<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
    <rss version="2.0">
      <channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <title>Frontiers in Behavioral Economics | Behavioral Microfoundations section | New and Recent Articles</title>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/behavioral-economics/sections/behavioral-microfoundations</link>
        <description>RSS Feed for Behavioral Microfoundations section in the Frontiers in Behavioral Economics journal | New and Recent Articles</description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <generator>Frontiers Feed Generator,version:1</generator>
        <pubDate>2026-05-15T00:24:59.859+00:00</pubDate>
        <ttl>60</ttl>
        <item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2026.1763499</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2026.1763499</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Women entrepreneurship and open market systems in agri-food businesses in Thyolo and Chiradzulu, Malawi]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-05-14T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Wongani Langa</author><author>Mayeso Sabola Kachingwe</author>
        <description><![CDATA[Women's entrepreneurship is central to the functioning of agri-food systems in sub-Saharan Africa, yet women-owned enterprises remain constrained by socio-cultural, structural, and financial barriers. This study examines how open-market systems shape opportunities and constraints for women entrepreneurs in agri-food businesses in Thyolo and Chiradzulu districts of Malawi. Rather than assuming linear enterprise progression, the analysis considers observable differences in enterprise scale, capitalization, and market integration. Using a mixed-methods design, data were collected from 360 women entrepreneurs through surveys, interviews, and field observations. Findings indicate that most enterprises operate at micro scale with low start-up capital, limited reinvestment, and minimal formalization, reflecting necessity-driven entrepreneurship. Open markets provide accessible spaces for income generation and household resilience, but also expose women to financial exclusion, weak institutional support, and gendered vulnerabilities. Capacity gaps are substantial, with limited access to business training despite strong demand for financial, marketing, and processing skills. Climatic shocks, governance weaknesses, and infrastructural deficits further constrain enterprise stability. Despite these challenges, women demonstrate pragmatic financial aspirations and engagement in collective arrangements, revealing latent growth potential. The study highlights the importance of gender-responsive finance, practical skills development, stronger group governance, and climate-resilient market infrastructure for improving enterprise sustainability and productivity in informal agri-food systems.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2026.1809068</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2026.1809068</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Sportswear preferences and purchase decisions among Filipino university students: a sociodemographic analysis]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-05-07T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Joseph Lobo</author><author>Wendy T. Cortez</author><author>Loui Maie C. Rivera</author>
        <description><![CDATA[IntroductionThis study examined how Filipino university students prioritize sportswear attributes and whether these preferences vary across sociodemographic groups within the context of Physical Activity Towards Health and Fitness courses (PATH-Fit). Framed within behavioral economics, the study treats sportswear purchasing as a form of everyday consumer decision-making shaped by functional need, budget constraint, and identity-related preference.MethodsUsing a cross-sectional design, data were collected from 401 students at a public higher education institution in the Philippines. Descriptive statistics were used to identify the most valued product attributes, while independent samples t-tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were employed to examine differences across sexual identity, age, year level, geographic area, and monthly average expenditure.ResultsResults showed that comfort, quality, and affordability were the most strongly prioritized attributes, indicating that students evaluated sportswear primarily through practical and value-sensitive considerations. Significant group differences also emerged. Women placed greater importance on several functional attributes, LGBTQIAP+ students assigned higher value to fashion and promotional cues, freshmen showed stronger preferences for affordability and durability-related features, and brand considerations became more salient among higher-spending students.DiscussionThese findings suggest that sportswear choice among university students reflects not only product utility, but also variation in financial capacity, identity-linked preference, and consumer valuation across groups. The study contributes context-specific evidence on attribute prioritization and heterogeneity in consumer choice within a sports-related educational setting.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2026.1820103</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2026.1820103</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Editorial: Coordination/ cooperation games]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-03-26T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Editorial</category>
        <author>Tetsuya Kawamura</author>
