ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 14 July 2026

Sec. Bioprocess Engineering

Volume 14 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2026.1837262

Impact of lignin depolymerization on aerobic and anaerobic bioconversion of alkaline liquor from sugarcane bagasse

  • 1. Brazilian Biorenewables National Laboratory (LNBR), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil

  • 2. Institute of Science and Technology (ICT), Federal University of Alfenas (UNIFAL), Poços de Caldas, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Abstract

Introduction:

Lignin recalcitrance, together with its complex interactions with cellulose and hemicelluloses within the plant cell wall, remains a major barrier to efficient lignocellulosic biomass valorization. Mild alkaline pretreatment partially addresses this challenge by solubilizing lignin and acetate into a lignin-rich alkaline liquor (AL). However, the recovered lignin is largely oligomeric, limiting its direct microbial conversion.

Methods:

To evaluate strategies for improving AL bioconversion, alkaline liquor was subjected to thermochemical depolymerization under different severities, generating liquors with compositions ranging from oligomer-rich to monomer-rich profiles. The resulting streams were evaluated through two bioconversion routes: aerobic metabolism by Pseudomonas putida KT2440 and anaerobic digestion for biomethane production.

Results:

Mild to moderate depolymerization conditions (≤240 °C) improved the growth of P. putida, whereas the highest depolymerization severity strongly inhibited bacterial growth. This inhibition was associated with increased concentrations of aromatic monomers that are poorly metabolized by P. putida, including phenol and alkyl-substituted phenols. In anaerobic digestion assays, mild to moderate depolymerization yielded the highest specific methane productions, corresponding to a 10%–20% increase relative to non-depolymerized AL, while severe depolymerization conditions negatively affected methane production.

Discussion:

These findings demonstrate that controlled lignin depolymerization can enhance both aerobic and anaerobic bioconversion by balancing chemical accessibility with biological compatibility. This approach provides a promising strategy for improving lignin utilization within integrated biorefinery concepts.

Graphical Abstract

1 Introduction

Lignocellulosic biomass, an abundant and renewable resource, holds significant potential for conversion into valuable products such as biofuels and biochemicals (). Among the various types of feedstocks, sugarcane bagasse stands out due to its high availability at the processing site, especially in countries with extensive sugarcane production and biorefining such as Brazil (). However, the efficient conversion of lignocellulosic biomass is challenging due to its recalcitrant nature (). To decrease this recalcitrance, physicochemical processes are usually employed, combining different conditions of temperature, pressure and pH ().

Alkaline processes under mild conditions (typically <100 °C and atmospheric pressure) have emerged as an attractive alternative to conventional high-temperature and high-pressure acidic pretreatments (; ; ). Although they present challenges related to alkali recovery, effluent management, and overall process sustainability (), these alkaline approaches promote the solubilization of lignin and acetyl groups in the liquid fraction while preserving polysaccharides in the solid fraction, potentially reducing operational costs and minimizing the formation of inhibitory compounds that hinder cellulose hydrolysis and subsequent glucose fermentation (; ). Compared with other emerging environmentally friendly alternatives, mild alkaline processes offer practical advantages, including shorter processing times relative to biological pretreatments, as well as higher fermentative compatibility and lower costs relative to ionic liquid-based systems ().

Lignin is the most abundant renewable source of aromatic compounds and plays a crucial role in the transition from fossil-based industries to sustainable, bio-based technologies (). Lignin depolymerization aims to convert its high-molecular-weight structure into lower molecular weight fractions, producing streams enriched in monomeric aromatic compounds. These fractions can be upgraded to produce bioproducts such as renewable chemicals (), liquid (), and gaseous biofuels (). However, studies demonstrating the potential of lignin-derived streams to be used for biogas production are scarce and are usually limited to assays using model compounds to understand toxicity effects (; ; ; ; ; ).

Bio-based upgrading of lignin-derived streams can be a good alternative to valorize them (; ). Some lignin-derived monomers present in alkaline liquors from softwood (), corn stover (), and sugarcane bagasse () have been demonstrated to be compatible with aerobic bioconversion pathways aiming to produce valuable chemicals such as beta-ketoadipate, polyhydroxyalkanoates, and muconic acid. However, these studies focused on the monomeric aromatic compounds observed in alkaline liquor, overlooking acetate, and macromolecular lignin, which partly precipitates when the liquor pH is lowered. In this context, P. putida KT2440 can serve as an ideal bacterial chassis for investigating the co-valorization of acetate and aromatic compounds. This strain naturally metabolizes acetate and harbors multiple pathways () that funnel a wide range of lignin-derived aromatic compounds into central metabolites, particularly acetyl-CoA, which represents a key metabolic node shared by both acetate utilization and aromatic catabolism. Moreover, Pseudomonas putida KT2440 is a safe strain, with a versatile metabolism, resistant to harsh conditions, and which benefits from a well-developed set of genetic engineering tools, rendering it an ideal chassis for biotechnological applications (; ; ).

Anaerobic digestion is another promising bioconversion approach for lignin valorization. In the sugarcane industry, anaerobic digestion has been scaled commercially and primarily targets residues like vinasse and filter cake from 1G ethanol production. Integrating the processing of sugarcane bagasse into second-generation (2G) biorefineries introduces new potential streams for anaerobic digestion, opening opportunities to enhance efficiency and address challenges associated with seasonal operation. Recent studies have demonstrated the feasibility of digesting alkaline liquors rich in lignin alone or with vinasse or filter cake from 1G production ​(; ). However, it is still not well understood which lignin-derived compounds can be effectively metabolized under anaerobic conditions, nor how their molecular characteristics, such as molecular weight and functionalization, influence their conversion into biogas.

Submitting alkaline liquor directly to lignin depolymerization reactions, prior to the biological upgrading step, could be advantageous in terms of operational efficiency. Processing the liquor would leverage that lignin is already solubilized in an alkaline solution, with NaOH and water actively participating in bond-cleavage reactions (). However, the potential of this simplified process to improve the aerobic bioconversion efficiency of alkaline liquors has not yet been demonstrated. Another unresolved question is whether submitting alkaline liquors to lignin depolymerization reactions would improve their conversion into biogas via anaerobic digestion. Studies on the anaerobic digestion of isolated lignin-derived streams remain scarce ​(; ; ) and the slow rate of biological lignin depolymerization has been identified as a limiting factor for the industrial applicability of anaerobic digestion in lignin valorization ().

In this study, we hypothesized that depolymerization severity modulates the microbial conversion efficiency of lignin solubilized by mild alkaline pretreatment. To test this, a lignin-rich alkaline liquor obtained from sugarcane bagasse was subjected to thermochemical depolymerization under systematically varied conditions of temperature, reaction time, and O2 pressure. This approach generated liquors with distinct molecular weight distributions and compositional profiles of lignin-derived compounds. These depolymerized liquors were evaluated as substrates for (i) aerobic conversion using P. putida KT2440, and (ii) anaerobic digestion for methane production using anaerobic sludge as inoculum. Pseudomonas putida KT2440 was chosen as a model for aerobic conversion due to the extensive research using this microorganism as a biofactory to convert lignin-derived compounds into value-added molecules () whereas an anaerobic sludge from a consolidated agro-industrial facility was selected to evaluate methane production due to its scalability. By integrating quantitative chemical characterization with microbial growth and conversion assays, this study reveals how lignin depolymerization shapes the bioconversion potential of alkaline liquors, providing guidance for the development of efficient and sustainable lignin valorization strategies within biorefineries.

2 Methodology

This study aimed to evaluate two bioconversion routes using alkaline liquor (AL) and depolymerized alkaline liquors (DALs) as the main carbon source. The aerobic route assessed the metabolism of aromatic compounds and aliphatic acids by P. putida KT2440 (ATCC 47054), while the anaerobic route targeted biogas production through biochemical methane potential (BMP) assays using an inoculum from a mesophilic upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor treating poultry slaughterhouse wastewater (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1

2.1 Alkaline liquor (AL) production

To produce an alkaline liquor (AL) suitable for subsequent depolymerization and bioconversion studies, sugarcane bagasse (∼12% moisture), previously ground to ≤6 mm using a cross-beater mill (Retsch SK 100), was obtained from a sugarcane mill in São Paulo State (harvested in October 2022). The alkaline treatment was carried out in a 7.5 L Parr reactor (model 4,848) at 70 °C for 3 h, using a solid-to-liquid ratio of 1:12 (bagasse:alkaline solution) and a NaOH loading of 70 g kg-1 bagasse (pH 12.5) (). After the reaction, the supernatant was filtered, and the liquid fraction (alkaline liquor, AL) was collected for subsequent depolymerization reactions.

