Front. Astron. Space Sci.
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
Front. Astron. Space Sci.
2296-987X
Frontiers Media S.A.
1320143
10.3389/fspas.2023.1320143
Astronomy and Space Sciences
Correction
Corrigendum: Hydrogen atoms near the exobase are cold: independent observations do not support the hot exosphere concept
Kotov and Bogomaz
10.3389/fspas.2023.1320143
Kotov
Dmytro
1
*
Bogomaz
Oleksandr
1
2
1
Institute of Ionosphere, Kharkiv, Ukraine
2
State Institution National Antarctic Scientific Center of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
Edited and reviewed by: Jaroslav Chum, Institute of Atmospheric Physics (ASCR), Czechia
*Correspondence: Dmytro Kotov, dmitrykotoff@gmail.com
07
11
2023
2023
10
1320143
11
10
2023
27
10
2023
Copyright © 2023 Kotov and Bogomaz.
2023
Kotov and Bogomaz
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
A Corrigendum on Hydrogen atoms near the exobase are cold: independent observations do not support the hot exosphere concept by Kotov D and Bogomaz O (2023). Front. Astron. Space Sci. 10:1200959. doi: 10.3389/fspas.2023.1200959
atomic hydrogen
exobase
hot atoms
cold atoms
independent observations
section-at-acceptance
Space Physics
In the published article, there was an error. There was a typo in 2 Comparison to observations by independent techniques, paragraph 2, in which “hot” was used instead of “cold”. The correct sentence appears below:
“It should be noted that both the analyses by Rairden et al. and Zoennchen et al. were also conducted assuming the cold hydrogen concept, i.e., the equality of the exobase hydrogen temperature to the temperature of oxygen thermosphere.”
In the published article, there was an error. There was a typo in 2 Comparison to observations by independent techniques, paragraph 3 in which the word “of” was used instead of “or”. The corrected sentence appears below:
“Thus, despite extreme sensitivity of the high-altitude exospheric H density to change of cold hydrogen assumption to hot one (see Figure 2 b, e of Qin and Waldrop paper), comparison with other observations employing cold hydrogen approach (Zoennchen et al., 2011; Zoennchen et al., 2013) cannot be useful to refute or support hot hydrogen concept.”
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.