Abstract
Objectives:
To summarize the clinical characteristics, outcomes and identify risk factors of Acinetobacter baumannii (AB) meningitis in children.
Methods:
This was a single-center, retrospective study. Children hospitalized between January 2016 and December 2021 who were diagnosed with AB meningitis were included. The clinical characteristics and outcomes were reviewed. Risk factors were determined using univariate analyses (chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests).
Results:
Seventeen patients were included; 15 cases were secondary to neurosurgery, and two were neonates with primary bacterial meningitis. Common symptoms included fever, convulsions and nervous system abnormalities. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tests typically showed increased white blood cell counts dominated by neutrophils, reduced glucose levels and elevated protein levels. Ten patients were successfully treated (successful treatment [ST] group); seven had failed treatment (failed treatment [FT] group). Univariate analyses revealed that mechanical ventilation, routine white cell counts in the peripheral blood, procalcitonin, protein in the CSF, septic shock and carbapenem-resistant AB (CRAB) differed significantly between the groups.
Conclusion:
AB meningitis in children has a high mortality rate. FT was associated with mechanical ventilation, septic shock, CRAB, lower peripheral leukocyte counts, higher protein levels in the CSF and procalcitonin. Larger studies are needed to identify independent risk factors for adverse outcomes.
Introduction
Acinetobacter baumannii (AB), a gram-negative coccobacillus, is an opportunistic pathogen. It is primarily associated with patients admitted to hospitals or undergoing healthcare-related treatments, particularly those who receive treatment in intensive care units (ICUs). AB can cause multiple system infections, including pneumonia, bloodstream infections, meningitis, skin infections and soft tissue infections.
Bacterial meningitis is among the most difficult diseases to treat in children and exhibits a poor prognosis. AB is a significant nosocomial meningitis agent () and accounts for >25% of all pathogens isolated from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) ().However, the resistance rates of AB to various antibiotics continue to increase yearly. Few antibacterial drugs are available to treat such bacterial infections, presenting great therapeutic challenges (). The current treatments are mainly combing at least two antibiotics based on tigecycline, polymyxin B, sulbactam or carbapenems (). Bacterial meningitis with extensively drug-resistant pathogens can lead to ineffective antibacterial treatment and has the highest mortality rates among infections (). A previous study reported that AB-induced central nervous system (CNS) infections account for a high risk of death in pediatric patients (). AB meningitis is rare in children. The lack of clinical cases, nonspecific clinical manifestations, limited drugs choices, and poor immunity in children increase the severity of the damage caused by this infection and the challenges of clinical treatment ().
AB meningitis often occurs secondary to neurosurgery, leading to high mortality rates and neurological sequela (). Most previous studies have focused on the risk factors for the occurrence of AB meningitis, such as neurosurgery, head trauma, CSF leakage, wound infection, and foreign body implantation (). However, few studies have focused on the risk factors for poor outcomes.
Carbapenem-resistant AB (CRAB) has become increasingly problematic in recent years (). A previous systematic review reported that CRAB is a leading pathogen associated with deaths attributable to bacterial antimicrobial resistance and caused more than 50000 deaths in 2019. Furthermore, CRAB was the fourth leading pathogen-drug combination globally for 2019 (). Patients with CRAB have double the mortality rate and a significantly greater burden of illness compared with those with carbapenem-susceptible AB (CSAB) (; ). Multiple studies have shown that CRAB was the most common pathogen in non-survivors of bacterial meningitis, and the worst clinical outcomes often occurred with CRAB infections (; ; ; ). However, few studies have compared the differences in clinical manifestations and outcomes between meningitis patients with CRAB vs CSAB.
Few reports have been published on AB meningitis in children, and of these, few were case reports or reviews. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed children with this infection who were hospitalized at our institution. Our primary objective was to summarize the clinical characteristics and outcomes and identify key factors associated with the infection, thereby enhancing clinicians’ understanding and management of this serious condition.
Methods
Setting and study design
This retrospective study was conducted in the Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, a national children’s medical center. Children (aged ≤18 years) hospitalized from 1st January 2016 to 31st December 2021 from whom AB was detected in the CSF were included. Only the first episodes of positive cultures was included to avoid case duplication.
