Dark blue-green: Cave-inhabiting cyanobacteria as a model for astrobiology

Subterranean environments on Earth serve as an analog for the study of microbes on other planets, which has become an active area of research. Although it might sound contradictory that photosynthetic cyanobacteria thrive in extreme low light environments, they are frequent inhabitants of caves on Earth. Throughout the phylum these cyanobacteria have developed unique adaptations that cannot only be used for biotechnological processes but also have implications for astrobiology. They can, for example, both accommodate for the low light conditions by producing specific pigments that allow photosynthesis in near-infrared (IR) radiation/far-red light, and they can synthesize bioplastic compounds and calcium carbonate sheaths which represent valuable resources during human colonization of other planets or rock bodies. This article will highlight the potential benefits of cave-inhabiting cyanobacteria and will present a suitable bioreactor technique for the utilization of these special microbes during future space missions.


Introduction
For human colonies to be installed on currently unhabitable planets preparation of the area of interest is crucial (Levchenko et al., 2021). Creating such an enclosed space where humans can operate under preferred conditions -also known as the biosphere-is likely not achievable on large scales, but will need to be achieved gradually. As an initial step, this includes a breathable atmosphere with a constant supply of oxygen, a moderate temperature range and protection from cosmic rays. At a later stage, resources are needed for the construction, maintenance of the colonies and food production. All of this must include a sustainable, circular low-waste concept, most preferably based on resources from the planet of interest (Ceylan, 2018;Santo, 2022). In the past, the concept of natural caves has been used as a test scenario for colonizing extraterrestrial environments (Walden et al., 1998). Caves on Mars, for example, would not only be shielded from damaging ionizing and UV radiation, but also offer protection against small-scale meteorite impacts (e. g., Walden et al., 1998), and extreme weather conditions such as the dust storms that typically affect the Martian surface (Ryan and Sharman, 1981;Viúdez-Moreiras et al., 2019). These subterranean environments could protect astronauts during early human missions to other planets and could act as primary producers creating hospitable biospheres.
While Mars contains large and interconnected cave systems across the planet (Cushing et al., 2007;Sauro et al., 2020), the Earth's Moon is well known for its craters and lunar tubes (Chappaz et al., 2017;Kaku et al., 2017). Such pit craters, formed from the collapsed ceilings of subsurface void spaces such as natural caves or lava tubes, have been detected on almost every rock body within the inner Solar System (Wyrick et al., 2004;Haruyama et al., 2009;Davey et al., 2013;Titus et al., 2021): so far, approximately 2,660 subsurface access points have been cataloged on Solar System bodies (Titus et al., 2021), and since the discovery of the first caves on Mars, the spacecraft NASA's robotic Mars Odyssey Orbiter has helped identify over 1,000 probable gaps on the Red Planet that have been compiled into the Mars Global Cave Candidate Catalog, also known as the MGC (Cushing, 2017). Recently it has been shown that some of the lunar pits and caves provide a temperature around 17°C with a stable and safe thermal environment for long-term exploration and habitation of the Moon (Horvath et al., 2022;Rodeghiero et al., 2022). In addition, the ultraviolet radiation environment and shielding in pit craters and cave skylights on Mars can now be reliably modeled and demonstrated the protective character of such subterranean environments (Viúdez-Moreiras et al., 2021). Studying caves on Earth could thus support the prediction of conditions in cavities on other planets or rock bodies (Sauro et al., 2019;Sauro et al., 2020).
