Editorial: Biocentric development: studies on the consequences of COVID-19 towards human growth and sustainability

COPYRIGHT © 2023 Stueck, Kaloeti, Kankeh, Farrokhi and Bidzan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. Editorial: Biocentric development: studies on the consequences of COVID-19 towards human growth and sustainability

This Research Topic on "Biocentric development and COVID-19" has two main focuses. Firstly, to publish studies that scientifically elaborate the positive and negative consequences of the COVID-19 situation and, secondly, to make deductions related to biocentric development as an alternative mission search. The focus is not primarily on overcoming the manufactured COVID-19 crisis from an anthropocentric perspective (anthro = human, center = center) but also from a biocentric approach. Why? The global COVID-19 events, climate catastrophes, and countless environmental catastrophes show a pattern, namely, that humans have increasingly detached themselves from nature and its totality through their way of life and inner attitudes. For example, through inner perspectives -that nature and life are exploitable resources, -that there is a material world that will grow indefinitely, -that man is the reference point for all developments, and that all other life forms are subordinate to him.
If one forms the dual expression of these attitudes (dualization) to restore balance, at least mentally, three important biocentric statements emerge: First, nature and its associated life have an intrinsic value that humans must experience effectively. Toro (2010) described the importance of the inner experience in education, therapy, and personal growth and how to develop it using the biocentric method of "Biodanza." This method, aiming to increase reverence for life is well-researched (Stueck and Tofts, 2016;Stueck and Villegas, 2018;Stueck et al., 2019).
Second, there is a material and a non-material, spiritual level that needs to be integrated with life and health and which is not a matter of belief but of logical deduction and increasing research (MacDonald et al., 2015;Stueck, 2021;Dewi et al., 2023).
Thirdly, that man is not only the anthropocentric and egocentric reference point of life but there is also a biocentric reference level (bios = life, center = center). This means that there is a connection between outer and inner natural space, as Stueck (2021) stated based on Naess (1989Naess ( , 1998. In the "Deep Ecology" . /fpsyg. . approach they postulated that nature, the "complex of living beings, " is unfortunately seen as something separate from humans. Biocentric methods (interventions) to experience an observe the inner natural space are among others, Biodanza and Meditation (see Figure 1, point 9). What is the biocentric reference level? Schweitzer (1966) already described it as a way of life where individuals live with compassion and respect for all living things-humans, animals, and plants. Toro (2010) developed ideas on a biocentric principle and education, which emphasise about the protection of life and thus the affective connection (empathy) to oneself, others, and all life forms in nature. This includes expanding ethical awareness about the intrinsic value of life and nature at the center of consideration and research. Stueck (2021) defined and studied it in a Relative Biocentric Health Theory (RBHT) related to COVID-19, so called biocentric borders (see Figure 1, number 1), which are external and internal factors that hinder the normal process of autoregulation (see Figure 1, number 2) in the biocentric core (see Figure 1, number 3) of a living system. In humans, this perspective decreases effective communication and empathy for all natural life forms and the empathy for oneself (see Figure 1, number 4) and salutogenesis (see Figure 1, number 5). Research has shown that biocentric borders, like chronic stress, exhaustion, and hypersensitivity, lower the humans' empathic behavior (Stueck, 2008;Stueck et al., 2013). This "dehumanization" because of the biocentric borders (see Figure 1, number 1) of chronic stress and exhaustion, combined with a missing empathy, are accompanied by other affective pathologies. This includes addictions (Kaloeti and Kusnadi, 2022), but also the devaluation of others (racism, discrimination, bullying) (Kaloeti et al., 2021), fears of nature, fears of life, fears to be empathic and an inability to express oneself or to communicate (Toro, 2010). For this reason, further research on a biocentric evidence-based intervention, e.g. "School of Empathy, "

