Abstract
Nanozymes are inorganic nanostructures whose enzyme mimic activities are increasingly explored in disease treatment, taking inspiration from natural enzymes. The catalytic ability of nanozymes to generate reactive oxygen species can be used for designing effective antimicrobials and antitumor therapeutics. In this context, composite nanozymes are advantageous, particularly because they integrate the properties of various nanomaterials to offer a single multifunctional platform combining photodynamic therapy (PDT), photothermal therapy (PTT), and chemodynamic therapy (CDT). Hence, recent years have witnessed great progress in engineering composite nanozymes for enhanced pro-oxidative activity that can be utilized in therapeutics. Therefore, the present review traverses over the newer strategies to design composite nanozymes as pro-oxidative therapeutics. It provides recent trends in the use of composite nanozymes as antibacterial, antibiofilm, and antitumor agents. This review also analyzes various challenges yet to be overcome by pro-oxidative composite nanozymes before being used in the field.
1 Introduction
Nanozymes are a class of nanomaterials possessing intrinsic enzyme activity, which puts them at the center of attraction for diagnostics and therapeutic applications. Engineering of nanozymes for high catalytic activity, easy synthesis, cost-effectiveness, stability, and sometimes reusability makes them superior to natural enzymes (; Meng et al., 2019). Ever since 2007, when ferromagnetic nanozymes were first reported to have peroxidase (POD) mimicking activity, nanozymes possessing oxidase (OXD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), esterase, or nuclease-like activities were synthesized and used in environmental or biomedical applications (Wang X. et al., 2016a; Yu et al., 2020; Yang et al, 2021; ). The utilization of nanozymes in therapeutics relies on the use of their pro-oxidative and antioxidative activities. Nanozymes exhibiting POD- and OXD like properties possess the capability of converting H2O2 into reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as hydroxyl radical (•OH), singlet oxygen (1O2), and superoxide anion (•O2−) (Xiong et al., 2019; ). These radicals are highly oxidative molecules capable of interacting with proteins and lipids in the cell membrane of living cells, causing intense damage to the organelles and inducing apoptosis or necrosis-mediated cell death (Yang et al., 2020). In addition to the pro-oxidative catalytic activity, nanozymes also display antioxidative catalytic activities such as SOD and CAT, which mediate the scavenging of ROS generated in the cell and prevent cells from oxidative damage. Both these activities of nanozymes are harnessed in therapeutics such as wound disinfection, tumor therapy, nervous disorders, etc. (Yang et al., 2021). The treatment regime mediated by nanozyme-generated oxidative radicals is termed CDT (Xu et al., 2020). The use of nanozyme pro-oxidative potential has shown immense potential as nanoantibiotics for treating bacterial infections, inhibiting biofilms, wound disinfection, and healing and in tumor therapy (Wang H. et al., 2019). Despite this, their successful translation from the laboratory to the clinic is not yet achieved due to some limitations such as poor efficacy in catalyzing low concentration of H2O2, non-reusability of nanozymes, most nanozymes are unable to engage effectively with target cells, intrinsic shortcoming of ROS due to its short lifetime (less than 200 ns), and a small diffusion distance (approximately 20 nm). In addition, the nanozyme’s non-compatibility with specific tissue environments such as highly moist wounds and weekly acidic and hypoxic tumor microenvironment (TME) restricts their practical applicability.
To circumvent such challenges, nanozymes can be engineered by tailoring their size, shape, surface, etc. One effective strategy for engineering pro-oxidative nanozymes is to produce a hybrid or alloy of more than one component. Such composite nanozymes not only inherit the individual properties of each component and overcome the shortcomings but can also integrate other functionalities (photothermal effect, photodynamic effect, etc.) to design intelligent, multifunctional nanoplatforms for disease therapy. Various advantages offered by composite nanozymes are depicted in Figure 1. Recent reviews have discussed the synthesis strategies of different nanozymes and their overall applications in diverse disciplines (Liu et al., 2020; Huang et al., 2018) or toward detection, imaging, and biomedicine development (Liang and Yan, 2019). However, focused reviews encompassing composite nanozyme-based nanoplatforms with augmented ROS capability and their applicability in therapeutics are scarce. Recently, reviewed nanozyme-based composite materials for antibacterial and antibiofilm application. Nevertheless, considering the potential embedded in the composite nanozyme-mediated ROS-based disease therapeutics and the volume of research articles published in this area, it is highly relevant to review the recent trends in this specific domain. Hence, in this review, recent advancements in designing composite nanozymes to upregulate their ROS generating potential are discussed. The strategies for making them multifunctional nanoplatforms and conferring newer properties to enhance their applicability as ROS-mediated disease treatment regimens are reviewed here. We illustrate various composite nanozymes with pro-oxidative activity used in therapeutic applications and also discuss their advantages and future prospects. We believe that this review will help in future investigations on composite nanozymes with augmented pro-oxidative potential in disease therapy.
FIGURE 1
2 Catalytic Activity of Nanozymes in Therapeutics
Nanotechnology has presented an opportunity to design disease therapeutics utilizing enzyme-based natural defense mechanisms in living cells such as those mediated by xanthine peroxidase, myeloperoxidase, and haloperoxidase (). Such defense routes bestow protection by highly damaging oxide radicals against the pathogenic microorganism. Natural enzymes act as antibacterial agents by ROS production that irreversibly kills the bacteria. For example, in fresh milk, an enzyme called lactoperoxidase acts as an antibacterial agent by catalyzing H2O2 and oxidizing thiocyanate (SCN−) to produce hypothionite ions (OSCN−) (). Nanomaterials mimic natural enzymes in action and not only display pro- or antioxidative catalytic activity but also mimic hydrolase-like activity (). For instance, nanomaterials exhibiting DNAse () and phospholipase activity () cause hydrolytic cleavage of extracellular DNA (eDNA) and phospholipids, respectively, and display antibiofilm activity. Hence, a brief understanding of the mechanism of different enzyme mimetic actions of nanozymes becomes important toward designing novel nanomaterials.
2.1 Peroxidase Mimic Activity
Peroxidases are a group of enzymes which catalyze the oxidation of various substrates (TMB, OPD, and ABTS) in the presence of H2O2 to generate reactive-free radicals (Scheme 1A). Until now, various nanomaterials such as carbon-based, metals, metal oxides, and metal sulfides are known to display POD mimic activity (Yang et al., 2020). Fe3O4 nanoparticles were the first to demonstrate POD-like activity through a Ping–Pong kinetic mechanism (). POD-catalyzed oxidation of TMB/H2O2 is a two-step electron transfer process. The first step yields a TMB radical cation through single-electron oxidation. Two of these intermediate radical cations combine to form a blue-colored charge-transfer complex (= 370 and 652 nm). In the second electron transfer step, the cation radical is further oxidized to yield a TMB diimine derivative (TMBDI; λ = 450 nm). In this way, the absorption spectrum of the oxidation products of TMB usually shows three absorption bands (Scheme 1B). Following more or less similar reaction kinetics, POD mimic composite nanozymes catalyze the breakdown of H2O2 to produce toxic ROS (•OH, •O2) that have a promising role in therapeutics.
SCHEME 1
2.2 Glutathione Peroxidase Mimic Activity
Glutathione peroxidase also belongs to the peroxidase family and protects organisms from oxidative damage. It oxidizes glutathione (GSH) in the presence of H2O2 to glutathione disulfide (GSSG) and H2O (Scheme 2). These nanozymes also exhibit a Ping–Pong catalytic mechanism wherein the nanozyme first reacts with H2O2 to form an intermediate which then oxidizes GSH to GSSG. Glutathione (GSH) is a tripeptide present in bacteria, as an antioxidant defensive system, and protects bacteria from oxidative stress by scavenging reactive-free radicals. Similarly, nanozymes with both GSH peroxidase and POD-like activity could be used as effective therapeutics in killing bacterial and cancer cells. For instance, nickel disulfide (ND) composite nanozyme with glutathione peroxidase–like activity depleted GSH and weakened the bacterial defense system, whereas its POD activity generated high ROS that irreversibly damaged bacteria (Wang et al., 2020). Similarly, the ultrasmall SnFe2O4 nanozyme possessed both POD and glutathione peroxidase activity. The SnFe2O4 nanozyme depleted GSH levels in cancer cells, and high ROS production could efficiently kill the cancerous cells (
SCHEME 2

Reaction catalyzed by glutathione peroxidase mimic nanozymes (Barrington, 2013).
2.3 Haloperoxidase Mimic Activity
Haloperoxidases also belong to the peroxidase family and catalyze the oxidation of halide ions to hypohalous acid by H2O2. Nanozyme catalytic activity has also been shown to eliminate biofilms in the marine environment. The V2O5 nanowire, with the assistance of H2O2, converted halide ions (Cl−, Br−) to produce hypohalous acid, which caused oxidative stress to the bacteria and could protect the ships against microbial adhesion in the ocean. The local vanadium coordination geometry of the exposed lattice planes of V2O5 nanowires was similar to that of the active site of natural vanadium haloperoxidase. Vanadium atoms could function as catalytic reactive sites to produce intermediate peroxo species due to their strong affinity for H2O2, a critical step in the enzymatic reaction. As a result, the halide ions attack the more susceptible and less electron-rich oxygen atoms of the peroxo complex intermediate with the production of hypohalous acid (Scheme 3A). The strong oxidizing ability of hypohalous acid can irreversibly kill bacteria (
SCHEME 3

(A) Reaction catalyzed by haloperoxidase mimic nanozymes, (B) Fabrication of ceria nanofibrous mat. The hybrid mat can catalyze Br− with H2O2 to HOBr to prevent bacterial adhesion on its surface. Adapted and reprinted with permission from
2.4 Oxidase Mimic Activity
Oxidase is an enzyme having a key role in cellular metabolism and processes that catalyze oxidation of various substrates by utilizing molecular oxygen to form ROS (H2O2 or •O2) (Scheme 4A). The oxidase family is categorized according to the acting groups of donors, including sulfur groups, amino groups, CH-OH groups, Ph-OH groups, and ferrous ions (
SCHEME 4

(A) Reaction catalyzed by oxidase mimic nanozymes (
2.5 DNase Mimic Activity
Deoxyribonuclease (DNase), a type of nuclease, cleaves phosphodiester linkage in DNA molecules and degrades it into fragments (Scheme 5). DNases can be used for gene editing, DNA repair, or as antibiotics in the treatment of skin diseases and bacterial infections (
SCHEME 5

Reaction catalyzed by DNase mimic nanozymes (
2.6 Phospholipase Mimic Activity
Phospholipase is an enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolytic cleavage of phospholipids at various sites (Scheme 6). A major component of the bacterial cell membrane is phospholipid, which plays a key role in biofilm formation, and its cleavage could disrupt biofilms. Phospholipase-mimetic ceria-based nanozyme could hydrolyze the phospholipids in bacterial cell membranes and bacterial biofilms efficiently (
SCHEME 6

Depiction of various cleavage sites of a phospholipid by different phospholipases, PLA1-cleaves sn-1 acyl chain; PLA2-cleaves the sn-2acyl chain; PLC-cleaves before phosphate, releasing diacylglycerol and phosphate-containing group; PLD- cleaves after phosphate, releasing phosphatidic acid and alcohol. Adapted and reprinted with permission from
Table 1 presents a comparison of the aforementioned enzyme mimic activities displayed by nanozymes that kill bacteria or cancerous cells through different mechanisms. Some of these such as DNAse and phospholipase mimic nanozymes are relatively less explored. The design of a nanozyme that could exhibit and utilize more than one type of these pro-oxidative activities to kill its target cell may have high potential as a therapeutic agent.
TABLE 1
| Enzyme activity displayed | Nanozyme mimic | Substrate | Mechanism of action | Therapeutic applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peroxidase | Broad range including metal, metal oxide, metal organic framework–based, and carbon-based nanozymes | H2O2 | Generated ROS (•OH, •O2) cause oxidative stress–mediated cell killing | Antibacterial, anticancer, antibiofilm, and wound healing |
| Oxidase | Most nanoparticles such as Au, NiO, Pd, V2O5, IrOx, etc | O2 | Generates ROS (H2O2 or •O2) that causes oxidative damage | Antibacterial; anticancer |
| Glutathione peroxidase | Few nanoparticles such as NiS2, PdFe/GD | Glutathione and H2O2 | Deplete glutathione by converting into glutathione disulphide and weakens bacterial defense system | Antibacterial; anticancer |
| Haloperoxidase | Nanoparticles such as CeO2 and V2O5 | Halide ions (Cl and, Br−) | Generate hypohalous acid which causes oxidative cell damage | Antibiofilm; antibiofouling |
| DNase | Nanoparticles such as CeO2 and MOF/Ce | DNA | Cleaves DNA of biofilm into fragments | antibiofilm |
| Phospholipase | Nanoparticles such as Nanoceria | Phospholipids | Hydrolysis of long-chain phospholipids present on the bacterial cell membrane and disrupt it | antibiofilm; antibacterial |
Comparison of various pro-oxidative enzyme mimic activities exhibited by composite nanozymes.
