Abstract
As nanotechnology develops in the fields of mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, information and communication, and medical care, it has shown great promises. In recent years, medical nanorobots have made significant progress in terms of the selection of materials, fabrication methods, driving force sources, and clinical applications, such as nanomedicine. It involves bypassing biological tissues and delivering drugs directly to lesions and target cells using nanorobots, thus increasing concentration. It has also proved useful for monitoring disease progression, complementary diagnosis, and minimally invasive surgery. Also, we examine the development of nanomedicine and its applications in medicine, focusing on the use of nanomedicine in the treatment of various major diseases, including how they are generalized and how they are modified. The purpose of this review is to provide a summary and discussion of current research for the future development in nanomedicine.
1 Introduction
Modern medicine is studied to pursue a new interdisciplinary discipline named nanomedicine which combines nanotechnology and medicine (Zingg and Fischer, 2019; Germain et al., 2020). An application of nanotechnology in medicine is called nanomedicine, while a pharmaceutical product containing nanotechnology is known as nanomedicines. For example, a pharmaceutical containing a nanotechnology component, usually the actual drug or a vehicle that delivers it. Nanomedicine is an umbrella term for nanotechnology with medical applications, whereas “nanomedicines” are pharmaceuticals containing nanotechnology components (Hall et al., 2012).
A lecture given by Richard Feynman in 1959 at Caltech envisaged machines and devices made of individual atoms, now known as “bottom-up” nanotechnology (Olsman and Goentoro, 2018). Gerd Binnig and Harold Rohrer won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1986 for their scanning tunneling microscopy technique, which enables the picking up of individual atoms and assembling them into the desired arrangement, thus greatly enabling the development of a new technology. Carbon 60 was discovered by Richard Smalley, Robert Curl, and Harold Kroto in 1995, winning the Nobel Prize in Chemistry. As a result of their research on graphene, a two-dimensional carbon molecule made up of nanoscale atoms, Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2010.
United States and European regulatory agencies approved the first generation of nanomedicines in the mid-1990s (Ferrari, 2010). A typical application of nanomedicine is liposomes, which are nanoparticles (NPs) derived from lipid molecules, similar to the basic structure of cell membranes. With nanomedicines, cytotoxic drugs are selectively delivered to focal areas using nanotechnology, increasing drug concentrations in targeted areas, reducing damage to non-targeted areas, minimizing side effects, and achieving more therapeutic outcomes at a lower cost than conventional therapeutic modalities (Martin et al., 2020).Nanotechnology can establish new routes of drug delivery and, through controlled release systems, improve the absorption and utilization of drugs and increase the targeting rate of drugs to a greater extent than in conventional medicine.
Through the use of drug-loaded micro/nanorobots, the some drugs can be effectively tracted and penetrated into the relevant tissues. Nanotechnology has opened up new possibilities for drug delivery (Maheswari et al., 2018). In recent years, a large number of drug delivery systems have been developed, including liposomes composed of phospholipid bilayers (Liu Y. et al., 2021). Hydrophilic cores and lipophilic lipids bind hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs in liposomes, which are phospholipid vesicles. Targeting on cancer therapies, liposomes are commonly used as carriers for targeted delivery. Inorganic nanoparticles are known to carry drugs via surface coupling (Wang X. et al., 2021), dendritic polymers with shell-core properties (Kheraldine et al., 2021), as well as polymeric nanoparticles. Among the propulsion sources for drug-delivery nanorobots are magnetically driven (Hu et al., 2020; Sindhu et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2022; Li et al., 2023), which uses a magnetic field to propel the device, optically driven (Dong et al., 2016), which utilizes semiconductor-based photoinduced catalysis to provide propulsion, acoustically driven (Ahmed et al., 2015), chemically driven (Mou et al., 2016), and biologically driven (Park et al., 2017; Halder and Sun, 2019). An external field drive for micro-nanorobots can be provided by magnetic, optical, and acoustic waves. It has the advantages of easy adjustment and high controllability, but it relies more heavily on off-field devices for power. Among these types of drives, magnetic drives are the most commonly used, and compared with other micro-/nanorobot drive methods, magnetic drives influenced by magnetic field gradients and magnetic field torques possess the characteristics of being easy to acquire, easy to adjust magnetic fields, and capable of penetrating into biological tissues without significant damage. It can be used in a variety of liquid environments, which is the relatively most mature driving method. Micro-/nanorobots fabricated with magnetic drive as the power module can be broadly classified into spiral-propelled micro-/nanorobots (Walker et al., 2015), oscillating magnetic field-driven flexible micro-/nanorobots (Li et al., 2017; Xin et al., 2019; Liu J. et al., 2021; Ji et al., 2021) and other types of magnetic field-driven micro-/nanorobots, such as gradient magnetic field-driven micro-/nanorobots (Li et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2022). Researchers are also attempting to create micro-/nanorobots using a combination of magnetic drive and other drive methods at the same time due to the features such as easy adjustment of magnetic fields and non-destructive penetration into biological tissues. This can be accomplished by giving certain magnetic properties to micro-/nanorobots while applying other driving methods. In recent years, more types of magnetic nanorobots have been designed, Yu et al. have fabricated trimeric nanorobots using three magnetic Janus colloids of different diameters (Yu et al., 2022). Inspired by the biological claws of tardigrades, Li et al. have designed a magnetically driven swimming microrobots with claw geometry and a red blood cell (RBC) membrane camouflage on its surface. It achieves controlled motion and targeted dwellings in a high velocity blood flow environment, providing a new idea for the precise treatment of malignant tumors (Li et al., 2023). Micro-/nanorobots powered by light are mainly actuated by photoinduced catalysis in semiconductors, and the action of light-driven micro-/nanorobots in biological tissues can be controlled by adjusting light intensity, light frequency, light area, light duration or by enhancing photocatalytic efficiency (Wang Q. et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2021).Additionally, research on micro-/nanorobots propelled by acoustics is essential, particularly the use of ultrasonic waves that can penetrate biological tissues with greater reliability (Díez et al., 2017; Mu et al., 2021). Wang et al. described a novel intracellular antigen delivery strategy using ultrasound (US)-propelled gold nanowires (AuNWs) nanomotors modfied with a model antigen (ovalbumin, OVA). Due to the excellent biocompatibility of AuNWs nanomotors, it can improve antigen cross-presentation and cellular immunity and thus promote immune efficiency of vaccines (Wang J. et al., 2021). In terms of chemical drives, bubble propulsion mechanisms have received the most attention to date. By adjusting the intensity and pulse of UV irradiation, Mou et al. can remotely control whether or not bubbles are generated, while utilizing the photocatalytic water redox reaction on TiO2/Pt under UV irradiation16. It is important to note; however, that bubble recoil propulsion does have limitations, and the floating bubbles are unstable in most physiological environments outside of the gastrointestinal tract of human (Jang et al., 2019). As a result of their inherent limitations, nanorobots remain challenging in design and preparation today, including complex fabrication techniques, difficulties in surface modification, difficulties in flowing biofluids, and poor biocompatibility or poor biodegradability, depending on the materials (Zhang et al., 2020).
