Research trends on biochar-based smart fertilizers as an option for the sustainable agricultural land management: Bibliometric analysis and review

Several studies have investigated nutrient-enriched and nutrient poor biochar to improve soil properties, increase nutrient use efficiency and crop productivity. Review articles have presented formulations and production methods of biochar-based fertilizers. They reported nutrient-enriched biochar improves -45ves crop productivity, soil health and preserves the environment. But so far, none of the studies has conceptualized the nutrient-enriched biochar as a biochar-based smart fertilizer or presented the conceptual and intellectual structures and the collaborative networks of authors and countries working on biochar-based smart fertilizers. For the first time, this study has mapped the scientific knowledge generated on the topic and established a solid ground for its innovative progress and research pursuits. A total of 2,779 scientific publications on biochar-based fertilizers were exported from scopus database in August 2022 and were analyzed using bibliometrix software package and the biblioshiny web interface in R version 4.1.3. The results indicated that the papers in our collection cover the period from 2007 to 2022 with a raising number from 2017 to 2021. Almost all documents (99.38%) were co-authored with an average of 6 authors (5.76) per article. The analysis of keywords and the evolution of topics revealed that biochar-based smart fertilizers in relation to organic nutrient sources, soil microbiology and soil sanitation were the most studied topics in the scientific debates. China had more collaboration in the network working on biochar-based fertilizers, while the West African countries belonging to the network have not developed any collaboration so far. This suggests the formulation of research projects that may involve African countries to work with other countries including China, USA, Germany, Australia and Poland. This study is more comprehensive in terms of a global view of the conceptual and intellectual contours and network of actors on biochar-based smart fertilizers. Future research on the topic should be conducted more in the fields under farmers’ conditions and may focus on (i) enrichment of biochar with nutrients from organic sources before its application to the soil, (ii) soil remediation and microbiology in relation to biochar-based fertilizer applications, and (iii) economic profitability of biochar fertilizers for small-scale farmers.

Several studies have investigated nutrient-enriched and nutrient poor biochar to improve soil properties, increase nutrient use efficiency and crop productivity. Review articles have presented formulations and production methods of biochar-based fertilizers. They reported nutrient-enriched biochar improves -45ves crop productivity, soil health and preserves the environment. But so far, none of the studies has conceptualized the nutrient-enriched biochar as a biochar-based smart fertilizer or presented the conceptual and intellectual structures and the collaborative networks of authors and countries working on biochar-based smart fertilizers. For the first time, this study has mapped the scientific knowledge generated on the topic and established a solid ground for its innovative progress and research pursuits. A total of 2,779 scientific publications on biochar-based fertilizers were exported from scopus database in August 2022 and were analyzed using bibliometrix software package and the biblioshiny web interface in R version 4.1.3. The results indicated that the papers in our collection cover the period from 2007 to 2022 with a raising number from 2017 to 2021. Almost all documents (99.38%) were co-authored with an average of 6 authors (5.76) per article. The analysis of keywords and the evolution of topics revealed that biochar-based smart fertilizers in relation to organic nutrient sources, soil microbiology and soil sanitation were the most studied topics in the scientific debates. China had more collaboration in the network working on biochar-based fertilizers, while the West African countries belonging to the network have not developed any collaboration so far. This suggests the formulation of research projects that may involve African countries to work with other countries including China, USA, Germany, Australia and Poland. This study is more comprehensive in terms of a global view of the conceptual and intellectual contours and network of actors on biochar-based smart fertilizers. Future research on the topic should be conducted more in the fields under farmers' conditions and may focus on (i) enrichment of biochar with nutrients from organic sources before its application to the soil, (ii) soil remediation and

