Abstract
Background:
In recent years, the incidence rates of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and heart disease (HD) have noticeably increased worldwide. Previous studies have found that patients with RA are more likely to develop HD, while the cause and effect have still remained elusive. In this study, Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was used to indicate whether there was a potential association between RA and HD.
Methods:
Data of RA, ischemic heart disease (IHD), myocardial infarction (MI), atrial fibrillation (AF), and arrhythmia were based on the genome-wide association study (GWAS) dataset. No disease group was intersected. Inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was used to calculate MR estimates, and sensitivity analysis was performed.
Results:
The primary MR analysis showed that genetic susceptibility to RA was significantly associated with the risk of IHD and MI, rather than with AF and arrhythmia. Besides, there was no heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy between the primary and replicated analyses. There was a significant correlation between RA and the risk of IHD (odds ratio (OR), 1.0006; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.000244–1.00104; P = 0.001552), meanwhile, there was a significant correlation between RA and the risk of MI (OR, 1.0458; 95% CI, 1.07061–1.05379; P = 0.001636). The results were similar to those of sensitivity analysis, and the sensitivity analysis also verified the conclusion. Furthermore, sensitivity and reverse MR analyses suggested that no heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy or reverse causality was found between RA and cardiovascular comorbidity.
Conclusion:
RA was noted to be causally associated with IHD and MI, rather than with AF and arrhythmia. This MR study might provide a new genetic basis for the causal relationship between RA and the risk of CVD. The findings suggested that the control of RA activity might reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease.
Introduction
Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is the leading cause of death globally. In 2019, there were 197.2 million IHD cases and 9.1 million IHD-related deaths worldwide (1, 2). However, the prevalence and mortality rates of IHD have decreased over the past decades (1, 3). IHD treatment has shown to play a vital role in reducing the mortality rate of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and also contributed to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (4). Smoking is the main cause of IHD morbidity, and metabolic risk factors may noticeably affect IHD morbidity, including hypertension, increased fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level, increased low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) level, obesity, lack of exercise, and poor eating habits (1, 5). Consequently, metabolic risk factors will increase the prevalence rate of IHD in the future. IHD-associated risk factors may also cause rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and rheumatoid factors have been proved to be independent risk factors for IHD (6, 7). In a previous study, RA patients were compared to a normal population, and it was found that 48% of RA patients were more likely to develop CVD and 50% were likely to die from it (8–10). Not only RA and IHD have exhibited similar causes, but also IHD was reported as the leading cause of cardiovascular complications in RA patients (11). The use of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs might be associated with the reduced risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients with RA. However, different drugs had different effects on the cardiovascular risk (12). The exact causal relationship between RA and CVD has still remained elusive.
Mendelian randomization (MR) can estimate the causal relationship without bias, and it has been used to explore the risk factors for CVD, such as arachidonic acid (13), linoleic acid (14), glucagon (15), body mass index (16), etc. Moreover, MR analysis has revealed the causality between atrial fibrillation (AF) (17) and thyroid function (18) with IHD. In previous studies, the relationship between RA and IHD has been tentatively explored. A study showed that RA patients were at the higher risk of heart failure (HF) and IHD than the general population and a population with osteoarthritis (19, 20). Due to the improvement of RA management, a decrease in cardiovascular mortality rates was recorded after 2004 (21).
However, RA patients could be associated with an increased risk of HF and it was irrelevant to the risk of IHD. This could be resulted from the rapidly increased risk of non-ischemic HF after RA onset (22). In the present study, the causal relationship between RA and IHD was analyzed using inverse-variance weighted (IVW) and MR-Egger methods.
Methods
Data sources and study design
A two-sample MR study was performed using a classical MR analysis scheme. Genome-wide association study (GWAS)-based data included summary-level data for RA that covered 14,361 cases and 43,923 controls, as well as single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for AF as the outcome dataset that included 970,216 controls and 60,620 cases.
GWAS-based data for myocardial infarction (MI) as an outcome dataset were obtained from FinnGen (https://www.finngen.fi/en), which included 187,840 controls and 12,801 cases. Additional data were derived from a GWAS containing summary-level data for arrhythmia that covered 2,545 cases and 460,388 controls and summary-level data for IHD that included 5,861 cases and 457,149 controls. Demographic characteristics of cases are shown in Table 1.