There are many applications of nanomaterials, including drug delivery, medical imaging, and other fields, that benefit from their unique physicochemical properties and photothermal effects, namely, its small size, light weight, easy adjustment, strong penetrationand non-destructive penetration into biological tissues. In recent years, nanomedicine has shown great potential for applications. For instance, nanomedicines have been widely applied. Since the first nanomedicine doxorubicin (DOX) was introduced in 1995 (Barenholz, 2012), researchers have developed a wide range of nanomedicines to date, including paclitaxel albumin nanoparticles (Chen et al., 2021) and elitecan liposomes (Wang T. et al., 2021), which are used to treat a variety of serious diseases. The use of nanomedicine for disease monitoring and minimally invasive surgery is among the many clinical applications of nanomedicine. Consequently, the development of nanomedicine in disease monitoring and minimally invasive surgery is not to be underestimated, as nanorobots have many advantages over conventional robots, including the ability to monitor and treat lesions more efficiently (Mir et al., 2017).
1.1 Clinical applications of nanomedicine
Research for nanotechnology application in the medical field has focused on the diagnosis of diseases, targeted delivery, and minimally invasive surgical procedures. As a result of their small size, light weight, flexibility, and nondestructive penetration into biological tissues, micro-/nanorobots achieve results that are difficult or even impossible to achieve by conventional mean (Fadeel and Alexiou, 2020). In terms of chemical reactivity, fluorescence, magnetic permeability, and electrical conductivity, nanomaterials demonstrate significant differences, and these properties could lead to significant advancements in the development of new drugs (Jacob et al., 2020). Imaging techniques in the biomedical field are used to monitor the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nanomedicine, as well as to improve nanomedicine-based therapeutic regimens in preclinical research (Tuguntaev et al., 2022).
1.1.1 The use of nanomedicine in the treatment of major diseases
With the unique advantages of nanotechnology, targeted drug delivery has become a reality. By delivering therapeutic drugs through nanocarriers and targeting their delivery to the focal area, it is possible to increase the concentration of therapeutic drugs in the focal area while minimizing side effects and damage to non-targeted areas. Many nanomedicines have been developed by researchers in the last few decades for different diseases, especially for some major diseases, which have greatly reduced pain and economic pressure for patients.
1.1.1.1 Oncology therapy related applications
The It is widely recognized that medical nanotechnology is a promising approach to solve cancer challenges. Worldwide, cancer is the leading cause of death, accounting for nearly 10 million (or nearly one in six) deaths, according to a report published by the World Health Organization (WHO). Among the conventional cancer treatments, surgical resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy are the most common. The current conventional treatment for cancer kills cells indiscriminately in the focal area of the body, causing severe pain to the patient during the treatment procedure (Li et al., 2020). Drug delivery via nanomedicine carriers is a viable alternative to conventional chemotherapy which suffers from poor water solubility, poor tissue targeting, and severe systemic toxic effects (Kumstel et al., 2020). Nanomedicine carriers increase drug concentration within the target area and thus improve drug utilization and efficacy by increasing the drug concentration in the target area. As well, the nano drug carriers can be administered within the tumor vasculature, thereby reducing the drug dose and the toxic side effects on other tissues and organs.
In the world, liver cancer is the sixth most common type of cancer. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has an 18% 5-year survival rate, making it the second most lethal cancer following pancreatic cancer. Its insidious onset and insensitivity to chemotherapy make its treatment unsatisfactory (Zhang X. et al., 2016). As nanodrugs are able to increase drug bioavailability and hepatic targeting while reducing side effects on normal tissues, they offer greater possibilities for treating hepatocellular carcinoma when conventional therapies are ineffective (Bakrania et al., 2021; Elnaggar et al., 2021). In the field of targeted therapies, sorafenib (SOR) was the first systemic drug to demonstrate efficacy in patients with advanced HCC and has been used as a first-line treatment for more than 10 years. SOR alone is unlikely to achieve therapeutic expectations because of its inherent toxic side effects and the development of tumor resistance. This could be caused by the development of resistant tumor variants. In addition to traditional anticancer drugs, nanomedicines can be combined together to enhance delivery, retention, and release of these drugs into target cells and tumor tissues, thereby increasing the therapeutic effectiveness of cancer treatment. The combination of SOR and adriamycin has been proven to provide better therapeutic effects in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in clinical trials. Using a hybrid lipid-polymer nanoparticle containing a tumor-targeting peptide (iRGD), Zhang J. et al. (2016) developed a (DOX) and SOR delivery system containing iRGD (see Figure 1A). In contrast to single drug delivery, the hybrid delivery system resulted in greater bioavailability of the drug, improving the effectiveness of the anti-tumor treatment. The results of this study demonstrate that nanoparticles combined with clinical anticancer drugs are capable of enhancing anti-HCC efficacy, which is a direction of future research. In addition to the combination of nanoparticles and anticancer drugs, the combination of therapeutic nucleic acids and nanoparticles has also shown promise for application. In the research of Oh et al. (2016), DOX bound by electrostatic interaction was delivered through liposomes coated with siRNA, and the combination of DOX and siRNA inhibited tumor growth (see Figure 1B). Therefore, synergistic antitumor therapy has the potential to effectively target tumor cells and improve the antitumor effect, demonstrating its great potential. A nanodrug (HA @ PDC-DOX2) was also developed and synthesized by Wang J. et al. (2020), consisting of peptide-adriamycin as the core and hyaluronic acid as the shell, to enhance the stability and targeting capability of PDC-DOX2 (see Figure 1C). A new gold nanoparticle (Do-AuNP) was successfully synthesized from the extract of Dendrobium (DO), a traditional Chinese medicine. Experimental results show Do-AuNP has better anti-tumor efficiency as compared to gold nanoparticles in either vitro or in vivo, providing a new approach (Zhao et al., 2021). One of the key directions in nanomedicine research for the future will be to combine nanoparticles with molecules, therapeutic drugs or inter-nanoparticles in order to enhance the stability, therapeutic effects, and reduce the toxic effects of nanomedicines.
FIGURE 1
In addition to being the most common malignant tumor in women, breast cancer is also the leading cause of cancer deaths in women. Researchers have developed a variety of nanomedicines using a variety of materials to solve the problem of serious side effects caused by therapeutic drugs. These nanomedicines target cancer cells specifically and do not affect normal cells. It has been reported that Cheng et al. (2021) have developed a novel nanomedicine (CuQDA/IO@HA) containing copper ions and quercetin to specifically target cancer cells via CD44 and induce specific cytotoxicity in breast cancer (BRCA)-mutated cancer cells. More importantly, CuQDA/IO@HA demonstrated no significant adverse effects on normal tissues or organs, demonstrating the ability to treat cancer cells by integrating metal ions with nanomedicines. It is possible to reapply nanodrugs by integrating metal ions. A number of nanomedicines based on nucleic acids, including DNA and RNA, have been found to be particularly effective when combined with chemotherapy. To enhance the therapeutic efficacy and targeting on breast cancer, Zhan et al. (2019) developed a novel tumor-targeting nanomedicine (AS1411-T-5-FU) that was combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) using DNA-based delivery systems (see Figure 2A). As a result, this nanomedicine is capable of targeting and killing breast cancer cells more effectively than 5-fluorouracil alone, showing DNA’s potential as a nanomedicine material. Nucleic acid nanodrugs, however, face considerable difficulties in clinical applications due to their poor biocompatibility and low drug loading efficiency. Alternatively, Howard et al. (2022) assembles herpes simplex virus (HSV1716) with magnetic nanoparticles in order to precisely target cancer cells through magnetic actuation (see Figure 2B), preventing antibodies from attacking the virus in vivo before it can act, allowing the virus to proliferate in cancer cells while accumulating immune cells in the tumor, It can improve the treatment effect of disseminated tumors by 50% by promoting antitumor immunity, inducing tumor shrinkage, and increasing survival in a homozygous mouse model of breast cancer. Each material has its own advantages and disadvantages, and it appears to be a promising direction for future research utilizing the advantages of the materials themselves to their fullest extent and utilizing chemical coupling as a means of circumventing their shortcomings.