Lava tunnels and cave-like structures have been observed with the use of Mars satellite imaging and special measuring tools. They have been generally considered as suitable environments to search for life and biomarkers (Léveillé and Datta, 2010). However, photosynthetic bacteria such as cyanobacteria are one of the most promising cave-inhabitants in this context. They have evolved on Earth 3.5 mya (Sanchez- Baracaldo and Cardona, 2020;Hickman-Lewis et al., 2022) and are adapted to a wide range of environments, ranging from both hot and cold deserts (Friedmann, 1980;Wynn-Williams, 2000;Lacap-Bugler et al., 2017) with strong radiation (Rastogi et al., 2014) to high salinity habitats (Oren, 2015) and symbioses with lichens (Spribille et al., 2022) or plants (Rai et al., 2000). In addition, they have been proposed as suitable, multi-purpose microorganisms that are supportive during human missions to other planets including the selection of model strains (e.g., Ramalho et al., 2022). Researchers are able to not only isolate and grow them under artificial conditions, but also use them for large-scale industrial production of natural goods (Mutale-Joan et al., 2022). They are regularly found in high abundances and diversity in caves around the globe (Miscoe et al., 2016;Behrendt et al., 2020;Popović et al., 2020), possibly due to the relative constant conditions found in these habitats. In the following we review the suitability of cave-inhabiting cyanobacteria for colonization of other planets with a special emphasis on biotechnological aspects as demonstrated in Figures 1, 2. 2 Current challenges and new solutions for the efficient cultivation of cyanobacteria Before devising any new biotechnological application where cyanobacteria can be utilized -irrespectively whether on Earth or Potential of cave-inhabiting cyanobacteria as a model for astrobiology. Cyanobacteria from caves on Earth possess unique properties that make them great candidates for biotechnological applications during human colonization of other planets or the Earth's Moon. Using minimum resources they can be grown in emerse photo-bioreactors (ePBR) that produce an aerosol directed over surfaces of biocarriers on which the cyanobacterial biofilm establishes. This technique allows the manufacturing of important and yet in this context ignored products such as living building materials or bioplastic compounds.
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences frontiersin.org elsewhere-one needs to consider how cyanobacteria accumulate biomass and how these cultivation techniques need to be adapted. One of the major setbacks for cyanobacterial applications in industry as of today is the high amount of water used for submersed cultivations. During this process cyanobacterial biomass is, for example, cultivated in large open ponds filled with hundreds of liters of medium and stirred for several weeks under natural light conditions. To harvest biomass gained under these conditions, cells must be separated from the medium, resulting in poor biomass to water yields, usually of about <1% (w/v), and great amounts of wastewater that can hardly be recycled due to contaminations (Johnson et al., 2018). Moreover, most strains that are currently used in commercial approaches are aquatic cyanobacterial strains with a low acclimatization potential (e.g., artificial light and temperature regime in bioreactors) and from which only a few products can be derived, such as food supplements or pigments (Khalifa et al., 2021). However, there are also photobioreactors that were specifically designed to grow cyanobacteria as a life-support system on Mars (Verseux et al., 2021), but also these systems are based on submersed systems and were mostly tested for aquatic cyanobacterial strains.
A new biotechnological approach to cyanobacterial farming is the use of emerse -air exposed-biofilm photobioreactors (ePBRs; Figures  1, 2A), where only a little amount of aqueous medium is needed for aerosolization over cyanobacterial biofilms that grow immobilized on surfaces (Lakatos and Strieth, 2017;Scherer et al., 2022). This method is resource-friendly because the wetting of biofilms only with aerosols saves approximately 90% of water investment compared to submerse cultivation methods. Moreover, the energy consumption for dewatering in downstream processing can be up to 82 MJ per kg dry biomass (Chisti 2007;Jorquera et al., 2010;Ozkan et al., 2012). Consequently, the production of 1 kg biomass requires an energy input of 385 MJ kg −1 in a commercial tubular system and 9.18 MJ kg-1 in a raceway pond-both including mixing during cultivation (Chisti, 2007;Jorquera et al., 2010) while biofilm reactors only consume 4.7 MJ kg −1 because mixing and dewatering are no crucial process steps (Ozkan et al., 2012). In addition, in biofilm photobioreactors the cell density is up to 90 times higher in comparison to submerge technologies like open ponds or closed systems (Jorquera et al., 2010;Ozkan et al., 2012;Podola et al., 2017). Especially the ePBR-technology is suited for terrestrial cyanobacteria showing a much broader ecological spectrum in terms of light quantity and quality, pH, desiccation, temperature and other abiotic factors (Kuhne et al., 2014;Lakatos and Strieth 2017). Terrestrial cyanobacteria from e.g. biocrusts of arid deserts experience, for example, great temperature amplitudes as the soil heats up during the day and cools down at night and they need to be capable of using also short hydration events provided by, e.g., fog (Jung et al., 2019) while aquatic cyanobacteria constantly have a water supply and the water column has a constant temperature. Terrestrial cyanobacteria from caves could potentially not only photo-acclimatize towards the shifted light spectrum that we expect from other planets, but they could also be key to new products and materials created with the ePBR technology. Among these are for example induced calcification processes that result in so-called living building materials (LBMs) or bioplastic compounds among others ( Figure 1). Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences frontiersin.org

Ecology and benefits of caveinhabiting cyanobacteria for future applications
Cyanobacteria are the oldest living microorganisms capable of oxygenic photosynthesis on Earth and as a result, they are highly adapted to a wide range of environments (Chen et al., 2021). They are known to be pioneer organisms, capable of conquering new habitats and laying the foundation for whole ecosystems as primary producers and due to their ability of priming soils (Muñoz-Rojas et al., 2018;Chen et al., 2021). The Great Oxygenation Event during the Paleoproterozoic era demonstrated what photosynthetic microorganisms are capable of as this was the time interval when the Earth's atmosphere and the shallow ocean first experienced a rise in the amount of oxygen (Knoll and Nowak, 2017). This injection of toxic oxygen into an anaerobic biosphere probably caused the extinction of many existing anaerobic species present on Earth at that time (Hodgskiss et al., 2019).