Table 1
| Traits | Sample size (cases/controls) | Data sources | Ancestry | R 2(%) for RA/AD (Total) | F for RA/AD (Total) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure to RA | 14,361/43,923 | PMID: 33310728 | European | ||
| Outcomes | |||||
| Arrhythmia | 2,545/460,388 | ukb-b-3703 | European | 0.0466 | 49 |
| AF | 60,620/970,216 | PMID: 30061737 | European | 0.0611 | 44 |
| MI | 12,801/187,840 | finn-b-I9_MI | European | 0.0588 | 44 |
| IHD | 5,861/457,149 | ukb-b-8184 | European | 0.0484 | 48 |
Assessment of instrumental variables and data sources.
SD = SE × N1/2, where SE, the standard error of the estimated effect, N, the sample size of the GWAS. R2 = 2 × (1-EAF) × EAF × (b/SD)2, where b, the estimated effect on adipokines, EAF, the effect allele frequency. F = R2(N-K-1)/[K(1-R2)].
A two-sample MR analysis was carried out to assess the causal relationship between the risk of CVD and genetic susceptibility to RA, and SNPs were used as instrumental variables (IVs) (23). The three principal hypotheses of a classical MR study were met for the overall process: exposure was directly influenced by IVs; IVs and confounders were not associated; through exposure, the risk of outcomes was directly influenced by IVs. Informed consent and ethical approval were available in the original studies. The present study was conducted in accordance with the latest STROBE-MR guidelines (24).
Ethical approval
The MR study was conducted using GWAS summary statistics. All GWAS-based data are accessible to the public and freely downloadable on the GWAS Catalog (https://www.ebi.ac.uk). Ethical approval was obtained for each dataset.
Ivs
All genetic variants that were related to RA (P < 5 × 10−8) were considered as IVs. SNPs in a linkage disequilibrium (LD) state were identified through testing of the corresponding LD. These independent SNPs were selected by removing those within a 10,000 kb window and a threshold r2 < 0.001. In order to exclude the potential pleiotropy effect, the secondary phenotype of each SNP was searched in the PhenoScanner V2 database, indicating whether SNPs would be potentially associated with confounders or risk factors for outcomes. SNPs that did not correspond to phenotypes related to outcomes were further analyzed, while the remaining SNPs were excluded. The variance R2 was calculated for the screened SNPs, and the strength of IVs was evaluated using F-statistics. This avoided weak-tool bias (23). Additionally, a meticulous calculation method (F = R2(N-K-1)/[K(1-R2)] was adopted, where R2 indicates cumulative explained variance of the selected SNPs during exposure, N refers to the number of samples for the selected GWAS, and K refers to the number of SNPs for the final analysis. If F > 10, the correlation between IVs and exposure was considered strongly enough, and the results of the MR analysis were not affected by the weak tool bias.
To ensure consistency of alleles of all SNPs between MI and RA, the SNP-RA and SNP-MI statistics were unified. Different outcomes, such as arrhythmia, AF, and IHD were adjusted. In the MR analysis, the primary analytical method used in accordance with heterogeneity was the IVW method as described previously (23). Simultaneously, to explore and deduce causality comprehensively, maximum-likelihood, MR-pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO), MR-Egger, median weighting, and MR-robust adjusted profile score (MR-RAPS) were also utilized (25). Each method made different assumptions related to the efficacy of IVs. When half of IVs were invalid, median weighting was estimated. MR-RAPS corrected horizontal multiplicity and reduced its deviation using robust adjusted contour scores. MR-Egger method had a low statistical ability, while it provided an estimation after correcting multiple effects. Outliers in IVW linear regression were automatically detected and removed by the MR-PRESO method for corrected MR estimation (25).
Analysis of pleiotropy and heterogeneity
In order to perform sensitivity analysis, various methods were employed. Heterogeneity among individual SNP estimates was evaluated by the Cochran's Q test. It was proved as an appropriate method for analysis. If P > 0.05, the fixed-effects IVW method was considered as no heterogeneity was indicated; otherwise, the random-effects model was applied. In order to determine the horizontal pleiotropy of IVs, the MR-Egger method was also utilized (18). The average horizontal pleiotropic effect among SNPs was estimated by the MR-Egger method. The estimated IVW was considered to be accompanied by bias if P-value was less than 0.05. The probability of a SNP was also estimated by leave-one-out sensitivity test. Finally, the existence of pleiotropy was directly detected by drawing funnel and forest plots. A two-sided P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The statistical analysis was carried out using R 4.1.2 software, which included the “MR-PRESSO”, “Two-Sample MR”, and “MR.RAPS” packages.
Results
Causal relationship between the risk of AF or arrhythmia and genetic susceptibility to RA
As shown in Table 2, the prevalence of arrhythmia (odds ratio (OR) = 0.100, 95% confidence interval (CI): [0.100–1.000], P = 0.873) in the RA group was not significantly different from that in the control group (Supplementary Figure S1). The results were consistent with those obtained by the IVW method. Meanwhile, no significant association was found between the risk of RA and AF [OR = 1.003, 95% CI: (0.985–1.021), P = 0.755] (Supplementary Figure S2, Table 2).
Table 2
| Disease | Methods | SNPs (n) | OR | 95% CI | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arrhythmia | MR-Egger | 58 | 1.0001 | 0.999554–1.000586 | 0.790956 |
| Weighted median | 58 | 1.0003 | 0.999852–1.000668 | 0.211671 | |
| IVW | 58 | 0.9999 | 0.999650–1.000297 | 0.873395 | |
| Simple mode | 58 | 1.0002 | 0.999100–1.001278 | 0.735234 | |
| Weighted mode | 58 | 1.0001 | 0.999729–1.000475 | 0.593739 | |
| AF | MR-Egger | 87 | 0.9963 | 0.968953–1.024419 | 0.794687 |
| Weighted median | 87 | 1.0037 | 0.98574–1.022004 | 0.68795 | |
| IVW | 87 | 1.0028 | 0.985097–1.02091 | 0.755284 | |
| Simple mode | 87 | 0.9871 | 0.948271–1.02755 | 0.528316 | |
| Weighted mode | 87 | 1.0016 | 0.985722–1.017744 | 0.844586 | |
| MI | MR-Egger | 82 | 1.0663 | 1.022345–1.1122 | 0.003724 |
| Weighted median | 82 | 1.0680 | 1.025758–1.111929 | 0.001394 | |
| IVW | 82 | 1.0458 | 1.017061–1.075379 | 0.001636 | |
| Simple mode | 82 | 1.0480 | 0.947907–1.158437 | 0.363216 | |
| Weighted mode | 82 | 1.0685 | 1.031256–1.107087 | 0.000447 | |
| MR-Egger | 62 | 1.0010 | 1.00038806–1.001619716 | 0.00222287 | |
| Weighted median | 62 | 1.0006 | 0.999978267–1.001158133 | 0.059059183 | |
| IHD | IVW | 62 | 1.0006 | 1.000244475−1.001040326 | 0.001551915 |
| Simple mode | 62 | 1.0001 | 0.998491356–1.001828674 | 0.852802432 | |
| Weighted mode | 62 | 1.0006 | 1.000027694–1.001155086 | 0.044033966 |
MR estimates of rheumatoid arthritis associated with the risk of cardiovascular diseases.
Causality of genetic susceptibility to RA on the risk of MI and IHD
As presented in Table 2, the results of the IVW method indicated that RA was correlated with the increased risk of MI and IHD. In addition, the prevalence of MI in RA cases was 1.046-fold that of the control group [95% CI: (1.017–1.075), OR = 1.046, P = 0.0016] (Supplementary Figure S3), and increase of the log-transformed OR of RA by one unit elevated the risk of IHD [95% CI: (1.000–1.001), OR = 1.004, P = 0.002] (Supplementary Figure S4). MR analysis of RA and MI indicated that the results of the weighted median analysis were highly consistent with those of the IVW method. The MR analysis of RA, MI, and IHD showed that the results of the MR-Egger analysis were highly consistent with those obtained by the IVW method.
Analysis of horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity
As shown in Table 3, a series of methods were employed for MR analysis regarding the correlation of RA with arrhythmia, AF, MI, and IHD, in order to determine the presence of significant horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity in the present study. First, P-value was >0.05 in the heterogeneity test, demonstrating that SNPs had a negligible heterogeneity (Table 3). The fixed-effects IVW method was dominant in the MR analysis. The “leave-one-out” sensitivity analysis demonstrated that IVs involved in the present study had a negligible influence on the results (Supplementary Figure S5), and the funnel plot illustrates an asymmetric distribution of single IVs (Supplementary Figure S6), suggesting that the causality might not be affected by the potential bias.