3 Composite Nanozymes With Pro-oxidative Potential
Nanozymes, particularly new-generation hybrid nanostructures, have aroused increasing attention by virtue of their superior pro-oxidative potential compared to natural enzymes and have shown practical applications such as antibacterial, antibiofilm, and antitumor in therapeutics. Currently, a number of hybrid or composite nanozymes (Figure 2) are being designed by integrating their pro-oxidative potential with other functionalities and using them as multifunctional nanoplatforms in disease therapeutics as discussed here.
FIGURE 2

Nanomaterial-based composite nanozymes with pro-oxidative enzyme-like activity.
3.1 Metal-Based Composite Nanozymes
Metal-based nanoparticles are well known to mimic POD and OXD activity, with promising applications in therapeutics. Metal-based nanozymes are in vogue owing to their easy synthesis and facile surface modification and convenience to hybridize with other elements and tailor their shape-size, high stability, biocompatibility, and electromagnetic functionality (
3.2 Metal Oxide and Sulfide Based Nanozymes
Recently, various metal oxides such as Fe3O4 (
Currently, manganese dioxide (MnO2), a transition metal oxide, in combination with other components, is widely explored for cancer therapy with special and unique physicochemical properties. The MnO2 nanostructure is highly sensitive to the TME and rapidly degrades in the reduced and acidic environment, which is why it can be used as a tumor-specific drug vehicle. In addition, MnO2 is shown to catalyze H2O2 overproduced in tumor cells to produce O2in situ and overcome TME hypoxia (Wu M. et al., 2019b; Zhu et al., 2020). Zhu et al. constructed a composite core–shell-structured nanozyme (MS-ICG@MnO2@PEG) having indocyanine green (ICG) loaded as a photosensitizer in the MnO2 shell for photodynamic therapy (PDT) clubbed with ROS-mediated chemodynamic therapy (Zhu et al., 2020). MnO2 also catalyzed intratumoral glutathione (GSH) to convert Mn4+ oxidation state into Mn2+ oxidation state, which simultaneously decomposed H2O2 by POD-like activity to form highly reactive •OH. Mn2+ being water-soluble were excreted easily from the body without causing toxicity. Li et al. fabricated MnO2/IrO2-PVP nanocomposite and loaded it with a photosensitizer Chlorin e6 (Ce6) that specifically responded to the TME. MnO2 in tumors catalyzed the production of O2 by H2O2 to alleviate hypoxia condition and also reacted with H+ and performed MRI function, whereas IrO2 possessed photothermal activity that converted O2 formed in the tumor to toxic singlet oxygen upon light irradiation, thereby enhancing the PDT. Thus MnO2/IrO2-PVP nanocomposite by synergistic mechanism displayed outstanding antitumor therapy (
In recent years, experiments indicate that metal-sulfide nanomaterials with enzyme-like activity exhibit excellent antibacterial properties. Xu et al. reported a strategy for converting garlic-derived natural organosulfur compounds into a nano-iron sulfide that exhibited excellent antibacterial activity. It was shown that nano-iron sulfide with POD- and CAT-like activities can catalyze the oxidation of H2O2 to generate highly toxic hydrogen polysulfide. Nano-iron sulfide exhibited 500-fold increased antibacterial efficacy and also eliminated biofilms on human caries and promoted wound healing (Xu et al., 2018). Yin et al. synthesized molybdenum disulfide nanoflowers functionalized with polyethylene glycol that possessed high POD and PTT activity under NIR absorption. PEG-MoS2 NFs generated high ROS and disrupted the membrane of drug-resistant and endospore-forming bacteria and promoted wound healing (Yin et al., 2016).
3.3 MOF Material–Based Composite Nanozymes
The metal-organic framework (MOF) is a type of porous crystalline material designed by incorporating metal-containing nodes with organic ligands linked through coordination bonds (Wang et al., 2020;
3.4 Carbon-Based Nanozymes
Carbon-based nanomaterials that possess catalytic activities include graphene, carbon nanotubes, fullerene, and carbon dots (Sun H. et al., 2020), and their derivatives find wide applications in diverse fields due to their outstanding electronic, optical, thermal, mechanical properties, low cost, biosafety, and multienzyme mimicking activities (Wang X. et al., 2016b;
3.5 Hydrogel-Based Nanozymes
Hydrogels are known to maintain a moist environment and could act as a barrier for microbes around the wound interface. Newer techniques have been used to integrate ROS-generating composite nanozymes with hydrogels for sustained and efficient therapeutic applications. A PVA hydrogel incorporated with rGO/MoS2/Ag3PO4 composites was synthesized to have enhanced photothermal and photocatalytic function and was used for rapid and effective treatment of bacterial infection in chronic wound healing (Zhang et al., 2019). The mechanical property and swelling ratio of hydrogels were significantly improved with rGO. In another study, ZnO QDs@GO NCs were introduced into chitosan hydrogels and designed as a multifunctional platform. Zn2+ produced with the dissolution of ZnO QDs by lysosomal acid was absorbed by bacteria, leading to inhibition of respiratory enzymes and ROS generation, whereas GO acted as a photosensitizer under NIR irradiation. This multifunctional hydrogel showed excellent wound healing and antibacterial applications in moist conditions (Liang et al., 2019). Similarly, poly-2-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (PDMAA) hydrogels were decorated with multifunctionality by encapsulating ROS generating hollow carbon nanoparticles and aloe-emodin (AE antibiotic extracted from Aloe leaves) within them. NIR-triggered ROS generation caused immediate bacterial killing, and continuous release of AE from the gel showed long-term effects and accelerated recovery of an infected wound (Xi et al., 2018).
Excessive amounts of free copper for therapeutic applications induced toxicity, which could be reduced with the utilization of hydrogels. Qiu et al. constructed the hydrogel-based artificial enzyme comprising copper and amino acids with good biocompatibility and peroxidase mimetic activity, exhibiting broad-spectrum antibacterial activities against both drug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria and Gram-negative bacteria. Furthermore, this system was prepared to function as a wound dressing, which could combat wound pathogens effectively and promote wound healing by stimulating angiogenesis and collagen deposition (Qiu et al., 2020). Sang et al. reported that MoS2-hydrogel mimicking peroxidase nanozyme could efficiently capture bacteria and realize excellent antibacterial and wound healing efficiency compared to traditional nanozyme. In addition, the system removed dead bacteria from the wound and reduced the incidence of inflammation (Sang et al., 2019). A comparison of the advantages and shortcomings of the abovediscussed classes of composite nanozymes is compared in Table 2.
TABLE 2
| Composite nanozymes | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Metal-based | Easy synthesis, facile surface modification, tunability of shape-size, electromagnetic functionality, high catalytic activity, easy to hybridize with other elements, positive synergistic coupling effect, and ability to stabilize free radicals (Au NPs) | Only few metals are biodegradable and releases in the form of ions cause toxicity |
| Metal-oxide based | High stability, easy to prepare, adjustable porosity, facile incorporation into hydrophobic and hydrophilic systems, and good redox chemistry | Toxic, traditional method of synthesis is not feasible |
| Metal-organic framework–based | Porous structure provide abundant surfaces and channel for electron transfer, adsorption, loading, and separation of targets, metal nodes in MOF provide the possible active sites for catalysis, and organic ligands offer rich functional groups for chemical modification | Toxic, poor selectivity, and difficulties in recycling and regeneration |
| Carbon-based | Excellent transportation property (e.g., graphene), rich surface chemistry, low cost non-toxicity (graphitic carbon nitride), long-term storage, and high stability | Low catalytic activity, catalytic mechanism unknown, difficulties in rational design, and construction |
| Hydrogel- based | Flexile, biocompatible, capture target cells with high efficiency due to charge and pore. Biodegradable, diversiform structure and properties, easily transportable, and easy to tune | limited nanozyme type, low mechanical strength, and difficult to handle and are expensive, non-adherent |
Advantages and disadvantages of different composite nanozymes.
4 Engineering Composite Nanozymes for Enhanced Pro-oxidative Activity
Composite nanozymes can be variously tailored to generate strong ROS that can be subsequently used in antitumor, antibacterial, or wound healing applications. A number of factors can be considered to design an effective composite nanozyme with strong pro-oxidant potential (Figure 3).
FIGURE 3

Engineering composite nanozymes with enhanced pro-oxidative (A). Defect-rich surface of composite nanozymes enhance the affinity of composite nanozymes to bacteria. Adapted and reprinted with permission from reference (Wang et al., 2020). (B). Multicatalytic action of composite nanozymes perform cascade reaction and exert superior activity. Adapted and reprinted with permission from the reference (Wei et al., 2020) (C). Conjugation of CXCR4 to Fe3O4@Pt@E5 specifically target cancerous cells and synergistically treat AML (
4.1 Choice of Materials
The choice of materials used to synthesize hybrid or composite nanozymes with high ROS generating ability is highly crucial. H2O2 is considered an effective antibacterial disinfectant. However, a biologically safe level of H2O2 can only be used for generating •OH radicals. Hence, it is imperative to design highly efficient catalytic nanozymes that can catalyze the conversion of very low levels of H2O2. Composite nanozymes can solve this problem to a great extent. Some materials such as AuNPs exert a synergistic coupling effect by generating more ROS and stabilizing the generating radicals. For instance, Wang et al. integrated AuNPs with g-C3N4 because -NH2 and -NH groups on g-C3N4 nanosheets served as effective Lewis bases to chelate metal ions and showed high affinity for Au3+, leading to the growth of AuNPs on g-C3N4 nanosheets. The composite nanozyme possessed excellent peroxidase ability as compared to only AuNPs and g-C3N4 nanosheets, which was due to the stabilization of •OH radicals generated by the breakdown of H2O2 by AuNPs via partial electron exchange interaction (Wang et al., 2017). Ultrasmall AuNPs possess high catalytic activity but are prone to aggregation, which can be reduced by producing hybrids with 2D MOFs as the latter can impose fast kinetics and effectively lower mass-transfer resistance of catalytic reactions (
The adsorption energy of metallic NPs dispersed on any solid support and the electron transfer capability of the nanocomposite greatly influences their catalytic ability. Wang et al. prepared PdFe nanostructure decorated graphdiyne nanosheet (PdFe/GDY) as a peroxidase mimic because Pd when alloyed with Fe or GDY was previously shown to have the optimum adsorption energy required for accelerated H2O2 decomposition and stability of oxygen-containing radicals, whereas GDY could act as a promising support due to bonding between its π electron pair and empty d-orbitals of Pd atoms. PdFe/GDY showed surprisingly high peroxidase activity compared to HRP. This was owing to more available adsorption sites on PdFe/GDY for TMB and H2O2 and low adsorption energy (-0.62 eV) of •OH on the Pd, leading to an increase in H2O2 decomposition (Wang et al., 2021).
Recently, the effect of doping transition metals (Zn, Ni, and Co) on the catalytic performance of Fe3O4 nanozymes was evaluated (Vetr et al., 2018), and CoFe2O4 NPs showed the highest catalytic activity. Later, Wang et al. showed that Co-doped Fe3O4 nanozymes not only possessed high peroxidase activity but had a 100-fold higher affinity for H2O2 than Fe3O4 nanozymes that could catalyze ultralow concentrations (10 nM) of H2O2. Though Co possesses a similar size as Fe atoms, its higher redox potential Co3+/Co2+ (1.30 V) than that of Fe3+/Fe2+ (0.771 V) and ability to produce more catalytically active sites and substrate-binding sites on nanozyme could be responsible for the high peroxidase activity of Co@Fe3O4 nanozyme (Wang Y. et al., 2019).