It has been predicted that extra-terrestrial photosynthesis might be possible where an Earth-like atmosphere is present and water can be supplied (Lingam and Loeb, 2020). On planetary surfaces, several factors could impair cyanobacterial colonization (Verseux et al., 2016), although some highly resistant strains have already been discovered (Billi et al., 2022). Especially cyanobacteria from extreme terrestrial habitats on Earth have already been shown to be suitable candidates to not only survive travelling through Space , they could also grow under Space-and Mars-like conditions (de , and on Martian regolith (Baqué et al., 2013). In particular, Chroococcidiopsis sp. CCMEE 029 from the Negev desert has been extensively studied and reported to withstand years of desiccation and the exposure to space and Mars-like stimulations (Billi, 2009;Billi et al., 2019). Their ability to withstand such extremes is due to a great amplitude of mechanisms such as the formation of extra cellular polymeric substances (EPS) that provide physical protection and prevent desiccation (Rossi and De Philippis, 2015) and also a variety of pigments that increases their resistance against UV irradiation (Sinha and Häder, 2008).
In contrast, caves represent a protected habitat with reduced abiotic stressors such as high irradiance, UV/gamma radiation, desiccation, different contaminants and fast temperature variations, at the cost of limited light availability (Billi et al., 2022). On Earth, caves show high (cyano)bacterial diversity (Hauer et al., 2015;Popović et al., 2020;Prescott et al., 2022) and could represent suitable growth environments on other planetary bodies featuring relatable conditions (Wynne et al., 2021). These conditions are represented by a stable temperature regime, rough surface textures and constant as well as continuous humidity supplies provided by runoff-or seepage water ( Figures 2D, E). Karst areas are especially prone to form caves across the globe since the main component of limestone is calcium carbonate that easily gets dissolved by water. Such cave systems can be colonized by naturally occurring phototrophic microbial communities (Roldán and Hernández-Mariné, 2009) or their establishment can be induced by artificial lightning in touristic show caves, also known as Lampenflora (Mulec, 2019).
A common unicellular species of cyanobacteria in natural caves is Gloeobacter violaceus (Mareš et al., 2013; Figure 2C), representing one of the oldest lineages of modern cyanobacteria. The genus Gloeobacter is characterized by the lack of thylakoid membranes and the positioning of the photosynthetic machinery in the cytoplasmic membrane which makes it an interesting model for biotechnology and research on the origin of photosynthesis (Engqvist et al., 2015).
Other low-light adapted cyanobacteria from cave environments possess specialized chlorophylls, such as chlorophyll d and chlorophyll f, capable of absorbing far-red light in addition to visible light. The presence of far-red cyanobacteria as a consequence of the spectral shift towards longer wavelengths has been recently reported for cave systems (Behrendt et al., 2020). The ability to produce such pigments could allow the growth of cyanobacteria on planets and rock bodies exposed to different light spectra than Earth (Billi et al., 2022).
In addition, many filamentous cyanobacteria can be found in caves, some of which are well known to fix atmospheric nitrogen and to form calcium carbonate sheaths around their cells. Among the most prominent examples for such calcifying cyanobacteria are Geitleria spp. (Kilgore et al., 2018; Figure 2F) and Scytonema julianum (Couté and Bury, 1988; Figure 2B). Especially cells of the latter are encased with thick, well-developed calcified sheaths with external diameters of 11-25 μm, which develop through the sequential precipitation of amorphous CaCO 3 , acicular calcite crystals, triradiate calcite crystals, and dendrite calcite or aragonite crystals ( Figure 2F; Jones and Peng, 2014) with a high degree of mineral variability (Hoffmann, 1992). Employing such cyanobacteria in the biomineralization of carbon dioxide by calcium carbonate precipitation has been suggested to offer self-sustaining strategies for point-source carbon capture and sequestration in biotechnological processes (Jansson and Northen, 2010;Phillips et al., 2013).