Table 3
| Outcomes | Pleiotropy test | Heterogeneity test | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MR-egger | MR-egger | Inverse-variance weighted | |||||||
| Intercept | SE | P | Q | Q−df | Q−P-val | Q | Q−df | Q−P-val | |
| Arrhythmia | −1.92 × 10−05 | 4.055 × 10−05 | 0.6385 | 76.14 | 56 | 0.0380 | 76.44 | 57 | 0.0438 |
| AF | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.5484 | 221.27 | 85 | 4.3468 × 10−05 | 222.22 | 86 | 5.2687 × 10−05 |
| MI | −0.004 | 0.004 | 0.2325 | 106.34 | 80 | 0.0261 | 108.27 | 81 | 0.0232 |
| IHD | −7.63 × 10−05 | 5.061 × 10−05 | 0.1369 | 49.25 | 60 | 0.8376 | 51.53 | 61 | 0.8010 |
Testing of heterogeneity and pleiotropy of the RA-associated IVs from CVD GWAS-based data.
Cardiovascular risk factors did not influence the development of RA
Overall, as cardiovascular risk factors may influence RA development and strengthen the conclusion, reverse MR analysis was further performed. As shown in Table 4, the prevalence of RA in the arrhythmia group was not significantly different from that in the control group. Meanwhile, no significant association was found between the risk of AF, MI, IHD, and RA risk (Supplementary Figure S7).
Table 4
| Disease | Method | SNPs (n) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arrhythmia | IVW | 5 | 0.3123275 |
| Weighted median | 5 | 0.4035608 | |
| MR-Egger | 5 | 0.2961895 | |
| Weighted mode | 5 | 0.2066364 | |
| Simple mode | 5 | 0.5366099 | |
| AF | IVW | 104 | 0.9380365 |
| Weighted median | 104 | 0.6131080 | |
| MR-Egger | 104 | 0.6701567 | |
| Weighted mode | 104 | 0.5305349 | |
| Simple mode | 104 | 0.6706936 | |
| MI | IVW | 12 | 0.485987 |
| Weighted median | 12 | 0.075750 | |
| MR-Egger | 12 | 0.120265 | |
| Weighted mode | 12 | 0.272258 | |
| Simple mode | 12 | 0.139946 | |
| IHD | IVW | 3 | 0.576534 |
| Weighted median | 3 | 0.100359 | |
| MR-Egger | 3 | 0.129855 | |
| Weighted mode | 3 | 0.299454 | |
| Simple mode | 3 | 0.251141 |
Mr estimates of arrhythmia, AF, MI, and IHD on the risk for RA.
Discussion
The MR analysis was performed in the present study to explore the exact causality between RA and IHD based on large-scale GWAS. This study included multiple factors related to CVD, such as arrhythmia, AF, MI, and IHD. It was proved that RA increased the risk of CVD secondary to MI and IHD as opposed to AF and arrhythmia.
IHD in coexistence with RA is a proven main cardiovascular cause of death, which commonly imposes the highest disease burden among all CVDs worldwide (2). High BMI, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, high cholesterol level, and smoking are some of the various risk factors involved (3). However, high systolic blood pressure, high LDL-C level, and smoking are the three main contributors to the mortality of IHD (1). Apart from traditional Framingham risk factors, gender (26, 27) and psychosocial factors (28, 29) are noteworthy. In 1997, Wallberg-Jonsson et al. found that overall mortality due to CVD and IHD were elevated in seropositive RA (30). Studies reported that RA was closely associated with a higher risk of IHD. RA patients were at a higher risk of IHD than those without RA (16.6% vs. 12.8%) (6). A meta-analysis concluded that there was a 48% increase in the risk of CVD in patients with RA (9). A high risk of CVD-related death (50%) was reported in patients with RA, and 59% in those with IHD (11). To date, no significant difference has been found in the traditional Framingham risk factors between patients with and without RA. After excluding traditional risk factors for CVD, Esther Houri Levi et al. demonstrated that RA was the main cause of CVD after RA (6). From a conventional aspect, inflammatory factors, such as von Willebrand factor (VWF), induced CVD through endothelial damage/dysfunction, platelet activation, hypercoagulability, and angiogenesis in patients with RA (31, 32). It was also speculated that the pathogenesis of CVD in RA patients was different from that in non-RA patients.
