Health behaviors and problems in Polish homeless men

Introduction Homelessness is considered to be a global problem, independent of the material situation of a given country and occurring in most societies around the world. Aim of the study Assessment of the preferred health behaviors of homeless people. Materials and methods The study covered 153 men who are homeless and 312 men who are not homeless. The original questionnaire of homeless, and validated the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), the Health Behavior Inventory (HBI), the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) and the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scale were used. The research covered fully completed questionnaires from 153 homeless men staying in Białystok and Gdańsk homelss centers. Results On average, the homeless men assessed their health at 6.0 ± 2.7 points, and the non-homeless at 7.8 ± 2.2 points (p < 0.001). Significant differences were found between people experiencing a homelessness crisis and the control group in selected aspects concerning the everyday life hygiene of the respondents, health self-assessment, declarations of visits to a specialist and carrying out check-ups, level of satisfaction with life, coping with difficult situations, preferred pro-health behaviors and dimensions of health control. In the used scales, SWLS, HBI, GES, and MHCL, the majority of homeless men obtained average scores. They were rather dissatisfied with their lives, with a low level of effectiveness in coping with difficult situations and obstacles, a low level of health behaviors, and in the scope of health, control increasing the impact of chance. Conclusion The level of the presented health behaviors showed statistically significant diversification with all dimensions of the health locus of control, and its internal dimension with age, homelessness phase, the respondents’ criminal history, being under constant medical care, and self-assessment of health.


Introduction
Homelessness is considered to be a global problem, independent of the material situation of a given country and occurring in most societies around the world.The population of homeless people is internally very diversified, although it is possible to observe in it some life situations typical for this group, most often of a social, economic, psychological, legal or health nature (1).However, the literature on the subject lacks a consensus as to the exact definition of homelessness and a consensus as to whether people living in conditions described as 'homeless' consider themselves as such (2).In general, homelessness is defined as 'the state of a lack of a home' (3), which does not reflect the actual scope of the problem.Homelessness is living without a home and the inability to satisfy basic needs.Therefore, the definition of homelessness should not exclude people living in inadequate housing conditions or temporary accommodation.The UN report, after Brannon (4), distinguishes the following types of homelessness: rough sleeping (sleeping on the street, under a bridge, or in a public place-temporary, seasonal, short-or long-term); living on the sidewalk (use of the 'pitch' and shelter under cardboard, fabric or plastic-short-or medium-term); squatting (regularly staying in the same abandoned building for a short or medium period); living in poor, often unsafe accommodation (on boats or other floating platforms without protection or services, which do not pass all adequacy tests-longterm or permanent) and refugee camps (life without the possibility of returning home-long-term or permanent).Based on ETHEOS 2008, the Polish Typology of Homelessness was developed (5,6); it distinguishes rooflessness (living without a roof over their head in public spaces), houselessness (staying in facilities for the homeless, in shelters, temporary and transitional accommodation, medical and penitentiary institutions without a residential address); unsecured accommodation (living in unsecured/insecure accommodation temporarily with family/friends); inappropriate/inadequate accommodation (living in temporary/unconventional, fragile constructions/structures -mobile homes, unconventional buildings, temporary structures).
Nearly 155 million people are thought to be homeless and stay in temporary shelters, refugee camps, and other transitional conditions, with another billion living without adequate shelter.It is estimated that by 2050, this number will reach 3 billion.The largest increase in the homelessness rate was recorded in Iceland (by 168% from 2009 to 2017, although the homelessness rate remained low, at 0.1% of the total population).In turn, Norway and Finland recorded the largest decreases in the homelessness rate (in Norway, it fell by 40% in 2012-2016, and in Finland by 39% in 2010-2018).In such countries as Austria, Canada, Denmark, Poland, Slovenia, and Sweden, the homelessness rate has remained relatively stable in recent years (7).In Israel, in 2018-2020, the homeless population almost doubled, from about one person to almost 800 people (7).
At this point, it is worth noting that compared to the countries of Western Europe and other developed countries of the world, where the issue of homelessness has been the subject of systematic reflection in social sciences for many decades, this phenomenon was scientifically diagnosed in Poland very late (8) and it is a problem that is still not fully diagnosed.A relatively new phenomenon in Poland is the increase in the group of homeless foreigners, who often stay illegally, and the so-called 'homeless by choice' who wander from city to city (free birds, 'giants' , vagabonds), who reject all applicable norms and consciously remain on the margins of social life (1).
Homelessness is associated with poorer health status and affects men, women, children, and veterans (9).
Several recent studies indicated that 20-31% of homeless adults endorse such alcohol related problems (10,11).Compared with housed populations, alcoholism, anemia, and growth problems are more common among homeless persons.
In this study, we tried to evaluate the health behaviors in a group of men experiencing a homelessness crisis in Poland.
Health behaviors have been defined as 'overt behavioral patterns, actions, and habits that relate to health maintenance, to health restoration, and to health improvement' (12).A variety of behaviors fall within such a definition, including smoking, alcohol use, diet, physical activity, sexual behaviors, physician visits, medication adherence, screening, and vaccination.Four widely studied health behaviors that are a regular focus of attention are smoking, binge drinking and physical activity (13,14).
Many health psychology research has examined the psychological determinants of health behaviors (15).Several general models of such determinants have been developed including the health belief model; protection motivation theory, self-determination theory, theory of reasoned action/theory of planned behavior; and social cognitive theory.These models contain several common determinants: intentions, self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, perceived susceptibility, and perceived severity.
Medical anthropology studies how health and illness are shaped, experienced, and understood in the context of cultural, historical, and political forces.Perhaps anthropology's greatest contribution to our knowledge of homelessness has been a description and understanding of the methods of adaptation and survival in life on the streets and in the shelters (16).The thick, ethnographic descriptions of the daily rounds of the homeless have brought the concept of "the street" to life in these studies.As a group, anthropologists see the street (in its full metaphoric sense) as one of the sites for the kinds of adaptations to contemporary life that some homeless people make.
Understanding the experiences, practices, and perceptions of homeless people in health behaviors is essential to perform effective interventions to improve health outcomes.Furthermore, there are few studies on health behaviors in homeless people.
We wanted to explore selected aspects of mental health including health behaviors, self-efficacy, and locus of control in homeless men.The detailed aims included the assessment of selected health behaviors, need for health care and education, life satisfaction, the strength of the general conviction of the respondents as to the effectiveness of coping with difficult situations and obstacles, sense of the health locus of control and the dependence of the above on the phase of homelessness in the group of people experiencing homelessness crisis compared to those who do not experience it.

