Mechanobiology and survival strategies of circulating tumor cells: a process towards the invasive and metastatic phenotype

Abstract

Metastatic progression is the deadliest feature of cancer. Cancer cell growth, invasion, intravasation, circulation, arrest/adhesion and extravasation require specific mechanical properties to allow cell survival and the completion of the metastatic cascade. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) come into contact with the capillary bed during extravasation/intravasation at the beginning of the metastatic cascade. However, CTC mechanobiology and survival strategies in the bloodstream, and specifically in the microcirculation, are not well known. A fraction of CTCs can extravasate and colonize distant areas despite the biomechanical constriction forces that are exerted by the microcirculation and that strongly decrease tumor cell survival. Furthermore, accumulating evidence shows that several CTC adaptations, via molecular factors and interactions with blood components (e.g., immune cells and platelets inside capillaries), may promote metastasis formation. To better understand CTC journey in the microcirculation as part of the metastatic cascade, we reviewed how CTC mechanobiology and interaction with other cell types in the bloodstream help them to survive the harsh conditions in the circulatory system and to metastasize in distant organs.

1 Introduction

Cancer is a lethal disease due to its ability to invade and metastasize in distant tissues/organs. This capacity is associated with changes in the tumor microenvironment and with mechanobiological changes in individual cancer cells. Metastatic dissemination (i.e., cancer cell spreading from a primary/initial site to neighboring or distant sites) is a unique feature of cancer cells that typically involves a series of sequential processes, including epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), invasion, intravasation, and extravasation (Fidler, 2003; Gupta and Massagué, 2006; Lambert et al., 2017). Evidence also suggests that cancer cell capacity to detach from the primary tumor and enter the blood or lymphatic vessels as single circulating tumor cells (CTCs) or CTC clusters is significantly influenced by intrinsic and/or extrinsic events in the microcirculation (Varotsos Vrynas et al., 2021). The microcirculation network of small vessels and capillaries establishes a distinct blood microenvironment with extensive and narrow branching that can slow, trap and squeeze CTCs to facilitate their extravasation (Follain et al., 2018). Intriguingly, CTCs might display adaptive mechanisms, such as stiffness and contractility, in response to constricted migration to enhance their survival. These features may also facilitate their extravasation and consequently metastasis formation (Rianna et al., 2020). The first CTC description is attributed to Thomas Ashworth in 1869 (Ashworth, 1869). Since then, CTCs have been considered an important intermediate in the metastatic cascade (Alix-Panabières and Pantel, 2021; Lin et al., 2021; Alix-Panabieres et al., 2022).

Complex biological processes of cancer cells are associated with well-described pathways (e.g., cell adhesion, cytoskeletal remodeling, EMT, and the nucleoskeleton) (Bhadriraju and Hansen, 2002; de las Heras et al., 2013; Ribatti et al., 2020). Conversely, the molecular mechanisms that regulate CTC mechanics in the microcirculation are rather elusive. Moreover, recent studies showed that mechanical changes in cancer cells, such as the dynamic regulation of cell stiffness and contractility, are common phenotypic events in cancer development, progression and metastasis (Xu et al., 2012; Gensbittel et al., 2021). In liquid biopsy (a powerful non-invasive tool for the prognosis, treatment selection, and monitoring of several cancer types) (Keller and Pantel, 2019; Alix-Panabières and Pantel, 2021), the quantification of CTC deformability (i.e., the cell capacity to change its shape under load in the microcirculation) is used to obtain the algorithmic-based objective identification of metastatic cancer cells in different body fluids (e.g., blood) (Tse et al., 2013; Dhar et al., 2016; Yu et al., 2022).

However, the specific sequence and molecular networks underlying the changes of CTC mechanotype during the metastatic cascade are not well defined. Yet, studying CTC mechanotypes and the associated molecular events may pave the way to cancer mechanobiology. Very few studies investigated the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying CTC adaptation and survival in blood, particularly in capillaries. In this review, we discuss the effects of the biomechanical forces experienced by CTCs in the blood circulation and capillaries and outline CTC adaption and survival strategies towards an invasive and metastatic phenotype in this confined environment. Better understanding CTC mechanical properties and how they can be perturbed will contribute to improve i) liquid biopsy tests by increasing CTC detection accuracy, and ii) the design of personalized therapeutics to stop tumor cell dissemination and cancer progression.

2 Cancer metastases and circulating tumor cells

Cancer metastasis has been studied for more than one century, but it remains a poorly understood biological process (Figure 1A). In 1889, Stephen Paget proposed the “seed and soil” hypothesis, according to which the crosstalk between cancer and the organ special microenvironment is crucial for cancer metastasis (Paget, 1989). The “metastatic cascade” comprises distinct sequential steps leading to secondary foci or to the colonization of distant organs/tissues (Figure 1B) (Fidler, 2003). Cancer is initiated by uncontrolled cell proliferation and growth of the primary solid tumor in a healthy tissue/organ that undergoes mutations and epigenetic alterations (Figure 1B: Growth) (Vicente-Dueñas et al., 2018). A favorable microenvironment is created for the initial cancer growth, notably through neovascularization, an inflammatory-like immune response, and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling (Whiteside, 2006; Stacker et al., 2014; He et al., 2022). Simultaneously, some primary tumor cells acquire stem cell features, such as self-renewal and the ability to differentiate into multiple cell types, by undergoing EMT. EMT leads to downregulation of genes that encode epithelial junction proteins, and consequently to disruption of adherent junctions, desmosomes and tight junctions and to loss of apical-basal polarity (Yang et al., 2020). These changes in epithelial cell junctions affect many different downstream pathways that further promote invasion (Yeung and Yang, 2017). Moreover, the expression of non-epithelial cadherin and cell surface proteins, which are critical for cell migration, is increased (Loh et al., 2019). As the cytokeratin network anchored to desmosomes is disrupted, the cortical actin cytoskeleton is reorganized into an intracellular and basal network of intermediate filaments. The development of novel membrane protrusions, such as invadopodia for matrix degradation, is facilitated by the shift to the mesenchymal state that also promotes cell motility. Additionally, actin stress filaments promote and strengthen cell contractility (Yeung and Yang, 2017). Finally, the increased number of cell protrusions and the loss of cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion, the secretion of metalloproteinases that digest the ECM, the motility and invasive behavior allow tumor cells to invade the stroma and then to intravasate to become CTCs (Figure 1B: Intravasation) (Gritsenko et al., 2017; Sznurkowska and Aceto, 2022).

FIGURE 1

Intriguingly, cancer cell (single cells or in clusters) intravasation can be facilitated by immune cells in the tumor microenvironment (Aceto et al., 2014). However, a distant metastasis develops only when tumor cells can spread throughout the blood and/or lymphatic vessels (Figure 1B: Circulation) (Brown et al., 2018; Pereira et al., 2018). In the circulation, CTCs “swim” in a very harsh environment and they will eventually arrest and adhere to the walls of vessels in distant tissues or organs where they can extravasate. Before reaching this step, they must survive the aggression by immune cells and endure the blood flow forces and adhesion forces (Osmani et al., 2019). CTCs extravasate and then initiate a distant metastasis once they find a favorable host microenvironment, known as the pre-metastatic niche (PMN). A PMN is formed through a multi-step process initiated by local (host) changes through the involvement of secretory factors and extracellular vesicles that induce vascular leakage, ECM and stroma remodeling, and immunosuppression (Peinado et al., 2017). Then, this favorable environment supports the overt colonization (i.e., tumor cell seeding) via cell-ECM interactions that supply an anchorage point for seeding, and also activate survival and proliferative signaling programs transduced through integrin complexes and their associated downstream signaling. For instance, adhesion receptors of the integrin family (e.g., integrins αvβ3, β1 and β4) are involved in CTC adhesion to endothelial cells during extravasation (Reymond et al., 2012; Barthel et al., 2013). Similarly, in vivo studies using zebrafish cancer cell xenograft models showed that the glycoprotein CD44 and the integrins αvβ3 and α5β1 are required for weak (CD44 and αvβ3) and strong (α5β1) interactions between CTCs and endothelial cells (Osmani et al., 2019). Moreover, the integrin α4β1, which is expressed by cancer cells, can serve as an alternative ligand for vascular cellular adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1 or CD106) to mediate the firm adhesion of cancer cells to the endothelium (Strell and Entschladen, 2008). In addition, neuropilin-2, expressed by CTCs, interacts with integrins, expressed on the endothelial cell surface, to promote cell attachment (Cao et al., 2013). Integrins are also found on tumor-derived extracellular vesicles and can attach to ECM molecules in organ-specific PMNs, promoting organotropic metastases. Hoshino et al. showed that tumor-associated exosomes present cancer-specific integrin profiles associated with the formation of a PMN in specific organs, for instance integrin αvβ5 and liver, α6β4, and α6β1 and lung (i.e., cancer cell organotropism) (Hoshino et al., 2015). (Figure 1B: Extravasation). On the other hand, CTCs may remain in a dormant state until their new environment changes and allows them to thrive and to form distant metastases (Aguirre-Ghiso, 2007; Hedley and Chambers, 2009; Vishnoi et al., 2015; Boral et al., 2020).

During these metastatic cascade steps, tumor cells and CTCs are subjected to a variety of external mechanical stresses that affect their survival and progression and that may lead to the acquisition of specific mechanical properties (Wirtz et al., 2011; Mohammadi and Sahai, 2018). For instance, during the early stages of tumor growth, tumor cells experience increasing levels of compressive stress due to the imbalance in fluid entry and exit into the interstitial space and the microenvironment pushing back the expanding tumor (Jain et al., 2014). Moreover, cancer tissues are generally stiffer than healthy tissues due to tumor volume expansion, increased compressive stress, and ECM stiffening (Wirtz et al., 2011; Chin et al., 2016; Nia et al., 2016). In addition, due to compressive stress, the confining primary tumor environment also favors collective cancer cell invasion (to give rise to CTC clusters), which is recognized as a necessary step for distant metastases (Haeger et al., 2014). Intravasation can occur early and throughout the tumor progression, and concerns even non-transformed epithelial cells. Moreover, it has been shown that intravasation occurs both through active cancer cell invasion of blood vessels and passive cancer cell shedding in the circulation (Bockhorn et al., 2007). These processes are triggered by mechanical stress on the tumor and/or disorganization within the tumor microenvironment.

CTCs remain enigmatic in many ways, partly, due to difficulties in studying these rare cells. Once CTCs have entered the circulation, most available evidences indicate that they stay there only very briefly, although measuring CTC half-life in the circulation has been quite challenging (Meng et al., 2004; Stott et al., 2010; Aceto et al., 2014). CTC survival, circulation in the bloodstream, their capacity to colonize distant organs, and how the circulation microenvironment influences CTC biology are open and actively investigated questions. Additionally, after stopping in the microvasculature, CTCs normally interact with the endothelium to begin extravasation (Follain et al., 2018). Our knowledge of the metastatic cascade can be improved by understanding how CTCs behave in capillaries and how they can adapt and acquire a more invasive phenotype. These topics are briefly discussed in the next section.