        <description></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1723819</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1723819</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Beyond background noise: underutilized sonic choice architecture in hospitality]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-02-10T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Mini Review</category>
        <author>Bingqing Liu</author>
        <description><![CDATA[Hospitality and consumer environments are undoubtedly multisensory, yet auditory stimuli remain underutilized as intentional components of choice architecture. This mini-review synthesizes evidence from psychology, neuroscience, and behavioral economics examining how soundscapes—particularly micro-auditory cues such as door clicks and elevator tones—are undervalued in their functions as behavioral nudges that influence guest perception and decision-making within bounded rationality frameworks. Current evidence demonstrates that auditory stimuli activate affective priming, processing fluency, and associative memory mechanisms that systematically bias consumer judgments of value and satisfaction, yet research predominantly examines macro-level interventions while micro-auditory cues and biometric methods remain underexplored. Smart technologies now enable adaptive, personalized sonic ecosystems that could respond dynamically to guest and consumer states, presenting opportunities for experience-enhancing nudges and ethical risks regarding manipulation and consumer autonomy. This review identifies critical research gaps and proposes future directions emphasizing micro-level interventions, biometric methods, and ethical frameworks for auditory choice architecture in hospitality environments.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1725333</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1725333</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Financial literacy may not directly drive investment participation or retirement planning in Japan]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-01-14T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Yi Jiang</author><author>Shohei Shimizu</author>
        <description><![CDATA[IntroductionJapan's rapidly aging society and pension-related deficits highlight the importance of household financial asset formation. Despite policies such as the Nippon Individual Savings Account, Japanese households still allocate over half their portfolios to deposits. While financial literacy has been linked to retirement planning and investment participation, existing research is largely correlational.MethodThis study uses individual-level data from the 2022 Financial Literacy Survey. We apply the Fast Causal Inference algorithm, which accommodates latent confounders, to examine causal relationships between financial literacy and financial activities, specifically investment participation and retirement planning.ResultsOur findings indicate that increasing financial literacy may not directly boost engagement in financial investments or retirement planning in Japan, which underscores the necessity for alternative strategies to motivate financial activities among Japanese households.DiscussionThis research offers valuable insights for policymakers focused on improving financial wellbeing by advancing the use of causal discovery algorithms in understanding financial behaviors.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1697570</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1697570</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Integrating upstream and downstream reciprocity stabilizes cooperator-defector coexistence in others-only public goods games]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-01-13T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Tatsuya Sasaki</author><author>Satoshi Uchida</author><author>Isamu Okada</author><author>Hitoshi Yamamoto</author><author>Yutaka Nakai</author>
        <description><![CDATA[IntroductionHuman cooperation persists among strangers in large, well-mixed populations despite theoretical predictions of difficulties, leaving a fundamental evolutionary puzzle. While upstream (pay it forward: helping others because you were helped) and downstream (rewarding reputation: helping those with good reputations) indirect reciprocity have been independently considered as solutions, their joint dynamics in multiplayer contexts remain unexplored.MethodsWe study public goods games (PGGs) without self-return (often called “others-only” PGGs) with benefit b and cost c and analyze evolutionary dynamics for three strategies: unconditional cooperation (X), unconditional defection (Y), and an integrated reciprocal strategy (Z) combining unconditional forwarding with reputation-based discrimination.ResultsWe show that integrating upstream and downstream reciprocity can yield a globally asymptotically stable mixed equilibrium of unconditional defectors and integrated reciprocators when the benefit-to-cost ratio exceeds a threshold (b/c > 2) in the absence of complexity costs. We analytically derive a critical threshold for complexity costs. If cognitive demands exceed this threshold, the stable equilibrium disappears via a saddle-node bifurcation. Otherwise, within the stable regime, complexity costs counterintuitively stabilize the equilibrium by preventing not only unconditional cooperators (viewed as second-order freeloaders) but also alternative conditional strategies from invading.DiscussionRather than requiring uniformity, our model reveals one pathway to stable cooperation through strategic diversity, where defectors serve as “evolutionary shields” preventing system collapse, while integrated reciprocators flexibly combine open and discriminative responses. This framework demonstrates how pay-it-forward broadcasting and reputation systems can jointly maintain social polymorphism including cooperation despite cognitive limitations and group size challenges, offering a potential evolutionary foundation for behavioral diversity in human societies.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1495995</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1495995</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Communication among selected members improves cooperation in a social dilemma]]></title>
