Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health, 27 January 2023
Sec. Aging and Public Health
This article is part of the Research Topic Active and Healthy Aging and Quality of Life: Interventions and Outlook for the Future View all 53 articles

Factors influencing seniors' willingness to pay intention for exercise in the civil sports and recreation centers

  • Graduate Institute of Sport, Leisure and Hospitality Management, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan

Background: The increasing trend for an older population is a phenomenon that is well recognized around the world. The percentage of senior citizens participating in sports, recreation, and leisure activities is also increasing in order to sustain a healthier society. As long as seniors recognize the importance and benefits of keeping healthy, they would prefer to be active in various sports and fitness activities. The seniors could engage in making decisions about their own health by exercising regularly and by encouraging their similar-age peers. The civil sports and recreation centers (CSRCs) in Taiwan have adopted operating transfer (OT) and are located mainly in metropolitan areas, with programs consisting of indoor sports offering people daily exercise. The major aims of the CSRC are to keep the citizens in good health and not to be the city government's financial burden. The extant literature examines the determinants of general consumer behavior, neglecting studies on older adults. This study aims to explore the factors influencing seniors' willingness to pay (WTP) more for exercise in CSRCs outside of free hours.

Methods: This mixed-method study consists of quantitative and qualitative analyses. For the quantitative component, we invited five experts in the sports industry from the industry and academia to evaluate the validity of the questionnaire. A questionnaire consisting of motivation, exercise involvement, and constraint constructs in the quantitative method was administered to 193 older adults in CSRCs. The collected data were analyzed through descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and structural equation model (SEM).

Results: Empirical results indicate that WTP in groups of people aged 75–79, 70–74, and 65–69 years is higher than in the group of people aged 85 years and above. Exercise involvement and motivation had more of a positive impact on seniors' WTP.

Discussions: Developing a regular exercise habits and having social interaction in exercise courses drive female seniors to pay more for body health. The results of this study provide managers of CSRCs with decision-making recommendations: (1) initiate entry-level sports courses, such as quick chair exercise, to cultivate among seniors the habit of exercise; (2) motivate seniors to participate in sports with other seniors in order to enhance their social activity and raise their WTP more for sports consumption outside of free scheduled periods; and (3) recruit seniors as exercise coaches or personal trainers to pass their experiences with other people of their age. In addition to expanding seniors' social connections, it encourages peers to exercise. Managerial implications and future research are also discussed.

Conclusion: This study contributes to exploring the determinants of seniors' WTP intention. Motivation and exercise involvement had a significantly positive impact on seniors' WTP intention.

Introduction

The World Health Organization (1) indicated that the number of people aged 60 years and above was 1 billion in 2019 and this number will increase to 1.4 billion by 2030 and 2.1 billion by 2050. The increasing trend for an older population is a phenomenon that is well recognized around the world. Senior adults are the most inactive sector of the U.S. population (2). The research claimed that senior adults may possibly face more constraints on physical activity (PA), such as lack of time, interest, fear of falling, and injuries (3). This is mainly due to the chronic diseases associated with age, most particularly, physical disability and discomfort leading to health constraints. Senior adults of low socioeconomic status (4), women (3), and those with less disposable income (5) are at greater risk of physical inactivity. Senior adults also report constraints that are more perceptual in nature, including lack of time, lack of motivation, misconceptions about PA, fear of injury, and lack of skill (6). As of 2017, an estimated 962 million people aged 60 years or above comprise 13% of the global population. The population of people aged 60 years and above is growing at a rate of about 3% per year. According to definitions from the World Health Organization, when the proportion of society that is elderly (over 65 years old) reaches 7%, it is called an “aged society,” while 14% is an “old-age society.” If this figure is 20% or more, it is a “super-aged society” (7). According to the Ministry of the Interior, the ratio of the elderly population in Taiwan exceeded 14% in 2018, and it became an aged society. The elderly population in Taiwan has accelerated. As of January 2021, Taiwan's elderly population (over 65 years old) accounted for 16.2% of the total population, officially making it an old-age society (8).