3 Mechanobiology of CTCs in the circulating system

The circulation is a remarkable, highly evolved system for the efficient transport of blood cells, gasses, nutrients, and hormones that provides nourishment to tissues and organs and contributes the organism defense, homeostasis, and growth. Cancer cells experience mechanical stress in the primary tumor, and also in the circulation after intravasation (Follain et al., 2020). Escape from the immediate tumor vasculature may be influenced by spatial and temporal heterogeneity in tumor blood flow patterns (Jain, 2005; Kamoun et al., 2010). Once cancer cells enter the systemic circulation and become CTCs, they are in a very harsh and unknown environment, exposed to completely different mechanical stresses due to the hemodynamic forces that constrict blood vessels (Figure 2). This is one of the reasons of CTC short half-life (Wirtz et al., 2011; Labelle and Hynes, 2012; Strilic and Offermanns, 2017). Moreover, CTCs are affected by other factors, such as blood pressure and flow patterns of the organ and also cell deformability and adhesion, enabling them to arrest in the capillary bed. CTCs must overcome all these different stresses.

FIGURE 2

When CTCs reach transport channels, they experience hemodynamic shear forces because they must flow at the blood velocity, which ranges between 0.5 and 1.5 mm/s in capillaries and reaches 120 cm/s in the aorta (Table 1) (Ivanov et al., 1981; Gisvold and Brubakk, 1982). During circulation, CTCs may undergo cell-cycle arrest or damage due to high fluid shear stress (FSS) (Figure 2A) (Regmi et al., 2017). Few CTCs and/or CTC clusters may escape FSS effects in capillaries and may stop and adhere to the endothelium. Importantly, once CTCs are released in the microcirculation, the first challenge is the size restriction to which they must adapt in few seconds. Indeed, cancer cells from solid tumors are usually larger (15–20 µm) than capillaries (3–12 µm), and the microcirculation acts as a CTC filter because most CTCs are arrested transiently in the first microvascular bed (Fidler, 1970; Luzzi et al., 1998; Cameron et al., 2000; Krog and Henry, 2018; Varotsos Vrynas et al., 2021). It is also important to consider the temporal dimension of FSS exposure. Indeed, CTCs may only freely circulate for seconds and most of the time they could be trapped in the microcirculation (Krog and Henry, 2018). However, the amounts of time spent by CTCs in free circulation and trapped in capillaries are still unknown. Certainly, some CTCs can escape from the microcirculation because they are detected in blood samples from the patients’ arm veins. Thus, cancer cells are deformable and motile and these properties may contribute to their ability to negotiate the microcirculation barrier and colonize distant sites (Figure 2B). It can be hypothesized that only deformable CTCs are detected in the circulation. Indeed, mechanical deformability has been investigated as a potential CTC detection technique (cancer mechanobiology) (Kumar et al., 2022). However, only extremely sophisticated and specialized techniques, such as single-cell atomic force microscopy, tiny needle aspiration, single-cell liquid biopsy, can be used to perform such mechanical assessments (Kumar et al., 2022). Moreover, some of the existing technologies for CTC enrichment and detection, such as ISET^TM (Hofman et al., 2011) and Parsotix^TM (Xu et al., 2015), are based on CTC size and deformability. However, these approaches present some limitations, such false positive detection and low specificity.

CTC clusters are aggregates that may include only few CTCs (homotypic clusters) or CTCs and stromal/immune cells (heterotypic clusters). CTC clusters have higher metastatic potential than single CTCs due to their larger size and a slower travelling velocity (Fidler, 1973; Aceto et al., 2014). Indeed, the lower travelling velocity of CTC clusters increases the chance of margination and attachment to the vascular wall, even in vessels with diameters too large to intercept clusters (King et al., 2015). Moreover, Au et al showed that over 90% of CTC clusters could pass through capillary-sized vessels by rapidly and reversibly reorganizing into single-file chain-like geometries that substantially reduce their hydrodynamic resistances (Au et al., 2016). Interestingly, and contrary to the assumption that CTC clusters cannot transit through narrow vessel, Au et al. findings demonstrated that the CTC cluster shape is highly plastic and that its cells can easily reorganize again into a sphere-like cluster after having traversed the capillaries (Au et al., 2016). Therefore, despite the intense mechanical deformation observed in CTC clusters when moving through capillaries, the cooperation between cells within the cluster might explain the cluster survival advantage compared with single CTCs (Au et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2018; Giuliano et al., 2018; Genna et al., 2020). The different cells present in heterotypic CTC clusters may protect against FSS and immune attacks by producing a coating shield (Tesfamariam, 2016; Yang et al., 2020). For example, Szczerba et al. demonstrated that the crosstalk between cancer cells and neutrophils within the cluster promotes CTC extravasation (Szczerba et al., 2019).

CTC arrest in the blood circulation can take two forms: i) active adhesion to vessel walls and ii) occlusion if the vessel is topographically disordered and/or narrow. Follain et al. demonstrated in vivo that low blood flow profiles can promote cell arrest without the need of physical occlusion, suggesting that active adhesion of CTCs to the endothelium is required for successful extravasation (Follain et al., 2018). However, the frequency of escape from the first capillary where they intravasate and whether this is an inactive or active process are not clear.

3.1 CTCs and fluid shear stress

Cancer cells are exposed to FSS even before entering the circulation in the form of interstitial fluid flows that produce cell surface fluid shear stress of 0.1–10 dyn/cm² (Swartz and Lund, 2012). When cancer cells enter the bloodstream, they are exposed to a completely new environment of greatly varying FSS levels (Table 1) that might be lethal for most of them (Follain et al., 2020). Although CTCs can survive exposures to extreme levels of FSS for brief periods, compared with normal epithelial cells (Barnes et al., 2012), high FSS might result in mechanical stress that can cause CTC rupture and death. Conversely, moderate shear forces favor CTC intravascular arrest and extravasation (Regmi et al., 2017; Xin et al., 2019). Regmi and others demonstrated an increase in breast CTC destruction using a microfluidic circulatory system that mimics the FSS achieved during intense exercise. In their study, necrosis occurred after 4 h and apoptosis after 16–24 h of flow (Regmi et al., 2017). Additionally, FSS generated by the frictional pressures imposed on CTCs when blood flow travels tangentially over the CTC surface can trigger mechanosensitive ion channels, such as Piezo1 and Piezo2 (Martial, 2016). For instance, it has been demonstrated that under circulatory FSS, Piezo1 activation increases the susceptibility of colorectal, prostate, and breast cancer cells to the apoptosis-inducer TRAIL (Hope et al., 2019). Moreover, during cancer cells/CTCs migration through restricted areas, Piezo1 is activated due to membrane stretching, raising the intracellular Ca²⁺ content. Piezo1 channels, in conjunction with myosin II, promote malignant cell motility in constrained areas, particularly facilitating efficient migration through narrow channels (Hung et al., 2016).

To determine whether CTC clusters behave like single CTCs upon exposure to FSS, Marella and others created a multichannel microfluidic device to reproduce the various FSS levels that characterize the human circulatory system (capillaries, veins, and arteries) and demonstrated cluster disaggregation at high FSS (Marrella et al., 2021). On the other hand, FSS may lead to CTC arrest, adhesion, and rapid extravasation to limit the risk of being destroyed. An in vitro study showed that CTCs are more resistant to FSS than expected because of a transient response triggered by plasma membrane damage that relies on extracellular calcium and actin cytoskeletal dynamics (Barnes et al., 2012). Moreover, for CTC survival, lamin A/C is essential to maintain cell integrity and to repair the plasma membrane damage caused by FSS (Mitchell et al., 2015). Upon exposure to FSS, CTC clusters develop their own survival strategies, such as the generation of stable cell aggregates resistant to anoikis (i.e., apoptosis induced by inadequate or inappropriate cell-matrix interactions) in an E-cadherin-dependent manner (Maeshiro et al., 2021).

Studies on cell survival to FSS showed that the actomyosin cytoskeleton has critical but contradictory functions. For instance, in an in vitro study, FSS-surviving CTCs showed decreased actomyosin activity, resulting in lower cell stiffness and also increased chemotherapy resistance (Xin et al., 2019). Conversely, another study found that actomyosin activity and cell stiffness enhanced tumor cell survival during FSS and that CTC clusters increased their stiffness in response to FSS via actomyosin activity, which is mediated by Ras Homologous A (RhoA) and non-muscle myosin II activity (Moose et al., 2020). Interestingly, CTC interaction with other cells, such as platelets (Tesfamariam, 2016; Ward et al., 2021), neutrophils (Chen et al., 2018; Szczerba et al., 2019), macrophages and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), allows them to resist FSS damage in the blood circulation. For example, in clusters with CTCs, CAFs increase resistance to FSS via intercellular contacts and soluble actors and by protecting CTC capacity to proliferate (Ortiz-Otero et al., 2020). Although FSS effects on CTC mechanics are not fully understood, a recent study suggested that FSS-induced EMT may play a role in improving CTC survival and metastatic potential (Choi et al., 2019; Yu et al., 2021). Thus, the mechanotransduction process that allows CTCs to survive to FSS may offer a unique therapeutic approach for CTC elimination and metastasis prevention. However, no study has brought any direct evidence that the association with other cell types allows CTCs to resist mechanical damage.

4 Determinants of cancer cells/CTC mechanical properties

CTCs experience mechanical forces and stress that affect their shape, migration and fate once they are in the microcirculation or arrested in vascular capillaries during intravasation and extravasation. Cancer cell mechanics are determined by major components, particularly the nuclear envelope, the cytoskeleton and the ECM. The ultimate consequence of cancer cell mechanical abnormalities is an altered potential for invasion and metastasis.

