Actual and symbolic prisons, Black men, and the freedom-unfreedom paradox: interrogating the bad faith of racialized oppression in a post-accountable United States

Drawing on systemic racism theory, white racial framing and the notion of bad faith as the connecting, justifying thread between ideals of freedom and equality and actions realizing unfreedom and inequities, this essay explores the alchemy of race, masculinity, and racialized oppression and its consequences for Black men past and present in United States society. This essay’s aim is to trace the historical ideologies and cultural practices, relations, and normative standards that have contributed to, and hence must be challenged to confront, the inequitable, race-based relations of power, and privilege at the root of institutionalized injustices. To do so, this essay interrogates the dissonance of bad faith as a corrective mode of truth telling to highlight and tap the equity potential of Black men’s collective, historical rejections of the White mainstream’s conflicting definitions and deceptive reasonings requisite for pushing toward racial justice, healing, and peace.


Introduction
And, in fact, the truth about the Black American man, as a historical entity and as a human being, has been hidden from him, deliberately and cruelly; the power of the white world is threatened whenever a Black American man refuses to accept the white world's definitions.So every attempt is made to cut that Black American man down-not only was made yesterday but is made today (Baldwin, 1962(Baldwin, /2021, p. 69), p. 69).
Smith and Harris 10. 3389/fpsyg.2023.1235185Frontiers in Psychology 02 frontiersin.org(1962/2021); Floyd lost his life while handcuffed as the now former police officer Chauvin knelt on Floyd's neck for nearly 10 min (Moody-Ramirez et al., 2021).Beyond Mr. Floyd, as a visit to "The Legacy Museum: From Slavery to Mass Incarceration" in Montgomery, Alabama (Pierce and Heitz, 2020) captures, there are voluminous recent and less remembered examples of Black men deemed threats to United States society's White mainstream (Whitestream) and cut down by White violence for refusing to accept the white world's definitions (Baldwin, 1962(Baldwin, /2021)).To say the names of only six other Black men also who likewise have more recently gained unwanted membership in this race-based group built on White violence (Cottman et al., 2023): Ahmaud Arbery, Daunte Wright, Jordan Neely, Tamir Rice, Trayvon Martin, and Jawan Dallas (Nicholson et al., 2009;Weissinger et al., 2017).That whole groups of people must take to the streets to proclaim "Black Lives Matter" demonstrates the enduring veracity of points of Baldwin (1962Baldwin ( /2021) ) about Black men and their historical role in United States society (Szetela, 2020).
Manifested by the historically, racially patterned murders of unarmed Black men, then, the bodies of Black men in United States society have consistently served as primary targets and repositories of the harms and traumas realized by the deeply systemic, inequitable allocations of power, distribution of valued resources, and consequent abuses incurred by representatives of its Whitestream across generations (Ferreira da Silva, 2009;Feagin and Ducey, 2018).What is it about Black men that makes them a consistent threat deemed so significant to United States society's Whitestream that every effort continues to be made to cut them down using racial violence, for the public good no less (Patterson, 2018;Wilderson, 2020)?
As Baldwin (1962Baldwin ( /2021) explains above, it is the violence itself of United States society against Black men that is a site rich with potential answers to this question of the Whitestream's enduring use of Black men as a historical entity and human beings; the patterned, state-sanctioned violence, including threats of violence, against the bodies and lives of Black men are more than simple reactionary responses to racial prejudices, biases, and antipathy for Blackness (i.e., characteristics, aims, goals, histories, and accomplishments associated with Black people; Kelley, 1997;Mills, 1997;Bonilla-Silva, 2003).Rather, the very degree of the Whitestream's rage and perceived need for elimination-oriented violence against Black men is itself a red flag marking the immensity of the collective potential of Black men to confront and transform United States society's existing racial status quo privileging Whiteness (i.e., characteristics, goals, interests, values, and histories associated with White people as a group) toward more humanized, participatory social spaces and relations (Yancy and Alcoff, 2016;Feagin, 2020).