For chromatographic analysis (HPLC and GC-MS), an aliquot of AL was subjected to acid precipitation (AP) by adjusting the pH to 2 with 72% (w/w) H2SO4. The liquid fraction obtained after acid precipitation was hereafter referred to as ALAP. Both AL and ALAP were subsequently submitted to analyses described in Section 2.5.

2.2 Depolymerized alkaline liquors (DALs) production

To generate depolymerized alkaline liquors (DALs) for bioconversion studies, alkaline liquor (AL) from sugarcane bagasse was subjected to hydrothermal depolymerization following a 23 factorial design (8 experimental runs and 1 central point in triplicate). Reactions were performed varying temperature (180 °C–300 °C), reaction time (30–90 min), and O2 addition (0–4 bar) (). The addition of O2 (4 bar) aimed to investigate whether a mild oxidative environment would increase the yield of oxidized aromatic monomers while avoiding extensive ring-opening reactions, potentially improving substrate biocompatibility for subsequent bioconversion. Experiments were conducted in a high-pressure batch reactor (500 mL, model 4575A, Parr Instrument Company), with precise control of temperature, pressure, and agitation (Parr 4,848). The total pressures reached approximately 50 bars at 180 °C, 70 bars at 240 °C, and 120 bars at 300 °C. The conditions for all 11 depolymerization reactions are summarized in Table 1.

TABLE 1

T (°C)Time (min)O2 addition (bar)Depolymerized liquorBioconversion assay
180300DAL1Aerobic and anaerobic
180304DAL2Aerobic
180900DAL3Aerobic
180904DAL4Aerobic
240602DAL5Aerobic and anaerobic
240602DAL6Aerobic
240602DAL7Aerobic
300300DAL8Aerobic
300304DAL9Aerobic
300900DAL10Aerobic
300904DAL11Aerobic and anaerobic

Experimental conditions (temperature, time, and initial O2 added to the reaction) for the 11 depolymerization reactions that generated different Depolymerized Alkaline Liquors (DALs).

Each reaction was initiated with 250 g of alkaline liquor (AL). The reactor, sealed with a graphite gasket, was purged three times with nitrogen (N2), pressurized to 26–30 bar with N2, and subsequently adjusted with oxygen (O2, addition of 0–4 bar) to reach the desired final pressure of 30 bar. Agitation was maintained at 500 rpm throughout the entire process. After completion of the reaction, the mixture was processed according to the requirements of the subsequent biological assays.

For aerobic assays, the pH was adjusted to 2 with 72% sulfuric acid to precipitate macromolecular lignin (), and the liquid fraction (DALs) was recovered by filtration. For comparison purposes, the same procedure was applied to an AL aliquot, generating the ALAP sample. Both AL and ALAP samples were submitted to aerobic growth assays along with the DALs samples (Section 2.3). Acid precipitation was applied to remove macromolecular lignin prior to the aerobic assays, enriching the liquors in monomeric compounds, as P. putida KT2440 is known to primarily metabolize aromatic monomers ().

For anaerobic assays, in contrast, no acid precipitation was performed; only a filtration step was applied to remove dispersed solids. As the complex microbial consortium involved in anaerobic digestion exhibits diverse metabolic capabilities, we hypothesized that it would be capable of metabolizing not only monomeric species but also higher-molecular-weight aromatic compounds.

2.3 Aerobic bioconversion

Pseudomonas putida KT2440 (ATCC 47054) was used to test the bioconversion of the AL, ALAP and DAL1–DAL11, serving as a model for aerobic routes. Single colonies of P. putida were inoculated and grown on liquid LB medium (10 g L-1 peptone, 5 g L-1 yeast extract and 10 g L-1 NaCl) at 30 °C, 200 rpm. Cells were washed twice with XVM2 minimal medium (20 mM NaCl, 10 mM (NH4)2SO4, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.01 mM FeSO4.7H2O, 5 mM MgSO4, 0.16 mM KH2PO4, 0.32 mM K2HPO4, 0.3 g L-1 casamino acids) and inoculated to an initial optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.05 on XVM2 medium supplemented with the liquors. Prior to inoculation, the liquors were adjusted to pH 6.7 and filter sterilized. For each assay, the liquors (AL, ALAP and DAL1–DAL11) were diluted as necessary to achieve a standardized concentration of 1 g L-1 of total soluble aromatics, as estimated by UV-vis spectroscopy (Section 2.5.1), in an attempt to minimize the effect of variations of total aromatics loading on microbial growth.

The cultures were performed in 24-well plates with incubation and simultaneous OD600 measurement in the Tecan Spark Microplate Multimode Reader or Tecan Infinite M200 Pro at 30 °C and orbital shaking of 510 rpm. Growth package was used to calculate the specific growth rates and lag time. After 48 h of culturing, cells were harvested and the supernatant was collected for measurement of aromatic compounds and organic acids by GC-MS and HPLC, as described in the 2.5 characterization section.

2.4 Anaerobic bioconversion

The non-depolymerized liquor (AL) and three representative depolymerized liquors (DAL1, DAL5, and DAL11) were directly used for biogas production, without acid precipitation. The inoculum used in the biochemical methane potential (BMP) assays was obtained from a mesophilic upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor treating poultry slaughterhouse wastewater (Pereiras, São Paulo State, Brazil). The three liquors (DAL1, DAL5, and DAL11) were selected to represent distinct levels of depolymerization severity within the experimental design, corresponding to mild (DAL1), moderate (DAL5), and severe (DAL11) conditions.

Biogas and methane production from alkaline liquor and depolymerized liquors were evaluated using biochemical methane potential (BMP) assays in mono-digestion, where each liquor served as the sole substrate, following the VDI 4630 methodology ()​, which recommends a substrate-to-inoculum ratio of 1:2 based on total volatile solids (TVS).

Experiments were conducted in 120 mL borosilicate glass bottles with a working volume of 70 mL (50 mL headspace), incubated at 35 °C and 80 rpm. The volumes of substrate and inoculum were adjusted for each liquor to comply with a TVS-based substrate-to-inoculum ratio of 1:2, as follows: 51 mL AL + 19 mL inoculum; 54 mL DAL1 + 16 mL inoculum; 56 mL DAL5 + 14 mL inoculum; and 58 mL DAL11 + 12 mL inoculum. The TVS values for the liquors and inoculum are reported in Section 3.3. Negative controls containing only inoculum were included. The pH was adjusted to 7.0 using 1 M HCl.

Cumulative biogas production was measured using a 60 mL hypodermic syringe (Descarpack) until the biogas volume varied by less than 1% over three consecutive measurements. All assays were performed in triplicate, and standard deviation was used as the error bar for statistical analysis.

Chemical oxygen demand (COD) and solids content were determined according to Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater ()​. Biogas composition was analyzed following ​. The kinetics of cumulative methane production under each experimental condition were analyzed using the modified Gompertz equation (Equation 1) to estimate methane production potential, maximum methane production rate, and lag phase. Model fitting was performed using OriginPro 2025b. The goodness-of-fit was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R2), residual sum of squares (RSS), and root mean square error (RMSE).

Equation 1:

Where:

PCH4 (t): cumulative production of methane (NmL CH4) over time. Pmax: maximum methane production potential (NmL CH4). Rmax: maximum methane production rate (NmL CH4 d-1). λ: lag phase (d).

The specific methane production was expressed in NmL CH4 g-1 VS, corresponding to the normalized methane volume per Gram of volatile solids added. At the end of the experiments, the assays were harvested, and the supernatants were collected for quantification of aromatic compounds and organic acids by GC–MS and HPLC, as described in Section 2.5.

2.5 Characterization

2.5.1 UV–vis spectroscopy

The concentration of total soluble aromatic compounds in AL and DAL liquors was inferred by UV–vis spectroscopy at 280 nm using a Thermo Scientific Evolution 300 spectrophotometer, according to Equation 2 (; ).

Equation 2:

Where: C is the concentration of total soluble aromatic compounds in the liquors (g L-1); A280nm is the absorbance at 280 nm; fd is the dilution factor; B is the linear coefficient for sugarcane bagasse lignin (0.018, experimental value); and A is the angular coefficient corresponding to the absorptivity of sugarcane bagasse lignin (23.7 L g-1 cm-1, experimental value). Of note, this estimative must be interpreted as an apparent concentration as it does not account for potential changes in absorptivity resulting from lignin fragmentation.

2.5.2 High–performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)

HPLC was used to quantify sugars and aliphatic organic acids in ALAP, DALs (after acid precipitation and filtration), and in all biological supernatants according to the NREL Laboratory Analytical Procedure (). All samples were homogenized and filtered through a 0.22 µm Millex syringe filter (13 mm diameter), and quantification was performed by external calibration. An Agilent 1,260 Infinity high-performance liquid chromatograph equipped with a refractive index detector (35 °C) was employed for the analysis. Chromatographic separation was achieved using an Aminex HPX-87H analytical column (300 mm × 7.8 mm) with a 30 mm × 4.6 mm pre-column, maintained at 35 °C, with a flow rate of 0.6 mL min-1 and 5 mM sulfuric acid as the isocratic eluent.