4.1 Nuclear envelope

In the circulation and microcirculation, the CTC nucleus experiences deformations that facilitate cell displacement in response to capillary-induced constriction. It has been demonstrated that nuclear deformation is the primary steric barrier to cell migration in confined spaces (Lautscham et al., 2015; Kamyabi and Vanapalli, 2016; Xia et al., 2018). The nucleus, which is the largest cell organelle, actively engages with the mechanical environment in addition to serve as a load-bearing organelle (Caille et al., 2002). The nucleus is typically stiffer than the cytoplasm (Dahl et al., 2008) and its regulation can ensure the successful transit of CTCs through the capillary beds to reach an optimal microenvironment where they can arrest and extravasate (Lammerding, 2011). The major components of nucleus mechanics include the nuclear membrane, membrane proteins, nuclear lamina, chromatin and intranuclear proteins. In cancer cell mechanobiology, the nuclear membrane structure and the protein network (lamin) underlying the inner nuclear membrane, known as the nuclear envelope, have been intensively explored (Chow et al., 2012). The nuclear membrane is made of two lipid bilayers (the outer nuclear membrane and inner nuclear membrane). The inner membrane is covered by the nuclear lamina with two lamin types (type A: lamin A and lamin C; and type B: lamin B) (Peter and Stick, 2012). Lamin A and C are encoded by LMNA and provide the nucleus viscous stiffness (Donnaloja et al., 2020), whereas B-type lamins confer the nucleus elasticity (Vahabikashi et al., 2022). Besides providing structural support to the nucleus, the nuclear lamina also regulates its shape and size. For instance, cancer cells that migrate through small pores (<6 μm²) show altered lamin expression (Denais et al., 2016). Lamins also enhance the nucleoskeleton capacity to stand mechanical stress by interacting with chromatin and several intranuclear proteins, such as nuclear actin, spectrin and myosin (Simon and Wilson, 2013). Lamin A plays an essential role in mechanosensitive differentiation. Low levels of lamin A and C in cancer cells reduce cell stiffness, leading to more invasive phenotypes (Harada et al., 2014; Dubik and Mai, 2020; Bell et al., 2022). Therefore, it could be hypothesized that CTCs might successfully intravasate/extravasate across the constrained environment of vascular capillaries by modulating nuclear stiffness through lamins. Low expression of lamins A/C may favor CTC migration through confined environments, but it can also result in decreased resistance to FSS, leaving the nucleus unprotected during migration and decreasing CTC viability. Reduced lamin levels reduce stiffness and promote invasion (Mitchell et al., 2015). In agreement, other studies demonstrated that low lamin A/C levels are correlated with worse prognosis and the development of distant metastases in breast (Alhudiri et al., 2019), gastric (Wu et al., 2009), lung (Kaspi et al., 2017) and colon cancer (Belt et al., 2011). The nucleus is physically connected with the surrounding cytoskeleton by proteins. This connection is facilitated by linker of the nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complexes that are multicomponent structures spanning through the nuclear envelope. The interactions between LINC complexes and cytoskeleton are also crucial for cell migration in pathological situations, such as cancer metastasis (Wirtz et al., 2011). More studies are needed to evaluate CTC arrest and extravasation capacities in relation to LMNA expression to better understand the role of CTC stiffness regulation in the metastatic cascade.

4.2 Cytoskeleton

The cytoskeleton is an intracellular network of filaments and tubules that extends from the nucleus to the plasma membrane. All cell types have three types of cytoskeletal proteins: microfilament actin, intermediate filaments, and microtubules. Mechanical forces affect all three cytoskeleton components that display different elastic properties and contribute to stabilize the cell morphological and architectural structures. Additionally, these proteins play a significant role in cancer development and progression because they actively perceive and respond to the cell environment, shape the cell, and alter the cell functions (Hall, 2009; Fife et al., 2014; Aseervatham, 2020). For instance, hypoxia-induced signaling can promote EMT that results in a range of cytoskeletal alterations, including the production of chemotherapy-resistant tubulin isoforms and the intermediate filament vimentin (Huang et al., 2019; Datta et al., 2021). Likewise, when a mechanical force is applied to cancer cells, actin filaments act a mechanosensor that senses the mechanical forces (Jégou et al., 2013). However, the alteration of actin remodeling is a dynamic, two-way process. Actin polymerization/depolymerization is finely regulated by a series of actin signaling proteins that are also part of important oncogenic signal transduction pathways (Suresh and Diaz, 2021). Moreover, the actomyosin cytoskeleton, one of the main cytoskeleton components, contributes to membrane deformation via its interaction with the cell membrane and the cytoskeleton (Farsad and De Camilli, 2003). The actomyosin cortex is in charge of the cell cortical tension. Cortical tension restricts cell deformation and is involved in membrane bulges and cell contractions. It also contributes to cell stiffness, tension levels, and breakages in the cortex. As a result, it is an active participant in the cell mechanics and offers resistance to cell deformation upon exposure to small strains (Paluch et al., 2005; Chugh and Paluch, 2018; Koenderink and Paluch, 2018). Intermediate filaments are important for resistance to cell deformation in response to large strains and operate as a safety net against severe distortion that would damage the cell (Charrier and Janmey, 2016). Therefore, the cytoskeleton is crucial for the cell stiffness and capacity to passively deform, and also for the general cell shape actively adopted during various activities (Bhadriraju and Hansen, 2002). The cytoskeleton also places the cell organelles inside its network of filaments, providing a direct connection between cell shape/deformation and important organelle repositioning during the metastatic cascade. Therefore, the cytoskeleton, which participates in both active and passive mechanical processes, may be seen as a key player in CTC mechanics for survival adaptations in the circulation.

4.3 Extracellular matrix

The ECM contains many cells and non-cell components involved in cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, and is a highly dynamic and organized meshwork (Frantz et al., 2010). The ECM is made of four primary fibrous proteins (collagen, proteoglycans, laminin, and fibronectin) and also growth factors, minerals, and water. It provides critical signals to preserve the tissue architecture, polarity, and homeostasis and to regulate cell growth and apoptosis. During cancer progression, alterations in tumor cell-ECM interactions have a significant role in regulating tumor development, malignant transformation, invasion, and metastasis, as well as treatment resistance (Winkler et al., 2020). The impact of ECM remodeling at each phase of metastasis development, from cancer survival in the circulation to the establishment of the pre-metastatic and metastatic niches, has been extensively studied in the past 10 years (Winkler et al., 2020).

The interstitial matrix and basement membrane are two major and distinct ECM types in terms of function, composition, and location. Remodeling of the interstitial ECM in cancer causes a wide range of biophysical and biochemical alterations that affect cell signaling, ECM stiffness, cell migration, and tumor growth (Egeblad et al., 2010). Conversely, the basement membrane is a more stable, sheet-like, dense structure that lines the basal surface and separates tissues into different and well organized compartments (Yurchenco, 2011). Cancer cells must remodel the basement membrane to infiltrate a stromal tissue (Chang and Chaudhuri, 2019). Various ECM remodeling events support the migration and invasion of tumor cells that eventually will enter the circulation. For instance, single-cell RNA-sequencing of pancreatic cancer-derived CTCs revealed that CTCs in the blood upregulate the expression of common stroma-derived ECM proteins (Ting et al., 2014). Moreover, transmembrane surface molecules, such as integrins and some glycoproteins, can sense the surrounding ECM fibers and function as cellular mechano-chemical sensors. For example, in the blood circulation, CTCs bypass anoikis by secreting fibronectin to reinforce integrin-dependent adhesion survival signaling (Barbazán et al., 2012). Furthermore, via heterotypic contacts with non-tumor cell types (e.g., platelets and macrophages), CTCs can promote pro-survival adhesion signaling. CTC-associated ECM can improve autocrine survival signaling in CTCs, shield them from immune cell clearance, as observed for platelets surrounding CTCs, and promote the development of CTC clusters for effective metastatic colonization (Winkler et al., 2020). CTCs arriving in secondary organs typically initiate and drive ECM remodeling. For example, breast cancer cells metastasizing to the lung produce their own tenascin C that promotes survival and macro-metastasis outgrowth via the NOTCH and WNT stem cell pathways (Oskarsson et al., 2011). Overall, deciphering the processes linking ECM to CTC survival is crucial for understanding CTC adaptation strategies.

5 Signaling pathways activated in CTCs by mechanical cues

During extravasation, CTCs need to adapt and modify their mechanical properties in response to mechanical and chemical stimuli. This mechanotransduction process leads to the induction of different signaling pathways that allow CTCs to adhere and migrate through the vascular endothelium. CTCs, like leukocytes, establish various selectin- and integrin-mediated interactions with the endothelial cells that line the capillary walls. For this, CTCs require actin cytoskeleton remodeling, which is centrally regulated by Rho GTPase signaling networks (Reymond et al., 2013; Rodenburg and van Buul, 2021). Rho GTPases are a family that includes twenty small signaling G-proteins. They are also part of the Ras GTPase superfamily that has a central role in cancer (Wennerberg et al., 2005; Heasman and Ridley, 2008). Moreover, mechanical squeezing of CTCs in capillaries increases the activity of RhoA, resulting in the recruitment and activation of Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK) (Huang et al., 2018). ROCK activation increases the activity of many proteins, including myosin II that binds to actin, leading to the contraction of the actomyosin networks and then to cell contractility increase (Moose et al., 2020). Huang et al. demonstrated that when CTCs are confined in capillaries, the RhoA-ROCK-myosin II axis is activated, thus enhancing contractility and resulting in CTC transition from an elongated to a spherical shape (Huang et al., 2018). RhoA-ROCK-myosin II activity appears to be essential for the morphological changes that occur in CTCs during arrest, leading to extravasation (Perea Paizal et al., 2021). The RhoA pathway also seems to be exploited by CTCs to overcome the limitation imposed by FSS and lack of stable arrest (Figure 3) (Huang et al., 2018). However, it is still unknown to what extent the observed RhoA activation in the microcirculation is the result of exposure to FSS in the free circulation versus mechanical squeezing in capillaries, an open question for future studies.

FIGURE 3

Human cancers frequently display hyperactivation of the Hippo signaling pathway and its downstream transcriptional coactivators Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1) and Transcriptional activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ), in response to a variety of stimuli, including mechanical cues (Dupont et al., 2011; Panciera et al., 2017; Martinez et al., 2019). Moreover, through activating transcription factors (e.g., YAP/TAZ or SRF), RhoA induction can have direct effects on the cytoskeleton, cell-ECM adhesion, and cell shape determination (Figure 3) (Cai et al., 2021). For example, Lee et al. found that FSS in the lymphatic vasculature (0.05 dyn/cm²) promotes YAP1/TAZ translocation to the nucleus, leading to cell motility changes through activation of the ROCK-LIMK-YAP1 signaling axis (Lee et al., 2017). In another study, the same FSS level increased cell division by increasing TAZ expression and promoting its nuclear translocation (Lee et al., 2018). YAP/TAZ nuclear translocation can be induced also independently of RhoA activation by forces applied directly to the nucleus or the cytoplasm. Using atomic force microscopy, Elosegui-Artola et al. showed that a force applied to the nucleus was enough to induce YAP nuclear translocation by reducing mechanical restriction in nuclear pores (Elosegui-Artola et al., 2017). Overall, these studies suggest that during CTC transit and/or arrest in capillaries, signaling pathways may be triggered by CTC deformation to enhance their metastatic potential.