The percentage of senior citizens participating in sports, recreation, and leisure activities is increasing (9, 10). Consumers aged 60 years and over actively participate in a variety of sports and fitness activities because they acknowledge the importance and benefits of keeping fit and healthy (11). Shank (12) revealed that participation in sports for people in sports facilities, in particular, is closely associated with the lifestyle preferences and personalities of consumers. It is, therefore, important and necessary to understand senior adult consumers' exercise consumption habits. Currently, there are several exercise activities and courses offered at the civil sports and recreation centers (CSRCs) in Taiwan. Taiwan's CSRCs were built using the city government's funding and then were operated and transferred (OT) to private firms within the contracted years in order to make their operating performance better and generate revenue for the local authority. Taiwan's CSRCs have two major objectives of revenue generation and exercise participation increase because of the OT management type (13). Hence, the major aims of the CSRC are to keep the citizens in good health and not to be a local authority's financial burden. Meanwhile, to increase the percentage of senior citizens participating in PA, the CSRCs in Taiwan have been regulated to offer the following free welfare hour zone for people aged 65 years and above (hereafter, seniors): (1) 8:00–10:00 a.m. for the major sports facilities (excluding basketball, squash, and roller blades) during the whole week; and (2) 2:00–4:00 p.m. from Monday to Friday (only for swimming pool and gym). All free welfare hour zones exclude public holidays and summer and winter breaks. Outside these free welfare hour zones, seniors can buy a discounted ticket—NT$50 (US$1 = NT$28) for the swimming pool (normal ticket price is NT$110) and NT$25/h for the gym (normal ticket price is NT$50/h). However, there were limited senior participants to purchase these discounted tickets leading to the fact that the CSRCs could not generate revenue from the seniors and the seniors would not be interested in extending their exercise time.

There are limited studies on the physical and psychological needs of senior customers. However, ticket sales outside of these free welfare hours are not as good as the other operating periods. Even though the CSRCs are required to offer free welfare hour zones for people aged 65 years or above, few seniors experience PA in the CSRCs in Taiwan. In contrast, the CSRCs also observed that some seniors prefer to enjoy non-crowded PA during non-free welfare hours rather than experiencing PA during free welfare hours. In particular, some seniors do not like the feeling of being looked down upon during free welfare hours. Some CSRCs have attempted to initiate marketing campaigns, such as offering promotional packages that extend discounted periods for seniors and launching a PA course only for seniors.

Willingness to pay (WTP) is consumers' perceived value of products or services, usually expressed in their local currency (14). WTP usually consists of whether or not and how much a consumer is willing to pay for something (15). In economics, WTP is regarded as a contingent valuation that represents the maximum cost that a consumer is willing to pay for an item and shows the value of that item to the consumer (15, 16). However, Pulido-Fernández and López-Sánchez (17) asserted that there is still no appropriate statistical model to estimate WTP. Wertenbroch and Skiera (18) pointed out that consumers' WTP assesses the demand for public and private goods to plan an optimal price model. Previous studies have found that many research methods can assess the price of a consumer's different conditions. Lee and Heo (16) suggested that the value of products or services can be used to assess the benefits or costs of environmental resources. Namkung and Jang (19) used one item (“How much more are you willing to pay for green practices at the restaurant?”) to measure consumers' WTP more for green practices in restaurants. Yooyen and Leerattanakorn (20) asked the respondents to choose the amount or percentage that they were willing to pay from a list of possible payments. Table 1 shows the most important literature on WTP.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Major related extant research on WTP.

There is no consensus among researchers about the best measurement for WTP (17). According to the results of Table 1, the survey questionnaire to estimate WTP more might be appropriate based on the previous studies (17, 19).

Exercise has been linked to improved physical health (24, 25). For senior adults, especially, exercise has been linked to better breathing, muscle strength, flexibility, and balance, less susceptibility to falls, and improved executive control processes (2631). Motivation is defined as promoting and continuing activity programs in both the intensity and direction of the effort (32). People are motivated to exercise for personal goals and social interaction (3335). Beaton et al. (36) claimed that sports involvement is present when individuals evaluate their participation in a sports activity that brings hedonic and symbolic value to their life. Studies conducted in recreational settings have shown that individuals who are more involved in an activity are more likely to remain customers (37, 38). Kyle et al. (39) noticed that the patterns of leisure involvement also depend on the nature of the activity and the participant's characteristics. Among senior people with a broad range of body mass indices, poor health and lack of interest are usually mentioned as constraints on PA (4044). Many senior people also have a fear of falling and injury and feel insecure when exercising outdoors (4548). Less is known about the perceived constraints on PA among obese senior people. No studies have examined whether or not perceived constraints can explain the increased risk of physical inactivity among obese senior people. Constraint captures the explanations for physical inactivity, which can be internal or external, intrapersonal or interpersonal, intervening or antecedent, blocking or inhibiting, and permanent or temporary (49). Based on the literature, this article has established three hypotheses, namely, (1) motivation for exercise positively affected WTP; (2) exercise involvement positively affected WTP; and (3) constraints negatively affected WTP. Our aim of this article is to examine the relationships among motivations, exercise involvement, constraints, and WTP in order to gain insights that will result in effective services to senior adult consumers in a sports and fitness center. This article is the first to discuss the factors influencing senior citizens' exercise consumption habits using WTP.