Materials and methods
The research performance received the consent of the Bioethics Committee, R-I-449/2013.The main research was preceded by a pilot study in each group of 50 people, which made it possible to verify the clarity of the statements formulated in the questionnaires and to finally develop the original questionnaire.The research covered fully The selection of the groups was purposeful, and the research was carried out with the diagnostic survey method with the use of:

Instruments
The original questionnaires (version for the homeless and those who are not homeless) consisting of 40 particular questions and questions concerning various aspects of homelessness was used.This survey was not validated.It consists of three parts.The standardized Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), Diener, Emmons, Larsen, Griffin, in Polish Juczyński, version for other professionals who are not psychologists, to assess the extent to which the respondent relates to their current life was used (17).The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) consists of five statements.The subjects assessed the degree to which the statements describe their lives so far: 1 meant "I strongly disagree, " 2 -"I disagree, " 3 -"I somewhat disagree, " 4 -"I neither agree nor disagree, " 5 -"I somewhat agree, " 6 -"I agree" and 7 -"I strongly agree." The scores were summed up, and the general result described the level of satisfaction with one's life.The scores could range from 5 to 35 points, where higher values corresponded to higher satisfaction with life: 5-9 points -for a person extremely dissatisfied with his life, 10-14 points -for a person dissatisfied with his life, 15-19 points -a person slightly dissatisfied with his life, 20 points -a person neither satisfied nor dissatisfied with his life, 21-25 points -a person slightly satisfied with his life, 26-30 points -a person satisfied with his life, 31-35 points -a person delighted with his life.In the interpretation of the results, the specificity of the sten scale was also taken into account.1-4 sten scores were considered low, 7-10 sten scores were considered high, and 5-6 sten scores were considered average.The Cronbach's α values start at 0.86 (15).
The standardized Health Behavior Inventory (HBI) according to Juczyński -containing 24 questions describing various types of health-related behaviors (eating habits, preventive behaviors, positive mental attitudes, health practices) in the last 12 months (17).The answers to these questions were graded using a five-point scale where one corresponds to nearly never and five to nearly always.Based on this point system, the mean level of health behaviors was calculated for each category.The total HBI was calculated as the sum of all points gathered.Theoretically, the total HBI could range from 24 points (all answers graded 1) to 120 points (all answers graded 5).These values are presented and interpreted using the standard 10 scale (women: low 24-77 pts., moderate 78-91 pts., high 92-120 pts.; males: low 24-71 pts., moderate 72-86 pts., high 87-120 pts).Cronbach's reliability index (alpha index) of HBI was calculated to be 0.85, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 depending on the analyzed category of health behaviors.The General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES)-R.Schwarzer, M. Jerusalern, Z. Juczyński-measuring the strength of an individual's general conviction as to the effectiveness of coping with difficult situations and obstacles (17).The respondent chooses one of four possible responses: no −1, rather no -2, rather yes -3, yes -4.The total score presents a general indicator of self-efficacy, which can vary from 10 to 40 points.High scores represent a high sense of self-efficacy.The general indicator was transformed into standardized units and was interpreted according to the characteristics of the sten score.1-4 sten scores were considered low, 7-10 sten scores were considered high, and 5-6 sten scores were considered average.The Cronbach's α of the scale is high -0.85.
The Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC-B) Scale version B of B. Wallston, B. S. Wallston, R. DeVellis, in the Polish adaptation of Juczyński -assessing generalized expectations of the respondents in three dimensions of the health locus of control: internal (conviction that control over my own health depends on me); the impact of others (conviction that the state of my health is the result of the impact of others, mainly medical personnel) and chance (the state of health depends on chance or other external factors).The results obtained allow the classification of the respondents into the following types: Strong Internal, Strong External, Decreasing the Impact of Others; Increasing the Impact of Others; Decreasing the Impact of Chance; Increasing the Impact of Chance, Undifferentiated-Strong and Undifferentiated-Weak (17).

Statistical analysis
The Statistica 13.0 PL program was used for statistical calculations.The Chi2 test was used to compare response rates between groups.Statistical relationships between satisfaction with life, health behaviors, coping with difficult situations and dimensions of the health locus of control in the surveyed group of homeless men and age, phase of homelessness and criminal record calculated with the use of multiple regression analysis.Statistical significance was evaluated at p < 0.05.

Characteristics of the study group
In the study group of 153 homeless men, the largest number was in the age range from 51 to 60 (36.6%), divorced men (55.5%), having children (59.5%), but not maintaining contact with them (53.6%).Most frequently, the respondents had a permanent address of residence in a city with a population over 200,000 (59.6%) and vocational education (52.3%),Details are shown in Table 1.

Results
The most common reasons for homelessness were eviction, residence address deregistration (41.8%), family conflicts (30.7%), unemployment, lack of work and lack of sources of income (22.2).Details are shown in Table 2.
In the next part of the study, the health habits of the respondents were assessed.92.2% of the surveyed homeless people and none of the men from the control group did not wash every day.The largest number of the homeless and men from the control group declared that they eat lunch (71.2 and 64.7% respectively) and dinner (77.1 and 58.3% respectively) every day.More than half (55%) of homeless drunk alcohol.Details are shown in Table 3.
The respondents were asked to rate their health from 0 to 10 on a scale.Most frequently, the homeless chose 5 points in their health self-assessment (33 people-21.6%),and men from the control group chose 7 points (23.3%).The homeless men assessed their health poorer (6.0 ± 2.7 points) than the non-homeless (7.8 ± 2.2 points) (p < 0.001).
In the homeless group, 98 (64.1%) and 312 (91.0%) in the control group did not have a disability degree certificate.
The respondents declared that: • they use professional medical assistance when necessary: the homeless-60 (39.2%) and the non-homeless -80 (25.6%)-p = 0.030 • they did not use it at all: the homeless-39 (25.5%) and the non-homeless-10 (3.2%)-(p < 0.001) • several times a year: the homeless-12 (7.8%) and the non-homeless-62 (19.9%)-p = 0.005 • several times a month: the homeless-7 people (4.6%) and the non-homeless-32 (10.3%)-NS In a situation where they feel pain, any ailments: • they immediately went to the doctor and used medicines prescribed by them-49 (32%) homeless people and 130 (41.7%) men from the NS control group • they only used their own tested methods -48 (31.4%) homeless people and 72 (23.1%) men from the NS control group • they did nothing and tried to wait out the ailments-28 (18.3%) homeless people and 50 (16%) men from the NS control group • they did not go to the doctor because they could not afford it-25 (16.3%) homeless people and 20 (6.4%) men from the control group p = 0.004 • 3 (2%) homeless people and 40 (12.8%)men from the control group had problems with the declaration on this issue p < 0.001 21 (13.7%)homeless people and 214 (68.6%) people from the control group (p < 0.001) used the help of the general practitioner.
In the last year, 48 (31.4%) surveyed homeless men and 70 (22.4%)from the control group did not use medical assistance-NS.
In the last year, 62 (40.5%) surveyed homeless men and 284 (91%) from the control group were not in hospital-p < 0.001.
The respondents were asked about the declaration of visits for the internist, dentist and lung x-rays.Most often, the homeless claimed that they did not remember the last time they had visited an internist (53.6%), dentist (52.3%) and when they had a lung x-ray (51%).Details are shown in Table 4.
In the assessment of satisfaction with life (SWLS), the homeless men obtained 15.4 ± 8.1 points on average (people rather dissatisfied with their lives), and in the control group -23.2 ± 5.5 on average (people rather satisfied with their lives).In assessing the effectiveness of coping with difficult situations and obstacles, the homeless men obtained 18.5 ± 5.7 points, and the control group obtained 29.1 ± 1.2 points.The homeless in the point scale in the assessment of health behaviors (HBI) obtained 62.4 ± 21.9 points on average, and the control group obtained 82.1 ± 10.8 points.The homeless obtained the highest average values for positive mental attitude (2.9 ± 1.1 points on average), and the control group for health practices (3.9 ± 0.7).The homeless and the control group obtained the lowest mean values for proper eating habits (2.3 ± 1.0 and 3.5 ± 0.9, respectively).In assessing the dimensions of the health locus of control, the homeless obtained the highest average values in the dimension of chance -19.2 ± 9.1 points on average, and the control group in the internal dimension (26.0 ± 5.2).Details are shown in Table 6.
Statistically significant correlations were found between the internal dimension of health behavior control and age, homelessness phase, criminal history of the respondents, being under constant medical care and health self-assessment.The 'Impact of others' dimension showed significant statistical differences with the level of health behaviors, and the 'chance' dimension with the criminal record of the respondents.The level of the presented health behaviors showed statistically significant differences with all dimensions of the health locus of control (Table 7).

Discussion
In the present study, health behaviors of homeless men showed statistically significant diversification with all dimensions of the health locus of control, and its internal dimension with age, homelessness phase, the respondents' criminal history, being under constant medical care, and self-assessment of health.We found significant differences between the homeless men and controls in selected aspects concerning the everyday life hygiene, health self-assessment, declarations of visits to a specialist and carrying out check-ups, level of satisfaction with life, coping with difficult situations, preferred pro-health behaviors and dimensions of health control.
In the study by Baranowski (18), which covered 91 homeless people, 80.2% were men and people aged 51 to 60 (37.4%) and 41 to 50 (34.1%).This was confirmed by research conducted by Pindral (7), which also showed a much higher percentage of men in the homeless group (on average four times); research conducted by Śledzianowski (19)-in which he also found the dominance of men (90.7%) and the research from 2019, in which it was shown that the largest number of homeless people were aged 41-60 (45.5% of people) (20).The above was also confirmed in the current study, in which the largest number, i.e., 36.6%, of men were in the age range from 51 to 60.
In the study by Baranowski (18), 46.2% of the homeless declared vocational education, 24.1%-primary or incomplete primary education, 17.6%-secondary education, 7.7%-general secondary education, and 2.2%-lower secondary education or higher education.In the group Pindral [7] studied, 75% of homeless people had postprimary education, a 34% higher indicator than the homeless population.In the study by Śledzianowski (19), 50.8% of homeless people had vocational education, 23.5% had primary education, 21.2% had secondary or incomplete secondary education, and 3.9% had higher education.
The literature data show that the homeless population is also dominated by singles, divorcees, people in separation, children, and wives fleeing from home due to violence by their fathers or husbands (20).The homeless people in the 2011 study in Białystok, Suwałki (21) were most often (44%) divorcees; almost 30% of the respondents were unmarried, 15%-married, and 10% were widowed.This has been confirmed in the current study, where divorced people accounted for 55.5% of all homeless people and singles for 32%.
In the literature on homelessness (22,23), there are certain levels of isolation of the homeless which make it difficult to get out of homelessness: economic level (failure to meet needs), social level (lack of interpersonal relationships), individual level (emotional disorders, low self-esteem) and institutional level (confusion in institutional support mechanisms).In the research of Baranowski (11), the most frequently indicated factors causing homelessness were family problems (42.9%) and addictions (41.8%).Inhabitants of Łódź studied by Bartczak et al. (22) indicated addictions (86.5%), eviction from the apartment (78.6%), and loss of a job (62.0%) or being abandoned by the closest family (48.1%) as reasons for becoming homeless.According to a 2019 study, the main cause of homelessness was family conflict (32.2%), addiction (28%), eviction, deregistration (26.3%) and relationship breakdown (18.4%) (22).This has also been confirmed in our research because, in the case of our respondents, the homelessness crisis was most often caused by eviction, deregistration (41.8%), and family conflicts (30.7%).
In the research by Baranowski (18), 62.6% of the homeless stayed in various institutions such as hostels, centers for the homeless, or social emergency centers, while the remaining 37.4% occasionally used the offers of eateries and came to various centers for food and clothes.The homeless surveyed by Olech (24), rarely used the services of facilities providing them with shelter, and during the last year, only 7% occasionally lived in a facility for homeless people.According to the 2019 study, 80.2% of the homeless stayed in institutional facilities, such as shelters, while the remaining 19.8% lived outside (20).Contrary to the above data, in the present study, only 24.8% indicated a shelter as the place of their last stay; the respondents most often indicated warming centers (34.6%) and night shelters (29.4%).
In the literature (21,24,25), there is a division of the typology of homeless people into homeless by choice, homeless by force, actually homeless at risk of homelessness, homeless by force, temporarily homeless by choice; shallowly homeless deeply homeless and permanently homeless temporarily homeless.Also (26) five stages of homelessness are distinguished: 1. breakdown of the life plan and breakdown of the family; 2. material poverty, cultural poverty, and social poverty; 3. different dimensions of becoming homeless; 4. adaptation to homelessness; 5. actual, chronic homelessness, when full adaptation to the state of homelessness takes place, lasting 6 to 10 years.The largest group in the 2019 study was people experiencing a homelessness crisis for more than 5 to 10 years-(27.8%)and  homeless people for up to 2 years (23.4%)(20).In the current study, there were significantly more homeless people in the phase up to years (28.5%) and fewer in the group from 5 to 10 (21.9%).In the study of Baranowski (18) only 8.8% of homeless persons had a permanent legal job, The main sources of income for the others were: occasional work (15.4% each), social assistance (12.1%), charitable organizations' assistance (8.8%), disability pension/pension (17.6%), and collecting and selling scrap (5.5%).
