Systematic Review ARTICLE
eHealth in treatment of offenders in forensic mental health: a review of the current state
- 1Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Netherlands
- 2Department of Research, Stichting Transfore, Netherlands
- 3Optentia, North West University, South Africa
Background: Treatment of offenders in forensic mental health is complex. Often, these in- or outpatients have low treatment motivation, suffer from multiple disorders, and have poor literacy skills. eHealth may be able to improve treatment outcomes because of its potential to increase motivation and engagement, and it can overcome the predominant one-size-fits-all approach by being tailored to individual patients.
Objective: In order to examine its potential, this systematic review studies the way that eHealth has been used and studied in forensic mental health and identifies accompanying advantages and disadvantages for both patients and treatment, including effectiveness.
Methods: A systematic search in Scopus, PsycINFO and Web of Science was performed up until December 2017. Studies were included if they focused on technological interventions to improve the treatment of forensic psychiatric patients.
Results: The search resulted in 50 studies in which eHealth was used for treatment purposes. Multiple types of studies and technologies were identified, such as virtual reality, web-based interventions and videoconferencing. The results confirmed the benefits of technology, for example the acquisition of unique information about offenders, effectiveness, and tailoring to specific characteristics, but indicated that these are not fully taken advantage of.
Discussion: To overcome the barriers and obtain the benefits, eHealth has to have a good fit with patients and the forensic psychiatric context. It has to be seamlessly integrated in existing care and should not be added as an isolated element. In order to bridge the gap between the current situation and eHealth’s potential, further research on development, implementation and evaluation should be conducted.
Keywords: eHealth, Interventions, offender/perpetrator, Forensic Psychiatry, Technology
Received: 19 Oct 2017;
Accepted: 31 Jan 2018.
Edited by:Katarina Howner, Karolinska Institute (KI), Sweden
Reviewed by:Nubia G. Lluberes, Baylor College of Medicine, United States
Natalie Durbeej, Karolinska Institute (KI), Sweden
Copyright: © 2018 Kip, Bouman, Kelders and van Gemert-Pijnen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Miss. Hanneke Kip, University of Twente, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, 7500 AE, Overijssel, Netherlands, firstname.lastname@example.org