Front. Vet. Sci.Frontiers in Veterinary ScienceFront. Vet. Sci.2297-1769Frontiers Media S.A.10.3389/fvets.2017.00119Veterinary ScienceCorrectionCorrigendum: Individual Signatures Define Canine Skin Microbiota Composition and VariabilityCuscóAnna12*SánchezArmand1AltetLaura2FerrerLluís3FrancinoOlga11Molecular Genetics Veterinary Service (SVGM), Veterinary School, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain2Vetgenomics, Ed Eureka, Parc de Recerca UAB, Barcelona, Spain3Department of Clinical Sciences, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, MA, United States
Edited and Reviewed by: Tracy Stokol, Cornell University, United States
*Correspondence: Anna Cuscó, anna.cusco@vetgenomics.com
Specialty section: This article was submitted to Veterinary Experimental and Diagnostic Pathology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Veterinary Science
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
A corrigendum on Individual Signatures Define Canine Skin Microbiota Composition and Variability by Cuscó A, Sánchez A, Altet L, Ferrer L, Francino O. Front Vet Sci (2017) 4:6. doi:10.3389/fvets.2017.00006skinmicrobiotamicrobiomedogcaninecoatskin site16S
In the original article, there was a mistake in Figure 3 as published. Although Figure 3 is scientifically meaningful, it does not fit the legend and the associated text on the manuscript. The corrected Figure 3 appears below. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.
Dog skin microbiota analysis considering site. (A) PCoA plot using weighted UniFrac metrics colored by skin site with values of ANOSIM and adonis statistical tests. Perianal region is circled in brown. (B) Boxplots of alpha diversity values. Marked with a red asterisk the two comparisons that were statistically different when using Monte Carlo permutation test (P < 0.05). (C) Bar plot representing skin microbiome composition at phylum level per skin site; each bar represents the mean values of the nine dogs per each skin site. (D) Histogram of linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size scores for differentially abundance distribution (α = 0.05, LDA score >3) of bacterial phyla and classes among skin sites.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.