@ARTICLE{10.3389/fpubh.2014.00073, AUTHOR={Tijsse-Klasen, Ellen and Koopmans, Marion P. G. and Sprong, Hein}, TITLE={Tick-Borne Pathogen – Reversed and Conventional Discovery of Disease}, JOURNAL={Frontiers in Public Health}, VOLUME={2}, YEAR={2014}, URL={https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00073}, DOI={10.3389/fpubh.2014.00073}, ISSN={2296-2565}, ABSTRACT={Molecular methods have increased the number of known microorganisms associated with ticks significantly. Some of these newly identified microorganisms are readily linked to human disease while others are yet unknown to cause human disease. The face of tick-borne disease discovery has changed with more diseases now being discovered in a “reversed way,” detecting disease cases only years after the tick-borne microorganism was first discovered. Compared to the conventional discovery of infectious diseases, reverse order discovery presents researchers with new challenges. Estimating public health risks of such agents is especially challenging, as case definitions and diagnostic procedures may initially be missing. We discuss the advantages and shortcomings of molecular methods, serology, and epidemiological studies that might be used to study some fundamental questions regarding newly identified tick-borne diseases. With increased tick-exposure and improved detection methods, more tick-borne microorganisms will be added to the list of pathogens causing disease in humans in the future.} }