6 CTCs and hetero-clusters in the circulating system

CTCs in the circulation interact with complex fluid ecosystems (blood and lymph) that are composed of different cell types. Despite the harsh survival conditions in the circulation, some CTCs will survive and contribute to metastasis in secondary sites. CTCs in the circulation can be found as heterotypic clusters with white blood cells, particularly CTC-neutrophil clusters. Szczerba et al., showed that the direct interaction of CTCs with neutrophils leads to the upregulation of some neutrophil genes, such as ARG1, CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL10, CCL2, CXCR2 and VEGFA, resulting also in transcriptomic changes in CTCs and activation of the essential pathways that control cell cycle and DNA replication (Szczerba et al., 2019). Neutrophils in CTC clusters express adhesion factors, such as vascular cell adhesion protein 1 (VCAM-1) and intracellular adhesion molecule 1 receptor (ICAM-1). Moreover, the close interaction between CTCs and neutrophils promotes the activation of proliferative pathways in CTCs via neutrophil cytokines, such as IL-6 and IL-1β (Figure 4A) (Yang et al., 2005; Guo and Oliver, 2019; Iriondo and Yu, 2019; Taftaf et al., 2021). The release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) into the extracellular space also can protect CTCs, via β1-integrin, from shear stress and immune cell-mediated cytotoxicity in the blood (Najmeh et al., 2017).

FIGURE 4

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) stimulate the subsequent steps: CTC extravasation and dissemination (Figure 4B) (Doak et al., 2018). Hamilton et al. co-cultured peripheral blood mononuclear cells with small-cell lung cancer-derived CTC lines to investigate the interactions between CTCs and macrophages. They observed that CTCs can stimulate monocyte differentiation into TAMs, which then release mediators to promote leukocyte recruitment, migration and invasion (Hamilton et al., 2016; Hamilton and Rath, 2017). In another study in colorectal cancer, the feedback loop between TAMs and cancer cells was essential for CTC EMT and intravasation into the bloodstream (Wei et al., 2019). Moreover, TAMs seem to promote CTC acquisition of mechanical adhesiveness and endurance, helping them to form protective cell clusters and confer resistance to shear stress (Osmulski et al., 2021). Thus, understanding the mechanism of direct interaction and molecular fusion between CTCs and macrophages may help to identify therapeutic targets.

Platelet recruitment and activation also play an important role in cancer metastasis because they promote CTC survival, seeding and proliferation at secondary sites (Figure 4C) (Schlesinger, 2018; Anvari et al., 2021). CTCs form bonds with platelets to survive shear forces and mechanical stress-induced cell death in the blood stream (Labelle and Hynes, 2012). It has been hypothesized that platelets shield CTCs from mechanical stress and enhance resistance to anoikis, which is mediated via YAP1 activation (Haemmerle et al., 2017). Platelets can induce several factors (e.g., platelet-derived growth factors) that stimulate and accelerate EMT in CTCs to promote invasion and metastasis (Labelle et al., 2011; Guo et al., 2019). Platelets also help CTCs to avoid natural killer cell-mediated cytolysis by forming tumor cell-platelet micro-aggregates and generating platelet-derived normal MHC-I to the surface to escape natural killer cell recognition (Placke et al., 2012). Besides safeguarding CTCs within the bloodstream, platelets are involved in their adhesion to endothelial cells. The attachment of platelets and CTCs to the endothelial wall is mediated by platelet adhesion receptors, such as integrin αIIbβ3 and P-selectin (Coupland et al., 2012; Lonsdorf et al., 2012). A study showed that the interplay between integrin α6β1 on platelets and its receptor, a disintegrin, and metalloprotease 9 on CTCs is necessary for cancer cell extravasation (Mammadova-Bach et al., 2016). Altogether, the close and complex crosstalk between CTCs and platelets might involve distinct molecules and signaling pathways and might represent a promising antitumor strategy.

7 In vitro models mimicking cell entrapment in the microcirculation

Studying CTC behavior in the microcirculation using models that mimic the real conditions is particularly challenging. Constricted microfluidic channels with a width smaller than the cell diameter can be produced using standard microfabrication techniques, and provide an environment that mimics the blood capillaries (Irimia and Toner, 2009; Zheng and Sun, 2011; Mak et al., 2013; Portillo-Lara and Annabi, 2016; Huang et al., 2017). Higher throughput microfluidic techniques are now used to assess the mechanical characteristics of cells.

Several studies have used microfluidic systems to investigate the effect of the microvasculature geometry on cells (Figure 5). For instance, constricted channels have been used to evaluate the mechanical properties of red blood cells (Shelby et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2007), leukocytes (Rosenbluth et al., 2008; Gabriele et al., 2010), and cancer cells (Raj et al., 2017). Hou et al. described a simple microfluidic channel to determine the difference in stiffness between benign and cancer breast cells (Hou et al., 2009). Khan et al., demonstrated that the cell entry time into a confined space (11 μm-diameter microchannels) is a better marker of malignancy than cell deformability using glioblastoma and normal glial cell lines (Khan and Vanapalli, 2013). Au et al. showed that CTC clusters might rearrange reversibly to traverse 5–10 μm-wide microchannels (Au et al., 2016). Nath et al. made HeLa cells circulate through 7-μm-wide constrictions and found that cell viability was reduced by 50%. Conversely, expression of MMP2, a metalloproteinase involved in stromal tissue degradation, was unchanged (Nath et al., 2018). Xia et al. made leucocytes, MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast cancer cells circulate into arrays of pores and showed that the deformation of cells and nuclei was pressure-dependent. They proposed that such studies could guide the optimization of CTC sorting devices (Xia et al., 2018). To examine the effect of different mechanical constrictions caused by geometry on the flow-driven migration of single CTCs, Cognart et al. constructed five microfluidic models with five distinct geometries (Cognart et al., 2020). By separately adjusting the pressure, they streamed two metastatic breast cancer cell lines, one mesenchymal-like (MDA-MB-231) and one epithelial-like (SK-BR-3), into the microfluidic device. In all models, MDA-MB-231 cells were more deformable than SK-BR-3 cells (Cognart et al., 2020). For more information, Ma et al. reviewed the studies that employed a microfluidic devices to examine the behavior of cancer cells during metastasis and microcirculation (Ma et al., 2018).

FIGURE 5

Microfluidic-based deformability methods have some advantages, such as easy to use, low cost and high throughput. Therefore, they are becoming a popular tool to study the cell deformability in physiological and pathological conditions. Microfluidic methods also have some limitations, because they cannot properly simulate the actual human blood capillaries and microcirculation.

Several microfluidic technologies have been developed for CTC isolation, such as Parsortix^® (ANGLE plc, Surrey, UK) (Miller et al., 2018), ClearCell^® FX1 (Biolidics Limited, Mapex, Singapore) (Lee et al., 2018), and VTX-1 (Vortex Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, United States) (Sollier-Christen et al., 2018). These technologies are based on the differences in size, deformability and stiffness of CTCs compared with normal blood cells. They also allow studying other physical properties of CTCs, such as density and electrical charges. Li et al. recently provided an overview of all applications of microfluidic devices for CTC isolation and detection (Li et al., 2022).

8 Conclusion

Considering that metastasis is the most important cause of death in patients with cancer and that CTCs play a key role in the metastatic cascade, a deeper understanding of CTC biological properties and survival strategies in the blood circulation is essential to develop innovative clinical strategies. Using the Drake equation, it was discovered that the survival of CTCs is one of the key factors in the metastatic cascade, implying that treatments that reduce CTC survival in the vascular system could greatly reduce the development of metastasis (Dujon et al., 2021). Hence, anti-cancer therapies to target specifically CTC survival in the circulatory system should significantly reduce the risk of clinical metastases (Dujon et al., 2021). Indeed, body fluids and the associated mechanics, such as hemodynamic forces and blood vessel constriction, strongly influence the fate of tumor cells in transit and of tumor-associated factors during the metastatic process. However, multiple challenges remain to fully elucidate the involvement of the body fluid mechanics in the metastatic cascade.

At the intravasation step of the metastatic cascade, CTCs and/or CTC clusters gain access to the blood circulation and face FSS and microcirculation, where they can lodge and effectively extravasate or squeeze through and move to a more distant capillary bed where extravasation may be more convenient. The mechanical stresses created by the blood flow and capillary bed constriction forces are expected to have many different effects on CTCs. These stresses typically alter cell integrity, but they can also give to CTCs a survival advantage that may increase their capacity for metastatic spread. Moreover, heterotypic clusters increase CTC survival by helping them to avoid the physical strain of fluids, anoikis and immunological cytotoxicity. More investigations to characterize the cell behavior before and during capillary transit are urgently needed. These studies should include dynamic cell analyses to measure gene expression and EMT activation to promote more metastatic phenotypes. Cell heterogeneity also should be better investigated. To examine CTC transit or cell migration in a constrained environment, most in vitro studies use cell lines that do not accurately reflect or recreate CTC variability (i.e., single cells or clusters in the circulation). Therefore, we think that permanent CTC lines, such as the colon cancer-derived CTC lines established by our laboratory (Cayrefourcq et al., 2015; Soler et al., 2018) and breast cancer-derived CTC lines (Koch et al., 2020), should be used with microfluidic platforms. These microchips can mimic the capillary constriction geometries and implement physiological fluid flows. We also anticipate that mRNA, cell signaling and proteome quantification, using high-throughput technologies to assess large numbers of cells, will help to incorporate and characterize this heterogeneity and contribute to better understand how CTCs with different phenotypes may react in constrained microenvironments.

References

• 1

  Aceto N. Bardia A. Miyamoto D. T. Donaldson M. C. Wittner B. S. Spencer J. A. et al (2014). Circulating tumor cell clusters are oligoclonal precursors of breast cancer metastasis. Cell158 (5), 1110–1122. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  Aguirre-Ghiso J. A. (2007). Models, mechanisms and clinical evidence for cancer dormancy. Nat. Rev. Cancer7 (11), 834–846. 10.1038/nrc2256

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  Alhudiri I. M. Nolan C. C. Ellis I. O. Elzagheid A. Rakha E. A. Green A. R. et al (2019). Expression of Lamin A/C in early-stage breast cancer and its prognostic value. Breast Cancer Res. Treat.174 (3), 661–668. 10.1007/s10549-018-05092-w

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  Alix-Panabieres C. Magliocco A. Cortes-Hernandez L. E. Eslami-S Z. Franklin D. Messina J. L. (2022). Detection of cancer metastasis: Past, present and future. Clin. Exp. Metastasis39 (1), 21–28. 10.1007/s10585-021-10088-w

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  Alix-Panabières C. Pantel K. (2021). Liquid biopsy: From discovery to clinical application. Cancer Discov.11 (4), 858–873. 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-1311

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  Alix-Panabières C. Pantel K. (2021). Liquid biopsy: From discovery to clinical implementation. Mol. Oncol.15 (6), 1617–1621. 10.1002/1878-0261.12997

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  Anvari S. Osei E. Maftoon N. (2021). Interactions of platelets with circulating tumor cells contribute to cancer metastasis. Sci. Rep.11 (1), 15477. 10.1038/s41598-021-94735-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  Aseervatham J. (2020). Cytoskeletal remodeling in cancer. Biol. (Basel)9 (11), 385. 10.3390/biology9110385

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  Ashworth T. (1869). A case of cancer in which cells similar to those in the tumours were seen in the blood after death. Aust. Med. J.14, 146.

