AUTHOR=Hudon Alexandre 

TITLE=A hybrid fuzzy logic–Random Forest model to predict psychiatric treatment order outcomes: an interpretable tool for legal decision support

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence

VOLUME=Volume 8 - 2025

YEAR=2025

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/artificial-intelligence/articles/10.3389/frai.2025.1606250

DOI=10.3389/frai.2025.1606250

ISSN=2624-8212

ABSTRACT=BackgroundDecisions surrounding involuntary psychiatric treatment orders often involve complex clinical, legal, and ethical considerations, especially when patients lack decisional capacity and refuse treatment. In Quebec, these orders are issued by the Superior Court based on a combination of medical, legal, and behavioral evidence. However, no transparent, evidence-informed predictive tools currently exist to estimate the likelihood of full treatment order acceptance. This study aims to develop and evaluate a hybrid fuzzy logic–machine learning model to predict such outcomes and identify important influencing factors.MethodsA retrospective dataset of 176 Superior Court judgments rendered in Quebec in 2024 was curated from SOQUIJ, encompassing demographic, clinical, and legal variables. A Mamdani-type fuzzy inference system was constructed to simulate expert decision logic and output a continuous likelihood score. This score, along with structured features, was used to train a Random Forest classifier. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall and F1 score. A 10-fold stratified cross-validation was employed for internal validation. Feature importance was also computed to assess the influence of each variable on the prediction outcome.ResultsThe hybrid model achieved an accuracy of 98.1%, precision of 93.3%, recall of 100%, and a F1 score of 96.6. The most influential predictors were the duration of time granted by the court, duration requested by the clinical team, and age of the defendant. Fuzzy logic features such as severity, compliance, and a composite Burden_Score also significantly contributed to prediction accuracy. Only one misclassified case was observed in the test set, and the system provided interpretable decision logic consistent with expert reasoning.ConclusionThis exploratory study offers a novel approach for decision support in forensic psychiatric contexts. Future work should aim to validate the model across other jurisdictions, incorporate more advanced natural language processing for semantic feature extraction, and explore dynamic rule optimization techniques. These enhancements would further improve generalizability, fairness, and practical utility in real-world clinical and legal settings.