang L. Yoshikawa T. Hara T. Nakao H. Suzuki T. Fujimoto S. (2006). Which common NIRS variable reflects muscle estimated lactate threshold most closely? Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 31 612–620. 10.1139/h06-069 17111016 Wasfy M. M. Baggish A. L. (2016). Exercise dose in clinical practice. Circulation 133 2297–2313. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.018093 27267537 Weatherwax R. M. Harris N. K. Kilding A. E. Dalleck L. C. (2016). The incidence of training responsiveness to cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiometabolic measurements following individualized and standardized exercise prescription: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 17:601. 10.1186/s13063-016-1735-0 27993169 Weltman A. Snead D. Seip R. Schurrer R. Weltman J. Rutt R. (1990). Percentages of maximal heart rate, heart rate reserve and VO2max for determining endurance training intensity in male runners. Int. J. Sports Med. 11 218–222. 10.1055/s-2007-1024795 2373580 Weltman A. Weltman J. Rutt R. Seip R. Levine S. Snead D. (1989). Percentages of maximal heart rate, heart rate reserve, and VO2peak for determining endurance training intensity in sedentary women. Int. J. Sports Med. 10 212–216. 10.1055/s-2007-1024903 2674039 Wengaard E. Kristoffersen M. Harris A. Gundersen H. (2017). Cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with selective attention in healthy male high-school students. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11:330. 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00330 28701935 Williams C. J. Gurd B. J. Bonafiglia J. T. Voisin S. Li Z. Harvey N. (2019). A multi-center comparison of o2peak trainability between interval training and moderate intensity continuous training. Front. Physiol. 10:480. 10.3389/fphys.2019.00019 Williamson P. J. Atkinson G. Batterham A. M. (2017). Inter-individual responses of maximal oxygen uptake to exercise training: a critical review. Sports Med. 47 1501–1513. 10.1007/s40279-017-0680-8 28097487 Wilson G. C. Mavros Y. Tajouri L. Singh M. F. (2019). The role of genetic profile in functional performance adaptations to exercise training or physical activity: a systematic review of the literature. J. Aging Phys. Act. 27 594–616. 10.1123/japa.2018-0155 30676214 Winters-Stone K. M. Neil S. E. Campbell K. L. (2014). Attention to principles of exercise training: a review of exercise studies for survivors of cancers other than breast. Br. J. Sports Med. 48 987–995. 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091732 23293010 Xu G. Mao Z. Ye Y. Lv K. (2011). Relationship between muscle oxygenation by NIRS and blood lactate. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 277:12042. 10.1088/1742-6596/277/1/012042 Yamazaki Y. Sato D. Yamashiro K. Tsubaki A. Takehara N. Uetake Y. (2018). Inter-individual differences in working memory improvement after acute mild and moderate aerobic exercise. PLoS One 13:e0210053. 10.1371/journal.pone.0210053 30596797 Yamazaki Y. Sato D. Yamashiro K. Tsubaki A. Yamaguchi Y. Takehara N. (2017). Inter-individual differences in exercise-induced spatial working memory improvement. A near-infrared spectroscopy study. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 977 81–88. 10.1007/978-3-319-55231-6_12 28685431 ZekiAl Hazzouri A. Haan M. N. Deng Y. Neuhaus J. Yaffe K. (2014). Reduced heart rate variability is associated with worse cognitive performance in elderly Mexican Americans. Hypertension 63 181–187. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01888 24144650 Zhu N. Suarez-Lopez J. R. Sidney S. Sternfeld B. Schreiner P. J. Carnethon M. R. (2010). Longitudinal examination of age-predicted symptom-limited exercise maximum HR. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 42 1519–1527. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181cf8242 20639723 Zimmer P. Oberste M. Bloch W. (2015). Einfluss von sport auf das zentrale nervensystem – molekulare und zelluläre wirkmechanismen. Dtsch. Z. Sportmed. 2015 42–49. 10.5960/dzsm.2015.164