Abstract
Objective:
To explore a nomogram prediction model for perioperative heart failure (HF) in elderly patients with intertrochanteric femoral fracture (ITF) based on Lasso-Logistic regression.
Methods:
The clinical data of 345 elderly patients with ITF admitted to our hospital were retrospectively collected (as the training set). In addition, the clinical data of 251 elderly patients with ITF admitted to Hunan University of Medicine General Hospital were collected (as the validation set). Patients were separated into the HF group and the non-HF group according to whether HF occurred during the perioperative period. The clinical data of patients were collected.
Results:
According to Lasso-Logistic analysis, age, history of heart disease, Garden typing, preoperative electrolyte imbalance, 24 h positive balance of intake and output, and Hb were the influencing factors of HF occurrence during the perioperative period in elderly ITF patients (P < 0.05). The ROC curve showed that the AUC of this model was 0.886, the C-index was 0.857, the H-L test was χ2 = 7.643, P = 0.711, and its predicted risk of HF occurrence was highly consistent with the actual result. The DCA curve showed a relatively good positive net benefit within the probability range of 0.15∼0.86. The external validation ROC curve showed that the AUC of this model was 0.911, the C-index was 0.834, the H-L test was χ2 = 7.564, P = 0.705, and the predicted risk of HF was highly consistent with the actual result. The DCA curve showed a good positive net benefit within the probability range of 0.15∼0.73.
Conclusion:
The nomogram model constructed based on Lasso-Logistic regression in this study can assist clinicians in assessing the risk of HF in elderly ITF patients during the perioperative period, thereby implementing effective preventive measures.
1 Introduction
With the intensification of population aging, health issues among older adults have attracted widespread attention. Declines in limb mobility and balance in elderly individuals markedly increase the risk of osteoporosis and falls, which can lead to hip fractures. Intertrochanteric femoral fracture (ITF) is one of the common types, with an incidence that has been increasing year by year (). ITF mainly occurs between the basal region of the femoral neck and the inferior margin of the lesser trochanter. Because the bone quality in the trochanteric region is relatively weak, fractures readily occur under external force. Once a fracture occurs, patients often require prolonged bed rest and immobilization; combined with stress and other factors, this can easily lead to heart failure (HF), with an incidence of up to 10%–27% (, ). Moreover, most patients have underlying diseases prior to fracture, and perioperative factors such as electrolyte disturbances may also induce HF, thereby increasing mortality and disability rates (). Therefore, identifying factors associated with perioperative HF and implementing early prevention in clinical practice can improve patient prognosis. Lasso–Logistic regression can be used clinically to screen influencing factors: Lasso is first applied to select predictive variables and reduce overfitting among factors, followed by Logistic analysis to predict the impact of predictors on adverse events, thereby establishing a nomogram model to estimate risk values (, ). Studies have shown that a nomogram constructed based on HDL-C to predict preoperative deep venous thrombosis in ITF patients can help healthcare professionals assess the likelihood of thrombosis (). The construction of related factors and predictive models for postoperative infection after ITF indicates that postoperative infection is influenced by multiple factors; the predictive model developed in these studies shows high predictive accuracy and clinical utility, aiding early identification and intervention for high-risk patients (). Based on the above, there are currently few reports on nomogram studies of perioperative HF in elderly ITF patients. Therefore, this study aims to explore a nomogram prediction model for perioperative HF in elderly ITF patients based on Lasso–Logistic regression.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 General information