Specifically, Baldwin (1962Baldwin ( /2021) ) above directs us to answers by highlighting the effects of historical power asymmetries.First, he emphasizes the Whitestream's lethal historical subjugation of Black men in the United States.Next, he emphasizes the dynamic, immense power Black males wield and are endowed with the capacity to challenge White racial dominance.Then, he argues that the severity of White people's violence against Black males is proportional to the power of Black men to confront institutionalized racism and inequality; in short, the degree of United States society's rage and violence against Black men in society matches the degree to which Black men collectively threaten to disrupt and overturn the patterned imbalances of power and access to resources and opportunities privileging White people collectively across its valued institutions.
If, as Baldwin (1962Baldwin ( /2021) ) observes, above and as the degree of United States society's patterned violence against Black men and their bodies indicate, Black men collectively share this immense transformative potential for humanized living and the disruption of historical imbalances of power and abuses, then how can this equity potential be tapped toward racial healing, peace, and the thriving and wellbeing of individuals and groups and against the patterned oppressions so many continue to endure?Put simply, how is that raced, gendered equity potential constituted today and how can it be applied?
Drawing on systemic racism theory (Feagin, 2006), White racial framing (Feagin, 2020), and the notion of bad faith (Gordon, 1995(Gordon, , 1997) ) as the connecting, justifying thread between ideals of freedom and equality and actions realizing unfreedom and inequities, this essay explores the alchemy of race, masculinity, and racialized oppression and its consequences for Black men past and present in United States society (Hooks, 2004b;Yancy, 2022).This essay's aim is to trace the historical ideologies and cultural practices, relations, and normative standards that have contributed to, and hence must be challenged to confront, the inequitable, race-based relations of power and privilege at the root of institutionalized injustices (Tichavakunda, 2021).To do so, this essay interrogates the dissonance of bad faith (Gordon, 1995(Gordon, , 1997) ) as a corrective mode of truth telling to highlight and tap the equity potential of Black men's collective, historical rejections of the Whitestreams's conflicting definitions, and deceptive reasonings requisite for pushing toward racial justice, healing, and peace (Lozenski, 2016).

The freedom-unfreedom paradox, oppression, bad faith, and healing
The United States has always viewed itself as exceptional (Foner, 1999).And, indeed, the United States is exceptional-exceptional as a nation that incarcerates more of its citizens than any other country in the world (Alexander, 2010(Alexander, ,2020)).How is it that in this land of freedom, entire groups of people feel compelled to take to the streets regularly to assert that their lives matter and that they should not be shot and murdered arbitrarily by police?These apparent contradictions filled with violence reflect American society's longstanding paradox of official, full-throated freedom (for some) coupled with disavowed, racialized unfreedom (faced by minoritized others; Mills, 1997), a kind of herrenvolk freedom (Glaude Jr, 2017).
This seeming contradiction between freedom and unfreedom, in turn, is a manifestation of systemic oppression based on bad faith.Systemic oppression refers to the patterned systems of practices, norms, rules, methods, laws, and relationships that uphold and reinforce the Whitestream's collective group position.
Bad faith informs, operationalizes, and manipulates racial dominance and other difference-based forms of oppression (e.g., sexism, ableism, classism, homophobia, etc.; Gordon, 1997).Bad faith denotes unconscious or intentional self-deception; the term refers to people's tendency to lie to themselves to protect their feelings, avoid having to take corrective action, and maintain a positive self-image (Gordon, 1995); it also has legal connotations used to describe intentionally dishonest acts committed within contractual obligations  (Tichavakunda, 2021).Importantly, bad faith prevents critical dialogue by purposely or unintentionally evading the truth, choice, and responsibility in favor of deceptive, selective memory, falsehoods, and distortions.
Theorizing systemic oppression and its connections to bad faith Systemic racialized oppression is rooted in bad faith; it is sanctioned by bad faith; and it is an expression of bad faith.To comprehend and then combat systemic oppression, it is necessary to identify and interrupt the logic of bad faith that binds the apparent paradox of freedom and unfreedom in United States society.