Previous studies identified RA as an independent risk factor for CVD. The causal relationship between RA and CVD has still remained elusive. For instance, patients with RA were not at the higher risk of hyperlipidemia than general population, which was the “lipid paradox” (33), while a higher risk of CV events was found in patients with RA compared with individuals without RA (33, 34). In recent studies, researchers used the MR analysis, and it was revealed that patients with RA were at the increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), angina, hypertension, heart attack, arrhythmia, and stroke (10, 35). Kessler et al. concluded that IHD, non-IHD, and arrhythmia were the leading causes of cardiovascular complications in RA patients (36). The results of the present study indicated RA did not increase the risk of arrhythmia and AF. Various risk factors identified for arrhythmia and AF were age, genetic predisposition, BMI, hypertension, DM, obstructive sleep apnea, HF, MI, and smoking. It was speculated that chronic systemic inflammation was the leading cause of arrhythmia in patients with RA (37). Some scholars also showed that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) increased the risk of arrhythmia (38). It was demonstrated that ischemia and the cardiac autonomic nervous system play a vital role in the modulation of cardiac arrhythmogenesis (39). It is easier to understand that cardiac autonomic nerve system dysfunction causes arrhythmia than to explore inflammatory etiologies. Inflammation was not reported as a major cause of arrhythmia in diabetic patients (40). In RA patients, vagus nerve stimulation inhibited cytokine production, which was a type of “inflammatory reflex” (41). Arrhythmia is only a protective reflex, while it may not merely cause CVD in RA patients. Thus, it remains unclear whether inflammation is a driver or a secondary factor for arrhythmia in patients with RA (42).
An increased risk of IM and IHD in RA patients is consistent with previously reported findings (21). Studies assessed the risk of CAD in RA patients (35). RA patients had a different IHD pathophysiology compared with non-RA patients (43). Coronary microcirculation dysfunction was more likely to cause insidious ischemia than atherosclerosis (44). Recent studies have shown that a genetic variant of the RARB gene (rs116199914) contributed to the development of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with RA. Moreover, potential influences of the previously described cardiovascular risk loci NFKB1, MSRA, and ZC3HC1 were confirmed (45). Furthermore, other genetic polymorphisms in RA may increase the risk of CVD, including human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and related genes, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily genes, cytokines-related genes, chemokines-related genes, adipokines-related genes, and other genes (46). Neither anti-rheumatic drugs nor pro-inflammatory cytokine antagonists reduced the risk of CVD in RA patients (47). Therefore, inflammation and endothelial injury were not compelling enough to explain the risk of CVD in RA patients. Ischemia resulting from coronary microcirculation dysfunction may be the main cause of CVD. Exploring the mechanism of coronary microcirculation dysfunction in RA patients may be therefore advantages in preventing early cardiac dysfunction.
There were some limitations in the present study. Firstly, multiple methods were used to access the pleiotropy, although potential multiplicity might still be existed. Secondly, there might be a genetic diversity among different races. Thirdly, lower OR values were obtained compared with other studies. The clinical significance of the OR value remains to be further documented by the next studies.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the present study suggested that there was an increased risk of IHD and MI in patients with RA. This MR study might provide new genetic evidence for the causal relationship between RA and the risk of CVD. The findings revealed that the control of RA activity could reduce the risk of CVD. Prevention of early cardiac dysfunction should be promoted through exploring the mechanism of coronary microcirculation dysfunction in RA patients.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Author contributions
MW and CC: designed the study and drafted the manuscript. KM and BW: conducted data acquisition. DD, YQ and XZ: performed data analysis and manuscript revision. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This study was financially supported by the Young Talent Development Plan of Changzhou Health Commission (grant nos. CZQM2020034 and CZQM2020004), Young Talent Science and Technology Project of Changzhou Health Commission (grant no. QN201913), and Social Development Projects of Changzhou Science and Technology Bureau (grant no. CE20205039).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1099861/full#supplementary-material.
SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 1
Mendelian randomization analysis of RA and the risk of arrhythmia.
SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 2
Mendelian randomization analysis of RA and the risk of AF.
SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 3
Mendelian randomization analysis of RA and the risk of MI.
SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 4
Mendelian randomization analysis of RA and the risk of IHD.
SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 5
The MR “leave-one-out” sensitivity analysis of RA on arrhythmia, AF, MI, and IHD. (A) Arrhythmia. (B) AF. (C) MI. (D) IHD.
SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 6
Funnel plots of RA with arrhythmia, AF, and MI, IHD. The X-axis represents odds ratio (OR), and the Y-axis represents standard error (SE). (A) Arrhythmia. (B) AF. (C) MI. (D) IHD.
SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 7
MR testing of arrhythmia, AF, MI, and IHD associated with RA. The estimate of intercept can be interpreted as an estimate of the average pleiotropy of all SNPs, and the slope coefficient provides an estimate of the bias of the causal effect. (A) Arrhythmia. (B) AF. (C) MI. (D) IHD.
SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 1
SNPs used to analyze the causal relationship between RA and arrhythmia, AF, MI, and IHD.
References
1.
Safiri S Karamzad N Singh K Carson-Chahhoud K Adams C Nejadghaderi SA et al Burden of ischemic heart disease and its attributable risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019. Eur J Prev Cardiol. (2022) 29:420–31. 10.1093/eurjpc/zwab213
2.
Wang W Hu M Liu H Zhang X Li H Zhou F et al Global burden of disease study 2019 suggests that metabolic risk factors are the leading drivers of the burden of ischemic heart disease. Cell Metab. (2021) 33:1943–56e2. 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.08.005
3.
Nowbar AN Gitto M Howard JP Francis DP Al-Lamee R . Mortality from ischemic heart disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. (2019) 12:e005375. 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005375
4.
Bonita R Magnusson R Bovet P Zhao D Malta DC Geneau R et al Country actions to meet UN commitments on non-communicable diseases: a stepwise approach. Lancet. (2013) 381:575–84. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61993-X
5.
Yusuf S Hawken S Ounpuu S Dans T Avezum A Lanas F et al Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. (2004) 364:937–52. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9
6.
Houri Levi E Watad A Whitby A Tiosano S Comaneshter D Cohen AD et al Coexistence of ischemic heart disease and rheumatoid arthritis patients-A case control study. Autoimmun Rev. (2016) 15:393–6. 10.1016/j.autrev.2016.01.006
7.
Edwards CJ Syddall H Goswami R Goswami P Dennison EM Arden NK et al The autoantibody rheumatoid factor may be an independent risk factor for ischaemic heart disease in men. Heart. (2007) 93:1263–7. 10.1136/hrt.2006.097816
8.
England BR Thiele GM Anderson DR Mikuls TR . Increased cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis: mechanisms and implications. Br Med J . (2018) 361:k1036. 10.1136/bmj.k1036
9.
Avina-Zubieta JA Thomas J Sadatsafavi M Lehman AJ Lacaille D . Risk of incident cardiovascular events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Rheum Dis. (2012) 71:1524–9. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200726
10.
Qiu S Li M Jin S Lu H Hu Y . Rheumatoid arthritis and cardio-cerebrovascular disease: a Mendelian randomization study. Front Genet. (2021) 12:745224. 10.3389/fgene.2021.745224
11.
Rezus E Macovei LA Burlui AM Cardoneanu A Rezus C . Ischemic heart disease and rheumatoid arthritis-two conditions, the same background. Life. (2021) 11:1042. 10.3390/life11101042
12.
Hu S Lin C Cai X Zhu X Lv F Nie L et al The biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and the risk of cardiovascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mediators Inflamm. (2021) 2021:7712587. 10.1155/2021/7712587
13.
Zhang T Zhao JV Schooling CM . The associations of plasma phospholipid arachidonic acid with cardiovascular diseases: a Mendelian randomization study. EBioMedicine. (2021) 63:103189. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.103189
14.
Zhao JV Schooling CM . Effect of linoleic acid on ischemic heart disease and its risk factors: a Mendelian randomization study. BMC Med. (2019) 17:61. 10.1186/s12916-019-1293-x
15.
Ng JCM Schooling CM . Effect of glucagon on ischemic heart disease and its risk factors: a Mendelian randomization study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2020) 105:dgaa259. 10.1210/clinem/dgaa259
16.
Nordestgaard BG Palmer TM Benn M Zacho J Tybjaerg-Hansen A Davey Smith G et al The effect of elevated body mass index on ischemic heart disease risk: causal estimates from a Mendelian randomisation approach. PLoS Med. (2012) 9:e1001212. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001212
17.
Kwok MK Schooling CM . Mendelian randomization study on atrial fibrillation and cardiovascular disease subtypes. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:18682. 10.1038/s41598-021-98058-w
18.
Zhao JV Schooling CM . Thyroid function and ischemic heart disease: a Mendelian randomization study. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:8515. 10.1038/s41598-017-07592-z
19.
Zou K Xiao FK Li HY Zhou Q Ban L Yang M et al Risk of cardiovascular disease in Chinese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study based on hospital medical records in 10 years. PLoS ONE. (2017) 12:e0180376. 10.1371/journal.pone.0180376
20.
Logstrup BB Ellingsen T Pedersen AB Kjaersgaard A Botker HE Maeng M . Development of heart failure in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a Danish population-based study. Eur J Clin Invest. (2018) 48:e12915. 10.1111/eci.12915
21.
Alsing CL Nystad TW Igland J Gjesdal CG Midtbo H Tell GS et al Trends in the occurrence of ischaemic heart disease over time in rheumatoid arthritis: 1821 patients from 1972 to 2017. Scand J Rheumatol. (2022):1–10. 10.1080/03009742.2022.2040116.
22.
Mantel A Holmqvist M Andersson DC Lund LH Askling J . Association between rheumatoid arthritis and risk of ischemic and nonischemic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2017) 69:1275–85. 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.12.033
23.
Liu Z Suo C Fan H Zhang T Jin L Chen X . Dissecting causal relationships between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease proxied by chronically elevated alanine transaminase levels and 34 extrahepatic diseases. Metab Clin Exp. (2022) 135:155270. 10.1016/j.metabol.2022.155270
24.
Skrivankova VW Richmond RC Woolf BAR Davies NM Swanson SA Vanderweele TJ et al Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using Mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration. Br Med J. (2021) 375:n2233. 10.1136/bmj.n2233
25.
Wu F Huang Y Hu J Shao Z . Mendelian randomization study of inflammatory bowel disease and bone mineral density. BMC Med. (2020) 18:312. 10.1186/s12916-020-01778-5
26.
Peters SA Woodward M Lam TH Fang X Suh I Ueshema H et al Sex disparities in risk and risk factors for ischemic heart disease in the Asia-Pacific region. Eur J Prev Cardiol. (2014) 21:639–46. 10.1177/2047487313484689
27.
Minissian MB Mehta PK Hayes SN Park K Wei J Bairey Merz CN et al Ischemic heart disease in young women: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2022) 80:1014–22. 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.057
28.
Mehta PK Wei J Wenger NK . Ischemic heart disease in women: a focus on risk factors. Trends Cardiovasc Med. (2015) 25:140–51. 10.1016/j.tcm.2014.10.005
29.
Wu M Zhu Y Lv J Guo Y Yang L Chen Y et al Association of anxiety with cardiovascular disease in a Chinese cohort of 0.5 million adults. J Affect Disord. (2022) 315:291–6. 10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.008
30.
Wallberg-Jonsson S Ohman ML Dahlqvist SR . Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis in Northern Sweden. J Rheumatol. (1997) 24:445–51.
31.
Bhatia GS Sosin MD Khattak FH Davis RC Lip GY . Rheumatoid disease and ischaemic heart disease: insights from pathophysiology and vascular biology. Int J Cardiol. (2005) 105:1–10. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.12.064
32.
Bhatia GS Sosin MD Patel JV Grindulis KA Khattak FH Davis RC et al Plasma indices of endothelial and platelet activation in rheumatoid disease: relationship to cardiovascular co-morbidity. Int J Cardiol. (2009) 134:97–103. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.01.038
33.
Lauper K Gabay C . Cardiovascular risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Immunopathol. (2017) 39:447–59. 10.1007/s00281-017-0632-2
34.
Boyer JF Gourraud PA Cantagrel A Davignon JL Constantin A . Traditional cardiovascular risk factors in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis. Joint Bone Spine. (2011) 78:179–83. 10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.07.016
35.