The inclusion criteria were (1) isolation of AB from the CSF; (2) increased white blood cell counts (≥10×106/L) and protein levels (≥450 mg/L) and decreased glucose in the CSF; and (3) clinical evidence of bacterial meningitis (i.e., fever, headache, vomiting, confusion, irritability and meningeal irritation). The exclusion criteria were (1) incomplete medical records and (2) the cases in which positive CSF cultures were obtained in the absence of clinical and laboratory features of meningitis.
Patients were divided into either the successful treatment (ST) or failed treatment (FT) group according to patient outcomes. ST was defined as two consecutive negative CSF cultures with clinical symptoms that had disappeared and normal routine peripheral blood and CSF tests. FT was defined as persistent positive CSF cultures before discharge or patient’s eventual death.
Patients were also divided into CRAB group and CSAB group according to results of susceptibility testing. And we compared clinical characteristics between the two groups.
Data collection
Medical records of all included patients were reviewed. Data extracted included demographic information, hospital stay length, hospitalization ward, days from first neurosurgery to diagnosis, clinical features, diagnosis, underlying diseases, previous hospital admission within 6 months, invasive procedures, and receipt of immunosuppressive therapy (including cytotoxic agents within 6 weeks or corticosteroids at a dosage ≥10 mg of prednisolone daily for >5 days within 4 weeks prior to detection (). Additional data included antibiotic resistance, previous antibiotic therapy within 30 days, co-infections with other bacteria or fungi, antibiotic treatment, time to CSF sterilization, and patient outcomes. Sepsis and septic shock were evaluated by clinician according to the Sepsis-3 (). And neonatal sepsis was evaluated by clinician according to the consensus of domestic experts ().
Antibiotic resistance and antimicrobial susceptibility testing
We reviewed the antibiotic-resistance profiles of included AB isolates. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/MS) (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) was used to confirm the species of the isolates. AST was performed in the microbiology laboratory of the hospital using the Kirby-Bauer method or automated systems (VITEK 2 Compact). AST was conducted for 14 agents: imipenem, meropenem, levofloxacin, amikacin, gentamicin, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefoperazone-sulbactam, colistin, minocycline, tigecycline and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (TMP-SMX). Antibiotic susceptibilities were defined according to the criteria of the breakpoints (). CRAB was defined as having minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of imipenem or meropenem ≥8 mg/L. CSAB was defined as having MICs of imipenem and meropenem ≤2 mg/L.
Statistical analyses
Categorical data were summarized as counts and percentages; chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used for comparisons between two groups. Continuous data were presented as means ± standard deviation or median with interquartile range (IQR), depending on the degree of skewness in the distributions evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Differences were identified using t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software, version 23.0.
Results
Patients’ clinical characteristics
Seventeen patients (9 boys; 8 girls) with AB meningitis hospitalized from 1st January 2016 to 31st December 2021 were included. Table 1 showed their clinical characteristics. The median age of the patients was 24.00 months (IQR, 17.00–107.00 months); only one patient was a neonate. Ten patients (58.82%) were in the ICU; seven (41.18%) were in general wards. Of the 17 patients, 15 were cases secondary to neurosurgery; two were neonates with primary bacterial meningitis. The average time from the first surgery to positive CSF culture was 15.00 days (IQR, 4.50–24.00 days). All patients had underlying diseases, including craniocerebral tumor (12% [70.59%]), intracranial hemorrhage (1 [5.88%]), hydrocephalus (2 [11.76%]) and neonatal sepsis (2 [11.76%]).