Clinical data of 345 elderly ITF patients admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to January 2024 were retrospectively collected as the training set. Additionally, clinical data of 251 elderly ITF patients admitted to Hunan University of Medicine General Hospital, a general hospital in Huaihua City, Hunan Province, China, from February 2024 to September 2025 were collected as the validation set. The validation set was collected from this single hospital, and the same inclusion and exclusion criteria as those used for the training set were applied. Patients were divided into the HF group and the non-HF group according to whether HF occurred perioperatively. The case collection flowchart is shown in Figure 1. Inclusion criteria for the training and validation sets were: (1) patients clinically diagnosed with fresh closed ITF who underwent preoperative evaluation and completed reduction and internal fixation surgery; (2) age ≥75 years; (3) meeting the diagnostic criteria for HF (). Heart failure was diagnosed when any two or more of the following criteria were met: the presence of signs and symptoms of heart failure, such as chest tightness, orthopnea, pulmonary rales, and lower-extremity edema; significantly elevated serum NT-proBNP levels; pulmonary congestion or pulmonary edema on chest radiography or CT; and abnormal ventricular systolic and/or diastolic function on echocardiography; (4) surgery and perioperative management performed by the same medical team; (5) complete clinical data. Exclusion criteria were: (1) pathological fractures; (2) malignant tumors; (3) injury to vital organs such as the heart or liver; (4) multiple fractures at other sites; (5) neurovascular injury; (6) severe respiratory diseases; (7) presence of non-cardiogenic factors: pneumonia was defined by focal pulmonary consolidation on chest imaging accompanied by elevated inflammatory markers; pulmonary embolism was defined by a filling defect in the pulmonary artery accompanied by elevated D-dimer levels; acute exacerbation of COPD was defined by wheezing with carbon dioxide retention and a favorable response to bronchodilator therapy; and isolated postoperative hypoxemia was defined as a transient decrease in oxygen saturation after surgery, without elevated BNP levels or abnormalities in cardiac structure or function, with rapid recovery after analgesia and oxygen therapy. This study was approved by the hospital ethics committee.
Figure 1
2.2 Clinical data
Clinical data were collected from the hospital electronic medical record system, including age, sex, preoperative ASA classification, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, history of heart disease, cerebral infarction, preoperative NYHA classification, Garden fracture classification, preoperative electrolyte disturbance, anesthesia method, internal fixation method, infusion of human serum albumin, constipation, cognitive impairment, time from injury to surgery, operation time, perioperative blood loss, positive 24-h fluid balance, hemoglobin (Hb), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), albumin (ALB), and white blood cell count (WBC). Variables with a missing data rate exceeding 5% were excluded to ensure the reliability and rigor of the results.
2.3 Statistical analysis
SPSS 25.0 was used for data analysis. Measurement data were analyzed using the t test and are expressed as (). Categorical data were analyzed using the χ2 test and are expressed as n (%). Lasso–Logistic regression was applied to analyze factors influencing perioperative HF in elderly ITF patients. R software was used to construct the nomogram prediction model for perioperative HF. Internal validation was performed using the Bootstrap method. ROC curves and calibration curves were used to evaluate the discrimination and consistency of the nomogram model. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to assess the clinical application value of the model. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3 Results
3.1 Comparison of clinical data between HF and non-HF groups in the training set
There were significant differences between the HF and non-HF groups in age, history of heart disease, preoperative NYHA classification, Garden classification, preoperative electrolyte disturbance, positive 24-h fluid balance, and Hb (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in other clinical variables (P > 0.05). See Table 1.
Table 1
| Factor | HF group (n = 63) | Non HF group (n = 282) | t/χ2 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years old) | 88.95 ± 5.68 | 82.85 ± 4.12 | 9.853 | <0.001 |
| gender | 0.981 | 0.322 | ||
| male | 18 (28.57) | 64 (22.70) | ||
| female | 45 (71.43) | 218 (77.30) | ||
| Preoperative ASA Classification | 2.715 | 0.099 | ||
| Grade I∼II | 29 (46.03) | 162 (57.45) | ||
| Grade III∼IV | 34 (53.97) | 120 (42.55) | ||
| Chronic kidney disease | 0.075 | 0.784 | ||
| yes | 28 (44.44) | 120 (42.55) | ||
| no | 35 (55.56) | 162 (57.45) | ||
| Hypertension | 0.786 | 0.375 | ||
| yes | 45 (71.43) | 185 (65.60) | ||
| no | 18 (28.57) | 97 (34.40) | ||
| Diabetes | 1.501 | 0.220 | ||
| yes | 28 (44.44) | 102 (36.17) | ||
| no | 35 (55.56) | 180 (63.83) | ||
| History of heart disease | 25.636 | <0.001 | ||
| yes | 43 (68.25) | 95 (33.69) | ||
| no | 20 (31.75) | 187 (66.31) | ||
| Cerebral infarction | 0.492 | 0.483 | ||
| yes | 15 (23.81) | 56 (19.86) | ||
| no | 48 (76.19) | 226 (80.14) | ||
| Preoperative NYHA Classification | 6.747 | 0.009 | ||
| Grade I∼II | 21 (33.33) | 145 (51.42) | ||
| Grade III∼IV | 42 (66.67) | 137 (48.58) | ||
| Garden Typing | 23.003 | <0.001 | ||
| Type I∼II | 17 (26.98) | 170 (60.28) | ||
| Type III∼IV | 46 (73.02) | 112 (39.72) | ||
| Preoperative electrolyte imbalance | 28.481 | <0.001 | ||
| yes | 52 (82.54) | 128 (45.39) | ||
| no | 11 (17.46) | 154 (54.61) | ||
| Anesthesia method | 3.592 | 0.058 | ||
| General anesthesia | 36 (57.14) | 124 (43.97) | ||
| Not general anesthesia | 27 (42.86) | 158 (56.03) | ||
| Internal fixation method | 0.194 | 0.660 | ||
| Internal fixation with steel plate | 21 (33.33) | 86 (30.50) | ||
| Intramedullary nailing fixation | 42 (66.67) | 196 (69.50) | ||
| Infusion of human albumin | 0.523 | 0.470 | ||
| yes | 38 (60.32) | 156 (55.32) | ||
| no | 25 (39.68) | 126 (44.68) | ||
| Constipation | 0.998 | 0.318 | ||
| yes | 19 (30.18) | 68 (24.11) | ||
| no | 44 (69.84) | 214 (75.89) | ||
| Cognitive impairment | 0.158 | 0.691 | ||
| yes | 16 (25.40) | 65 (23.05) | ||
| no | 47 (74.60) | 217 (76.95) | ||
| Time from injury to surgery (d) | 3.89 ± 0.45 | 3.92 ± 0.52 | 0.424 | 0.672 |
| Surgery time (min) | 180.58 ± 24.15 | 178.32 ± 26.45 | 0.623 | 0.534 |
| Perioperative blood loss (mL) | 1,214.68 ± 310.15 | 1,209.56 ± 246.25 | 0.142 | 0.887 |
| 24 h positive balance of intake and output | 1,298.62 ± 104.15 | 946.25 ± 98.65 | 25.371 | <0.001 |
| Hb (g/L) | 85.69 ± 4.96 | 97.56 ± 5.16 | 16.622 | <0.001 |
| LVEF (%) | 54.69 ± 9.85 | 56.43 ± 10.42 | 1.210 | 0.227 |
| ALB (g/L) | 31.25 ± 5.21 | 32.61 ± 5.19 | 1.879 | 0.061 |
| WBC (×109/L) | 11.15 ± 2.15 | 10.98 ± 2.46 | 0.507 | 0.613 |
Comparison of clinical data between HF and non-HF groups in the training set.
3.2 Lasso–logistic regression analysis of factors influencing perioperative HF in elderly ITF patients
Perioperative HF in elderly ITF patients (yes=1, no = 0) was used as the dependent variable. Indicators with P < 0.05, including history of heart disease (yes=1, no = 0), preoperative NYHA classification (I–II = 0, III–IV = 1), Garden classification (I–II = 0, III–IV = 1), preoperative electrolyte disturbance (yes=1, no = 0), age, positive 24-h fluid balance, and Hb (entered as original values), were used as independent variables. Lasso analysis was performed using R software. When λ=0.02145463, six predictive factors were screened, including age, history of heart disease, Garden classification, preoperative electrolyte disturbance, positive 24-h fluid balance, and Hb (Figure 2). Multicollinearity testing of variables selected by Lasso regression showed variance inflation factors <5, indicating no interaction among factors. Logistic regression analysis (forward stepwise method) showed that age, history of heart disease, Garden classification, preoperative electrolyte disturbance, positive 24-h fluid balance, and Hb were influencing factors for perioperative HF in elderly ITF patients (P < 0.05). See Table 2.