        <pubdate>2025-12-04T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Brief Research Report</category>
        <author>Yoko Kitakaji</author><author>Yoichi Hizen</author><author>Susumu Ohnuma</author>
        <description><![CDATA[Communication is crucial to resolving conflicts such as social dilemmas. Previous literature concurs that communication among all group members increases cooperation. However, gathering all the members is often difficult. Hence, the effect of communication among some group members needs to be examined. The current study addressed this notion in a public goods experiment framework measuring the social value orientation of individuals. We conducted a six-person public goods game 20 times with members fixed. Between the 10th and 11th periods, we implemented different communication tactics: communication among all members, communication among three members selected randomly, or no communication (control). We observed that communication among some members increased the cooperation rate compared to no communication; however, the effect was weaker when compared with communication among all the members. Furthermore, partial communication increased the cooperation rate of prosocial individuals regardless of whether to join the communication process themselves. Proself individuals, on the contrary, cooperated as long as they communicated. Non-communicating members did not decrease their perception of goal-sharing and reciprocity compared to communicating members. These observations affirm that communication among some members is beneficial, even if assembling all the members is not always feasible.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1489282</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1489282</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Evidence-based cultural policies toward sustainable development: the case of Greece]]></title>
        <pubdate>2025-11-14T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Aikaterini Koumoutsea</author><author>Alexandros Sarris</author><author>Stavros Zografakis</author><author>Paraskevi Boufounou</author>
        <description><![CDATA[This paper aims to assess the impact of cultural heritage on Greek economic development. An input-output model approach is used to estimate a set of multipliers that measure the direct, indirect and induced (broader) macroeconomic impact of income, output, value added and employment of cultural heritage on economic growth. The multipliers of product, gross value added, income and employment are calculated, based on which the importance of the cultural heritage sector for the Greek economy is identified. Three different impact scenarios were applied to this analysis. The main finding of the study is the importance of the cultural heritage sector in conjunction with its interconnection with the tourism sector. The study provides a policy analysis framework for targeted structural economic interventions that can be implemented to improve the operational efficiency of the cultural sector in Greece.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1710651</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1710651</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Editorial: Behavioral economics in household decisions related to sustainability and innovation]]></title>
        <pubdate>2025-10-10T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Editorial</category>
        <author>Ji Lu</author><author>Wenguang Zhang</author>
        <description></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1539647</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1539647</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Exposure to climate-change related extreme weather events and risk preferences: evidence from farmers in Central Highland Afghanistan]]></title>
        <pubdate>2025-09-24T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Asadullah Jawid</author><author>Menusch Khadjavi</author>
        <description><![CDATA[We study whether long-term exposure to climate-change-related extreme weather events is associated with farmers' risk preferences. We combine (i) a household survey of 1,502 farmers across 14 districts in Afghanistan's Central Highlands with (ii) an incentivized lab-in-the-field risk task for 239 farmers, and (iii) farm-level GPS coordinates that proxy drought exposure via distance to rivers/streams. Our analysis shows that farmers in (very) high-exposure locations are systematically less risk-averse: exposure predicts choosing riskier gambles in the Eckel–Grossman task and reporting greater willingness to take risks. Plausibility checks using GPS distances corroborate self-reported exposure. We discuss mechanisms consistent with adaptation to a persistently riskier environment and with background risk dampening aversion to additional independent risks. Our findings highlight that climate change can alter economic preferences themselves, with implications for adaptation policy design (e.g., uptake of new seeds, irrigation, or insurance).]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1569272</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1569272</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Novel evidence of team reasoning in spatially-framed experimental bargaining games]]></title>