FIGURE 2
It is extremely difficult to treat glioma using conventional therapy as the blood-brain barrier severely hinders the anticancer effects of chemotherapy on glioma. However, various specific transporters on the blood-brain barrier can be utilized as targets to deliver tumor drugs using targeted nanoparticle delivery systems (Deng et al., 2020).Hortelao et al. designed an experimental nanorobot which was modified by urease and constructed with SiO2 as a shell. It can load therapeutic drugs into tumor cells for release. As a result of loading nanobots with therapeutic drugs and releasing them in the tumor area, the drug concentration in the focal area increased and the drug utilization rate improved, and the drug was also reduced as it was released into other tissues and side effects were reduced (Llopis-Lorente et al., 2019). Therefore, it is apparent that nanodrugs are more effective at breaking through the blood-brain barrier than traditional chemotherapy treatments, which offers more treatment options for those suffering from brain diseases. The benefit of this approach is that it provides a greater variety of treatment options for brain diseases and achieves a more rapid therapeutic effect. Nevertheless, drug resistance is also a problem when treating glioma with a single drug. The combination of drugs, however, has good performance in treating glioma. The synergistic effect of the combination of therapeutic drugs and siRNA can significantly improve the anticancer effect in various cancers. In an experiment conducted by Peng et al. (2018), a targeted nanocarrier carrying temozolomide (TMZ) and anti-BCL-2 siRNA was used to assess the physicochemical properties and release profile of this drug, both in vitro and in vivo (see Figure 3A). Moreover, the drug promoted targeted drug delivery and inhibited tumor growth by activating pro-apoptotic genes in cancer cells, resulting in a significant apoptotic response and prolonging patients’ survival periods. It is necessary to develop drugs for the treatment of brain diseases that are capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier, as well as to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the drugs and to target drug resistance.
FIGURE 3
Less than 5% of pancreatic cancer patients survive 5 years after being diagnosed, making it the world’s deadliest cancer. To enhance the quality of life and prolong the survival time of patients with pancreatic cancer, Gao et al. (2020) proposed delivery of drugs by ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction (UTMD), which has significantly improved the therapeutic effect on patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Due to its high biological toxicity, however, it has some limitations when applied to patients who are in good physical condition because it places high demands on their physical function. As reported by Ding et al. (2020), a hybrid nanodrug was fabricated (Au/FeMOF@CPT NPs) with metal organic backbone nanoparticles (MOF) and gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) (see Figure 3B), which improved the stability of the nanodrug in the organism. It was effective because cancer cells contain high concentrations of phosphate, resulting in the drug’s complete release. Even though gold nanoparticles are one of the least toxic metal nanoparticles, high concentrations may be genotoxic, and drug safety needs to be considered as well (Desai et al., 2021a). Nanomedicines are also being investigated for their potential therapeutic applications in the treatment of tumors in other organs, including the lung (see Figure 3C) (Chi et al., 2019; Wang S. et al., 2020), the esophagus (Chen et al., 2020; Salapa et al., 2020), and the cervical region (Sadoughi et al., 2021; Venkatas and Singh, 2021). Considering nanomedicines’ excellent targeting capability, future research should focus on improving the bioavailability of drugs, increasing their concentration in tumor sites, addressing possible drug resistance, and increasing their therapeutic potential.
1.1.1.2 Endocrine disease treatment applications
Our standard of living has been improving in recent years, and the lifestyle and diet structure have also been changing. As a result, the incidence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and other diseases has been increasing, while traditional hypoglycemic drugs have proved difficult to treat diabetes, causing great inconvenience to patients (Vessby et al., 2000). Additionally, diabetic patients are more likely to require a prolonged hospital stay and have a higher cost of hospitalization, particularly if they have chronic complications (Karahalios et al., 2018). For the purpose of alleviating the side effects associated with long-term insulin injections and the administration of first-line diabetes treatments, including biguanides, sulfonylureas, and glycosidase inhibitors, a variety of nanoparticle-based delivery systems have been developed to replace conventional medications (Chatzipirpiridis et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2018). According toBanerjee et al. (2020), plasmid lipocalin (pADN)-based nanodrugs were developed for treating insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes in experiments with diabetic rats (see Figure 4A). They avoided enzymatic degradation of the gene product and significantly improved insulin sensitivity for up to 6 weeks, which is an effective therapeutic method. Due to the pleiotropic nature of the secreted glucagon-like peptide (GLP), L cells have attracted the attention of researchers, as Beloqui et al. (2016) A nanostructured lipid carrier was added to L cells, and the experimental results showed that nanostructured lipid carriers can increase GLP-1 secretion in murine and human L cells, which results in increased GLP-1 secretion for diabetes treatment purposes. In order to treat diabetes, exosomes can be used as nanomaterials (see Figure 4B). It has been found that these agents are capable of influencing both glucose and lipid levels, primarily through promoting glucose metabolism, enhancing lipid metabolism, and reducing lipid deposition (Ashrafizadeh et al., 2022). Therefore, they can serve as a new strategy for the treatment of diabetes.
FIGURE 4
A major focus of current research is the use of nanomedicines to treat diabetic complications, in addition to diabetes itself. Patients with diabetes are at risk for a variety of complications, including diabetic foot, diabetic neuropathy, diabetic nephropathy, diabetic retinopathy, etc. (Desai et al., 2021b; Balogh et al., 2022) One of the most common, serious, and expensive complications of diabetes is diabetic foot. As a result of hyperglycemia and abnormal glucose metabolism, diabetic patients develop lesions, neuropathy, and infection, making diabetic foot wounds difficult to heal and leading to long-term inflammation (Tatulashvili et al., 2020). In the case of diabetic feet, conventional treatment methods, such as blood glucose control and wound debridement, fail to heal the wound in a timely manner, and once infection occurs untreated, amputation is the only option (Mariadoss et al., 2022). Therefore, a drug capable of improving poor wound healing is urgently needed for diabetic. There has been some discussion regarding the potential value of nanomaterials in wound healing and infection control in this regard (Pormohammad et al., 2021; Simos et al., 2021). The development of polymeric, metallic, and ceramic nanomaterials for the treatment of acute and chronic wounds has been found to accelerate the regeneration of damaged dermal and epidermal tissues (Parani et al., 2016). Nanoparticles of silver (AgNPs) synthesized by Varaprasad et al. (2010) are suitable for use as antimicrobial dressings and wound dressings, which represents an important advancement in the field of antimicrobial dual-ion technology. By disrupting bacterial biofilms and causing aggregation of blood cells and platelets, the peptide-modified NFRH developed by Qiu et al. (2021) may accelerate wound healing by disrupting bacterial biofilms (see Figure 4C). A growing number of diabetic patients are living in China, which has led to an increased need for treatment of diabetes and its complications, especially the severe complications of diabetes.
1.1.1.3 Circulatory system therapeutic applications
The pathogenesis of many diseases, including deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and ischemic stroke, involves thrombosis (Priya et al., 2021). In clinical practice, antiplatelet agents, anticoagulants, and fibrinolytic drugs are commonly used in the treatment of thrombosis, including arterial and venous thrombosis (Loyau et al., 2018; Khoukaz et al., 2020). In contrast, traditional thrombolytic drugs have a short half-life, low bioavailability, poor targeting, and low output efficiency, and the treatment must be repeated multiple times. An efficient drug is urgently needed to combat the encroachment of thrombotic disease in patients. Researchers have thus turned their attention to the treatment of thrombosis after nanomedicines were first introduced for the treatment of oncological diseases. Worldwide, ischemic stroke is one of the leading causes of severe disability and death, posing a serious public health problem as well as an economic burden on families of patients. Blood supply to the brain from blood vessels is impeded by thrombosis, resulting in a sudden reduction in cerebral blood flow caused by a series of pathological changes. These changes ultimately lead to cerebral ischemia, which can result in severe disability and even death (Ma et al., 2021). Consequently, a variety of nanomedicines have been developed with the goal of improving the effectiveness and precision of thrombosis treatments (Su et al., 2020). Timely and effective thrombolytic therapy is of great clinical significance, and nanomedicines such as liposomes, polymer nanoparticles, and magnetic nanoparticles offer great potential (Liu et al., 2018). Furthermore, Xu et al. (2019) developed a dextran-derived polymeric nanoparticle-based nanocarrier (tP-NP-rtPA/ZL006e) for simultaneous delivery of tissue fibrinogen and dextran-derived polymeric nanoparticles (see Figure 5A). Compared to conventional free drugs, this nanodrug reduced the ischemic area more effectively in in vitro and in vivo experiments. By contrast, the small extracellular vesicle (sEV)-based drug delivery system developed by Loch-Neckel et al. (2022) is endogenous nanovesicles that have excellent targeting capabilities and are naturally biocompatible (see Figure 5B). These devices are more advantageous in treating CNS diseases, providing greater benefits for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease, brain tumors and other diseases, as they can cross the blood-brain barrier and target specific nerve cells. Nanomaterials have also shown great potential when combined with traditional Chinese medicine. Salvianolic acid B(SAB), a water-soluble phenolic acid derived from Salvia miltiorrhiza, a traditional Chinese medicine. According to Zhang S. et al. (2022), the RR@SABNPs are a brain-targeted bionanopharmaceutical made of bovine serum albumin nanoparticles that contain salvianolic acid and functionalized red blood cell membranes that contain salvianolic acid. In addition to stability, it is biocompatible as well. Influenced by single-cell organisms, Zhang et al.propose a strategy to use programmed alternating magnetic fields to enable amoeboid microrobots to more effectively deliver thrombolytic drugs and unblock embolic vessels (Zhang et al., 2023).
FIGURE 5
Furthermore, in a mouse model of infarction, the drug significantly scavenged excess reactive oxygen species and reduced infarct size. It is anticipated that the number of patients who suffer from severe disability or even death as a result of thrombosis will be greatly reduced.
1.1.2 Other disease treatment related applications
Nanomedicine has also demonstrated promising results in the research of diseases other than tumors and blood clots mentioned above. As the sixth leading cause of death in humans, pneumonia is caused by a variety of pathogens such as bacteria, viruses, and fungi that cause damage to lung tissue or interstitial lung. Despite their effectiveness in treating common pneumonia, conventional drugs are less effective in treating some critically ill patients, such as those with acute lung injury. In light of this, the development of new drugs for the specific treatment of critically ill patients is one of the most hotly debated topics in current research (Muhammad et al., 2022). According to Mukhaerjee et al., silver Prussian blue (PB) analog nanoparticles (SPBANPs), a new nanopharmaceutical formulation developed by combining PB with silver salts (silver nitrate). The SPBANPs demonstrated excellent antibacterial activity in Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and Gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus subtilis) (Mukherjee et al., 2020). A worldwide pandemic of COVID-19 has caused the development of vaccines, and nanotechnology has been an integral part of the development of efficient, safe, and relatively affordable vaccines based on nanomedicine principles in order to control the pandemic (Al-Hatamleh et al., 2021; Shapiro, 2021). It has been determined that vaccines based on nanomedicine principles will be effective, safe, and cost-effective in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic across the globe. Nanotechnology has played an integral part in developing such vaccines (Tang et al., 2017; Niu et al., 2021). William M. Pardridge develops a drug that both encapsulates plasmid DNA encoding a therapeutic gene and crosses the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The drug uses Trojan horse liposomes (THL), also known as polyethylene glycolated immunoliposomes, formed by encapsulation of plasmid DNA inside polyethylene glycolated liposomes with a net anionic charge, and THL is developed as a receptor-targeted nanomedicine for the treatment of human central nervous system disorders. (Pardridge, 2020).
1.2 Diagnostic applications of nanomedicine
Through the advancement of nanotechnology, nanomaterials of various types, shapes, and sizes are being applied to biosensors in order to enhance their sensitivity and accuracy in detecting diseases (Spychalska et al., 2020). Salahandish et al. (2018), for instance, used graphene, a material which is highly thermally stable and has good gas barrier properties. For the detection of miRNA-21, which is a breast cancer marker, a graphene-based (NFG) nanosensor with silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) is developed with high sensitivity, which could be useful for the early diagnosis of breast cancer (see Figure 6A). Zhang et al. proposed the use of magnetic properties of iron oxide nanoparticles as MRI contrast enhancer. Such particles can form magnetic fields and are easily deformed and manipulated. This method makes MRI of lesion sites easier to visualize and also effectively reduces the amount of contrast agent used (Zhang Z. et al., 2022).
FIGURE 6
During the treatment of diabetes, it is imperative to develop new methods of monitoring blood glucose levels, since the current methods are relatively cumbersome to diagnose and monitor. Biosensors based on nanoparticles offer increased glucose monitoring sensitivity, allowing clinicians and researchers to quantify diabetes levels and make further diagnoses with greater accuracy (Kovatchev, 2018; Wang Y. et al., 2021).
1.3 Surgical procedures utilizing nanomedicine
It is also possible to use nanomedicine technology in minimally invasive surgical procedures. Since micro-/nanorobots are small and lightweight, they offer increased flexibility in narrow biological tissue environments. Macro-/nanorobots can perform a number of precise micro-operations and reduce tissue damage during surgery, as well as perform functions that macro-/nanorobots cannot.
In a live rabbit eye, Chatzipirpiridis et al. successfully operated a micro-/nanorobot wirelessly by rotating around its axis and injecting a 23-gauge needle into the central vitreous fluid (see Figure 6B) (Chatzipirpiridis et al., 2015). Researchers insert nanorobots into rat brains through the nose to perform different types of movements by regulating the magnetic field. They are currently investigating the insertion of magnetic microrobots into neural tissue to induce behavioral changes in small mammals (Soto et al., 2020). In the future, it may be possible to develop micro-/nanorobots that can treat diseases in other narrow areas of the human body. In this study, it has been shown that micro-/nanorobots can significantly reduce tissue damage during surgery owing to their own properties, and their use in minimally invasive surgery holds great promise. It has demonstrated excellent potential in experimental studies, even though it has not yet been able to be scaled up to the clinical setting.
