Front. Cardiovasc. Med.Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicineFront. Cardiovasc. Med.2297-055XFrontiers Media S.A.10.3389/fcvm.2023.1220717Cardiovascular MedicineCorrectionCorrigendum: Effect of epicardial fat volume on outcomes after left atrial posterior wall isolation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillationKimDaehoonYuHee TaeKwonOh-SeokKimTae-HoonUhmJae-SunJoungBoyoungLeeMoon-HyoungPakHui-Nam*Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Approved by: Frontiers Editorial Office,Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
atrial fibrillationepicardial adipose tissueposterior wall 1solationcatheter ablation-atrial fibrillationrhythm outcomesection-at-acceptanceCardiac RhythmologyA Corrigendum on Effect of epicardial fat volume on outcomes after left atrial posterior wall isolation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation by Kim D, Yu HT, Kwon OS, Kim TH, Uhm JS, Joung B, Lee MH, Pak HN. (2022) Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 9:1005760. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1005760
In the published article, there was an error. Incorrect numbers were used.
A correction has been made to Results, Additional posterior wall box isolation in patients with a larger epicardial adipose tissue volume, Paragraph 2. This sentence previously stated:
“After overlap weighting, the early recurrence was less frequent in the additional POBI group (38.6%) than in the CPVI alone group (52.4%) (P = 0.001) (Table 3).”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“After overlap weighting, the early recurrence was less frequent in the additional POBI group (39.4%) than in the CPVI alone group (54.1%) (P = 0.001) (Table 3).”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.