Interestingly, a high proportion of cave inhabiting cyanobacterial taxa have recently been shown to produce biocompatible and biodegradable bioplastics e.g., polyhydroxyalkanoates such as polyhydroxybutyrate (PHA / PHB; Figure 2H) with various application potential (Djebaili et al., 2022). Cyanobacteria have minimal nutrient requirements for growth and accumulate PHAs and PHBs through oxygenic photosynthesis under nutrient-limited conditions, such as nitrogen and/or phosphate starvation, where cells enter a quiescent state known as chlorosis (Koch et al., 2020a).
Next to the production of oxygen, dietary supplement, dyes, and food, the mentioned aspects such as far-red adaptations, PHB production, calcification, and biotechnological advantages make cave-inhabiting cyanobacteria suitable and multifunctional candidates to study the requirements for life on other planets. more hospitable environment than the surface (Léveillé and Datta, 2010;Irwin and Schulze-Makuch, 2020). Further away from the Solar System, for habitable zone planetary conditions, the light spectrum emitted by M-stars (red dwarfs), albeit red-shifted compared to the Sun, could sustain oxygenic photosynthesis in cyanobacteria (Claudi et al., 2020), as could K-stars (Covone et al., 2021).
Cyanobacteria can modulate their photosynthetic activity according to light spectral distribution via several different processes designated chromatic acclimation (CA) (Sanfilippo et al., 2019). Some species, in response to FR light enriched exposure, show a CA called Far-Red Light Photoacclimation (FaRLiP). This process induces profound changes in the composition of photosystems, antennae and chlorophyll content, by synthesizing chl f and chl d ( Figure 2G) in addition to chl a (Gan et al., 2014). Even if in FR acclimated cells chl f constitutes only about 12% of the total chlorophyll content, it is not only an accessory pigment, but it is instead present in both photosystems and it is directly involved in charge separation (Nürnberg et al., 2018). In contrast, in most species of the genus Acaryochloris where chl d represents the primary photopigment, photosynthetic use of FR light is a constitutive and more restrictive adaptation than FaRLiP (Wolf and Blankenship, 2019;Viola et al., 2022).
FR light adaptations allow cyanobacterial growth in widespread ecological niches, including caves, lakes, beach rock, deserts, hot spring mats, and subtropical forests (Antonaru et al., 2020). Cave light gradients can be considered, on a much bigger scale, comparable to vertical micro-gradients observed in biofilms, desert crusts or endolithic habitats, where the upper layers absorb the visible component, while FR light penetrates into deeper layers. Both cave-and micro gradient-induced FR light enrichment lead to a substantial increase in the growth of FR-adapted cyanobacteria (Behrendt et al., 2012;Behrendt et al., 2020;Kühl et al., 2020).
Far-red adaptations could then give cyanobacteria a crucial advantage in space biology applications, on the surface but especially in caves. For instance, direct light emitted by M-stars allows the growth of FaRLiP and chl d dependent cyanobacteria with little advantage over non-FR adapted strains (Ritchie et al., 2018;Claudi et al., 2020). In fact, while in those conditions Acaryochloris potential productivity estimate has been considered the highest among other commonly (or widely) used oxygenic phototrophs (e.g., 0.178 vs. 0.155 g C m −2 h −1 in Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942; Ritchie et al., 2018), a major drawback of FaRLiP strains is that they show reduced growth rates if they are cultivated exclusively under far-red light (Claudi et al., 2020). For Leptolyngbya sp. JSC-1, for example, it was shown that its doubling time is four times lower than in white (visible) light (Nien et al., 2022). Another FaRLiP strain, Halomicronema hongdechloris utilizes both chl a and chl f for photosynthesis under FR low light conditions (chl content per cell: 1.54 mg chl g −1 cell wet weight), nevertheless, and grows more rapidly than it does under WL (white light) low light conditions (chl content per cell: 1.0 mg chl g −1 cell wet weight; Li et al., 2014). Additionally, it has been shown that growth rates of some isolates can reach up to 80% by mimicking the field far-red light intensities of 6-8 μmol photons m −2 s −1 in comparison to those under the above described white light conditions, suggesting that chl f and chl d contributed effectively to cyanobacterial growth (Zhang et al., 2019). However, being in the presence of an already red-shifted spectrum, FR light adaptations could be vital for growing in further FR enriched environments as how expoplanet caves could be. Another prospect for space applications could be to genetically engineer non-FR-adapted cyanobacterial strains in order to allow the synthesis of red-shifted chlorophylls and extend the available light spectrum (Luan et al., 2020;Liu et al., 2021). Potential background strains could be chosen for improvements in biomass production (Verseux et al., 2016;Liu et al., 2021;Ramalho et al., 2022), mineral resources extraction (Olsson-Francis and Cockell, 2010), or resistance to extreme conditions (Billi et al., 2022). Preliminary studies to partially incorporate FaRLiP components have already been performed in cyanobacteria (Shen et al., 2019;Trinugroho et al., 2020;Tros et al., 2020), albeit so far, a full integration of the complete gene set has yet to be achieved. Such strains could be promising candidates for the cultivation in ePBRs on other planets as they effectively use the underlying natural light spectrum.

