<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "archivearticle.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2235-2988</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fcimb.2022.1029768</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Cellular and Infection Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Application of <italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic>-specific SAG1, GRA7 and BAG1 proteins in serodiagnosis of animal toxoplasmosis</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname>
<given-names>Tongsheng</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ai</surname>
<given-names>Jingkai</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>Yali</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/545649"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>Hejia</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname>
<given-names>Ming</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1454601"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>You</surname>
<given-names>Xiaoqian</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Jixu</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1075302"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>State Key Laboratory of Plateau Ecology and Agriculture, Qinghai University</institution>, <addr-line>Xining</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>College of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Qinghai University</institution>, <addr-line>Xining</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Pathogen Diagnosis for Animal Diseases and Green Technical Research for Prevention and Control, Qinghai University</institution>, <addr-line>Xining</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
<institution>Qinghai Animal Disease Control Center, Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of Qinghai Province</institution>, <addr-line>Xining</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Ningbo Xia, South China Agricultural University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Veeranoot Nissapatorn, Walailak University, Thailand; Hong-Juan Peng, Southern Medical University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Jixu Li, <email xlink:href="mailto:lijixu@qhu.edu.cn">lijixu@qhu.edu.cn</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn003">
<p>&#x2020;These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002">
<p>This article was submitted to Parasite and Host, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>15</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>1029768</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>27</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>05</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2022 Qi, Ai, Sun, Ma, Kang, You and Li</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Qi, Ai, Sun, Ma, Kang, You and Li</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Toxoplasmosis is a zoonotic disease caused by the obligate intracellular protozoan parasite <italic>T. gondii</italic> which is widely prevalent in humans and animals worldwide. The diagnosis of toxoplasmosis and distinguishing acute or chronic <italic>T. gondii</italic> infections have utmost importance for humans and animals. The <italic>Tg</italic>SAG1, <italic>Tg</italic>GRA7, and <italic>Tg</italic>BAG1 proteins were used in the present study to develop the serological rSAG1-ELISA, rGRA7-ELISA and rBAG1-ELISA methods for the testing of <italic>T. gondii</italic> specific IgG and IgM antibodies and differentiating acute or chronic toxoplasmosis in 3733 animals, including Tibetan sheep, yaks, pigs, cows, cattle, horses, chickens, camels and donkeys from the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. The ELISA tests showed that the overall positivity of IgG antibody was 21.1% (786/3733), 15.3% (570/3733) and 18.2% (680/3733) for rSAG1-, rGRA7- and rBAG1-ELISA, respectively, and the positivity of IgM antibody was 11.8% (439/3733), 13.0% (486/3733) and 11.8% (442/3733) for rSAG1-, rGRA7- and rBAG1-ELISA, respectively. A total of 241 animals (6.5%) positive for all rSAG1-, rGRA7- and rBAG1-IgG were found in this study, and the 141 animals (3.8%) tested were anti-<italic>T. gondii</italic> IgM positive in all three ELISAs. Moreover, the 338, 284 and 377 animals were IgG positive in rSAG1 + rGRA7-, rBAG1 + rGRA7- and rSAG1 + rBAG1- ELISAs respectively, and the 346, 178 and 166 animals in rSAG1 + rGRA7-, rBAG1 + rGRA7- and rSAG1 + rBAG1-ELISAs were IgM positive respectively. The results confirmed that the application of SAG1, GRA7, and BAG1 recombinant antigens could successfully be used in the detection of specific IgG and IgM antibodies for distinguishing between acute or chronic <italic>T. gondii</italic> infections. It is inferred that the forms in which current animal species in the plateau area were infected with <italic>T. gondii</italic>, and the period of infection or the clinical manifestations of the current infections may be different. The present study provides substantial clinical evidence for the differential diagnosis of toxoplasmosis, and the classification of acute and chronic <italic>T. gondii</italic> infections.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>
<italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>SAG1</kwd>
<kwd>GRA7</kwd>
<kwd>BAG1</kwd>
<kwd>IgG</kwd>
<kwd>IgM</kwd>
<kwd>animals</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">2022-ZJ-956Q</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Natural Science Foundation of Qinghai<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100012579</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="3"/>
<table-count count="5"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="38"/>
<page-count count="11"/>
<word-count count="5797"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>Toxoplasmosis is a zoonotic disease caused by the obligate intracellular protozoan parasite <italic>T. gondii</italic> which is widely prevalent among humans and animals worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Robert-Gangneux and Dard&#xe9;, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Halonen and Weiss, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Matta et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Humans and animals can become the intermediate hosts of <italic>T. gondii</italic> through the ingestion of foods or water contaminated with oocysts of <italic>T. gondii</italic> shed with definitive host cats, or by eating undercooked or raw meats that contain tissue cysts of <italic>T. gondii</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Robert-Gangneux and Dard&#xe9;, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Halonen and Weiss, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Matta et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). <italic>T. gondii</italic> infections are characterized by significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients, such as individuals with AIDS, and serious congenital immune defects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Tenter et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>). Common toxoplasmosis among both weakened humans and animals leads to neurological, ocular, and systemic diseases or abortion, stillbirths, and abnormalities or becoming carrier (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Tenter et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>). Thus, the infection of <italic>T. gondii</italic> is divided into acute infection caused by oocysts (sporozoite form) or tachyzoites and chronic infection caused by bradyzoites in a long-term presence in the host tissues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Dubey et&#xa0;al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Lyons et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>). This chronic or latent infection generally exhibits a benign course in the immunocompetent population but can reactivate in people with weak immune systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Montoya and Liesenfeld, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Robert-Gangneux and Dard&#xe9;, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Saadatnia and Golkar, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Lourido, 2019</xref>). Therefore, the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis and distinguishing acute or chronic <italic>T. gondii</italic> infections are important for humans and animals.</p>
<p>The diagnosis of toxoplasmosis can be achieved using microscopic examination, <italic>in vitro</italic> culture, animal inoculation, and molecular and serological methods, while the common approach is the serological assays using <italic>T. gondii</italic> tachyzoite lysate antigen or specific antigens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Terkawi et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">D&#xf6;&#x15f;kaya et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). ELISAs are reliable serological tests that have been developed for the detection of <italic>T. gondii</italic> infection in animals, and the key component of these methods is the selection of antigens with strong specificity and high sensitivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Terkawi et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">D&#xf6;&#x15f;kaya et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). Recently, ELISA methods based on recombinant proteins have been developed to diagnose acute toxoplasmosis, such as surface-related proteins (SRS family), dense granule proteins (GRAs), and rhoptry proteins (ROPs) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Pietkiewicz et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Terkawi et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">D&#xf6;&#x15f;kaya et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Holec-G&#x105;sior et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Xicot&#xe9;ncatl-Garc&#xed;a et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Teimouri et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Among these <italic>T. gondii</italic> specific antigens, <italic>Tg</italic>SAG1 and <italic>Tg</italic>GRA7 are highlighted and have been widely used serologically to diagnose <italic>T. gondii</italic> infection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Terkawi et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Xicot&#xe9;ncatl-Garc&#xed;a et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Teimouri et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). <italic>Tg</italic>SAG1 is expressed on the surface of tachyzoites, which is a highly antigenic protein widely used for the diagnosis of <italic>T. gondii</italic> infection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Holec-G&#x105;sior et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Xicot&#xe9;ncatl-Garc&#xed;a et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Teimouri et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). <italic>Tg</italic>GRA7 is a secreted protein and expressed by sporozoites, tachyzoites and early-stage bradyzoites, and GRA7 produces a very strong antibody response in the acute phase of infection caused by all three parasite forms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Terkawi et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Xicot&#xe9;ncatl-Garc&#xed;a et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Teimouri et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Moreover, <italic>Tg</italic>BAG1 which is only expressed in bradyzoites, is a specific and characterized protein of the bradyzoite form and is a marker of <italic>T. gondii</italic> cyst infections (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">D&#xf6;&#x15f;kaya et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). The specific <italic>T. gondii</italic> antigens to sporozoite, tachyzoite and bradyzoite forms could be used to predict the infection stage.</p>