Similarly, Jiang et al. have synthesized B-doped core-shell Fe@BC nanozymes, where the Fe core was covered by over ten layers of B-doped carbon shells. The DFT calculations proved that the high peroxidase activity of the nanozyme was attributed to B doping in BCO2 that provides more electrons to H2O2 to promote O–O bond breakdown and a low-energy barrier (-1.16ev) for H2O2 conversion (
4.2 Nanozyme Surface and Morphology
The catalytic action of nanozymes is affected by a number of factors inherent to the nanozyme such as size, shape, and surface charge, some of which have been explained in recent reviews (Navyatha et al., 2021). The ROS generating capability of nanozymes is strongly affected by the oxidation or valence state of the atom, structural defects, surface roughness, etc. These factors become important in designing a composite nanozyme when its ROS generating capability is intended to be of therapeutic use. Because these properties of nanozymes could affect the bacteria capturing ability of the nanozyme, they generate surface-stabilized ROS, which helps in overcoming the short life span and slow diffusion rate of ROS. It further could make the nanozymes efficiently catalyze much lower and safer H2O2 concentrations. Defect engineering means modifying the band edges and band-gap energies which increases the catalytic performance of the nanozyme (Twilton et al., 2017), and the rugged nano-morphology provides a trap for bacterial adsorption. Inspired by this, Wang et al. synthesized a defect-rich adhesive MoS2/rGO vertical heterostructure as a multienzyme antibacterial mimic (Figure 3A) (Wang et al., 2020). The microwave-assisted hydrothermal method introduced many surface defects with double vacancies for S and Mo. At acidic pH, the nanozyme possessed POD-, CAT-, and OXD-like activities, and the strong ROS species could show excellent antibacterial effects in situ. Recent experimental approaches show that oxygen vacancy engineering can create trapping sites for electrons and can be used to improve the catalytic activity of nanomaterials (
4.3 Multicatalytic Action
Recently, composite nanozymes possessing multiple catalytic actions, including pro-oxidative and antioxidative functions, have been synthesized. However, their catalytic activities can be tuned by optimizing their pH of action. Some pro-oxidative nanozymes can possess both OXD- and POD-like activity and could act as superior nanozymes by generating both •OH and •O2− radicals. For instance, Fe and N co-doping in hollow carbon spheres endowed them with appreciable POD-, CAT-, and SOD-like activities (
Nanozymes are also used as multienzyme nanoreactors which display cascade catalytic reactions and are used in tumor therapy (Liu et al., 2020). For instance, GOx activity was integrated with the ROS generating ability of nanozymes and was used for ROS-mediated tumor cell killing along with inducing starvation conditions in the cells. IrRu-GOx@PEG NPs were loaded with natural GOx, which converted tumor-sensitive glucose to H2O2 and killed tumor cells due to starvation by depleting the nutrient source. Second, IrRu NPs catalyzed endogenously produced H2O2 to highly toxic singlet oxygen 1O2 (that mediates oxidative damage), and O2 released oxygen helped in continuing the reactions of starvation therapy (Figure 3B) (Wei et al., 2020). Another such cascade nanoreactor, Pd@Pt-GOx/HA, was modified with an outer layer of hyaluronic acid, which could block various catalytic activities of the nanozyme, reduce its cytotoxicity to normal cells, and specifically target CD44-overexpressed tumors (Ming et al., 2020). The HA layer gets decomposed by hyaluronidase in tumor cells and exposes the nanozyme’s catalytic sites. Ultrasmall trimetallic (Pd, Cu, and Fe) alloy nanozyme (PCF-a NEs) displayed glutathione oxidase and POD cascade reactions in circumneutral pH, which was used for tumor CDT in combination with photothermal ablation and ultrasound (
4.4 Decorating With Unique Biomolecules
Introducing surface coatings, chelating ions, or antibiotics on the surface can increase the stability and enzyme mimetic activity of nanostructures. The use of tannic acid for reducing Au (III) to form AuNPs and subsequent chelation with Cu2+ ions was used to fabricate a shell-coated Au@TACu nanozyme with increased peroxidase activity and excellent photothermal performance (Liu et al., 2020). Apart from the dual ROS and PTT effects, the acidic TME caused the dissolution of the TACu shell and the released Cu2+ depleted the overexpressed GSH, augmenting the oxidative stress–mediated killing of tumor cells. It is well known that CXCR4/CXCL12 interaction leads to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after chemotherapy and hence the strategy of conjugating the CXCR4 antagonist on the Fe3O4@Pt composite nanozyme’s surface interferes with this axis (Figure 3C) (
4.5 Introducing Multifunctionality
An important aspect of composite nanozyme designing also encompasses endowing them with some additional features in addition to ROS generating ability to enhance their usability and efficacy. For instance, Mu et al. reported reusable nanozymes by synthesizing a super-paramagnetic NiCo2O4-Au composite that can be easily separated from the media with a magnet. Their antibacterial activity remained intact for three cycles of separation (Mu et al., 2021). MnOx-PLGA@PDA nanoparticles (PP-MnOx) were synthesized as a multifunctional antitumor platform by integrating the oxidase mimic potential of MnOx and its ability to act as a sensitive T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging agent with the cytotoxic effect of artesunate encapsulated within the PLGA core (Xi et al., 2021). The multifunctionality feature of composite nanozymes can also be augmented by combining their ROS generating ability with PTT and PDT. The synergistic actions of these modalities have shown accelerated antitumor and antibacterial effects. For effective CDT, nanozymes catalyzing the oxidation of intracellular glutathione were also designed.
Light has been shown to activate the enzyme-like properties of nanozymes (Liu et al., 2019). Liu et al. have studied the effect of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) on activating the POD-like activity of CeO2 for antibacterial action. Au@CeO2 nanozymes were synthesized with low oxidase and peroxidase-like activity, which was enhanced three times after 808-nm laser irradiation as compared to only CeO2 NPs or Au nanorods at weekly acidic pH (Liu et al., 2021). Xu et al. synthesized a multifunctional platform enabling photothermal/chemodynamic/pharmaco-synergistic antibacterial action by encapsulating tungsten sulfide quantum dot (WS2QD) nanozyme and vancomycin antibiotic in a thermal-sensitive liposome. POD mimic activity of WS2QD generated radicals; OXD mimic activity catalyzed GSH oxidation, causing its depletion; and thermal sensitivity improved catalytic activity and liposome rupture, facilitating targeted drug delivery (Figure 3D) (Xu et al., 2020).
Thus, the first strategy for designing efficient ROS-generating composite nanozymes should be to judiciously choose constituent elements that can enhance electron transfer to generate ROS, provide low adsorption energy to stabilize the generated radicals on the nanozymes surface, possess higher redox potentials and high affinity, could act as support for POD mimic elements, or could allow plasmon-induced electron transfer to other constituent elements. These properties, besides being intrinsic characteristics of an element, can also be improved to some extent by modifications in synthesis conditions (reactants and stabilizers used, method of synthesis, pH, temperature of synthesis, calcinations etc.) of the composite nanozymes. Modifications in synthesis conditions can directly influence their surface topography and morphology, for example, creating surface defects, roughness, oxygen vacancies, electron-hole pairs, making them porous, or having pseudopodia-like extensions can directly impact the intrinsic catalytic behavior of the composite nanozymes. Since catalysis is a surface phenomenon, such modifications can have nanozymes with improved Km and Vmax values, which can be used to catalyze low H2O2 concentrations or in situ produced H2O2. In addition, the overall bacterial/tumor cell killing ability of composite nanozymes can be accelerated by exploring multienzyme mimic synergistic activities within a nanozyme and prohibiting the antagonistic catalytic activity. For instance, heteroatom doping in carbon nanomaterials confers multimimic activity besides enhancing the enzymatic efficiency. Making cascade nanozymes and integration with PTT or PDT can also enhance their specific cell killing ability.
5 Research Progress in ROS-Mediated Therapeutic Applications of Composite Nanozymes
Composite nanozymes designed recently show both intrinsic peroxidase- and oxidase-like activity to generate ROS •OH, •O2−, and H2O2, which can vividly damage more lipids, amino acids, and polysaccharides in the bacterial membrane and also kill cancerous cells due to their oxidative and electrophilic nature (
5.1 Antibacterial and Wound Healing Applications
Composite nanozymes have shown broad-spectrum nanoantibiotic effects by killing gram-positive, gram-negative, and multidrug resistant bacteria at low and biologically safe H2O2 concentrations (
FIGURE 4

Schematic representation of composite nanozymes as effective antibacterial and antibiofilm agents. (A). Mechanism of enzyme mimic Pd@Ir nanostructures for potential antibacterial therapy. Adapted and reprinted with permission from the reference (
TABLE 3
| S. no. | Nanozyme used | Structural property of nanozymes leading to catalytic action | Catalytic property shown | Working pH of nanozymes | Km | Vmax | ROS species generated | Demonstrated application | Mechanism of action | Other specific property of nanozymes | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CuCo2S4 | Uniform, well-crystallized cubic spinel, size -30 nm | POD | 7.4 | 209.9 mM | 232.8 n M·s −1 | •OH | AB, WH | Oxidative stress | Antibiofilm | Li et al. (2020) |
| 2 | Dealloyed porous Pt/Ag nanoparticles | Porous, Pt-enriched octahedron, size range - 20.9–22.1 nm | POD, OXD, CAT- | 4.0 | 0.86 mM | 34.75 (×10–8 M s−1) | •OH | AB | Oxidative stress, disrupts permeability of the membrane | As biosensors, and biomedicine | |
| 3 | Cu2WS4 nanocrystals | Cuboid, size ∼20 nm | POD | 4 | — | — | H2O2 and •OH | AB, WH | oxidative stress | Selective and good bacteria-binding ability | Shan et al. (2019) |
| 4 | Cu2MoS4 | Uniform morphology, size is ≈ 28 nm | POD, OXD | 4 | OXD-12.06 µm, POD- 25.46 | OXD- 0.11 μm s−1 | H2O2, •OH | AB | Oxidative stress | Enhanced activity under NIR-II | Shan et al. (2020) |
| OXD-42.81 × 10–8 | |||||||||||
| 5 | (MoS2)/rGO | Defect-rich surface | POD, OXD | 3.0 | POD-0.26 mM | POD-25.6 (10–8 M/s) | •OH | AB,WH | Structural deformation. Causes oxidative stress through GSH (antioxidant) consumption and ROS generation | Defect and light irradiated improved activity, Also, GSH consumption ability | Wang et al. (2020) |
| 6 | CuS/GO | Needle-like | POD, OXD | 4.6 | — | — | •OH | AB, WH | Nanoknife mechanism (puncture bacterial membranes), and though generation of ROS | Good biocompatibility | Wang et al. (2020) |
| 7 | UsAuNPs/MOFs | 2D ultrathin morphology | POD | pH 5.0 | 7.94 × 10–3 m | - | •OH | AB,WH | Oxidative stress | Negligible biological toxicity | |
| 8 | Fe/N-HCNs | Hollow porous | POD, OXD | 3.5 | — | — | •OH | WH | ROS destroyed bacterial cells treat bacteria-infected inflammation | CAT and SOD activity treat noninfectious inflammation | |
| 9 | Pd@Ir | Octahedral core shell structured, size ∼14 nm | POD, OXD | 4.0 | 0.28 mM | 0.079 (10–7 Ms−1) | H2O2, •OH | AB | Oxidative stress, damage membrane | Biocompatible | |
| 10 | Au@CeO2 | Uniform dumbbell-shape size ∼20 nm | POD | 3.0 | 0.006 mM | 13.34 nM S−1 | OH and 1O2 | AB | Oxidative stress | Good catalytic stability and durability | Liu et al. (2021) |
| 11 | NSP-CQDs | Spherical nature and excellent dispersibility, size 2–6 nm | POD | 4.0 | 32.61 mM | 6,950.68 10−8 Ms−1 | •OH | AB | •OH, attacking the bacterial cell membrane | Applicable in immunoassays, biotechnology, and clinical diagnosis | Tripathi et al. (2020) |
| 12 | L-Arg/GOx@CuBDC | Sea urchin–like, Size-250 ± 50 nm | GOx, POD, NOS | 7.4 | — | — | •OH, •O2 | AB | ROS and RNS oxidize and degrade organics, including penetrating cell membrane, reacting with biological substrates (lipids, proteins, DNA, and RNA) | High specificity | |
| 13 | Co-Al-Ce mixed metal oxide | Good dispersion of catalytically active components and high specific surface area | POD | 4 | 32.9 mmol/L | — | •O2 | AB | Oxidative stress | Application in marine antifouling | Chan et al. (2020) |
| 14 | Nickel disulfide | Monodispersed and uniform spherical, porous, diameter -112.31 nm | POD | — | ∼3.64 mM | ∼1.55 × 10̵4 mM min̵1 | •OH | AB | Cell wall damage by ROS, consume GSH in bacteria | Photothermal activity | Wang et al. (2020) |