        <pubdate>2025-07-16T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Andrea Isoni</author><author>Anders Poulsen</author><author>Robert Sugden</author><author>Kei Tsutsui</author>
        <description><![CDATA[IntroductionTeam reasoning and bounded best-response models have been used to explain coordination success and failure in games with focal points. Most attempts at discriminating between them have used games framed as matching problems in which players choose between alternative payoff distributions. But evidence suggests that coordination failures are less dramatic in games framed as bargaining problems in which players separately claim parts of a valuable surplus. We contrast team reasoning and bounded best-response models using a variant of an established experimental paradigm in which tacit bargaining games are given a spatial frame.MethodsParticipants (N = 100) took part in 24 one-shot spatially-framed bargaining games in which the total surplus was divided into two, four or eight valuable discs scattered on a grid where each player was located in a specific position. Twelve games had spatial cues suggesting a Least Unequal Efficient (LUE) surplus allocation in which each player claimed the discs closest to them, and 12 games had no such cues. Each player's payoff was the total value of the discs claimed by them but not by the other player. In this setup, bounded best-response models predict players would follow the dominant strategy of claiming all discs, while team reasoning predicts each player should claim one of the LUE shares.ResultsAcross all games, the proportion of players claiming all discs ranged from 35 to 63%, exceeding 50% in just 4 games. In line with team reasoning, most non-dominant claims were LUE shares and players were significantly more likely to claim near than far discs.DiscussionExploiting spatial framing and leveraging payoff dominance, our experiment provides novel evidence for team reasoning in tacit bargaining. We also find some evidence that players favored by spatial cues sometimes do not accept that advantage. We discuss possible explanations for these patterns.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1444022</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1444022</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Financial literacy and investment decision: an empirical study from the Palestine Stock Exchange]]></title>
        <pubdate>2025-06-25T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Fairouz Sa'eed Mohammed Darwish</author>
        <description><![CDATA[IntroductionThis study investigates the relationship between financial literacy and investment decisions among Palestinian individuals participating in the stock market. It also examines the moderating role of overconfidence in this relationship.MethodsA quantitative approach was employed using a modified version of the OECD financial literacy questionnaire, adapted for the Palestinian context. The instrument included six sections: demographic information, factors influencing investment decisions, financial literacy, knowledge, and behavior. A total of 146 investors were surveyed.ResultsThe findings reveal that Palestinian investors possess a basic level of financial literacy, which positively influences their investment decisions. Demographic variables showed no significant effect on financial literacy. However, overconfidence was found to strengthen the relationship between financial literacy and investment decision-making.DiscussionThe study provides new insights into how financial knowledge and behavioral biases, such as overconfidence, jointly shape investment behavior. These findings highlight the importance of financial education initiatives and behavioral training in enhancing investor decision-making in emerging markets like Palestine.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1596416</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1596416</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Understanding environmental decision-making in forest restoration: the role of latent attitudes, attribute non-attendance, and choice behavior]]></title>
        <pubdate>2025-05-20T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Chulhyun Jeon</author>
        <description><![CDATA[IntroductionAs forests face growing threats from fires, pests, and disease, understanding public preferences for restoration policies has become increasingly urgent. This study addresses the need for more behaviorally realistic approaches in environmental valuation.MethodsA discrete choice experiment was conducted in Korea to explore how individuals make environmental decisions. The study incorporates latent environmental attitudes, attribute non-attendance (ANA), and heterogeneous choice behavior using advanced econometric models, including the independent availability logit and latent class analysis.ResultsFindings reveal that respondents do not ignore entire attributes but selectively disregard specific attribute levels. Distinct behavioral classes were identified, ranging from deterministic to probabilistic decision types. Latent attitudes significantly influenced willingness to pay (WTP), with some groups showing reluctance to pay due to self-benefit orientation.DiscussionThese results highlight the importance of recognizing behavioral subgroups when designing restoration policies. Integrating behavioral insights into valuation enhances the relevance and acceptability of forest restoration programs. This research provides practical guidance for developing targeted, socially accepted environmental policies.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1379577</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1379577</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Subjective financial scarcity today = objective financial scarcity in the future? The impact of subjective financial scarcity on saving for retirement]]></title>