Introduction
Efficient use of fertilizers is a key pillar for improving agricultural productivity and ensuring food security (1). Synthetic fertilizers are highly soluble and release their nutrients rapidly into the soil. But the nutrient requirements of crops are related to their vegetative stage, which is usually low in the initial stage (2). This most often results in a mismatch between crop nutrient requirements and synthetic fertilizer supply (3). Beig et al. (2) noted that when synthetic fertilizers are supplied to crops, they only use about 40-60% nitrogen (N), 15-20% phosphorus (P), and 50-60% potassium (K). Some of the nutrients not used by the plants are lost to the environment (4).
Nutrient losses represent a financial and energy loss for farmers. They contribute to reduced crop productivity, increased nutrient leaching, water and air pollution (5,6), and even ecosystem degradation. For example, the surplus of nitrogen is lost as volatilized ammonia that pollutes the air (4), nitrate leaches into groundwater and poses a great risk to human health (7,8), and nitrous oxide emitted into the air which is one of the main greenhouse gases in agriculture and responsible for global warming (9). Another part contributes with phosphorus to eutrophication of waters resulting in algal blooms and degradation of aquatic ecosystems (10). As for the excess of phosphorus, a part was fixed in the soil by creating a chemical bond with other minerals such as calcium, magnesium, aluminum, iron and zinc making these essential macronutrients and micronutrients unavailable for crop growth (11). The excess of potassium is lost primarily through leaching associated with water movement in the soil and surface runoff (12).
The low efficiency of synthetic fertilizers is therefore an obstacle to sustainable agricultural production (13). Judicious use of mineral fertilizers is essential to preserve the environment, increase food production, and feed the world's estimated 9.7 billion people by 2050 (14). Then, there is an urgent need to develop a sustainable and environmentally friendly method of delivering nutrients to the soil (2). One of such alternatives is the use of smart fertilizers which through their slow or controlled release mechanism make nutrients available according to crop needs (15,16). Smart fertilizers are a solution to improve food production while preserving environmental quality (17). They are also referred to as slow-or controlled-release fertilizers (15,18), ecologically smart fertilizers (15), environmentally friendly fertilizers (19), slow-release ecological fertilizers (20), or improved efficiency fertilizers (21).
From a circular economy perspective, Calabi-Floody et al. (17) suggested that smart fertilizers should be based on the innovative recycling and use of crop residues such as biochar.
Biochar is a microporous product, rich in recalcitrant carbon and obtained by thermochemical decomposition of organic matter in an oxygen-limited environment (22). The application of biochar to soils is currently being considered as a way to mitigate climate change by sequestering carbon while improving soil properties and functions (23). Through its dark color, biochar alters soil thermal dynamics and facilitates rapid crop germination (24). Application of biochar (i) promotes crop growth and productivity (25), (ii) improves soil water-holding capacity (26), (iii) reduces crop disease incidence (27,28), (iv) limits heavy metal bioavailability (29), (v) reduces nitrous oxide emissions from the soil (30), and (vi) reduces nutrient leaching losses (31,32), which can reduce fertilizer requirements. Studies have developed several biochar-based fertilizers (33) considered as smart fertilizers (16,34). In this paper, biochar-based fertilizers are referred to as biochar-based smart fertilizers.
Previous studies have synthesized the articles published on biochar-based fertilizers but none of them used the concept of smart fertilizers. Some of them presented the different formulations and methods to produce biochar-based fertilizers and their effect on soil and crops (35-38). Melo et al. (39) reported that biochar-based fertilizers increased crop productivity by 10% over fertilized controls and by 186% over absolute controls. However, this review focused on synthetic fertilizers without including organic fertilizers, which can be used in the manufacture of biochar-based smart fertilizers. In addition to inorganics, biochar-based fertilizers, other works have explored the biochar-based organic fertilizers and their effects on soil as well as crop productivity (40, 41). Wang et al. (42) noted that the combination of organic fertilizer including compost with biochar can increase crop productivity by 48% compared to fertilized controls. In Benin, maize yield was improved by 55% with biochar-based organic fertilizer over the control in various agroecological zones (43). So far, none of the reviews published explored the conceptual and intellectual structures of the knowledge generated from biochar-based smart fertilizers (e.g., authors, countries, institutions, topics). Understanding this structure is fundamental to (i) explain the paradigms that have guided/influenced research on biochar-based smart fertilizers as well as their evolution, (ii) appreciate the productivity and impact of authors that worked on the topic (44), and (iii) map the scientific knowledge generated in order to establish a solid foundation for advancing knowledge on biocharbased smart fertilizers (45). Bibliometric analysis is an appropriate research method to provide a comprehensive overview and classification of research, as well as to further develop emerging areas of research (46). Based on citation mapping, bibliometric analysis can quantitatively synthesize a research topic and provide an overview of the main research directions (47). This bibliometric review aims to (1) address the state of the arts of biochar-based smart fertilizers, (2) identify knowledge gaps, (3) describe emerging ideas and open new avenue for biochar-based nutrient cycling in circular economy and to find practical solutions to high prices mineral fertilizer in the context of war between Ukraine and Russia. Bibliometric analysis is a well-accepted and used scientific method which combines mathematical and statistical techniques to evaluate research (48).

Criteria for the selection of publications
For this bibliometric review, selection of scientific publications was made by predefining our population, intervention and outcome (PIO) according to the PIO protocol, a modification of the Population, Intervention, Comparator and Outcome (PICO) protocol, which is a search tool for reviews (49, 50). The components of the PIO protocol allow to set the criteria for including or not including an article in the review and to formulate the search equation for data collection (51). Thus, our population was crop production studies; the intervention was biochar-based smart fertilizer application (with organic or mineral) and the outcomes were crop yield or crop productivity, soil properties, and environmental quality. The keywords and search equation were formulated from these three components of the PIO model. To ensure that the papers selected were articles, we added a filter to exclude review articles.