Table 1
| Characteristics | All patients (N=17) | CRAB (N=12) | CSAB (N=5) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 9(52.94%) | 6(50.00%) | 3(60.00%) | 1.000 |
| Age, m, median (IQR) | 24.00(17.00,107.00) | 23.50(17.00,142.75) | 28.00(9.49,50.00) | 0.598 |
| Weight, kg, median (IQR) | 16.88 ± 12.51 | 19.01 ± 14.01 | 11.78 ± 6.38 | 0.165 |
| Length of hospital stay, d, median (IQR) | 91.65 ± 62.10 | 102.42 ± 67.82 | 65.80 ± 39.96 | 0.191 |
| Hospitalization ward | ||||
|   Pediatric intensive care unit | 10(58.82%) | 10(83.33%) | 0(0.00%) | 0.003 |
|  General wards | 7(41.18%) | 2(16.67%) | 5(100.00%) | |
| Clinical features of infections | ||||
|  Duration of fever, d, median (IQR) | 20.12 ± 10.51 | 22.25 ± 11.37 | 15.00 ± 6.28 | 0.204 |
|  White cell count, ×10^9/L, median (IQR) | 17.00(12.95.24.75) | 16.00(12.55,28.70) | 17.00(12.65,20.90) | 0.527 |
|  Neutrophil, %, median (IQR) | 76.70(61.05,83.00) | 81.05(62.70,83.55) | 68.90(60.85,75.15) | 0.154 |
|  C-reactive protein, mg/L, median (IQR) | 87.80 ± 51.23 | 78.22 ± 53.40 | 110.80 ± 41.46 | 0.244 |
|  Procalcitonin, ng/ml, median (IQR) | 1.03(0.11,2.92) | 1.13(0.19,3.30) | 0.14(0.06,2.18) | 0.141 |
|  Interleukin 6, pg/ml, median (IQR) | 126.60(41.78,262.60) | 235.70(126.60,283.90) | 45.02(38.55,46.30) | 0.087 |
|  Sepsis | 6(35.29%) | 5(41.67%) | 1(20.00%) | 0.600 |
|  Septic shock | 7(41.18%) | 7(58.33%) | 0(0.00%) | 0.044 |
|  White cell count in CSF,×10^6/L, median (IQR) | 1160.00(495.00,2485.00) | 1200.00(625.00,2492.50) | 1000.00(170.00,1830.00) | 0.205 |
|  Protein in CSF, mg/L, median (IQR) | 3577.90(2134.10,5755.00) | 4744.20(3236.73,7500.90) | 2306.50(1134.30,2643.45) | 0.011 |
|  Glucose in CSF, mmol/L, median (IQR) | 0.80(0.05,1.85) | 0.10(0.00,1.50) | 1.60(1.15,2.35) | 0.071 |
| Underlying condition | 0.010 | |||
|  Craniocerebral tumor | 12(70.59%) | 11(91.67%) | 1(20.00%) | |
|  Intracranial hemorrhage | 1(5.88%) | 0(0.00%) | 1(20.00%) | |
|  Hydrocephalus | 2(11.76%) | 0(0.00%) | 2(40.00%) | |
|  Neonatal sepsis | 2(11.76%) | 1(8.33%) | 1(20.00%) | |
| Neurosurgery | 15(88.24%) | 11(91.67%) | 4(80.00%) | 0.515 |
| Days from first neurosurgery to diagnosis, d, median (IQR) | 15.00(4.50,24.00) | 10.50(4.25,24.00) | 20.00(7.50,31.50) | 0.527 |
| Duration of targeted antibiotic treatment, d, median (IQR) | 30.00(18.50,42.00) | 34.00(14.75,42.00) | 23.00(20.00,34.00) | 0.597 |
| CSF sterilization | ||||
|  Yes | 10(58.82%) | 5(41.67%) | 5(100.00%) | 0.044 |
|  No | 7(41.18%) | 7(58.33%) | 0(0.00%) | |
Characteristics of patients with Acinetobacter baumannii meningitis.
CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CRAB, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; CSAB, carbapenem-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii.
All patients had clinical manifestations of recurrent fever and disturbance of consciousness. 11 patients had vomiting; five had convulsions, and three were positive for meningeal irritation. During treatment, five patients developed complications: four had hydrocephalus, and one had subdural effusion. Routine peripheral blood tests showed increased white blood cell counts dominated by neutrophils, c-reactive protein (CRP) levels averaging 87.80 ± 51.23 mg/L and increased procalcitonin (PCT) with an average of 1.03 (IQR, 0.11–2.92) ng/mL. The CSF changed typically: increased white blood cell counts with an average of 1160.00×106/L (IQR, 495.00–2485.00) dominated by neutrophils; decreased glucose with an average of 0.80 mmol/L (IQR, 0.05–1.85), and increased protein contents averaging 3577.90 mg/L (IQR, 2134.10–5755.00). Six patients (35.29%) had sepsis; seven (41.18%) developed septic shock.
Twelve patients had CRAB; five had CSAB according to antibiotic resistance. We compared clinical characteristics between them. Hospitalization ward (P=0.003) and distribution of underlying conditions (P=0.010) differed significantly between them. Among CRAB patients, 11 (91.67%) had craniocerebral tumors, whereas only one CSAB patient (20.00%) had a craniocerebral tumor. Protein in the CSF and the proportion of septic shock were significantly higher in the CRAB group than in the CSAB group. Conversely, the proportion of CSF sterilization was significantly lower in the CRAB group than in the CSAB group.