Figure 2
Table 2
| Variable | Β value | SE value | Wald value | P value | OR value | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 1.138 | 0.214 | 28.286 | <0.001 | 3.121 | 2.052–4.747 |
| History of heart disease | 1.516 | 0.648 | 5.463 | 0.019 | 4.554 | 1.278–16.231 |
| Garden Typing | 0.699 | 0.243 | 8.278 | 0.004 | 2.012 | 1.250–2.239 |
| Preoperative electrolyte imbalance | 0.972 | 0.231 | 30.065 | <0.001 | 2.643 | 1.681–4.157 |
| 24 h positive balance of intake and output | 0.035 | 0.006 | 13.797 | <0.001 | 1.036 | 1.023–1.049 |
| Hb | −1.064 | 0.218 | 23.831 | <0.001 | 0.345 | 0.225–0.529 |
| constant | −37.323 | 8.024 | 21.634 | <0.001 | <0.001 | - |
Lasso-Logistic regression analysis of factors affecting perioperative heart failure in elderly patients with ITF.
3.3 Construction of the nomogram model for perioperative HF in elderly ITF patients
Based on the LASSO–Logistic regression, a nomogram model was constructed with P = ex/ (1 + ex), where x = −37.323 + 1.138×age + 1.516×history of heart disease + 0.699×Garden classification + 0.972×preoperative electrolyte disturbance + 0.035×positive 24-h fluid balance−1.064×Hb. To calculate the score, a vertical line is drawn from each variable to the Points axis, and the scores for all variables are then summed to determine the Total Points. Finally, a vertical line is drawn downward from the Total Points axis to determine the probability of HF in the patient (, ). For example, a total score of 116 corresponds to a 72% probability of HF. See Figure 3.
Figure 3
3.4 Internal validation of the nomogram model for perioperative HF in elderly ITF patients
The ROC curve showed that the AUC for predicting perioperative HF was 0.886 (95% CI: 0.816–0.946), with a sensitivity of 89.24% and a specificity of 80.13%. Internal validation using the Bootstrap method (1,000 repetitions) showed a C-index of 0.857. The Hosmer–Lemeshow test yielded χ2 = 7.643, P = 0.711, indicating high agreement between predicted HF risk and actual outcomes. See Figure 4.
Figure 4
3.5 Curve of the internally validated nomogram model
The DCA curve showed good positive net benefit within a probability range of 0.15–0.86, indicating good clinical application value of the model. See Figure 5.
Figure 5
3.6 Comparison of clinical data between HF and non-HF groups in the validation set
There were significant differences between the HF and non-HF groups in age, history of heart disease, preoperative NYHA classification, Garden classification, preoperative electrolyte disturbance, positive 24-h fluid balance, and Hb (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed for other variables (P > 0.05). See Table 3.