Data collection strategy
We searched for titles of publications, abstract and keywords of the Scopus database. Scopus is one of the largest and most comprehensive databases providing access to documents with a large number of references and citations (52) on several disciplines including agriculture and environment. We used the following search equation: (TITLE-ABS-KEY (biochar) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (compost* OR co-compost* OR fertili?er OR "nutrient" OR "Biochar-based fertili?er" OR "slow release" OR "controlled release" OR "smart fertili?er") AND TITLE-ABS-KEY ("crop yield" OR "crop productivit*" OR "Soil propert*" OR environment*) AND NOT TITLE-ABS-KEY (review OR "quantitative review" OR synthesis OR bibliometric OR scientometric OR "Systematic map" OR "meta-analysis" OR "State of the art" OR "Current topics in" OR "Progress in" OR "Advances in" OR "Critical survey" OR "Comprehensive survey") AND (EXCLUDE (DOCTYPE, "re")). The search for publications was performed on 14.08.2022 and was not updated during this work. A total of 2779 scientific publications were identified, covering the period from 2007 to 2022. The metadata exported per publication were: • Citation information (authors, document title, year, source title, volume, issue, page, number of citations, source and document title, publication stage, DOI) • Bibliographic information (affiliations, series identifiers, publishers, source short title) • Abstract and keywords (abstract, author's keywords, index keywords) • Funding details (sponsor, funding text) • Other information (Include references) To override the 2,000 publications upload limit in Scopus, the files were uploaded in two batches, from 2007 to 2019 and from 2020 to 2022, so that each batch did not exceed the 2,000 publications. The publications were exported in BibTeX and RIS formats to form our collection for further processing and analysis.

Data analysis
The metadata collected were analyzed to extract potential knowledge from the scientific literature. The results were visualized using the Bibliometrix package (53)  o " convert2df " to convert the files into a data table; o " mergeDbSources " with the option " remove.duplicated " to remove the possible duplicates; o " saveRDS " to save the bibliographic data table in " rds " format for import and use in biblioshiny.
The metadata were analyzed to extract potential knowledge contained in the scientific literature.
To understand the intellectual structure of knowledge on biochar fertilizers, it is necessary to conduct a document analysis to identify the quantity and authority of the literature cited. In addition, to better understand the research trend on biochar smart fertilizers, the keywords in the index were analyzed. To avoid duplicates, the same ones with different spellings of words separated by dashes or written in capital letters were grouped together. For example, "maize and Zea mays" or "manure and manures" or "biochar, biochars and bio-char". Also, words such as "article" or "na" were removed as they do not provide any information about the content.
Bibliometric linkage was performed to analyze the documents, authors and nature of the scientific debates on biochar-based smart fertilizers. When at least one cited source appears in the bibliographic references of two papers, the two papers are said to be bibliographically coupled (53).
Thematic evolution shows the changes of keywords over time. It helps to analyze and identify the most relevant research themes and also provides insight into the future direction (57). It also helps to identify the most recent issues related to the topic being studied (58). According to Velasco-Muñoz et al. (59), thematic evolution is a major strategy for providing a historical perspective of research and providing a scientifi c model focused on future research directions.
Two articles are co-cited when both are cited together in a third article. The co-citation analysis establishes the relationship between articles based on the frequency with which they are co-cited together (60). Referenced citations were set to a minimum of 5 times and 50 articles from our collection were considered (61). Each node indicates a reference and the size illustrates the normalized number of citations received by the articles.
A collaboration network indicates how authors or countries come together to work in a particular field (62). A minimum threshold of 50 authors was set and the size of the ellipse indicates the number of publications by an author or country. The intensity of collaboration is measured by the thickness of the line and the spacing of the circles. The number of papers published by authors representing two or more countries determines the total strength of a country's relationship.
A brief narrative synthesis was added to the bibliometric review to highlight the role of biochar in agriculture, particularly its effects on soil and crops. The narrative synthesis was based on the most cited documents locally (n=25) and globally (N=25). Of these 50 most cited documents, 17 documents were found to be common between the most cited locally and globally. A total of 33 most cited documents were mined for the narrative synthesis section. As studies on biochar have been carried out in several countries and under different experimental conditions, it is essential to establish a baseline to facilitate comparison between the different papers. Therefore, for each study and depending on the availability of data, the magnitude of the effect of biochar on crops was calculated by dividing the value of the biochar treatments by the value of the control treatment.