  • Google Scholar

• 10

  Au S. H. Storey B. D. Moore J. C. Tang Q. Chen Y. L. Javaid S. et al (2016). Clusters of circulating tumor cells traverse capillary-sized vessels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.113 (18), 4947–4952. 10.1073/pnas.1524448113

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  Barbazán J. Alonso-Alconada L. Muinelo-Romay L. Vieito M. Abalo A. Alonso-Nocelo M. et al (2012). Molecular characterization of circulating tumor cells in human metastatic colorectal cancer. PLoS One7 (7), e40476. 10.1371/journal.pone.0040476

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  Barnes J. M. Nauseef J. T. Henry M. D. (2012). Resistance to fluid shear stress is a conserved biophysical property of malignant cells. PLoS One7 (12), e50973. 10.1371/journal.pone.0050973

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  Barthel S. R. Hays D. L. Yazawa E. M. Opperman M. Walley K. C. Nimrichter L. et al (2013). Definition of molecular determinants of prostate cancer cell bone extravasation. Cancer Res.73 (2), 942–952. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-3264

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  Bell E. S. Shah P. Zuela-Sopilniak N. Kim D. Varlet A.-A. Morival J. L. P. et al (2022). Low lamin A levels enhance confined cell migration and metastatic capacity in breast cancer. Oncogene41 (36), 4211–4230. 10.1038/s41388-022-02420-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  Belt E. J. T. Fijneman R. J. A. van den Berg E. G. Bril H. Delis-van Diemen P. M. Tijssen M. et al (2011). Loss of lamin A/C expression in stage II and III colon cancer is associated with disease recurrence. Eur. J. Cancer47 (12), 1837–1845. 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.04.025

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  Bhadriraju K. Hansen L. K. (2002). Extracellular matrix- and cytoskeleton-dependent changes in cell shape and stiffness. Exp. Cell Res.278 (1), 92–100. 10.1006/excr.2002.5557

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  Bockhorn M. Jain R. K. Munn L. L. (2007). Active versus passive mechanisms in metastasis: Do cancer cells crawl into vessels, or are they pushed?Lancet Oncol.8 (5), 444–448. 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70140-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  Boral D. Liu H. N. Kenney S. R. Marchetti D. (2020). Molecular interplay between dormant bone marrow-resident cells (BMRCs) and CTCs in breast cancer. Cancers12 (6), 1626. 10.3390/cancers12061626

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  Brown M. Assen F. P. Leithner A. Abe J. Schachner H. Asfour G. et al (2018). Lymph node blood vessels provide exit routes for metastatic tumor cell dissemination in mice. Science359(6382), 1408–1411. 10.1126/science.aal3662

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  Cai X. Wang K.-C. Meng Z. (2021). Mechanoregulation of YAP and TAZ in cellular homeostasis and disease progression. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.9. 10.3389/fcell.2021.673599

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  Caille N. Thoumine O. Tardy Y. Meister J.-J. (2002). Contribution of the nucleus to the mechanical properties of endothelial cells. J. biomechanics35 (2), 177–187. 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00201-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  Cameron M. D. Schmidt E. E. Kerkvliet N. Nadkarni K. V. Morris V. L. Groom A. C. et al (2000). Temporal progression of metastasis in lung: Cell survival, dormancy, and location dependence of metastatic inefficiency. Cancer Res.60 (9), 2541–2546.

  • Google Scholar

• 23

  Cao K. Bukač M. Sucosky P. (2016). Three-dimensional macro-scale assessment of regional and temporal wall shear stress characteristics on aortic valve leaflets. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin19 (6), 603–613. 10.1080/10255842.2015.1052419

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  Cao Y. Hoeppner L. H. Bach S. Guo Y. Wang E. Wu J. et al (2013). Neuropilin-2 promotes extravasation and metastasis by interacting with endothelial α5 integrin. Cancer Res.73 (14), 4579–4590. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0529

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  Cayrefourcq L. Mazard T. Joosse S. Solassol J. Ramos J. Assenat E. et al (2015). Establishment and characterization of a cell line from human circulating colon cancer cells. Cancer Res.75 (5), 892–901. 10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-2613

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  Chang J. Chaudhuri O. (2019). Beyond proteases: Basement membrane mechanics and cancer invasion. J. Cell Biol.218 (8), 2456–2469. 10.1083/jcb.201903066

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  Charrier E. E. Janmey P. A. (2016). Mechanical properties of intermediate filament proteins. Methods Enzym.568, 35–57. 10.1016/bs.mie.2015.09.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  Chen M. B. Hajal C. Benjamin D. C. Yu C. Azizgolshani H. Hynes R. O. et al (2018). Inflamed neutrophils sequestered at entrapped tumor cells via chemotactic confinement promote tumor cell extravasation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.115 (27), 7022–7027. 10.1073/pnas.1715932115

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  Chin L. Xia Y. Discher D. E. Janmey P. A. (2016). Mechanotransduction in cancer. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng.11, 77–84. 10.1016/j.coche.2016.01.011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  Choi H. Y. Yang G. M. Dayem A. A. Saha S. K. Kim K. Yoo Y. et al (2019). Hydrodynamic shear stress promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition by downregulating ERK and GSK3β activities. Breast Cancer Res.21 (1), 6. 10.1186/s13058-018-1071-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  Chow K. H. Factor R. E. Ullman K. S. (2012). The nuclear envelope environment and its cancer connections. Nat. Rev. Cancer12 (3), 196–209. 10.1038/nrc3219

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  Chugh P. Paluch E. K. (2018). The actin cortex at a glance. J. Cell Sci.131 (14), jcs186254. 10.1242/jcs.186254

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  Cognart H. A. Viovy J.-L. Villard C. (2020). Fluid shear stress coupled with narrow constrictions induce cell type-dependent morphological and molecular changes in SK-BR-3 and MDA-MB-231 cells. Sci. Rep.10 (1), 6386. 10.1038/s41598-020-63316-w

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  Coupland L. A. Chong B. H. Parish C. R. (2012). Platelets and P-selectin control tumor cell metastasis in an organ-specific manner and independently of NK cells. Cancer Res.72 (18), 4662–4671. 10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-4010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  Dahl K. N. Ribeiro A. J. Lammerding J. (2008). Nuclear shape, mechanics, and mechanotransduction. Circ. Res.102 (11), 1307–1318. 10.1161/circresaha.108.173989

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  Datta A. Deng S. Gopal V. Yap K. C. Halim C. E. Lye M. L. et al (2021). Cytoskeletal dynamics in epithelial-mesenchymal transition: Insights into therapeutic targets for cancer metastasis. Cancers (Basel)13 (8), 1882. 10.3390/cancers13081882

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  de las Heras J. I. Batrakou D. G. Schirmer E. C. (2013). Cancer biology and the nuclear envelope: A convoluted relationship. Seminars Cancer Biol.23 (2), 125–137. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2012.01.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  Denais C. M. Gilbert R. M. Isermann P. McGregor A. L. te Lindert M. Weigelin B. et al (2016). Nuclear envelope rupture and repair during cancer cell migration. Science352 (6283), 353–358. 10.1126/science.aad7297

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  Dhar M. Pao E. Renier C. Go D. E. Che J. Montoya R. et al (2016). Label-free enumeration, collection and downstream cytological and cytogenetic analysis of circulating tumor cells. Sci. Rep.6, 35474. 10.1038/srep35474

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  Doak G. R. Schwertfeger K. L. Wood D. K. (2018). Distant relations: Macrophage functions in the metastatic niche. Trends Cancer4 (6), 445–459. 10.1016/j.trecan.2018.03.011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  Donnaloja F. Carnevali F. Jacchetti E. Raimondi M. T. (2020). Lamin A/C mechanotransduction in laminopathies. Cells9 (5), 1306. 10.3390/cells9051306

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  Dubik N. Mai S. (2020). Lamin A/C: Function in normal and tumor cells. Cancers12 (12), 3688. 10.3390/cancers12123688

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  Dujon A. M. Capp J. P. Brown J. S. Pujol P. Gatenby R. A. Ujvari B. et al (2021). Is there one key step in the metastatic cascade?Cancers (Basel)13 (15), 3693. 10.3390/cancers13153693

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  Dupont S. Morsut L. Aragona M. Enzo E. Giulitti S. Cordenonsi M. et al (2011). Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature474 (7350), 179–183. 10.1038/nature10137

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  Egeblad M. Rasch M. G. Weaver V. M. (2010). Dynamic interplay between the collagen scaffold and tumor evolution. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.22 (5), 697–706. 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.08.015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  Elosegui-Artola A. Andreu I. Beedle A. E. M. Lezamiz A. Uroz M. Kosmalska A. J. et al (2017). Force triggers YAP nuclear entry by regulating transport across nuclear pores. Cell171 (6), 1397–1410. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  Farsad K. De Camilli P. (2003). Mechanisms of membrane deformation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.15 (4), 372–381. 10.1016/s0955-0674(03)00073-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  Fidler I. J. (1970). Metastasis: Quantitative analysis of distribution and fate of tumor emboli labeled with 125 I-5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine. J. Natl. Cancer Inst.45 (4), 773–782.