2.5.3 Carbohydrate quantification

The carbohydrate content of AL was determined after acid hydrolysis followed by HPLC analysis, according to . AL was subjected to acid hydrolysis (pH adjusted to 2 with 98% sulfuric acid, 121 °C for 30 min), and the resulting hydrolysate was analyzed by HPLC as described in Section 2.5.2. Appropriate correction fractions were applied to degradation products of glucose and xylose, as described in the equations below.

The glucan content (%) was calculated using Equation 3:

Hemicellulose content was calculated using Equation 4:

2.5.4 Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS)

For the GC-MS analysis of aromatic monomers in AL, DALs (after acid precipitation and filtration), and all biological supernatants, a sample preparation protocol based on the method described by was used. Adaptations in the derivatization protocol, aimed at avoiding the use of the toxic pyridine, were compared in terms of analytical performance, including recovery, precision, and linearity, while keeping the extraction procedure identical. Specific calibration curves were constructed for each derivatization approach under the same analytical conditions. Recovery rates were close to 100% for both protocols.

2.5.4.1 AL, DALs, and aerobic assay supernatants

Samples (400 µL) were acidified with 72% H2SO4 to pH 1–2, spiked with 34 µL of 3,5-dimethylphenol (1,000 μg mL-1 in ethyl acetate, internal standard), and extracted twice with ethyl acetate (1:1, v/v). The combined organic phases were dried with ∼50 mg MgSO4, and 400 µL of the extract was derivatized with 100 µL BSTFA and 100 µL pyridine at 40 °C for 15 min before GC analysis (). Analyses were performed on a Shimadzu GC-2010 gas chromatograph coupled to a GCMS-QP2010 Ultra mass spectrometer, equipped with an Agilent DB-35M capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm). Injector temperature was 250 °C, helium was used as carrier gas at 1.5 mL min-1, injection volume was 2 µL in split mode (1:5), and the oven program was set from 50 °C to 320 °C. The GC/MS interface and ion source were maintained at 280 °C and 250 °C, respectively, with EI at 70 eV. Compounds were identified as trimethylsilyl derivatives by retention times (±0.1 min relative to standards) and mass spectra and quantified using calibration curves (2.5–165 μg mL-1) based on analyte/internal standard peak area ratios. Calibration included 30 analytical standards (≥98% purity) from Sigma-Aldrich, Alfa Aesar, Dinâmica, Synth, and Geel (Belgium).

2.5.4.2 Anaerobic assay supernatants

Samples (400 µL) were acidified with 72% H2SO4 to pH 1–2, spiked with 30 µL of 3,5-dimethylphenol (1,000 μg mL-1, internal standard), and extracted twice with ethyl acetate (400 μL and 370 µL). The combined organic phases were dried with ∼150 mg MgSO4, and 400 µL of the dried extract was derivatized with 100 µL BSTFA +0.5% TMSI at 60 °C for 40 min. Analyses were conducted on an Agilent 8890 GC coupled to a 7010C Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer, using a DB-35M column (60 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm). Injector temperature was 250 °C, helium was used as carrier gas at 1.0 mL min-1, injection volume was 1 µL in split mode (1:30). Calibration curves were constructed with 30 standards (≥98% purity), including phenol, guaiacol, catechol, vanillin, syringaldehyde, ferulic acid, and 4-coumaric acid.

2.5.4.3 Biogas analysis

Methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) were quantified using an Agilent Micro GC 990 equipped with molecular sieve and PPU modules. Column temperature was 80 °C, injector temperature 100 °C, and injection volume 1 mL, with argon as the carrier gas. Operating pressures were 200 kPa (molecular sieve) and 150 kPa (PPU). The system was operated using the manufacturer’s factory-tuned method for biogas analysis. According to the manufacturer’s specifications (Agilent Technologies), the system provides high analytical reliability, with area repeatability (relative standard deviation, RSD) of 0.033% and 0.070% for CH4 and CO2, respectively. These performance characteristics are suitable for the concentration ranges measured in the biogas samples of this study.

2.5.5 Molar Mass Distribution estimated by SEC

Representative liquor samples were analyzed for molar mass distribution by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) using a handmade Superdex 30 Prep Grade GE column (65 cm × 1.6 cm), connected to an ÄKTA automated system equipped with a UV detector (280 nm), which allow the detection of aromatic compounds. The eluent was 0.1 M NaOH, with a flow rate of 1 mL min-1 at room temperature and an injection volume of 100 µL. All samples were homogenized and filtered through a 0.22 µm Millex syringe filter (13 mm diameter) prior injection.

The total column volume (Vt) was approximately 127 mL, and the void volume (V0), determined using blue dextran, was approximately 48 mL. A set of standards with known molecular weights—including phenol (94 Da, Sigma-Aldrich), tannic acid (1701 Da, Sigma-Aldrich), and polystyrene sulfonate sodium salts (PSS; 246, 3,400, 6,000, and 10,000 Da, Agilent)—was used to correlate elution volume with molar mass, as elution volume increases with decreasing molecular weight in SEC. Chromatographic profiles were processed and plotted using Origin 9.0 software.

The elution volumes of the standards were as follows: phenol (94 Da; 94 mL), 4-coumaric acid (164 Da; 83 mL), tannic acid (1701 Da; 69 mL), and polystyrene sulfonate sodium salts (PSS, Agilent): 246 Da (81 mL), 3,400 Da (51 mL), 6,000 Da (49 mL), and 10,000 Da (48 mL). The chromatograms of the standards are provided in Supplementary Figure S1.

2.6 Statistical analysis

The effects of temperature, reaction time, and O2 pressure on monomer concentration, lag phase, and maximum specific growth rate (µmax) were evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the 23 full factorial design using the Protimiza Experimental Design software (). Pairwise comparisons of growth parameters were performed using unpaired Welch’s t-tests, which do not assume equal variances between groups.

3 Results

3.1 Progressive shift from oligomeric to monomeric profiles upon thermochemical depolymerization

The composition of AL, ALAP, and DAL samples were characterized using UV–vis spectroscopy, SEC, GC–MS, and HPLC (Table 2; Figure 2). According to UV–vis data, ALAP presented approximately 4-fold lower concentration of total soluble aromatics relative to AL (19,000 μg mL-1), indicating that AL was predominantly composed of lignin fragments susceptible to acid precipitation. In agreement with the UV–vis data, SEC analysis showed that acid precipitation selectively removed macromolecular lignin from AL. AL displayed a broad molecular mass distribution, whereas ALAP exhibited a well-defined low-molecular-weight peak consistent with the retention volume of the 4-coumaric acid standard (Figure 2; Supplementary Figure S1). Across the depolymerization series, SEC profiles revealed a progressive shift from oligomer-dominated to monomer-dominated profiles with increasing severity (Figure 2). According to statistical analyses, temperature was indicated as the dominant factor driving structural breakdown (Supplementary Figure S2A; Supplementary Table S1).

TABLE 2

Concentration (µg mL−1)ALAPDAL1DAL2DAL3DAL4DAL5DAL6DAL7DAL8DAL9DAL10DAL11
Total aromatics (UV-vis)5,4671,5001,2001,3001,600190018001900170020001,5002000
Phenol27193634214205179402383339434
4-Methylphenol11101114
4-Ethylphenol88724232828
4-Hydroxyacetophenone151617161617
4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde284532384642383538322228
4-Hydroxybenzoic acid99899
4-Coumaric acid60016141515
Guaiacol26163430202184161341317195236
4-Methylguaiacol626201724
4-Ethylguaiacol910925222022
Acetovanillone1514151620201822201516
Vanillin172721263134322931241618
Vanillic acid1212111111
Ferulic acid6013121212
Syringol1635392021791612111918983
4-Methylsyringol66629221416
Acetosyringone2117262454575042321618
Syringaldehyde1915172628252219151111
Catechol11111111087159244
4-Methylcatechol3334344426183471
3-Methoxycatechol128942253069
Acetic acid3,1063,0582,3312,7493,1653,2122,9933,0392,3472,85920003,183
Formic acid177390303388459570551604253396159167
Glycolic acid66158117165244377320340395488401529
Lactic acid702972403403698938559139941,3041,1561,400
Xylose6458721410115115094933349
Arabinose225375925373533411927
Glucose12201415
∑ aliphatic acids3,4193,9022,9913,6424,2375,0524,7194,8963,9895,0473,7175,278
∑ sugars97131161231261881841431345275
∑ H-type monomers637987397118281251221493463415522
∑ G-type monomers89927498101272245218445404264317
∑ S-type monomers40487989289268239300260129127
∑ catechol-type monomers33343272324178130223384
∑ aromatic monomers7292341972773118697877021,4161,2581,0311,350

Concentration of total soluble aromatics (UV–vis), monomeric aromatics (GC–MS), organic acids, and sugars (HPLC) in ALAP and DALs samples. Shades of gray represent reaction temperatures ranging from 180 °C = light gray, 240 °C = medium gray, and 300 °C = dark gray. N = 1.