Main information about the collection
In this study, the available knowledge on biochar-based smart fertilizers for sustainable agricultural production was mapped ( Table 1). A total of 2,779 articles were published within the period 2007 to 2022 (15 years). These documents contain 126,798 references and each document is cited 27.71 times on average. This showing that they documents are well appreciated in scientific works. The keywords, automatically generated by an algorithm from the references citation in the documents are almost double of the authors' keywords (10694 out of 5703) confirming that they are more informative than the authors' keywords (63,64). The total   (66). Thus, this has favored the citations of scientific research on biochar-based smart fertilizers between 2007 and 2010 in the perspective of finding solutions to increase agricultural production. On the other hand, the decrease observed from 2011 to August 2022 can be explained by the fact that similar publications have grown considerably in recent years or that a few articles have contributed considerably to this volume of information. This indicates that biochar-based smart fertilizers developed rapidly in the beginning but slowed down later due to low novelty in the subsequent research work (61). The most cited paper during the 15-year study period was from (67) entitled "Reversibility of soil productivity decline with organic matter of differing quality along a degradation gradient". This article alone had 262 citations. This shows that it is a pioneer article and has strongly influenced the development of biochar-based smart fertilizers. The highest value of average total citations per article was 304.

Source impact
The most influential sources on biochar-based smart fertilizers were reported here. The papers in the collection were published in 482 sources. Table 2 illustrates the 25 most influential sources based on five indicators (H-index, G-index, M-index, total citations, and number of publications). All three (indexes) are discussed in the literature (68-70). Among the 25 most influential sources, eight started publications in 2010. According to the collection in this study, the number of publication sources increased from 1 in 2007 to 23 in 2010. Hence, the sources that started publishing in 2010 have more influenced the development of biochar-based smart fertilizers. As a reminder, 2010 is a year following the severe food crisis and oil price hikes (66). Figure 2 shows the top ten most cited sources in the collection. The source of the chemosphere journal was locally most cited (4,283) followed by the soil biology and biochemistry (4,244); while environmental pollution was the tenth with 1,578 local citations.

Most impactful authors
The analysis of the authors' performance is necessary to evaluate their contribution to the evolution of the theme studied.  Table 3). On this list, the 5th author, (Li Y) published 69 papers while the 1st author (Ok Y S) published 30. The 3rd author (Zhang X) had 2,333 total citations while the 2nd author (Wang H) had 1,388. Figure 3 completes these observations by displaying the scientific production of the authors through the number of papers per year. Per author, the line indicates the chronology of author's publications, the size of the bubble is proportional to the number of papers and the intensity of the color is related to the number of citations per year. Although it is accepted that the number of publications is a proxy for the author's productivity and the total number of citations is a proxy for the author's impact (45), in this study neither the total number of citations nor the number of publications can satisfactorily rank the authors. Su et al. (71), reported that the number of publications does not represent   Top ten of most locally cited sources on biochar-based smart fertilizers.
highly cited articles because there were several factors that influence the citation of an article. For example, the accessibility of the article (free or paid); the language of publication.
The use of indicators that combine citation and number of publications to evaluate the performance of authors is necessary. H-index is calculated on the principle that h articles are cited at least h times (68). G-index is determined on the principle that an academic has published at least g articles that, combined, have received at least the square of g (69). M-index divides H-index by the number of years during a scientist has been active (70). This shows that G-index and M-index are variants of H-index. The prioritization of the top 25 authors list is focused on G-index. The rationale for this choice is that it is an indicator for assessing the quality of scientific output (72). It also accurately indicates the author's scientific contribution and success (73). However, H-index is not suitable for comparing interdisciplinary fields (74). Table 4 shows the top 25 cited documents on biochar-based smart fertilizers. These papers were ranked in descending order of global citations (GC) received (Table 4A) or local citations received (Table 4B). According to (61), global citations (GC) represent the number of total citations that an article in a collection has received from indexed documents on a bibliographic database (Dimensions, Scopus, WoS, Lens, etc…). Thus, the global citations take into account the citations received by a document throughout the scientific world. The same authors defined local citations as the number of times that an author (or a document) included in a collection has been cited by other documents in the same collection. Thus, the term local is related to the sphere of the collection, i.e. the set of documents exported from a bibliographic database as part of a study. In the top 25 cited papers on biochar-based smart fertilizers, the overall citations range from 330 to 870 (Table 4A) Figure 4 illustrates the top fifteen most used keywords on the theme. The occurrence of the words is their frequency of appearance. Thus, keywords such as biochar (2,670), soil (2,195), charcoal (2,153), fertilizer (1,115) and manures (902) were mostly used. The words "biochar" and "charcoal" were not treated as synonyms because biochar is produced through pyrolysis in the absence of oxygen while charcoal is produced through carbonization (22). For example, several studies have explored the potential use of hydrochar in agriculture (104, 105). Hydrochar and biochar show different physicochemical properties that significantly affect their potential application (106). The use of the words "fertilizer" and "manures" alongside biochar and charcoal indicates that smart fertilizers based on biochar or charcoal are made from both synthetic mineral fertilizers and organic fertilizers and are applied to the soil to feed crops. However, it should be noted that less research has been done on combining biochar with nutrients from organic sources (manure) than on combining Top twenty-five authors' production over time on biochar-based smart fertilizers. biochar with nutrients from synthetic fertilizers. On the top 15 keywords, there were two macronutrients namely nitrogen (813) and phosphorus (542) that often appeared. We can deduce that the works related to smart fertilizers based on biochar have more explored the (efficient) use of these two macronutrients by the crops, especially nitrogen. One of the main crops that has received more attention from the studies was maize with 503 occurrences. The effect of biochar-based smart fertilizers on soil pollution (548) was also discussed in the literature. The appearance of controlled study (498) among the 15 most frequent keywords indicates that there are more researches in controlled environments on this topic. As a complement to Figures 4, 5 presents the word cloud (minimum 100 keywords). The thickness of a word illustrates its frequency. The thicker words are the most used and the thinner words are less frequent. Figure 6 shows a scientific mapping that reveals the most essential papers (impact, horizontal axis) and how they are related (centrality, vertical axis). The unit of analysis was documents. The top 300 documents were selected from our collection of 2,779 with a minimum of 10% clustered linkage  Top fifteen most relevant words on biochar-based smart fertilizers.  The green cluster (3) had a centrality of 0.335 with an impact of 2.728 and 62 papers including Domingues (110), Adekiya (111) and Akhtar (112). The normalized local citations of these top 3 papers were 12.28; 10.6 and 5.55 respectively. This cluster is located in the lower left quadrant. These papers are therefore less essential and less related to our topic on biochar-based smart fertilizers. However, they may include the emerging terms useful to our topic (58, 62).