Table 3
| Factor | HF group (n = 45) | Non HF group (n = 206) | t/χ2 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years old) | 89.59 ± 5.45 | 83.16 ± 5.33 | 7.302 | <0.001 |
| gender | 0.489 | 0.484 | ||
| male | 12 (26.67) | 45 (21.84) | ||
| female | 33 (73.33) | 161 (78.16) | ||
| Preoperative ASA Classification | 1.198 | 0.274 | ||
| Grade I∼II | 21 (46.67) | 78 (37.86) | ||
| Grade III∼IV | 24 (53.33) | 128 (62.14) | ||
| Chronic kidney disease | 0.110 | 0.740 | ||
| yes | 20 (44.44) | 86 (41.75) | ||
| no | 25 (55.56) | 120 (58.25) | ||
| Hypertension | 0.773 | 0.379 | ||
| yes | 34 (75.56) | 142 (68.93) | ||
| no | 11 (24.44) | 64 (31.07) | ||
| Diabetes | 0.015 | 0.904 | ||
| yes | 19 (42.22) | 89 (43.20) | ||
| no | 26 (57.78) | 117 (56.80) | ||
| History of heart disease | 19.980 | <0.001 | ||
| yes | 30 (66.67) | 64 (31.07) | ||
| no | 15 (33.33) | 142 (68.93) | ||
| Cerebral infarction | 0.687 | 0.407 | ||
| yes | 10 (22.22) | 35 (16.99) | ||
| no | 35 (77.78) | 171 (83.01) | ||
| Preoperative NYHA Classification | 5.842 | 0.016 | ||
| Grade I∼II | 14 (31.11) | 105 (50.97) | ||
| Grade III∼IV | 31 (68.89) | 101 (49.03) | ||
| Garden Typing | 16.495 | <0.001 | ||
| Type I∼II | 14 (31.11) | 132 (64.08) | ||
| Type III∼IV | 31 (68.89) | 74 (35.92) | ||
| Preoperative electrolyte imbalance | 27.697 | <0.001 | ||
| yes | 35 (77.78) | 72 (34.95) | ||
| no | 10 (22.22) | 134 (65.05) | ||
| Anesthesia method | 0.539 | 0.463 | ||
| General anesthesia | 25 (55.56) | 102 (49.51) | ||
| Not general anesthesia | 20 (44.44) | 104 (50.49) | ||
| Internal fixation method | 0.011 | 0.917 | ||
| Internal fixation with steel plate | 15 (33.33) | 67 (32.52) | ||
| Intramedullary nailing fixation | 30 (66.67) | 139 (67.48) | ||
| Infusion of human albumin | 0.024 | 0.876 | ||
| yes | 27 (60.32) | 121 (58.74) | ||
| no | 18 (40.00) | 85 (4,126) | ||
| Constipation | 0.158 | 0.691 | ||
| yes | 14 (31.11) | 58 (28.16) | ||
| no | 31 (68.89) | 148 (71.84) | ||
| Cognitive impairment | 0.072 | 0.789 | ||
| yes | 12 (26.67) | 51 (24.76) | ||
| no | 33 (73.33) | 155 (75.24) | ||
| Time from injury to surgery (d) | 3.91 ± 0.48 | 3.78 ± 0.46 | 1.704 | 0.090 |
| Surgery time (min) | 180.46 ± 23.16 | 179.51 ± 24.25 | 0.240 | 0.811 |
| Perioperative blood loss (mL) | 1,209.74 ± 306.55 | 1,206.54 ± 286.52 | 0.062 | 0.947 |
| 24 h positive balance of intake and output | 1,189.52 ± 103.45 | 951.62 ± 99.43 | 14.436 | <0.001 |
| Hb (g/L) | 84.23 ± 4.85 | 98.26 ± 5.01 | 17.114 | <0.001 |
| LVEF (%) | 55.12 ± 9.42 | 56.38 ± 10.42 | 0.747 | 0.456 |
| ALB (g/L) | 32.32 ± 5.14 | 32.24 ± 5.21 | 0.094 | 0.926 |
| WBC (×109/L | 11.13 ± 2.04 | 10.86 ± 2.01 | 0.814 | 0.416 |
Comparison of clinical data between HF and non-HF groups in the validation set.
3.7 External validation of the nomogram model for perioperative HF in elderly ITF patients
The ROC curve showed that the AUC for predicting perioperative HF was 0.911 (95% CI: 0.859–0.964), with a sensitivity of 82.28% and a specificity of 81.34%. Bootstrap internal validation (1,000 repetitions) showed a C-index of 0.834. The Hosmer–Lemeshow test yielded χ2 = 7.564, P = 0.705, indicating high agreement between predicted HF risk and actual outcomes. See Figure 6.
Figure 6
3.8 Curve of the externally validated nomogram model
The DCA curve showed good positive net benefit within a probability range of 0.15–0.73, indicating good clinical application value of the model. See Figure 7.