Reaction conditions: DAL1 (180 °C, 30 min, 0 bar O2), DAL2 (180 °C, 30 min, 4 bar O2), DAL3 (180 °C, 90 min, 0 bar O2), DAL4 (180 °C, 90 min, 4 bar O2), DAL5–DAL7 (240 °C, 60 min, 2 bar O2), DAL8 (300 °C, 30 min, 0 bar O2), DAL9 (300 °C, 30 min, 4 bar O2), DAL10 (300 °C, 90 min, 0 bar O2), and DAL11 (300 °C, 90 min, 4 bar O2).

FIGURE 2

To determine which specific compounds underlie the molecular mass shifts observed by SEC, aromatic monomers were quantified by GC–MS (Table 2). In ALAP, 4-coumaric acid was the dominant monomer, approximately 10-fold more abundant than ferulic acid, the second most abundant species. At 180 °C (DAL1–DAL4), 4-coumaric and ferulic acid concentrations dropped by approximately 40-fold and 5-fold relative to ALAP, respectively. Low concentrations of additional aromatic compounds—including phenol, guaiacol, and syringyl-type compounds—appeared, consistent with side-chain cleavage and the formation of dealkylated aromatic compounds.

At 240 °C (DAL5–DAL7), hydroxycinnamic and hydroxybenzoic acids were no longer detected. In contrast, phenol, guaiacol, and syringol concentrations increased roughly 6- to 10-fold relative to 180 °C. New compounds also emerged, including catechol and 3-methoxycatechol. Overall, aromatic monomer concentrations approximately tripled compared to 180 °C, suggesting enhanced lignin chain cleavage.

At 300 °C (DAL8–DAL11), aromatic monomer concentrations increased by an additional ∼1.5-fold relative to 240 °C. Phenol, guaiacol, catechol, and their alkyl-substituted variants were the most enriched compounds, consistent with intensified depolymerization and defunctionalization. Notably, catechol-type monomers, absent at 180 °C, increased by up to 15-fold between 240 °C and 300 °C, highlighting the pronounced effect of temperature on demethylation reactions.

Beyond aromatic compounds, HPLC analysis revealed that depolymerization also altered the aliphatic acid and sugar composition of the liquors. ALAP contained high levels of acetic acid, consistent with hemicellulose deacetylation under mild alkaline conditions. No free sugars were detected in ALAP; however, after acid hydrolysis, residual glucan and xylan were quantified (Table 2).

Upon depolymerization, acetic acid levels remained relatively stable across all conditions, whereas other aliphatic acids increased markedly with severity. Lactic acid showed the most pronounced trend, increasing up to 20-fold at 300 °C relative to ALAP. Glycolic acid followed a similar pattern, rising up to 8-fold. Formic acid increased approximately 3-fold at 180 °C–240 °C but declined at 300 °C, suggesting its thermal degradation at higher temperatures. The formation of glycolic and lactic acids was particularly favored at 300 °C for 90 min under O2. Free sugars (xylose, arabinose, glucose) were detected in all DALs, indicating hydrolysis of residual carbohydrates during depolymerization. Overall, increasing severity resulted in both enrichment in aromatic monomers and a progressive increase in aliphatic organic acids.

3.2 Aerobic bioconversion: depolymerization of alkaline lignin improves growth of Pseudomonas putida KT2440

To assess the impact of lignin depolymerization on the aerobic bioconversion of alkaline liquor, P. putida KT2440 (herein referred to as KT2440) was cultured in minimal medium supplemented with AL, ALAP and with DALs obtained through distinct thermal treatments. AL, ALAP, and all DALs supported KT2440 growth. However, in DALs, OD600 values ranged from 0.7 to 1.2, four times higher than those observed with the liquors AL and ALAP (Figure 3; Table 3).

FIGURE 3

TABLE 3

LiquorDepolymerization conditionsµmax (h-1)Lag time (h)
AL--0.37 ± 0.036.46 ± 0.19
ALAP--0.27 ± 0.046.36 ± 0.74
DAL1180 °C, 30 min, 0 bar O20.69 ± 0.022.90 ± 0.05
DAL2180 °C, 30 min, 4 bar O20.65 ± 0.033.23 ± 0.15
DAL3180 °C, 90 min, 0 bar O20.55 ± 0.045.37 ± 0.19
DAL4180 °C, 90 min, 4 bar O20.67 ± 0.035.09 ± 0.03
DAL5240 °C, 60 min, 2 bar O20.79 ± 0.073.96 ± 0.09
DAL6240 °C, 60 min, 2 bar O20.89 ± 0.083.76 ± 0.20
DAL7240 °C, 60 min, 2 bar O20.77 ± 0.037.53 ± 0.19
DAL8300 °C, 30 min, 0 bar O20.82 ± 0.095.86 ± 0.26
DAL9300 °C, 30 min, 4 bar O20.47 ± 0.017.59 ± 0.05
DAL10300 °C, 90 min, 0 bar O20.24 ± 0.0728.29 ± 4.52
DAL11300 °C, 90 min, 4 bar O20.33 ± 0.0310.60 ± 0.73

Growth parameters of KT2440 vary according to liquor treatment conditions.

Maximum specific growth rates (µmax) and lag times are shown for cultures grown in minimal medium supplemented with AL, ALAP and DALs. Values represent the mean ± standard deviation from three biological replicates.

Among the depolymerization parameters, temperature had the most significant impact on KT2440 growth (Supplementary Figure S2B; Supplementary Table S2). Pairwise comparisons across temperature levels (DAL1 vs. DAL8, DAL2 vs. DAL9, DAL3 vs. DAL10, DAL4 vs. DAL11) showed that cultures grown with liquors depolymerized at 300 °C exhibited significantly longer lag phases than those at 180 °C (P ≤ 0.013 for all pairs, unpaired Welch’s t-test), with average values of 13 h and 4 h, respectively (Figure 3; Table 3). At 300 °C, temperature alone did not substantially reduce µmax when combined with a short reaction time and no O2 supplementation (DAL8: 0.82 ± 0.09 h-1, comparable to 240 °C conditions). However, the addition of a second severity factor significantly decreased µmax (relative to DAL8): either extended reaction time (DAL10: 0.24 ± 0.07 h-1, P = 0.001) or O2 supplementation (DAL9: 0.47 ± 0.01 h-1, P = 0.020), as well as their combination (DAL11: 0.33 ± 0.03 h-1, P = 0.006), suggesting a synergistic effect among depolymerization parameters on substrate toxicity (Table 3).

The combined effect of temperature and reaction time also influenced KT2440 growth (Supplementary Figure S2B). Comparisons between liquors representative of different reaction times (DAL1 vs. DAL3, DAL2 vs. DAL4, DAL8 vs. DAL10, and DAL9 vs. DAL11) generally showed significantly longer lag phases (P ≤ 0.019) and lower µmax values for longer reactions, consistent with increased substrate toxicity (Table 3). Regarding oxygen availability, its effect was temperature-dependent. At 180 °C, O2 supplementation did not significantly affect lag phase or µmax (P > 0.05). At 300 °C, however, O2 supplementation in DAL11 significantly reduced the lag phase by approximately 63% compared with DAL10 (P = 0.019), although µmax was not significantly improved (P = 0.143), suggesting that O2 may have mitigated the initial toxicity barrier without alleviating the overall growth limitation imposed by the substrate composition (Figure 3; Table 3).

The untreated alkaline liquor (AL and ALAP) primarily contained acetic, 4-coumaric, formic and ferulic acids, which served as carbon sources for KT2440 (Figure 4; Supplementary Table S3). In contrast, the depolymerized liquors (DALs) contained a broader range of detectable aromatic monomers and a higher concentration of non-aromatic compounds, such as glycolic and lactic acids (Supplementary Tables S4-S6). Most of these compounds were fully consumed by KT2440 (Figure 4; Supplementary Tables S4-S6), correlating with the enhanced bacterial growth observed in media containing DALs (Figure 3).