Cyanobacterial bioplastic production
Biodegradable and biocompatible materials such as PHAs/PHBs rapidly gained attention over the last decades (Anastas and Kirchhoff, 2002;Lenz and Marchessault, 2005). PHBs are microbially produced polymers ( Figure 2H), which act as storage units for both energy and carbon (Williams et al., 1999;Steinbüchel and Lütke-Eversloh, 2003). Microbial PHB production depends on external triggers, such as nitrogen or phosphate starvation as well as an oversupply of carbon sources (Steinbüchel and Lütke-Eversloh, 2003). Industrial bio-based production solely relies on heterotrophic microorganisms, which require a carbon feedstock, mostly polysaccharides (Chavez et al., 2022). This production bears some disadvantages: firstly, the loss of these feedstocks as food-source and secondly, the high costs of the feedstocks.
Material properties of PHBs are comparable to petroleum-based polymers such as polypropylene or polyethylene in terms of elasticity module and tensile strength (Chee et al., 2018). PHBs are biodegradable and can be degraded enzymatically by soil microorganisms, which makes them even more appealing regarding plastic pollution (Madison and Huisman, 1999).
With cyanobacteria being able to produce a broad range of PHBs from CO 2 and light, feedstock costs are low, making production partly attractive (Lee et al., 2021). Setbacks such as longer cultivation times have yet to be overcome (Das and Maiti, 2021;Lee et al., 2021). A case study about caves in Italy showed the capabilities of cave-inhabiting cyanobacteria to produce PHBs (Djebaili et al., 2022). Dark periods are somehow crucial for PHB production (e.g., Ansari and Fatma 2016), but why the ability for PHB biosynthesis in cave cyanobacteria is widespread remains unknown yet.
Compared to petroleum-based manufacturing processes, biobased production requires fewer facilities: bioreactors with a subsequent extraction step are sufficient, which means that fewer materials would have to be deployed to other planets (Harding et al., 2007). Recent studies focused on blending PHBs with different materials or using chemical engineering to diversify material properties in order to further extend the application range (Chee et al., 2018;Turco et al., 2021). As of today, pilot scale projects are on the rise, using cyanobacteria firstly to reduce the carbon footprint of processes (power plants) and to produce PHBs, as started in 2011 by the Austrian producer of electricity EVN. Commercially available PHBs are mostly produced with bacteria; however, genetic engineering of cyanobacteria also makes them more and more appealing for industrial application (Koch et al., 2020b).
Based on these findings PHBs could be produced extraterrestrially on-site as a platform compound with different postproductional blendings or chemical alterations to suit various applications in the biomedical, building or packaging sector. If combined with 3D printing technologies, product manufacturing could be fully automated and remotely supervised to install facilities before human colonization of other planets (Frone et al., 2019;Chiulan et al., 2021). The biodegradability of PHBs also possesses one more crucial advantage, the potential to establish a zero-waste circular economy that decreases the resource demands (Talan et al., 2022).

Cyanobacterial calcification and applications
Calcification, the process of biomineralization of CO 2 by calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ) precipitation, is a widely occurring phenomenon in ecosystems and plays a crucial role in the biogeochemical carbon cycle (Gattuso and Buddemeier, 2000;Ridgwell and Zeebe, 2005). The first descriptions of entanglement between microorganisms and calcification were presented many years ago for the process of stromatolite formation (Logan et al., 1964).