| 15 | MoS2-Hydrogel | Positively charged porous, Flower like diameter- 165 nm | POD | 4 | — | — | • OH | AB | Damage membrane and causes oxidative stress | Photothermal properties under visible and NIR region | Sang et al. (2019) |
| 16 | Hydrogel-based artificial enzyme (copper and L-aspartic acid) | Network nanofiber diameters -50–70 nm | POD | 7.4 | 38 Mm | 9.6 × 10−8M S−1 | • OH | WH, AB | ROS Oxidize cell membrane of bacteria | Negligible toxicity and high biocompatibility | Qiu et al. (2020) |
| 17 | WS2QDs-Van@ lipo | Spherical uniform size less than 10 nm | POD, OXD | 2–4 | — | — | • OH | AB and antibiofilm | ROS and drug mediated | Oxidize GSH improve CDT PTT/pharmaco synergistic antibacterial therapy, NIR-controlled drug release | Xu et al. (2020) |
| 18 | GQD/AgNP hybrids | Size-2–10 nm | OXD, POD | 5–7 | — | — | OH,•O2− | AB | ROS-mediated oxidative stress and disruption of bacterial membrane | Photothermal activity | |
| 19 | CaO2/H-G@alginate | 2D nanosheet | POD | 5 | 2.568 mM | 0.185 μM S−1 | hROS | Antibiofilm | hROS can damage the main component of biofilm | No need of H2O2 | Yan et al. (2018) |
| 20 | Au/g-C3N4 | Size- 150 nm | POD | 5.0–7.4 | 60.0 ± 3.21 (10−5 M) | 150.8 ± 4.95 (10−7M·S−1) | •OH | AB, WH | ROS-mediated oxidative stress | Antibiofilm | Wang et al. (2017) |
| 21 | 2D MOF (2D Cu-TCPP(Fe) GOx (MOF (2D Cu-TCPP(Fe)/GOx | Sheet-like structure, Crystal size 13.6 | POD | 3–4 | — | — | •OH | AB, WH | •OH-induced oxidative damage | GOx convert glucose into abundant gluconic acid and H2O2 avoiding the use of toxic H2O2. negligible biotoxicity | Liu et al. (2019) |
| 22 | MSN-Au NPs | Bean-like size-500 nm | POD, OXD | 4 | 15.81 ± 0.76 mM | 12.66 ± 0.36 (10-8M· s −1) | •OH, •O2−1O2 | AB | ROS-induced oxidative stress | Antibiofilm | Tao and Ju, (2015) |
| 23 | PdFe/GDY | Wrinkled nanosheet, size- | POD | 4 | 0.1653 mM | 0.9711 10–8 M s−1 | •OH | AB,WH | ROS-mediating bacterial cell membrane destruction | GSH activity | Wang et al. (2021) |
| 24 | PEG-MoS2 NFs | Flower-like, diameter-25 nm | POD | 3–4 | 2.812 mmol L−1 | 3.88 × 10−7 | •OH | AB, wound healing | ROS and hyperthermia-mediated oxidative damage | PTT and accelerated GSH oxidation in the 808-nm laser | Yin et al. (2016) |
| 25 | Co4S3/Co(OH)2 | Tube-like diameter -∼70 nm | OXD | 4 | 1.33 mM | 4.66 7–10 M/s | O2−, 1O2 | AB | ROS-induced oxidative damage | Complete sterilization without H2O2 | |
| 26 | Cu-HCSs/H2O2 | Spherical and hollow structure diameter -∼100 nm | POD | 4.5 | — | — | •OH | AB | ROS and released Cu2+ caused membrane damage, lipid peroxidation, and DNA degradation of bacteria | Used to treat intestine infection induced by S. typhimurium | Xi et al. (2019) |
| 27 | NiCo2O4-Au | Tube- like rough surface | POD, OXD | 4 | 28.33 ± 7.304 (10–3 mM) | 28.773 ± 0.103 (M/S) | •OH, •O2−, 1O2 | AB, WH | ROS-induced oxidative damage | Antibiofilm, recyclable | Mu et al. (2021) |
| 28 | Co-V MMO Nanowires | Nanowire with rich surface defects | POD, OXD | 4 | 0.12 (mM) | 5.3 (10–8 M/s) | •O2, •OH | AB | ROS-induced oxidative damage | Application in the fields of new energy and catalysis | Wang et al. (2020) |
| 29 | Co4S3/CO3O4 | Hollow tube-like diameter -∼166.7 nm | POD, OXD | 4 | 0.17/mM | 1.6 × 10−5/M/s | OH•, 1O2, •O2− | AB | ROS-mediated oxidative stress | No need of H2O2, good selectivity, promising recyclability, and reliable | Wang et al. (2020) |
| 30 | Fe3O4@MoS2-Ag | Defect-rich rough surface, diameter ∼428.9 nm | POD | 4 | 1.00 (mmol/L) | 1.11 (✕10−7mol/(L·s) | OH• | AB | Toxic ·OH and Ag + assisted by local hyperthermia attack the bacterial membranes | Adhesive ability Reusable | Wei et al. (2021) |
| 31 | Ir−Ag−IrO2 | Uniform and rough surface, size -90 nm | POD | 3 | 67.94 ± 3.83 μM s−1 | 0.3193 ± 0.0517 M | • OH | AB | ROS-mediated oxidative stress | More precise and selective local treatment | Yim et al. (2020) |
Various composite nanozymes with demonstrated use as antibacterial and wound healing agent through ROS.
5.2 Anti-Biofilm
One of the strategies to prevent biofilm formation on surfaces is to incorporate antibacterial and anti-adhesive coatings on these surfaces. In this context, the strategy of using nanomaterials for designing super hydrophobic (Ren et al., 2018), and more stable hydrophilic/superhydrophilic surfaces (Valencia et al., 2018) was explored. But these coatings were susceptible to damage from complex environmental changes. To address this issue, the recent approach is to design smart responsive materials as anti-adhesive materials and possessing the switchable function of being antibacterial (
Streptococcus mutans thrives well in sugar-rich and acidic microenvironments associated with dental caries. The antagonist action of commensals such as S. oralis is limited due to low concentrations of intrinsic H2O2 production and its confined effect. Hence, a bifunctional nanohybrid system possessing dual-catalytic activity was designed by conjugating GOx on dextran-coated iron oxide NPs (Figure 4B) (
5.3 Antitumor
Nanozymes display strong ROS-mediated antitumor potential, and considerable endeavors are made to realize this potential. However, the complex TME limits their therapeutic efficacy and drives the need for a TME-specific and endogenously responsive approach for efficiently utilizing nanocatalytic therapy. The TME is characterized by a weakly acidic environment, high glutathione (GSH) concentrations, overproduction of H2O2 (50–100 × 10−6 m) hypoxia, and an immunosuppressive environment. High GSH concentrations could offshoot the pro-oxidative nanocatalytic effect of nanozymes (
FIGURE 5

Schematic of representation of yolk-shell gold@carbon nanozymes with intrinsic enzyme mimic activity and photothermal response as an effective antitumor agent Adapted and reprinted with permission from (Fan, 2018).
The antitumor potential of nanozymes is also realized by integrating MnOx nanozymes with artesunate-loaded drug carrier Poly-(lactic-glycolic acid) PLGA to form PLGA@PDA nanoparticles (PP-MnOx NPs) (Xi et al., 2021). PDA was used to link nanozyme with PLGA. The nanozyme exhibited OXD-mimicking activity to catalyze the conversion of O2 and generate ROS. Mechanistic insight showed that the electrons released during conversion of Mn2+/Mn3+ on the surface of nanozyme to Mn4+ were trapped by O2 to form H2O2. Activation of mitochondrial apoptotic pathways due to synergistic action of ROS and sustained release of the drug artesunate leads to efficient tumor cell death. The ROS generating capability of Fe3(PO4)2 8H2O–CDs (carbon nanodots)–FA hybrid nanoflowers (hNFs) was found to effectively kill cancerous cell lines in the presence of exogenous H2O2 and in combination with ascorbic acid mediated endogenously produced H2O2 (
TABLE 4
| S. no. | Nanozyme used | Structural property of nanozyme leading to catalytic action | Catalytic property shown | Working pH of nanozyme | Km | Vmax | ROS species generate | Mechanism of action | Other specific property of nanozyme | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fe3O4@Bi2S3 | Virus-like diameter∼ 80 nm | POD | 5.5 | — | — | • OH | ROS kill cancer cells | Possesses photoacoustic and (PA) Infrared Thermal Imaging (IRT) imaging capacity. Photothermal activity under near-infrared (NIR), recyclable | Zhao et al. (2020) |
| 2 | AgPd@BSA/DOX | Rough core-shell branched structure, Size ∼120 nm | POD | 5.5 | — | — | • OH | Through hyperthermia with the photoreactive release of chemotherapy drug and ROS generation | Have photothermal conversion ability under NIR laser irradiation. A nanocarrier of drug doxorubicin | Li et al. (2020) |
| 3 | DMSN-Au-Fe3O4 | Central-radial pore structures, diameter ∼140 nm | POD, GOx | 6.5 | 10.10 × 10–3 m | 1.996 × 10–8 m s−1 | H2O2,• OH | ROS-induced apoptosis of cancerous cells | Excellent biosafety, easy excretion | |
| 4 | CD44MMSN/AuNPs | Wrinkle structure, diameter ∼50 nm | POD, OXD | 3.6 | 6.35 mM | 3.85 × 10–8 Ms−1 | H2O2,•OH | ROS-mediated apoptosis | Tumor-specific precision therapy, “toxic-drug-free” and non-invasive nanocatalytic biomedicine | Wang et al. (2020) |
| 5 | Au@HCNs | Spheres, diameter- 180 nm | OXD, POD | 4.5 | 0XD-0.170 mM POD-0.0323 Mm | OXD-4.92 × 10−8 POD-33.00 | ,•OH | light-enhanced ROS generation and photothermal-induced killing of cancerous cells | Excellent NIR absorbing agents for tumor PTT | Fan et al. (2018) |
| 6 | PEG-Cu2Se HNCs a | Hollow nanocube diameter- 86.89 ± 19.93 nm | POD | 7 | — | — | • OH | ROS and photothermal-mediated | Good PCE under NIR II window | Wang X. et al. (2019c) |
| 7 | Fe3O4@Pt@ E5 | Janus structure Size-(Fe3O4 8.0 ± 1.0 nm and Pt 2.0 ± 0.5 nm) | POD, OXD | 4.0 | 22.17 mM | 0.139 µMs-1 | •OH | Apoptosis by generation of ROS and block the CXCR4/CXCL12 axis | Negligible side effects | |
| 8 | MIL-101@BSA-AuNCs NPs | Possessed good dispersibility, size -150 nm | POD | 7.4 | — | — | ·OH | By generation of ROS | Act as thermal sensitization agents under microwave radiation, possesses dual modality imaging property | Ma et al. (2019) |
| 9 | NMIL-100@GOx@C | Polyhedral shape, size- 175 nm | OXD | — | — | — | H2O2 | ferroptosis and starvation treatment | Perform Fenton reaction and catalyze H2O2 (oxidase convert glucose n to gluconic acid and H2O2) produce ·OH | Wan et al. (2020) |
| 10 | GOx@Pd@ZIF-8 | Irregular sphere, size-130 nm | POD | — | — | — | ·OH | By ROS-mediated apoptosis and glucose starvation | Inhibiting proliferation of cancerous cell both in vivo and in vitro | |
| 11 | CPGL (GOD, LOD, and C-dots were loaded into the hydrophobic core with the aid of PLGA.) | uniformly distributed, and granular diameters- ∼ 7–12 nm | POD | 4.55 | 0.02827 ± 0.00873 mM | 36.3782 ± 5.24999 mM s−1 | ·OH | By glucose starvation and ROS generation | pH-sensitive ability, excellent tumor-homing ability with good biocompatibility | Wang et al. (2020) |
| 12 | PtFe@Fe3O4 | — | POD, CAT | 2.5–6.5 | 53.55 mM | 1.078 × 10−7 | •OH, O2 • – | Through ROS generation | Bimodal contrast agent for computed tomography (CT) and PA imaging, -guided diagnosis, Exhibit photo-enhanced catalytic activities under NIR | |
| 13 | Fe3O4@PPy@GOD NCs | uniform with an ∼163.5 nm | POD | 6.5 | 1.59 mm | 2.64 × 10–9 M s−1 | •OH | By glucose starvation and ROS-mediated apoptosis | dual-modality diagnostic imaging-guided synergistic nanocatalytic cancer therapy and photothermal-triggered cancer hyperthermia. efficiency in NIR-I and NIR-II biowindows | |
| 14 | N-PCNs | Porous nanospheres, size 100 ± 10 nm | POD, OXD | 4.5 | OXD-0.084 mM, POD-130 mM | OXD-0.42 10−8 M s −1, POD-32.5 10−8 M s −1 | H2O2 and •OH | By upregulation of ROS | Also possess CAT- and SOD- like activity | Fan et al. (2018) |
| 15 | MnO2@PtCo | Nanoflowers, size - 3 nm | POD, CAT | 2.5–6.8 | — | — | •OH production | ROS-mediated apoptosis | CAT activity help overcome hypoxic condition and enhance the catalytic activity of PtCo | Wang et al. (2018) |
| 16 | GSF@AuNPs | 2D nanostructured, size 100–400 nm | POD | 5 | 5.980 mM | 27.7 × 10–7 M s−1 | OH• | Oxidative stress by ROS | Utilized as a selective, quantitative, and fast colorimetric detection probe for cancer cells | Maji et al. (2015) |
| 17 | Cu2-xTe | cuboid structure, size -30 nm | Glutathione oxidase, POD | 5 | Glutathione oxidase 0.19 ± 0.03 Mm, POD-135 ± 10 Mm | Glutathionoxidase-19.3 ± 1.1 μM s−1 POD- 87 ± 0.02 | OH• | Intratumoral oxidative stress to induce immunogenic cell death | Consume GSH and exhibit photothermal activity under NIR-II Light | Wen et al. (2019) |
| 18 | Fe3O4@C NPs | Core−shell structure, size -120 nm | POD | 3 | 0.38 mM | 73.99 × 10–8 M s−1 | • OH | ROS-mediated oxidative stress | Selectively, magnetic responsiveness and receptor-binding specificity | |
| 19 | Magnetic hydrogel nanozyme (MHZ) | Spherical core−shell structure, size 30–50 nm | POD | 5.2 | — | — | • OH | Oxidative stress damages the protective heat shock protein 70 | Powerful platform for combination with hyperthermia and catalytic therapy | Wu H. et al. (2019a) |
| 20 | HCS@Pt-Ce6 | — | POD, OXD | 4.5 | POD-0.04853 mM, OXD-0.352 mM | POD-21.7871 10−8 M⋅s−1, OXD-0.8243 10−8 M⋅s−1 | • OH | ROS and photodynamic mediated apoptosis | Synergistic photodynamic-catalytic therapy of tumor | Xu et al. (2020) |
| 21 | AuPt@SF (APS) | Intriguing nonregular polyhedral structure, Size ∼36 nm68.71 ± 32.8 nm | GOx, POD. | 5.5 | POD-28.148 mM, GOx45.795 μg/ml | POD-6.756, GOx -0.125 μM/s | O2—and •OH | Through deleterious tumor starvation and irreversible oxidative-stress destruction | GSH depletion | Yang R. et al. (2021b) |
| 22 | CoO@AuPt | Hollow, diameter ∼36 nm | OXD, POD | GOx -6.5, POD and CAT-6.8 | — | — | O2,•OH H2O2 | ROS and glucose starvation–mediated inhibition of tumor | Also possess CAT activity | |
| Deplete Glutathione | ||||||||||
| 23 | UMOFs@ Au NPs | Core shell structure size-29.8 ± 2.2 nm | OXD | 4.5 | 44.27 mM | 12.96 × 10–7 M s−1 | H2O2 and1 O2 | Glucose starvation and ROS mediated | PDT effects under NIR light irradiation | |
| 24 | PEG/Ce-Bi@DMSN | Bacteria like | POD, CAT | 5.5 | 27.54 × 10–3 m | 3.85 × 10–8 m s−1 | • OH | impaired the antioxidant defenses of tumor cells and causes oxidative stress | Deplete GSH, and also Act as PTT agent in the NIRII- biowindow |
List of composite nanozymes with demonstrated use as an antitumor agent through ROS.