FIGURE 4

Among H-type monomers, KT2440 was incapable of effectively metabolizing phenol and its analogs containing alkyl or ketone side chains, whereas it completely converted those bearing aldehyde or propenoic acid side chains (Figure 4; Supplementary Figure S3). For G-type monomers, conversion of guaiacol and alkyl-substitutedte compounds varied according to the liquor composition and its initial concentration in the culture medium; the presence of aldehyde or propenoic acid side chains favored bioconversion. Among S-type monomers, all detected compounds were fully metabolized, except for acetosyringone, suggesting that the ketone group inhibits its bioconversion by KT2440 (Figure 4; Supplementary Figure S3).

In addition to aromatic compounds, all liquors contained aliphatic acids, predominantly acetic acid. Acetic and lactic acids were entirely consumed after 48 h of culturing (Figure 4). Formic acid was completely consumed in DAL1 to DAL4 liquors but only partially consumed in DAL8–DAL11, which were subjected to higher reaction temperatures (Figure 4; Supplementary Tables S4, S6). A similar pattern was observed for glycolic acid. Notably, the incomplete assimilation of formic and glycolic acids coincided with the liquors exhibiting the highest diversity of aromatic compounds, suggesting that the increased chemical complexity of these substrates may have negatively affected the catabolism of these aliphatic acids.

3.3 Anaerobic bioconversion: moderate lignin depolymerization enhances methane yield

Anaerobic bioconversion assays were conducted using four types of alkaline liquors: a non-depolymerized liquor (AL) and three different depolymerized liquors (DAL1, DAL5, and DAL11). DAL1 was produced under the mildest conditions (180 °C, 30 min, 0 bar O2), DAL5 under intermediate conditions (240 °C, 60 min, 2 bar O2), and DAL11 under the most severe treatment (300 °C, 90 min, 4 bar O2). For these assays, all liquors were used directly after pH adjustment to 7.0, without acid precipitation (Figure 1). It is important to note that aerobic and anaerobic bioconversion assays followed distinct standardization approaches. For aerobic assays, the liquor concentration was adjusted to 1 g L-1 of total soluble aromatics, based on UV-vis data (Section 2.5), whereas the anaerobic assays were standardized based on a substrate-to-inoculum ratio of 1:2, calculated using total volatile solids (TVS).

The total solids and total volatile solids in liquors ranged from 13.5 to 22.1 g L-1 and from 6.8 to 13 g L-1, respectively (Table 4). The AL exhibited the highest values for both total and volatile solids, while all depolymerized liquors showed progressively lower concentrations. This reduction is attributed to the loss of reactive mass during the depolymerization process, either through the release of gaseous byproducts or through hydrothermal carbonization, which decreases the residual solid content in the treated liquors (). In general, more severe reaction conditions resulted in lower solid content (Table 4, Supplementary Table S7), consistent with increased lignin fragmentation and greater monomer generation (Table 2).

TABLE 4

 Concentrations (g L-1)ALDAL1DAL5DAL11Inoculum
Total solids22.1 ± 0.121.2 ± 0.417.5 ± 0.113.5 ± 0.554 ± 3
Total volatile solids13 ± 310.0 ± 0.38.3 ± 0.86.8 ± 0.545.1 ± 2.4
Total fixed solids10 ± 311.1 ± 0.19.2 ± 0.87 ± 18.8 ± 0.4

Total, volatile, and fixed solids (g L-1) in the alkaline liquor (AL), depolymerized liquors DAL1 (180 °C, 30 min, 0 bar O2), DAL5 (240 °C, 60 min, 2 bar O2), DAL11 (300 °C, 90 min, 4 bar O2), and slaughterhouse inoculum used as the microbial source.

These data provide insight into the physicochemical characteristics of liquors and serve as a basis for evaluating their potential as substrates in anaerobic digestion processes. Values represent the mean ± standard deviation from three replicates.

Among the anaerobic bioconversion systems, the mild and moderate depolymerization conditions (DAL1 and DAL5) achieved the highest cumulative specific methane yields, showing similar average values at the endpoint (188 and 178 NmL CH4 g-1 VS, respectively). These were followed by the untreated liquor (AL, 157 NmL CH4 g-1 VS) and the most severe depolymerization condition (DAL11, 127 NmL CH4 g-1 VS), which resulted in the lowest methane yield (Figure 5). Since all assays were normalized using total volatile solids as a reference, the observed differences in terms of methane yield are consistent with compositional changes associated with each thermochemical treatment.

FIGURE 5

Kinetic modelling showed a better fit for the DAL5 and AL systems compared to DAL1 and DAL11, likely due to the faster onset of methane production (Table 5). None of the systems showed a lag phase, indicating that the organic content required for methanogenesis was readily available. The AL system exhibited the highest maximum methane production rate (Rmax), followed by DAL5, DAL1, and DAL11 (Table 5). However, in terms of methane production potential, the DAL5 system displayed the highest methane production potential (Pmax), near 20% higher than that observed for AL (Table 5). Biogas composition varied among the systems, with the highest methane proportion observed in AL (56%), followed by DAL5 (37%), whereas the other DAL systems displayed values below 30% (Table 5). Together, these results show that mild to moderate depolymerization increased cumulative methane production but also shifted the biogas composition toward higher CO2 proportions.

TABLE 5

ParameterALDAL1DAL5DAL11
CH4/CO2 biogas proportion (average)56/4425/7537/6320/80
Pmax (NmL CH4 g-1 VS)146 ± 2159 ± 7174 ± 2105 ± 5
Rmax (NmL CHg-1 VS d-1)41 ± 333 ± 635 ± 326 ± 5
Lag phase λ (d)000.1 ± 0.20
R20.940.670.990.60
RSS789.967,907.54334.543,625.67
RMSE6.6221.574.4213.48

Biogas composition and kinetic parameters in the alkaline liquor (AL) and depolymerized liquors DAL1 (180 °C, 30 min, 0 bar O2), DAL5 (240 °C, 60 min, 2 bar O2), and DAL11 (300 °C, 90 min, 4 bar O2).

Modified Gompertz model parameters for anaerobic digestion assays. Pmax: maximum methane production potential; Rmax: maximum methane production rate. Goodness-of-fit was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R2), residual sum of squares (RSS), and root mean square error (RMSE). Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation from three biological replicates.

The anaerobic microbial community fully or partially consumed most of the aromatic monomers and aliphatic acids detected in the tested liquors, except for 4-methylphenol and 4-ethylphenol (Figure 6; Supplementary Table S8). In some conditions, the concentrations of these compounds increased, suggesting their possible formation during the anaerobic process. For aliphatic acids, all liquors showed clear evidence of microbial consumption. Formic and lactic acids were fully depleted in the tested conditions whereas acetic and glycolic acid displayed consumption levels ranging from 73% to 100% on average (Figure 6; Supplementary Table S8).

FIGURE 6

Lignin oligomers were the most recalcitrant to the anaerobic digestion process, according to SEC analysis (Figure 7). Upon depolymerization reactions, a more heterogeneous profile of mass distribution was observed in the liquors, with a shift towards lower molecular weight fragments, including fragmentation products of monomers, such as phenol (elution volume ∼94 mL), which can be derived from 4-coumaric acid breakdown (elution volume ∼83 mL) (Figure 7; Supplementary Figure S1). Elution peaks attributed to 4-coumaric acid in the AL system and phenol in the DAL5 and DAL11 systems decreased consistently upon the anaerobic digestion, in agreement with our quantitative analysis (Figures 6, 7). However, intermediate-sized oligomers generated under moderate and high severity depolymerization conditions elicited a more heterogeneous response in the biological replicates. These results suggest that chemical modifications introduced into lignin fragments during depolymerization may impair their biodegradability by anaerobic microorganisms (Figure 7).

FIGURE 7

4 Discussion

The alkaline treatment of sugarcane bagasse under mild temperature conditions (<100 °C) efficiently fractionates the biomass, yielding a lignin-rich liquor (AL) and a cellulose-rich solid. However, most studies investigate the saccharification and fermentation of the cellulose-rich fraction (; )​, while the bioconvertibility of the lignin-rich liquor remains largely overlooked. This study assessed the suitability of a lignin-rich alkaline liquor, produced from sugarcane bagasse under mild temperature conditions (70 °C), for aerobic and anaerobic bioconversion. Additionally, we evaluated how thermochemical treatments applied directly to this liquor alter its chemical composition and bioconversion potential.

By varying temperature, reaction time, and oxygen pressure, we generated a series of depolymerized liquors (DAL1–DAL11) with distinct chemical profiles and degrees of lignin fragmentation. Increased hydrothermal reaction severity resulted in higher yields of monomers and short oligomers, but at the expense of degrading biocompatible monomers such as ferulic acid and 4-coumaric acid. The compositional trends observed across the depolymerization series are consistent with well-established thermochemical degradation pathways of lignin under base-catalyzed conditions. The marked decrease in hydroxycinnamic acids (4-coumaric and ferulic) at ≥180 °C is consistent with thermal degradation of the propenoic side chain, a reaction known to proceed via water-mediated decarboxylation at comparable temperatures (). The production of acetosyringone monomers throughout the depolymerization series is likely associated with the base-catalyzed cleavage of β-O-4 ether linkages in lignin oligomers (). The decline of syringol and guaiacol at the most severe conditions (DAL10 and DAL11), concomitant with the accumulation of 3-methoxycatechol and catechol, is consistent with demethylation pathways involving the hydrolysis of the O–CH3 bond while retaining the oxygen on the aromatic ring (). Overall, these concurrent pathways partially explain the chemical landscape encountered by microorganisms in subsequent bioconversion assays. A deeper understanding of the interplay between inter-unit bond cleavage and intra-monomer defunctionalization will be essential to predict and control the biological compatibility of lignin-derived streams.

Although the aerobic and anaerobic assays were performed with and without prior acid precipitation of macromolecular lignin, respectively—precluding direct comparison of overall bioconversion performance between routes—they nonetheless enabled qualitative comparison of monomer-specific recalcitrance. For instance, 4-ethylphenol and 4-methylphenol were resistant to bioconversion in both systems. Phenol is known to inhibit anaerobic digestion at concentrations near 1,400 μg mL-1 (), likely through disruption of microbial membranes (). However, in most of our anaerobic assays, phenol (<271 μg mL-1) was either partially or fully consumed, suggesting that the anaerobic consortium was able to utilize it as a substrate for methanogenesis, consistent with previous reports (; ; ). This contrasts with the aerobic assays, where phenol was recalcitrant to P. putida KT2440 (Figures 4, 6).

The formation of small amounts of 4-methylphenol and 4-ethylphenol was detected in some anaerobic assays, which may reflect the transformation of complex aromatics into simpler phenolic structures by the microbial community ()​. Similar mechanisms have been reported for other compounds, such as the conversion of methylfurans into furfural by methanogenic archaea like Methanococcus (). Interestingly, acetosyringone, which is not metabolized by P. putida KT2440, was efficiently consumed in anaerobic assays, suggesting that the microbial community used in this study could be a promising source of enzymes to enable acetosyringone metabolism in engineered cell factories. However, beyond identifying these enzymes, further studies will be required to assess the compatibility of this metabolic route for applications in aerobic bacteria such as P. putida.

For P. putida growth, the best results were observed under mild to moderate depolymerization conditions, which correlate with the lower content of toxic monomers such as phenol and its alkyl-substituted variants, and catechol. Growth inhibition of P. putida strains was reported to phenol and catechol individually added at concentrations of 600 μg mL-1and 770 μg mL-1, respectively (; ). At the severe depolymerization conditions, although phenol and catechol concentrations are below this levels (<300 μg mL-1), the observed inhibition of bacterial growth in our experiments is most likely due to the combined toxic effects of the compound mixture, as previously reported (; ). To improve its tolerance and efficiency in metabolizing lignin-derived compounds generated in the reactions at 300 °C, particularly in relation to DAL10 and DAL11, metabolic engineering strategies will be essential to overcome the bottleneck of guaiacol and phenol metabolism in the KT2440 platform. In this context, heterologous expression of guaiacol O-demethylase and phenol hydroxylase represents promising approaches, as demonstrated in previous studies (; ; ).

In the anaerobic digestion assays, the moderate depolymerization condition (DAL5) yielded the highest methane production, with approximately 20% increase compared to the untreated alkaline liquor. This result suggests that moderate depolymerization provides the most favorable balance between substrate accessibility and biological compatibility. However, the proportion of CO2 in the biogas increased across all DAL samples relative to AL (Table 5), suggesting impairment of methanogenic pathways. For this phenomenon, we hypothesize a dual inhibition mechanism: recalcitrant monomers, particularly phenol and its alkyl-substituted variants, may have selectively impaired acetoclastic methanogenesis (; ), prompting a compensatory shift toward syntrophic acetate oxidation (SAO) coupled with hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis (; ). However, in this two-step route, the CO2 produced as an intermediate by SAO may not be efficiently converted to CH4 during hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis, leading to its direct accumulation in the biogas. Furthermore, incomplete H2 consumption by inhibited hydrogenotrophic archaea may raise the H2 partial pressure, rendering SAO thermodynamically unfavorable () and resulting in residual acetate accumulation, consistent with the acetate detected at the end of the DAL1 and DAL11 assays (Supplementary Table S8). This dual bottleneck model—inhibition of both acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis—provides a coherent framework to explain the shift in biogas composition, and the progressive decrease in maximum methane production rates (Rmax) with increasing depolymerization severity. Elucidating the precise contribution of each mechanism will require future studies combining microbial community profiling with pathway-specific activity assays.

5 Conclusion and perspectives

In this study, we show that thermochemical depolymerization severity strongly shapes the chemical profile of a lignin-rich alkaline liquor and, consequently, its performance in aerobic and anaerobic bioconversion. Increasing severity promotes a shift from oligomeric to monomer-rich lignin fractions; however, enhanced chemical depolymerization does not linearly improve biological conversion. Instead, mild to moderate depolymerization conditions provided the most favorable balance between lignin fragmentation and biological compatibility, improving both P. putida KT2440 growth and methane production, whereas severe conditions generated streams containing higher amounts of recalcitrant monomers—particularly phenol and its alkyl-substituted variants—associated with microbial growth inhibition and reduced methanogenesis. Together, our results indicate that lignin depolymerization alone is insufficient to maximize bioconversion efficiency and highlight toxicity and compound-specific recalcitrance as key limiting factors. Future research should focus on integrating controlled depolymerization with metabolic engineering strategies to expand microbial bioconversion capacity, as well as on microbial community analyses, process optimization, techno-economic evaluation, and life cycle assessment to support the scalable and sustainable integration of these lignin valorization routes within biorefinery schemes.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

FM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. FK: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. JS: Data curation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. GG: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. RP: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review and editing. MM: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review and editing. AL: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review and editing. FS: Investigation, Writing – review and editing. RR: Data curation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. CD: Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. GMR: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. PdG: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP; Grants No. 2023/11786-7, 2023/09789-8, 2021/13455-2, and 2024/01112-1), the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq; Grants No. 303747/2022-6, 310412/2022-6, and 405692/2022-6), and the Minas Gerais Research Foundation (FAPEMIG; Grants No. APQ-05218-23 and APQ-00544-23).

Acknowledgments

We thank the CMC-GP and HT-BioSys facilities under proposal numbers 20242288 and 20253669, respectively, at the Brazilian Biorenewables National Laboratory (LNBR), part of the Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM). We would also like to acknowledge Daniele Cristina Joaquim Santoro for her assistance in the operation of the reactors during the production of alkaline liquors and depolymerization processes. We further thank Fernando Roberto Paz Cedeno for his contributions to the study that led to the definition of the reaction conditions for the production of alkaline liquors and Ederson Paulo Xavier Guilherme for support on statistical analyses.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. Generative artificial intelligence tools were used solely for language editing and text correction to improve clarity and readability, as well as to generate illustrative icons used in the graphical abstract and Figure 1 schemes. All content was carefully reviewed by the authors to ensure accuracy and scientific integrity.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2026.1837262/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1

    AkutsuM.AbeN.SakamotoC.KurimotoY.SugitaH.TanakaM.et al (2022). Pseudomonas sp. NGC7 as a microbial chassis for glucose-free muconate production from a variety of lignin-derived aromatics and its application to the production from sugar cane bagasse alkaline extract. Bioresour. Technol.359, 127479. 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127479

  • 2

    APHA (2023). “American public health association,” in Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. ed. LippsW. C.BaxterT. E.24th Edn.