2 Nanomedicine faces numerous challenges
In Micro-/nanorobots are much smaller than macro-robots and they can pass through biological tissues to reach the lesion, allowing precise micro-operations and accurate drug delivery in complex biological environments. There is a great deal of potential in nanotechnology for the future. Medical nanotechnology still faces many problems in practical clinical applications despite the numerous breakthroughs and innovations in nanotechnology and materials science in recent decades.
1) Micro-/nanorobots are used to deliver nanomedicines due to their small size, allowing them to penetrate deep into biological tissues with less damage and to cross the blood-brain barrier to reach sites which conventional drugs are unable to reach. However, their drug-carrying capacity is slightly insufficient, and they can also have difficulty transporting large molecules. Therefore, further research is needed to promote nanorobots to break through in vivo biological barriers and achieve multi-drug carriage more effectively.
2) A crucial aspect of the development process is the selection of nanomaterials. In particular, the preparation of micro-/nanorobots that utilize naturally occurring microorganisms in nature must address the problem of life support for microorganisms as well as the provision of nutrients necessary for their growth. It is important to consider the toxicity, degradability and applicability of the materials used in the preparation of micro-/nanorobots using artificial technologies (such as 3D printing) and whether they can be widely used.
3) Depending on the degree of lesions, the appropriate amount of nanomedicine should be released, as well as how to provide timely and accurate feedback regarding whether the expected effect has been achieved. When the drug has been delivered and released into the body, it should be completely and safely discharged outside the body.
4) Currently, cross-disciplinary cooperation and exchange are insufficient; basic research needs to be improved, and some important theoretical issues involving nanomedicines still require further study.
3 Overview and outlook
With continuous innovations and breakthroughs in nanomedicine technology, diagnosis and treatment at the microscopic level are increasingly becoming a reality, and nanomedicine technology is widely used in clinical treatment, disease diagnosis and other medical fields. However, nanomedicine does not yet have a perfect solution to many major diseases, and safety issues and other problems remain challenging. However, the system is not yet perfect and some problems still exist. In the field of nanomedicine technology, solving the material, functional and safety-related problems of nanocarriers is still a hot spot for research with wider potential applications, which deserves more in-depth exploration and research.
Statements
Author contributions
ZQ and CN conceived the idea of the study. SX and CN analyzed the data. YL and LW interpreted the results and wrote the paper. ZQ and CN discussed the results and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work is supported by The President’s Fund of the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University (HYDSYYZ201502); Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (LH 2020H063); Outstanding Youth Fund of the Fourth Hospital of Harbin Medical University (HYDSYYXQN202008); Heilongjiang Provincial Academy of Science and Technology Cooperation Project (YS18C06); Heilongjiang Province Postdoctoral Fund (LBH-Z21170); Sichuan Provincial Western Psychiatric Association’s CSPC Leading Scientific Research Project.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AhmedD.LuM.NourhaniA.LammertP. E.StrattonZ.MuddanaH. S.et al (2015). Selectively manipulable acoustic-powered microswimmers. Sci. Rep.5, 9744. 10.1038/srep09744
2
Al-HatamlehM. A. I.HatmalM. M.AlshaerW.RahmanE. N. S. E. A.Mohd-ZahidM. H.Alhaj-QasemD. M.et al (2021). COVID-19 infection and nanomedicine applications for development of vaccines and therapeutics: An overview and future perspectives based on polymersomes. Eur. J. Pharmacol.896, 173930. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.173930
3
AshrafizadehM.KumarA.ArefA.ZarrabiA.MostafaviE. (2022). Exosomes as promising nanostructures in diabetes mellitus: From insulin sensitivity to ameliorating diabetic complications. Int. J. Nanomedicine17, 1229–1253. 10.2147/IJN.S350250
4
BakraniaA.ZhengG.BhatM. (2021). Nanomedicine in hepatocellular carcinoma: A new frontier in targeted cancer treatment. Pharmaceutics14, 41. 10.3390/pharmaceutics14010041
5
BaloghM.JanjicJ. M.ShepherdA. J. (2022). Targeting neuroimmune interactions in diabetic neuropathy with nanomedicine. Antioxidants Redox Signal.36, 122–143. 10.1089/ars.2021.0123
6
BanerjeeA.SharmaD.TrivediR.SinghJ. (2020). Treatment of insulin resistance in obesity-associated type 2 diabetes mellitus through adiponectin gene therapy. Int. J. Pharm.583, 119357. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119357
7
BarenholzY. (2012). Doxil® — the first FDA-approved nano-drug: Lessons learned. J. Control. Release160, 117–134. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.03.020
8
BeloquiA.AlhouayekM.CarradoriD.VanvarenbergK.MuccioliG. G.CaniP. D.et al (2016). A mechanistic study on nanoparticle-mediated glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretion from enteroendocrine L cells. Mol. Pharm.13, 4222–4230. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b00871
9
ChatzipirpiridisG.ErgenemanO.PokkiJ.UllrichF.FuscoS.OrtegaJ. A.et al (2015). Electroforming of implantable tubular magnetic microrobots for wireless ophthalmologic applications. Adv. Healthc. Mat.4, 209–214. 10.1002/adhm.201400256
10
ChenH.HuangS.WangH.ChenX.ZhangH.XuY.et al (2021). Preparation and characterization of paclitaxel palmitate albumin nanoparticles with high loading efficacy: An in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor study in mouse models. Drug Deliv.28, 1067–1079. 10.1080/10717544.2021.1921078
11
ChenJ.ZhouL.WangC.SunY.LuY.LiR.et al (2020). A multifunctional SN38-conjugated nanosystem for defeating myelosuppression and diarrhea induced by irinotecan in esophageal cancer. Nanoscale12, 21234–21247. 10.1039/D0NR06266A
12
ChengH.-W.ChiangC.-S.HoH.-Y.ChouS.-H.LaiY.-H.ShyuW.-C.et al (2021). Dextran-modified quercetin-Cu(II)/Hyaluronic acid nanomedicine with natural poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor and dual targeting for programmed synthetic lethal therapy in triple-negative breast cancer. J. Control. Release329, 136–147. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.11.061