        <pubdate>2025-04-22T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Kristjan Pulk</author><author>Thomas Post</author>
        <description><![CDATA[Subjective financial scarcity poses a significant concern that negatively impacts individuals' wellbeing. With attention tunneling to present financial worries, individuals might neglect their future financial situation, even if they objectively have enough funds to save. Such behavior can contribute to a deficient financial situation in retirement. To assess the impact of subjective financial scarcity on the intention to save for retirement, we conduct an online vignette survey experiment (n = 134). Using the two-limit tobit model, we find that subjective financial scarcity leads to lower retirement savings rate. We contribute to the literature by testing theoretical predictions of scarcity theory, providing experimental evidence for the myopic financial behavior orientation of retirement saving rates. We offer practical implications for policymakers, suggesting that interventions that promote saving for retirement should be designed with subjective financial scarcity and stress reduction messages in mind.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1449488</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1449488</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Reluctance to initiate cooperation: the trade-off between effectiveness and hesitation in the sequential one-shot prisoner's dilemma]]></title>
        <pubdate>2025-04-02T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Brief Research Report</category>
        <author>Hirofumi Hashimoto</author><author>Kanako Naganobu</author><author>Kaede Maeda</author><author>Shigehito Tanida</author>
        <description><![CDATA[Previous research suggests that initiating cooperation in a sequential one-shot prisoner's dilemma fosters mutual cooperation. We hypothesized that sense of control, defined as the belief that one's cooperative decision will be reciprocated, plays a crucial role in fostering mutual cooperation. To test this, we conducted two experiments comparing three conditions. In the simultaneous condition, both players made their decisions at the same time. In the self-first condition, participants made their decisions first in a sequential setting. In the other-first condition, they made their decision after observing their partner's choice. The results indicate that initiating cooperation increases the likelihood of mutual cooperation. However, participants were reluctant to be the first to cooperate, despite its effectiveness. Our paper discusses these findings from a cross-cultural psychological perspective, highlighting potential differences in cooperative behavior across cultural contexts.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1296207</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1296207</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Round, just-below, or precise prices? Cultural differences in the prevalence of price endings in E-commerce]]></title>
        <pubdate>2025-03-13T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Alfio Ventura</author><author>Eve Sarah Troll</author><author>Meikel Soliman</author><author>David D. Loschelder</author>
        <description><![CDATA[IntroductionThe consumer literature distinguishes between three different price endings: round (e.g., $10.00), just-below (e.g., $9.99), and precise (e.g., $9.87) prices. Extant research suggests that these prices can differ markedly in their prevalence between countries. Despite some empirical indication, the link between cultural characteristics and price-ending prevalence has yet to be quantified systematically; we know surprisingly little about why sellers and retailers prefer certain price endings over others.MethodIn the present, pre-registered research (OSF project1), we build on Hofstede's cultural model (1984) to investigate how the three cultural dimensions individualism, uncertainty avoidance, and long-term orientation can explain whether certain price endings are more (vs. less) prevalent. Using a web scraping approach, we extracted 9,200 prices from 23 different countries from an international online marketplace.ResultsOur results indicate that in countries (1) with higher individualism scores round and precise prices are more prevalent while just-below prices are less prevalent. (2) Higher uncertainty avoidance scores predict a higher prevalence of just-below prices and a lower prevalence of precise prices. Finally, (3) a higher long-term orientation predicts a higher prevalence of round prices and lower prevalence of just-below prices.DiscussionAltogether, our results suggest that Hofstede's cultural dimensions are useful in predicting the prevalence of price endings. The present research disentangles divergent empirical findings on price prevalence and furthers our knowledge on the link between cultural dimensions and price-ending practices. Taking a cultural perspective to understand price-ending prevalence is a fruitful avenue for future research and theorizing, as well as organizations, in particular online marketplaces.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1493427</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1493427</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Cooperation beyond group boundaries is evaluated differently depending on the existence of intergroup competition]]></title>