  • 3

    AshokkumarV.VenkatkarthickR.JayashreeS.ChuetorS.DharmarajS.KumarG.et al (2022). Recent advances in lignocellulosic biomass for biofuels and value-added bioproducts - a critical review. Bioresour. Technol.344, 126195. 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126195

  • 4

    BalasundaramG.BanuR.VarjaniS.KazmiA. A.TyagiV. K. (2022). Recalcitrant compounds formation, their toxicity, and mitigation: key issues in biomass pretreatment and anaerobic digestion. Chemosphere291, 132930. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132930

  • 5

    BarakatA.MonlauF.SteyerJ.-P.CarrereH. (2012). Effect of lignin-derived and furan compounds found in lignocellulosic hydrolysates on biomethane production. Bioresour. Technol.104, 9099. 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.10.060

  • 6

    BleemA.KuatsjahE.PresleyG. N.HinchenD. J.ZahnM.GarciaD. C.et al (2022). Discovery, characterization, and metabolic engineering of rieske non-heme iron monooxygenases for guaiacol O-demethylation. Chem. Catal.2, 19892011. 10.1016/j.checat.2022.04.019

  • 7

    CarocaE.SerranoA.BorjaR.JiménezA.CarvajalA.BragaA. F. M.et al (2021). Influence of phenols and furans released during thermal pretreatment of olive mill solid waste on its anaerobic digestion. Waste Manag.120, 202208. 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.11.027

  • 8

    CedenoF. R. P.GomesG. R.SilvaJ. J.MenezesF. F.NascimentoV. M.RochaG. J. M.et al (2026). Deacetylation and mechanical refining pathway for the bioconversion of sugarcane bagasse. Bioenerg. Res.19, 73. 10.1007/s12155-026-10994-5

  • 9

    ChapleurO.MadigouC.CivadeR.RodolpheY.MazéasL.BouchezT. (2016). Increasing concentrations of phenol progressively affect anaerobic digestion of cellulose and associated microbial communities. Biodegradation27, 1527. 10.1007/s10532-015-9751-4

  • 10

    ChaudharyG.ChaudharyN.SainiS.GuptaY.VivekanandV.PanghalA. (2024). Assessment of pretreatment strategies for valorization of lignocellulosic biomass: path forwarding towards lignocellulosic biorefinery. Waste Biomass Valorization15, 136. 10.1007/s12649-023-02219-z

  • 11

    ChenX.MosierN.LadischM. (2024). Valorization of lignin from aqueous-based lignocellulosic biorefineries. Trends Biotechnol.42, 13481362. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2024.07.004

  • 12

    DavisR.GrundlN.TaoL.BiddyM. J.TanE. C. D.BeckhamG. T.et al (2018). Process Design and Economics for the Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Hydrocarbon Fuels and Coproducts: 2018 Biochemical Design Case Update. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

  • 13

    de LorenzoV.Pérez-PantojaD.NikelP. I. (2024). Pseudomonas putida KT2440: the long journey of a soil-dweller to become a synthetic biology chassis. J. Bacteriol.206, e00136-24. 10.1128/jb.00136-24

  • 14

    FreitasJ. V.BilattoS.SquincaP.PintoA. S. S.BrondiM. G.BondanciaT. J.et al (2021). Sugarcane biorefineries: potential opportunities towards shifting from wastes to products. Ind. Crops Prod.172, 114057. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114057

  • 15

    FreixoR.CasanovaF.RibeiroA. B.PereiraC. F.CostaE. M.PintadoM. E.et al (2023). Extraction methods and characterization of cellulose fractions from a sugarcane by-product for potential industry applications. Ind. Crops Prod.197, 116615. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116615

  • 16

    GhoshS.RoyS.MoulikS. (2025). Alkaline pretreatment wastewater from lignocellulosic biomass: challenges and emerging management strategies. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.32, 3031630374. 10.1007/s11356-025-36775-9

  • 17

    HattoriS. (2008). Syntrophic acetate-oxidizing microbes in methanogenic environments. Microbes Environ.23, 118127. 10.1264/jsme2.23.118

  • 18

    HubbeM.AlénR.PaleologouM.KannangaraM.KihlmanJ. (2019). Lignin recovery from spent alkaline pulping liquors using acidification, membrane separation, and related processing steps: a review. BioResources14, 23002351. 10.15376/biores.14.1.2300-2351

  • 19

    KariimI.BakariR.Wasi SyedM.ParkJ.-Y.LeeI.-G.KiveveleT. (2025). Biomass depolymerization into liquid biofuel: a review of process conditions and an insight into the technoeconomic evaluation. ACS Symp. Ser.1501, 105135. 10.1021/bk-2025-1501.ch006

  • 20

    KoJ. K.UmY.ParkY.-C.SeoJ.-H.KimK. H. (2015). Compounds inhibiting the bioconversion of hydrothermally pretreated lignocellulose. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.99, 42014212. 10.1007/s00253-015-6595-0

  • 21

    KohlstedtM.StarckS.BartonN.StolzenbergerJ.SelzerM.MehlmannK.et al (2018). From lignin to nylon: cascaded chemical and biochemical conversion using metabolically engineered Pseudomonas putida. Metab. Eng.47, 279293. 10.1016/j.ymben.2018.03.003

  • 22

    KuhnE. M.ChenX.TuckerM. P. (2020). Deacetylation and mechanical refining (DMR) and deacetylation and dilute acid (DDA) pretreatment of corn stover, switchgrass, and a 50:50 corn stover/switchgrass blend. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.8, 67346743. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00894

  • 23

    LappalainenJ.BaudouinD.HornungU.SchulerJ.MelinK.BjelićS.et al (2020). Sub- and supercritical water liquefaction of kraft lignin and Black liquor derived lignin. Energies13, 3309. 10.3390/en13133309

  • 24

    LeeS.KangM.JungC. D.BaeJ. H.LeeJ. Y.ParkY. K.et al (2023). Development of novel recombinant peroxidase secretion system from Pseudomonas putida for lignin valorisation. Bioresour. Technol.388, 129779. 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129779

  • 25

    LiQ.YangB.LiangC.WuK.ZhaoX.WangC.et al (2025). Effect of lignin structure composition on anaerobic digestion based on lignin monomer model compounds. Biomass Convers. biorefin.15, 2085320865. 10.1007/s13399-025-06730-2

  • 26

    LingerJ. G.VardonD. R.GuarnieriM. T.KarpE. M.HunsingerG. B.FrandenM. A.et al (2014). Lignin valorization through integrated biological funneling and chemical catalysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.111, 1201312018. 10.1073/pnas.1410657111

  • 27

    LongJ.XuY.WangT.ShuR.ZhangQ.ZhangX.et al (2014). Hydrothermal depolymerization of lignin: understanding the structural evolution. BioResources9, 71627175. 10.15376/biores.9.4.7162-7175

  • 28

    MartimD. B.BrilhanteA. J. V. C.LimaA. R.PaixãoD. A. A.Martins-JuniorJ.KashiwagiF. M.et al (2024). Resolving the metabolism of monolignols and other lignin-related aromatic compounds in Xanthomonas citri. Nat. Commun.15, 7994. 10.1038/s41467-024-52367-6

  • 29

    MenezesF. F.MartimD. B.LingL. Y.MulatoA. T. N.CrespimE.OliveiraJ. V. C.et al (2022). Exploring the compatibility between hydrothermal depolymerization of alkaline lignin from sugarcane bagasse and metabolization of the aromatics by bacteria. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.223, 223230. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.10.269

  • 30

    MenezesF. F.NascimentoV. M.GomesG. R.RochaG. J. M.StraussM.JunqueiraT. L.et al (2023). Depolymerization of enzymatic hydrolysis lignin: review of technologies and opportunities for research. Fuel342, 127796. 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127796

  • 31

    MensahM.TiaR.AdeiE.de LeeuwN. H. (2022). A DFT mechanistic study on base-catalyzed cleavage of the β-O-4 ether linkage in lignin: implications for selective lignin depolymerization. Front. Chem.10, 793759. 10.3389/fchem.2022.793759

  • 32

    MonlauF.SambusitiC.BarakatA.QuéméneurM.TrablyE.SteyerJ.-P.et al (2014). Do furanic and phenolic compounds of lignocellulosic and algae biomass hydrolyzate inhibit anaerobic mixed cultures? A comprehensive review. Biotechnol. Adv.32, 934951. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.04.007

  • 33

    MulatD. G.HornS. J. (2018). “Biogas production from lignin via anaerobic digestion,” in Energy from Organic Materials (Biomass), 391412. 10.1039/9781788010351-00391

  • 34

    Muñoz SierraJ. D.García ReaV. S.Cerqueda-GarcíaD.SpanjersH.van LierJ. B. (2020). Anaerobic conversion of saline phenol-containing wastewater under thermophilic conditions in a membrane bioreactor. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.8, 565311. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.565311

  • 35

    NelsonK. E.WeinelC.PaulsenI. T.DodsonR. J.HilbertH.Martins dos SantosV. A.et al (2002). Complete genome sequence and comparative analysis of the metabolically versatile Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Environ. Microbiol.4, 799808. 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00366.x

  • 36

    Olguin-LoraP.Puig-GrajalesL.Razo-FloresE. (2003). Inhibition of the acetoclastic methanogenic activity by phenol and alkyl phenols. Environ. Technol.24, 9991006. 10.1080/09593330309385638

  • 37

    PienkosP. T.ZhangM. (2009). Role of pretreatment and conditioning processes on toxicity of lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysates. Cellulose16, 743762. 10.1007/s10570-009-9309-x