6 Limitations and Challenges of Composite Nanozymes
As discussed above, composite nanozymes have presented themselves as multifunctional catalytic agents for disease therapy. Despite the numerous advantages offered by composite nanozymes, their translation from the laboratory to field is far from reality because of the limitations and challenges faced by them. The first and foremost limitation is their low selectivity toward the target cell, which could raise concern about their toxicity and off-target effects. Second, composite nanozymes at times display multiple enzyme mimic activities, such as pro-oxidative (peroxidase and oxidase) and antioxidative activity (superoxide dismutase and catalase) at the same time, which could interfere with desired activity in the living system or may cause a reverse effect. Third, the optimal catalytic activity of many composite nanozymes is restricted to acidic pH, which is not compatible with the physiological and biological conditions. The peroxidase activity of nanozymes is also dependent on the use of H2O2, which itself could be toxic beyond a threshold. Hence, pro-oxidative nanozymes that do not depend on the use of H2O2 would be more suitable and welcomed. Another important issue with composite nanozymes is their biosafety. Composite nanozymes intended to be used for biomedical applications are engineered to interact with cells/tissue. However, broad focus remains on the therapeutic performance of composite nanozymes while ignoring their biosafety assessment. For instance, inorganic nanoparticles mimicking enzyme-like activity frequently accumulate in the reticuloendothelial system (RES), resulting in low passive targeting specificity and long-term toxicity, limiting their use in clinical trials (Yang et al., 2019). Some nanozymes such as nickel disulfide showed good biodegradable properties but had relatively long blood circulation times, which limits their practical applications (Wang et al., 2020). The size, composition, surface charge, dose, and functional groups of composite nanozymes affect their kinetics, specificity, and toxicity. For instance, increasing the size of graphene oxide can improve the potential for bacteria killing but poses toxicity to normal cells and tissues (Mei et al., 2021). Metal-based composite nanozymes not only display good therapeutic effects but also impose a potential health issue due to ionic dissolution such as Zn2+ and Cu2+ that interact with biomolecules such as proteins and enzymes, inactivating them and causing metal poisoning to cells and tissue (
Hence, it is equally critical to conduct a systematic assessment of nanozyme biosafety in terms of assessing their absorption, biodistribution, metabolism, clearance mechanism, pharmacokinetics, H2O2 concentration, and long-term toxicity in addition to their therapeutic effect in in vivo studies. Furthermore, long-term toxicity studies involving particle size, shape, and surface chemistry are required to ensure the nanozymes are suitable for in vivo biological applications. In addition, research into nano-bio interfaces, nanozyme immunotoxicity, genotoxicity, and neurotoxicity from molecules to organisms is still in progress and has to be thoroughly investigated. Because these nanomaterials are designed to interact with cells, it is critical that these interactions do not have a negative impact on the human body.
7 Conclusion and Perspective
In this review, the recent developments in using the intrinsic ROS generating ability of composite nanozymes for various therapeutic applications are presented and understood. Composite nanozymes score over other nanozymes in offering unique inherent properties of constituent elements that synergistically enhance their applicability. For instance, Ni nanoparticles barely oxidize the enzyme substrate, whereas Pd NPs possess multienzyme mimic activity, and NiPd nanoparticles exhibit higher catalytic activity than any of these alone (Wang Q. et al., 2016). The pro-oxidative composite nanozymes have found increased applicability as antibacterial, antibiofilm, and antitumor agents. It is due to their ability to alleviate limitations of existing ROS generating nanozymes such as 1) inefficiency to produce significant levels of ROS to kill bacteria at biologically safe low H2O2 concentrations; 2) single-modal nanozymes cannot effectively eradicate resistant bacteria or abnormal cells, 3) inefficient capture of H2O2 or generated radicals on bacterial surface; and 4) limited catalytic activity in the TME.
The composite nanozymes provide flexibility in their design and synthesis by offering a diverse choice of elements to be used for support or as dispersed nanoparticles. Tailoring nanozymes to closely mimic natural enzymes can be used as a strategy to design efficient composite structures. For instance, Zhang et al. have used covalent organic frameworks (COFs) to tailor the pore microenvironment around active centers and enhance the catalytic ability of MOFs (Zhang et al., 2021). The pseudopodia-like structure of the COF enabled the nanozyme platform to capture bacteria efficiently through multivalent interactions between hairy bacteria and spiky COFs. The various strategies discussed for engineering composite nanozymes in this review can be used for accelerating their ROS generating ability, making them multifunctional (photothermal, optical, photodynamic, and chemodynamic activity), adhesive, reusable, and compatible to act at neutral or near-neutral pH and in hypoxic TME, efficient enough to eliminate multidrug resistant bacteria/biofilm and targeted tumor cell killing. Hydrogel-based composite nanozyme can especially accelerate wound healing and disinfection.
Despite the reporting of various composite nanozymes with enhanced ROS ability and superior therapeutic applications, their translation from the laboratory to market is yet to be achieved. Hence, composite nanozymes need to be engineered to overcome the challenges discussed in Section 6. As this field is still in its infancy and evolving, we expect that the following new paradigms in engineering composite nanozymes could contribute toward addressing these challenges in the near future. 1) The catalytic efficiency of the nanoenzyme could be improved by modifying its lattice (spatial) structure so as to increase active catalytic centers, defect-rich active edges or oxygen vacancies etc. 2) In order to restrict the intrinsic antagonistic catalytic activity of a composite nanozyme, its exact molecular mechanism for electron movements within the nano-composite may be studied toward identifying specific inhibitors that could suppress the antagonistic catalysis. For example, the carbonyl groups on the carbon nanotubes are active sites for their POD mimic activity, while hydroxyl and carboxyl groups act as competitive sites. A study indicated that oxygenated group–enriched carbon nanotubes (o-CNTs) could be modified to show POD activity by blocking the carboxyl group and hydroxyl group. The modified o-CNTs were proved to demonstrate improved antibacterial effects when used in disinfection (
Statements
Author contributions
SM contributed toward the collection of literature, writing the manuscript, figures, table preparation, and editing. SN conceptualized the idea, designed the methodology, supervised the process of reviewing and editing the manuscript, and overall monitoring of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to MNNIT Allahabad for supporting the research activities carried out by our team and the support they received in compiling this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2022.880214/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AliA.LiuJ.ZhouH.LiuT.OvaisM.LiuH.et al (2021). Graphdiyne-hemin-mediated Catalytic System for Wound Disinfection and Accelerated Wound Healing. Mat. Chem. Front.5 (5), 6041–6051. 10.1039/d1qm00490e
2
AlizadehN.SalimiA.ShamT.-K.BazylewskiP.FanchiniG.FathiF.et al (2021). Hierarchical Co(OH)2/FeOOH/WO3 Ternary Nanoflowers as a Dual-Function Enzyme with pH-Switchable Peroxidase and Catalase Mimic Activities for Cancer Cell Detection and Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy. Chem. Eng. J.417, 129134. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129134
3
AnP.GaoZ.SunK.GuD.WuH.YouC.et al (2019). Photothermal-enhanced Inactivation of Glutathione Peroxidase for Ferroptosis Sensitized by an Autophagy Promotor. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces11, 42988–42997. 10.1021/acsami.9b16124
4
AnQ.SunC.LiD.XuK.GuoJ.WangC. (2013). Peroxidase-Like Activity of Fe3O4@Carbon Nanoparticles Enhances Ascorbic Acid-Induced Oxidative Stress and Selective Damage to PC-3 Prostate Cancer Cells. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces5, 13248–13257. 10.1021/am4042367
5
BarringtonR. (2013). Selenium: Depletion and Repletion. Available at: http://www.robert.barrington.net/selenium-depletion-and-repletion/ (Accessed April 10, 2021 ).
6
CaiS.JiaX.HanQ.YanX.YangR.WangC. (2017). Porous Pt/Ag Nanoparticles with Excellent Multifunctional Enzyme Mimic Activities and Antibacterial Effects. Nano Res.10, 2056–2069. 10.1007/s12274-016-1395-0
7
CaiS.YangR. (2020). Nanozymology Nanostructure Science and Technology Springer. Singapore: Sharifi.
8
CaiT.FangG.TianX.YinJ. J.ChenC.YinJ.-J.et al (2019). Optimization of Antibacterial Efficacy of Noble-Metal-Based Core-Shell Nanostructures and Effect of Natural Organic Matter. ACS Nano13, 12694–12702. 10.1021/acsnano.9b04366
9
ChenC.WangY.ZhangD. (2020). Bifunctional Nanozyme Activities of Layered Double Hydroxide Derived Co-al-ce Mixed Metal Oxides for Antibacterial Application. J. Ocean. Limnol.38, 1233–1245. 10.1007/s00343-020-0041-6
10
ChenJ.ShuY.LiH.XuQ.HuX. (2018). Nickel Metal-Organic Framework 2D Nanosheets with Enhanced Peroxidase Nanozyme Activity for Colorimetric Detection of H2O2. Talanta189, 254–261. 10.1016/j.nantod.2019.05.00710.1016/j.talanta.2018.06.075
11
ChenS.QuanY.YuY.-L.WangJ.-H. (2017). Graphene Quantum Dot/silver Nanoparticle Hybrids with Oxidase Activities for Antibacterial Application. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng.3, 313–321. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00644
12
ChenZ.JiH.LiuC.BingW.WangZ.QuX. (2016). A Multinuclear Metal Complex Based DNase-Mimetic Artificial Enzyme: Matrix Cleavage for Combating Bacterial Biofilms. Angew. Chem.128, 10890–10894. 10.1002/ange.201605296
13
ChenZ.WangZ.RenJ.QuX. (2018b). Enzyme Mimicry for Combating Bacteria and Biofilms. Acc. Chem. Res.51, 789–799. 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00011
14
ChengH.LinS.MuhammadF.LinY.-W.WeiH. (2016). Rationally Modulate the Oxidase-like Activity of Nanoceria for Self-Regulated Bioassays. ACS Sens.1, 1336–1343. 10.1021/acssensors.6b00500
15
ChengX.ZhangS.LiuH.ChenH.ZhouJ.ChenZ.et al (2020). Biomimetic Metal-Organic Framework Composite-Mediated Cascade Catalysis for Synergistic Bacteria Killing. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces12, 36996–37005. 10.1021/acsami.0c12159
16
ChongY.HuangJ.XuX.YuC.NingX.FanS.et al (2020). Hyaluronic Acid-Modified Au-Ag Alloy Nanoparticles for Radiation/Nanozyme/Ag+ Multimodal Synergistically Enhanced Cancer Therapy. Bioconjugate Chem.31, 1756–1765. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00224
17
ChongY.LiuQ.GeC. (2021). Advances in Oxidase-Mimicking Nanozymes: Classification, Activity Regulation and Biomedical Applications. Nano Today37, 101076. 10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101076
18
DavidsonP. M.CekmerH. B.MonuE. A.MonuE. A. (2015). The Use of Natural Antimicrobials in Food. Knoxville, TN, USA: University of Tennessee, 1–27. 10.1016/b978-1-78242-034-7.00001-3
19
DingH.HuB.ZhangB.ZhangH.YanX.NieG.et al (2020). Carbon-based Nanozymes for Biomedical Applications. Nano Res.14, 570–583. 10.1007/s12274-020-3053-9
20
DingS.HeL.BianX.-w.TianG. (2020). Metal-organic Frameworks-Based Nanozymes for Combined Cancer Therapy. Nano Today35, 100920. 10.1016/j.nantod.2020.100920
21
DongS.DongY.JiaT.LiuS.LiuJ.YangD.et al (2020). GSH‐Depleted Nanozymes with Hyperthermia‐Enhanced Dual Enzyme‐Mimic Activities for Tumor Nanocatalytic Therapy. Adv. Mat.32, 2002439. 10.1002/adma.202002439
22
FanK.XiJ.FanL.WangP.ZhuC.TangY.et al (2018). In Vivo guiding Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Nanozyme for Tumor Catalytic Therapy. Nat. Commun.9, 1–11. 10.1038/s41467-018-03903-8
23
FanL.SunP.HuangY.XuZ.LuX.XiJ.et al (2020). One-Pot Synthesis of Fe/N-Doped Hollow Carbon Nanospheres with Multienzyme Mimic Activities against Inflammation. ACS Appl. Bio Mat.3, 1147–1157. 10.1021/acsabm.9b01079
24
FanL.XuX.ZhuC.HanJ.GaoL.XiJ.et al (2018). Tumor Catalytic-Photothermal Therapy with Yolk-Shell Gold@Carbon Nanozymes. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces10, 4502–4511. 10.1021/acsami.7b17916
25
FangR.LiuJ. (2020). Cleaving DNA by Nanozymes. J. Mat. Chem. B8, 7135–7142. 10.1039/D0TB01274B
26
FengL.LiuB.Wangd.QianC.ZhouW.LiuJ.et al (2021). An Ultrasmall SnFe2O4 Nanozyme with Endogenous Oxygen Generation and Glutathione Depletion for Synergistic Cancer Therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater.31, 2006216. 10.1002/adfm.202006216
27
FengW.HanZ.WangR.GaoX.HuP.YueW.et al (2019). Nanocatalysts‐augmented and Photothermal‐enhanced Tumor‐specific Sequential Nanocatalytic Therapy in Both NIR‐I and NIR‐II Biowindows. Adv. Mat.31, 1805919. 10.1002/adma.201805919
28
FuS.WangS.ZhangX.QuA.LiuZ.YuX.et al (2017). Structural Effect of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles on Peroxidase-like Activity for Cancer Therapy. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces154, 239–245. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.03.038
29
FuS.YangR.ZhangL.LuW.DuG.CaoY.et al (2020). Biomimetic CoO@ AuPt Nanozyme Responsive to Multiple Tumor Microenvironmental Clues for Augmenting Chemodynamic Therapy. Biomaterials257, 120279. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120279
30
GaoS.LinH.ZhangH.YaoH.ChenY.ShiJ. (2019). Nanocatalytic Tumor Therapy by Biomimetic Dual Inorganic Nanozyme‐catalyzed Cascade Reaction. Adv. Sci.6, 1801733. 10.1002/advs.201801733
31
GargB.BishtT.LingY.-C. (2015). Graphene-Based Nanomaterials as Efficient Peroxidase Mimetic Catalysts for Biosensing Applications: An Overview. Molecules20, 14155–14190. 10.3390/molecules200814155
32
GhasemlouM.DaverF.LvanovaE. P.RhimW.AdhikariB. (2019). Switchable Dual-Function and Bioresponsive Materials to Control Bacterial Infections. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces11, 22897–22914. 10.1021/acsami.9b05901
33
GomaaE. Z. (2021). Nanozymes: A Promising Horizon for Medical and Environmental Applications. J. Clus. Sci.1–23. 10.1007/s10876-021-02079-4
34
GuoJ.WangY.ZhaoM. (2019). Target-directed Functionalized Ferrous Phosphate-Carbon Dots Fluorescent Nanostructures as Peroxidase Mimetics for Cancer Cell Detection and ROS-Mediated Therapy. Sens. Actuators. B Chem.297, 126739. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.126739
35
HalbusA. F.HorozovT. S.PanouvV. N. (2017). Colloid Particle Formulations for Antimicrobial Applications. Adv. colloid interface Sci.249, 134–148. 10.1016/j.cis.2017.05.012
36
HaungY.RenJ.QuX. (2019). Nanozymes: Classification, Catalytic Mechanisms, Activity Regulation, and Applications. Che. Rev.119, 4357–4412. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00672
37
HeL.NiQ.MuJ.FanW.LiuL.WangZ.et al (2020). Solvent-assisted Self-Assembly of a Metal–Organic Framework Based Biocatalyst for Cascade Reaction Driven Photodynamic Therapy. J. Am. Chem Soc.142, 6822–6832. 10.1021/jacs.0c02497
38
HergetK.HubachP.PuschS.DeglmannP.GötzH.GorelikT. E.et al (2017). Haloperoxidase Mimicry by CeO2− X Nanorods Combats Biofouling. Adv. Mater29, 1603823. 10.1002/adma.201603823
39
HuC.WangJ.LiuS.CaiL.ZhouY.LiuX.et al (2020). Hyaluronic Acid-Modified Au–Ag Alloy Nanoparticles for Radiation/Nanozyme/Ag+ Multimodal Synergistically Enhanced Cancer Therapy. Bioconj. Chem.31, 1756–1765. 10.1021/acsami.0c19584
40
HuM.KorscheltL.VielM.WiesmannN.KapplM.BriegerJ.et al (2018). Nanozymes in Nanofibrous Mats with Haloperoxidase-like Activity to Combat Biofouling. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces.10, 44722–44730. 10.1021/acsami.8b16307
41
HuW.YounisM. R.ZhouY.WangC.XiaX. H. (2020). Situ Fabrication of Ultrasmall Gold nanoparticles/2D MOFs Hybrid as Nanozyme for Antibacterial Therapy. Small16, 2000553. 10.1002/smll.202000553
42
HuangQ.ZhangS.ZhangH.HanY.LiuH.RenF.et al (2019). Boosting the Radiosensitizing and Photothermal Performance of Cu2–X Se Nanocrystals for Synergetic Radiophotothermal Therapy of Orthotopic Breast Cancer. ACS Nano113, 1342–1353. 10.1021/acsnano.8b06795
43
HuangY.LiuY.ShahS.KimD.SoroA. S.ItoT.et al (2021). Precision Targeting of Bacterial Pathogen via Bi-functional Nanozyme Activated by Biofilm Microenvironment. Biomaterials268, 120581. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120581
44
JanaD.WangD.BindraA. K.GuoY.LiuJ.ZhaoY. (2021). Ultrasmall Alloy Nanozyme for Ultrasound-And Near-Infrared Light-Promoted Tumor Ablation. ACS Nano15, 7774–7782. 10.1021/acsnano.1c01830
45
JiangD.NiD.RosenkransZ. T.HuangP.YanX.CaiW. (2019). Nanozyme: New Horizons for Responsive Biomedical Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev.48, 3683–3704. 10.1039/C8CS00718G
46
JiangX.LiuK.LiQ.LiuM.YangM.ChenX. (2021). B-doped Core–Shell Fe@ BC Nanozymes: Active Site Identification and Bacterial Inhibition. Chem. Comm.202 (57), 1623–1626. 10.1039/D0CC06692C
47
JinS.WengL.LiZ.YangZ.ZhuL.ShiJ.et al (2020). Nanoscale Dual-Enzyme Cascade Metal–Organic Frameworks through Biomimetic Mineralization as ROS Generators for Synergistic Cancer Therapy. J. Mat. Chem. B8, 4620–4626. 10.1039/D0TB00357C
48
KarimN.SinghM.WeeerathungeP.BianP.ZhengR.DekiwadiaC.et al (2018). Visible-light-triggered Reactive-Oxygen-Species-Mediated Antibacterial Activity of Peroxidase-Mimic CuO Nanorods. ACS Appl. Nano, Mat.1, 1694–1704. 10.1021/acsanm.8b00153
49
KhulbeK.KarmakarK.GhoshS.ChandraK.ChakravorttyD.MugeshG. (2020). Nanoceria-Based Phospholipase-Mimetic Cell Membrane Disruptive Antibiofilm Agents. ACS Appl. Bio Mater3, 4316–4328. 10.1021/acsabm.0c00363
50
KongF.BaiH.MaM.WangC.XuH.GuN.et al (2021). Fe3O4@ Pt Nanozymes Combining with CXCR4 Antagonists to Synergistically Treat Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Nano Today37, 101106. 10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101106
51
LaukovaL.KonecnaB.JanovicovaL.VlkovaB.CelecP. (2020). Deoxyribonucleases and Their Applications in Biomedicine. Biomolecules.10, 1036. 10.3390/biom10071036
52
LeeJ. Y.FarhaO. K.RobertsJ.SheidtK. A.NguyenS. B. T.HuppJ. T. (2009). Metal–organic Framework Materials as Catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev.38, 1450. 10.1039/B807080F
53
LiD.GuoQ.DingL.ZhangW.ChengL.WangY.et al (2020). Bimetallic CuCo2S4 Nanozymes with Enhanced Peroxidase Activity at Neutral Ph for Combating Burn Infections. Chem. Bio. Chem.21, 2620–2627. 10.1002/cbic.202000066
54
LiJ.LeiY.QingZ.ZouZ.ZhangY.SunH.et al (2020). Al Centre-Powered Graphitic Nanozyme with High Catalytic Efficiency for pH-independent Chemodynamic Therapy of Cancer. Chem. Comm.56, 6285–6288. 10.1039/D0CC01331E
55
LiJ.ZhouC.ZhangJ.XuF.ZhengY.WangS.et al (2021). Photo-induced Tumor Therapy Using MnO2/IrO2-PVP Nano-Enzyme with TME-Responsive Behaviors. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces205, 111852. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111852
56
LiL.LiuH.BianJ.ZhangX.FuY.LiZ.et al (2020). Ag/Pd Bimetal Nanozyme with Enhanced Catalytic and Photothermal Effects for ROS/hyperthermia/chemotherapy Triple-Modality Antitumor Therapy. Chem. Eng. J.397, 125438. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125438
57
LiM.ZhangH.HouY.WangX.XueC.LiW.et al (2020). State-of-the-art Iron-Based Nanozymes for Biocatalytic Tumor Therapy. Nanoscale Horiz.5, 202–217. 10.1039/C9NH00577C
58
LiS.ShangL.XuB.WangS.GuK.WuQ.et al (2019). A Nanozyme with Photo‐enhanced Dual Enzyme‐like Activities for Deep Pancreatic Cancer Therapy. Angew. Chem.131, 12754–12761. 10.1002/ange.201904751
59
LiY.MaW.SunJ.LinM.NiuY.YangX.et al (2020). Electrochemical Generation of Fe3C/N-Doped Graphitic Carbon Nanozyme for Efficient Wound Healing In Vivo. Carbon159, 149–160. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.11.093
60
LiY.ZhuW.LiJ. (2021). Research Progress in Nanozyme-Based Composite Materials for Fighting against Bacteria and Biofilms. Colloids Surf. B198, 111465. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111465
61
LiangM.YanX. (2019). Nanozymes: from New Concepts, Mechanisms, and Standards to Applications. Acc. Chem. Res.52, 2190–2200. 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00140