Figure 7
4 Discussion
Statistics indicate that approximately 1.6 million patients worldwide experience hip fractures each year, with a year-by-year increase among elderly individuals. As one type of hip fracture, ITF often occurs in older patients with comorbid medical conditions, increasing treatment difficulty. Conservative treatment can be effective for some ITF patients, but prolonged bed rest may lead to cardiopulmonary complications. It is widely accepted that early surgery and early mobilization can reduce related complications and mortality (, ). Surgical treatment itself is traumatic and may exacerbate pre-existing conditions such as hyperglycemia and HF during the perioperative period; moreover, patients with fractures complicated by HF have a significantly increased risk of death (). In this study, the incidence of perioperative HF in elderly ITF patients was 18.26% (63/345), similar to the previously reported 18.37% (138/751) (), indicating a relatively high incidence. Therefore, identifying factors associated with perioperative HF and promptly screening high-risk populations for intervention is clinically important.
Lasso–Logistic analysis in this study showed that age, history of heart disease, Garden classification, preoperative electrolyte disturbance, positive 24-h fluid balance, and Hb were influencing factors for perioperative HF in elderly ITF patients. The underlying reasons are as follows. (1) In very elderly patients, organ function declines; combined with the stress of trauma and anesthesia, systemic deterioration may occur, triggering latent diseases. Elderly individuals also exhibit reduced cardiac compliance and reserve capacity, leading to diminished compensatory ability. Perioperative changes in internal environment and cardiac preload and afterload can damage myocardial cells, resulting in decompensated cardiac function and HF, especially in patients aged >80 years, who exhibit marked degenerative changes in cardiomyocytes, substantially reduced cardiac systolic and diastolic reserve, decreased vascular elasticity, and extremely poor tolerance to perioperative stress; even minor fluctuations in volume load may increase the risk of HF (, ). Thus, special attention should be paid to very elderly patients. (2) In patients with a history of heart disease(chronic heart failure, previous myocardial infarction/coronary heart disease, persistent atrial fibrillation, hypertensive heart disease, and valvular heart disease were considered high-risk types), long-term impairment of cardiac function combined with trauma and surgical stress reduces cardiac pumping ability, aggravates cardiac dysfunction, and leads to decompensation; such patients are more prone to perioperative HF (, ). Therefore, preoperative cardiac risk stratification may be performed in patients with the aforementioned structural heart diseases, with enhanced perioperative cardiac function monitoring and fluid management. (3) Garden classification is commonly used clinically for femoral fractures; higher grades indicate more severe impairment of femoral head blood supply. In this study, patients with type III or above were more likely to develop perioperative HF, mainly because unstable fractures cause greater soft tissue damage and more severe impairment of femoral head blood flow. In elderly patients with poor nutrition, increased vascular fragility, and low pain tolerance, organ function may deteriorate, leading to hemodynamic instability and abnormal cardiac pump function, thereby inducing HF (). (4) Preoperative electrolyte disturbances can markedly increase levels of prostaglandins and catecholamines in elderly patients, causing internal environment imbalance and multiple adverse reactions, thereby triggering HF (, ). (5) After fracture, patients may experience blood and fluid loss due to surgery, necessitating fluid replacement to maintain organ perfusion. However, excessive or rapid perioperative fluid infusion can sharply increase circulating blood volume and cardiac preload in a short time, exceeding the cardiac compliance of elderly patients and ultimately inducing HF (). (6) Reduced preoperative Hb levels decrease the oxygen-carrying capacity of red blood cells, leading to tissue hypoxia, which promotes NO release and activates the sympathetic nervous system, resulting in sodium and water retention. Red blood cells contain antioxidants; anemia increases oxidative stress and free radical production, causing myocardial injury and leading to HF. In this study, we found that when the Hb level was below the cutoff value of 80.12 g/L, reduced myocardial oxygen supply combined with a hyperdynamic circulatory state significantly increased the risk of perioperative HF (, ).