  • Google Scholar

• 49

  Fidler I. J. (2003). The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: The 'seed and soil' hypothesis revisited. Nat. Rev. Cancer3 (6), 453–458. 10.1038/nrc1098

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  Fidler I. J. (1973). The relationship of embolic homogeneity, number, size and viability to the incidence of experimental metastasis. Eur. J. Cancer9(3), 223–227. 10.1016/s0014-2964(73)80022-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  Fife C. M. McCarroll J. A. Kavallaris M. (2014). Movers and shakers: Cell cytoskeleton in cancer metastasis. Br. J. Pharmacol.171 (24), 5507–5523. 10.1111/bph.12704

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  Follain G. Herrmann D. Harlepp S. Hyenne V. Osmani N. Warren S. C. et al (2020). Fluids and their mechanics in tumour transit: Shaping metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer20 (2), 107–124. 10.1038/s41568-019-0221-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  Follain G. Osmani N. Azevedo A. S. Allio G. Mercier L. Karreman M. A. et al (2018). Hemodynamic forces tune the arrest, adhesion, and extravasation of circulating tumor cells. Dev. Cell45 (1), 33–52. 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.02.015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  Frantz C. Stewart K. M. Weaver V. M. (2010). The extracellular matrix at a glance. J. Cell Sci.123 (24), 4195–4200. 10.1242/jcs.023820

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  Gabriele S. Versaevel M. Preira P. Théodoly O. (2010). A simple microfluidic method to select, isolate, and manipulate single-cells in mechanical and biochemical assays. Lab. Chip10 (11), 1459–1467. 10.1039/c002257h

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  Genna A. Vanwynsberghe A. M. Villard A. V. Pottier C. Ancel J. Polette M. et al (2020). EMT-associated heterogeneity in circulating tumor cells: Sticky friends on the road to metastasis. Cancers12 (6), 1632. 10.3390/cancers12061632

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  Gensbittel V. Kräter M. Harlepp S. Busnelli I. Guck J. Goetz J. G. (2021). Mechanical adaptability of tumor cells in metastasis. Dev. Cell56 (2), 164–179. 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.10.011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  Gisvold S. E. Brubakk A. O. (1982). Measurement of instantaneous blood-flow velocity in the human aorta using pulsed Doppler ultrasound. Cardiovasc Res.16 (1), 26–33. 10.1093/cvr/16.1.26

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  Giuliano M. Shaikh A. Lo H. C. Arpino G. De Placido S. Zhang X. H. et al (2018). Perspective on circulating tumor cell clusters: Why it takes a village to metastasize. Cancer Res.78 (4), 845–852. 10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-2748

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  Gritsenko P. Leenders W. Friedl P. (2017). Recapitulating in vivo-like plasticity of glioma cell invasion along blood vessels and in astrocyte-rich stroma. Histochem. Cell Biol.148 (4), 395–406. 10.1007/s00418-017-1604-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  Guo B. Oliver T. G. (2019). Partners in crime: Neutrophil-CTC collusion in metastasis. Trends Immunol.40 (7), 556–559. 10.1016/j.it.2019.04.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  Guo Y. Cui W. Pei Y. Xu D. (2019). Platelets promote invasion and induce epithelial to mesenchymal transition in ovarian cancer cells by TGF-β signaling pathway. Gynecol. Oncol.153 (3), 639–650. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.02.026

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  Gupta G. P. Massagué J. (2006). Cancer metastasis: Building a framework. Cell127 (4), 679–695. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64

  Haeger A. Krause M. Wolf K. Friedl P. (2014). Cell jamming: Collective invasion of mesenchymal tumor cells imposed by tissue confinement. Biochimica Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subj.1840 (8), 2386–2395. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.03.020

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  Haemmerle M. Taylor M. L. Gutschner T. Pradeep S. Cho M. S. Sheng J. et al (2017). Platelets reduce anoikis and promote metastasis by activating YAP1 signaling. Nat. Commun.8 (1), 310–315. 10.1038/s41467-017-00411-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  Hall A. (2009). The cytoskeleton and cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev.28 (1-2), 5–14. 10.1007/s10555-008-9166-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  Hamilton G. Rath B. (2017). Circulating tumor cell interactions with macrophages: Implications for biology and treatment. Transl. Lung Cancer Res.6 (4), 418–430. 10.21037/tlcr.2017.07.04

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  Hamilton G. Rath B. Klameth L. Hochmair M. J. (2016). Small cell lung cancer: Recruitment of macrophages by circulating tumor cells. Oncoimmunology5 (3), e1093277. 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1093277

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  Harada T. Swift J. Irianto J. Shin J. W. Spinler K. R. Athirasala A. et al (2014). Nuclear lamin stiffness is a barrier to 3D migration, but softness can limit survival. J. Cell Biol.204 (5), 669–682. 10.1083/jcb.201308029

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 70

  He X. Lee B. Jiang Y. (2022). Extracellular matrix in cancer progression and therapy. Med. Rev.2(2), 125–139. 10.1515/mr-2021-0028

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  Heasman S. J. Ridley A. J. (2008). Mammalian Rho GTPases: New insights into their functions from in vivo studies. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.9 (9), 690–701. 10.1038/nrm2476

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72

  Hedley B. D. Chambers A. F. (2009). Tumor dormancy and metastasis. Adv. Cancer Res.102, 67–101. 10.1016/s0065-230x(09)02003-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73

  Hofman V. J. Ilie M. I. Bonnetaud C. Selva E. Long E. Molina T. et al (2011). Cytopathologic detection of circulating tumor cells using the isolation by size of epithelial tumor cell method: Promises and pitfalls. Am. J. Clin. Pathol.135 (1), 146–156. 10.1309/ajcp9x8ozbeiqvvi

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74

  Hope J. M. Lopez-Cavestany M. Wang W. Reinhart-King C. A. King M. R. (2019). Activation of Piezo1 sensitizes cells to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis through mitochondrial outer membrane permeability. Cell Death Dis.10 (11), 837. 10.1038/s41419-019-2063-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75

  Hoshino A. Costa-Silva B. Shen T.-L. Rodrigues G. Hashimoto A. Tesic Mark M. et al (2015). Tumour exosome integrins determine organotropic metastasis. Nature527 (7578), 329–335. 10.1038/nature15756

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76

  Hou H. W. Li Q. S. Lee G. Y. Kumar A. P. Ong C. N. Lim C. T. (2009). Deformability study of breast cancer cells using microfluidics. Biomed. Microdevices11 (3), 557–564. 10.1007/s10544-008-9262-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 77

  Huang D. Cao L. Xiao L. Song J. X. Zhang Y. J. Zheng P. et al (2019). Hypoxia induces actin cytoskeleton remodeling by regulating the binding of CAPZA1 to F-actin via PIP2 to drive EMT in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett.448, 117–127. 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.01.042

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 78

  Huang X. Yang Y. Zhao Y. Cao D. Ai X. Zeng A. et al (2018). RhoA-stimulated intra-capillary morphology switch facilitates the arrest of individual circulating tumor cells. Int. J. Cancer142 (10), 2094–2105. 10.1002/ijc.31238

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 79

  Huang Y. L. Segall J. E. Wu M. (2017). Microfluidic modeling of the biophysical microenvironment in tumor cell invasion. Lab a Chip17 (19), 3221–3233. 10.1039/c7lc00623c

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80

  Hung W. C. Yang J. R. Yankaskas C. L. Wong B. S. Wu P. H. Pardo-Pastor C. et al (2016). Confinement sensing and signal optimization via Piezo1/PKA and myosin II pathways. Cell Rep.15 (7), 1430–1441. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.035

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 81

  Irimia D. Toner M. (2009). Spontaneous migration of cancer cells under conditions of mechanical confinement. Integr. Biol.1 (8-9), 506–512. 10.1039/b908595e

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 82

  Iriondo O. Yu M. (2019). Unexpected friendship: Neutrophils help tumor cells en route to metastasis. Dev. Cell49 (3), 308–310. 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.04.021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 83

  Ivanov K. P. Kalinina M. K. Levkovich Y. I. (1981). Blood flow velocity in capillaries of brain and muscles and its physiological significance. Microvasc. Res.22 (2), 143–155. 10.1016/0026-2862(81)90084-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 84

  Jain R. K. Martin J. D. Stylianopoulos T. (2014). The role of mechanical forces in tumor growth and therapy. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng.16 (1), 321–346. 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071813-105259

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 85

  Jain R. K. (2005). Normalization of tumor vasculature: An emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy. Science307(5706), 58–62. 10.1126/science.1104819

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 86

  Jégou A. Carlier M. F. Romet-Lemonne G. (2013). Formin mDia1 senses and generates mechanical forces on actin filaments. Nat. Commun.4, 1883. 10.1038/ncomms2888

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 87

  Kamoun W. S. Chae S.-S. Lacorre D. A. Tyrrell J. A. Mitre M. Gillissen M. A. et al (2010). Simultaneous measurement of RBC velocity, flux, hematocrit and shear rate in vascular networks. Nat. Methods7 (8), 655–660. 10.1038/nmeth.1475

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 88

  Kamyabi N. Vanapalli S. A. (2016). Microfluidic cell fragmentation for mechanical phenotyping of cancer cells. Biomicrofluidics10 (2), 021102. 10.1063/1.4944057

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 89

  Kaspi E. Frankel D. Guinde J. Perrin S. Laroumagne S. Robaglia-Schlupp A. et al (2017). Low lamin A expression in lung adenocarcinoma cells from pleural effusions is a pejorative factor associated with high number of metastatic sites and poor Performance status. PLoS One12 (8), e0183136. 10.1371/journal.pone.0183136

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 90

  Keller L. Pantel K. (2019). Unravelling tumour heterogeneity by single-cell profiling of circulating tumour cells. Nat. Rev. Cancer19 (10), 553–567. 10.1038/s41568-019-0180-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 91

  Khan Z. S. Vanapalli S. A. (2013). Probing the mechanical properties of brain cancer cells using a microfluidic cell squeezer device. Biomicrofluidics7 (1), 11806. 10.1063/1.4774310

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 92

  King M. R. Phillips K. G. Mitrugno A. Lee T. R. de Guillebon A. M. Chandrasekaran S. et al (2015). A physical sciences network characterization of circulating tumor cell aggregate transport. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.308 (10), C792–C802. 10.1152/ajpcell.00346.2014

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 93

  Koch C. Kuske A. Joosse S. A. Yigit G. Sflomos G. Thaler S. et al (2020). Characterization of circulating breast cancer cells with tumorigenic and metastatic capacity. EMBO Mol. Med.12 (9), e11908. 10.15252/emmm.201911908

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 94

  Koenderink G. H. Paluch E. K. (2018). Architecture shapes contractility in actomyosin networks. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.50, 79–85. 10.1016/j.ceb.2018.01.015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 95

  Krog B. L. Henry M. D. (2018). Biomechanics of the circulating tumor cell microenvironment. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.1092, 209–233. 10.1007/978-3-319-95294-9_11

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 96

  Kumar J. Basak S. Kalkal A. Packirisamy G. (2022). Recent advances in nanotechnology and microfluidic-based approaches for isolation and detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Nano-Structures Nano-Objects31, 100886. 10.1016/j.nanoso.2022.100886

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 97

  Labelle M. Begum S. Hynes R. O. (2011). Direct signaling between platelets and cancer cells induces an epithelial-mesenchymal-like transition and promotes metastasis. Cancer Cell20 (5), 576–590. 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.09.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 98

  Labelle M. Hynes R. O. (2012). The initial hours of metastasis: The importance of cooperative host-tumor cell interactions during hematogenous dissemination. Cancer Discov.2 (12), 1091–1099. 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-12-0329

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 99

  Lambert A. W. Pattabiraman D. R. Weinberg R. A. (2017). Emerging biological principles of metastasis. Cell168 (4), 670–691. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.037

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 100

  Lammerding J. (2011). Mechanics of the nucleus. Compr. Physiol.1 (2), 783–807. 10.1002/cphy.c100038

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 101

  Lautscham L. A. Kämmerer C. Lange J. R. Kolb T. Mark C. Schilling A. et al (2015). Migration in confined 3D environments is determined by a combination of adhesiveness, nuclear volume, contractility, and cell stiffness. Biophys. J.109 (5), 900–913. 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.07.025

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 102

  Lee H. J. Diaz M. F. Price K. M. Ozuna J. A. Zhang S. Sevick-Muraca E. M. et al (2017). Fluid shear stress activates YAP1 to promote cancer cell motility. Nat. Commun.8 (1), 14122. 10.1038/ncomms14122

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 103

  Lee H. J. Ewere A. Diaz M. F. Wenzel P. L. (2018). TAZ responds to fluid shear stress to regulate the cell cycle. Cell Cycle17 (2), 147–153. 10.1080/15384101.2017.1404209

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 104

  Lee W. G. Bang H. Yun H. Lee J. Park J. Kim J. K. et al (2007). On-chip erythrocyte deformability test under optical pressure. Lab. Chip7 (4), 516–519. 10.1039/b614912j

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 105

  Lee Y. Guan G. Bhagat A. A. (2018). ClearCell® FX, a label-free microfluidics technology for enrichment of viable circulating tumor cells. Cytom. A93 (12), 1251–1254. 10.1002/cyto.a.23507

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 106

  Li C. He W. Wang N. Xi Z. Deng R. Liu X. et al (2022). Application of microfluidics in detection of circulating tumor cells. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.10, 907232. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.907232

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 107

  Lin D. Shen L. Luo M. Zhang K. Li J. Yang Q. et al (2021). Circulating tumor cells: Biology and clinical significance. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther.6 (1), 404. 10.1038/s41392-021-00817-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 108

  Loh C. Y. Chai J. Y. Tang T. F. Wong W. F. Sethi G. Shanmugam M. K. et al (2019). The E-cadherin and N-cadherin switch in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition: Signaling, therapeutic implications, and challenges. Cells8 (10), 1118. 10.3390/cells8101118

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 109

  Lonsdorf A. S. Krämer B. F. Fahrleitner M. Schönberger T. Gnerlich S. Ring S. et al (2012). Engagement of αIIbβ3 (GPIIb/IIIa) with ανβ3 integrin mediates interaction of melanoma cells with platelets: A connection to hematogenous metastasis. J. Biol. Chem.287 (3), 2168–2178. 10.1074/jbc.M111.269811

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 110

  Luzzi K. J. MacDonald I. C. Schmidt E. E. Kerkvliet N. Morris V. L. Chambers A. F. et al (1998). Multistep nature of metastatic inefficiency: Dormancy of solitary cells after successful extravasation and limited survival of early micrometastases. Am. J. Pathol.153 (3), 865–873. 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)65628-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 111

  Ma Y.-H. V. Middleton K. You L. Sun Y. (2018). A review of microfluidic approaches for investigating cancer extravasation during metastasis. Microsystems Nanoeng.4 (1), 17104. 10.1038/micronano.2017.104

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 112

  Maeshiro M. Shinriki S. Liu R. Nakachi Y. Komohara Y. Fujiwara Y. et al (2021). Colonization of distant organs by tumor cells generating circulating homotypic clusters adaptive to fluid shear stress. Sci. Rep.11 (1), 6150. 10.1038/s41598-021-85743-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 113

  Mak M. Reinhart-King C. A. Erickson D. (2013). Elucidating mechanical transition effects of invading cancer cells with a subnucleus-scaled microfluidic serial dimensional modulation device. Lab a Chip13 (3), 340–348. 10.1039/c2lc41117b

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 114

  Mammadova-Bach E. Zigrino P. Brucker C. Bourdon C. Freund M. De Arcangelis A. et al (2016). Platelet integrin α6β1 controls lung metastasis through direct binding to cancer cell-derived ADAM9. JCI Insight1 (14), e88245. 10.1172/jci.insight.88245

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 115

  Marrella A. Fedi A. Varani G. Vaccari I. Fato M. Firpo G. et al (2021). High blood flow shear stress values are associated with circulating tumor cells cluster disaggregation in a multi-channel microfluidic device. PLoS One16 (1), e0245536. 10.1371/journal.pone.0245536

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 116

  Martial S. (2016). Involvement of ion channels and transporters in carcinoma angiogenesis and metastasis. Am. J. Physiology-Cell Physiology310 (9), C710–C727. 10.1152/ajpcell.00218.2015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 117

  Martinez B. Yang Y. Harker D. M. R. Farrar C. Mukundan H. Nath P. et al (2019). YAP/TAZ related BioMechano signal transduction and cancer metastasis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.7, 199. 10.3389/fcell.2019.00199

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 118

  Meng S. Tripathy D. Frenkel E. P. Shete S. Naftalis E. Z. Huth J. F. et al (2004). Circulating tumor cells in patients with breast cancer dormancy. Clin. Cancer Res.10 (24), 8152–8162. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1110

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 119

  Miller M. C. Robinson P. S. Wagner C. O'Shannessy D. J. (2018). The Parsortix™ Cell Separation System-A versatile liquid biopsy platform. Cytom. A93 (12), 1234–1239. 10.1002/cyto.a.23571

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 120

  Mitchell M. J. Denais C. Chan M. F. Wang Z. Lammerding J. King M. R. (2015). Lamin A/C deficiency reduces circulating tumor cell resistance to fluid shear stress. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.309 (11), C736–C746. 10.1152/ajpcell.00050.2015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 121

  Mohammadi H. Sahai E. (2018). Mechanisms and impact of altered tumour mechanics. Nat. Cell Biol.20 (7), 766–774. 10.1038/s41556-018-0131-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 122

  Moose D. L. Krog B. L. Kim T. H. Zhao L. Williams-Perez S. Burke G. et al (2020). Cancer cells resist mechanical destruction in circulation via RhoA/actomyosin-dependent mechano-adaptation. Cell Rep.30 (11), 3864–3874. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.02.080

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 123

  Najmeh S. Cools‐Lartigue J. Rayes R. F. Gowing S. Vourtzoumis P. Bourdeau F. et al (2017). Neutrophil extracellular traps sequester circulating tumor cells via β1‐integrin mediated interactions. Int. J. cancer140 (10), 2321–2330. 10.1002/ijc.30635

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 124

  Nath B. Raza A. Sethi V. Dalal A. Ghosh S. S. Biswas G. (2018). Understanding flow dynamics, viability and metastatic potency of cervical cancer (HeLa) cells through constricted microchannel. Sci. Rep.8 (1), 17357. 10.1038/s41598-018-35646-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 125

  Nia H. T. Liu H. Seano G. Datta M. Jones D. Rahbari N. et al (2016). Solid stress and elastic energy as measures of tumour mechanopathology. Nat. Biomed. Eng.1, 0004. 10.1038/s41551-016-0004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 126

  Ortiz-Otero N. Clinch A. B. Hope J. Wang W. Reinhart-King C. A. King M. R. (2020). Cancer associated fibroblasts confer shear resistance to circulating tumor cells during prostate cancer metastatic progression. Oncotarget11 (12), 1037–1050. 10.18632/oncotarget.27510

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 127

  Oskarsson T. Acharyya S. Zhang X. H. Vanharanta S. Tavazoie S. F. Morris P. G. et al (2011). Breast cancer cells produce tenascin C as a metastatic niche component to colonize the lungs. Nat. Med.17 (7), 867–874. 10.1038/nm.2379

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 128

  Osmani N. Follain G. García León M. J. Lefebvre O. Busnelli I. Larnicol A. et al (2019). Metastatic tumor cells exploit their adhesion repertoire to counteract shear forces during intravascular arrest. Cell Rep.28 (10), 2491–2500. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.07.102

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 129

  Osmulski P. A. Cunsolo A. Chen M. Qian Y. Lin C.-L. Hung C.-N. et al (2021). Contacts with macrophages promote an aggressive nanomechanical phenotype of circulating tumor cells in prostate cancer. Cancer Res.81 (15), 4110–4123. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-3595

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 130

  Paget S. (1989). The distribution of secondary growths in cancer of the breast. 1889. Cancer Metastasis Rev.8 (2), 98–101.

  • Google Scholar

• 131

  Paluch E. Piel M. Prost J. Bornens M. Sykes C. (2005). Cortical actomyosin breakage triggers shape oscillations in cells and cell fragments. Biophysical J.89 (1), 724–733. 10.1529/biophysj.105.060590

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 132

  Panciera T. Azzolin L. Cordenonsi M. Piccolo S. (2017). Mechanobiology of YAP and TAZ in physiology and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.18 (12), 758–770. 10.1038/nrm.2017.87

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 133

  Peinado H. Zhang H. Matei I. R. Costa-Silva B. Hoshino A. Rodrigues G. et al (2017). Pre-metastatic niches: Organ-specific homes for metastases. Nat. Rev. Cancer17 (5), 302–317. 10.1038/nrc.2017.6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 134

  Perea Paizal J. Au S. H. Bakal C. (2021). Squeezing through the microcirculation: Survival adaptations of circulating tumour cells to seed metastasis. Br. J. Cancer124 (1), 58–65. 10.1038/s41416-020-01176-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 135

  Pereira E. R. Kedrin D. Seano G. Gautier O. Meijer E. F. J. Jones D. et al (2018). Lymph node metastases can invade local blood vessels, exit the node, and colonize distant organs in mice. Science359(6382), 1403–1407. 10.1126/science.aal3622

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 136

  Peter A. Stick R. (2012). Evolution of the lamin protein family: What introns can tell. Nucleus3 (1), 44–59. 10.4161/nucl.18927

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 137

  Placke T. Örgel M. Schaller M. Jung G. Rammensee H. G. Kopp H. G. et al (2012). Platelet-derived MHC class I confers a pseudonormal phenotype to cancer cells that subverts the antitumor reactivity of natural killer immune cells. Cancer Res.72 (2), 440–448. 10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-1872

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 138

  Portillo-Lara R. Annabi N. (2016). Microengineered cancer-on-a-chip platforms to study the metastatic microenvironment. Lab a chip16 (21), 4063–4081. 10.1039/c6lc00718j

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 139

  Raj A. Dixit M. Doble M. Sen A. K. (2017). A combined experimental and theoretical approach towards mechanophenotyping of biological cells using a constricted microchannel. Lab. Chip17 (21), 3704–3716. 10.1039/c7lc00599g

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 140

  Regmi S. Fu A. Luo K. Q. (2017). High shear stresses under exercise condition destroy circulating tumor cells in a microfluidic system. Sci. Rep.7 (1), 39975. 10.1038/srep39975

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 141

  Reymond N. d'Água B. B. Ridley A. J. (2013). Crossing the endothelial barrier during metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer13 (12), 858–870. 10.1038/nrc3628

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 142

  Reymond N. Im J. H. Garg R. Vega F. M. Borda d’Agua B. Riou P. et al (2012). Cdc42 promotes transendothelial migration of cancer cells through β1 integrin. J. Cell Biol.199 (4), 653–668. 10.1083/jcb.201205169

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 143

  Rianna C. Radmacher M. Kumar S. (2020). Direct evidence that tumor cells soften when navigating confined spaces. Mol. Biol. Cell31 (16), 1726–1734. 10.1091/mbc.E19-10-0588

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 144

  Ribatti D. Tamma R. Annese T. (2020). Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer: A historical overview. Transl. Oncol.13 (6), 100773. 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100773

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 145

  Rodenburg W. S. van Buul J. D. (2021). Rho GTPase signalling networks in cancer cell transendothelial migration. Vasc. Biol.3 (1), R77–r95. 10.1530/vb-21-0008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 146

  Rosenbluth M. J. Lam W. A. Fletcher D. A. (2008). Analyzing cell mechanics in hematologic diseases with microfluidic biophysical flow cytometry. Lab. Chip8 (7), 1062–1070. 10.1039/b802931h

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 147

  Schlesinger M. (2018). Role of platelets and platelet receptors in cancer metastasis. J. Hematol. Oncol.11 (1), 125. 10.1186/s13045-018-0669-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 148

  Shelby J. P. White J. Ganesan K. Rathod P. K. Chiu D. T. (2003). A microfluidic model for single-cell capillary obstruction by Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.100 (25), 14618–14622. 10.1073/pnas.2433968100

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 149

  Simon D. N. Wilson K. L. (2013). Partners and post-translational modifications of nuclear lamins. Chromosoma122 (1), 13–31. 10.1007/s00412-013-0399-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 150

  Soler A. Cayrefourcq L. Mazard T. Babayan A. Lamy P. J. Assou S. et al (2018). Autologous cell lines from circulating colon cancer cells captured from sequential liquid biopsies as model to study therapy-driven tumor changes. Sci. Rep.8 (1), 15931. 10.1038/s41598-018-34365-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 151

  Sollier-Christen E. Renier C. Kaplan T. Kfir E. Crouse S. C. (2018). VTX-1 liquid biopsy system for fully-automated and label-free isolation of circulating tumor cells with automated enumeration by BioView platform. Cytom. A93 (12), 1240–1245. 10.1002/cyto.a.23592

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 152

  Stacker S. A. Williams S. P. Karnezis T. Shayan R. Fox S. B. Achen M. G. (2014). Lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic vessel remodelling in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer14 (3), 159–172. 10.1038/nrc3677

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 153

  Stott S. L. Lee R. J. Nagrath S. Yu M. Miyamoto D. T. Ulkus L. et al (2010). Isolation and characterization of circulating tumor cells from patients with localized and metastatic prostate cancer. Sci. Transl. Med.2(25), 25ra23. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000403

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 154

  Strell C. Entschladen F. (2008). Extravasation of leukocytes in comparison to tumor cells. Cell Commun. Signal6, 10. 10.1186/1478-811x-6-10

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 155

  Strilic B. Offermanns S. (2017). Intravascular survival and extravasation of tumor cells. Cancer Cell32 (3), 282–293. 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.07.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 156

  Suresh R. Diaz R. J. (2021). The remodelling of actin composition as a hallmark of cancer. Transl. Oncol.14 (6), 101051. 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101051

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 157

  Swartz M. A. Lund A. W. (2012). Lymphatic and interstitial flow in the tumour microenvironment: Linking mechanobiology with immunity. Nat. Rev. Cancer12 (3), 210–219. 10.1038/nrc3186

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 158

  Szczerba B. M. Castro-Giner F. Vetter M. Krol I. Gkountela S. Landin J. et al (2019). Neutrophils escort circulating tumour cells to enable cell cycle progression. Nature566 (7745), 553–557. 10.1038/s41586-019-0915-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 159

  Sznurkowska M. K. Aceto N. (2022). The gate to metastasis: Key players in cancer cell intravasation. Febs J.289 (15), 4336–4354. 10.1111/febs.16046

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 160

  Taftaf R. Liu X. Singh S. Jia Y. Dashzeveg N. K. Hoffmann A. D. et al (2021). ICAM1 initiates CTC cluster formation and trans-endothelial migration in lung metastasis of breast cancer. Nat. Commun.12 (1), 4867. 10.1038/s41467-021-25189-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 161

  Tesfamariam B. (2016). Involvement of platelets in tumor cell metastasis. Pharmacol. Ther.157, 112–119. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.11.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 162

  Ting D. T. Wittner B. S. Ligorio M. Vincent Jordan N. Shah A. M. Miyamoto D. T. et al (2014). Single-cell RNA sequencing identifies extracellular matrix gene expression by pancreatic circulating tumor cells. Cell Rep.8 (6), 1905–1918. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.029

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 163

  Tse H. T. Gossett D. R. Moon Y. S. Masaeli M. Sohsman M. Ying Y. et al (2013). Quantitative diagnosis of malignant pleural effusions by single-cell mechanophenotyping. Sci. Transl. Med.5 (212), 212ra163. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006559

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 164

  Vahabikashi A. Adam S. A. Medalia O. Goldman R. D. (2022). Nuclear lamins: Structure and function in mechanobiology. Apl. Bioeng.6 (1), 011503. 10.1063/5.0082656

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 165

  Varotsos Vrynas A. Perea Paizal J. Bakal C. Au S. H. (2021). Arresting metastasis within the microcirculation. Clin. Exp. Metastasis38 (4), 337–342. 10.1007/s10585-021-10109-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 166

  Vicente-Dueñas C. Hauer J. Cobaleda C. Borkhardt A. Sánchez-García I. (2018). Epigenetic priming in cancer initiation. Trends Cancer4 (6), 408–417. 10.1016/j.trecan.2018.04.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 167

  Vishnoi M. Peddibhotla S. Yin W. George G. C. Hong D. S. Marchetti D. (2015). The isolation and characterization of CTC subsets related to breast cancer dormancy. Sci. Rep.5, 17533. 10.1038/srep17533

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 168

  Ward M. P. Kane L. E. Norris L. A. Mohamed B. M. Kelly T. Bates M. et al (2021). Platelets, immune cells and the coagulation cascade; friend or foe of the circulating tumour cell?Mol. Cancer20 (1), 59. 10.1186/s12943-021-01347-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 169

  Wei C. Yang C. Wang S. Shi D. Zhang C. Lin X. et al (2019). Crosstalk between cancer cells and tumor associated macrophages is required for mesenchymal circulating tumor cell-mediated colorectal cancer metastasis. Mol. cancer18 (1), 64–23. 10.1186/s12943-019-0976-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 170

  Wennerberg K. Rossman K. L. Der C. J. (2005). The Ras superfamily at a glance. J. Cell Sci.118 (5), 843–846. 10.1242/jcs.01660

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 171

  Whiteside T. L. (2006). The role of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Treat. Res.130, 103–124. 10.1007/0-387-26283-0_5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 172

  Winkler J. Abisoye-Ogunniyan A. Metcalf K. J. Werb Z. (2020). Concepts of extracellular matrix remodelling in tumour progression and metastasis. Nat. Commun.11 (1), 5120. 10.1038/s41467-020-18794-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 173

  Wirtz D. Konstantopoulos K. Searson P. C. (2011). The physics of cancer: The role of physical interactions and mechanical forces in metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer11 (7), 512–522. 10.1038/nrc3080

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 174

  Wu Z. Wu L. Weng D. Xu D. Geng J. Zhao F. (2009). Reduced expression of lamin A/C correlates with poor histological differentiation and prognosis in primary gastric carcinoma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res.28 (1), 8. 10.1186/1756-9966-28-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 175

  Xia Y. Wan Y. Hao S. Nisic M. Harouaka R. A. Chen Y. et al (2018). Nucleus of circulating tumor cell determines its translocation through biomimetic microconstrictions and its physical enrichment by microfiltration. Small14 (44), 1802899. 10.1002/smll.201802899

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 176

  Xin Y. Chen X. Tang X. Li K. Yang M. Tai W. C. et al (2019). Mechanics and actomyosin-dependent survival/chemoresistance of suspended tumor cells in shear flow. Biophys. J.116 (10), 1803–1814. 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.04.011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 177

  Xu L. Mao X. Imrali A. Syed F. Mutsvangwa K. Berney D. et al (2015). Optimization and evaluation of a novel size based circulating tumor cell isolation system. PLoS One10 (9), e0138032. 10.1371/journal.pone.0138032

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 178

  Xu W. Mezencev R. Kim B. Wang L. McDonald J. Sulchek T. (2012). Cell stiffness is a biomarker of the metastatic potential of ovarian cancer cells. PLoS One7 (10), e46609. 10.1371/journal.pone.0046609

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 179

  Yang J. Antin P. Berx G. Blanpain C. Brabletz T. Bronner M. et al (2020). Guidelines and definitions for research on epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.21 (6), 341–352. 10.1038/s41580-020-0237-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 180

  Yang L. Froio R. M. Sciuto T. E. Dvorak A. M. Alon R. Luscinskas F. W. (2005). ICAM-1 regulates neutrophil adhesion and transcellular migration of TNF-alpha-activated vascular endothelium under flow. Blood106 (2), 584–592. 10.1182/blood-2004-12-4942

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 181

  Yang L. Liu Q. Zhang X. Liu X. Zhou B. Chen J. et al (2020). DNA of neutrophil extracellular traps promotes cancer metastasis via CCDC25. Nature583 (7814), 133–138. 10.1038/s41586-020-2394-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 182

  Yeung K. T. Yang J. (2017). Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in tumor metastasis. Mol. Oncol.11 (1), 28–39. 10.1002/1878-0261.12017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 183

  Yu H. He J. Su G. Wang Y. Fang F. Yang W. et al (2021). Fluid shear stress activates YAP to promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol. Oncol.15 (11), 3164–3183. 10.1002/1878-0261.13061

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 184

  Yu W. Sharma S. Rao E. Rowat A. C. Gimzewski J. K. Han D. et al (2022). Cancer cell mechanobiology: A new frontier for cancer research. J. Natl. Cancer Cent.2 (1), 10–17. 10.1016/j.jncc.2021.11.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 185

  Yurchenco P. D. (2011). Basement membranes: Cell scaffoldings and signaling platforms. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.3 (2), a004911. 10.1101/cshperspect.a004911

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 186

  Zheng Y. Sun Y. (2011). Microfluidic devices for mechanical characterisation of single cells in suspension. Micro and Nano Lett.6 (5), 327–331. 10.1049/mnl.2011.0010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar