Impact of leisure satisfaction on perceived risk of infectious disease during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from new worker classes

Introduction This study examines how job market changes affect individuals’ leisure choices and satisfaction, focusing on worker classes that have undergone daily life changes (e.g., economic and social activities) due to the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods A population-based cross-sectional study design was employed. South Korean workers aged 20–59 years answered an online survey administered from September 14 to October 4, 2021. Ultimately, 764 responses were used in the analysis. The measures used in this study consisted of factors affecting infectious disease risk perception and leisure satisfaction among the six new worker classes that emerged during the pandemic, according to socio-demographic status. Results The results showed that among male participants, social, emotional, physical, environmental, and educational factors of leisure satisfaction were more strongly affected, with higher social, physical, and interpersonal relationships being factors in the perception of infectious disease risk. Among female participants, the interpersonal relationship factor of perceived risk was significantly affected by the social, emotional, and educational factors of leisure satisfaction. Interpersonal relationships, affected leisure satisfaction among members of Classes 1–3, who experienced no change in pay. However, for the members of Class6 who experienced a decrease in pay, the economic factor negatively affected leisure satisfaction and played a pivotal role in our findings. Conclusion This study verified the risk factors that inhibit leisure satisfaction among new worker classes that emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the psychological health of people suffering pandemic-related financial constraints was affected, as they experienced a lower quality of life owing to reduced leisure activities and satisfaction.


Introduction
During the coronavirus disease pandemic (COVID- 19) in South Korea, work and leisure activities, essential elements of human life, were significantly affected due to public health and safety measures (1).To address the pandemic, strict social distancing measures were implemented, leading to the transformation of numerous leisure activities into home-based endeavors, thereby blurring the boundaries between domestic life and leisure pursuits (2)(3)(4)(5)(6).
Satisfaction derived from work, wages, and leisure significantly influences overall life satisfaction (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12).Higher incomes have been associated with a more diverse range of leisure activities, contributing to increased positive life satisfaction (13).Conversely, financial stress inhibits participation in leisure activities (14).The pandemic worsened employment challenges, resulting in an increase in temporary and low-wage jobs, further widening the wage gap among different worker classes (15).These economic disparities directly impacted leisure opportunities, especially for newly classified worker classes (16).
Additionally, stringent regulations limited gatherings to four or fewer individuals until 6 p.m., exclusively for fully vaccinated individuals.Post 6 p.m., gatherings were further restricted to a maximum of two individuals.Furthermore, restaurants, cafes, and indoor sports facilities were allowed to operate until 10 p.m (17).These measures significantly restricted leisure activities, adversely impacting leisure satisfaction and overall quality of life.
Amid the economic challenges brought on by COVID-19, individuals' perceptions of infectious diseases as a significant threat to their financial stability led to profound psychological distress (18).The emergence of new working classes during the pandemic intensified existing inequalities (19).Professionals and managerial workers with remote work options (Classes 1-3) fared better, while Class 6 workers in sectors like retail and restaurants faced severe economic hardship (16).Economic instability directly limits leisure activities due to financial constraints, underscoring the need to explore shifts in leisure pursuits across all working classes amid pandemic-induced economic fluctuations.
Understanding leisure needs and satisfaction is crucial for comprehending how individuals select and continue to participate in leisure activities (20)(21)(22).COVID-19 has drastically altered the landscape of leisure activities (23,24) and satisfaction, as individuals adjusted their pursuits in response to the perceived physical and functional risks associated with the virus (20,(25)(26)(27)(28).This study examines the transformations in leisure activities and satisfaction influenced by changes in working hours and financial conditions caused by the pandemic.Specifically, it investigates the decline in individual leisure engagement throughout the pandemic, attributing it to factors such as altered economic activities, fear of disease transmission, and adherence to social norms that discouraged physical contact.The study specifically focuses on the unique challenges faced by different working classes, aiming to discern how pandemic-induced shifts in the labor market and resulting risk perceptions influenced their leisure choices and satisfaction levels.The study findings serve as a foundation to formulate strategies to address the limitations faced by working classes in leisure activities, introduce innovative leisure pursuits, and enhance overall leisure satisfaction (Figure 1).