The nomogram model developed in this study showed AUC values of 0.857 and 0.911 and C-indices of 0.857 and 0.834 in the training and validation sets, respectively, indicating good consistency and high agreement between predicted HF risk and actual outcomes. The DCA curves showed that the model had high clinical value within threshold probability ranges of 0.15–0.86 and 0.15–0.73, respectively, and can assist clinicians in early prevention and improvement of patient prognosis.
In summary, the nomogram model based on Lasso–Logistic regression constructed in this study can assist clinicians in assessing the risk of perioperative HF in elderly ITF patients and implementing effective preventive measures. This study has limitations, including a relatively small sample size and its retrospective design. Future studies will expand the sample size and conduct prospective validation.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
This study involving human participants was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Medical. The study was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration. Written informed consent for participation was obtained from the patients.
Author contributions
QS: Investigation, Writing – original draft, Data curation, Methodology, Conceptualization. YW: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Methodology. ZZ: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Supervision. HT: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Data curation.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the 2025 National Clinical Key Specialty Construction Project (Trauma Center) (Hunan Provincial Health Commission Letter [2025] No. 10).
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1.
FischerHMaleitzkeTEderCAhmadSStöckleUBraunKF. Management of proximal femur fractures in the elderly: current concepts and treatment options. Eur J Med Res. (2021) 26(1):86. 10.1186/s40001-021-00556-0
2.
BedrettinASahinFYucel MO. Treatment of intertrochanteric femur fracture with closed external fixation in high-risk geriatric patients: can it be the most reliable method that reduces mortality to minimum compared to proximal femoral nail and hemiarthroplasty?Medicine (Baltimore). (2022) 101(1):e28369. 10.1097/MD.0000000000028369
3.
JürgensLSarabhaiTKostevK. In-Hospital mortality among elderly patients hospitalized for femur fracture with and without diabetes Mellitus: a multicenter case-control study. J Clin Med. (2024) 13(21):6484. 10.3390/jcm13216484
4.
VitielloRPesareECapeceGDi GialleonardoEDe MatthaeisAFranceschiFet al. Surgical timing and clinical factor predicting in-hospital mortality in older adults with hip fractures: a neuronal network analysis. J Orthop Traumatol. (2025) 26(1):30. 10.1186/s10195-025-00846-x
5.
GouDMinCPengXWuHZhangLChenYet al. Associating factors of cognitive frailty among older people with chronic heart failure: based on LASSO-logistic regression. J Adv Nurs. (2024) 81(3):1399–411. 10.1111/jan.16352
6.
WangSBaiG-LWangZ-H. Comment on ‘associating factors of cognitive frailty among older people with chronic heart failure: based on LASSO-logistic regression’. J Adv Nurs. (2025) 81(12):8999–9000. 10.1111/jan.16825
7.
LiWLingHLuRHuangZSuW. Nomogram based on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol for the occurrence of preoperative deep vein thrombosis in patients with intertrochanteric femur fracture: a retrospective study. J Orthop Surg Res. (2024) 19(1):22. 10.1186/s13018-023-04497-8
8.
XiY-LLiBPuL-QMaTLuoX-P. Factors associated with the occurrence of postoperative infection of intertrochanteric fracture of the femur and its prediction model creation and validation. Medicine (Baltimore). (2025) 104(29):e43397. 10.1097/MD.0000000000043397
9.
DunlaySMGivertzMMAguilarDAllenLAChanMDesaiASet al. Type 2 diabetes Mellitus and heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the heart failure society of America: this statement does not represent an update of the 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA heart failure guideline update. Circulation. (2019) 140(7):e294–324. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000691
10.
WuZZhanSWangDTangC. A novel nomogram for predicting the risk of acute heart failure in intensive care unit patients with COPD. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. (2025) 12(2):117–26. 10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0562
11.
HuangXZhangW. Preoperative MRI-based tumor volume or tumor thickness for tongue cancer: which is more important?J Craniomaxillofac Surg. (2026) 54(9):104624. 10.1016/j.jcms.2026.104624
12.