Bibliometric coupling of documents
The red cluster (4) had a centrality of 0.308; an impact of 2.952 and 78 papers including Oladele (113) with 16.27 normalized local citations followed by Cooper (114) with 6.99 normalized local citations and Trupiano (115) with 4.27 normalized local citations. Word cloud of the top 100 most frequents keywords on biochar-based smart fertilizers. Clusters by documents coupling.
Abiola et al. 10.3389/fsoil.2023.1136327 It is placed in the top left quadrant. These papers are related to the topic under study but are less essential (low impact). Figure 7 presents the evolution of the 250 most used words in the literature on biochar-based smart fertilizers following the cooccurrence network. Based, on the evolution of publications, three years were set as cut-off points. These are 2013, 2017 and 2021. The size of the bars indicates the frequency with which the keywords appeared and the color helps to distinguish the keywords. From 2007 to 2013, the most commonly used keywords in search engines for biochar-based smart fertilizers were "charcoal," "soil," "biochar," and "controlled study." From 2014 to 2017, the word "soil" disappeared and "chemistry" was the new word appearing in the literature. "Chemistry" is related to three words from the earlier period, namely "controlled study", "biochar", and "soil". "Chemistry" has a strong association with "controlled study", as indicated by the width of the band connecting the two words. (Figure 7). This means that during 2014-2017, there were several controlled studies related to "biochar", "chemistry" and "soil". But, during 2018-2021, the keyword "charcoal" was used in most studies and was merged into "biochar" in the next period. "Microbial activity" is a keyword that emerged spontaneously without the contribution of other words. Thus, studies on "biochar" and "soil microbiology" emerged. In August 2022, "manure" and "soil pollution" were two keywords that suddenly appear for the first time in the thematic evolution. The branch of "manure" comes from "charcoal" in the period 2018-2021, and the branch of "soil pollution" comes from "chemistry" and "biochar". This suggests that since "manure" is an organic source of nutrients, studies are currently being done to utilize it in the production of nutrient-rich charcoal, a variant of biochar-based smart fertilizers. Also, the link between "chemistry" in the previous period and "soil pollution" in August 2022 reflects that research is currently focused on soil pollution by chemicals such as herbicides and heavy metals. The current main research axes are "soil pollution", "biochar", "manure", "charcoal", and "microbial community".

Co-citation network analysis
The co-citation network analysis was performed and is shown in Figure 8. Three clusters were identified and were represented in different colors (cluster red: 1; cluster blue: 2; cluster green: 3). Nodes of the same color are part of the same cluster. Each box was labeled with the first author of the article and the year of publication. The main ideas of these clusters can be considered as the theoretical foundations (61) of all the work that has been done on biochar-based smart fertilizers. Table 5 summarizes the top 5 authors of the three clusters from the co-citation network. The number of articles constituting the clusters has been specified and each cluster is characterized by the parameters betweenness, closeness and PageRank. Betweness presents information about the role played by the authors in a network, while closeness indicates the ability of nodes to efficiently transport information by being closer to other nodes in the network and PageRank is an indicator of the prestige of publications that have influence on the research domain. A publication with a high PageRank is considered to be of high quality and therefore a "must cite" among highly cited publications. For example, in cluster 1, Atkinson (116) is the highest quality publication (PageRank=0.048), followed by Jeffery et al. (23) and Biederman and Harpole (117). The main idea of these authors in cluster 1 is the variation of biochar effect with environment (soil and climate). In cluster 2, the publication with the high quality is with Lehmann (118) (PageRank=0.023) followed by Cantrell (121) and Keiluweit (122). These authors indicated that the physicochemical characteristics of biochar vary depending on the nature of the organic material used and the temperature of pyrolysis. In cluster 3, Lehmann (123) (PageRank=0.025) is the highest quality publication followed by Chan (124) and Lehmann (126). These authors pointed to the role of biochar in improving the nutrient use efficiency of plants and reducing leaching losses. These three main ideas form the theoretical basis for research on biochar-  In the collaboration between authors, 4 clusters emerged (cluster red: 1; cluster blue: 2; cluster green: 3; cluster purple: 4). Wang Y (cluster red), Zhang X (cluster blue), Rizwan M (cluster green), Zhao L (cluster purple) have the highest betweenness per cluster, respectively. These authors are therefore closer to each. They are therefore more collaborative in their cluster. In the authors' collaboration network, Wang Y (cluster red), Zhang Y (cluster red), Li Y (cluster red), Zhang X (cluster blue) and Liu X (cluster blue) are the five most collaborative authors.

Network for authors' collaboration and countries
In the network of collaboration between countries, the five countries with more collaboration are respectively China (betweenness=338.35), USA (betweenness=151.70), Australia (betweenness=133.05), Germany (betweenness=128.31) and Poland (betweenness=48.91). The African countries involved in the network have a low betweenness: Egypt (2.05); Ethiopia (0.19); Ghana (0) and Nigeria (0). This shows little or no collaboration between these countries and the network of researchers on biocharbased smart fertilizers. The 5 top countries with more impact in the collaboration network were China (PageRank=0.151); USA (PageRank=0.072); Australia (PageRank=0.067); Germany (PageRank=0.630) and Pakistan (PageRank=0.058).

Impacts of biochar on crops and soils
Biochar is produced from a variety of feedstocks. These include crop residues, wood waste, food waste, paper waste, sewage sludge, wastewater sludge, green waste, and manure ( Table 6). The yield and physicochemical properties of biochar depend on the pyrolysis temperature (127). The cation exchange capacity (CEC) and organic carbon (OC) content of biochar decreased with increasing pyrolysis temperature, while, the pH, ash content, and specific   83) reported that the type of feedstock used to produce biochar has a great effect on crop response to biochar application. Biochar is applied alone or in combination with nutrient sources. It is used as a greenhouse gas negative technology and has fewer drawbacks (87). The most commonly used nutrient source to enrich biochar is mineral fertilizers (75, 78, 81-84, 86, 88, 93, 97, 100, 101). However, a few papers have investigated the enrichment of biochar with nutrients from organic sources such as compost (77,98,99) and manure (26,31,95). Moreso, Agegnehu et al. (102); Agegnehu et al. (91) used both mineral fertilizer and compost to enrich biochar with nutrients before application to soil.
Biochar exhibits several effects on both crops and soils (Table 6). In general, biochar improves crop growth (height, leaf area and leaf chlorophyll content) and yield, but in some cases no effect was found on crop yield (100). When effect was significant, the average yield increases range from 1.2 times (80) to 8.6 times (84) with an average of 2.3 times compared to the control treatment. These values depend on the experimental conditions (field, pot or greenhouse). Haider et al. (100) found that the same biochar in the same soil had a positive effect on crop yield under greenhouse conditions and no effect on crop yield under field conditions. This suggests that results from studies in controlled environments such as greenhouses or pots cannot be accurately extrapolated to field applications. One reason that may explain this discrepancy is the difference in environmental conditions between the greenhouse and the field. According to Rajkovich et al. (83), the environmental conditions in the field may be more conducive to nutrients leaching than in greenhouse.
Biochar application also affects soil physicochemical properties including bulk density (BD), soil electrical conductivity (EC), saturated hydraulic conductivity (SHC), soil organic carbon (SOC), pH and cation exchange capacity (CEC), and nutrient uptake ( Table 6). Biochar application increases xylem sap flow in some cases (78). Moreover, Biochar helps remediate contaminated soils by reducing the bioavailability and phytotoxicity of heavy metals (29,93). Through its adsorptive capacity, biochar enhances the immobilization of heavy metals (90) and their subsequent removal (76). The adsorption capacity of biochar in soil increases with increasing soil temperature, pH, contact time, and ammonium concentration (95). The smaller the particle size of biochar, the higher its adsorption capacity (95). Because of this adsorption capacity, nutrient-loaded or enriched biochar can act as a slowrelease fertilizer in agriculture to improve soil fertility (32) thereby increase crop productivity. In addition, biochar stimulates nitrification and denitrification processes (94) and the abundance of nitrous oxide-reducing bacteria (88). It can also facilitates the abundance of plant growth promoting and/or biocontrol of microbes (81).

