Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Agroecology and Ecosystem Services
Volume 8 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1385296

Forage yield, competition, and economic indices of oat and common vetch intercrops in a semi-arid region Provisionally Accepted

 Yu Jiao1, 2 Qingping Zhang3  Fuhong Miao1, 2*
  • 1College of Grassland Science, Qingdao Agricultural University, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Grassland Resources and Ecology in the Yellow River Delta, China
  • 3College of Agriculture and Forestry Science, Linyi University, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Receive an email when it is updated
You just subscribed to receive the final version of the article

Intercropping of annual favorable legumes with grains to produce forage is utilized extensively worldwide to improve resource use efficiency. To identify the best intercropping system for a semiarid region of China, intercrops of oat (Avena sativa L.) and common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) at five planting proportions and oat and common vetch monocrops were produced over the 2011 and 2012 growing seasons in Xifeng, northwest China. Several indices were used to evaluate yields, competitive interrelationships between the two crops, and economic returns. The oat mono-crop had the highest dry matter yield (6.51 t ha -1 ), while the oat-common vetch intercrop, with an 80:20 planting ratio, produced the highest crude protein production (696 kg ha -1 ). The land equivalent ratio(1.167), relative crowding coefficient(2.445), and actual yield loss(0.750) were more favorable for the oat-common vetch intercrop at a seeding ratio of 20:80. The oat-common vetch intercrop at a seeding ratio of 20:80 showed the highest values for monetary advantage index(35.51). Overall, the autumn-sown 20:80 oat-common vetch intercrop was more productive from resource utilization and economic perspectives.

Keywords: Actual yield loss, Aggressivity, intercropping, Forage, Land Equivalent Ratio, Monetary advantage

Received: 12 Feb 2024; Accepted: 17 Apr 2024.

Copyright: © 2024 Jiao, Zhang and Miao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Mx. Fuhong Miao, College of Grassland Science, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China