FIGURE
The Relative Biocentric Health Theory related to pandemic situations (Stueck, , take-out - Figure ).
for children and adults would be helpful (Stueck, 2010;Stück, 2013;Widiasmara et al., 2018). Related to this model (see Figure 1), the topic articles in this Research Topic on "Biocentric development and COVID-19" can be categorized into three aspects: The first aspect is research on Biocentric Borders during COVID-19 (Figure 1, point 1). Biocentric borders can hinder the ethics of coexistence and the deeper connection of human beings with themselves, others, and with nature. In this context, the article by Grabowski et al. found that the associated stress levels during the lockdown in Italy and Poland were related to higher activity levels. Furthermore, it was reported that less isolation correlated with less stress. The importance and the effects of social connection and support in combination with functioning emotional coping strategies on reducing stress, anxiety, and depression were underlined in a second article by Akbar and Aisyawati on this topic.
The second aspect explored by articles in this Research Topic is research about the balance between the internal and external orientation (see Figure 1, point 6) of people's perceptions during COVID-19. In this respect, the article by Nomura et al. is a significant contribution to the importance of counseling to increase reflexive activity (internal orientation) in students in difficult mental situations during COVID-19 to prevent depression and suicide. The better people can reflect on internal states, selfdefense mechanisms, and dysregulated non-biocentric attitudes, the healthier they become or remain during COVID-19 (see Figure 1, point 2, 5, 6).
In studies on Relative Biocentric Health Theory (RBHT, Stueck, 2021) during COVID-19, people who developed a higher inner orientation during the pandemic crisis, e.g., by practicing psychotherapy, Biodanza, or meditation, were more connected to their "biocentric core" (Stueck, 2021 This means they are significantly more peaceful, autonomous, empathic, and capable of love (see Figure 1, point 3, 4). They also show different interpretations of the pandemic situations and less problematic anxiety expression styles, such as fewer sensitizers and displacement patterns (Mueller-Haugk and Stueck, 2023, see Figure 1, point 6). Unfortunately, during the COVID-19 lockdowns, no government-sponsored programs that systematically promoted inner orientation in children and adults and addressed people's inner problems even though scientists suggested the use of reflexive methods to increase self-efficacy in hospital staff (Bidzan et al., 2020, see Figure 1, resources, point 7) or self-management and psychological strategies to overcome difficulties during COVID-19 (Khankeh et al., 2021(Khankeh et al., , 2022, see Figure 1, point 8).
The final aspect explored in this Research Topic includes research on inter-and intra-individual differences during COVID-19: this third category of articles on "Biocentric development and COVID-19" concerns people's inter-and intra-individual differences, which should be regarded when intervention strategies are selected because every human being is unique.
Unfortunately, this ability to differentiate has been missing from pandemic management in many countries (Khankeh et al., 2020;Bidzan-Bluma et al., 2021) (see Figure 1, point 6). The third biocentric basic assumption is explored in the topic through three articles. The first article by Candeias et al. concludes that the quality of life, optimism, and wellbeing are affected differently during the pandemic. This depends on the country and age group, suggesting individual differences between cultures and age groups and the need for specific interventions. A second article on this topic, by Islam et al. investigates the particular aspect of coping with COVID-19 and examines public health initiatives in Bangladesh that use biocentric approaches to mitigate the pandemic's potential financial and psychological impact on impoverished urban dwellers in Bangladesh. A third topic article in the context of interindividual differences during COVID-19 by Kaloeti et al. takes up gender differentiation concerning COVID-19, finding that women in Indonesia were more vulnerable to traumatic reactions.
The seven articles included in this topic indicate that there is a need for further research on these three biocentric aspects and that scientific studies on biocentric fields of action in combination with anthropocentric methods need to be conducted. This will ensure a practical transfer of the biocentric ideas in different working areas, e.g., to treat Long-COVID illnesses or to strengthen biocentric resources and enable humans for biocentric growth and sustainable development.

Author contributions
DK finalized the manuscript. All authors contributed to the conception and design of the editorial, manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest
MS was employed by International Biocentric Research Academy (IBRA).
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.