AST
Figure 1 showed the AST results of the AB isolates to common clinical antibiotics. Of these, 70.6% of the strains were resistant to meropenem and imipenem. The resistance rates to ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefoperazone-sulbactam, amikacin, gentamicin and TMP-SMX were 70.6%, 70.6%, 70.6%, 64.7%, 64.7%, 64.7%, 64.7% and 52.9%, respectively. The resistance rates were lower to levofloxacin (29.4%) and minocycline (5.9%) than to other antibiotics, whereas the intermediate rates were higher (41.2% and 35.3%, respectively). No isolates that were resistant to colistin or tigecycline.
Figure 1
Treatment and outcomes
Two patients had neonatal sepsis. Four patients received antibiotics to prevent perioperative infection and 11 cases underwent anti-infective treatment before being diagnosed with meningitis. When the CSF culture was positive, the treatment plan was actively adjusted according to antibiotic susceptibility. Patients with CSAB were treated primarily with dual antibiotic therapy based on meropenem, and other antibiotics included ampicillin-sulbactam, cefoperazone-sulbactam, amikacin, and fosfomycin. Of the patients with CRAB, three received dual antibiotic therapy, including meropenem and ampicillin-sulbactam, levofloxacin and sulbactam sodium, ampicillin-sulbactam and polymyxin B. Seven received triple antibiotic therapy based on meropenem and tigecycline; other antibiotics included fosfomycin, quinolones and sulbactam. The remaining two patients eventually received quadruple antibiotic therapy (meropenem, sulbactam sodium, polymyxin B and levofloxacin/fosfomycin). Three patients received intrathecal injections of polymyxin B. The average time for targeted antibiotic treatment was 30.00 days (IQR, 18.50–42.00), lasting 2–4 weeks after two consecutive negative CSF cultures. Finally, ten patients’ CSF cultures became negative. Seven patients died; all of whom had CRAB, and their CSF cultures remained positive.
Univariate analysis of patients with AB meningitis, stratified by outcome
Of the seventeen patients included in the final analysis, 10 had ST, and seven had FT. Univariate analyses revealed that mechanical ventilation (P=0.044), routine white blood cell counts in the peripheral blood (P=0.031), PCT (P=0.045), protein in the CSF (P=0.032), septic shock (P=0.004) and CRAB (P=0.044) differed significantly between the groups (Table 2).
Table 2
| Characteristic | FT N=7 | ST N=10 | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, m, median (IQR) | 70.00(20.00,146,00) | 22.00(12.26,39.00) | 0.143 |
| Male sex | 3(42.86%) | 6(60%) | 0.637 |
| Duration of hospital stay before detected, d, median (IQR) | 27.00(12.00,53.00) | 19.00(6.75,30.00) | 0.329 |
| Previous hospital admission within 6 m | 2(28.57%) | 7(70.00%) | 0.153 |
| Neurosurgery | 7(100.00%) | 8(80.00%) | 0.485 |
| Days from first neurosurgery to diagnosis, d, median (IQR) | 9.00(5.00,25.00) | 17.50(2.25,24.00) | 0.845 |
| Mechanical ventilation | 7(100.00%) | 5(50.00%) | 0.044 |
| Indwelling central venous catheter | 6(85.71%) | 5(50.00%) | 0.304 |
| Indwelling ventricular drainage | 4(57.15%) | 3(30.00%) | 0.644 |
| Receiving immunosuppressive therapy | 1(14.29%) | 0(0.00%) | 0.412 |
| Co-infections with other bacteria or fungi | 2(28.57%) | 4(40.00%) | 1.000 |
| Intrathecal injection | 0(0.00%) | 3(30.00%) | 0.228 |
| Previous antibiotic therapy within 30 d | |||
|  Cephalosporins | 7(100.00%) | 8(80.00%) | 0.485 |
|  β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor | 4(57.15%) | 2(20.00%) | 0.162 |
|  Carbapenems | 6(85.71%) | 5(50.00%) | 0.304 |
|  Vancomycin | 4(57.15%) | 7(70.00%) | 0.644 |
| Clinical features of infections | |||
|  Duration of fever, d, median (IQR) | 19.90 ± 10.01 | 20.43 ± 12.00 | 0.923 |
|  White cell count, ×10^9/L, median (IQR) | 14.85 ± 4.45 | 25.34 ± 9.88 | 0.031 |
|  Neutrophil, %, median (IQR) | 82.30(76.70,86.10) | 69.70(58.60,80.70) | 0.107 |
|  C-reactive protein, mg/L, median (IQR) | 76.87 ± 48.31 | 103.43 ± 54.90 | 0.308 |
