AUTHOR=Hu Yueliang , Zhao Jiehui , Wang Qian , Chao Huijuan , Tang Biwen , Cheng Di , Tan Isabella , Butlin Mark , Avolio Alberto , Wang Weiliang , Zuo Junli 

TITLE=Disparate Associations of 24-h Central Aortic and Brachial Cuff Blood Pressure With Hypertension-Mediated Organ Damage and Cardiovascular Risk

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

VOLUME=Volume 9 - 2022

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cardiovascular-medicine/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.795509

DOI=10.3389/fcvm.2022.795509

ISSN=2297-055X

ABSTRACT=Objective: Aim of this study was to evaluate the associations  of non-invasive central aortic and peripheral (brachial) blood pressure (BP) for Hypertension-mediated  organ damage (HMOD) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk.
Methods: We evaluated associations of HMOD with 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) of central aortic and peripheral BP indices in patients with primary hypertension and presence of several cardiovascular risk factors.  BP measurements were performed by means of a noninvasive automated oscillometric device (Mobil-O-Graph). HMOD was defined as the presence of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) above normal values and/or carotid plaque, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), and/or renal abnormalities as assessed by urine albumin/creatinine ratio above normal values and/or estimated glomerular filtration rate（eGFR）less than 60 ml/min per 1.73m2.
Results: In the study cohort of 273 (age 55.2±13.4 years, 71.8% male) patients with primary hypertension, documented HMOD was present in 180 (65.9%), LVH in 70 (25.6%), increased IMT in 129 (47.3%). 56 patients (20.5%) had kidney organ damage (20.5% albuminuria and 2.6% impaired eGFR). When accounting for confounding factors (age, sex, body-mass-index, antihypertensive treatment, smoking, triacylglycerol, statin treatment, glucose, hypoglycemic therapy, or heart rate) only peripheral 24-hour pulse pressure (PP) maintained statistical significance with HMOD indices (OR: 1.126, 95% CI: 1.012~1.253; p = 0.029). Using ASCVD risk score as the independent continuous variable in multiple linear regression, 24-hour central systolic pressure (SBP) (β = 0.179; 95% CI：0.019~0.387; p=0.031), daytime central PP (β= 0.114; 95% CI:0.070~0.375; p =0.005, night-time central SBP (β= 0.411; 95% CI:0.112~0.691; p =0.007) and night-time PP (β= 0.257; 95% CI:0.165~0.780; p =0.003) were all positively associated with ASCVD risk. 
Conclusions: Blood pressure obtained by 24-hour ABPM was better correlated with HMOD than office BP. Whilst 24-hour peripheral BP showed a stronger association with HMOD than 24-hour central BP, the prognostic  value of 24-hour central BP for the 10-year ASCVD risk was superior to 24-hour peripheral BP.