Logical implications of research on biochar-based smart fertilizers
Research on biochar indicates the importance of this material that overlaps several fields and purposes (128). Biochar application contributes to carbon sequestration, soil fertility enhancement, pollution remediation, and organic waste recycling (120). When applied alone or in combination with mineral or organic fertilizers, biochar improves soil properties, fertilizer use efficiency and crop yields (129). It also reduces toxicity in the root zone of crops (130). The role of soil amendment and the interaction of biochar with nutrients are two fundamental steps in the development of biocharbased fertilizers (129). Because of their diverse role, Biochar-based fertilizers are an effective means of providing nutrients to crops and increasing soil carbon stocks (131). This explains the growing research trends on Biochar and the diversity of feedstocks used  for its production. There are several methods of biochar's production which can be grouped into three (3) categories: a. Direct treatment: this involves using nutrient-rich feedstocks to produce biochar. Nutrient volatilization is reduced through slow pyrolysis at low temperatures. Indicative temperatures are 300-400°C for nitrogen (40) and 700°C for phosphorus and potassium (117). Various nutrient-rich feedstocks can been used to produce biochar. For example, swine manure (132,133), poultry litter (133), and human feces (134) with nutrient contents of 1.6-4.8% for nitrogen, 4.0-7.7% for phosphorus and 1.9-5.8% for potassium. b. Pre-treatment: the feedstock is enriched with nutrients prior to pyrolysis. For example, mineral fertilizers, animal wastes, or other nutrient-rich materials can be used to treat the feedstocks. This method has the advantage of facilitating the addition of one or more nutrients to the biochar, depending on the nutrient sources used (40). Pretreatment can be done by impregnation or co-pyrolysis (129,135,136) with high nutrient content of the resulting biochar-based fertilizer. c. Post-treatment: biochar is produced and then processed with a nutrient-rich source (compost, manure, mineral fertilizer, etc…) at room or controlled temperature. This method is nearly used in 60% of biochar nutrient enrichment studies (40). Post-treatment can include encapsulation (129);, granulation (137), blending (138), and coating (138,139). Nutrient sources commonly used are mineral fertilizers (139), crushed rock or wastewater (40), vermicompost leachate (131) and pig manure compost (140). In this category, there are also enriched biochars that are specifically designed to retain heavy metals from the soil (e.g. 136,141). This allows for the simultaneous slow release of nitrogen, and cadmium (Cd) immobilization in soil and toxicity reduction in plants.
Biochar-based smart fertilizers are a good alternative to both enrich the biochar with nutrients and reduce the amount of biochar applied to the soil and investment costs (40, 137). In direct treatment and pre-treatment methods, pyrolysis temperature is a critical factor (40)). It is essential to control the temperature to maintain an acceptable concentration of feedstock nutrients. While a temperature of 300°C is recommended for pre-purification of nitrogen (40), a temperature of about 700°C is recommended for better preservation of phosphorus and postassium (117). This temperature variability does not allow the simultaneous preservation of the three macronutrients (N, P, and K) during pyrolysis. The production of biochar-based smart fertilizers from the post-treatment method is technically simpler (142) and can be easily adopted by farmers. In addition, the ratio of biochar and macronutrient content can be easily controlled (41). This method is more suitable for farmers who want to produce their biochar-based fertilizer locally.