13
ChiC.LiF.LiuH.FengS.ZhangY.ZhouD.et al (2019). Docetaxel-loaded biomimetic nanoparticles for targeted lung cancer therapy in vivo. J. Nanopart Res.21, 144. 10.1007/s11051-019-4580-8
14
DengG.PengX.SunZ.ZhengW.YuJ.DuL.et al (2020). Natural-killer-cell-inspired nanorobots with aggregation-induced emission characteristics for near-infrared-II fluorescence-guided glioma theranostics. ACS Nano14, 11452–11462. 10.1021/acsnano.0c03824
15
DesaiN.KoppisettiH.PandeS.ShuklaH.SirsatB.DitaniA. S.et al (2021b). Nanomedicine in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy. Future Med. Chem.13, 663–686. 10.4155/fmc-2020-0335
16
DesaiN.MominM.KhanT.GharatS.NingthoujamR. S.OmriA. (2021a). Metallic nanoparticles as drug delivery system for the treatment of cancer. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv.18, 1261–1290. 10.1080/17425247.2021.1912008
17
DíezP.Esteban-Fernández de ÁvilaB.Ramírez-HerreraD. E.VillalongaR.WangJ. (2017). Biomedical nanomotors: Efficient glucose-mediated insulin release. Nanoscale9, 14307–14311. 10.1039/C7NR05535H
18
DingY.XuH.XuC.TongZ.ZhangS.BaiY.et al (2020). A nanomedicine fabricated from gold nanoparticles‐decorated metal–organic framework for cascade chemo/chemodynamic cancer therapy. Adv. Sci.7, 2001060. 10.1002/advs.202001060
19
DongR.ZhangQ.GaoW.PeiA.RenB. (2016). Highly efficient light-driven TiO 2 –Au Janus micromotors. ACS Nano10, 839–844. 10.1021/acsnano.5b05940
20
ElnaggarM. H.AbushoukA. I.HassanA. H. E.LamloumH. M.BenmeloukaA.MoatamedS. A.et al (2021). Nanomedicine as a putative approach for active targeting of hepatocellular carcinoma. Seminars Cancer Biol.69, 91–99. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.08.016
21
FadeelB.AlexiouC. (2020). Brave new world revisited: Focus on nanomedicine. Biochem. Biophysical Res. Commun.533, 36–49. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.08.046
22
FerrariM. (2010). Frontiers in cancer nanomedicine: Directing mass transport through biological barriers. Trends Biotechnol.28, 181–188. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.12.007
23
GaoJ.NesbittH.LoganK.BurnettK.WhiteB.JackI. G.et al (2020). An ultrasound responsive microbubble-liposome conjugate for targeted irinotecan-oxaliplatin treatment of pancreatic cancer. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.157, 233–240. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.10.012
24
GermainM.CaputoF.MetcalfeS.TosiG.SpringK.ÅslundA. K. O.et al (2020). Delivering the power of nanomedicine to patients today. J. Control. Release326, 164–171. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.07.007
25
HalderA.SunY. (2019). Biocompatible propulsion for biomedical micro/nano robotics. Biosens. Bioelectron.139, 111334. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111334
26
HallR. M.SunT.FerrariM. (2012). A portrait of nanomedicine and its bioethical implications. J. Law. Med. Ethics40, 763–779. 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00705.x
27
HowardF. H. N.Al-JanabiH.PatelP.CoxK.SmithE.VadakekolathuJ.et al (2022). Nanobugs as drugs: Bacterial derived nanomagnets enhance tumor targeting and oncolytic activity of HSV-1 virus. Small18, 2104763. 10.1002/smll.202104763
28
HuM.GeX.ChenX.MaoW.QianX.YuanW.-E. (2020). Micro/nanorobot: A promising targeted drug delivery system. Pharmaceutics12, 665. 10.3390/pharmaceutics12070665
29
JacobS.NairA. B.ShahJ. (2020). Emerging role of nanosuspensions in drug delivery systems. Biomater. Res.24, 3. 10.1186/s40824-020-0184-8
30
JangD.JeongJ.SongH.ChungS. K. (2019). Targeted drug delivery technology using untethered microrobots: A review. J. Micromech. Microeng.29, 053002. 10.1088/1361-6439/ab087d
31
JiF.LiT.YuS.WuZ.ZhangL. (2021). Propulsion gait analysis and fluidic trapping of swinging flexible nanomotors. ACS Nano15, 5118–5128. 10.1021/acsnano.0c10269
32
KarahaliosA.SomarajahG.HamblinP. S.KarunajeewaH.JanusE. D. (2018). Quantifying the hidden Healthcare cost of diabetes mellitus in Australian hospital patients: Cost of diabetes in Australian hospitals. Intern Med. J.48, 286–292. 10.1111/imj.13685
33
KheraldineH.RachidO.HabibA. M.Al MoustafaA.-E.BenterI. F.AkhtarS. (2021). Emerging innate biological properties of nano-drug delivery systems: A focus on pamam dendrimers and their clinical potential. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.178, 113908. 10.1016/j.addr.2021.113908
34
KhoukazH. B.JiY.BraetD. J.VadaliM.AbdelhamidA. A.EmalC. D.et al (2020). Drug targeting of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 inhibits metabolic dysfunction and atherosclerosis in a murine model of metabolic syndrome. ATVB40, 1479–1490. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.313775
35
KovatchevB. (2018). The year of transition from research to clinical practice. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol.14, 74–76. 10.1038/nrendo.2017.170
36
KumstelS.VasudevanP.PalmeR.ZhangX.WendtE. H. U.DavidR.et al (2020). Benefits of non-invasive methods compared to telemetry for distress analysis in a murine model of pancreatic cancer. J. Adv. Res.21, 35–47. 10.1016/j.jare.2019.09.002
37
LiT.LiJ.MorozovK. I.WuZ.XuT.RozenI.et al (2017). Highly efficient freestyle magnetic nanoswimmer. Nano Lett.17, 5092–5098. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b02383
38
LiT.LiJ.ZhangH.ChangX.SongW.HuY.et al (2016). Magnetically propelled fish-like nanoswimmers. Small12, 6098–6105. 10.1002/smll.201601846
39
LiT.YangC.WeiZ.PeiD.JiangG. (2020). <p>Recent advances of magnetic nanomaterials in the field of oncology</p>. OTT13, 4825–4832. 10.2147/OTT.S243256
40
LiT.YuS.SunB.LiY.WangX.PanY.et al (2023). Bioinspired claw-engaged and biolubricated swimming microrobots creating active retention in blood vessels. Sci. Adv.9, eadg4501. 10.1126/sciadv.adg4501
41
LiuJ.YuS.XuB.TianZ.ZhangH.LiuK.et al (2021). Magnetically propelled soft microrobot navigating through constricted microchannels. Appl. Mater. Today25, 101237. 10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101237
42
LiuS.FengX.JinR.LiG. (2018). Tissue plasminogen activator-based nanothrombolysis for ischemic stroke. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv.15, 173–184. 10.1080/17425247.2018.1384464
43
LiuY.Castro BravoK. M.LiuJ. (2021). Targeted liposomal drug delivery: A nanoscience and biophysical perspective. Nanoscale Horiz.6, 78–94. 10.1039/D0NH00605J
44
Llopis-LorenteA.García-FernándezA.Murillo-CremaesN.HortelãoA. C.PatiñoT.VillalongaR.et al (2019). Enzyme-powered gated mesoporous silica nanomotors for on-command intracellular payload delivery. ACS Nano13, 12171–12183. 10.1021/acsnano.9b06706
45