62
LiangY.WangM.ZhangZ.RenG.LiuY.WuS.et al (2019). Facile Synthesis of ZnO QDs@ GO-CS Hydrogel for Synergetic Antibacterial Applications and Enhanced Wound Healing. Chem. Eng. J.378, 122043. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122043
63
LinJ.HuJ.WangW.LiuK.ZhouC.LiuZ.et al (2021). Thermo and Light-Responsive Strategies of Smart Titanium-Containing Composite Material Surface for Enhancing Bacterially Anti-adhesive Property. Chem. Eng. J.407, 125783. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125783
64
LiuC.ZhangM.GengH.ZhangP.ZhangZ.ZhouY.et al (2021). NIR Enhanced Peroxidase-like Activity of Au@ CeO2 Hybrid Nanozyme by Plasmon-Induced Hot Electrons and Photothermal Effect for Bacteria Killing. Appl. Catal. B Environ.295, 120317. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120317
65
LiuL.WangC.LiY.QuiL.ZhouS.CuiP.et al (2021). Manganese Dioxide Nanozyme for Reactive Oxygen Therapy of Bacterial Infection and Wound Healing. Biomater. Sci.2021 (9), 5965–5976. 10.1039/D1BM00683E
66
LiuQ.ZhangA.WangR.ZhangQ.CuiD. (2021). A Review on Metal- and Metal Oxide-Based Nanozymes: Properties, Mechanisms, and Applications. Nano-Micro Lett.13, 1–53. 10.1007/s40820-021-00674-8
67
LiuS.XuJ.XingY.YanT.YuS.SunH.et al (2021). Nanozymes as Efficient Tools for Catalytic Therapeutics. View, 3(2):20200147. 10.1002/VIW.20200147
68
LiuX.YanZ.ZhangY.LiuZ.SunY.RenJ.et al (2019). Two-dimensional Metal–Organic Framework/enzyme Hybrid Nanocatalyst as a Benign and Self-Activated Cascade Reagent for In Vivo Wound Healing. ACS Nano13, 5222–5230. 10.1021/acsnano.8b09501
69
LiuY.ShiQ.ZhangY.JingJ.PeiJ. (2020). One-step Facile Synthesis of Au@ Copper–Tannic Acid Coordination Core–Shell Nanostructures as Photothermally-Enhanced ROS Generators for Synergistic Tumour Therapy. New J. Chem.44, 19262–19269. 10.1039/D0NJ04460A
70
LiuY.ZhouM.CaoW.WangX.WangQ.LiS. (2019). Light-responsive Metal–Organic Framework as an Oxidase Mimic for Cellular Glutathione Detection. Anal. Chem.91, 8170–8175. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b00512
71
LiuZ.WangF.RenJ.QuX. (2019). A Series of MOF/Ce-based Nanozymes with Dual Enzyme-like Activity Disrupting Biofilms and Hindering Recolonization of Bacteria. Biomaterials208, 21–31. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.04.007
72
MaX.RenX.GuoX.FuC.WuQ.TanL.et al (2019). Multifunctional Iron-Based Metal− Organic Framework as Biodegradable Nanozyme for Microwave Enhancing Dynamic Therapy. Biomaterials,214119223. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119223
73
MajiS. K.MandalA. K.NguyenK. T.BorahP.ZhaoY. (2015). Cancer Cell Detection and Therapeutics Using Peroxidase-Active Nanohybrid of Gold Nanoparticle-Loaded Mesoporous Silica-Coated Grapheme. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces7, 9807–9816. 10.1021/acsami.5b01758
74
MeiL.ZhuS.LiuY.YinW.YinW.GuZ.et al (2021). An Overview of the Use of Nanozymes in Antibacterial Applications. Chem. Eng. J.418, 129431. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129431
75
MengX.FanK.YanX. (2019). Nanozymes: an Emerging Field Bridging Nanotechnology and Enzymology. Sci. China Life Sci.62, 1543–1546. 10.1007/s11427-019-1557-8
76
MingJ.ZhuT.YangW.ShiY.HaungD.LiJ.et al (2020). Pd@ Pt-GOx/HA as a Novel Enzymatic Cascade Nanoreactor for High-Efficiency Starving-Enhanced Chemodynamic Cancer Therapy. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces12, 51249–51262. 10.1021/acsami.0c15211
77
MirhosseiniM.FarA. S.HakimianF.HaghiralsadatB. F.FatemiS. K.DashtestaniF. (2020). Core-shell Au@ Co-fe Hybrid Nanoparticles as Peroxidase Mimetic Nanozyme for Antibacterial Application. Process Biochem.95, 131. 10.1016/j.procbio.2020.05.003
78
MuQ.SunY.GuoA.XuX.QinB.CaiA. (2021). A Bifunctionalized NiCo2O4-Au Composite: Intrinsic Peroxidase and Oxidase Catalytic Activities for Killing Bacteria and Disinfecting Wound. J. Hazard. Mater.402, 123939. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123939
79
NavyathaB.SinghS.NaraS. (2021). AuPeroxidase Nanozymes: Promises and Applications in Biosensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. Biosens. Bioelectron.175, 112882. 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112882
80
NieX.XiaL.WangH. L.ChenG.WuB.ZengT. Y.et al (2019). Photothermal Therapy Nanomaterials Boosting Transformation of Fe (III) into Fe (II) in Tumor Cells for Highly Improving Chemodynamic Therapy. ACS Appl. Mat. Iinterfaces11, 31735–31742. 10.1021/acsami.9b11291
81
PengC.LiuJ.GuoL. (2020). Oxygen Vacancy-Enhanced Photothermal Performance and Reactive Oxygen Species Generation for Synergistic Tumour Therapy. Chem. Comm.56, 11259–11262. 10.1039/D0CC0253610.1039/d0cc02536d
82
QiuH.PuF.LiuZ.LiuX.DongK.LiuC.et al (2020). Hydrogel-based Artificial Enzyme for Combating Bacteria and Accelerating Wound Healing. Nano Res.13, 496–502. 10.1007/s12274-020-2636-9
83
RenT.YangM.WangK.ZhangY.HeJ. (2018). CuO Nanoparticles-Containing Highly Transparent and Superhydrophobic Coatings with Extremely Low Bacterial Adhesion and Excellent Bactericidal Property. ACS Appl.Mater. Interfaces10, 25717–25725. 10.1021/acsami.8b09945
84
SangY.LiW.LiuH.ZhangL. (2019). Construction of Nanozyme‐hydrogel for Enhanced Capture and Elimination of Bacteria. Adv. Funct. Mat.29, 1900518. 10.1002/adfm.201900518
85
ShanJ.LiX.YangK.XiuW.WenW.ZhangY.et al (2019). Efficient Bacteria Killing by Cu2WS4 Nanocrystals with Enzyme-like Properties and Bacteria-Binding Ability. ACS Nano13, 13797–13808. 10.1021/acsnano.9b03868
86
ShanJ.YangK.XiuW.QuiQ.DaiS.YuwenL.et al (2020). Cu2MoS4 Nanozyme with NIR‐II Light Enhanced Catalytic Activity for Efficient Eradication of Multidrug‐Resistant Bacteria. Small6, 2001099. 10.1002/smll.202001099
87
SharifiM.HosseinaliS. H.YousefvandP.SalihiA.ShekhaM. S.AzizF. M. (2020). Gold Nanozyme: Biosensing and Therapeutic Activities. Mater Sci. Eng. C Mater Biol. Appl.108, 110422. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110422
88
ShiC.LiY.GuN. (2020). Iron‐Based Nanozymes in Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Chem. Bio. Chem.21, 2722. 10.1002/cbic.202000094
89
SunD.PangX.ChengY.MingJ.XiangS.ZhangC.et al (2020). Ultrasound-switchable Nanozyme Augments Sonodynamic Therapy against Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infection. ACS Nano14, 2063–2076. 10.1021/acsnano.9b08610.1021/acsnano.9b08667
90
SunH.RenR.QuX. (2020). Nanostructure Science and Technology. Singapore: Springer, 171. 10.1007/978-981-15-1490-6_7
91
TaoY.JuE. (2015). Bifunctionalized Mesoporous Silica‐supported Gold Nanoparticles: Intrinsic Oxidase and Peroxidase Catalytic Activities for Antibacterial Applications. Adv. Mat.27, 1097. 10.1002/adma.201405105
92
TripathiK. M.AhnH. T.ChungM.LeX. A.SainiD.BhatiA.et al (2020). N, S, and P-Co-Doped Carbon Quantum Dots: Intrinsic Peroxidase Activity in a Wide pH Range and its Antibacterial Applications. ACS Biomater. Sci.Eng.6, 5527–5537. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00831
93
TwiltonJ.LeC.ZhangP.ShawH. S.EvansS. W.MacmilanD. W. C. (2017). The Merger of Transition Metal and Photocatalysis. Nat. Rev. Chem.11, 1–19. 10.1038/s41570-017-0052
94
ValenciaL.KumarS.JalvoB.MautnerA.AlvarezG. S.MathewA. P. (2018). Fully Bio-Based Zwitterionic Membranes with Superior Antifouling and Antibacterial Properties Prepared via Surface-Initiated Free-Radical Polymerization of Poly (Cysteine Methacrylate). J. Mat. Chem. A6, 16361–16370. 10.1039/C8TA06095A
95
VallabaniN. V. S.VinuA.SinghS.KarakotiA. (2020). Tuning the ATP-Triggered Pro-oxidant Activity of Iron Oxide-Based Nanozyme towards an Efficient Antibacterial Strategy. J. colloid. Interface Sci.567, 154. 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.01.099
96
VetrF.Moradi‐ShoeiliZ.ÖzkarS. (2018). Oxidation of O‐phenylenediamine to 2, 3‐diaminophenazine in the Presence of Cubic Ferrites MFe2O4 (M= Mn, Co, Ni, Zn) and the Application in Colorimetric Detection of H2O2. Appl. Organo. Chem.32, e4465. 10.1002/aoc.4465
97
WanX.SongL.PanW.ZhongH.LiN.TangB. (2020). Tumor-targeted Cascade Nanoreactor Based on Metal–Organic Frameworks for Synergistic Ferroptosis–Starvation Anticancer Therapy. ACS Nano14, 11017–11028. 10.1021/acsnano.9b07789
98
WangD.JanaD.ZhaoY. (2020i). Metal–organic Framework Derived Nanozymes in Biomedicine. Acc. Chem. Res.53, 1389–1400. 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00268
99
WangH.ChengL.MaS.DingL.ZhangW.XuZ.et al (2020h). Self-assembled Multiple-Enzyme Composites for Enhanced Synergistic Cancer Starving–Catalytic Therapy. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces.12, 20191–20201. 10.1002/adma.201805919
100
WangH.WanK.ShiX. (2019). Recent Advances in Nanozyme Research. Adv. Mat.31, 1805368. 10.1002/adma.201805368
101
WangJ.WangY.ZhangD.ChenC. (2020a). Intrinsic Oxidase-like Nanoenzyme Co4S3/Co(OH)2 Hybrid Nanotubes with Broad-Spectrum Antibacterial Activity. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces.12, 29614. 10.1021/acsami.0c05141
102
WangJ.WangY.ZhangD.XuC.XingR. (2020b). Dual Response Mimetic Enzyme of Novel Co4S3/Co3O4 Composite Nanotube for Antibacterial Application. J. Haz. Mat.392, 122278. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122278
103
WangL.GaoF.WangA.ChenX.LiH.ZhangX.et al (2020c). Defect‐Rich Adhesive Molybdenum Disulfide/rGO Vertical Heterostructures with Enhanced Nanozyme Activity for Smart Bacterial Killing Application. Adv. Mat.32, 2005423. 10.1002/adma.202005423
104
WangL.GuanS.WengY.XuS. M.LuH.MengX.et al (2019a). Highly Efficient Vacancy-Driven Photothermal Therapy Mediated by Ultrathin MnO2 Nanosheets. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces1111, 6267–6275. 10.1021/acsami.8b20639
105
WangL.LiB.YangH.LinZ.ChenZ.LiZ.et al (2020d). Efficient Elimination of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria Using Copper Sulfide Nanozymes Anchored to Graphene Oxide Nanosheets. Nano Res.13, 2156. 10.1007/s12274-020-2824-7
106
WangL.ZhangX.YuX.GaoF.ShenZ.ZhangX.et al (2019b). An All‐organic Semiconductor C3N4/PDINH Heterostructure with Advanced Antibacterial Photocatalytic Therapy Activity. Adv. Mat.31, 1901965. 10.1002/adma.201901965
107
WangQ.ZhangL.ShangC.DongS. (2016). Triple-enzyme Mimetic Activity of Nickel–Palladium Hollow Nanoparticles and Their Application in Colorimetric Biosensing of Glucose. Chem. Comm.52, 5410–5413. 10.1039/C6CC00194G
108
WangT.ZhangH.Liu.H.YuanQ.RenF.HanY.et al (2020j). Boosting H2O2‐guided Chemodynamic Therapy of Cancer by Enhancing Reaction Kinetics through Versatile Biomimetic Fenton Nanocatalysts and the Second Near‐infrared Light Irradiation. Adv. Func. Mater2020 (30), 1906128. 10.1002/adfm.201906128
109
WangT.BaiQ.ZhuZ.XiaoH.JiangF.DuF.et al (2021a). Graphdiyne-supported Palladium-Iron Nanosheets: A Dual-Functional Peroxidase Mimetic Nanozyme for Glutathione Detection and Antibacterial Application. Chem. Eng. J.413, 127537. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127537
110
WangX.FanL.SunY.WangX.ZhongX.ShiQ.et al (2020e). Biodegradable Nickel Disulfide Nanozymes with GSH-Depleting Function for High-Efficiency Photothermal-Catalytic Antibacterial Therapy. Iscience23, 101281. 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101281
111
WangX.HuY.WeiH. (2016a). Nanozymes in Bionanotechnology: from Sensing to Therapeutics and beyond. Inorg. Chem. Front.3, 41–60. 10.1039/C5QI00240K
112
WangX.GuoW.HuY.WuJ.WeiH. (2016b). Nanozymes: Next Wave of Artificial EnzymesNew York. NY: USASpringer.
