Grading by AI Makes Me Feel Fairer? How Different Evaluators Affect College Students' Perception of Fairness
- 1Beijing Foreign Studies University, China
- 2Hubei University of Economics, China
In the field of education, the use of new technologies has significantly enhanced the objectivity and scientificity of educational evaluation. However, concerns have been raised about the fairness of evaluators, such as artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms.This research aimed to assess college students' perceptions of fairness in educational evaluation scenarios through three studies using experimental vignettes. The studies involved 172 participants in Study 1, 149 in Study 2, and 145 in Study 3. Study 1 found that different evaluators could significantly influence the fairness perception under three evaluation contexts. Students perceived AI algorithms as fairer than teachers.Study 2 revealed that information transparency was a mediator, indicating that students perceived higher fairness with AI algorithms due to increased transparency compared with teachers. Study 3 revealed that the explanation of evaluation outcomes moderated the effect of evaluator on students' perceived fairness. Specifically, when provided with explanations for evaluation results, the effect of evaluator on students' perceived fairness was lessened. In conclusion, this study emphasizes the importance of information transparency and comprehensive explanations in the evaluation process, which is more crucial than solely focusing on the type of evaluators. It also draws attention to potential risks like algorithmic hegemony and advocates for ethical considerations, including privacy regulations, in integrating new technologies into educational evaluation systems. Overall, this study provides valuable theoretical insights and practical guidance for conducting fairer educational evaluations in the era.
Keywords: Higher education evaluation, AI algorithm, fairness perception, Information transparency, explanation
Received: 15 May 2023;
Accepted: 18 Jan 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Chai, Ma, Wang, Zhu and Han. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Mx. Fangyuan Chai, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Haidian District, China
Mx. Jun Zhu, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Haidian District, China
Mx. Tingting Han, Hubei University of Economics, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China