Loch-NeckelG.MatosA. T.VazA. R.BritesD. (2022). Challenges in the development of drug delivery systems based on small extracellular vesicles for therapy of brain diseases. Front. Pharmacol.13, 839790. 10.3389/fphar.2022.839790
46
LoyauS.Ho-Tin-NoéB.BourrienneM.-C.BoulaftaliY.Jandrot-PerrusM. (2018). Microfluidic modeling of thrombolysis: Effect of antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents on TPA (Tissue-Type plasminogen activator)-induced fibrinolysis. ATVB38, 2626–2637. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.118.311178
47
MaH.JiangZ.XuJ.LiuJ.GuoZ.-N. (2021). Targeted nano-delivery strategies for facilitating thrombolysis treatment in ischemic stroke. Drug Deliv.28, 357–371. 10.1080/10717544.2021.1879315
48
MaheswariR.Rani GnanamalarS. S.GomathyV.SharmilaP. (2018). Cancer detecting nanobot using positron emission tomography. SSRN J.2018, 3227782. 10.2139/ssrn.3227782
49
MariadossA. V. A.SivakumarA. S.LeeC.-H.KimS. J. (2022). Diabetes mellitus and diabetic foot ulcer: Etiology, biochemical and molecular based treatment strategies via gene and nanotherapy. Biomed. Pharmacother.151, 113134. 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113134
50
MartinJ. D.CabralH.StylianopoulosT.JainR. K. (2020). Improving cancer immunotherapy using nanomedicines: Progress, opportunities and challenges. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol.17, 251–266. 10.1038/s41571-019-0308-z
51
MirM.IshtiaqS.RabiaS.KhatoonM.ZebA.KhanG. M.et al (2017). Nanotechnology: From in vivo imaging system to controlled drug delivery. Nanoscale Res. Lett.12, 500. 10.1186/s11671-017-2249-8
52
MouF.KongL.ChenC.ChenZ.XuL.GuanJ. (2016). Light-controlled propulsion, aggregation and separation of water-fuelled TiO 2/Pt Janus submicromotors and their “on-the-fly” photocatalytic activities. Nanoscale8, 4976–4983. 10.1039/C5NR06774J
53
MuG.ZhaoJ.DongH.WuJ.GrattanK. T. V.SunT. (2021). Structural parameter study of dual transducers-type ultrasonic levitation-based transportation system. Smart Mater. Struct.30 (4), 045009. 10.1088/1361-665x/abe4e4
54
MuhammadW.ZhaiZ.WangS.GaoC. (2022). Inflammation-modulating nanoparticles for pneumonia therapy. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol14, e1763. 10.1002/wnan.1763
55
MukherjeeS.KotcherlakotaR.HaqueS.DasS.NuthiS.BhattacharyaD.et al (2020). Silver prussian blue analogue nanoparticles: Rationally designed advanced nanomedicine for multifunctional biomedical applications. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng.6, 690–704. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01693
56
NiuL.FangY.YaoX.ZhangY.WuJ.ChenD. F.et al (2021). TNFα activates MAPK and Jak-Stat pathways to promote mouse Müller cell proliferation. Exp. Eye Res.202, 108353. 10.1016/j.exer.2020.108353
57
OhH.JoH.-Y.ParkJ.KimD.-E.ChoJ.-Y.KimP.-H.et al (2016). Galactosylated liposomes for targeted Co-delivery of doxorubicin/vimentin SiRNA to hepatocellular carcinoma. Nanomaterials6, 141. 10.3390/nano6080141
58
OlsmanN.GoentoroL. (2018). There’s (still) plenty of room at the bottom. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.54, 72–79. 10.1016/j.copbio.2018.01.029
59
ParaniM.LokhandeG.SinghA.GaharwarA. K. (2016). Engineered nanomaterials for infection control and healing acute and chronic wounds. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces8, 10049–10069. 10.1021/acsami.6b00291
60
PardridgeW. M. (2020). Brain delivery of nanomedicines: Trojan horse liposomes for plasmid DNA gene therapy of the brain. Front. Med. Technol.2, 602236. 10.3389/fmedt.2020.602236
61
ParkB.-W.ZhuangJ.YasaO.SittiM. (2017). Multifunctional bacteria-driven microswimmers for targeted active drug delivery. ACS Nano11, 8910–8923. 10.1021/acsnano.7b03207
62
PengY.HuangJ.XiaoH.WuT.ShuaiX. (2018). Codelivery of temozolomide and SiRNA with polymeric nanocarrier for effective glioma treatment. IJN13, 3467–3480. 10.2147/IJN.S164611
63
PormohammadA.MonychN. K.GhoshS.TurnerD. L.TurnerR. J. (2021). Nanomaterials in wound healing and infection control. Antibiotics10, 473. 10.3390/antibiotics10050473
64
PriyaV.ViswanadhM. K.MehataA. K.JainD.SinghS. K.MuthuM. S. (2021). Targeted nanotherapeutics in the prophylaxis and treatment of thrombosis. Nanomedicine16, 1153–1176. 10.2217/nnm-2021-0058
65
QiuW.HanH.LiM.LiN.WangQ.QinX.et al (2021). Nanofibers reinforced injectable hydrogel with self-healing, antibacterial, and hemostatic properties for chronic wound healing. J. Colloid Interface Sci.596, 312–323. 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.02.107
66
SadoughiF.HallajzadehJ.AsemiZ.MansourniaM. A.YousefiB. (2021). Nanocellulose-based delivery systems and cervical cancer: Review of the literature. CPD27, 4707–4715. 10.2174/1381612827666210927110937
67
SalahandishR.GhaffarinejadA.OmidiniaE.ZargartalebiH.Majidzadeh-AK.NaghibS. M.et al (2018). Label-free ultrasensitive detection of breast cancer MiRNA-21 biomarker employing electrochemical nano-genosensor based on sandwiched AgNPs in PANI and N-doped graphene. Biosens. Bioelectron.120, 129–136. 10.1016/j.bios.2018.08.025
68
SalapaJ.BushmanA.LoweK.IrudayarajJ. (2020). Nano drug delivery systems in upper gastrointestinal cancer therapy. Nano Converg.7, 38. 10.1186/s40580-020-00247-2
69
ShapiroR. S. (2021). COVID-19 vaccines and nanomedicine. Int. J. Dermatol60, 1047–1052. 10.1111/ijd.15673
70
SimosY. V.SpyrouK.PatilaM.KaroutaN.StamatisH.GournisD.et al (2021). Trends of nanotechnology in type 2 diabetes mellitus treatment. Asian J. Pharm. Sci.16, 62–76. 10.1016/j.ajps.2020.05.001
71
SindhuR. K.KaurH.KumarM.SofatM.YaparE. A.EsenturkI.et al (2021). The ameliorating approach of nanorobotics in the novel drug delivery systems: A mechanistic review. J. Drug Target.29, 822–833. 10.1080/1061186X.2021.1892122
72
SotoF.WangJ.AhmedR.DemirciU. (2020). Medical robotics: Medical micro/nanorobots in precision medicine. Adv. Sci.7 (21), 2070117. 10.1002/advs.202070117
73
SpychalskaK.ZającD.BalutaS.HalickaK.CabajJ. (2020). Functional polymers structures for (Bio)Sensing application—a review. Polymers12, 1154. 10.3390/polym12051154
74
SuM.DaiQ.ChenC.ZengY.ChuC.LiuG. (2020). Nano-medicine for thrombosis: A precise diagnosis and treatment strategy. Nano-Micro Lett.12, 96. 10.1007/s40820-020-00434-0
75
TangH.XiangD.WangF.MaoJ.TanX.WangY. (2017). 5-ASA-Loaded SiO2 nanoparticles-a novel drug delivery system targeting therapy on ulcerative colitis in mice. Mol. Med. Rep.15, 1117–1122. 10.3892/mmr.2017.6153
76
TatulashviliS.FagherazziG.DowC.CohenR.FosseS.BihanH. (2020). Socioeconomic inequalities and type 2 diabetes complications: A systematic review. Diabetes and Metabolism46, 89–99. 10.1016/j.diabet.2019.11.001
77
TuguntaevR. G.HussainA.FuC.ChenH.TaoY.HuangY.et al (2022). Bioimaging guided pharmaceutical evaluations of nanomedicines for clinical translations. J. Nanobiotechnol20, 236. 10.1186/s12951-022-01451-4
78
VaraprasadK.MohanY. M.RavindraS.ReddyN. N.VimalaK.MonikaK.et al (2010). Hydrogel-silver nanoparticle composites: A new generation of antimicrobials. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.115, 1199–1207. 10.1002/app.31249
79
VenkatasJ.SinghM. (2021). Nanomedicine-mediated optimization of immunotherapeutic approaches in cervical cancer. Nanomedicine16, 1311–1328. 10.2217/nnm-2021-0044
80
VessbyB.KarlströmB.ÖhrvallM.JärviA.AnderssonA.BasuS. (2000). Diet, nutrition and diabetes mellitus. Upsala J. Med. Sci.105, 151–160. 10.1517/03009734000000061
81
WalkerD.KüblerM.MorozovK. I.FischerP.LeshanskyA. M. (2015). Optimal length of low Reynolds number nanopropellers. Nano Lett.15, 4412–4416. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01925
82
WangH.YuS.LiaoJ.QingX.SunD.JiF.et al (2022). A robot platform for highly efficient pollutant purification. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.10, 903219. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.903219
83
WangJ.LiuX.QiY.LiuZ.CaiY.DongR. (2021). Ultrasound-propelled nanomotors for improving antigens cross-presentation and cellular immunity. Chem. Eng. J.416 (4), 129091. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129091
84
WangJ.QianY.XuL.ShaoY.ZhangH.ShiF.et al (2020). Hyaluronic acid-shelled, peptide drug conjugate-cored nanomedicine for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Mater. Sci. Eng. C117, 111261. 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111261
85
WangQ.DongQ.YangQ.WangJ.XuS.CaiY. (2020). Highly efficient visible-light-driven oxygen-vacancy-based Cu2+1O micromotors with biocompatible fuels. Nanoscale Horizons5 (2), 325–330. 10.1039/c9nh00592g
86
WangS.YanC.ZhangX.ShiD.ChiL.LuoG.et al (2018). Antimicrobial peptide modification enhances the gene delivery and bactericidal efficiency of gold nanoparticles for accelerating diabetic wound healing. Biomater. Sci.6, 2757–2772. 10.1039/C8BM00807H
87
WangS.ZhangF.YuG.WangZ.JacobsonO.MaY.et al (2020). Zwitterionic-to-Cationic charge conversion polyprodrug nanomedicine for enhanced drug delivery. Theranostics10, 6629–6637. 10.7150/thno.47849
88
WangT.HeW.DuY.WangJ.LiX. (2021). Redox-sensitive irinotecan liposomes with active ultra-high loading and enhanced intracellular drug release. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces206, 111967. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111967
89
WangX.ZhongX.LiJ.LiuZ.ChengL. (2021). Inorganic nanomaterials with rapid clearance for biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev.50, 8669–8742. 10.1039/D0CS00461H
90
WangY.WangC.LiK.SongX.YanX.YuL.et al (2021). Recent advances of nanomedicine-based strategies in diabetes and complications management: Diagnostics, monitoring, and therapeutics. J. Control. Release330, 618–640. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.01.002
91
XinC.YangL.LiJ.HuY.QianD.FanS.et al (2019). Conical hollow microhelices with superior swimming capabilities for targeted cargo delivery. Adv. Mat.31, 1808226. 10.1002/adma.201808226
92
XuJ.WangX.YinH.CaoX.HuQ.LvW.et al (2019). Sequentially site-specific delivery of thrombolytics and neuroprotectant for enhanced treatment of ischemic stroke. ACS Nano13, 8577–8588. 10.1021/acsnano.9b01798
93
YangQ.XuH.WenH.ZhaoH.LiuX.CaiY.et al (2021). Graphene oxide induced enhancement of light-driven micromotor with biocompatible fuels. Appl. Mater. Today22, 100943. 10.1016/j.apmt.2021.100943
94
YuS.LiT.JiF.ZhaoS.LiuK.ZhangZ.et al (2022). Trimer-like microrobots with multimodal locomotion and reconfigurable capabilities. Mater. Today Adv.14, 100231. 10.1016/j.mtadv.2022.100231
95
ZhanY.MaW.ZhangY.MaoC.ShaoX.XieX.et al (2019). DNA-based nanomedicine with targeting and enhancement of therapeutic efficacy of breast cancer cells. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces11, 15354–15365. 10.1021/acsami.9b03449
96
ZhangJ.HuJ.ChanH. F.SkibbaM.LiangG.ChenM. (2016). IRGD decorated lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles for targeted Co-delivery of doxorubicin and sorafenib to enhance anti-hepatocellular carcinoma efficacy. Nanomedicine Nanotechnol. Biol. Med.12, 1303–1311. 10.1016/j.nano.2016.01.017
97
ZhangS.LiR.ZhengY.ZhouY.FanX. (2022). Erythrocyte membrane-enveloped salvianolic acid B nanoparticles attenuate cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury. IJN17, 3561–3577. 10.2147/IJN.S375908
98
ZhangW.DengY.ZhaoJ.ZhangT.ZhangX.SongW.et al (2023). Amoeba-inspired magnetic venom microrobots. Small2023, 2207360. 10.1002/smll.202207360
99
ZhangX.LiN.ZhangS.SunB.ChenQ.HeZ.et al (2020). Emerging carrier-free nanosystems based on molecular self-assembly of pure drugs for cancer therapy. Med. Res. Rev.40, 1754–1775. 10.1002/med.21669
100
ZhangX.NgH. L. H.LuA.LinC.ZhouL.LinG.et al (2016). Drug delivery system targeting advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Current and future. Nanomedicine Nanotechnol. Biol. Med.12, 853–869. 10.1016/j.nano.2015.12.381
101
ZhangZ.WangH.YangH.SongW.DaiL.YuS.et al (2022). Magnetic microswarm for MRI contrast enhancer. Chem. Asian J.17, e202200561. 10.1002/asia.202200561
102
ZhaoS.SunD.ZhangJ.LuH.WangY.XiongR.et al (2022). Actuation and biomedical development of micro-/nanorobots – a review. Mater. Today Nano18, 100223. 10.1016/j.mtnano.2022.100223
103
ZhaoW.LiJ.ZhongC.ZhangX.BaoY. (2021). Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles from Dendrobium officinale and its anticancer effect on liver cancer. Drug Deliv.28, 985–994. 10.1080/10717544.2021.1921079
104
ZinggR.FischerM. (2019). The consolidation of nanomedicine. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol11, e1569. 10.1002/wnan.1569
Summary
Keywords
cross-disciplinary, micro-/nanorobots, nanotechnology, nanomedicine, drug delivery
Citation
Zhao Q, Cheng N, Sun X, Yan L and Li W (2023) The application of nanomedicine in clinical settings. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11:1219054. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1219054
Received
08 May 2023
Accepted
05 June 2023
Published
27 June 2023
Volume
11 - 2023
Edited by
Tianlong Li, Harbin Institute of Technology, China
Reviewed by
Renfeng Dong, South China Normal University, China
Shimin Yu, Ocean University of China, China
Xiaolong Lu, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Zhao, Cheng, Sun, Yan and Li.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Lijun Yan, ylj@hrbcu.edu.cn; Wenlan Li, lwldzd@163.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.