  • 38

    PremE. M.MutschlechnerM.StresB.IllmerP.WagnerA. O. (2021). Lignin intermediates lead to phenyl acid formation and microbial community shifts in meso- and thermophilic batch reactors. Biotechnol. Biofuels14, 27. 10.1186/s13068-020-01855-0

  • 39

    QiQ.HuJ.QuL.JiangX.GaiY.ValenzuelaS. A.et al (2019). Rapid, simplified microscale quantitative analysis of lignin H/G/S composition with GC-MS in glass ampules and glass capillaries. MethodsX6, 25922600. 10.1016/j.mex.2019.11.005

  • 40

    RadhikaN. L.SachdevaS.KumarM. (2021). Microbe assisted depolymerization of lignin rich waste and its conversion to gaseous biofuel. J. Environ. Manage.300, 113684. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113684

  • 41

    RochaG. J. D. M.NascimentoV. M.GonçalvesA. R.SilvaV. F. N.MartínC. (2015). Influence of mixed sugarcane bagasse samples evaluated by elemental and physical-chemical composition. Ind. Crops Prod.64, 5258. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.11.003

  • 42

    RodriguesM. I.IemmaA. F. (2014). Experimental Design and Process Optimization. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

  • 43

    SampaioM. A.GonçalvesM. R.MarquesI. P. (2011). Anaerobic digestion challenge of raw olive mill wastewater. Bioresour. Technol.102, 1081010818. 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.001

  • 44

    SantosP. M.BenndorfD.Sá-CorreiaI. (2004). Insights into Pseudomonas putida KT2440 response to phenol-induced stress by quantitative proteomics. Proteomics4, 26402652. 10.1002/pmic.200300793

  • 45

    SchutyserW.RendersT.Van Den BoschS.KoelewijnS. F.BeckhamG. T.SelsB. F. (2018). Chemicals from lignin: an interplay of lignocellulose fractionation, depolymerisation, and upgrading. Chem. Soc. Rev.47, 852908. 10.1039/c7cs00566k

  • 46

    SilvaW. R.SantosT. M.CarregosaJ. C.SchmittC. C.RaffeltK.DahmenN.et al (2025). Bio-oil as a source of renewable chemicals: the chemistry of pyrolytic lignin. Biomass Convers. biorefin.15, 54015418. 10.1007/s13399-024-05622-1

  • 47

    SluiterA.HamesB.RuizR.ScarlataC.SluiterJ.TempletonD. (2008). “Determination of sugars, byproducts, and degradation products in liquid fraction process samples,” in Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP). Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

  • 48

    SluiterJ. B.ChumH.GomesA. C.TavaresR. P. A.AzevedoV.PimentaM. T. B.et al (2016). Evaluation of Brazilian sugarcane bagasse characterization: an interlaboratory comparison study. J. AOAC Int.99, 579585. 10.5740/jaoacint.15-0063

  • 49

    SriBalaG.Van de VijverR.LiL.DoguO.MarinG. B.Van GeemK. M. (2021). On the primary thermal decomposition pathways of hydroxycinnamic acids. Proc. Combust. Inst.38, 42074214. 10.1016/j.proci.2020.06.086

  • 50

    SunZ.LiuQ.LiY.MazarjiM.FengL.PanJ. (2024). Deciphering the impact of lignin on anaerobic digestion: focus on inhibition mechanisms and methods for alleviating inhibition. ACS Omega9, 4403344041. 10.1021/acsomega.4c04375

  • 51

    SuzukiY.OtsukaY.ArakiT.KamimuraN.MasaiE.NakamuraM.et al (2021). Lignin valorization through efficient microbial production of β-ketoadipate from industrial Black liquor. Bioresour. Technol.337, 125489. 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125489

  • 52

    Trujillo-ReyesÁ.Cubero-CardosoJ.Rodríguez-GutiérrezG.García-MartínJ. F.Rodríguez-GalánM.BorjaR.et al (2019). Extraction of phenolic compounds and production of biomethane from strawberry and raspberry extrudates. Biochem. Eng. J.147, 1119. 10.1016/j.bej.2019.03.023

  • 53

    Tumen-VelasquezM.JohnsonC. W.AhmedA.DominickG.FulkE. M.KhannaP.et al (2018). Accelerating pathway evolution by increasing the gene dosage of chromosomal segments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.115, 71057110. 10.1073/pnas.1803745115

  • 54

    Verein Deutsche r Ingenieure (2006). “Fermentation of organic materials, characterisation of the substrate, sampling, collection of material data, fermentation tests,” in VDI Handbuch Energietechnik (Berlin: Beuth Verlag GmbH), 4459.

  • 55

    VolpiM. P. C.BrenelliL. B.MockaitisG.RabeloS. C.FrancoT. T.MoraesB. S. (2022). Use of lignocellulosic residue from second-generation ethanol production to enhance methane production through co-digestion. BioEnergy Res.15, 602616. 10.1007/s12155-021-10293-1

  • 56

    VolpiM. P. C.FuessL. T.MoraesB. S. (2023). Economic performance of biogas production and use from residues co-digestion in integrated 1G2G sugarcane biorefineries: better electricity or biomethane?Energy Convers. Manag.277, 116673. 10.1016/j.enconman.2023.116673

  • 57

    WeilandF.KohlstedtM.WittmannC. (2022). Guiding stars to the field of dreams: metabolically engineered pathways and microbial platforms for a sustainable lignin-based industry. Metab. Eng.71, 1341. 10.1016/j.ymben.2021.11.011

  • 58

    WernerA. Z.ClareR.MandT. D.PardoI.RamirezK. J.HauberS. J.et al (2023). Lignin conversion to β-ketoadipic acid by Pseudomonas putida via metabolic engineering and bioprocess development. Sci. Adv.9, eadj0053. 10.1126/sciadv.adj0053

  • 59

    WuY.-R.HeJ. (2013). Characterization of anaerobic consortia coupled lignin depolymerization with biomethane generation. Bioresour. Technol.139, 512. 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.103

  • 60

    Yaverino-GutierrezM. A.AscencioJ. J.ChandelA. K. (2025). Optimization of alkaline pretreatment and structural insights for converting eucalyptus sawdust and sugarcane bagasse into cellulosic sugars. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.197, 58215837. 10.1007/s12010-025-05316-y

  • 61

    YinX.WeiL.PanX.LiuC.JiangJ.WangK. (2021). The pretreatment of lignocelluloses with green solvent as biorefinery preprocess: a minor review. Front. Plant Sci.12, 670061. 10.3389/fpls.2021.670061

  • 62

    YooC. G.MengX.PuY.RagauskasA. J. (2020). The critical role of lignin in lignocellulosic biomass conversion and recent pretreatment strategies: a comprehensive review. Bioresour. Technol.301, 122784. 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122784

  • 63

    ZhuH.DuB.BaiY.PanZ.SunY.WangX.et al (2023). Base-catalyzed depolymerization of lignin into phenols: methoxy groups' secondary reactions triggered phenol regulation and repolymerization. Biomass Convers. biorefin.13, 1300913021. 10.1007/s13399-021-02190-6

  • 64

    ZhuH.-W.WangC.JiaH.-Y.LiuZ.-H.LiB.-Z. (2025). Engineered pseudomonas Putida: a versatile chassis for lignin valorization. Green Chem.27, 1031610345. 10.1039/D5GC02312B

  • 65

    ZongQ.-J.XuT.LiuH.XuL.ZhangR.-K.LiB.-Z.et al (2022). Microbial valorization of lignin to bioplastic by genome-reduced Pseudomonas putida. Front. Microbiol.13, 923664. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.923664

Summary

Keywords

aerobic bioconversion, alkaline liquor, anaerobic digestion, aromatic, biogas, biomethane, lignin depolymerization

Citation

Farias de Menezes F, Kashiwagi FM, Silva JJ, Gomes GR, Prata R, Rosa de Moraes M, Lima AF, Garcia da Silva F, Rodriguez RP, Driemeier CE, Jackson de Moraes Rocha G and de Giuseppe PO (2026) Impact of lignin depolymerization on aerobic and anaerobic bioconversion of alkaline liquor from sugarcane bagasse. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 14:1837262. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2026.1837262

Received

23 March 2026

Revised

16 May 2026

Accepted

10 June 2026

Published

14 July 2026

Volume

14 - 2026

Edited by

Thomas Bartholomäus Brück, Technical University of Munich, Germany

Reviewed by

Ezhaveni Sathiyamoorthi, Yeungnam University, Republic of Korea

Kgodiso Judith Mabaso, Vaal University of Technology, South Africa

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: George Jackson de Moraes Rocha, ; Priscila Oliveira de Giuseppe,

† These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

‡ These authors share last authorship

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics