Abstract
The neural crest (NC) is a multipotent cell population in vertebrate embryos with extraordinary migratory capacity. The NC is crucial for vertebrate development and forms a myriad of cell derivatives throughout the body, including pigment cells, neuronal cells of the peripheral nervous system, cardiomyocytes and skeletogenic cells in craniofacial tissue. NC induction occurs at the end of gastrulation when the multipotent population of NC progenitors emerges in the ectodermal germ layer in the neural plate border region. In the process of NC fate specification, fate-specific markers are expressed in multipotent progenitors, which subsequently adopt a specific fate. Thus, NC cells delaminate from the neural plate border and migrate extensively throughout the embryo until they differentiate into various cell derivatives. Multiple signalling pathways regulate the processes of NC induction and specification. This review explores the ongoing role of the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway during NC development, focusing on research undertaken in the Teleost model organism, zebrafish (Danio rerio). We discuss the function of the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway in inducing the NC within the neural plate border and the specification of melanocytes from the NC. The current understanding of NC development suggests a continual role of Wnt/β-catenin signalling in activating and maintaining the gene regulatory network during NC induction and pigment cell specification. We relate this to emerging models and hypotheses on NC fate restriction. Finally, we highlight the ongoing challenges facing NC research, current gaps in knowledge, and this field’s potential future directions.
Introduction
The neural crest (NC) is a transient and multipotent embryonic cell population with extraordinary migratory capacity. The NC is crucial for vertebrate development and is an entire model system in its own right in developmental biology. NC cells (NCCs) give rise to many cell derivatives, including body pigment cells, neuronal cells of the peripheral nervous system, cardiomyocytes, and skeletogenic cells in craniofacial tissue (). Although recently an NC rudiment was identified in tunicates (), the NC is considered as an evolutionary novelty of vertebrates that facilitated the emergence of the specialised vertebrate cranium, including the hinged jaw, specialised neural structures and sensory organs (). This emergence of the NC population and the “new head” enabled vertebrates to acquire active feeding behaviours and contributed to the remarkable radiation of the vertebrate lineage ().
NC development begins during early embryogenesis, specifically during gastrulation, in the ectodermal germ layer and proceeds concurrently with neurulation (Figure 1). The NC is induced within a region of ectoderm located at the non-neural and neural ectoderm interface, known as the neural plate border (NPB). NCCs undergo epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in an anterior-posterior (AP) progression and migrate large distances across the embryo, during which they integrate a wide array of signals and execute a complex choreography of gene regulatory changes until their final cell fates at their final destinations in the body are determined. The timing of the specification of multipotent NCC progenitors towards their final cellular fate is only partially defined; for the better-studied melanocytes, it is thought to initiate prior to migration.
FIGURE 1
Developmental biologists have used various vertebrate model organisms to gain insight into the fundamental biology of the NC, including zebrafish, amphibians, chicks and mice. In the mid-20th century, the quail-chick chimaera system advanced NC research, uncovering specific migratory pathways and cell fates (). In these fundamental fate-mapping studies, homotopic and heterotopic transplantation of quail NCCs to chick embryos enabled the regional fate mapping of NCCs in vivo and established NC plasticity (). At the end of the 20th century, similar fate-mapping experiments were carried out in zebrafish by microinjecting fluorescent dyes and imaging by light and electron microscopy (Raible et al., 1992; Schilling and Kimmel, 1994). These studies demonstrated the extraordinary potency of the NC and revealed the conservation of NCC derivatives and migratory pathways in zebrafish and other vertebrates. Subsequently, one study extended these iontophoretic labelling investigations, confirming both the apparent fate-restriction of many NCCs and the small size of wild-type zebrafish NCC clones. It also characterised a partial failure of NC migration and fate specification in the zebrafish mutants of Sox10 transcription factor ().
The NC fate map demonstrated discrete populations of NCCs along the AP axis, which are conserved across the vertebrate models investigated. Cranial NC is the anterior-most NC population that emerges from the NPB, adjacent to the midbrain and hindbrain position of the developing embryo (). Cranial NC derivatives contribute to the craniofacial skeleton and gills, as well as neurons of the sensory and parasympathetic ganglia and pigment cells (Figure 1A) (; ; ; Schilling and Kimmel, 1994). Trunk NC cells are located more posteriorly, originating along the spinal cord, adjacent to the somites. Trunk NC forms neuronal and glial derivatives in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG), sympathetic and parasympathetic ganglia, and pigment cells (Figure 1A) (; Raible and Eisen, 1994; Raible et al., 1992). The cardiac/vagal NC domain is located between the trunk and cranial NC. This neural crest population spans from immediately rostral to the otic vesicle to caudal to somite 6 (Sato and Yost, 2003). The precise AP boundaries of the zebrafish cardiac/vagal NC domain remain to be fully defined. However, cells from this NC group are essential for zebrafish heart looping and contribute neurons and glia to the enteric nervous system (Figure 1A) (Shepherd et al., 2004; ; Olden et al., 2008). A recent study suggests that two distinct populations of cardiac/vagal NC migrate to the heart, with one population forming cardiomyocytes in the heart tube and the other migrating to the bulbus arteriosus (). Pigment cells are a ubiquitous feature of the NC and are not regionally localised. Paracrine signalling from surrounding cells is essential for the specification of these various NC derivatives; however, many aspects of this communication process and its implication in fate restriction is not well understood.
During vertebrate development, the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway acts as a long-range morphogen system providing concentration-dependent positional information in many tissues and organs. Moreover, many experimental observations from multiple model systems suggested that the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway is essential for the emergence of the NC. For example, in Xenopus animal cap explants, over-expression of Wnt ligands induces expression of NC markers, whereas expression of dominant-negative Wnts represses the expression of these markers (SaintJeannet et al., 1997; ; ; ; Tan et al., 2001; Villanueva et al., 2002). Similarly, in avian embryos, inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signalling blocks NC marker expression and the addition of Wnt to neural tube explants is sufficient to induce NC (). Furthermore, exogenous Wnt/β-catenin signalling can induce NC in human inducible pluripotent stem cells ().
There is also extensive evidence supporting the requirement of Wnt/β-catenin signalling after forming the NC during the selection of differentiation pathways, reversible fate specification followed by final, irreversible fate determination. For example, in mice, Wnt/β-catenin signalling promotes the specification of sensory neurons and melanocytes over alternative NC fates (; ). Furthermore, in zebrafish, activation of Wnt/β-catenin signalling in the pre-migratory NC promotes pigment cell types at the expense of neuronal cell fates (). These findings have led to the perception that the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway is required in two stages of NC development, firstly in NC induction and secondly in the specification of NC derivatives.
This review will primarily discuss NC induction and specification processes, with a focus on pigment cell determination. We will provide an extensive analysis of the role of the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway during these stages of NC development. We will highlight contributions from studies undertaken in the Teleost model organism, zebrafish, and compare and contrast these to findings from other vertebrate model systems. Although zebrafish was a relatively late arrival to NC research compared to other model organisms, we believe this model excels in studies of NC development, particularly in fate specification. Zebrafish is now established at the forefront of NC research due to the powerful genetic and transgenic tools available and transparent embryos that make ideal samples for high- and super-resolution imaging. Finally, we will discuss the potential future directions of Wnt/β-catenin signalling research in the context of the NC and anticipate the upcoming challenges of this field.
The Wnt/β-Catenin Signalling Pathway
Wnt proteins are secreted ligands that activate signalling pathways that regulate many developmental processes (; Nusse and Clevers, 2017). Wnt signalling controls pattern formation and cell behaviour through changes in gene expression and cell morphology. Wnt signal transduction pathways are classified as β-catenin dependent (also known as the canonical pathway) or β-catenin independent (the non-canonical pathways). The type of Wnt signalling pathway activated depends on the combination of Wnt ligands, receptors and co-receptors, and the cellular context (). There is significant variation in the number of Wnt genes between different species. For example, 19 Wnt genes have been identified in humans and mice, whereas zebrafish can have up to 25 Wnt genes due to the teleost-specific whole-genome duplication (; ; Ruzicka et al., 2019). There are also a variety of Wnt receptors and co-receptors. The seven-pass-membrane protein Frizzled is the predominant receptor of Wnt signalling pathways. Mammals have 10 Frizzled genes, and zebrafish are predicted to have at least 17 Frizzled genes (Nikaido et al., 2013; Ruzicka et al., 2019).
