%A D’Agostino McGowan,Lucy %A Stafford,Jewel D. %A Thompson,Vetta Lynn %A Johnson-Javois,Bethany %A Goodman,Melody S. %D 2015 %J Frontiers in Public Health %C %F %G English %K community based participatory research,Health Disparities,Community education,Public Health,Health Education %Q %R 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00179 %W %L %M %P %7 %8 2015-July-16 %9 Evaluation %+ Lucy D’Agostino McGowan,Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine,USA,ld.mcgowan@vanderbilt.edu %# %! Quantitative Evaluation of the Community Research Fellows Training Program %* %< %T Quantitative Evaluation of the Community Research Fellows Training Program %U https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2015.00179 %V 3 %0 JOURNAL ARTICLE %@ 2296-2565 %X ContextThe community research fellows training (CRFT) program is a community-based participatory research (CBPR) initiative for the St. Louis area. This 15-week program, based on a Master in Public Health curriculum, was implemented by the Division of Public Health Sciences at Washington University School of Medicine and the Siteman Cancer Center.ObjectivesWe measure the knowledge gained by participants and evaluate participant and faculty satisfaction of the CRFT program both in terms of meeting learning objectives and actively engaging the community in the research process.ParticipantsWe conducted analyses on 44 community members who participated in the CRFT program and completed the baseline and follow-up knowledge assessments.Main outcome measuresKnowledge gain is measured by a baseline and follow-up assessment given at the first and final session. Additionally, pre- and post-tests are given after the first 12 sessions. To measure satisfaction, program evaluations are completed by both the participants and faculty after each topic. Mid-way through the program, a mid-term evaluation was administered to assess the program’s community engagement. We analyzed the results from the assessments, pre- and post-tests, and evaluations.ResultsThe CRFT participants’ knowledge increased at follow-up as compared with baseline on average by a 16.5 point difference (p < 0.0001). Post-test scores were higher than pre-test scores for 11 of the 12 sessions. Both participants and faculty enjoyed the training and rated all session well.ConclusionThe CRFT program was successful in increasing community knowledge, participant satisfaction, and faculty satisfaction. This success has enhanced the infrastructure for CBPR as well as led to CBPR pilot projects that address health disparities in the St. Louis Greater Metropolitan Area.