Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Psychol., 25 March 2021
Sec. Psychology of Language

Corrigendum: The Trade-Off Between Format Familiarity and Word-Segmentation Facilitation in Chinese Reading

  • Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences, Institute of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China

A Corrigendum on
The Trade-Off Between Format Familiarity and Word-Segmentation Facilitation in Chinese Reading

by Chen, M., Wang, Y., Zhao, B., Li, X., and Bai, X. (2021). Front. Psychol. 12:602931. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.602931

In the original article, we neglected to include the following funding information:

‘Ministry of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences Research Youth Project, China, 18YJC190023.’

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Keywords: trade-off, format familiarity, word segmentation, Chinese reading, eye movements

Citation: Chen M, Wang Y, Zhao B, Li X and Bai X (2021) Corrigendum: The Trade-Off Between Format Familiarity and Word-Segmentation Facilitation in Chinese Reading. Front. Psychol. 12:665606. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.665606

Received: 08 February 2021; Accepted: 24 February 2021;
Published: 25 March 2021.

Approved by:

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Copyright © 2021 Chen, Wang, Zhao, Li and Bai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yongsheng Wang, wangyongsheng@mail.tjnu.edu.cn; Xuejun Bai, bxuejun@126.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.