Feelings of tension, stress, and anxiety are inherent challenges of demanding professions (Dewe et al., 2012), and teaching as a difficult vocation is not an exception by any means. These unpleasant feelings may lead to undesirable and negative consequences in the workplace. In classroom contexts, for instance, teachers who commonly experience prolonged, excessive stress and apprehension are prone to a negative state of mind called “burnout” (Fathi et al., 2021). Burnout as a psychological construct generally refers to “the state of physical and emotional depletion resulting from conditions of work” (Freudenberger, 1974, p. 161). Applied to the educational context, teacher burnout refers to a sense of “emotional exhaustion,” “depersonalization,” and “reduced personal accomplishment” that teachers may experience at a given point throughout their professional life (Maslach et al., 2001). As Maslach and Leiter (2016) noted, emotional exhaustion occurs when work overload and job-related stressors make teachers feel empty. Depersonalization also happens when teachers hold unfavorable and negative attitudes toward their vocation, their pupils, their colleagues, and the educational setting (Leiter and Maslach, 2016). Finally, reduced personal accomplishment pertains to a mental state that teachers perceive their teaching competence and abilities to be inadequate (Zhaleh et al., 2018). Put simply, this emotional state emerges when an individual teacher underestimates his/her own productivity (Seifalian and Derakhshan, 2018).

As put forward by Sabagh et al. (2018), teachers who feel emotionally and physically exhausted, hold negative viewpoints about their job, and underestimate their job-related capabilities are unable to effectively do the tasks they are responsible for. Put simply, an individual teacher who perceives himself/herself to be in a state of “burnout” cannot be a successful instructor anymore (Brasfield et al., 2019). This is due to the fact that the way teachers perform in classroom contexts is subjected to their mental and emotional state (Malmir and Mohammadi, 2008; Burić and Macuka, 2018; Greenier et al., 2021; Xie, 2021). Because of the adverse effects of burnout on teachers’ professional performance, factors preventing this mental state need to be discovered. To answer this necessity, numerous researchers have assessed the impact of emotional and psychological factors on teacher burnout (e.g., Vaezi and Fallah, 2011; Wang et al., 2015b; Lou and Chen, 2016; Tsang, 2018; Lu et al., 2019; Xu, 2019; Guan, 2020, to cite a few). Among different emotional and psychological factors, many scholars have focused on grit and self-efficacy, which are the focus of this study as well.

Grit generally refers to “one’s passion and perseverance for long term goals” (Duckworth et al., 2007, p. 1089). Extending this definition to the context of education, Robertson-Kraft and Duckworth (2014) described teacher grit as an individual teacher’s determination and persistence to lead his/her pupils to academic success. In the domain of second/foreign language education, teacher grit pertains to teachers’ perseverance and strong desire to guide their learners toward L2 success (MacIntyre and Khajavy, 2021). As Duckworth et al. (2009) mentioned, grit enables teachers to handle the challenges and difficulties of their profession, on the one hand, and to accomplish their profession-related responsibilities, on the other hand. That is, grittier teachers are more likely to succeed in their careers.

Another emotional factor that may negatively predict teacher burnout is self-efficacy, which generally pertains to “beliefs in one’s capabilities to organize and execute the courses of action required to produce given attainments” (Bandura, 1997, p. 4). In light of this conceptualization, Tschannen-Moran and Hoy (2001) defined teacher self-efficacy as “teachers’ judgment of their own capability to bring about desired outcomes of student learning, even among those students who may be difficult or unmotivated” (p. 783). Put simply, teachers’ sense of efficacy pertains to the degree to which a teacher thinks he/she has the potential to positively influence students’ learning outcomes (Fathi and Derakhshan, 2019). As Safari (2021) noted, a firm belief in professional capabilities empowers teachers to cope with the challenges of their vocation. Similarly, Shoji et al. (2016) submitted that self-efficacious teachers commonly show more perseverance against job-related stressors, pressures, and challenges.

Given the significant role of grit and self-efficacy in mitigating the causes of teacher burnout (Duckworth et al., 2009; Shoji et al., 2016), several researchers have empirically examined the effects of these two emotional and psychological factors on EFL teachers’ burnout (e.g., Federici and Skaalvik, 2012; Khezerlou, 2013; Wang et al., 2015a; Zhu et al., 2018; Fabelico and Afalla, 2020; Fathi and Saeedian, 2020; Salehizadeh et al., 2020, to cite a few). However, compared to teacher self-efficacy, less attention has been devoted to the impact of teacher grit. Furthermore, no empirical or review study has simultaneously focused on the impact of grit and self-efficacy on EFL teachers’ burnout. The current review study is an endeavor to fill this gap by focusing on the effects of EFL teachers’ grit and self-efficacy on their burnout.

To date, a plethora of research has been done on the impact of EFL teachers’ self-efficacy on their burnout (e.g., Federici and Skaalvik, 2012; Khezerlou, 2013; Yazdi et al., 2014; Zhu et al., 2018; Fathi and Saeedian, 2020; Fathi et al., 2021; Han and Wang, 2021, to cite a few). For instance, Zhu et al. (2018) examined the effect of self-efficacy on Chinese teachers’ burnout. To this end, 1892 Chinese teachers were asked to fill two self-reported questionnaires. Assessing the correlations of the questionnaires, they found a negative association between Chinese teachers’ self-efficacy and burnout. The results of structural equation modeling also indicated that Chinese teachers’ self-efficacy can drastically influence their burnout. In another study, Fathi and Saeedian (2020) delved into the impact of self-efficacy beliefs on Iranian EFL teachers’ burnout. To do so, 213 EFL teachers were opted from different universities and institutes in Iran. They were invited to respond to two valid scales. Using structural equation modeling, the researchers found that teachers’ sense of efficacy can significantly predict their burnout in a negative way. Besides, some studies have also been performed on the effects of EFL teachers’ grit on their burnout (e.g., Fabelico and Afalla, 2020; Heruela, 2021). For instance, Fabelico and Afalla (2020) explored the influence of grit on Philippines teachers’ burnout. To this aim, 128 university teachers were asked to answer two reliable inventories. The results demonstrated that grit can negatively predict their Philippines teachers’ burnout.

So far, the concepts of teacher grit, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher burnout were clearly described. Moreover, the dimensions and components of these variables were outlined. Furthermore, the role of grit and self-efficacy in reducing EFL teachers’ burnout was elucidated using theoretical and empirical evidence. Relying on the available evidence, one can logically conclude that both grit and self-efficacy can negatively predict EFL teachers’ burnout. Put simply, grittier and self-efficacious teachers are less likely to experience burnout during their professional life. This outcome seems insightful and instructive for all English language teachers in any EFL context. Given the importance of self-efficacy beliefs in curbing teacher burnout, EFL teachers should have faith in their professional abilities in order to energetically pursue their vocation. The finding of this review appears to be enlightening for teacher educators as well. As the outcomes of this review study revealed, teachers with strong desire and perseverance can handle the job-related stressors, which is the main cause of burnout. Accordingly, teacher educators need to teach their trainees how to persevere against the pressures, challenges, and problems of teaching profession.

The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.