Knowledge gaps and future research pursuits
After mapping the available knowledge on biochar-based smart fertilizers and describing the intellectual and social structures of this knowledge, some research gaps can be identified. The analysis of the keywords revealed that in the enrichment of biochar with nutrients, organic fertilizers are less used. Since small farmers produce and use manure or compost themselves, it might be easier for them to introduce biochar into these usual amendments in order to obtain the biochar-based smart fertilizers. Therefore, research exploring the enrichment of biochar with organic nutrients sources prior to application to the soil is worth considering. This is all the more urgent in view of the soaring prices of inorganic fertilizers internationally for various reasons including the covid-19 pandemic and the war between Russia and Ukraine.
In addition, the keyword analysis on biochar-based smart fertilizers discussed the benefits of these fertilizers to the soil, crops and the environment, including mitigation of global warming. There are almost no keywords specifying the economic costs and benefits of these fertilizers for farmers. However, in addition to the technical and environmental benefits of an innovation, the cost of acquisition is a key factor enabling beneficiaries to implement it. Future work on smart fertilizers biochar-based should integrate the economic profitability for farmers. In addition to the enrichment of biochar with nutrients from organic sources, the thematic evolution revealed that soil microbiology and soil pollution/remediation in relation to biochar are the key areas on which work is currently focused.
Also, in the keyword analysis and thematic evolution, the term "controlled study" emerged a major area to focus on. This illustrates that several works on biochar-based smart fertilizers are conducted in a controlled environment. Research on leaching or nutrient leaching is mostly conducted in column tanks in controlled environment (143,144). However, a soil reconstituted in a column cannot have the same properties as a soil in a real environment. Studies in the open environment under farmers' conditions will be useful to confirm or deny the advantages of biochar-based smart fertilizers. Finally, from the analysis of the collaboration networks between countries working on biocharbased smart fertilizers, there are only 4 African countries in the top 50. Two countries in North Africa including Egypt and Ethiopia have a low level of research collaboration with all the countries working on the topic. Nigeria and Ghana from West Africa and their collaboration with other countries on the theme is nil. A recent work on the topic was published in Benin on profitability and agronomic potential of cotton under biochar-compost-based amendments which showed high return on investment compared with biochar and mineral fertilizer alone (36). It is necessary to initiate research projects involving collaboration between African countries and other countries, especially, countries that form more bridges in the network. These include China, USA, Australia, Germany and Poland. For example, sandwich thesis grants requiring collaboration between these major countries and Africa could be a solution. Such collaboration will increase the variability of available data on biochar-based smart fertilizers and may evolve current theoretical frameworks.

Conclusion
Biochar-based smart fertilizers are an option for sustainable soil fertility management of agricultural land. They improve nutrient use efficiency in crops, reduce nutrient losses and preserve ecosystems. Based on the mapping of current scientific knowledge on biochar-based smart fertilizers, this study established a foundation for further advancement of the topic. The results showed that the theoretical framework of the scientific knowledge on the subject is based on 3 axes: (i) the effect of biochar on crops depends on pedoclimatic conditions, (ii) the physico-chemical characteristics of biochar. Its quality vary according to the nature of the organic matter used and the temperature of pyrolysis and (iii) the biochar makes it possible to improve the efficiency of nutrient use and the reduction of their losses through leaching. The threshold and direction of variability of these three axes are relevant perspectives to unify ideas in the form of biochar-based smart fertilizer law. The most cited source in our collection of 2,779 scientific publications is Chemosphere. The paper "Maize yield and nutrition for 4 years after biochar application in a Colombian oxisol savanna" by Major et al. (75), is the most cited. It has more impact both in our collection and globally on biochar-based smart fertilizers. China is the country with the highest collaboration in the network of countries and authors working on the topic. The two West African countries in the network have no collaboration with the network although they have potential. Some works are now picking up in French speaking countries particularly in Benin and Burkina Faso. However, two papers on the topic are recently published in 2021 and 2022 in Benin. Research projects encouraging African countries to collaborate with the main countries working on the theme are essential to reverse the trend. Finally, the work on biochar in relation to organic sources of nutrients, soil microbiology and soil sanitation are current topics in the scientific debate on biochar-based smart fertilizers. Research on these themes is welcome from African countries to minimize dependency on mineral fertilizers.

Author contributions
WA, RD, and PT contributed to conception and design of the study. WA organized the database and performed the analysis. WA wrote the first draft of the manuscript. RD, PT and WA wrote sections of the manuscript. WA, AM and AS contributed to fund acquisition and review. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.

Funding
This research was funded by The Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH through the Project of Soil Protection and Rehabilitation to improve Food Security in Benin (ProSOL).