113
WangX.XiongT.CuiM.GuanX.YuanJ.WangZ.et al (2020f). Targeted Self-Activating Au-Fe3O4 Composite Nanocatalyst for Enhanced Precise Hepatocellular Carcinoma Therapy via Dual Nanozyme-Catalyzed Cascade Reactions. Appl. Mater. Today21, 100827. 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100827
114
WangX.ZhongX.LeiH.GengY.ZhaoQ.GongF.et al (2019c). Hollow Cu2Se Nanozymes for Tumor Photothermal-Catalytic Therapy. Chem. Mat. Chem. Mat.31, 6174–6186. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01958
115
WangX.ZhouX.YangK.LiQ.WanR.HuG.et al (2021b). Peroxidase-and UV-Triggered Oxidase Mimetic Activities of the UiO-66-NH 2/chitosan Composite Membrane for Antibacterial Properties. Biomater. Sci.9, 2647–2657. 10.1039/d0bm01960g
116
WangY.ChenC.ZhangD.WangJ. (2020g). Bifunctionalized Novel Co-V MMO Nanowires: Intrinsic Oxidase and Peroxidase like Catalytic Activities for Antibacterial Application. Appl. Catal. B Envir.261, 118256. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118256
117
WangY.LiH.GuoL. (2019). A Cobalt-Doped Iron Oxide Nanozyme as a Highly Active Peroxidase for Renal Tumor Catalytic Therapy. RSC Adv.9, 18815–18822. 10.1039/C8RA05487H
118
WangZ.DongK.LiuZ.ZhangY.ChenZ.SunH.et al (2017). Activation of Biologically Relevant Levels of Reactive Oxygen Species by Au/g-C3n4 Hybrid Nanozyme for Bacteria Killing and Wound Disinfection. Biomaterials113, 145–157. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.041
119
WangZ.ZhangY.JuE.LiuZ.CaoF.ChenZ.et al (2018). Biomimetic Nanoflowers by Self-Assembly of Nanozymes to Induce Intracellular Oxidative Damage against Hypoxic Tumors. Nat. Comm.9, 1–14. 10.1038/s41467-018-05798-x
120
WeiC.LiuY.ZhuX.ChenX.ZhouY.YuanG.et al (2020). Iridium/ruthenium Nanozyme Reactors with Cascade Catalytic Ability for Synergistic Oxidation Therapy and Starvation Therapy in the Treatment of Breast Cancer. Biomaterials238, 119848. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119848
121
WeiF.CuiX.WangZ.DongC.LiJ.HanX.et al (2021). Recoverable Peroxidase-like Fe3O4@ MoS2-Ag Nanozyme with Enhanced Antibacterial AbilityChem. Eng. J.408, 127240. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127240
122
WeiZ.ZhangY.WangL.WangZ.ChenS.BaoJ.et al (2021). Photoenhanced Dual-Functional Nanomedicine for Promoting Wound Healing: Shifting Focus from Bacteria Eradication to Host Microenvironment Modulation. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces13, 32316–32331. 10.1021/acsami.1c08875
123
WenM.OuyangJ.WeiC.LiH.ChenW.LiuY. N. (2019). Artificial Enzyme Catalyzed Cascade Reactions: Antitumor Immunotherapy Reinforced by NIR‐II Light. Ang. Chem. Inter. Ed.58, 17425–17432. 10.1002/anie.201909729
124
WuH.LiuL.SongL.MaM.GuN.ZhangY. (2019a). Enhanced Tumor Synergistic Therapy by Injectable Magnetic Hydrogel Mediated Generation of Hyperthermia and Highly Toxic Reactive Oxygen Species. ACS Nano13, 4013–14023. 10.1021/acsnano.9b06134
125
WuM.HouP.DongL.CaiL.ChenZ.ZhaoM.et al (2019b). Manganese Dioxide Nanosheets: from Preparation to Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Nanomedicine14, 4781. 10.2147/ijn.s207666
126
WuS.WangP.QinJ.PeiY.WangY. (2021). GSH‐Depleted Nanozymes with Dual‐Radicals Enzyme Activities for Tumor Synergic Therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater.,31(31) 2102160. 10.1002/adfm.202102160
127
XiJ.HaungY.ChenJ.ZhangJ.GaoL.FanL.et al (2021). Artesunate-loaded Poly (Lactic-co-glycolic Acid)/polydopamine-Manganese Oxides Nanoparticles as an Oxidase Mimic for Tumor Chemo-Catalytic Therapy. Int.J. Bio. Macromol.181, 72–81. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.03.124
128
XiJ.WeiG.AnL.XuZ.FanL. (2019a). Copper/carbon Hybrid Nanozyme: Tuning Catalytic Activity by the Copper State for Antibacterial Therapy Nano. lett9, 7645–7654. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02242
129
XiJ.WeiG.WuQ.XuZ.LiuY.HanJ.et al (2019b). Light-enhanced Sponge-like Carbon Nanozyme Used for Synergetic Antibacterial Therapy. Biomater. Sci.7, 4131. 10.1039/C9BM00705A
130
XiJ.WuQ.XuZ.WangY.ZhuB.FanL.et al (2018). Aloe-Emodin/carbon Nanoparticle Hybrid Gels with Light-Induced and Long-Term Antibacterial Activity. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng.4, 4391–4400. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00972
131
XiongX.HaungY.LinC.LiuX. Y. (2019). Recent Advances in Nanoparticulate Biomimetic Catalysts for Combating Bacteria and Biofilms. Nanoscale11, 22206–22215. 10.1039/C9NR05054J
132
XuB.CuiY.WangW.LiS.LyuC.WangW.et al (2020a). Immunomodulation‐Enhanced Nanozyme‐Based Tumor Catalytic Therapy. Adv. Mat.32, 2003563. 10.1002/adma.202003563
133
XuM.HuY.XiaoY.ZhangY.SunK.WuT.et al (2020b). Near-infrared-controlled Nanoplatform Exploiting Photothermal Promotion of Peroxidase-like and OXD-like Activities for Potent Antibacterial and Anti-biofilm Therapies. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces12(45)50260. 10.1021/acsami.0c14451
134
XuZ.QiuZ.LiuQ.HuangY.LiD.ShenX.et al (2018). Converting Organosulfur Compounds to Inorganic Polysulfides against Resistant Bacterial Infections. Nat. Commun.2018 (9), 1–13. 10.1038/s41467-018-06164-7
135
XuZ.SunP.ZhangJ.LuX.FanL.XiJ.et al (2020c). High-efficiency Platinum–Carbon Nanozyme for Photodynamic and Catalytic Synergistic Tumor Therapy. Chem. Eng. J.399, 125797. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125797
136
YanZ.BingW.DingC.DongK.RenJ.QuX. (2018). AH2O2-free Depot for Treating Bacterial Infection: Localized Cascade Reactions to Eradicate Biofilms In Vivo. NanWoscale, 1017656–17662. 10.1039/C8NR03963A
137
YangD.ChenZ.GaoZ.TamminaS. K.YangY. (2020). Nanozymes Used for Antimicrobials and Their Applications. Coll. Sur. B Biointerfaces.195, 111252. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111252
138
YangG.PhuaS. Z. F.BindraA. K.ZhaoY. (2019). Degradability and Clearance of Inorganic Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications. Adv. Mater.31, 1805730. 10.1002/adma.201805730
139
YangP.TaoJ.ChenF.ChenY.HeJ.ShenK.et al (2021c). Multienzyme‐Mimic Ultrafine Alloyed Nanoparticles in Metal Organic Frameworks for Enhanced Chemodynamic Therapy. Small17, 2005865. 10.1002/smll.202005865
140
YangR.FuS.LiR.ZhangL.XuZ.CaoY.et al (2021b). Facile Engineering of Silk Fibroin Capped AuPt Bimetallic Nanozyme Responsive to Tumor Microenvironmental Factors for Enhanced Nanocatalytic Therapy. Theranostics11, 107. 10.7150/thno.50486
141
YangW.YangX.ZhuL.ChuH.LiX. (2021a). Nanozymes: Activity Origin, Catalytic Mechanism, and Biological Application. Coord. Chem. Rev.448, 214170. 10.1016/j.ccr.2021.214170
142
YimG.KimC. Y.KangS.MinD. H.KangK. (2020). Intrinsic Peroxidase-Mimicking Ir Nanoplates for Nanozymatic Anticancer and Antibacterial Treatment. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces12, 41062–41070. 10.1021/acsami.0c10981
143
YinW.YuJ.LvF.YanL.ZhengL. R.GuZ.et al (2016). Functionalized Nano-MoS 2 with Peroxidase Catalytic and Near-Infrared Photothermal Activities for Safe and Synergetic Wound Antibacterial ApplicationsACS Nano1, 11000–11011. 10.1021/acsnano.6b05810
144
YuZ.LouR.PanW.LiN.TangB. (2020). Nanoenzymes in Disease Diagnosis and Therapy. Chem. Comm.56, 15513. 10.1039/D0CC05427E
145
ZhangC.WangJ.ChiR.ShiJ. (2019). Reduced Graphene Oxide Loaded with MoS2 and Ag3PO4 Nanoparticles/PVA Interpenetrating Hydrogels for Improved Mechanical and Antibacterial Properties. Mat. Des.183, 108166. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108166
146
ZhangL.LiuZ.DengQ.SangY.DongK.RenJ.et al (2021). Nature‐Inspired Construction of MOF@ COF Nanozyme with Active Sites in Tailored Microenvironment and Pseudopodia‐Like Surface for Enhanced Bacterial Inhibition. Ang. Chem. Inter. Ed.60, 3469–3474. 10.1002/anie.202012487
147
ZhaoP.TangZ.ChenX.HeZ.HeX.ZhangM.et al (2019). Ferrous-cysteine–phosphotungstate Nanoagent with Neutral pH Fenton Reaction Activity for Enhanced Cancer Chemodynamic Therapy. Mat. Horiz.6, 369–374. 10.1039/C8MH01176A
148
ZhaoW.LiG.TangZ. (2019). Metal-organic Frameworks as Emerging Platform for Supporting Isolated Single-Site Catalysts. Nano Today2019 (27), 178–197. 10.1016/j.nantod.2019.05.007
149
ZhaoY.DingB.XiaoX.JiangF.WangM.HouZ.et al (2020). Virus-like Fe3O4@ Bi2S3 Nanozymes with Resistance-free Apoptotic Hyperthermia-Augmented Nanozymitic Activity for Enhanced Synergetic Cancer Therapy. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces12, 11320–11328. 10.1021/acsami.9b20661
150
ZhuD.ZhuX. H.RenS. Z.LuY. D.ZhuH. L. (2020a). Manganese Dioxide (MnO2) Based Nanomaterials for Cancer Therapies and Theranostics. J. Drug Target.2020, 1–37. 10.1080/1061186X.2020.1815209
151
ZhuW.WangL.LiQ.JiaoL.YuX.GaoX.et al (2021a). Will the Bacteria Survive in the CeO2 Nanozyme-H2o2 System?Molecules26, 3747. 10.3390/molecules26123747
152
ZhuX.ChenX.HuoD.CenJ.JiaZ.LiuY.et al (2021b). A Hybrid Nanozymes In Situ Oxygen Supply Synergistic Photothermal/chemotherapy of Cancer Management. Biomaterials Sci.9, 5330–5343. 10.1039/D1BM00667C
153
ZhuX.LiuY.YuanG.GuoX.CenJ.GongY.et al (2020b). In Situ fabrication of MS@ MnO2 Hybrid as Nanozymes for Enhancing ROS-Mediated Breast Cancer Therapy.Nanoscale12. 22317. 10.1039/D0NR03931D
Summary
Keywords
nanozyme, pro-oxidative, therapeutic, antibacterial, antitumor
Citation
Maddheshiya S and Nara S (2022) Recent Trends in Composite Nanozymes and Their Pro-Oxidative Role in Therapeutics. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10:880214. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.880214
Received
21 February 2022
Accepted
20 April 2022
Published
30 May 2022
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited by
Wooram Park, Sungkyunkwan University, South Korea
Reviewed by
Jianlong Wang, Northwest A&F University, China
Chunsheng Wu, Xi’an Jiaotong University, China
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2022 Maddheshiya and Nara.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Seema Nara, seemanara@mnnit.ac.in, seemanara@gmail.com
This article was submitted to Nanobiotechnology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.