Wnt/β-catenin signalling is the best characterised Wnt signalling pathway implicated in NC development (Figure 2). Canonical Wnt ligands act as morphogens by establishing a gradient and influencing receiving-cell behaviour in a concentration-dependent manner. Wnt1, Wnt3a, and Wnt8a ligands predominantly activate Wnt/β-catenin signalling, ultimately stabilising the transcription factor β-catenin that translocates to the nucleus and activates target gene expression. In the absence of a Wnt/β-catenin ligand, Axin, APC, CK1, and Gsk3β form a destruction complex in the cytoplasm that phosphorylates β-catenin resulting in proteasomal degradation of this transcriptional co-factor (Figure 2A). The Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway is activated upon the Wnt ligand interacting with a Frizzled receptor and Lrp5/6 co-receptor. The intracellular scaffolding proteins Dishevelled (Dvl) and Axin are recruited to this membrane-tethered complex, where they interact with Frizzled and Lrp5/6, respectively. The subsequent recruitment of the destruction complex to the plasma membrane leads to its inactivation, and thus β-catenin can no longer be degraded. The stabilised β-catenin thus translocates to the nucleus, where it interacts with TCF/LEF co-transcription factors to activate Wnt target gene expression (Figure 2B).
FIGURE 2
Furthermore, there are negative regulators of the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway that inhibit transcription activation by β-catenin. There are secreted Wnt antagonists, including secreted Frizzled-related proteins (sFRPs) and Wnt inhibitory factors (WIF), which directly bind and sequester Wnt ligands (; ) (Figure 2A). Dickkopf1 (Dkk1) is another secreted Wnt inhibitor that interacts with the Lrp5/6 co-receptors, inhibiting the formation of the ligand/receptor/co-receptor complex required for pathway activation () (Figure 2A). Wnt/β-catenin signalling can also be manipulated experimentally using chemical inhibitors such as LiCl and Bromoindirubin-3′-oxime (BIO) (; ; Vibert et al., 2017). These chemical inhibitors target Gsk3β and prevent the phosphorylation and subsequent degradation of β-catenin, resulting in over-activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway (Figure 2A).
Wnt-mediated regulation of target gene expression is crucial during cell fate determination in development. During gastrulation, Wnt/β-catenin signalling is essential for the specification of posterior and ventral fates resulting from the expression of Wnt8a at the ventrolateral margin (; ) (Figures 3A,B). In the ectoderm, expression of Wnt8a is crucial for the specification of posterior neural fates, but also in the induction of the NC (; ). In NC development, TCF/LEF-regulated transcription plays a pivotal role in activating a gene regulatory network in the NC and subsequent NC fate restriction.
FIGURE 3
Neural Crest Induction
NC induction takes place during gastrulation in the NPB. The NPB is exposed to signals from surrounding tissues, including the neural and non-neural ectoderm, as well as the underlying mesoderm, which induce and maintain the expression of NC markers (Figure 3). The role of signals originating from the mesoderm in NC induction was previously discounted as disruption of mesoderm involution in zebrafish embryos did not affect NC induction (Ragland and Raible, 2004). However, Xenopus explant experiments that conjugated animal caps with mesoderm regions found that mesoderm from the dorsolateral marginal zone specifically induced NC marker expression (Steventon et al., 2009). This suggests that mesoderm acts as a signalling source to the NC, even when involution is disrupted during gastrulation. It is essential to recognise that the NC emerges alongside other cell lineages within the NPB. For example, in the anterior NPB, the cranial NC is adjacent to the pre-placodal ectoderm that forms sensory structures in the vertebrate head and the lateral line system in aquatic vertebrates (Theveneau et al., 2013) (Figures 3E,F). In anamniote vertebrates, such as fish and amphibians, the posterior NPB gives rise to trunk NC and a population of transient embryonic sensory neurons known as Rohon-Beard cells (; ).
Neural Crest Gene Regulatory Network
The induction of the NPB and NC involves the interplay of the Wnt/β-catenin signalling, Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP), and Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) pathways, which activate a complex network of transcription factors within the NC, known as the NC gene regulatory network (GRN) (Sauka-Spengler and Bronner-Fraser, 2008). The NC GRN in zebrafish has been structured as a hierarchy of transcription factors. Here we provide a brief overview of the zebrafish NC GRN; a more detailed analysis can be found in a recent review (Rocha et al., 2020).
A combination of extracellular signals activates the NC GRN. During gastrulation, the first group of transcription factors activated are coined “NPB specifiers”. At the end of gastrulation, the NC is specified within the NPB, a process characterised by the expression of further transcription factors, collectively referred to as “NC specifiers”. These NC specifiers are activated by the upstream NPB specifiers and from extracellular signalling inputs. The action of the NC specifiers, combined with extracellular signals, subsequently activates lineage-specific GRNs in the process of NC specification and subsequent fate commitment (see section on NC specification).
Wnt Signalling and the Neural Crest Gene Regulatory Network
Wnt/β-catenin signalling, as well as BMP and FGF signalling pathways, coordinate the activation of the NC GRN. A BMP morphogen gradient is established through the expression of BMPs in the ventral side of the embryo and BMP antagonists, Noggin, Chordin and Follistatin, from the dorsal side () (Figures 3C,E). This gradient patterns the ectoderm along the dorsoventral axis, with those cells that receive intermediate BMP levels forming the NC (; Tucker et al., 2008; Schumacher et al., 2011).
Wnt/β-catenin signalling plays a fundamental role during zebrafish NC induction. In zebrafish, this was elucidated using a conditional heatshock promotor that activates expression of a mutant version of the TCF co-transcription factor that cannot bind β-catenin and thus blocks target gene expression (Figure 2). Expression of this mutant TCF during gastrulation resulted in a loss of expression of the NC specifier gene foxd3 (). Interestingly, this approach did not affect the expression of markers of the neighbouring Rohon-Beard cells, suggesting a specific requirement of Wnt/β-catenin signalling in NC induction. In this study, Wnt8a was implicated in NC induction due to localised expression in the presumptive NC domain that overlapped with the expression of pax3 NPB specifier during gastrulation (Figures 3A,B). Furthermore, the Morpholino (MO)-based knockdown of Wnt8a resulted in the loss of expression of the NPB specifier pax3 and the NC specifiers sox10 and foxd3. MO oligomers were microinjected at the 1-cell stage of zebrafish development. Therefore, it is not clear whether changes in NC specifier expression domains in the MO knockdowns reflects a role of Wnt8a specifically during NC induction or a downstream effect resulting from defects in Wnt8a signalling in early embryo development (). However, TCF/LEF binding sites have been identified in the sox10 promoter, suggesting that this NC specifier is directly regulated by Wnt/β-catenin signalling ().
A further study on NC induction used a heat-shock promoter to overexpress the Wnt antagonist Dickkopf1 (Dkk1) that inhibits the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway by removing Lrp5/6 co-receptors from the plasma membrane () (Figure 2A). This study indicated that activation of Dkk1 expression at the end of gastrulation leads to a marked decrease in the expression of NPB markers pax3a and zic3 (). Through a series of elegant experiments, cis-regulatory elements of pax3a and zic3 were identified containing putative TCF/LEF binding sites. One enhancer of pax3a (IR1) contained six putative TCF/LEF binding sites, and mutating this enhancer reduced the expression of pax3a in the NPB. In addition, they identified two enhancers of zic3 (E1 and E2) that contain putative TCF/LEF binding sites and mutating E2 decreased expression of zic3 in the NPB ().
Overall, findings from these studies indicate a crucial role for Wnt/β-catenin signalling in establishing the NPB during gastrulation (by activating expression of pax3a and zic3) and NC induction (by activating expression of foxd3 and sox10). These studies used heat-shock inducible constructs to inhibit different components of the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway at discrete developmental stages. Notably, both studies identified changes in gene expression of NPB specifiers and NC specifiers upon inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signalling. This is likely to reflect an ongoing role of Wnt/β-catenin signalling during gastrulation to specify the NPB and subsequently induce the NC within the NPB.
Although only a few genes were identified in the zebrafish NPB and NC directly regulated by Wnt/β-catenin signalling, there are likely to be many other NPB and NC specifiers regulated by Wnt/β-catenin signalling. A recent study in chick embryos examined the nuclear architecture of the cells expressing the pan-NC marker Pax7 using chromatin conformation capture. Strikingly, a map of active enhancers in NCCs during induction stages shows that the most highly enriched motif in their enhancer map were TCF/LEF-binding sites (). This analysis led the authors to rethink the NC GRN and proposed that the GRN has a hub-and-spoke architecture whereby Wnt/β-catenin signalling is connected to multiple components through these signal-responsive regulatory elements (). Further in-depth analysis of cis-regulatory elements of a direct Wnt target gene in the NC revealed an intricate regulatory system with inputs from multiple upstream signalling pathways and positive and repressive elements that, as a combination, finely tune the expression of NC specifier genes (, ). Therefore, it is probable that Wnt/β-catenin signalling has a role both in the initial activation of the GRN and subsequently in maintaining and fine-tuning expression of intrinsic factors through regulation of both positive and negative gene regulatory elements.