        <pubdate>2025-03-07T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Wakaba Tateishi</author><author>Nobuyuki Takahashi</author>
        <description><![CDATA[Do reputational mechanisms hinder or promote cooperation beyond group boundaries? This study explores the possibility that individuals lose reputational benefits within their group when they cooperate beyond group boundaries. We examined the evaluations of those who cooperated only with ingroup members (i.e., ingroup favoring strategy) and those who cooperated with both ingroup and outgroup members (i.e., universalistic strategy) by manipulating the existence of intergroup competition through an incentivized behavioral experiment. The results show that individuals' reputations were evaluated differently depending on conditions. In the competitive condition, the ingroup favoring strategy was evaluated more positively than the universalistic strategy. In the non-competitive condition, the universalistic strategy was evaluated as positively as the ingroup favoring strategy. The reputational dynamics of indirect reciprocity are less likely to promote cooperation beyond group boundaries, particularly in the existence of intergroup competition.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1492421</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1492421</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Meritocracy or malfeasance: violations of meritocracy erode civic rule following]]></title>
        <pubdate>2025-02-21T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Reuben Kline</author><author>Fabio Galeotti</author><author>Raimondello Orsini</author>
        <description><![CDATA[The perceived legitimacy of institutions, along with the voluntary compliance with authority that it undergirds, is crucial for stable governance and economic development. Legitimacy varies greatly across individuals and societies. We introduce a simple model of meritocratic equity—the notion that in a social exchange, individuals should receive greater compensation if their contributions exceed those of others. We argue that violations of meritocratic equity undermine the legitimacy of authority, leading to breaking rules, laws and civic norms—behaviors we refer to as justified malfeasance—in an effort to reduce perceived inequity. Using data from an incentivized laboratory experiment conducted in the United States and Italy and complemented by data from the World Values Survey, we investigate the effect of meritocratic violations on malfeasance. We find convergent evidence that meritocratic inequity explains variation in justified malfeasance across individuals and across countries. We conclude by discussing the implications of our results for multiple equilibria in societal levels of malfeasance and voluntary compliance with authority.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1494271</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1494271</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Individualism: the end of social cohesion? The effects of inequality and group identity on cooperation]]></title>
        <pubdate>2025-02-04T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Sebastian Senn</author><author>Nico Mutzner</author><author>Vincent Oberhauser</author><author>Heiko Rauhut</author>
        <description><![CDATA[IntroductionGlobal challenges like pandemics and climate change are fundamentally cooperation problems, where individual interests often conflict with the collective good. Rising economic inequality and individualism are believed to erode social cohesion and cooperation, exacerbating these tensions. Public goods games (PGGs) are widely used to study cooperation in scenarios of unequal resource distribution, but findings on the effects of inequality remain inconsistent, partly due to varied applications of heterogeneity across studies.MethodsThis study introduces a novel research design that directly compares collectivistic and individualistic groups to examine the combined effects of individualism and inequality on cooperation. Groups were exposed to different resource distribution conditions, including both equal and unequal distributions, and their cooperation rates were measured.ResultsThe findings reveal no significant differences in cooperation rates between collectivistic and individualistic groups. However, groups with higher inequality exhibited significantly higher cooperation rates than those with equal resource distributions. Notably, heterogeneous groups showed considerable variation in their success at establishing cooperation. Further analysis indicates that the willingness to reduce initial inequality served as a strong signal, enhancing group identity and fostering cooperation.DiscussionThe results suggest that in contexts where group identity is strong, inequality can act as a coordination mechanism, enabling groups to distribute the burden of collective costs more effectively and enhancing overall cooperation. These findings challenge the assumption that inequality inherently undermines cooperation and highlight the potential for strategically leveraging inequality in contexts characterized by collectivistic norms.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2024.1547739</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frbhe.2024.1547739</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Editorial: Sports, economics, and natural experiments: advances and retrospection]]></title>
        <pubdate>2025-01-17T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Editorial</category>
        <author>Raphael Flepp</author><author>Romain Gauriot</author><author>Carl Singleton</author>
        <description></description>
      </item>
      </channel>
    </rss>