PolatGBayramSGökçeoğluYSAlbayrakOKahramanADurmazH. The effect of bone morphology on fracture type and treatment result in patients with intertrochanteric femur fracture aged over 65 year. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. (2022) 28(12):1731–8. 10.14744/tjtes.2022.57400
13.
ÇukurluMKaragozBKeceliO. The effect of pre-fracture proximal femur geometry on hip fracture type in elderly patients. Medicine (Baltimore). (2023) 102(19):e33622. 10.1097/MD.0000000000033622
14.
Marco-MartínezJBernal-SobrinoJLFernández-PérezCElola-SomozaFJAzaña-GómezJGarcía-KlepizgJLet al. Impact of heart failure on in-hospital outcomes after surgical femoral neck fracture treatment. J Clin Med. (2021) 10(5):969. 10.3390/jcm10050969
15.
TianMLiWWangYTianYZhangKLiXet al. Risk factors for perioperative acute heart failure in older hip fracture patients and establishment of a nomogram predictive model. J Orthop Surg Res. (2023) 18(1):347. 10.1186/s13018-023-03825-2
16.
TamamuraYMatsuuraMShibaSNishikimiT. Effect of heart failure and malnutrition, alone and in combination, on rehabilitation effectiveness in patients with hip fracture. Clin Nutr ESPEN. (2021) 44:356–66. 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.05.014
17.
FuMZhangYGuoJZhaoYHouZWangZet al. Application of integrated management bundle incorporating with multidisciplinary measures improved in-hospital outcomes and early survival in geriatric hip fracture patients with perioperative heart failure: a retrospective cohort study. Aging Clin Exp Res. (2022) 34(5):1149–58. 10.1007/s40520-021-02038-z
18.
YuQFuMHouZWangZ. Developing a prediction model for preoperative acute heart failure in elderly hip fracture patients: a retrospective analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. (2024) 25(1):736. 10.1186/s12891-024-07843-x
19.
BuckmanSAForresterJDBessoffKEParliSEEvansHLHustonJM. Surgical infection society guidelines: 2022 updated guidelines for antibiotic use in open extremity fractures. Surg Infect (Larchmt). (2022) 23(9):817–28. 10.1089/sur.2022.206
20.
PengZWuJWangZXieHWangJZhangPet al. Incidence and related risk factors for postoperative delirium following revision total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective nationwide inpatient sample database study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. (2024) 25(1):633. 10.1186/s12891-024-07757-8
21.
YuQFuMWangZHouZ. Predictive characteristics and model development for acute heart failure preceding hip fracture surgery in elderly hypertensive patients: a retrospective machine learning approach. BMC Geriatr. (2024) 24(1):296. 10.1186/s12877-024-04892-8
22.
RiazMHRiazJMahmoodATariqMSaharNAliRSet al. Risk factors of postoperative acute heart failure in elderly patients after hip fracture surgery. Cureus. (2024) 16(4):e58967. 10.7759/cureus.58967
23.
ZhaoWFuMWangZHouZ. Risk factors and prognosis of perioperative acute heart failure in elderly patients with hip fracture: case-control studies and cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. (2024) 25(1):143. 10.1186/s12891-024-07255-x
Summary
Keywords
elderly, heart failure, influencing factors, intertrochanteric femoral fracture, nomogram, perioperative period
Citation
Su Q, Wang Y, Zhang Z and Tang H (2026) A nomogram prediction model for perioperative heart failure in elderly patients with intertrochanteric femoral fracture based on lasso-logistic regression. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 13:1814710. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2026.1814710
Received
21 February 2026
Revised
22 July 2026
Accepted
27 July 2026
Published
20 August 2026
Volume
13 - 2026
Edited by
Qinghe Meng, Upstate Medical University, United States
Reviewed by
Christian Bohringer, UC Davis Medical Center, United States
Ziyang Wu, Southeast University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Su, Wang, Zhang and Tang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Haibin Tang tanghb1999@outlook.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.