Zhang K Jia Y Wang R Guo D Yang P Sun L et al Rheumatoid arthritis and the risk of major cardiometabolic diseases: a Mendelian randomization study. Scand J Rheumatol. (2022a):1–7. 10.1080/03009742.2022.2070988
36.
Kessler J Totoson P Devaux S Moretto J Wendling D Demougeot C . Animal models to study pathogenesis and treatments of cardiac disorders in rheumatoid arthritis: advances and challenges for clinical translation. Pharmacol Res. (2021) 170:105494. 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105494
37.
Lazzerini PE Capecchi PL Laghi-Pasini F . Systemic inflammation and arrhythmic risk: lessons from rheumatoid arthritis. Eur Heart J. (2017) 38:1717–27. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw208
38.
Malaty M Kayes T Amarasekera AT Kodsi M Macintyre CR Tan TC . Incidence and treatment of arrhythmias secondary to coronavirus infection in humans: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Invest. (2021) 51:e13428. 10.1111/eci.13428
39.
Manolis AA Manolis TA Apostolopoulos EJ Apostolaki NE Melita H Manolis AS . The role of the autonomic nervous system in cardiac arrhythmias: the neuro-cardiac axis, more foe than friend?Trends Cardiovasc Med. (2021) 31:290–302. 10.1016/j.tcm.2020.04.011
40.
Spartalis M Pantelidis P Kontogiannis C Paschou SA Spartalis E Iliopoulos DC et al The complex relationship between diabetes and cardiac arrhythmias: pathophysiology and mechanisms. Curr Pharm Des. (2022) 28:2129–30. 10.2174/1381612828666220720095433
41.
Tracey KJ . The inflammatory reflex. Nature. (2002) 420:853–9. 10.1038/nature01321
42.
Meraviglia V Alcalde M Campuzano O Bellin M . Inflammation in the pathogenesis of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: secondary event or active driver?Front Cardiovasc Med. (2021) 8:784715. 10.3389/fcvm.2021.784715
43.
Crowson CS Nicola PJ Kremers HM O'Fallon WM Therneau TM Jacobsen SJ et al How much of the increased incidence of heart failure in rheumatoid arthritis is attributable to traditional cardiovascular risk factors and ischemic heart disease? Arthritis Rheum. (2005) 52:3039–44. 10.1002/art.21349
44.
Zanatta E Colombo C D’Amico G D’Humieres T Dal Lin C Tona F . Inflammation and coronary microvascular dysfunction in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:5563. 10.3390/ijms20225563
45.
Lopez-Mejias R Carmona FD Genre F Remuzgo-Martinez S Gonzalez-Juanatey C Corrales A et al Identification of a 3′-untranslated genetic variant of RARB associated with carotid intima-media thickness in rheumatoid arthritis: a genome-wide association study. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2019) 71:351–60. 10.1002/art.40734
46.
Lopez-Mejias R Castaneda S Gonzalez-Juanatey C Corrales A Ferraz-Amaro I Genre F et al Cardiovascular risk assessment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the relevance of clinical, genetic and serological markers. Autoimmun Rev. (2016) 15:1013–30. 10.1016/j.autrev.2016.07.026
47.
Zhang M Wang M Tai Y Tao J Zhou W Han Y et al Triggers of cardiovascular diseases in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Probl Cardiol. (2022b) 47:100853. 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2021.100853
Summary
Keywords
rheumatoid arthritis, ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, arrhythmia, Mendelian randomization analysis, genome-wide association study
Citation
Wang M, Chao C, Mei K, Di D, Qian Y, Wang B and Zhang X (2023) Relationship between rheumatoid arthritis and cardiovascular comorbidity, causation or co-occurrence: A Mendelian randomization study. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 10:1099861. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1099861
Received
16 November 2022
Accepted
28 February 2023
Published
17 March 2023
Volume
10 - 2023
Edited by
Przemysław J. Kotyla, Medical University of Silesia, Poland
Reviewed by
Patrick Dessein, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa Miguel Angel González-Gay, University of Cantabria, Spain
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Wang, Chao, Mei, Di, Qian, Wang and Zhang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Bin Wang colin_iverson@163.com Xiaoying Zhang zhangxy6689996@163.com
These authors have contributed equally to this work
Specialty Section: This article was submitted to Cardiovascular Metabolism, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.