Materials and methods

Research method

This study is based on the concept of WTP, aiming to explore the factors influencing senior citizens' WTP more for exercise in the CSRCs outside of free hours. Pulido-Fernández and López-Sánchez (17) claimed that parametric methods are most used, but non-parametric approaches have some advantages with respect to the parametric analysis since the WTP estimators are easily assessed and are more robust to misspecifications of the probability distribution function. The structural equation model (SEM) has a few advantages over multiple regression and path analysis (50). Wertenbroch and Skiera (18) argued that the external validity of contingent valuation and related approaches may be limited. They provide less incentive to consumers to truthfully reveal their WTP because responses are hypothetical. Pulido-Fernández and López-Sánchez (17) asserted that there is still no standard about which is the appropriate statistical model to estimate the WTP. Hence, this article adopted the survey questionnaire to estimate WTP more from the study of Namkung and Jang (19).

Sample design and data collection

In order to ensure the respondents who have visited a CSRC in Taiwan and whose age is above 65 years, this article adopted purposive sampling and the researchers waited for visitors beside the entrances of CSRCs during the free welfare time zones for seniors (8:00–10:00 a.m. during the whole week, and 2:00–4:00 p.m. from Monday to Friday). We provided both paper-based and mobile-based (with a QR code) questionnaires for participants. We collected 193 valid on-site questionnaires from the CSRCs. The last part of the demographic section of the questionnaire screened out invalid respondents. The valid collected data were analyzed using SEM.

Measurement

This study adopted the mixed-method study including quantitative and qualitative analyses. After developing the questions from the well-established literature and then translating them into Mandarin Chinese to ensure participants' full comprehension, the first stage of this study invited five experts from the industry and academic fields in the sports industry to examine the validity of the questionnaire. The quantitative method in the second stage gathered data through the questionnaire. The questionnaire survey consisted of six sections: the first section introduced the purpose of this scale and informed participants that individual responses would be kept highly confidential and anonymous. The first section asked respondents to fill in their real feeling. The second section assessed a motivation construct made up of 15 items (Cronbach's α = 0.944). Examples of items include “Maintain physical health and physiological functions.” and “Keep pace with social trends;” an exercise involvement construct made up of 13 items (Cronbach's α = 0.950). Examples of items include “PA is very important to me;” and constraints made up of 13 items (Cronbach's α = 0.894). Examples of items include “I am more introverted” and “I never did PA before.” The participants were asked to provide their level of agreement to disagreement with the related statements, adopting a 5-point Likert scale from 1 for “highly disagree” to 5 for “highly agree.” This article puts all questionnaire items in Table 2.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Major related extant research on WTP.

Namkung and Jang (19) examined customers' WTP more for green practices in restaurants using hypothetical scenarios. Namkung and Jang (19) used one item (“How much more are you willing to pay for green practices at the restaurant?”) to measure consumers' WTP. This study adopts this previously validated questionnaire item from the study of Namkung and Jang (19). The third section addressed demographic variables and measured WTP using a Likert instrument (How much will you pay for exercise outside of the free welfare hours? 1: NT$0; 2: NT$1–5; 3: NT$6–10; 4: NT$11–15; 5: NT$16–20; 6: NT$21–25; 7: NT$26–30; 8: NT$31–35; 9: NT$36–40; 10: NT$41–45; 11: NT$46–50; 12: NT$51 and above; (US$1 = NT$28).

Measurement model

This article used the purposive sampling method to collect on-site data from participants in 12 CSRCs over an 8-week period during the free welfare time zones for seniors (8:00–10:00 a.m. and 2:00–4:00 p.m.) in Taipei City.

One of the demographic questionnaire items asked respondents about their age range. If the respondent's answer was below 65 years old, their questionnaire would not be included in the further analysis. A total of 210 questionnaires were distributed, and a total of 193 valid samples were collected for analysis.

We examined the insignificant difference in WTP more between women and men using the t-test. We further examined the relationship between age group and WTP more using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the post-hoc Dunnett T3 test. This study further assessed the reliability, validity, and Spearman's correlation through SPSS version 26.0. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and path analysis were undertaken with the IBM AMOS 26 Graphics.

Results

Descriptive statistics

Table 3 lists the descriptive statistics of the participant data. Of the 193 valid samples, 104 (53.9%) are men; 89 (46.1%) are women. A total of 56 (29%) respondents are aged 65–69 years; 52 (27%) respondents are aged 70–74 years; 28 (14.5%) respondents are aged 75–79 years; 43 (22.3%) respondents are aged 80–84 years; and there are 14 (7.3%) respondents above 85 years old.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Demographics of the selected participants.

We examined the insignificant difference in WTP more between women and men using the t-test. We further examined the relationship between age group and WTP more using one-way ANOVA. The Levene homogenous variance test value is 9.71 (p-value < 0.0001), indicating that the hypothesis of homogenous variance of WTP more is rejected. The post-hoc Dunnett T3 test with heterogeneous variance (Table 4) shows that WTP more in the groups of people aged 75–79, 70–74, and 65–69 years is higher than in the group of people aged 85 years and above. However, the WTP more of the group of people aged 80–84 years is only insignificantly higher than that of people in the group aged 85 years and above.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. WTP more comparison among five age groups.

Since WTP more in the groups of participants aged 75–79, 70–74, and 65–69 years is higher than in the group of participants aged 85 years and above, the CSRC could motivate seniors aged 65–79 years, particularly for the 75–79 years age group, who are most willing to pay more, to experience sports with marketing promotions in order to raise their WTP for sports consumption outside of free welfare hours.

The average WTP more among people aged 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, 80–84, and 85 years and above is 8.52 (NT$31–40), 9.23 (NT$36–45), 10.36 (NT$41–50), 7.65 (NT$26–35), and 4.14 (NT$11–20), respectively. These empirical results indicated that the maximum average WTP more among different age groups is < NT$50.

Reliability and validity

This study further assessed convergent validity and discriminant validity of all constructs through factor loadings, composite reliability (CR), and average variance extracted (AVE) in Table 2. All CR values show a greater degree of reliability than the recommended cutoff value of 0.70 and AVEs are >0.40, respectively (51).

Bivariate correlations

Existing research has used the Spearman correlation analysis to indicate the associations between variables before SEM (50, 52). This article also used the Spearman correlation analysis to indicate significant links between research variables. This is illustrated in Table 5, which shows that motivation and exercise involvement are significantly positively related to WTP more. Constraints for exercise are insignificantly negatively related to WTP more.

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Bivariate correlations between research variables and descriptive statistics.

Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling

CFA validation

Confirmatory factor analysis is the first stage of the SEM that validates the goodness-of-fit of our model. The examination of the measurement model of the scales and the assessment of the path analysis were undertaken with the IBM AMOS 26 Graphics. The main criteria used to judge model fit, such as Bentler's (53) Comparative Fit Index (CFI) and Normal Fit Index (NFI), for which values >0.85 validate a good model fit (54), and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), with a value of < 0.1 considered acceptable (55), are shown in Table 6. If the model does not fit well, modification indices (MIs) for the lambda matrix might be used to improve it (56).

TABLE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6. CFA for each construct and the research model.

Table 6 shows that both each construct and the whole model achieve goodness-of-fit by eliminating unfit items through MI improvement (56). However, Shook et al. (57) advise that the Bollen–Stine bootstrapping approach can be used to adjust the model fit if the data cannot fulfill normal distribution. In particular, Thode (58) recommends the Shapiro–Wilk test as the best choice for normality testing of the dependent variable. This article used the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test with the Lilliefors correction and Shapiro–Wilk statistics for a normality test (57, 59). The p-values for these two normality tests are < 0.001, indicating that the data do not seem to fit a normal distribution. Hence, this article further used the Bollen–Stine bootstrapping method to modify the fitness indices.

Path analysis from the SEM model

The results of the SEM [χ2(115) = 315.85, p < 0.0001; NFI = 0.824; CFI = 0.879; RMSEA = 0.095] are shown in Table 7. However, due to the non-normal data in SEM, Shook et al. (57) suggest using the Bollen–Stine bootstrapping approach to adjust the model fit. The model fit indices in this study achieved a reasonable fit (51, 60) after Bollen–Stine bootstrapping, as shown in Table 7.

TABLE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Table 7. Suggested goodness-of-fit statistics and acceptable cutoff criteria.

Table 8 indicates that motivation (β = 0.11**) has a significantly positive impact on WTP, supporting Hypothesis 1. Exercise involvement (β = 0.20***) has a significantly positive impact on WTP, supporting Hypothesis 2. In contrast, constraints have an insignificant effect on WTP, which does not support Hypothesis 3. Meanwhile, the coefficient of exercise involvement is larger than the coefficient of motivation, indicating that exercise involvement has a more positive impact on WTP.

TABLE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Table 8. The result of SEM and hypothesis.

Discussion

The findings of this article shed light on seniors' WTP processes in order to help develop effective marketing and exercise involvement strategies that drive future economic valuation decisions. Examining the relationship between age and WTP in Table 4, the post-hoc Dunnett T3 test shows that WTP among people aged 75–79, 70–74, and 65–69 years is higher than among people aged 85 years and older. However, the WTP of people aged 80–84 years is insignificantly higher than that of people aged 85 years and older. Hence, CSRCs could offer exercise courses for seniors aged 65–79 years, particularly for those aged 75–79 years, who are most willing to pay more, to create a win–win situation: one for the healthier seniors and the other for the wealthier CSRC.

The first aim of this study was to identify the determinants that could drive senior adults to participate in PA in the CSRC outside of the free welfare time zone. According to the empirical results, exercise involvement and motivation could drive seniors' WTP to do so. As for the second objective, this article examined whether motivation, exercise involvement, or constraints could inspire, or discourage senior adults to join PA in the CSRC. The empirical results suggest that both exercise involvement and motivation could have a positive impact on seniors' WTP; meanwhile, exercise involvement has a more significant effect on WTP. As long as the seniors recognized the importance and benefits of keeping healthy, they preferred to be active in various sports and fitness activities. This result is consistent with work from previous studies (61). Important preventative exercise has been linked to improved physical health (24, 25). Once a senior has regular exercise habit, they intend to pay more in order to maintain their health.

Meanwhile, seniors like to chat with their peers. One interesting topic is exercise. Buman et al. (61) indicated that social interaction is a crucial element in driving senior consumers to exercise involvement. The CSRC is a public area where everyone can not only perform some exercise but also connect with one another. If they are already used to doing regular exercise, they would spend more time on exercise or socializing outside of the free welfare hours, and will, therefore, pay more. According to our empirical findings, seniors would prefer to link with cutting-edge technology in modern society, such as social media chatting and wearable devices, while pursuing PA in the CSRC. Hence, launching advanced technology integrated with the exercise course would be a specific marketing strategy for the CSRC.

High body mass indices, poor health, and lack of interest are usually mentioned as constraints on PA (42, 45). However, this empirical result proves that as long as senior adults can develop their regular exercises, they are willing to pay more and exercise more often.

This article has several limitations. The first is the sample size. Due to the exploratory nature of this empirical work, our sample size was small because the participants had to be at least 65 years old. A second limitation is a generalizability. This article investigated only an empirical study in the CSRC in Taipei City. Thus, it may not be possible to generalize the findings to other private gyms and other sports and fitness facilities. The third limitation is convenience sampling, which excluded seniors who would not go to the CSRCs.

Wilson et al. (62) indicated that exercise could offer benefits in combating disease and improving the quality of life. Deci and Ryan (63) proposed the self-determination theory (SDT) and indicated that exercise can fulfill people's psychological needs, including competence (effectively facing and conquering challenging goals), autonomy (having a sense of ownership), and relatedness (keeping a close social connection with others). Our empirical study validates that exercise involvement (autonomy) and motivation (competence and relatedness) have a positive effect on WTP intention. These findings are also consistent with the theoretical perspective of SDT.

In this context, one of the strongest agreements in the motivation construct is “I could guide others.” This finding means that the seniors thought that they could pass their experiences onto similar-age or younger generations and by doing so, they help them strengthen their capacities and would obtain recognition from others (64). Hence, CSRCs in Taiwan could benchmark the practice of private gyms in other countries to recruit seniors as exercise coaches. Besides cultivating a patient, older coach, seniors would gain the peer learning effect that would provide more intention to experience exercise. The main policy implication of this study would be the promotion of regular exercise activities for seniors and the launching of exercise marketing campaigns in the community, linked to the local CSRC. Programs that promote social participation among seniors claim welfare in participants' happiness and a decrease in anxiety as well as depression levels (65, 66). The results of this study provide managers of CSRCs with the following decision-making recommendations: (1) initiate entry-level sports courses to cultivate in seniors the habit of exercise; (2) motivate seniors to participate in sports with marketing promotions in order to raise their WTP for sports consumption outside of free welfare hours; and (3) recruit seniors as exercise coaches or personal trainers to pass their experiences onto similar-age generations. In addition, the CSRCs could initiate resistance training, Tai Chi, and Eight Brocades exercise classes for seniors because these exercises have improved the pressure swing center and the stability limit for seniors (6769).

Conclusion

Willingness to pay in people aged 75–79, 70–74, and 65–69 years is higher than in those 85 years and above. CSRCs could offer exercise courses for seniors whose age is 65–79 years, particularly for those aged 75–79 years, who have the highest mean WTP more. Taking this paid course creates a win–win situation for healthier seniors and wealthier CSRC. The empirical results revealed that motivation and exercise involvement had a significantly positive impact on WTP intention, supporting hypotheses 1 and 2 through SEM. Future researchers could collaborate with colleagues in other countries to expand the sample size and sampling method and proceed with a cross-country study.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

This study is extended from the project of sports centers (MOST 105-2410-H-003-048). This project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee, National Taiwan Normal University (REC Number: 201603HS010).

Author contributions

C-YF contributed to conceptualization, literature review, methodology, software, and writing. P-YC contributed to literature review and data collection. YL contributed to writing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

The funding sources are from Taiwan's Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 110-2410-H-003-114 and MOST 109-2622-H-003-003) and National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. World Health Organization. Ageing. Geneva: World Health Organization (2022). Available online at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/ageing#tab=tab_1 (accessed July 10, 2022).

Google Scholar

2. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2008) 40:181–8. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a51b3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Baceviciene M, Alisauskas J. Perceived constraints on exercise in the group of the elderly: a pilot study. Open Med. (2013) 8:689–95. doi: 10.2478/s11536-013-0184-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Clark CO. Identifying psychological, physiological, and environmental barriers and facilitators to exercise among older low income adults. J Clin Geropsychol. (1999) 5:51–62.

Google Scholar

5. Shephard RJ. Determinants of exercise in people aged 65 years and older. In:Dishman RK, , editor. Advances in Exercise Adherence. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics (1994). p. 343–60.

Google Scholar

6. Brawley LR, Rejeski WJ, King AC. Promoting physical activity for older adults: the challenges for changing behavior. Am J Prevent Med. (2003) 25:172–83. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(03)00182-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. United Nations,. Ageing. New York, NY: United Nations (2018). Available online at: http://www.un.org/en/sections/issues-depth/ageing (accessed June 30, 2022).

Google Scholar

8. Ministry of the Interior. Ageing. Taiwan: Ministry of the Interior (2021). Available online at: https://www.stat.gov.tw/public/Data/132162358VPAVQ8D.pdf (accessed July 1, 2022).

Google Scholar

9. Elling A, Knoppers A, De Knop P. The social integrating meaning of sport: a critical and comparative analysis of policy and practice in the Netherlands. Sociol Sport. (2001) 18:414–34. doi: 10.1123/ssj.18.4.414

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Vonck E, Verte D, De Donder L, Buffel T, De Witte N, Dury S. Older people and sport: looking beyond the health perspective. Int J Soc Sci Hum Stud. (2010) 2:9–16. Available online at: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijsshs/issue/26223/276219

Google Scholar

11. Li L. People can live longer by having more physical activity. J Sport Health Sci. (2012) 1:7–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2012.02.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Shank MD. Sport Marketing: A Strategic Perspective. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall (2009).

Google Scholar

13. Fang CYF. Perspective of local government on the performance assessment of district sports and leisure centers. Sustainability. (2020) 12:9094. doi: 10.3390/su12219094

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Wertenbroch K, Soman D, Chattopadhyay A. On the perceived value of money: the reference dependence of currency numerosity effects. J Consum Res. (2007) 34:1–10. doi: 10.1086/513041

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Olsen JA, Smith RD. Theory vs. practice: a review of ‘willingness-to-pay' in health and health care. Health Econ. (2001) 10:39–52. doi: 10.1002/1099-1050(200101)10:1<39::AID-HEC563>3.0.CO;2-E

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Lee CY, Heo H. Estimating willingness to pay for renewable energy in South Korea using the contingent valuation method. Energy Policy. (2016) 94:150–6. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.051

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Pulido-Fernández JI, López-Sánchez Y. Are tourists really willing to pay more for sustainable destinations? Sustainability. (2016) 8:1240. doi: 10.3390/su8121240

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Wertenbroch K, Skiera B. Measuring consumers' willingness to pay at the point of purchase. J Mark Res. (2002) 39:228–41. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.39.2.228.19086

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Namkung Y, Jang S. Are consumers willing to pay more for green practices at restaurants? J Hosp Tour Res. (2017) 41:329–56. doi: 10.1177/1096348014525632

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Yooyen A, Leerattanakorn N. Discovering niche market: consumer preferences and willingness to pay for organic pork. Chin Bus Rev. (2012) 11:251–64. doi: 10.17265/1537-1506/2012.03.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Hu HH, Parsa HG, Self J. The dynamics of green restaurant patronage. Cornell Hosp Quart. (2010) 51:344–62. doi: 10.1177/1938965510370564

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Ha-Brookshire JE, Norum PS. Willingness to pay for socially responsible products: case of cotton apparel. J Consum Mark. (2011) 28:344–53. doi: 10.1108/07363761111149992

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Becker GM, DeGroot MH, Marschak J. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behav Sci. (1964) 9:226–32.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

24. Emery CF, Gatz M. Psychological and cognitive effects of an exercise program for community-residing older adults. Gerontologist. (1990) 30:184–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

25. Hillman CH, Erickson KI, Kramer AF. Be smart, exercise your heart: exercise effects on brain and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2008) 9:58–65. doi: 10.1038/nrn2298

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Colcombe S, Kramer AF. Fitness effects on the cognitive function of older adults: a meta-analytic study. Psychol Sci. (2003) 14:125–30. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01430

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Howe TE, Rochester L, Neil F, Skelton DA, Ballinger C. Exercise for improving balance in older people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2011) 11:CD004963. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004963.pub3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Liu CJ, Latham NK. Progressive resistance strength training for improving physical function in older adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2009) 3:CD002759. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002759.pub2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Sherrington C, Tiedemann A, Fairhall N, Close JC, Lord SR. Exercise to prevent falls in older adults: an updated meta-analysis and best practice recommendations. N S W Public Health Bull. (2011) 22:78–83. doi: 10.1071/NB10056

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Whitehead BR, Blaxton JM. Daily well-being benefits of physical activity in older adults: does time or type matter? Gerontologist. (2017) 57:1062–71. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw250

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2014: With Special Feature on Adults Aged 55–64. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics (2015).

Google Scholar

32. Kilpatrick M, Hebert E, Jacobsen D. Physical activity motivation: a practitioner's guide to self-determination theory. J Phys Educ Recreat Dance. (2002) 73:36–41. doi: 10.1080/07303084.2002.10607789

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Dacey M, Baltzell A, Zaichkowsky L. Older adults' intrinsic and extrinsic motivation toward physical activity. Am J Health Behav. (2008) 32:570–82. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.32.6.2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Eyler AA, Baker E, Cromer L, King AC, Brownson RC, Donatelle RJ. Physical activity and minority women: a qualitative study. Health Educ Behav. (1998) 25:640–52.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

35. Wolinsky FD, Stump TE, Clark DO. Antecedents and consequences of physical activity and exercise among older adults. Gerontologist. (1995) 35:451–62.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

36. Beaton AA, Funk DC, Ridinger L, Jordan J. Sport involvement: a conceptual and empirical analysis. Sport Manag Rev. (2011) 14:126–40. doi: 10.1016/j.smr.2010.07.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Havitz ME, Dimanche F. Leisure involvement revisited: conceptual conundrums and measurement advances. J Leis Res. (1997) 29:245–78.

Google Scholar

38. Iwasaki Y, Havitz ME. Examining relationships between leisure involvement, psychological commitment, and loyalty to a recreational agency. J Leis Res. (2004) 36:45–72. doi: 10.1080/00222216.2004.11950010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Kyle GT, Graefe AR, Manning RE, Bacon J. Predictors of behavioral loyalty among hikers along the Appalachian Trail. Leis Sci. (2004) 26:99–118. doi: 10.1080/01490400490272675

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Kyle GT, Graefe AR, Manning RE, Bacon J. An examination of the relationship between leisure activity involvement and place attachment among hikers along the Appalachian Trail. J Leis Res. (2003) 35:249–73. doi: 10.1080/00222216.2003.11949993

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Booth ML, Bauman A, Owen N. Perceived barriers to physical activity among older Australians. J Aging Phys Act. (2002) 10:271–80. doi: 10.1123/japa.10.3.271

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Newson RS, Kemps EB. Factors that promote and prevent exercise engagement in older adults. J Aging Health. (2007) 19:470–81. doi: 10.1177/0898264307300169

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Cohen-Mansfield J, Marx MS, Guralnik JM. Motivators and barriers to exercise in an older community-dwelling population. J Aging Phys Act. (2003) 11:242–53. doi: 10.1123/japa.11.2.242

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Hirvensalo M, Lampinen P, Rantanen T. Physical exercise in old age: an eight year follow-up study on involvement, motives, and obstacles among persons' age 65–84. J Aging Phys Act. (1998) 6:157–68.

Google Scholar

45. Rasinaho M, Hirvensalo M, Leinonen R, Lintunen T, Rantanen T. Motives for and barriers to physical activity among older adults with mobility limitations. J Aging Phys Act. (2007) 15:90–102. doi: 10.1123/japa.15.1.90

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Booth ML, Bauman A, Owen N, Gore CJ. Physical activity preferences, preferred sources of assistance, and perceived barriers to increased activity among physically inactive Australians. Prevent Med. (1997) 26:131–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

47. Howland J, Lachman ME, Peterson EW, Cote J, Kasten L, Jette A. Covariates of fear of falling and associated activity curtailment. Gerontologist. (1998) 38:549–55.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

48. Wijlhuizen GJ, de Jong R, Hopman-Rock M. Older persons afraid of falling reduce physical activity to prevent outdoor falls. Prevent Med. (2007) 44:260–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.11.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Brawley LR, Martin KA, Gyurcsik NC. Problems in assessing perceived barriers in exercise: confusing obstacles with attributions and excuses. In: Duda JL, editor. Advancements in Sport and Exercise Psychology Measurement. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology (1998), pp. 337–50.

Google Scholar

50. Musil CM, Jones SL, Warner CD. Structural equation modeling and its relationship to multiple regression and factor analysis. Res Nurs Health. (1998) 21:271–81.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

51. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis. New York, NY: Pearson Higher Ed (2013).

Google Scholar

52. Montoro L, Useche S, Alonso F, Cendales B. Work environment, stress, and driving anger: a structural equation model for predicting traffic sanctions of public transport drivers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2018) 15:497. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030497

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. (1990) 107:238.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

54. Widaman K. Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait–multimethod data. Appl Psychol Measur. (1985) 9:1–26.

Google Scholar

55. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In:Bollen KA, Long JS, , editors. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage (1993). doi: 10.1177/0049124192021002005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Hinkin TR, Tracey JB, Enz CA. Scale construction: developing reliable and valid measurement instruments. J Hosp Tour Res. (1997) 21:100–20.

Google Scholar

57. Shook CL, Ketchen DJ, Hult GTM, Kacmar KM. An assessment of the use of structural equation modeling in strategic management research. Strat Manag J. (2004) 25:397–404. doi: 10.1002/smj.385

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Thode HJ. Testing for Normality. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker (2002). doi: 10.1201/9780203910894

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Ghasemi A, Zahediasl S. Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. Int J Endocrinol Metabol. (2012) 10:486. doi: 10.5812/ijem.3505

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Kline R. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press (2005).

Google Scholar

61. Buman MP, Yasova LD, Giacobbi PR. Descriptive and narrative reports of barriers and motivators to physical activity in sedentary older adults. Psychol Sport Exerc. (2010) 11:223–30. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.02.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Wilson PM, Mack DE, Grattan KP. Understanding motivation for exercise: a self-determination theory perspective. Can Psychol. (2008) 49:250–6. doi: 10.1037/a0012762

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory: a macro theory of human motivation, development, and health. Can Psychol. (2008) 49:182. doi: 10.1037/a0012801

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. World Health Organization. Population Aging. Geneva: World Health Organization (2019). Available online at: https://www.who.int/features/qa/72/en/ (accessed July 1, 2022).

Google Scholar

65. Courtin E, Knapp M. Social isolation, loneliness and health in old age: a scoping review. Health Soc Care Commun. (2017) 25:799–812. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12311

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Aguilera-Hermida AP, Anderson EA, Negrón VA. Intergenerational activities that promote engaging conversations are preferred among young and older adults. J Intergen Relat. (2020) 18:71–87. doi: 10.1080/15350770.2019.1608346

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Li ZS, Chiu WH, Chen YY. The influence of exercise interventions on balance and gait in older adults: a systematic review. Quart Chin Phys Educ. (2022) 36:137–54. doi: 10.6223/qcpe.202206_36(2).0004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Chen CN, Chien KY, Chen SC. Resistance training for the middle-aged and older adults: effects of movement velocity. Quart Chin Phys Educ. (2021) 35:145–58. doi: 10.6223/qcpe.202109_35(3).0002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Chang CH, Chow HW. Comparison of the senior functional fitness test in different countries. Quart Chin Phys Educ. (2020) 34:205–16. doi: 10.1155/2020/8690540

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: civil sports and recreation centers (CSRC), WTP more, exercise involvement, motivation, constraint

Citation: Fang C-Y, Chen P-Y and Liao Y (2023) Factors influencing seniors' willingness to pay intention for exercise in the civil sports and recreation centers. Front. Public Health 10:992500. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.992500

Received: 12 July 2022; Accepted: 23 December 2022;
Published: 27 January 2023.

Edited by:

Roy Rillera Marzo, Management and Science University, Malaysia

Reviewed by:

Tianou Zhang, University of Texas at San Antonio, United States
Mao Chou Hsu, Tajen University, Taiwan

Copyright © 2023 Fang, Chen and Liao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Chin-Yi Fang, yes fred@ntnu.edu.tw; yes chinyifang@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.