Methods
Workers in their 20s to 50s engaged in leisure activities were recruited through convenience sampling.The survey was administered online from September 14 to October 4, 2021, by the Korean research company Macromill Embrain.Before taking the survey, research participants were educated on the content, purpose, and ethics of the study.A survey was administered to those who agreed to participate.We gave respondents a mobile coupon worth 3,000 won (2-3 dollars) as an incentive for participating in this study.A total of 790 responses were collected, indicating a return rate of 95%.After excluding 26 surveys with multiple or missing responses, as well as those inaccurately written, 764 copies were analyzed.

Research participants
Reich (19) classified new classes of workers that emerged after the outbreak of COVID-19.(1) The Essentials-1: Workers maintaining their regular work hours and wages in spite of the pandemic.(2) The Essentials-2: Workers operating with reduced hours or alternating workdays while maintaining their pre-pandemic wages.(3) The Unpaid-1: Employees continuing to work as usual but receiving reduced wages.(4) The Unpaid-2: Workers operating with reduced hours or alternating workdays and receiving reduced wages.(5) The Forgotten: Employees on unpaid leave, working in temporarily closed workplaces, placed on standby, or not working at all during the pandemic.Based on this, Kim and Kang (16) classified six new classes specific to Korea and developed corresponding scales for these new classes.The demographic characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1.

Measurement instrument
The collected data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0.After completing the first draft of the survey, one professor and two PhD-holders in the field of leisure science verified its content validity to confirm item content appropriateness.A frequency analysis was conducted to investigate the variables representing socio-demographic characteristics, and an exploratory factor analysis was conducted to examine the components of infectious disease risk perception and leisure satisfaction.To verify reliability, internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's α.Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to analyze the relationship between the risk perception of infectious disease and leisure satisfaction according to sociodemographic factors.

Measurement tools
The research measures used in this study captured perceptions of the risk of infectious disease, leisure, and leisure satisfaction among each new class of worker during the pandemic.The sociodemographic variables used by Kim and Kang (16) and Sun (29), were modified and supplemented pursuant to the purposes of the present

Perception of the risk of infectious diseases
A scale measuring the perceived risk of fine dust (30) that was modified pursuant to the COVID-19 pandemic and a scale measuring the perception of risks related to COVID-19 (31) were used.The adapted scale comprises 11 items across four (economic, social, physical, and interpersonal) relationship factors, measured on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 5 ("strongly agree").The results of the exploratory factor analysis conducted to determine the validity of the tool are shown in Table 2.These four factors were extracted from the 11 input items.Data were examined using Bartlett's test of sphericity and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test to determine whether the population followed a normal distribution and whether the data were appropriate for factor analysis.

Leisure satisfaction
Leisure satisfaction was measured using the Korean Leisure Satisfaction Scale (KLSS) (21) based on the Leisure Satisfaction Scale (LSS) (32).The original LSS consists of psychological, educational, physical, relaxational, physiological, and environmental factors, whereas the KLSS includes five factors: social, emotional, physical, environmental, and educational.This study used a survey consisting of 24 items, each measured on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 5 ("strongly agree").The results of the exploratory factor analysis conducted to verify the validity of the tool for measuring leisure satisfaction are shown in Table 3.
To determine whether the population followed a normal distribution and whether the data were appropriate for factor analysis, Bartlett's test of sphericity and the KMO test were applied.According to Bartlett's test, the resulting value was 0.888, overall cumulative variance was 75.760%, and approximate chi-squared value was 5,949.643,p < 0.001.The reliability of each factor of the tool used in Lee and Kim (30) was above 0.60, with social satisfaction at 0.908, emotional satisfaction at 0.931, physical satisfaction at 0.916, environmental satisfaction at 0.913, and educational satisfaction at 0.885.The reliability of the tool used in the present study was 0.951, as represented by the Cronbach's alpha.

Results
This study revealed a gap in leisure activities caused by changes in economic and work conditions that formed the basis of everyday life during the COVID-19 pandemic.It also investigated how differences in infectious disease risk perception affected one's choice of and satisfaction with leisure.