<p>Distinguishing between acute and chronic <italic>T. gondii</italic> infections could be achieved based on serological detection of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) data (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Montoya and Remington, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Dhakal et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Hence, the current study utilized the <italic>Tg</italic>SAG1, <italic>Tg</italic>GRA7, and <italic>Tg</italic>BAG1 proteins to develop serological rSAG1-, rGRA7- and rBAG1-ELISAs to test <italic>T. gondii</italic> specific IgG and IgM antibodies for distinguishing acute or chronic <italic>T. gondii</italic> infections in Tibetan sheep (<italic>Ovis aries</italic>), yaks (<italic>Bos grunniens</italic>), pigs (<italic>Sus domesticus</italic>), cows (<italic>Bos taurus</italic>), cattle (<italic>Bos taurus domestica</italic>), horses (<italic>Equus ferus caballus</italic>), chickens (<italic>Gallus gallus domesticus</italic>), camels (<italic>Camelus bactrianus</italic>) and donkeys (<italic>Equus asinus</italic>) from the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau area.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>2 Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<title>2.1 Serum collection from various animals in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau</title>
<p>In this study, a total of 3733 animal blood samples were collected from Tibetan sheep, yaks, pigs, cows, cattle, horses, chickens, camels and donkeys at 49 sampling sites in the 5 states and 2 cities in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau area (QTPA) with geographical coordinates of 31&#xb0;36&#x2032;-39&#xb0;19&#x2032; N and 89&#xb0;35&#x2032;-103&#xb0;04&#x2032; E from June 2021 to February 2022 as shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1">
<bold>Figure S1</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S1</bold>
</xref>. Centrifugation of the fresh blood from different animals was performed at 5000 rpm for 10 minutes. The serum from the supernatant was transferred to new collection tubes. After excluding the unqualified serum (such as hemolytic samples), animal serum samples were frozen and stored at -80&#xb0;C until assayed. All procedures were carried out according to the ethical guidelines of Qinghai University.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<title>2.2 Cloning and expression of <italic>T. gondii</italic> specific-SAG1, GRA7 and BAG1 proteins</title>
<p>Amino acid sequence alignment and phylogenetic analyses for <italic>Tg</italic>SAG1, <italic>Tg</italic>GRA7, and <italic>Tg</italic>BAG1 with the related cycle-forming organizations (<italic>Neospora caninum</italic>, <italic>Besnoitia species</italic>, <italic>Sarcocystis</italic> species, etc.) were constructed using the maximum lifestyle statistical method and bootstrap analysis with 500 replications in MEGA7, and the sequences included <italic>T. gondii</italic> SAG1 (AFO54849.1), <italic>N. caninum</italic> SAG1 (AAD25091.1), <italic>Sarcocystis neurona</italic> SAG1 (AAK40366.1), <italic>T. gondii</italic> GRA7 (ABE69193.1), <italic>N. caninum</italic> GRA7 (AFB77190.1), <italic>Besnoitia besnoiti</italic> GRA7 (XP_029218567.1), <italic>T. gondii</italic> BAG1 (XP_002365116.1), <italic>N. caninum</italic> BAG1 (BAI44436.1), and <italic>B. besnoiti</italic> BAG1 (XP_029221932.1). The pGEX-4T-3-SAG1 and pGEX-4T-3-GRA7 plasmids from previous studies were used to produce recombinant <italic>Tg</italic>SAG1-GST and <italic>Tg</italic>GRA7-GST proteins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Kimbita et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Masatani et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). The <italic>BAG1</italic> gene (<italic>Toxoplasma</italic> Genomics Resource TGME49_259020) was amplified by PCR from the cDNA of <italic>T. gondii</italic>. The primers that included a BamHI site (underlined) in the forward primer 5&#x2019;- CGC GGATCC ATG GCG CCG TCA GCA TCG CAT -3&#x2019; and a NotI site (underlined) in the reverse primer 5&#x2019;- ATAAGAAT GCGGCCGC CTA CTT CAC GCT GAT TTG TTG CT-3&#x2019; for the <italic>BAG1</italic> gene were used. The PCR products were digested with BamH I and Not I, and inserted into the pGEX-4T-1 plasmid vector treated with the same restriction enzymes (Roche, Switzerland). The recombinant pGEX-4T-1 empty vector, pGEX-4T-3-SAG1, pGEX-4T-3-GRA7, and pGEX-4T-1-BAG1 were expressed as glutathione s-transferase (GST) fusion proteins in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> BL21(DE3) (New England BioLabs, USA) and purified with Glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, USA) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. The final concentrations of GST, r<italic>Tg</italic>SAG1-GST, r<italic>Tg</italic>GRA7-GST, and r<italic>Tg</italic>BAG1-GST proteins were measured with a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) before being used.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<title>2.3 Development of indirect ELISAs based on rSAG1, rGRA7 and rBAG1 proteins</title>
<p>In this study, the r<italic>Tg</italic>SAG1-GST, r<italic>Tg</italic>GRA7-GST, and r<italic>Tg</italic>BAG1-GST proteins were used to establish the indirect rSAG1-ELISA, rGRA7-ELISA and rBAG1-ELISA to detect both IgG and IgM antibodies against <italic>T. gondii</italic> in the 3733 animals, including the 904 in Tibetan sheep, 752 in yaks, 496 in cows, 456 in pigs, 451 in cattle, 389 in horses, 199 in chickens, 49 in camels and 37 in donkeys. Briefly, the 1 &#x3bc;g/mL recombinant proteins were diluted in coating buffer (0.05 M carbonate-bicarbonate, pH 9.6). The animal sera were diluted by 1:100, and the secondary antibodies of anti-bovine, cow, sheep, horse, pig, chicken, donkey, and camel IgG or IgM as listed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Table S2</bold>
</xref>, were diluted 1:3000-4000. The ABTS, (2,2&#x2019;-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)) substrate, was used to show the OD 415 nm values. The soluble GST protein was used as the control under consistent experimental conditions with three ELISAs. In this study, the 5 positive and negative mouse sera for anti-<italic>T. gondii</italic>, <italic>Neospora caninum</italic> and <italic>Sarcocystis gigantea</italic> were used to assess the specificity of IgG-ELISA and IgM-ELISA based on GRA7, SAG1, BAG1, and GST proteins, respectively. Moreover, the coated <italic>Tg</italic>GRA7, <italic>Tg</italic>SAG1, <italic>Tg</italic>BAG1, and GST proteins at 2, 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, and 0.0625 &#x3bc;g/mL, or anti-<italic>T. gondii</italic> positive and negative sera diluted 1:100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400, 12800 and 25600, were used to develop the IgG-ELISAs and IgM-ELISAs for analyzing the sensitivity of the current tests, respectively. Moreover, the positive and negative animal serum samples for <italic>T. gondii</italic> IgG and IgM antibodies confirmed by the commercial ID Screen<sup>&#xae;</sup> Toxoplasmosis Indirect Multi-species ELISA kit (ID.vet, France) and our previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Li et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>) were used as controls. All controls were re-confirmed using the ELISA tests based on tachyzoite and bradyzoite lysate antigens under the current protocol. Furthermore, the commercial kit (ID Screen<sup>&#xae;</sup> Toxoplasmosis Indirect Multi-species ELISA, ID.vet, Grabels, France) was used to confirm the currently determined seropositive and seronegative samples from at least one animal species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<title>2.4 Data analysis</title>
<p>For the resulting judgment, the cut-off points were calculated as the mean values of OD 415 nm for the negative sera (including the serum samples of 30 Tibetan sheep, 30 yaks, 30 cows, 30 pigs, 30 cattle, 20 horses, 20 chickens, 5 camels, and 5 donkeys) kept in our lab (Qinghai University, Xining, China) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Li et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>) plus three times the standard deviations of OD 415 nm values of these negative controls: the mean (X) and standard deviation (SD) of the negative control results were calculated, and the X+3SD was the cut-off values. The OD 415 values of the tested animals were greater than the respective cut-off values assessed as positive. For the weak positive samples with similar cut-off values or lighter colors were repeated with the second doubtful result being treated as negative samples. To graph and analyze the data, GraphPad Prism 8 software (GraphPad Software Inc., USA) was used. The prevalence and 95% confidence intervals per pathogen species were calculated using the OpenEpi program (<uri xlink:href="http://www.openepi.com/Proportion/Proportion.htm">http://www.openepi.com/Proportion/Proportion.htm</uri>). The chi-squared test was used to compare the proportions of determined seropositivity in animals from different regions. The differences were considered to be statistically significant when the resulting <italic>P</italic>-values were &lt; 0.05.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<title>3 Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<title>3.1 Establishment of rSAG1-ELISA, rGRA7-ELISA and rBAG1-ELISA tests</title>
<p>In this study, the amino acid sequence alignment analysis was performed on the SAG1, GRA7, and BAG1 proteins of <italic>T. gondii</italic> with the related cyst-forming organisms (<italic>Neospora caninum</italic>, <italic>Besnoitia</italic> species, <italic>Sarcocystis</italic> species, etc.), and shared the homology of 5.0-86.8% (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF2">
<bold>Figure S2</bold>
</xref>
<bold>).</bold> The r<italic>Tg</italic>SAG1-GST, r<italic>Tg</italic>GRA7-GST, and r<italic>Tg</italic>BAG1-GST proteins were expressed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>), and used to establish the indirect rSAG1-ELISA, rGRA7-ELISA and rBAG1-ELISA methods for identifying the carrier animals of <italic>T. gondii</italic> specific-IgG and IgM antibodies, and comparing the differences among three antigens in the serodiagnosis of animal toxoplasmosis in various animals from the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>The recombinant SAG1, GRA7 and BAG1 proteins of <italic>T. gondii</italic> was expressed. SDS-PAGE analysis showed the rSAG1, rGRA7, rBAG1 and GST proteins.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcimb-12-1029768-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The IgG-ELISAs (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF3">
<bold>Figure S3A</bold>
</xref>) and IgM-ELISAs (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF3">
<bold>Figure S3B</bold>
</xref>) based on <italic>Tg</italic>GRA7, <italic>Tg</italic>SAG1, <italic>Tg</italic>BAG1, and GST proteins were performed to detect mouse anti-<italic>T. gondii</italic>, <italic>N. caninum</italic>, and <italic>S. gigantea</italic> positive sera to analyze the specificity of the current ELISA tests in this study respectively. The results showed that GRA7-, SAG1-, and BAG1-ELISAs only reacted with the positive sera of <italic>T. gondii</italic> but did not respond to the positive sera of <italic>N. caninum</italic> and <italic>S. gigantea</italic> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF3">
<bold>Figure S3</bold>
</xref>). The GST protein did not react with any serum (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF3">
<bold>Figure S3</bold>
</xref>). In addition, the results show that the current ELISA reactions could occur when the concentration of coated proteins was very low under a positive serum dilution of 1:100 (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF4">
<bold>Figure S4</bold>
</xref>). Moreover, the OD values at the serum dilution of 1:800-6400 were still greater than the cut-off values (calculated using the OD values of negative controls), while GST protein did not demonstrate any response (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF5">
<bold>Figure S5</bold>
</xref>). These results suggest that the detection methods employed were highly specific and sensitive.</p>
<p>The 5-30 negative sera confirmed by our previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Li et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>) and the commercial kits were used to detect OD 415 values in the different animal species, and calculate the cut-off values for IgG and IgM determination in Tibetan sheep, yaks, cows, pigs, cattle, horses, chickens, camels, and donkeys as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2A, B</bold>
</xref>. The glutathione s-transferase (GST)-ELISA tests showed no-reaction with <italic>T. gondii</italic> positive sera under the same experimental conditions (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF3">
<bold>Figure S3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Establishment of rSAG1-ELISA, rGRA7-ELISA and rBAG1-ELISA tests and calculating the cut-off values for <italic>T. gondii</italic> IgG <bold>(A)</bold> and IgM <bold>(B)</bold> antibodies.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcimb-12-1029768-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<title>3.2 Detection of <italic>T. gondii</italic> IgG and IgM antibodies in animals</title>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, rSAG1-ELISA, rGRA7-ELISA and rBAG1-ELISA were used to detect <italic>T. gondii</italic> IgG and IgM antibodies in the same animals. The results showed that the overall positivity of IgG antibody was 21.1% (786/3733), 15.3% (570/3733) and 18.2% (680/3733) for rSAG1-ELISA, rGRA7-ELISA and rBAG1-ELISA respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3A, B</bold>
</xref>), and the 11.8% (439/3733), 13.0% (486/3733) and 11.8% (442/3733) of the animals were IgM antibody-positive for rSAG1-ELISA, rGRA7-ELISA and rBAG1-ELISA respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3C, D</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Detection of <italic>T. gondii</italic> IgG <bold>(A, B)</bold> and IgM <bold>(C, D)</bold> antibodies in various animals in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau by the indirect ELISA methods based on SAG1, GRA7 and BAG1 antigens in this study.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcimb-12-1029768-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Seroprevalence of specific-<italic>T. gondii</italic> IgG and IgM antibodies in various animals.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Animal</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">No. tested</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">IgG-SAG1 (%, 95% CI)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">IgG-GRA7 (%, 95% CI)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">IgG-BAG1 (%, 95% CI)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">IgM-SAG1 (%, 95% CI)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">IgM-GRA7 (%, 95% CI)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">IgM-BAG1 (%, 95% CI)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Tibetan sheep</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">904</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">163 (18.0, 15.5-20.5)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">88 (9.7, 7.8-11.7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">37 (4.1, 2.8-5.4)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13 (1.4, 0.7-2.2)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6 (0.7, 0.1-1.2)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11 (1.2, 0.5-1.9)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Yak</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">752</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16 (2.1, 1.1-3.2)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13 (1.7, 0.8-2.7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">113 (15.0, 12.5-17.6)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13 (1.7, 0.8-2.7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4 (0.5, 0.0-1.1)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">31 (4.1, 2.7-5.5)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Cow</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">496</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (0.2, 0.2-0.6)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (0.2, 0.2-0.6)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">100 (20.2, 16.6-23.7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (0.6, 0.1-1.3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11 (2.2, 0.9-3.5)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">118 (23.8, 20.0-27.5)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Pig</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">456</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">397 (87.1, 84.0-90.1)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">297 (65.1, 60.8-69.5)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">315 (69.1, 64.8-73.3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (0.4, 0.2-1.0)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (0.2, 0.2-0.6)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Cattle</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">451</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9 (2.0. 0.7-3.3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7 (1.6, 0.4-2.7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6 (1.3, 0.3-2.4)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11 (2.4, 1.0-3.9)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18 (4.0, 2.2-5.8)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">36 (8.0, 5.5-10.5)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Horse</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">389</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (0.5, 0.2-1.2)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4 (1.0, 0.0-2.0)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">303 (77.9, 73.8-82.0)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">337 (86.8, 83.3-90.0)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">163 (41.9, 37.0-46.8)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Chicken</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">199</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">139 (69.8, 63.5-76.2)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">128 (64.3, 57.7-71.0)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">56 (28.1, 21.9-34.4)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">96 (48.2, 41.3-55.2)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">108 (54.3, 47.3-61.2)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">82 (41.2, 34.4-48.0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Camel</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">49</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">33 (67.3, 54.2-80.5)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10 (20.4, 9.1-31.7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19 (38.8, 25.1-52.4)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">/</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">/</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">/</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Donkey</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">37</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28 (75.7, 61.9-89.5)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24 (64.9, 49.5-80.2)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30 (81.1, 68.5-93.7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">/</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">/</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">/</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Total</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3733</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">786 (21.1, 19.7-22.4)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">570 (15.3, 14.1-16.4)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">680 (18.2, 17.0-19.5)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">439 (11.8, 10.7-12.8)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">486 (13.0, 11.9-14.1)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">442 (11.8, 10.8-12.9)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>%, Prevalence. 95% CI, 95% Confidence Interval./, no tested.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>In ELISA tests, the pig was the most prevalent animal in both rSAG1-ELISA and rGRA7-ELISA and the donkey was the most prevalent animal in rBAG1-ELISA for IgG positivity, while horses had the highest IgM positivity according to all three methods (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Specifically, our results revealed that the animals with the next highest IgG positivity rates in the rSAG1-tests were donkeys, chickens, camels, Tibetan sheep, yaks, cattle and cows; those with the next highest rates in the rGRA7- tests were donkeys, chickens, camels, Tibetan sheep, yaks, cattle, horses and cows; and those with the next highest rates in the rBAG1-IgG tests were pigs, camels, chickens, cows, yaks, Tibetan sheep, cattle and horses. However, the results showed that the animals with the next highest positivity rates of IgM antibodies in the rSAG1- tests were followed by chickens, cattle, yaks, Tibetan sheep and cows; those in the rGRA7- tests were followed by chickens, cattle, cows, Tibetan sheep, yaks and pigs; those in the rBAG1-IgG tests were followed by chickens, cows, cattle, yaks, Tibetan sheep and pigs. Moreover, the results of the analysis of the positivity of animals for both IgG and IgM antibodies based on the same antigen, revealed that 2.0%, 2.5% and 1.5% of the animals exhibited both IgG and IgM positivity in the rSAG1-ELISA, rGRA7-ELISA and rBAG1-ELISA tests, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Animals with seropositive for both IgG and IgM antibodies in rSAG1-ELISA, rGRA7-ELISA and rBAG1-ELISA tests.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Animal</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">No. tested</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">rSAG1-ELISA (%, 95% CI)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">rGRA7-ELISA (%, 95% CI)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">rBAG1-ELISA (%, 95% CI)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Tibetan sheep</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">904</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (0.3, 0.0-0.7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4 (0.4, 0.0-0.9)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (0.2, 0.1-0.5)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Yak</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">752</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7 (0.9, 0.2-1.6)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Cow</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">496</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">44 (8.9, 6.4-11.4)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Pig</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">456</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (0.4, 0.2-1.0)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Cattle</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">451</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (0.4, 0.2-1.1)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Horse</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">389</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (0.3, 0.2-0.8)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (0.3, 0.2-0.8)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Chicken</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">199</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">71 (35.7, 29.0-42.3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">83 (41.7, 34.9-48.6)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (1.5, 0.2-3.2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Camel</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">49</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">/</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">/</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">/</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Donkey</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">37</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">/</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">/</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">/</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Total</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3733</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">74 (2.0, 1.5-2.4)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">92 (2.5, 2.0-3.0)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">57 (1.5, 1.1-1.9)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>%, Prevalence. 95% CI, 95% Confidence Interval./, no tested.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>In order to confirm the current ELISAs, the 50 seropositive and 50 seronegative samples determined with the current IgG-ELISA based on SAG1 in pigs were selected to compare with the commercial kits based on <italic>Tg</italic>SAG1 protein. The results showed an 82% match rate between the kits and the current SAG1-IgG ELISA, including a 68% match rate for positive and 92% for negative samples (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">
<bold>Table S3</bold>
</xref>). According to these results (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">
<bold>Table S3</bold>
</xref>), we calculated that the serological <italic>T. gondii</italic> IgG-ELISA assay based on the SAG1 protein established in pigs in this study had a sensitivity of 89.7% and a specificity of 75.4%.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<title>3.3 Analysis of animal co-positive for rSAG1-ELISA, rGRA7-ELISA and rBAG1-ELISA</title>
<p>A total of 241 animals (6.5%) with all rSAG1-, rGRA7- and rBAG1-IgG positivity were found in this study (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>), and the 141 animals (3.8%) tested which included 130 horses and 11 chickens were anti-<italic>T. gondii</italic> IgM positive in all three ELISAs (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). Moreover, a total of 338, 284 and 377 animals were IgG positive in the rSAG1 + rGRA7-, rBAG1 + rGRA7- and rSAG1 + rBAG1- ELISAs respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>), and 346, 178 and 166 animals in the rSAG1 + rGRA7-, rBAG1 + rGRA7- and rSAG1 + rBAG1-ELISAs were IgM positive respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). Furthermore, the 1796 animals (48.1%) were positive animals for IgG and IgM antibodies in at least one specific <italic>T. gondii</italic> antigen, and 29.8% of animals (1111/3733) were IgG-positive for at least one specific <italic>T. gondii</italic> antigen and a total of 825 animals (22.1%) were IgM-positive for at least one antigen (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">
<bold>Table&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Specific-<italic>T. gondii</italic> IgG-positive animals based on among SAG1, GRA7 and BAG1 proteins.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Animal</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">No. tested</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Both IgG-SAG1 and IgG-GRA7 positive (%, 95% CI)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Both IgG-BAG1 and IgG-GRA7 positive (%, 95% CI)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Both IgG-SAG1 and IgG-BAG1 positive (%, 95% CI)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Among IgG-SAG1, -GRA7 and-BAG1 positive (%, 95% CI)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Tibetan sheep</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">904</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28 (3.1, 2.0-4.2)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5 (0.6, 0.1-1.0)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10 (1.1, 0.4-1.8)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (0.2, 0.1-0.5)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Yak</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">752</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (0.1, 0.1-0.4)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (0.4, 0.1-0.8)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Cow</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">496</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Pig</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">456</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">187 (41.0, 36.5-45.5)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">208 (45.6, 41.0-50.2)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">279 (61.2, 56.7-65.7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">182 (39.9, 35.4-44.4)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Cattle</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">451</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (0.2, 0.2-0.7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Horse</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">389</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Chicken</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">199</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">98 (49.2, 42.3-56.2)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">47 (23.6, 17.7-29.5)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">46 (23.1, 17.3-29.0)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">39 (19.6, 14.1-25.1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Camel</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">49</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7 (14.3, 4.5-24.1)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4 (8.2, 0.5-15.8)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15 (30.6, 17.7-43.5)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (6.1, 0.6-12.8)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Donkey</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">37</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18 (48.6, 32.5-64.8)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19 (51.4, 35.2-67.5)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23 (62.2, 46.5-77.8)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15 (40.5, 24.7-56.4)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Total</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3733</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">338 (9.1, 8.1-10.0)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">284 (7.6, 6.8-8.5)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">377 (10.1, 9.1-11.1)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">241 (6.5, 5.7-7.2)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>%, Prevalence. 95% CI, 95% Confidence Interval.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Specific-<italic>T. gondii</italic> IgM-positive animals based on among SAG1, GRA7 and BAG1 proteins.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Animal</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">No. tested</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Both IgM-SAG1 and IgM-GRA7 positive (%, 95% CI)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Both IgM-BAG1 and IgM-GRA7 positive (%, 95% CI)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Both IgM-SAG1 and IgM-BAG1 positive (%, 95% CI)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Among IgM-SAG1, -GRA7 and-BAG1 positive (%, 95% CI)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Tibetan sheep</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">904</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Yak</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">752</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Cow</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">496</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (0.6, 0.1-1.3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (0.4, 0.2-1.0)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Pig</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">456</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Cattle</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">451</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (0.2, 0.2-0.7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Horse</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">389</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">275 (70.7, 66.2-75.2)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">145 (37.3, 32.5-42.1)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">143 (36.8, 32.0-41.6)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">130 (33.4, 28.7-38.1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Chicken</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">199</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">71 (35.7, 29.0-42.3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30 (15.1, 10.1-20.0)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20 (10.1, 5.9-14.2)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11 (5.5, 2.4-8.7)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Camel</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">49</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">/</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">/</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">/</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">/</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Donkey</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">37</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">/</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">/</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">/</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">/</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Total</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3733</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">346 (9.3, 8.3-10.2)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">178 (4.8, 4.1-5.5)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">166 (4.4, 3.8-5.1)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">141 (3.8, 3.2-4.4)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>%, Prevalence. 95% CI, 95% Confidence Interval./, no tested.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Animals with seropositive for at least one specific-<italic>T. gondii</italic> antigen in animals.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Animal</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">No. tested</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Positive animals for at least one specific-<italic>T. gondii</italic> antigen (%, 95% CI)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">IgG positive animals for at least one specific antigen (%, 95% CI)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">IgM positive animals for at least one specific antigen (%, 95% CI)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Tibetan sheep</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">904</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">260 (28.8, 25.8-31.7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">245 (27.1, 24.2-30.0)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30 (3.3, 2.2-4.5)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Yak</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">752</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">176 (23.4, 20.4-26.4)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">137 (18.2, 15.5-21.0)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">47 (6.3, 4.5-8.0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Cow</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">496</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">182 (36.7, 32.5-40.9)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">102 (20.6, 17.0-24.1)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">129 (26.0, 22.1-29.9)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Pig</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">456</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">453 (99.3, 98.6-100.1)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">453 (99.3, 98.6-100.1)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (0.7, 0.1-1.4)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Cattle</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">451</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">82 (18.2, 14.6-21.7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21 (4.7, 2.7-6.6)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">64 (14.2, 11.0-17.4)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Horse</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">389</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">372 (95.6,93.6-97.7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6 (1.5, 0.3-2.8)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">373 (95.9, 93.9-97.9)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Chicken</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">199</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">195 (98.0, 96.0-99.9)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">171 (85.9, 81.1-90.8)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">179 (89.9, 85.8-94.1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Camel</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">49</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">39 (79.6, 68.3-90.9)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">39 (79.6, 68.3-90.9)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">/</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Donkey</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">37</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">37 (100.0, 100.0)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">37 (100.0, 100.0)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">/</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Total</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3733</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1796 (48.1, 46.5-49.7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1111 (29.8, 28.3-31.2)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">825 (22.1, 20.8-23.4)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>%, Prevalence. 95% CI, 95% Confidence Interval./, no tested.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<title>3.4 Analysis of the effect of altitude on the animal seropositive for <italic>T. gondii-</italic>specific antibodies</title>
<p>To determine the influence of altitude on the positivity of <italic>T. gondii</italic> IgG and IgM antibodies, all animals were differentiated into three groups, including 2000-3000, 3000-4000, and 4000-5000&#xa0;m altitudes (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM4">
<bold>Table S4</bold>
</xref>). The results revealed that significant differences (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05) were found in Tibetan sheep, cattle, yaks and horses from different altitudes (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM4">
<bold>Table S4</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>4 Discussion</title>
<p>In this study, serological ELISA diagnostic methods based on <italic>Tg</italic>SAG1, <italic>Tg</italic>GRA7 and <italic>Tg</italic>BAG1 antigens present in the different <italic>T. gondii</italic> forms were established to analyze the positivity rates of specific <italic>T. gondii</italic> IgG and IgM antibodies in Tibetan sheep, yaks, pigs, cows, cattle, horses, chickens, camels and donkeys from the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. The differences in IgG or IgM antibody levels in the serum of the same animal were detected among rSAG1-ELISA, rGRA7-ELISA and rBAG1-ELISA. Moreover, there were also large differences in the overall positivity rates of antibodies detected by the three antigens in 3733 serum samples. Therefore, we infer that the parasite forms in which current animal species in the QTPA were infected with <italic>T. gondii</italic>, and the period of infection or the clinical manifestations of the current infection may be different.</p>
<p>Usually, the animals are infected with <italic>T. gondii</italic> by accidentally ingesting oocysts and tissue cysts while eating or drinking (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Dubey, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Cenci-Goga et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Hill and Dubey, 2013</xref>). Sporozoites and bradyzoites were released after the ingestion of oocysts or tissue cysts, invaded the intestinal cells, and quickly differentiated into tachyzoites in 12 and 18 hours, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Dubey, 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Dubey et&#xa0;al., 1997</xref>). When subjected to strong immune resistance, tachyzoites will transform into bradyzoites to form tissue cysts that persist in the body for a long time. Therefore, throughout the transition process, the bodies of humans and animals will produce specific antibodies against the antigens of the different forms of <italic>T. gondii</italic>. Current specific <italic>T. gondii</italic> antigens used, including SAG1 expressed in the tachyzoite form, GRA7 expressed in sporozoite, tachyzoite and bradyzoite forms, and BAG1 expressed in the bradyzoite form, should be markers for the different parasite stages.</p>
<p>During the natural course of infections, sporozoite- and bradyzoite-specific immune responses are the markers for the diagnosis of cases of firstly acute toxoplasmosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">D&#xf6;&#x15f;kaya et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). Tachyzoite presence indicates that the animal is suffering from acute <italic>T. gondii</italic> infection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Lyons et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>). Moreover, during <italic>T. gondii</italic> infections, the positivity for IgM antibody is proposed to be a marker of acute infection due to the occurrence of IgM antibody within days to a couple of weeks, and IgG antibodies are often interpreted as rising to protective levels after infection and remaining detectable for years, while the positivity for both IgG and IgM antibodies resulted is generally considered to indicate chronic reactivated cases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Kimbita et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">D&#xf6;&#x15f;kaya et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Dhakal et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). IgM antibodies may be detected in humans or animals for a long time following primary <italic>T. gondii</italic> infections (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Del Bono et&#xa0;al., 1989</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Fricker-Hidalgo et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Dhakal et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Ybanez et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Teimouri et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>), and the natural IgM antibody may interact with parasite antigens in the absence of the <italic>Toxoplasma</italic> infection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Potasman et&#xa0;al., 1986</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Sensini et&#xa0;al., 1996</xref>.; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Liesenfeld et&#xa0;al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Dhakal et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Teimouri et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). In the current study, the application of specific antigens from different <italic>T. gondii</italic> forms may serve as reliable laboratory tools to confirm the doubts raised by these traditional methods. For the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in this study, the <italic>Tg</italic>SAG1, <italic>Tg</italic>GRA7, and <italic>Tg</italic>BAG1 antigens from the different parasite forms were used to further analyze both IgG and IgM antibodies. Therefore, these present positive results may represent: the IgG antibody test, rSAG1 + rGRA7 positivity indicates that animals have been infected or are infected currently by tachyzoites, rBAG1 + rGRA7 positivity indicates that animals have been infected by bradyzoites or present tissue cysts, and rSAG1 + rGRA7 + rBAG1 indicates that animals have been infected by parasites or are chronic infections of <italic>T. gondii</italic> currently. The rSAG1 + rGRA7 positivity in IgM antibody tests indicates that the animal is suffering from acute toxoplasmosis caused by tachyzoites; rBAG1 + rGRA7 positivity indicates that the animal is being infected and is in the acute stage of infection caused by bradyzoites; rSAG1 + rGRA7 + rBAG1 indicates that the animal is suffering from acute toxoplasmosis caused by sporozoites, tachyzoites or bradyzoites.</p>
<p>In this work, although it is shown that Tibetan sheep, yaks, cows, and cattle were overall low both for <italic>T. gondii</italic> IgG and IgM positivity, there was no significant difference among rSAG1-, rGRA7-, and rBAG1-ELISAs. These results indicate that <italic>T. gondii</italic> may be infected at low titers in the animals collected in this study. However, the positive rates of 4.1% in yaks, 23.8% in cows and 8.0% in cattle in rBAG1-IgM were found, suggesting the possibility of elevated IgM antibody levels due to vertical infection or sexual transmission in these animal populations cannot be ruled out (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Montoya and Remington, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Lopes et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Paquet et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Beder and Esenkaya Ta&#x15f;bent, 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Interestingly, three current ELISAs were used to test the serum samples of camels, horses and donkeys. It was found that all ELISAs revealed more than 20.4% IgG positivity in camels and 64.9% IgG positivity in donkeys. However, the positivity rates of the three IgG tests in horses were almost zero, but the positivity rates of IgM were 77.9% for rSAG1-, 86.8% for rGRA7- and 41.9% for rBAG1-ELISA. Moreover, in horse testing, 70.7%, 37.3%, 36.8% and 33.4% high IgM positivity was found in the rSAG1 + rGRA7-, rBAG1 + rGRA7-, rSAG1 + rBAG1- and rSAG1 + rGRA7 + rBAG1-ELISAs, respectively. Therefore, horses in the current study may be suffering from sporozoites, tachyzoites or bradyzoite reactivated-caused acute <italic>Toxoplasma</italic> infection, while camels and donkeys may have experienced acute toxoplasmosis or become long-term carriers of tissue cysts. At the same time, such a high positivity rate of IgG or IgM also indicates that the grass or water for horses, donkeys and camels in the sampling area has been polluted by oocysts excluded by wild or stray cats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Tenter et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Cenci-Goga et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Robert-Gangneux and Dard&#xe9;, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Saadatnia and Golkar, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Halonen and Weiss, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Lourido, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Matta et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Furthermore, the rSAG1-ELISA, rGRA7-ELISA and rBAG1-ELISA tests showed high IgG positivity in current pigs, but for IgM antibody, only three pigs presented IgM positivity (two pigs for IgM-GRA7- and one pig for IgM-BAG1-ELISA), suggesting that current pigs may become long-term carriers of tissue cysts of <italic>T. gondii</italic>. Moreover, the seropositive and seronegative samples based on the current SAG1-IgG in pigs were selected to perform the comparative analysis with the commercial ELISA kits based on <italic>Tg</italic>SAG1 protein. The results revealed an 82% match rate with the commercial kits, and a sensitivity of 89.7% and a specificity of 75.4% of the serological <italic>T. gondii</italic> IgG-ELISA assay based on the SAG1 protein established in pigs in this study. These provide confirmations for currently establishing IgG-ELISA and IgM-ELISA based on the proteins that could apply for the serodiagnosis of <italic>T. gondii</italic> infections.</p>
<p>However, it was found that the results were different from those of other animal species in the toxoplasmosis detection of chickens, that is, the positivity rates of IgG and IgM were very high in all tests. This result demonstrates the fact that acute toxoplasmosis occurred in chickens, as well as the soil, water and food (containing animal meats with oocysts) in the chicken&#x2019;s surroundings are contaminated with oocysts. Moreover, the chicken&#x2019;s habit of pecking the soil may lead to greater exposure to the threat of oocysts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Certainly, in areas with the prevalence of toxoplasmosis, the definitive-host cats, especially stray cats, play a key role in frequently exposing other animals to the infectious source and causing <italic>T. gondii</italic> infections in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Xia et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>In conclusion, the current study confirmed that the application of <italic>Tg</italic>SAG1, <italic>Tg</italic>GRA7, and <italic>Tg</italic>BAG1 recombinant antigens could successfully be used in the detection of specific IgG and IgM antibodies for the serodiagnosis of <italic>T. gondii</italic> infections in Tibetan sheep, yaks, pigs, cows, cattle, horses, chickens, camels and donkeys from the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. However, the limitations of the present study include the lack of application of specific antigens of sporozoites and testing of IgG avidity. Future studies need to develop serodetection tests for IgG and IgM against sporozoite antigens and should also test definitive host cats that live around these animals in this plateau area.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="ethics-statement">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The animal study was reviewed and approved by Ethics Committee of Qinghai University (License number: SL-2021061). Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>TQ: Collection of animal samples, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing-review and editing. JA: Investigation. YS: Writing-review and editing. HM: Investigation. MK: Writing-review and editing. XY: Collection of animal samples. JL: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Qinghai Province of China (grant numbers 2022-ZJ-956Q).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>This is a short text to acknowledge the contributions of specific colleagues, institutions, or agencies that aided the efforts of the authors.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2022.1029768/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2022.1029768/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_2.docx" id="SM2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_3.docx" id="SM3" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_4.docx" id="SM4" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_1.tif" id="SF1" mimetype="image/tiff">
<label>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>The geographical location and quantity of sampling in various animals in Qinghai province for serodiagnosis of toxoplasmosis based on <italic>T. gondii</italic>-specific SAG1, GRA7 and BAG1 proteins. The graph shows the average altitudes of sampling sites in the 5 states and 2 cities from which the samples were collected and the number of samples of the different animals in each region. HX, Haixi Mongol and Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture. YS, Yushu Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture. HB, Haibei Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture. HN, Hainan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture. HUN, Huangnan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture. GL: Guoluo Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture. XN, Xining city. HD, Haidong city.</p>
</caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_2.tif" id="SF2" mimetype="image/tiff">
<label>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Amino acid sequence alignment and phylogenetic analyses for <italic>Tg</italic>SAG1, <italic>Tg</italic>GRA7, and <italic>Tg</italic>BAG1 with the related cycle-forming organizations. The sequences included <italic>T. gondii</italic> SAG1 (AFO54849.1), <italic>N. caninum</italic> SAG1 (AAD25091.1), <italic>Sarcocystis neurona</italic> SAG1 (AAK40366.1), <italic>T. gondii</italic> GRA7 (ABE69193.1), <italic>N. caninum</italic> GRA7 (AFB77190.1), <italic>Besnoitia besnoiti</italic> GRA7 (XP_029218567.1), <italic>T. gondii</italic> BAG1 (XP_002365116.1), <italic>N. caninum</italic> BAG1 (BAI44436.1), and <italic>B. besnoiti</italic> BAG1 (XP_029221932.1).</p>
</caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_3.tif" id="SF3" mimetype="image/tiff">
<label>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>The specificity of the current ELISA tests was established in this study. IgG-ELISAs <bold>(A)</bold> and IgM-ELISAs <bold>(B)</bold> based on <italic>Tg</italic>GRA7, <italic>Tg</italic>SAG1, <italic>Tg</italic>BAG1, and GST proteins were performed using mouse anti-<italic>T. gondii</italic>, <italic>N. caninum</italic>, and <italic>S. gigantea</italic> positive sera. At least 5 positive sera were used. The coating concentration of the proteins was 1 &#x3bc;g/mL, and the serum dilutions were 1:100. The results showed that GRA7-, SAG1-, and BAG1-ELISAs only reacted with the positive sera of <italic>T. gondii</italic> but did not respond to the positive sera of <italic>N. caninum</italic> and <italic>S. gigantea</italic>. The GST protein did not react with any serum. <italic>Tg</italic>, <italic>T. gondii</italic>. <italic>Nc</italic>, <italic>N. caninum</italic>. <italic>Sg</italic>, <italic>S. gigantea</italic>.</p>
</caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_4.tif" id="SF4" mimetype="image/tiff">
<label>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>The sensitivity assay of the protein concentration under a positive serum dilution of 1:100. In this study, the coated <italic>Tg</italic>GRA7, <italic>Tg</italic>SAG1, <italic>Tg</italic>BAG1, and GST proteins were diluted 2, 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, and 0.0625 &#x3bc;g/mL, and IgG-ELISAs and IgM-ELISAs were developed at a positive serum dilution of 1:100, 200, 400, 800, 1600 and 3200. The 5 positive mouse sera were used. The results show that the reactions could also occur when the concentration of coated proteins was very low under a positive serum dilution of 1:100. P, positive sera. N, negative sera.</p>
</caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_5.tif" id="SF5" mimetype="image/tiff">
<label>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>The sensitivity assay for the serum dilution. Here, mouse anti-<italic>T. gondii</italic> positive and negative sera were diluted with 1:100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400, 12800 and 25600 for IgG-ELISAs and IgM-ELISAs based on 1 &#x3bc;g/mL <italic>Tg</italic>GRA7, <italic>Tg</italic>SAG1, <italic>Tg</italic>BAG1, and GST proteins. The 5 positive or negative mouse sera were used. The results showed that the OD values at the serum dilution 1:800-6400 were still greater than the cut-off values (calculated using the OD values of negative controls), while GST protein did not show any response.</p>
</caption>
</supplementary-material>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Beder</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Esenkaya Ta&#x15f;bent</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>General features and laboratory diagnosis of <italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic> infection</article-title>. <source>Turkiye. Parazitol. Derg.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>94</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>101</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4274/tpd.galenos.2020.6634</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cenci-Goga</surname> <given-names>B. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rossitto</surname> <given-names>P. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sechi</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McCrindle</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cullor</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Toxoplasma</italic> in animals, food, and humans: An old parasite of new concern</article-title>. <source>Foodborne. Pathog. Dis.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>751</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>762</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/fpd.2010.0795</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Del Bono</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Canessa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bruzzi</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fiorelli</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Terragna</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>Significance of specific immunoglobulin M in the chronological diagnosis of 38 cases of toxoplasmic lymphadenopathy</article-title>. <source>J. Clin. Microbiol.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>2133</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2135</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jcm.27.9.2133-2135.1989</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dhakal</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gajurel</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pomares</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Talucod</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Press</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Montoya</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Significance of a positive <italic>Toxoplasma</italic> immunoglobulin M test result in the united states</article-title>. <source>J. Clin. Microbiol.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>3601</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3605</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JCM.01663-15</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>D&#xf6;&#x15f;kaya</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Caner</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Can</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>G&#xfc;l&#xe7;e &#x130;z</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gedik</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>D&#xf6;&#x15f;kaya</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Diagnostic value of a rec-ELISA using <italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic> recombinant SporoSAG, BAG1, and GRA1 proteins in murine models infected orally with tissue cysts and oocysts</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>9</volume>, <elocation-id>e108329</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0108329</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dubey</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Bradyzoite-induced murine toxoplasmosis: Stage conversion, pathogenesis, and tissue cyst formation in mice fed bradyzoites of different strains of <italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic>
</article-title>. <source>J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>592</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>602</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1550-7408.1997.tb05965.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dubey</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Toxoplasmosis in sheep&#x2013;the last 20 years</article-title>. <source>Vet. Parasitol.</source> <volume>163</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.02.026</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dubey</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lindsay</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Speer</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Structures of <italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic> tachyzoites, bradyzoites, and sporozoites and biology and development of tissue cysts</article-title>. <source>Clin. Microbiol. Rev.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>267</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>299</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/CMR.11.2.267</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dubey</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Speer</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kwok</surname> <given-names>O. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blixt</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Oocyst-induced murine toxoplasmosis: Life cycle, pathogenicity, and stage conversion in mice fed <italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic> oocysts</article-title>. <source>J. Parasitol.</source> <volume>83</volume>, <fpage>870</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>882</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/3284282</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fricker-Hidalgo</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cimon</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chemla</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Darde</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Delhaes</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>L'Ollivier</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Toxoplasma</italic> seroconversion with negative or transient immunoglobulin m in pregnant women: Myth or reality? A French multicenter retrospective study</article-title>. <source>J. Clin. Microbiol.</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>2103</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2111</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JCM.00169-13</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Halonen</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weiss</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Toxoplasmosis</article-title>. <source>Handb. Clin. Neurol.</source> <volume>114</volume>, <fpage>125</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>145</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-444-53490-3.00008-X</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hill</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dubey</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic> prevalence in farm animals in the United States</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Parasitol.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>107</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>113</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijpara.2012.09.012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Holec-G&#x105;sior</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ferra</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hiszczy&#x144;ska-Sawicka</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kur</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The optimal mixture of <italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic> recombinant antigens (GRA1, P22, ROP1) for diagnosis of ovine toxoplasmosis</article-title>. <source>Vet. Parasitol.</source> <volume>206</volume>, <fpage>146</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>152</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.09.018</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kimbita</surname> <given-names>E. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xuan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miyazawa</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fukumoto</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mishima</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Serodiagnosis of <italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic> infection in cats by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using recombinant SAG1</article-title>. <source>Vet. Parasitol.</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>35</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>44</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0304-4017(01)00522-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liesenfeld</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Press</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Montoya</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gill</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Isaac-Renton</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hedman</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>False-positive results in immunoglobulin m (IgM) <italic>Toxoplasma</italic> antibody tests and importance of confirmatory testing: The platelia <italic>Toxo</italic> IgM test</article-title>. <source>J. Clin. Microbiol.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>174</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>178</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jcm.35.1.174-178.1997</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>X. Q.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Diagnosis of toxoplasmosis and typing of <italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Parasitol. Vectors.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>292</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13071-015-0902-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Seroprevalence and epidemiology of <italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic> in animals in the qinghai-Tibetan plateau area, China</article-title>. <source>Pathogens.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <elocation-id>432</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/pathogens10040432</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lopes</surname> <given-names>W. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodriguez</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Souza</surname> <given-names>F. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>dos Santos</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>dos Santos</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rosanese</surname> <given-names>W. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Sexual transmission of <italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic> in sheep</article-title>. <source>Vet. Parasitol.</source> <volume>195</volume>, <fpage>47</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>56</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.12.056</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lourido</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Toxoplasma gondii</article-title>. <source>Trends. Parasitol.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>944</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>945</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pt.2019.07.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lyons</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McLeod</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roberts</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic> tachyzoite-bradyzoite interconversion</article-title>. <source>Trends. Parasitol.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>198</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>201</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s1471-4922(02)02248-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Masatani</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matsuo</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tanaka</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Terkawi</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>E. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goo</surname> <given-names>Y. K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Tg</italic>GRA23, a novel <italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic> dense granule protein associated with the parasitophorous vacuole membrane and intravacuolar network</article-title>. <source>Parasitol. Int.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>372</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>379</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.parint.2013.04.003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Matta</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rinkenberger</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dunay</surname> <given-names>I. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sibley</surname> <given-names>L. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic> infection and its implications within the central nervous system</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>467</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>480</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41579-021-00518-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Montoya</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liesenfeld</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Toxoplasmosis</article-title>. <source>Lancet.</source> <volume>363</volume>, <fpage>1965</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7196</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16412-X</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Montoya</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Remington</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Management of <italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic> infection during pregnancy</article-title>. <source>Clin. Infect. Dis.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>554</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>566</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/590149</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Paquet</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yudin</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<collab>Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Toxoplasmosis in pregnancy: Prevention, screening, and treatment</article-title>. <source>J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>78</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>81</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s1701-2163(15)31053-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pietkiewicz</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hiszczy&#x144;ska-Sawicka</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kur</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Petersen</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nielsen</surname> <given-names>H. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stankiewicz</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Usefulness of <italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic>-specific recombinant antigens in serodiagnosis of human toxoplasmosis</article-title>. <source>J. Clin. Microbiol.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>1779</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1781</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JCM.42.4.1779-1781.2004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Potasman</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Araujo</surname> <given-names>F. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Remington</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Toxoplasma</italic> antigens recognized by naturally occurring human antibodies</article-title>. <source>J. Clin. Microbiol.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>1050</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1054</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jcm.24.6.1050-1054.1986</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Robert-Gangneux</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dard&#xe9;</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Epidemiology of and diagnostic strategies for toxoplasmosis</article-title>. <source>Clin. Microbiol. Rev.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>264</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>296</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/CMR.05013-11</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Saadatnia</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Golkar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>A review on human toxoplasmosis</article-title>. <source>Scand. J. Infect. Dis.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>805</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>814</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3109/00365548.2012.693197</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sensini</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pascoli</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marchetti</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Castronari</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marangi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sbaraglia</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>IgG avidity in the serodiagnosis of acute <italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic> infection: A multicenter study</article-title>. <source>Clin. Microbiol. Infect.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>29</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-0691.1996.tb00196.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Teimouri</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abbaszadeh Afshar</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mohtasebi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jafarpour Azami</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alimi</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Keshavarz</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Assessment of an in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and IgG avidity test based on SAG1 and GRA7 proteins for discriminating between acute and chronic toxoplasmosis in humans</article-title>. <source>J. Clin. Microbiol.</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>e0041621</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JCM.00416-21</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tenter</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heckeroth</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weiss</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic>: from animals to humans</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Parasitol.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>1217</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1258</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0020-7519(00)00124-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Terkawi</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kameyama</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rasul</surname> <given-names>N. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xuan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nishikawa</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Development of an immunochromatographic assay based on dense granule protein 7 for serological detection of <italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic> infection</article-title>. <source>Clin. Vaccine Immunol.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>596</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>601</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/CVI.00747-12</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>G. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hassan</surname> <given-names>I. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Pathogenicity of five strains of <italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic> from different animals to chickens</article-title>. <source>Korean. J. Parasitol.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>162</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3347/kjp.2015.53.2.155</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Seroprevalence and risk factors of <italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic> in urban cats from China</article-title>. <source>BMC. Vet. Res.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>331</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12917-022-03427-w</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xicot&#xe9;ncatl-Garc&#xed;a</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Enriquez-Flores</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Correa</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Testing new peptides from <italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic> SAG1, GRA6, and GRA7 for serotyping: better definition using GRA6 in mother/newborns pairs with risk of congenital transmission in Mexico</article-title>. <source>Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.</source> <volume>9</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fcimb.2019.00368</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ai</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ni</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic> and <italic>Neospora caninum</italic> infections in stray cats and dogs in the qinghai-Tibetan plateau area, China</article-title>. <source>Anim. (Basel).</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>1390</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani12111390</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ybanez</surname> <given-names>R. H. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ybanez</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nishikawa</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Review on the current trends of toxoplasmosis serodiagnosis in humans</article-title>. <source>Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.</source> <volume>8</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fcimb.2020.00204</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>