Dickkopf Proteins in Neural Crest Induction
The activation of the NC GRN by the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway is also regulated by the activity of its antagonists. One member of the Dkk family of secreted Wnt antagonists, Dkk1, was characterised as a potent inhibitor of Wnt/β-catenin signalling from studies in Xenopus and mouse embryos (Figure 2). Overexpression of Dkk1 resulted in anteriorized embryos due to increased inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signalling that induces posterior neural fates (; ). Dkk1 is expressed in the anterior prechordal mesoderm, where it functions to promote anterior neural fates in the neural ectoderm as well as modulating Wnt/β-catenin signalling in the NPB during NC induction (; ; ). Consistent with its function as an inhibitor of the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway, loss-of-function of Dkk1 in Xenopus and mouse embryos resulted in ectopic expression of NPB specifiers and NC specifiers in the anterior neural fold. Therefore, expression of this Wnt/β-catenin signalling antagonist inhibits NC induction and specification in the anterior ectoderm ().
Despite the well-documented activity of Dkk1 as a negative regulator of Wnt/β-catenin signalling, studies on the role of Dkk2 suggest that this secreted factor can positively and negatively regulate Wnt/β-catenin signalling in a context-dependent manner. In Xenopus embryos, Dkk2 overexpression phenotypes are characterised by microcephaly, similar to phenotypes of embryos with ectopic expression of Wnt8 (Wu et al., 2000). In a study of the role of Dkk2 in NC development, MO-knockdown in Xenopus embryos resulted in reduced expression of NC specifiers, but not NPB specifiers or mesodermal genes. This suggests that Dkk2 functions during NC induction to exclusively promote the expression of NC specifiers (). Furthermore, in animal caps exposed to Wnt8 and BMP antagonist (Noggin) to induce NC, knockdown of Dkk2 resulted in depletion of NC specifiers. This is indicative of a requirement for Dkk2 in Wnt/β-catenin signal transduction during NC induction. Consistent with these findings, Dkk2 is expressed in the posterior of the embryo, unlike Dkk1. Furthermore, rescue of NC specifier expression in Dkk2 knockdown embryos was tested using the Gsk3β chemical inhibitor, BIO, to stimulate Wnt/β-catenin signalling (Figure 2A). Intriguingly, they found that this stimulation of Wnt/β-catenin signalling did not restore normal expression levels of the NC specifier sox10. The authors, therefore, speculate that Dkk2 functions to positively regulate Wnt/β-catenin signalling independently of Gsk3β (). An alternative mechanism by which Dkk2 promotes β-catenin-dependent gene transcription in the NC has not yet been identified.
Further Levels of Wnt/β-Catenin Signalling and NC Induction
It is essential to recognise that the NC is exposed to many extracellular signalling inputs during induction stages. However, it seems that many are involved in regulating directly or indirectly the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway. Studies on a DEAD/H-box RNA helicase, DDX3, in Xenopus provided insight into the interplay of signalling pathways in the NC. In the first study on DDX3 function, this RNA helicase was shown to activate Wnt/β-catenin signalling by stimulating CK1 phosphorylation of Dvl, resulting in increased formation of Wnt signalosomes and increased expression of downstream genes (). More recently, an in-depth study of DDX3 in Xenopus NC development demonstrated that activation of this RNA helicase stabilises β-catenin, activating the expression of NPB and NC specifiers. Rather than directly modulating elements of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, the authors found that DDX3 regulates the serine/threonine kinase, AKT, in an RNA helicase-dependent manner. In the NC, DDX3 RNA helicase activity stimulates AKT, which phosphorylates and inhibits Gsk3β, resulting in the accumulation of β-catenin (Perfetto et al., 2021). AKT is also regulated upstream by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) implicated in NC induction (). Therefore, there is evidence of an interplay between the PI3K-AKT and Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathways, which has downstream effects on the NC GRN. Furthermore, there is evidence of an interplay between BMP and Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathways reported in Xenopus. Mesodermal expression of wnt8 is dependent on BMP signalling (). More recently, BMP responsive elements were identified upstream of the transcriptional start site of wnt8. The transcriptional activator of the BMP signalling pathway, Smad1, was able to bind these cis-regulatory elements in the presence of a scaffold protein, Fhl3 (). A further interaction has been reported on the level of the secreted BMP antagonist Gremlin (Pegge et al., 2020), which interacts with heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), a family of cell surface macromolecules that regulate Wnt distribution and signalling (reviewed in Routledge and Scholpp, 2019). This coordination of multiple signalling pathways is often overlooked in NC studies which focus on the function of signalling pathways separately. These studies provide evidence of other signalling pathways that modulate Wnt/β-catenin signalling during NC induction.
Given the precise requirement of Wnt/β-catenin signalling during NC induction, it is not surprising that several studies have implicated specific Wnt/β-catenin ligands in the process. Wnt8a was implicated in NPB specification and NC induction through Morpholino-based knockdown studies (; ). However, further Wnt/β-catenin ligands originating from the neural ectoderm have been implicated in NC induction. In mice, Wnt1, Wnt3 and Wnt3a are expressed in the dorsal roof plate of the neural tube during the stages of NC induction (Parr et al., 1993). Furthermore, mouse Wnt1 and Wnt3a double mutants displayed defects in NC formation, consistent with the role of Wnt/β-catenin signalling in NC induction (). Similarly, zebrafish Wnt1 and Wnt3a are expressed in the dorsal neural keel adjacent to the NPB () (Figure 4). Wnt3 is also expressed in the zebrafish dorsal roof plate; however, whether Wnt3 has a functional role in NC development has not yet been explored (Teh et al., 2015). Strikingly, it was demonstrated that the murine mutants of Wnt1 and Wnt3a not only displayed a reduction in the size of NC clones, which would be indicative of a function in NC induction, but they also altered the balance of NCC derivatives. This led to the perception that Wnt/β-catenin signalling has a continued role in NC development following NC induction ().
FIGURE 4
NC Fate Specification
Analysis of the role of Wnt1 and Wnt3a signalling in mouse and zebrafish NC shows that fates of NCCs are biased by Wnt/β-catenin signalling (; ). In a study of cranial NC, fluorescein-dextran cell labelling suggested that NCCs located ventrolaterally furthest away from the origin of Wnt/β-catenin signals in the neural keel are destined to become neuronal cells () (Figure 4). On the other hand, NCCs that form pigment cell derivatives are located in the medial domain of the NC, adjacent to the source of Wnt1 and Wnt3a ligands in the neural keel (Schilling and Kimmel, 1994) (Figure 4). Furthermore, overexpression of β-catenin in NCCs in the lateral domain resulted in pigment cell generation instead of neuronal cells. Conversely, injection of a dominant-negative Wnt1 or a mutated form of TCF3 into medial NCCs generated neuronal cell types instead of pigment cells (). These early experiments established the long-standing model whereby NCCs receiving a high level of Wnt/β-catenin signalling are biased towards pigment cell fates.
In contrast, NCCs that receive low levels of Wnt form neuronal cell derivatives. These findings demonstrate a requirement for Wnt/β-catenin signalling in the specification of NC pigment cell derivatives over neuronal derivatives. How can NCCs acquire different fates if all of them originate from one cell population adjacent to the same signalling source, the Wnt1/Wnt3a+ roof plate? There are two hypotheses explaining this paradox. The NCCs specified to neuronal lineages could delaminate and migrate away from the dorsal neural tube earlier than NCCs specified as melanocytes. Such a temporal difference in migration of NC derivatives could result in different periods of exposure to Wnt ligands, with melanophores exposed to Wnt for a longer duration than neuronal cells (Figure 4) (; Nitzan et al., 2013). Indeed, the transition from pre-migratory to migratory NCCs is facilitated by Cadherin2 (; Scarpa et al., 2015). By blocking Cadherin2 function, pre-migratory NCCs accumulate at the dorsal midline, adjacent to the Wnt1/Wnt3a+ roof plate (Figure 4) and start to express the pigment cell marker microphthalmia-associated transcription factor a (mitfa) (Piloto and Schilling, 2010; Tuttle et al., 2014). However, employing a high-resolution method of detecting RNA transcripts in whole-mount embryos suggested that these NCCs may not be fate-restricted to the pigment cell lineage at this stage (Tatarakis et al., 2020). Therefore, despite the long-standing model of NC fate specification whereby Wnt1/Wnt3a ligands originating in the dorsal neural tube promote pigment cell fates over neuronal cell fates, the underlying mechanisms of the Wnt morphogen gradient and the timing of specification is not fully understood.
Wnt/β-Catenin Signalling and Pigment Cell (Chromatophore) Specification
The specification of the pigment cell lineages of the NC has been extensively studied due to their distinctive colour and morphology that enables easy identification of mutants in genetic screens (; ). Mammals only have one type of pigment cell, melanocytes, whereas zebrafish have three types; melanocytes, xanthophores and iridophores (; Rawls et al., 2001; Schartl et al., 2016). Of these three cell derivatives, the GRN that specifies the melanocyte cell lineage has been best characterised. The NC transcription factor sox10 is required to specify all three pigment cell derivatives (; ). Sox10 transcription factor is an NC specifier, which is first expressed in pre-migratory NCCs. sox10 (also known as colourless) mutants have defects in all NC derivatives except for ectomesenchymal lineages (; ). A similar phenotype was also shown in sox10 mutant mice (). sox10 expression is transiently maintained in NCCs during migration before being switched off in all lineages apart from iridophores and glia (). It has been suggested that sox10 functions in the fate specification of NC derivatives from multipotent progenitors, e.g., sensory neurons ().
In melanocyte specification, Sox10 works in conjunction with Wnt/β-catenin signalling to activate and maintain the expression of the melanocyte master regulator, mitfa (; Opdecamp et al., 1997; ; ; Vibert et al., 2017). Interactions between SOX family transcription factors and Wnt/β-catenin signalling have been widely reported in many systems (). Recently a study using human pluripotent stem cells showed that two SOX factors, SOX2 and SOX17, directly bind β-catenin and this protein-protein interaction results in the recruitment of β-catenin to lineage-specific regulatory elements in both the presence and absence of TCF/LEF (). These findings lead us to speculate on potential interactions between Sox10 and β-catenin in NCCs, which could mediate a lineage-specific Wnt-responsive transcriptional program.
Similarly to pax3a and zic3, mitfa has cis-regulatory elements that contain LEF-binding sites enabling regulation of mitfa expression by Wnt/β-catenin signalling, and a different regulatory element containing Sox10-binding sites (; ; Takeda et al., 2000; ; ; ). mitfa expression is required for the process of melanogenesis and melanocyte cell survival and proliferation (). However, it has been shown that mitfa is transiently expressed in all NCCs even though only a subpopulation of NCCs form melanocytes (). Therefore, maintaining mitfa expression is crucial for establishing the melanocyte cell lineage (Nikaido et al., 2021).
Experiments with BIO, the chemical inhibitor of Gsk3β, helped further unravel the link between Wnt/β-catenin signalling and melanocyte specification (Vibert et al., 2017). Incubation with this compound stabilises β-catenin to activate Wnt/β-catenin dependent gene expression (Figure 2A). Indeed, zebrafish embryos incubated in BIO at 15–30 hours post-fertilisation (hpf) increased melanocyte specification due to enhanced Wnt/β-catenin signalling. On the other hand, BIO treatment at 24–72 hpf, when sox10 expression is no longer detected in melanocytes, showed no changes in melanocyte number. However, the melanocyte morphology was affected (Vibert et al., 2017). Therefore, a two-stage model was proposed: At 15–30 hpf, Sox10-mediated melanocyte specification needs Wnt/β-catenin signalling, and at 24–72 hpf, the maintenance of melanocytes requires Wnt/β-catenin signalling together with mitfa expression.
One evident bottleneck in our understanding of the specification of these pigment cell lineages is the lack of identification of the Frizzled receptors involved in melanocyte specification. Characterising expression patterns and performing Morpholino-mediated knockdowns of numerous Frizzled genes was used to assess Frizzled receptors as candidates for NC development and pigment cell specification in zebrafish (Nikaido et al., 2013). This analysis, however, proved ineffective; none of the assessed Frizzled receptors was expressed in NCCs or melanocytes, and no pigment cell defects were detected in the knockdowns explored (Nikaido et al., 2013). Thus, the possibility remains that other Frizzled members, not included in the study, may be required in the NC. In addition, other higher-resolution methods to detect expression localisation, such as Nanostring, could provide insight into this elusive receptor repertoire of NCCs (Petratou et al., 2018). Alternatively, it has been suggested that Wnt co-receptors can signal without the need for Frizzled receptors ().
Models of NC Specification
The mechanisms regulating NC specification, whereby NCCs are fate-restricted to individual cell types, remain controversial. NC fate decisions are imposed by environmental signalling cues, and it was assumed that this results in fully multipotent NCCs becoming determined as unipotent cells of specific fates. Two explanatory models were proposed in the late 20th century. The direct fate restriction (DFR) model was proposed based on single-cell labelling studies in the chick dorsal neural tube and envisaged fully multipotent NCCs as directly adopting single fates; this model was supported by work using rat NC stem cells that identified key extracellular signals that instruct NCCs to adopt an individual fate from multiple options (; ; ; Stemple and Anderson, 1992).
The second model, and nowadays the prevailing one, has been the progressive fate restriction (PFR) hypothesis. The PFR hypothesis proposes that multipotent NC progenitor fates adopt specific fates through a series of partially restricted intermediate progenitors, each with limited but distinct potencies (Sieber-Blum and Cohen, 1980; Weston, 1991; ). Single-cell profiling of mouse NC has supported this model by tracking pre-migratory NCCs through successive fate restrictions towards neural and ectomesenchymal fates (Soldatov et al., 2019). Similarly, single-cell RNA analysis of NC-derived cells taken from various stages of embryonic, larval, juvenile and adult fish have each identified putative pigment cell progenitors (; ; Saunders et al., 2021), although in each case the markers used to identify these progenitors does not include all the genetically best-characterised genes with known functional roles in pigment cell fate choice so that the exact identities of these cells and the relationship between the cells described in each study merits further detailed investigation. Thus, the PFR hypothesis has become dominant over the alternative DFR model.
However, a direct test of the PFR model for zebrafish pigment cell development, using sensitive NanoString single-cell profiling of NCCs throughout embryonic development, unexpectedly failed to identify the predicted tripotent (chromatoblasts) and bipotent (melanoiridoblast) progenitors (Nikaido et al., 2021). Furthermore, the same study revealed broad potency, for pigment and neural fates, for early NCCs expressing leukocyte tyrosine kinase, ltk, previously hypothesised to be a chromatoblast marker. The authors proposed an alternative model of NC fate restriction, known as the cyclical fate restriction (CFR) hypothesis, which proposes a more dynamic view of NC specification than either the PFR or DFR models. In the PFR model, the transition from one progenitor state to another of more restricted potency (e.g., from chromatoblast to melanoiridoblast) is associated with loss of potential for one or more fates. In contrast, the CFR hypothesis proposes that NC-derived Highly Multipotent Progenitors cycle through different sub-states, each primed towards a particular cell fate; however, because these cells cycle through sub-states primed for all fates, in turn, they retain multipotency, even although in a “snap-shot” view they appear fate-specified. It is proposed that the priming is reflected in fluctuating expression levels of fate-specification receptors and key fate-specific transcription factors such as Mitfa. The CFR hypothesis suggests that adopting a specific fate occurs when the primed sub-state is exposed to sufficient levels and duration of the fate-specification ligand, driving the differentiation of a specific fate (). Although the CFR hypothesis is, at this point, somewhat speculative, it is supported by several observations and by theoretical modelling studies (Farjami et al., 2021). For example, the ltk, encoding a receptor tyrosine kinase, is crucial for iridophore specification but shows heterogeneous expression in premigratory NCCs (). The CFR model also helps to explain recent observations of a group of NC progenitors that simultaneously express factors involved in the specification of all pigment cell lineages – ltk and tfec (iridophores (; Petratou et al., 2021), mitfa (melanocytes ()) and pax7 (xanthophores ()), but also factors crucial for neural fate specification (Nikaido et al., 2021). One important, but underappreciated, implication of all of these observations is that fate restriction to a specific fate depends as much on the repression of fate-specific transcription factors and receptors specifying other fates, as well as the upregulation and maintenance of those for the selected fate (Petratou et al., 2018). Thus, the upregulation of Ltk and Tfec, as well as downregulation of, for example, a Frizzled receptor and Mitfa, all in response to exposure to ALKALs (ligands of Ltk) would result in an iridophore fate. In contrast, upregulation of Frizzled and Mitfa, following exposure to Wnt/β-catenin ligands and downregulation of Ltk and Tfec (and others) would drive the cell towards a melanocyte fate (). It is conceivable that Wnt signalling plays a key role in the entry and exit from the NC-HMP cycling progenitor state and may act alongside other signals to initiate entry into the cycling state and to allow differentiation of each derivative fate from the cells in the cycling state (Farjami et al., 2021). The CFR model shares similarities with the so-called “phase-stage model”, which has been proposed for embryonic stem (ES) cell fate restrictions following the observation that an ES cell can occupy a state, known as the phase stage when it can “explore” several potential states (distinguished by oscillating levels of Nanog; ) over time (). In conclusion, the CFR offers a novel and dynamic framework explaining the previous data supporting either the DFR or the PFR model. Distinguishing these models will require sensitive assessment of the broadest range of markers of each cell-fate, especially those known to drive fate decisions, and development of tools for highly sensitive detection of the dynamic expression of transcription factors and fate-specification receptors in living embryos.
Concluding Remarks and Future Perspectives
The vertebrate novelty of the NC continues to fascinate the scientific community. NC research has benefitted from applying multidisciplinary techniques, from the cell lineage tracing experiments pioneered by Nicole Le Douarin to the single-cell sequencing technologies that continue to uncover the NC GRN. In this review, we have discussed the current knowledge of the role of Wnt/β-catenin signalling in NC induction and specification. It is well-established that β-catenin-dependent Wnt signalling is required for NC induction and specification, particularly during pigment cell specification. Although some canonical Wnt ligand candidates have been implicated in NC development, there remains a significant lack of understanding of the mechanism of Wnt ligand transport during NC development. Localising these ligands and clarifying their mechanisms of transport would allow refinement of our knowledge of when and how Wnt/β-catenin signalling influences NC development at each of the stages outlined above.
Wnt morphogens are hydrophobic due to post-translational modification with lipid moieties during intracellular trafficking (Willert et al., 2003; Takada et al., 2006). It is, therefore, improbable that Wnt ligands are secreted by cells and diffuse freely through extracellular space (reviewed in Routledge and Scholpp, 2019). As a result, several alternative mechanisms of long-range Wnt transport have been explored, including specialised signalling filopodia, known as cytonemes (Stanganello et al., 2015; ). Although there is strong evidence for canonical Wnt expression in the dorsal roof plate of the zebrafish neural tube during NC induction and specification stages, there is no published research on the ligand transport mechanisms regulating this process. Therefore, high-resolution imaging could be utilised to visualise the mechanism of Wnt transport during NC development. Zebrafish is the ideal model organism for this research, given the powerful transgenic tools and superb in vivo imaging due to the embryos’ transparency.
Furthermore, studying the function of the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway during NC development has proven challenging due to its necessity during early embryonic development, in gastrulation for AP patterning, and neural plate patterning. In this review, we have highlighted studies in which authors have provided temporal control to the modulation of the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway, for example, using the heat-shock promoter or incubation of chemical inhibitors at different developmental stages (; ; Vibert et al., 2017). However, studies have also relied on whole organism knockouts and MO-based knockdowns to study the impact of specific Wnt ligand candidates on NC development. Such a strategy is not ideal as Wnt/β-catenin signalling is vital in the early embryo and successive stages of NC development. Therefore, it is unclear whether the phenotypes observed in the NC result from inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signalling during NC stages of development or whether researchers observe downstream effects from inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signalling earlier in development. As an alternative, we propose using conditional gene knockouts that can be spatially and temporally controlled in the developing embryo. Such a strategy could enable the knockout of essential components of the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway only in NCCs during NC induction or specification stages. Indeed, conditional knockout lines using CRISPR/Cas9 technology are appearing in the literature. For example, the Cre/LoxP system has been introduced to control the expression of Cas9 and gRNAs in zebrafish (). Further research will be required to compare the relative efficiency and specificity of this novel conditional knockout system. However, it is undeniable that these new knockout strategies will be invaluable to the future of NC research.
Statements
Author contributions
GS drafted the manuscript and designed the figures. SS and RK contributed to drafting the manuscript, revised and polished the manuscript. All authors approved the final version.
Funding
Research in the SS lab is supported by the BBSRC (Research Grant, BB/S016295/1 and an Equipment grant, BB/R013764/1) and the Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter. In addition, GS is funded by a BBSRC DTP SWBio studentship.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AbituaP. B.WagnerE.NavarreteI. A.LevineM. (2012). Identification of a Rudimentary Neural Crest in a Non-vertebrate Chordate. Nature492, 104–107. 10.1038/nature11589
2
AhsanK.SinghN.RochaM.HuangC.PrinceV. E. (2019). Prickle1 Is Required for EMT and Migration of Zebrafish Cranial Neural Crest. Develop. Biol.448, 16–35. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.01.018
3
AlexanderC.PilotoS.Le PabicP.SchillingT. F. (2014). Wnt Signaling Interacts with Bmp and Edn1 to Regulate Dorsal-Ventral Patterning and Growth of the Craniofacial Skeleton. Plos Genet.10, e1004479. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004479
4
AlkobtawiM.PlaP.Monsoro-BurqA. H. (2021). BMP Signaling Is Enhanced Intracellularly by FHL3 Controlling WNT-dependent Spatiotemporal Emergence of the Neural Crest. Cel Rep.35, 109289. 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109289
5
AnM.LuoR.HenionP. D. (2002). Differentiation and Maturation of Zebrafish Dorsal Root and Sympathetic Ganglion Neurons. J. Comp. Neurol.446, 267–275. 10.1002/cne.10214
6
AngersS.MoonR. T. (2009). Proximal Events in Wnt Signal Transduction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cel Biol10, 468–477. 10.1038/nrm2717
7
ArtingerK. B.Bronner-FraserM. (1992). Partial Restriction in the Developmental Potential of Late Emigrating Avian Neural Crest Cells. Develop. Biol.149, 149–157. 10.1016/0012-1606(92)90271-h
8
AzambujaA. P.Simoes-CostaM. (2021b). A Regulatory Sub-circuit Downstream of Wnt Signaling Controls Developmental Transitions in Neural Crest Formation. Plos Genet.17, e1009296. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009296
9
AzambujaA. P.Simoes-CostaM. (2021a). The Connectome of Neural Crest Enhancers Reveals Regulatory Features of Signaling Systems. Develop. Cel56, 1268e1266–1282. 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.03.024
10
BaficoA.LiuG.YanivA.GazitA.AaronsonS. A. (2001). Novel Mechanism of Wnt Signalling Inhibition Mediated by Dickkopf-1 Interaction with LRP6/Arrow. Nat. Cel Biol3, 683–686. 10.1038/35083081
11
BangA. G.PapalopuluN.GouldingM. D.KintnerC. (1999). Expression of Pax-3 in the Lateral Neural Plate Is Dependent on a Wnt-Mediated Signal from Posterior Nonaxial Mesoderm. Develop. Biol.212, 366–380. 10.1006/dbio.1999.9319
12
BrinkmannE.-M.MattesB.KumarR.HagemannA. I. H.GradlD.ScholppS.et al (2016). Secreted Frizzled-Related Protein 2 (sFRP2) Redirects Non-canonical Wnt Signaling from Fz7 to Ror2 during Vertebrate Gastrulation. J. Biol. Chem.291, 13730–13742. 10.1074/jbc.m116.733766
13
Bronner-FraserM.FraserS. (1989). Developmental Potential of Avian Trunk Neural Crest Cells In Situ. Neuron3, 755–766. 10.1016/0896-6273(89)90244-4
14
Bronner-FraserM.FraserS. E. (1988). Cell Lineage Analysis Reveals Multipotency of Some Avian Neural Crest Cells. Nature335, 161–164. 10.1038/335161a0
15
BruntL.GreiciusG.RogersS.EvansB. D.VirshupD. M.WedgwoodK. C. A.et al (2021). Vangl2 Promotes the Formation of Long Cytonemes to Enable Distant Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling. Nat. Commun.12, 2058. 10.1038/s41467-021-22393-9
16
CalloniG. W.Le DouarinN. M.DupinE. (2009). High Frequency of Cephalic Neural Crest Cells Shows Coexistence of Neurogenic, Melanogenic, and Osteogenic Differentiation Capacities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.106, 8947–8952. 10.1073/pnas.0903780106
17
CaneparoL.HuangY.-L.StaudtN.TadaM.AhrendtR.KazanskayaO.et al (2007). Dickkopf-1 Regulates Gastrulation Movements by Coordinated Modulation of Wnt/βcatenin and Wnt/PCP Activities, through Interaction with the Dally-like Homolog Knypek. Genes Dev.21, 465–480. 10.1101/gad.406007
18
Carmona-FontaineC.AcuñaG.EllwangerK.NiehrsC.MayorR. (2007). Neural Crests Are Actively Precluded from the Anterior Neural Fold by a Novel Inhibitory Mechanism Dependent on Dickkopf1 Secreted by the Prechordal Mesoderm. Develop. Biol.309, 208–221. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.07.006
19
CarneyT. J.DuttonK. A.GreenhillE.Delfino-MachínM.DufourcqP.BladerP.et al (2006). A Direct Role for Sox10 in Specification of Neural Crest-Derived Sensory Neurons. Development133, 4619–4630. 10.1242/dev.02668
20
CavanaughA. M.HuangJ.ChenJ.-N. (2015). Two Developmentally Distinct Populations of Neural Crest Cells Contribute to the Zebrafish Heart. Develop. Biol.404, 103–112. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.06.002
21
ChangC.Hemmati-BrivanlouA. (1998). Neural Crest Induction by Xwnt7B in Xenopus. Develop. Biol.194, 129–134. 10.1006/dbio.1997.8820
22
CiarloC.KaufmanC. K.KinikogluB.MichaelJ.YangS.D AmatoC.et al (2017). A Chemical Screen in Zebrafish Embryonic Cells Establishes that Akt Activation Is Required for Neural Crest Development. Elife6. 10.7554/eLife.29145
23
CornellR. A.EisenJ. S. (2000). Delta Signaling Mediates Segregation of Neural Crest and Spinal Sensory Neurons from Zebrafish Lateral Neural Plate. Development127, 2873–2882. 10.1242/dev.127.13.2873
24
CruciatC.-M.DoldeC.de GrootR. E. A.OhkawaraB.ReinhardC.KorswagenH. C.et al (2013). RNA Helicase DDX3 Is a Regulatory Subunit of Casein Kinase 1 in Wnt-β-Catenin Signaling. Science339, 1436–1441. 10.1126/science.1231499
25
CurranK.ListerJ. A.KunkelG. R.PrendergastA.ParichyD. M.RaibleD. W. (2010). Interplay between Foxd3 and Mitf Regulates Cell Fate Plasticity in the Zebrafish Neural Crest. Develop. Biol.344, 107–118. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.04.023
26
DevottaA.HongC. S.Saint-JeannetJ. P. (2018). Dkk2 Promotes Neural Crest Specification by Activating Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling in a GSK3β Independent Manner. eLife7, e34404. 10.7554/eLife.34404
27
DorskyR. I.MoonR. T.RaibleD. W. (1998). Control of Neural Crest Cell Fate by the Wnt Signalling Pathway. Nature396, 370–373. 10.1038/24620
28
DorskyR. I.RaibleD. W.MoonR. T. (2000). Direct Regulation of Nacre, a Zebrafish MITF Homolog Required for Pigment Cell Formation, by the Wnt Pathway. Genes Dev.14, 158–162. 10.1101/gad.14.2.158
29
DorskyR. I.SheldahlL. C.MoonR. T. (2002). A Transgenic Lef1/β-catenin-dependent Reporter Is Expressed in Spatially Restricted Domains throughout Zebrafish Development. Develop. Biol.241, 229–237. 10.1006/dbio.2001.0515
30
DuncanR. N.PanahiS.PiotrowskiT.DorskyR. I. (2015). Identification of Wnt Genes Expressed in Neural Progenitor Zones during Zebrafish Brain Development. PLoS One10, e0145810. 10.1371/journal.pone.0145810
31
DuttonJ. R.AntonellisA.CarneyT. J.RodriguesF. S.PavanW. J.WardA.et al (2008). An Evolutionarily Conserved Intronic Region Controls the Spatiotemporal Expression of the Transcription Factor Sox10. BMC Dev. Biol.8, 105. 10.1186/1471-213x-8-105
32
DuttonK. A.PaulinyA.LopesS. S.ElworthyS.CarneyT. J.RauchJ.et al (2001). Zebrafishcolourlessencodessox10and Specifies Non-ectomesenchymal Neural Crest Fates. Development128, 4113–4125. 10.1242/dev.128.21.4113
33
ElworthyS.ListerJ. A.CarneyT. J.RaibleD. W.KelshR. N. (2003). Transcriptional Regulation of Mitfa Accounts for the Sox10 Requirement in Zebrafish Melanophore Development. Development130, 2809–2818. 10.1242/dev.00461
34
ElworthyS.PintoJ. P.PettiferA.CancelaM. L.KelshR. N. (2005). Phox2b Function in the Enteric Nervous System Is Conserved in Zebrafish and Is Sox10-dependent. Mech. Develop.122, 659–669. 10.1016/j.mod.2004.12.008
35
ErterC. E.WilmT. P.BaslerN.WrightC. V. E.Solnica-KrezelL. (2001). Wnt8 Is Required in Lateral Mesendodermal Precursors for Neural Posteriorization In Vivo. Development128, 3571–3583. 10.1242/dev.128.18.3571
36
FraserS. E.Bronner-FraserM. (1991). Migrating Neural Crest Cells in the Trunk of the Avian Embryo Are Multipotent. Development112, 913–920. 10.1242/dev.112.4.913
37
FujiiR. (1993). Cytophysiology of Fish Chromatophores. Int. Rev. Cytol.143, 191–255. 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61876-8
38
GansC.NorthcuttR. G. (1983). Neural Crest and the Origin of Vertebrates: a New Head. Science220, 268–273. 10.1126/science.220.4594.268
39
García-CastroM. I.MarcelleC.Bronner-FraserM. (2002). Ectodermal Wnt Function as a Neural Crest Inducer. Science297, 848–851. 10.1126/science.1070824
40
Garcia-OjalvoJ.Martinez AriasA. (2012). Towards a Statistical Mechanics of Cell Fate Decisions. Curr. Opin. Genet. Develop.22, 619–626. 10.1016/j.gde.2012.10.004
41
GarnettA. T.SquareT. A.MedeirosD. M. (2012). BMP, Wnt and FGF Signals Are Integrated through Evolutionarily Conserved Enhancers to Achieve Robust Expression of Pax3 and Zic Genes at the Zebrafish Neural Plate Border. Development139, 4220–4231. 10.1242/dev.081497
42
GlinkaA.WuW.DeliusH.MonaghanA. P.BlumenstockC.NiehrsC. (1998). Dickkopf-1 Is a Member of a New Family of Secreted Proteins and Functions in Head Induction. Nature391, 357–362. 10.1038/34848
43
GomezG. A.PrasadM. S.SandhuN.ShelarP. B.LeungA. W.García-CastroM. I. (2019). Human Neural Crest Induction by Temporal Modulation of WNT Activation. Develop. Biol.449, 99–106. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.02.015
44
HallB. K. (2000). The Neural Crest as a Fourth Germ Layer and Vertebrates as Quadroblastic Not Triploblastic. Evol. Dev.2, 3–5. 10.1046/j.1525-142x.2000.00032.x
45
HammerschmidtM.SerbedzijaG. N.McMahonA. P. (1996). Genetic Analysis of Dorsoventral Pattern Formation in the Zebrafish: Requirement of a BMP-like Ventralizing Activity and its Dorsal Repressor. Genes Dev.10, 2452–2461. 10.1101/gad.10.19.2452
46
HansS.ZöllerD.HammerJ.StuckeJ.SpiessS.KesavanG.et al (2021). Cre-Controlled CRISPR Mutagenesis Provides Fast and Easy Conditional Gene Inactivation in Zebrafish. Nat. Commun.12, 1125. 10.1038/s41467-021-21427-6
47
HariL.BraultV.KléberM.LeeH.-Y.IlleF.LeimerothR.et al (2002). Lineage-specific Requirements of β-catenin in Neural Crest Development. J. Cel Biol.159, 867–880. 10.1083/jcb.200209039
48
HeX.SemenovM.TamaiK.ZengX. (2004). LDL Receptor-Related Proteins 5 and 6 in Wnt/β-Catenin signaling:Arrows point the Way. Development131, 1663–1677. 10.1242/dev.01117
49
HenionP. D.WestonJ. A. (1997). Timing and Pattern of Cell Fate Restrictions in the Neural Crest Lineage. Development124, 4351–4359. 10.1242/dev.124.21.4351
50
HodgkinsonC. A.MooreK. J.NakayamaA.SteingrímssonE.CopelandN. G.JenkinsN. A.et al (1993). Mutations at the Mouse Microphthalmia Locus Are Associated with Defects in a Gene Encoding a Novel basic-helix-loop-helix-zipper Protein. Cell74, 395–404. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90429-t