Relationship between leisure satisfaction and perception of infectious disease risk
The following results support the first research question, whether "infectious disease risk perception will affect leisure satisfaction, " to identify the effect of the perceived risk of infectious disease on leisure satisfaction.Table 4 shows the results of a multiple regression analysis, where the perception of the risk of infectious disease (economic, social, physical, and interpersonal relationships) was input as the independent variable, and leisure satisfaction (social, emotional, physical, environmental, and educational) was set as the dependent variable.
The following sub-factors of perception of infectious disease risk, predicting the social factor of leisure satisfaction, showed positive effects: perception of risk -interpersonal (β = 0.233, t = 5.868, p < 0.001), perception of risk -social (β = 0.087, t = 2.285, p < 0.05), and perception of risk -physical (β = 0.072, t = 2.021, p < 0.05).With the input of risk perception sub-factors to the regression equation, the explanatory power of the final regression model was 7.4% (R 2 = 0.074), which was statistically significant (F = 16.115,p < 0.001).Next, perception of risk -social (β = 0.237, t = 6.446, p < 0.001), a sub-factor of perception of infectious disease risk that predicts the emotional factor of leisure satisfaction, was found to have a positive effect.With the input of the risk perception sub-factor to the regression equation, the explanatory power of the final regression model was 12.5% (R 2 = 0.125), which was statistically significant (F = 28.274,p < 0.001).

Effects of the perception of infectious disease risk on leisure satisfaction according to sex
Tables 5, 6 present the results, verifying whether infectious disease perception risk, affects leisure satisfaction based on classification by sex.
According to the research results, the social factor in leisure satisfaction for male participants was positively related to the following sub-factors of perceived infectious disease risk: perception of risk -interpersonal relationship (β = 0.286, t = 5.415, p < 0.001), perception of risk -social (β = 0.167, t = 3.339, p < 0.001), and perception of risk -physical (β = 0.097, t = 2.044, p < 0.05).With the input of risk perception sub-factors to the regression equation, the explanatory power of the final regression model was 12.5% (R 2 = 0.125), which was statistically significant (F = 15.278,p < 0.001).
The emotional factor in leisure satisfaction was positively affected by perception of risk -social, a sub-factor of perception of infectious disease risk (β = 0.264, t = 5.379, p < 0.001).With the input of this sub-factor in the regression equation, the explanatory power of the final regression model was 15.0% (R 2 = 0.150), which was statistically significant (F = 28.274,p < 0.001).
Finally, the educational factor in leisure satisfaction was positively related to the following sub-factors of the perception of infectious disease risk: perception of risk -interpersonal (β = 0.225, t = 4.191, p < 0.001), perception of risk -social (β = 0.143, t = 2.816, p < 0.001), and perception of risk -physical (β = 0.114, t = 2.355, p < 0.05).With the input of risk perception sub-factors on the regression equation, the explanatory power of the final regression model was 9.8% (R 2 = 0.098), which was statistically significant (F = 11.893,p < 0.001).
Among female participants, the social factor in leisure satisfaction was positively affected by the perception of risk -interpersonal, a sub-variable of perception of infectious disease risk (β = 0.186, t = 3.116, p < 0.001).With the input of the risk perception sub-factor on the regression equation, the explanatory power of the final regression model was 4.3% (R 2 = 0.043), which was statistically significant (F = 5.023, p < 0.001).
The emotional factor in leisure satisfaction was positively related to the following sub-factors of perception of infectious disease risk: perception of risk -social (β = 0.183, t = 3.273, p < 0.001) and perception of risk -interpersonal (β = 0.162, t = 2.789, p < 0.001).With the input of risk perception sub-factors on the regression equation, the explanatory power of the final regression model was 9.8% (R 2 = 0.098), which was statistically significant (F = 10.822,p < 0.001).
Next, the physical factor in leisure satisfaction was positively related to perception of risk -physical, a sub-variable of perception of infectious disease risk (β = 0.175, t = 3.329, p < 0.001).With the input of the risk perception sub-factor on the regression equation, the explanatory power of the final regression model was 4.9% (R 2 = 0.049), which was statistically significant (F = 5.622, p < 0.001).Finally, the educational factor in leisure satisfaction was also positively related to perception of risk -interpersonal (β = 0.163, t = 2.716, p < 0.001), a sub-variable of perception of infectious disease risk.With the input of the risk perception sub-factor to the regression equation, the explanatory power of the final regression model was 9.8% (R 2 = 0.098), which was statistically significant (F = 11.892,p < 0.001).