Buciński et al. (26) emphasize that the health condition of homeless people is worse than that of the community leading a normal life, and the above depends on many factors and does not allow the treatment of homeless people in a universal way.Basically, the health problem of the homeless is affected by age, length of homelessness, place of stay of the homeless person, aging of the homeless community, and staying in public spaces that increase the risk to health and even life.The issue of homeless people's health should be of key importance for social policy and the system of helping homeless people.
People without a roof over their heads, more often than others, do not have health insurance or an ID card (27).In the research carried out by Śledzianowski (19), 78.7% of women and 60.3% of men had health insurance.The current studies have also confirmed this, as most (86.7%) of our respondents did not have health insurance.
In the study of Śledzianowski (19), 28.7% had a disability degree certificate, usually moderate (64%).In the group of homeless people from the study conducted in 2011 in Białystok, Suwałki (21), 47% had a moderate disability degree, and 30% had a light disability degree.In contrast to the above, in the current study, 64.1% of homeless people did not have a disability certificate.Heszen (28) emphasizes that health consists of four main dimensions: mental, social, somatic, and spiritual.In the context of homelessness, every aspect of health is important.77.4% of homeless people from the Śledzianowski study (19) reported good health.In the current study, the respondents assessed their health as average.
The assessment of the health of the homeless in a shelter in Poznań city (29), showed that the most common diseases they had were parasitic and infectious skin diseases, alcoholism, tuberculosis, hypertension, diseases of the spine and musculoskeletal system, nervous system, and gastrointestinal tract.According to the study (21) conducted in 2011 in Białystok, Suwałki, 50% of the homeless reported feeling unhealthy.In the present study, 48.4% of the homeless claimed they did not suffer from any disorders.
While examining the health of the homeless in a shelter for homeless men in Poznań, Przymeński (29) stated that the homeless usually did not treat their diseases.Śledzianowski (19) demonstrated that 57.1% of the homeless people used medical services last year.In the current study, 31.4% of the respondents did not use medical assistance in the last year.
Przymeński (29) closely connects the poor health of the homeless to their living conditions, including poor hygiene, malnutrition, lack of adequate protection against low temperatures, constant stress, lack of satisfaction with basic mental and emotional needs, and addiction to drugs and alcohol.According to Tędzialgolska et al. (30), the daily functioning of homeless people was hindered by the lack of possibility to care for hygiene due to the lack of intimacy, basic toiletries, access to water, and clean clothes.This is also confirmed by our research, because as many as 92.2% of the respondents did not wash every day.
Błażej and Bartosz (26) think that excessive alcohol consumption is a very special feature of homeless people.In a Polish study (24), about 70-80% of adult homeless men are addicted to alcohol.In a French study (31), one in five homeless people was alcohol-dependent.In the current study, the respondents reported that they most often consume alcohol occasionally (55.5%).
Homelessness brings such emotional effects as loneliness, powerlessness, fear, and anxiety (26,33).On the other hand, 63.2% of the homeless people from the Śledzianowski study (19) believed they were valuable, and 61.5% did not lose self-confidence.Homeless people from the study by Bodys-Cupak et al. (34) declared a sense of external control over their health and a low sense of effectiveness.Similarly, in the current study, homeless people showed a low level of effectiveness in coping with difficult situations and obstacles but a high level of internal control, indicating the belief that control over their health lies with them.Unfortunately, the homeless respondents also showed a low level of satisfaction with life and a low level of health behaviors, the highest for the sphere of a positive mental attitude and the lowest for proper eating habits.
In conclusion, it is worth emphasizing once again that the problem of homelessness is a broad and extremely complicated phenomenon (35)(36)(37).The struggle for survival and the necessity to satisfy basic needs preclude focusing on one's health and taking care of its good condition and often contributes to its deterioration.Therefore, several actions should be taken to protect health.Unfortunately, health for people in the homeless crisis is no longer a value and a determinant of action; hence, problems may arise in complying with the basic principles of treatment and in remission diseases.However, in the current study, as many as 60.1% of the respondents claimed that they always follow medical recommendations, 39.2% did it sometimes or never, and 74.5% were not under constant medical care.The above shows that medical assistance for the homeless requires considering several different variables, including the entire social context.Our results suggest that the groups of men whom special measures should cover are those in the homelessness phase up to 4 years and people with a criminal record.

Study limitations
The small size of the group and the lack of evaluation in the group of women can be considered as limitations of the study.

Practical implications
Homeless people should be provided with free health care.Homeless people should have access to specialist doctors.It is advisable to monitor the health behaviors of the homeless to get to know them better.

Future research directions
The research should be carried out on a larger population in different country regions.
Research should also include homeless women.

Conclusion
1.The level of the health behaviors showed statistically significant diversification with all dimensions of the health locus of control and its internal dimension with age, phase of homelessness, criminal history of the respondents, being under constant medical care, and self-assessment of health.2. Significant differences were found between people experiencing a homelessness crisis and the control group in selected aspects concerning the everyday life hygiene of the respondents, health self-assessment, declarations of visits to a specialist and carrying out check-ups, level of satisfaction with life, coping with difficult situations, preferred pro-health behaviors and dimensions of health control.
Białystok at the St. Brother Albert Home for the homeless of Caritas of the Archdiocese of Białystok, Men's Night Shelter of Caritas of the Archdiocese of Białystok, Women's Night Shelter of Caritas of the Archdiocese of Białystok, Emergency Help Point of the ELEOS Orthodox Mercy Center of the Białystok-Gdańsk Diocese and 312 people who do not experience a homelessness crisis (control group).

TABLE 1
Characteristics of the study group.

TABLE 2
Selected aspects of homelessness in the group of respondents.
*Multiple answers possible.

TABLE 3
Selected aspects concerning the everyday life hygiene of the respondents.
Chi-square test.Bold letters for significant values.

TABLE 4
Declaration of visits to the internist, the dentist, and for a lung X-ray.

TABLE 5
Declaration of the frequency of experiencing selected ailments.
Chi-square test; NS, not significant.Bold letters for significant values.

TABLE 6
Results of the analysis using SWLS, GSES, HBI and MHCL-B scales.

TABLE 7
Statistical relationships between satisfaction with life, health behaviors, coping with difficult situations and dimensions of the health locus of control in the surveyed group of the homeless and age, homelessness phase and criminal record.