51
HopplerS.MoonR. T. (1998). BMP-2/-4 and Wnt-8 Cooperatively Pattern the Xenopus Mesoderm. Mech. Develop.71, 119–129. 10.1016/s0925-4773(98)00004-5
52
HouL.ArnheiterH.PavanW. J. (2006). Interspecies Difference in the Regulation of Melanocyte Development by SOX10 and MITF. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.103, 9081–9085. 10.1073/pnas.0603114103
53
HowardA. G.BakerP. A.Ibarra-García-PadillaR.MooreJ. A.RivasL. J.TallmanJ. J.et al (2021). An Atlas of Neural Crest Lineages along the Posterior Developing Zebrafish at Single-Cell Resolution. Elife10, e60005. 10.7554/eLife.60005
54
HsiehJ.-C.KodjabachianL.RebbertM. L.RattnerA.SmallwoodP. M.SamosC. H.et al (1999). A New Secreted Protein that Binds to Wnt Proteins and Inhibits Their Activites. Nature398, 431–436. 10.1038/18899
55
IkeyaM.LeeS. M. K.JohnsonJ. E.McMahonA. P.TakadaS. (1997). Wnt Signalling Required for Expansion of Neural Crest and CNS Progenitors. Nature389, 966–970. 10.1038/40146
56
JinE.-J.EricksonC. A.TakadaS.BurrusL. W. (2001). Wnt and BMP Signaling Govern Lineage Segregation of Melanocytes in the Avian Embryo. Develop. Biol.233, 22–37. 10.1006/dbio.2001.0222
57
KagueE.GallagherM.BurkeS.ParsonsM.Franz-OdendaalT.FisherS. (2012). Skeletogenic Fate of Zebrafish Cranial and Trunk Neural Crest. PLoS One7, e47394. 10.1371/journal.pone.0047394
58
KapurR. P. (1999). Early Death of Neural Crest Cells Is Responsible for Total Enteric Aganglionosis in Sox10Dom/Sox10Dom Mouse Embryos. Pediatr. Dev. Pathol.2, 559–569. 10.1007/s100249900162
59
KelshR. N.BrandM.JiangY. J.HeisenbergC. P.LinS.HaffterP.et al (1996). Zebrafish Pigmentation Mutations and the Processes of Neural Crest Development. Development123, 369–389. 10.1242/dev.123.1.369
60
KelshR. N.Camargo SosaK.FarjamiS.MakeevV.DawesJ. H. P.RoccoA. (2021). Cyclical Fate Restriction: a New View of Neural Crest Cell Fate Specification. Development148, dev176057. 10.1242/dev.176057
61
KelshR. N.EisenJ. S. (2000). The Zebrafish Colourless Gene Regulates Development of Non-ectomesenchymal Neural Crest Derivatives. Development127, 515–525. 10.1242/dev.127.3.515
62
KormishJ. D.SinnerD.ZornA. M. (2010). Interactions between SOX Factors and Wnt/beta-Catenin Signaling in Development and Disease. Develop. Dyn.239, 56–68. 10.1002/dvdy.22046
63
LaBonneC.Bronner-FraserM. (1998). Neural Crest Induction in Xenopus: Evidence for a Two-Signal Model. Development125, 2403–2414. 10.1242/dev.125.13.2403
64
LamborghiniJ. E. (1980). Rohon-beard Cells and Other Large Neurons inXenopus Embryos Originate during Gastrulation. J. Comp. Neurol.189, 323–333. 10.1002/cne.901890208
65
LamoreuxM. L. (2010). The Colors of Mice : A Model Genetic Network. Chichester, West Sussex ; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
66
Le DouarinN. (1973). A Biological Cell Labeling Technique and its Use in Experimental Embryology. Develop. Biol.30, 217–222. 10.1016/0012-1606(73)90061-4
67
Le DouarinN. M.KalcheimC. (1999). The Neural Crest. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68
LeeH.-Y.KléberM.HariL.BraultV.SuterU.TaketoM. M.et al (2004). Instructive Role of Wnt/ß-Catenin in Sensory Fate Specification in Neural Crest Stem Cells. Science303, 1020–1023. 10.1126/science.1091611
69
LeeR. T. H.KnapikE. W.ThieryJ. P.CarneyT. J. (2013). An Exclusively Mesodermal Origin of Fin Mesenchyme Demonstrates that Zebrafish Trunk Neural Crest Does Not Generate Ectomesenchyme. Development140, 2923–2932. 10.1242/dev.093534
70
LekvenA. C.ThorpeC. J.WaxmanJ. S.MoonR. T. (2001). Zebrafish Wnt8 Encodes Two Wnt8 Proteins on a Bicistronic Transcript and Is Required for Mesoderm and Neurectoderm Patterning. Develop. Cel1, 103–114. 10.1016/s1534-5807(01)00007-7
71
LencerE.PrekerisR.ArtingerK. B. (2021). Single-cell RNA Analysis Identifies Pre-migratory Neural Crest Cells Expressing Markers of Differentiated Derivatives. Elife10, e66078. 10.7554/eLife.66078
72
LewisJ. L.BonnerJ.ModrellM.RaglandJ. W.MoonR. T.DorskyR. I.et al (2004). Reiterated Wnt Signaling during Zebrafish Neural Crest Development. Development131, 1299–1308. 10.1242/dev.01007
73
LeynsL.BouwmeesterT.KimS.-H.PiccoloS.De RobertisE. M. (1997). Frzb-1 Is a Secreted Antagonist of Wnt Signaling Expressed in the Spemann Organizer. Cell88, 747–756. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81921-2
74
ListerJ. A.RobertsonC. P.LepageT.JohnsonS. L.RaibleD. W. (1999). Nacre Encodes a Zebrafish Microphthalmia-Related Protein that Regulates Neural-Crest-Derived Pigment Cell Fate. Development126, 3757–3767. 10.1242/dev.126.17.3757
75
LopesS. S.YangX.MüllerJ.CarneyT. J.McAdowA. R.RauchG.-J.et al (2008). Leukocyte Tyrosine Kinase Functions in Pigment Cell Development. Plos Genet.4, e1000026. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000026
76
MeijerL.SkaltsounisA.-L.MagiatisP.PolychronopoulosP.KnockaertM.LeostM.et al (2003). GSK-3-Selective Inhibitors Derived from Tyrian Purple Indirubins. Chem. Biol.10, 1255–1266. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2003.11.010
77
MillerJ. R. (2002). The Wnts. Genome Biol.3, REVIEWS3001. 10.1186/gb-2001-3-1-reviews3001
78
MinchinJ. E. N.HughesS. M. (2008). Sequential Actions of Pax3 and Pax7 Drive Xanthophore Development in Zebrafish Neural Crest. Develop. Biol.317, 508–522. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.02.058
79
MiyanariY.Torres-PadillaM.-E. (2012). Control of Ground-State Pluripotency by Allelic Regulation of Nanog. Nature483, 470–473. 10.1038/nature10807
80
MongeraA.SinghA. P.LevesqueM. P.ChenY.-Y.KonstantinidisP.Nüsslein-VolhardC. (2013). Genetic Lineage Labeling in Zebrafish Uncovers Novel Neural Crest Contributions to the Head, Including Gill Pillar Cells. Development140, 916–925. 10.1242/dev.091066
81
MukherjeeS.LuedekeD. M.BrownL.ZornA. M. (2021). SOX Transcription Factors Direct TCF-independent WNT/beta-catenin Transcription. bioRxiv2000, 457694.
82
MukhopadhyayM.ShtromS.Rodriguez-EstebanC.ChenL.TsukuiT.GomerL.et al (2001). Dickkopf1 Is Required for Embryonic Head Induction and Limb Morphogenesis in the Mouse. Develop. Cel1, 423–434. 10.1016/s1534-5807(01)00041-7
83
NguyenV. H.SchmidB.TroutJ.ConnorsS. A.EkkerM.MullinsM. C. (1998). Ventral and Lateral Regions of the Zebrafish Gastrula, Including the Neural Crest Progenitors, Are Established by abmp2b/swirlPathway of Genes. Develop. Bio.199, 93–110. 10.1006/dbio.1998.8927
84
NiehrsC. (2012). The Complex World of WNT Receptor Signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cel Biol13, 767–779. 10.1038/nrm3470
85
NikaidoM.LawE. W. P.KelshR. N. (2013). A Systematic Survey of Expression and Function of Zebrafish Frizzled Genes. PLoS One8, e54833. 10.1371/journal.pone.0054833
86
NikaidoM.SubkhankulovaT.UroshlevL. A.KasianovA. J.SosaK. C.BavisterG.et al (2021). Zebrafish Pigment Cells Develop Directly from Persistent Highly Multipotent Progenitors. bioRxiv2006, 448805.
87
NitzanE.KrispinS.PfaltzgraffE. R.KlarA.LaboskyP. A.KalcheimC. (2013). A Dynamic Code of Dorsal Neural Tube Genes Regulates the Segregation between Neurogenic and Melanogenic Neural Crest Cells. Development140, 2269–2279. 10.1242/dev.093294
88
NusseR.CleversH. (2017). Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling, Disease, and Emerging Therapeutic Modalities. Cell169, 985–999. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.016
89
OldenT.AkhtarT.BeckmanS. A.WallaceK. N. (2008). Differentiation of the Zebrafish Enteric Nervous System and Intestinal Smooth Muscle. Genesis46, 484–498. 10.1002/dvg.20429
90
OpdecampK.NakayamaA.NguyenM. T.HodgkinsonC. A.PavanW. J.ArnheiterH. (1997). Melanocyte Development In Vivo and in Neural Crest Cell Cultures: Crucial Dependence on the Mitf basic-helix-loop-helix-zipper Transcription Factor. Development124, 2377–2386. 10.1242/dev.124.12.2377
91
ParrB. A.SheaM. J.VassilevaG.McMahonA. P. (1993). Mouse Wnt Genes Exhibit Discrete Domains of Expression in the Early Embryonic CNS and Limb Buds. Development119, 247–261. 10.1242/dev.119.1.247
92
PeggeJ.TatsinkamA. J.RiderC. C.BellE. (2020). Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycans Regulate BMP Signalling during Neural Crest Induction. Develop. Biol.460 (2), 108–114. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.12.015
93
PerfettoM.XuX.LuC.ShiY.YousafN.LiJ.et al (2021). The RNA Helicase DDX3 Induces Neural Crest by Promoting AKT Activity. Develop.148, dev18434. 10.1242/dev.184341
94
PetratouK.SpencerS. A.KelshR. N.ListerJ. A. (2021). The MITF Paralog Tfec Is Required in Neural Crest Development for Fate Specification of the Iridophore Lineage from a Multipotent Pigment Cell Progenitor. PLOS ONE16, e0244794. 10.1371/journal.pone.0244794
95
PetratouK.SubkhankulovaT.ListerJ. A.RoccoA.SchwetlickH.KelshR. N. (2018). A Systems Biology Approach Uncovers the Core Gene Regulatory Network Governing Iridophore Fate Choice from the Neural Crest. Plos Genet.14, e1007402. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007402
96
PilotoS.SchillingT. F. (2010). Ovo1 Links Wnt Signaling with N-Cadherin Localization during Neural Crest Migration. Development137, 1981–1990. 10.1242/dev.048439
97
RaglandJ. W.RaibleD. W. (2004). Signals Derived from the Underlying Mesoderm Are Dispensable for Zebrafish Neural Crest Induction. Develop. Biol.276, 16–30. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.08.017
98
RaibleD. W.EisenJ. S. (1994). Restriction of Neural Crest Cell Fate in the Trunk of the Embryonic Zebrafish. Development120, 495–503. 10.1242/dev.120.3.495
99
RaibleD. W.WoodA.HodsdonW.HenionP. D.WestonJ. A.EisenJ. S. (1992). Segregation and Early Dispersal of Neural Crest Cells in the Embryonic Zebrafish. Dev. Dyn.195, 29–42. 10.1002/aja.1001950104
100
RawlsJ. F.MellgrenE. M.JohnsonS. L. (2001). How the Zebrafish Gets its Stripes. Develop. Biol.240, 301–314. 10.1006/dbio.2001.0418
101
RochaM.SinghN.AhsanK.BeirigerA.PrinceV. E. (2020). Neural Crest Development: Insights from the Zebrafish. Develop. Dyn.249, 88–111. 10.1002/dvdy.122
102
RoutledgeD.ScholppS. (2019). Mechanisms of Intercellular Wnt Transport. Development146 (10), 146. 10.1242/dev.176073
103
RuzickaL.HoweD. G.RamachandranS.ToroS.Van SlykeC. E.BradfordY. M.et al (2019). The Zebrafish Information Network: New Support for Non-coding Genes, Richer Gene Ontology Annotations and the Alliance of Genome Resources. Nucleic Acids Res.47, D867–D873. 10.1093/nar/gky1090
104
Saint-JeannetJ.-P.HeX.VarmusH. E.DawidI. B. (1997). Regulation of Dorsal Fate in the Neuraxis by Wnt-1 and Wnt-3a. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.94, 13713–13718. 10.1073/pnas.94.25.13713
105
SatoM.YostH. J. (2003). Cardiac Neural Crest Contributes to Cardiomyogenesis in Zebrafish. Develop. Biol.257, 127–139. 10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00037-x
106
Sauka-SpenglerT.Bronner-FraserM. (2008). A Gene Regulatory Network Orchestrates Neural Crest Formation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cel Biol9, 557–568. 10.1038/nrm2428
107
ScarpaE.SzabóA.BibonneA.TheveneauE.ParsonsM.MayorR. (2015). Cadherin Switch during EMT in Neural Crest Cells Leads to Contact Inhibition of Locomotion via Repolarization of Forces. Develop. Cel34, 421–434. 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.06.012
108
SchartlM.LarueL.GodaM.BosenbergM. W.HashimotoH.KelshR. N. (2016). What Is a Vertebrate Pigment Cell. Pigment Cel Melanoma Res.29, 8–14. 10.1111/pcmr.12409
109
SchillingT. F.KimmelC. B. (1994). Segment and Cell Type Lineage Restrictions during Pharyngeal Arch Development in the Zebrafish Embryo. Development120, 483–494. 10.1242/dev.120.3.483
110
SchumacherJ. A.HashiguchiM.NguyenV. H.MullinsM. C. (2011). An Intermediate Level of BMP Signaling Directly Specifies Cranial Neural Crest Progenitor Cells in Zebrafish. PLoS One6, e27403. 10.1371/journal.pone.0027403
111
ShepherdI. T.PietschJ.ElworthyS.KelshR. N.RaibleD. W. (2004). Roles for GFRα1 Receptors in Zebrafish Enteric Nervous System Development. Development131, 241–249. 10.1242/dev.00912
112
Sieber-BlumM.CohenA. M. (1980). Clonal Analysis of Quail Neural Crest Cells. Develop. Biol.80, 96–106. 10.1016/0012-1606(80)90501-1
113
SoldatovR.KauckaM.KastritiM. E.PetersenJ.ChontorotzeaT.EnglmaierL.et al (2019). Spatiotemporal Structure of Cell Fate Decisions in Murine Neural Crest. Science364. 10.1126/science.aas9536
114
StanganelloE.HagemannA. I. H.MattesB.SinnerC.MeyenD.WeberS.et al (2015). Filopodia-based Wnt Transport during Vertebrate Tissue Patterning. Nat. Commun.6, 5846. 10.1038/ncomms6846
115
StempleD. L.AndersonD. J. (1992). Isolation of a Stem Cell for Neurons and Glia from the Mammalian Neural Crest. Cell71, 973–985. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90393-q
116
SteventonB.ArayaC.LinkerC.KuriyamaS.MayorR. (2009). Differential Requirements of BMP and Wnt Signalling during Gastrulation and Neurulation Define Two Steps in Neural Crest Induction. Development136, 771–779. 10.1242/dev.029017
117
TakadaR.SatomiY.KurataT.UenoN.NoriokaS.KondohH.et al (2006). Monounsaturated Fatty Acid Modification of Wnt Protein: its Role in Wnt Secretion. Develop. Cel11, 791–801. 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.10.003
118
TakedaK.YasumotoK.-i.TakadaR.TakadaS.WatanabeK.-i.UdonoT.et al (2000). Induction of Melanocyte-specific Microphthalmia-Associated Transcription Factor by Wnt-3a. J. Biol. Chem.275, 14013–14016. 10.1074/jbc.c000113200
119
TanC.DeardorffM. A.Saint-JeannetJ.-P.YangJ.ArzoumanianA.KleinP. S. (2001). Kermit, a Frizzled Interacting Protein, Regulates Frizzled 3 Signaling in Neural Crest Development. Development128, 3665–3674. 10.1242/dev.128.19.3665
120
TatarakisD.TuttleA.SchillingT. F. (2020). Lmo7a Coordinates Neural Crest Migration and Lineage Specification by Regulating Cell Adhesion Dynamics. BioRxiv; May 2020.
121
TehC.SunG.ShenH.KorzhV.WohlandT. (2015). Modulating the Expression Level of Secreted Wnt3 Influences Cerebellum Development in Zebrafish Transgenics. Development142, 3721–3733. 10.1242/dev.127589
122
TheveneauE.SteventonB.ScarpaE.GarciaS.TrepatX.StreitA.et al (2013). Chase-and-run between Adjacent Cell Populations Promotes Directional Collective Migration. Nat. Cel Biol15, 763–772. 10.1038/ncb2772
123
TuckerJ. A.MintzerK. A.MullinsM. C. (2008). The BMP Signaling Gradient Patterns Dorsoventral Tissues in a Temporally Progressive Manner along the Anteroposterior axis. Develop. Cel14, 108–119. 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.11.004
124
TuttleA. M.HoffmanT. L.SchillingT. F. (2014). Rabconnectin-3a Regulates Vesicle Endocytosis and Canonical Wnt Signaling in Zebrafish Neural Crest Migration. Plos Biol.12, e1001852. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001852
125
VibertL.AquinoG.GehringI.SubkankulovaT.SchillingT. F.RoccoA.et al (2017). An Ongoing Role forWntsignaling in Differentiating Melanocytes In Vivo. Pigment Cel Melanoma Res.30, 219–232. 10.1111/pcmr.12568
126
VillanuevaS.GlavicA.RuizP.MayorR. (2002). Posteriorization by FGF, Wnt, and Retinoic Acid Is Required for Neural Crest Induction. Develop. Biol.241, 289–301. 10.1006/dbio.2001.0485
127
WestonJ. A. (1991). 6 Sequential Segregation and Fate of Developmentally Restricted Intermediate Cell Populations in the Neural Crest Lineage. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol.25, 133–153. 10.1016/s0070-2153(08)60414-7
128
WillertK.BrownJ. D.DanenbergE.DuncanA. W.WeissmanI. L.ReyaT.et al (2003). Wnt Proteins Are Lipid-Modified and Can Act as Stem Cell Growth Factors. Nature423, 448–452. 10.1038/nature01611
129
WuW.GlinkaA.DeliusH.NiehrsC. (2000). Mutual Antagonism between Dickkopf1 and Dickkopf2 Regulates Wnt/β-Catenin Signalling. Curr. Biol.10, 1611–1614. 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00868-x
Summary
Keywords
Wnt/β-catenin signalling, neural crest, gene regulatory network, NC induction, NC specification, pigment cells, melanocyte, Zebrafish
Citation
Sutton G, Kelsh RN and Scholpp S (2021) Review: The Role of Wnt/β-Catenin Signalling in Neural Crest Development in Zebrafish. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9:782445. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.782445
Received
24 September 2021
Accepted
16 November 2021
Published
29 November 2021
Volume
9 - 2021
Edited by
Kerstin Feistel, University of Hohenheim, Germany
Reviewed by
Kristin Artinger, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, United States
Jan Kaslin, Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (ARMI), Australia
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Sutton, Kelsh and Scholpp.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Steffen Scholpp, s.scholpp@exeter.ac.uk
This article was submitted to Morphogenesis and Patterning, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.