Effects of the perception of infectious disease risk on leisure satisfaction according to new worker classes
Table 7 presents the results of verifying whether the proposition that "infectious disease risk perception, according to the characteristics of new worker classes, will affect leisure satisfaction" can examine the effects of the perception of infectious disease risk on leisure satisfaction according to sociodemographic characteristics.
According to the research, the leisure satisfaction of participants in Class 1 among the new classes of workers was positively affected by the following sub-variables of perception of infectious disease risk: perception of risk -interpersonal (β = 0.392, t = 3.968, p < 0.001) and perception of risk -physical (β = 0.195, t = 2.148, p < 0.01).With the input of risk perception sub-factors to the regression equation, the explanatory power of the final regression model was 23.8% (R 2 = 0.238), which was statistically significant (F = 8.820, p < 0.001).
The leisure satisfaction of participants in Class 2 was positively affected by the following sub-variables of perception of infectious disease risk: perception of risk -interpersonal (β = 0.185, t = 3.840, p < 0.001) and perception of risk -social (β = 0.127, t = 2.744, p < 0.001).With the input of risk perception sub-factors on the regression equation, the explanatory power of the final regression model was 7.2% (R 2 = 0.072), which was statistically significant (F = 10.399,p < 0.001).
The leisure satisfaction of participants in Class 3 was positively affected by perception of risk -interpersonal (β = 0.568, t = 3.557, Frontiers in Public Health 09 frontiersin.orgp < 0.001).With the input of the risk perception sub-factor on the regression equation, the explanatory power of the final regression model was 35.6% (R 2 = 0.356), which was statistically significant (F = 6.384, p < 0.001).
The leisure satisfaction of participants in Class 6-those experiencing unpaid leave (furlough), closed businesses, and on standby for work-was positively affected by perception of risksocial (β = 0.399, t = 2.869, p < 0.001) and negatively affected by perception of risk -economic (β = −0.332,t = −2.573,p < 0.01).With the input of risk perception sub-factors to the regression equation, the explanatory power of the final regression model was 19.7% (R 2 = 0.197), which was statistically significant (F = 4.611, p < 0.001).