In today's ostensibly post-racial society, the notion of being accused of racism or labeled a racist offends most White Americans.Racism, for many White Americans, is synonymous with racial extremists on the fringes of society (e.g., neo-Nazis); racists are "those" individuals who don white hoods and swastikas tattooed on their arms--individuals who are appropriately far removed from the mainstream of society (Smith, 2005).From this vantage point, race and prejudice are associated with individuals' seemingly irrational actions, thoughts, and decisions; accordingly, from this perspective, friendships with individuals from minoritized groups, then, are sufficient as evidence of anti-racism and good moral character among White people (Jackman, 1986).
To eradicate oppression, however, there is no precedent for correcting people's flawed reasoning (DuBois, 1899(DuBois, /2023;;Fanon, 2013).Furthermore, systemic racial oppression is manifested at both the macro-and micro-levels of society (Feagin, 2006(Feagin, , 2020)).White superiority is enacted by individuals and groups socialized to apply White racial framings of society to make sense of and guide their actions, interactions, and decisions based on the epistemological reasoning that White ways of knowing and being are superior to those of others (Arendt, 2020).

Unfreedom and Black male bodies
As Baldwin (1962Baldwin ( /2021) ) indicates above, White domination over the Black body has been relentlessly pursued throughout United States history, both physically and symbolically with Black men symbolically demonized as criminal and dangerous and thus negative imagery providing some justification for enacted physical containment of, and violence against, their bodies (Dean, 2000; Wacquant, 2000).Indeed, in the United States, Black men and boys continue to be unfree at much more acutely concentrated rates as compared to their White counterparts (Alexander, 2010(Alexander, ,2020)); in 2019 at midyear, the incarceration rate for Black people in the United States held steady at 600 per 100,000 individuals incarcerated, a rate more than three times the rate for White people (Zeng and Minton, 2021).Since 2015, the daily incarceration rate for Black men ages 16-34 is 9.1 percent of their identity group or population as compared to 1.6 percent of the population of young White men, and 3.9 percent of the population of young Latinx men (Pettit and Gutierrez, 2018).
Nonetheless, one need not be physically confined to be imprisoned-one's body behind constraining iron bars; symbolic incarceration is likewise a lived realty for far too many Black males in United States society's Whitestream, a type of imprisonment of the mind that then imprisons the body despite lack of any physically constraining iron bars (Turner, 2019;Lomotey and Smith, 2023).While fatality rates continue to decline among men of other races and ethnicities, they continue to rise among Black men (Mutua, 2006;Dodson, 2021).With Black men consistently represented by United States society's Whitestream as dangerous and potential and budding threats, gun violence is increasingly the primary contributor to the high death rates among Black men (Benjamins and De Maio, 2021).Among males aged 10-25, Black-on-Black homicide is a significant public health crisis as negative images, symbols, and representations are linked to cultural practices and internalized and acted on by larger society and targeting Black men (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2006;Sum et al., 2009;Zimring, 2017).
Similarly, the rate at which Black male students are suspended and expelled from public school is three times that of their White peers (Skiba et al., 2000;Bottiani et al., 2018).Despite more than 50 years of racial desegregation and school reform efforts (Boyd, 2009), Black male students are routinely punished more severely, assigned to lowerability groups, and expelled at a higher rate than their white counterparts (Bradshaw et al., 2010).Seen as likely, emerging, and existing problems or dangerous to others, especially White students, Black male learners are consistently taught by teachers who would prefer not to work with them (Irvine, 1990;Fuller, 1992;Delpit, 1995;Hale, 2001) and subjected to harsher disciplinary practices as compared to their peers in all other racial and ethnic groups (Voelkl et al., 1999;Noguera, 2003;Cook et al., 2018).
The well-documented relationship between United States public schools and prisons creates a "deadly symbiosis" (Wacquant, 2000) between education and the incarceration of Black males (King, 2005;Kim et al., 2010;McIntosh et al., 2021).How does this unfreedom of Black men persist in the land of the free (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2014; Reed et al., 2014)?How does bad faith transform over time to justify and sustain society's paradox of freedom and unfreedom as it mutates into ever varying forms and configurations?

Tracking bad faith historically: European contact and race
The dominant ideologies of Black males as subhuman, violent, criminal, and bad are indications of deeply rooted bad faith (Grant, 2019); bad faith logic enables the Whitestream to maintain a pleasing collective self-image while perpetuating violence against any threat to this pleasing self-image of superiority (Tichavakunda, 2021).
Because evidence is superfluous within the logic of bad faith (Gordon, 1995), these dominant negative ideologies regarding Black people and Black males especially persist across generations (Sullivan and Cross, 2016).No quantity of counterevidence is sufficient to refute anti-Black prejudice.The first contact between Europeans and Africans, during which Africa's natural and human resources were violently exploited, is the source of much of the anti-Black (mis) information used to create the perception of Black unfreedom in a free nation (Karenga, 2002).
Specifically, Western colonial powers created race-based distinctions according to skin color, hair texture, genitalia, facial features, and other phenotypical characteristics to differentiate themselves from Africans and justify violent oppression (Rodney, 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1235185Frontiers in Psychology 04 frontiersin.org1972).Through this White racial lens (Feagin, 2020), Black people were placed at the bottom of a human hierarchy based on their "thick lips, ""flat noses, "and "wool-like hair, "among other physically discernible characteristics (Gossett, 1997).On a biological level, these racial distinctions were thought to control Black people's conduct and moral foundations (Jordan, 1974).This belief has persisted for centuries (Hall, 1997;Montagu, 1997;Brook, 1999).Biological determinism, still common today, classified Black males as childish, criminals, oversexualized, and more likely to commit offenses (Smedley, 1993;Smith, 2005).This belief held that these characteristics were inborn qualities that required physical punishment, subordination, and containment for the purpose of correction and the protection of society (Dean, 2000;Said, 2003).
United States society has a long history of sending distorted messages of low regard and mistruth to Black men and boys (e.g., Brinton, 1890;Watkins, 2006;Croteau and Hoynes, 2014).Although they change form over generations, these negative images of Black men and Blackness are consistently used for the same purpose over time-to justify Black males' symbolic and material exclusion from full participation within society (Ferguson, 2001;Johnson-Bailey, 2002;Bell, 2004).

Conclusion
This racialized exclusions of Black men and boys across important social venues in United States society through negative symbolic framing and enacted practices typically has profoundly negative, harmful implications for their lives and life chances (Shujaa, 1996;Lipman, 1998;Kunjufu, 2001;Sullivan and Cross, 2016).As a consistent consequence of the negative symbolic framing and enacted practices targeting Black men and boys, they regularly face challenges related to lower levels of educational attainment, higher rates of mental illness, higher rates of substance use disorders, higher rates of incarceration, and a host of other social problems (Moody, 2001;Waxman, 2021).
Given the role of symbolic and actual, or physically enacted, negative framing and practices (e.g., Guthrie, 2003) applied to Black men and boys (Haller, 1995;Holtzman, 2000), it is important to challenge these negative images and patterns of acting, interacting, and decision-making which together regularly work to symbolically, and physically, incarcerate them and limit their life chances (Hooks, 2004a;Williams et al., 2022).To create a more just and inclusive society where all people, regardless of race or ethnicity, gender, sexuality and more, experience inclusive, safe, and supportive contexts to foster and further the development of their full potential, it is important and necessary to interrupt the bad faith that connects the freedom-unfreedom paradox they consistently face across institutions (Grier, 2020;Brown, 2021).By exposing the bad faith that connects the symbolic and actual practices which consistently contain Black men and boys (Jackson, 2011), it becomes possible to identify possibilities for positive, transformative strategies and points of intervention required to foster the development of each person's fully humanity, potential and wellbeing (Hooks, 2000(Hooks, /2018;;Matthew, 2015;Wade, 2021).