Mostly, calcification is known for its role in deep-sea carbon storage, carried out by marine microorganisms, especially cyanobacteria and coccolithophores (Westbroek et al., 1984;Planavsky et al., 2009;Milner et al., 2016;Feng et al., 2017;Kalokora et al., 2020). However, calcification is not exclusively taking place in aquatic environments. It can also be observed in terrestrial habitats e.g. by aerophytic cyanobacteria (Hodač et al., 2015;Kamran et al., 2020). Here, a special emphasis should be given to cave-inhabiting cyanobacteria, since numerous studies found them capable of calcification when associated with a Ca 2+ rich source, such as in karst caves (Figures 2B, F;Bourrelly and Dupuy, 1973;Arino et al., 1997). One theory states the potential for photon entrapment by distinct crystal structures, such as aragonite, which was shown for stone corals (Acropora sp.) and referred to as luminescent light collection (Neumann-Micheau and Tributsch, 2018). This theory could also be extrapolated to cave inhabiting cyanobacteria under low light conditions.
Although the mechanisms of this process remains largely unknown, biotechnological applications for calcification are on the rise. In terms of carbon-capturing processes, microbially produced CaCO 3 sheaths represent an inorganic carbon sink (Jansson and Northen, 2010). The usage of cyanobacteria exhibits a double effect on the carbon utilization capacity, because firstly, they are fixing CO 2 producing organic molecules during growth and photosynthesis and secondly capture inorganic carbon (CO 2 / HCO 3 − / CO 3 2− ) during calcification. Biotechnology has experimented with calcifying microorganisms in the field of sustainable and eco-friendly building materials (De Muynck et al., 2010;Wang et al., 2012). A recent study by Heveran and colleagues presented a proof of concept where calcifying Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 can be used to build actual concrete like-building blocks, which they referred to as living building materials (LBMs) Heveran et al., 2020). While the use of cyanobacteria for manufacturing of concrete type building materials may seem far away, first steps have been taken for an industrial approach realization. The company Prometheus Materials (Colorado, United States), for example already developed an algae-based construction material with a low carbon footprint. Also, Minus Materials (Colorado, United States) aims for what they refer to as biogenic limestone to replace concrete as building material. The industrial application in this field rapidly increases leaving room for more exploration, even in Space.
When thinking about installing permanent infrastructure for human residence on another planet / Moon, building materials from local resources is a must-have to decrease the deployment of materials from Earth by expensive space launches. If calcium and CO 2 were present in considerable amounts at the destined exo-planet, one could think about using cyanobacteria for manufacturing LBMs according to the published protocols of Heveran et al. (2020). Regarding the presence of lunar regolith, it might be possible to use these sands in a mixture with grown cyanobacterial biomass. According to NASA's data, lunar regolith is mainly composed of silicon (45.4%) but also bears a considerable amount of calcium (11.8%) (Taylor, 1975). Notably, a study also analyzed the distribution of plagioclase (a calcium-rich feldspar) on the Moon, and showed a high abundance of this material (Ohtake et al., 2009;Baasch et al., 2021). Moon mining approaches, combined with the fabrication of LBMs and 3D printing technologies, could provide a low cost-solution for building infrastructure on Earth's Moon and other planets (Cesaretti et al., 2014;Vítek et al., 2020).

Author contributions
PJ prepared the first draft of the manuscript and the figures. All authors contributed figures, revised and edited the manuscript and approved the final version.

Funding
The project is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) with the grant number JU 3228/1-1 to PJ and NU 421/1 to DJN. The joint project "Cyanolessinia" of FB is funded by the University of Verona (Italy) with the grant number JPVR19S9PT. ML is funded by the Ministry of Science and Health Rhineland-Palatinate (PhytoBioTech, 724-0116#2021/004-1501 15,405) and by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (W2V-Strategy2Value, 03WIR4502A & Technology2Value 03WIR4504B). Moreover, ML and FH are supported by EU-HORIZON (Waste2BioComp ID: 101058654).
Acknowledgments AG wants to thank Antonio Ordóñez, founder of Virtual Biodiversity (BV). All authors want to thank Astroland Agency and their astrobiology project within the framework of which this work was conducted.

Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences frontiersin.org Publisher's note All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.