Discussion
The results of this study show that infectious disease risk perception differs between men and women both in general and for each affected factor of leisure satisfaction.Specifically, male participants were greatly affected by social, emotional, physical, environmental, and educational factors of leisure satisfaction, with an increase in the social, physical, and interpersonal relationship aspects of the perception of infectious disease risk.Moreover, the interpersonal factor of risk perception among female participants significantly affected social, emotional, and educational leisure satisfaction factors.The emotional, physical, and social factors of leisure satisfaction were negatively affected by the higher social, physical, and interpersonal relationship factors of risk perception.Therefore, for male participants, the interactive relationship with other leisure participants (i.e., the social factor) plays an important role in leisure satisfaction.Among female participants, interpersonal relationships also play an important role, indicating that a sense of stability obtained through leisure activities is necessary for leisure satisfaction.Therefore, leisure satisfaction has implications for participation in leisure activities and differences in participation according to sex (26,33,34).
Gender and age differences in life satisfaction before and after the vaccination era may be influenced by a variety of factors outlined in prior research (35)(36)(37)(38).Previous studies suggest that different societal roles, individual health concerns, and varying perceptions of vaccine efficacy and safety across demographic groups can play pivotal roles in these disparities (39)(40)(41).Earlier studies have highlighted how societal expectations and responsibilities shaped by gender, can significantly impact one's perception of life satisfaction.Additionally, age-related health concerns and susceptibility to the virus may contribute to differences in life satisfaction post-vaccination.
The impact of demographic, health-related, and psychosocial factors on COVID-19 vaccine intentions has been evident.Factors such as older age, being male, involvement in the care of confirmed COVID-19 patients, chronic health conditions, higher self-confidence, collective responsibility, and acceptance of the influenza vaccination administration in 2019 were associated with a greater intention to receive the COVID-19 vaccine (42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47).According to Mo et al. (48), a possible link exists between COVID-19 vaccine intention and increased life satisfaction among some Healthcare Workers (HCWs) who received the vaccine, irrespective of gender." According to Min (49), married men may expect less leisure time than married women, as men have longer paid working hours; however, this applies only when the number of paid working hours is considered.Upon examining time constraints in terms of leisure, married women suffer from a serious lack of leisure time, as women's overall work hours (such as those spent doing household labor), are overwhelmingly longer than those of men.Therefore, leisure activities and satisfaction decreased among married women.According to a national survey on leisure activities after the COVID-19 pandemic, the "percentages of continuous leisure activities by gender and age" were 39.5 and 31.4% for men and women, respectively (50).In addition, differences between sexes in external mobility and interpersonal communication have significantly increased since the implementation of social distancing policies, with more evident differences for women than men (51,52).Thus, the factors of risk perception felt between the sexes vary.Therefore, leisure satisfaction should be addressed by implementing sex-specific measures to reduce risk perception.
Furthermore, the infectious disease risk perception in new worker classes was found to affect leisure.For participants in Classes 1-3, the interpersonal relationship factor in risk perception affected leisure satisfaction.In contrast, the economic factor of risk perception negatively affected leisure satisfaction for those in Class 6.Thus, those who suffered employment instability due to the pandemic did not enjoy leisure activities because of economic and safety concerns, leading to decreased leisure satisfaction.
Previous studies related to human labor activities, leisure activities, and life satisfaction have only examined the relationships among these variables because the broadest areas of human life can be largely divided into labor and leisure.Research on the effects of labor or leisure activities on life satisfaction includes studies on employment stability, leisure activities, life satisfaction (8, 9, 53, 54), determinants of life satisfaction or quality of life (55,56), and labor and life satisfaction (11,(57)(58)(59)(60).However, COVID-19 has significantly changed the current labor market.People affected by changes in their job or economic status (e.g., reduced income) due to COVID-19 demonstrate low investment rates, such as low equipment consumption for at-home physical activities (61).Moreover, people with lower incomes have been significantly negatively impacted in terms of physical activity and eating habits (62,63).
Before the pandemic, leisure satisfaction was associated with positive mental and physical health outcomes.Engaging in leisure activities was linked to reduced stress, improved mood, and overall stronger life satisfaction.The perceived risk of infectious diseases was not a prominent factor in leisure decision-making for most people, except in regions where certain diseases are endemic (64).
During the COVID-19 pandemic, leisure activities have undergone significant global transformations.Due to strict social distancing measures, lockdowns, and fear of infection, the landscape of leisure activities shifted dramatically after the onset of the pandemic.Indoor activities with large crowds were restricted, leading to a surge in interest in outdoor and solitary pursuits.Leisure satisfaction became closely tied to activities that could be conducted safely, often individually, or within small and trusted groups.The perceived risk of infectious diseases became a crucial factor in people's leisure decision-making, with safety taking precedence over personal activity preferences (65,66).
After the COVID-19 pandemic, with the advent of the postvaccination era in late 2020 and 2021, the situation regarding leisure activities and perceived risk of infectious diseases gradually improved.Vaccination efforts significantly reduced the risk of severe illness and death from COVID-19, leading to the relaxation of restrictions.People began to return to some semblance of pre-pandemic life and leisure activities.However, a certain level of caution persisted.Some individuals continued to prefer outdoor or socially distanced activities and vaccination status played a significant role in people's comfort levels.For instance, fully vaccinated individuals felt more secure about engaging in leisure activities (67).
Frontiers in Public Health 11 frontiersin.org In this context, it is crucial to not only highlight the newfound freedom from COVID-19 due to vaccinations, but also emphasize the impact of government-mandated social distancing measures and the perception that COVID-19 might not be as dangerous as initially feared.
Furthermore, it is essential to recognize the newly classified socioeconomic class, Class 6, which was economically impacted during the pandemic.Exploring the leisure satisfaction of this class during the current phase of infectious disease recovery is essential.Post-2022 research is imperative to comprehensively understand whether the leisure satisfaction of Class 6 has returned to pre-pandemic levels, increased, remained stable, or declined compared with the period during COVID-19.Such an inquiry will highlight the evolving dynamics of leisure satisfaction, especially among economically affected groups, in the face of the ongoing challenges posed by infectious diseases such as COVID-19.
Moreover, given the continued economic challenges not only in Korea but also globally after the COVID-19 pandemic (68,69), socioeconomic class represented by Class 6 will likely face even greater economic hardship.Considering that other socioeconomic classes may also experience financial difficulties, it is essential to conduct post-COVID-19 leisure satisfaction surveys for all classes.This research provides valuable insights into the evolving landscape of leisure satisfaction across various socioeconomic groups, offering crucial information for the development of targeted policies and support programs.In the workplace, employers can promote employee well-being and satisfaction by offering flexible work arrangements, such as designated leisure time or breaks, to alleviate time constraints and enhance work-life balance.Employers should be encouraged to foster a positive work environment that supports leisure activities and provides resources for employees to engage in meaningful and fulfilling leisure experiences (70-72), and the government should be involved in promoting leisure activities and addressing the identified barriers to leisure satisfaction.The government could collaborate with relevant stakeholders to develop and implement policies that support the provision of diverse and accessible leisure opportunities, and advocate for investment in infrastructure, facilities, and programs that cater to different demographic groups and promote leisure engagement.Additionally, we recommend the allocation of resources to support research, the monitoring of leisure trends, and the development of evidence-based strategies aimed at enhancing leisure satisfaction among different socioeconomic classes (72,73).

Limitations of this research
Given the differing socio-demographic characteristics and risk perceptions among various worker groups, the focus on new worker classes potentially limits the study's broader applicability.Moreover, reliance on a specific sample of new working classes raises concerns regarding the generalizability of the study findings.The sample selection process might introduce biases, affecting the study's external validity by over-or underrepresenting certain working classes.
Furthermore, the study's reliance on self-reported measures, including leisure satisfaction and the perceived risk of infectious diseases, poses a challenge.Self-reporting is susceptible to biases such as social desirability or recall bias, potentially leading to measurement errors and affecting the reliability of findings.Additionally, the cross-sectional nature of the study design raises questions about causality and directionality in the relationship between leisure satisfaction and perceived risk of infectious diseases.The study might not capture all influencing factors, potentially impacting the observed associations.
The absence of control variables, such as age, gender, educational level, or prior health conditions, limits the study's depth.These variables could influence both leisure satisfaction and perceived risk, providing alternative explanations for the observed relationships.Finally, the study's narrow focus, which is solely on the impact of leisure satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic, overlooks the potential influence of other factors on risk perceptions.Neglecting these elements may lead to an incomplete understanding of the dynamics involved in public health crises.
To address these limitations and enhance future research, essential steps are needed, such as considering diverse samples, employing longitudinal designs, integrating objective measures alongside selfreports, incorporating relevant control variables, and broadening the scope of the investigation.

Conclusion
Various studies have been conducted on the relationship between leisure activities and satisfaction according to labor intensity, hours, and wages.It has been found that the higher the job satisfaction, the more diverse the choices of leisure activities, and the higher the leisure satisfaction.However, owing to COVID-19's impact on social and economic conditions, novel classes of workers have emerged, thus widening the disparity among classes.Therefore, this study investigated relationships in leisure satisfaction according to the risk perception experienced by new worker classes.
Our results showed differences between men and women in perceived risk, which resulted in different leisure satisfaction factors.Moreover, we found that physical and interpersonal relationships reduced leisure satisfaction in Classes 1-3.Economic and social risk perception factors were most significantly recognized among Class 6 workers.
This study identified the risk factors that decrease leisure satisfaction for each new class of workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, a time when leisure activities were more important than ever.Furthermore, those who were economically impacted by COVID-19 were also affected in terms of psychological health (e.g., a decreased quality of life due to reduced leisure activities and satisfaction).This study viewed the issue of workers suffering from unstable working conditions and employment problems as a national disaster in South Korea and highlighted the importance of preparing for future incidents.This study provides basic data for the promotion of leisure activities and improvement of satisfaction.Future studies should investigate what can be gained from leisure activities in terms of quality of life and physical and psychological health of the newly formed worker classes.Furthermore, plans must be devised to resolve institutional risks.

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1Proposed research model.

TABLE 2
Exploratory factor analysis of the perception of the risk of infectious disease.

TABLE 3
Exploratory factor analysis of leisure satisfaction.

TABLE 4
Leisure satisfaction according to the perception of the risk of infectious disease.

TABLE 5
Effects of the perception of the risk of infectious disease on leisure satisfaction among male participants (N = 402).

TABLE 6
Effects of the perception of the risk of infectious disease on leisure satisfaction among female participants (N = 362).

TABLE 7
Effects of the perception of the risk of infectious disease by characteristics of new classes of workers on leisure satisfaction (N = 764).