|  Procalcitonin, ng/ml, median (IQR) | 1.87(1.07,4.36) | 0.14(0.90,2.18) | 0.045 |
|  Interleukin 6, pg/ml, median (IQR) | 47.58(38.55,186.10) | 47.58(32.07,235.70) | 0.210 |
|  White cell count in CSF,×10^6/L, median (IQR) | 1200.00(1000.00,2470.00) | 1080.00(198.75,2500.00) | 0.463 |
|  Protein in CSF, mg/L, median (IQR) | 4960.00(3577.90,7980.20) | 2440.25(1415.48,4541.00) | 0.032 |
|  Glucose in CSF, mmol/L, median (IQR) | 0.10(0.00,1.70) | 1.20(0.18,2.15) | 0.184 |
|  Sepsis | 5(71.43%) | 2(20.00%) | 0.058 |
|  Septic shock | 6(85.71%) | 1(10.00%) | 0.004 |
| Hospitalization ward | 0.134 | ||
|  Pediatric intensive care unit | 6(85.71%) | 4(40.00%) | |
|  General wards | 1(14.29%) | 6(60.00%) | |
| Detection with CRAB | 7(100.00%) | 5(50.00%) | 0.044 |
| Duration of targeted antibiotic treatment, d, median (IQR) | 17.00(13.00,42.00) | 34.00(22.25,42.00) | 0.186 |
Univariate analysis of factors associated with the FT group compared with those of the ST group.
ST, successful treatment group; FT, failed treatment group; CRAB, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid.
Discussion
AB has become a major problematic pathogen in healthcare settings for extensive drug resistance. All-cause mortality from Acinetobacter spp. meningitis is reported to range from 15%–71%, and the highest mortality rates have been observed in neonates (). Children have weaker immunity; thus, when infection occurs, the harm is more serious. Therefore, special attention should be paid to AB meningitis.
AB meningitis is mostly secondary to neurosurgery (). In our study, 15/17 patients (88.24%) underwent neurosurgery. Owing to a lack of specificity of clinical manifestations, clinicians often have difficulty identifying AB meningitis in time (). Most patients presented with fever, convulsions, and nervous system abnormalities. Blood routine examinations showed that inflammatory indicators, including CRP, PCT and interleukin-6, were significantly increased. CSF tests typically showed increased white blood cell counts dominated by neutrophils, reduced glucose levels and significantly elevated protein levels.
Because the safety of children’s medication is crucial, the choice of antibiotics is greatly limited. The guidance by Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) recommended combining at least two active antibiotics when possible to treat AB infection (). For first-line treatment, meropenem is the most commonly recommended empiric treatment (). In our study, patients with CSAB were treated mainly with meropenem. However, its resistance rate exceeds 70%. In addition, CRAB strains were resistant to most antibiotics except polymyxins and tigecycline. For these strains, guidelines recommend administering polymyxin B intravenously or in combination with intrathecal injection to treat CRAB meningitis (; ). Previous literature showed for extensively drug-resistant AB meningitis, patients treated with intravenous and intrathecal/intracerebral ventricle injection of polymyxin B had a significantly lower 28-day mortality (55.26% vs. 8.70%, P = 0.01) and higher rates microbiological clearance (91.30% vs. 18.42%, P < 0.001) compared with patients treated with other antibiotics (). In our study, two patients received intrathecal injections of polymyxin B and one patient received intravenous polymyxin B in combination with intrathecal injection. They were all treated successfully. Although CRAB is usually resistant to carbapenems, clinicians still try to combine carbapenems with other drugs to treat CRAB infections clinically. Studies have shown that high-dose, prolonged infusions of meropenem combined with other sensitive antibiotics have synergistic effects (; ). Therefore, among twelve patients with CRAB infections, all but two were treated with meropenem and eight cases received high-dose, prolonged infusions. However, this approach did not have a favorable outcome. Only five patients treated with meropenem were eventually cured. Among them, three cases were also treated with intrathecal injection of polymyxin B, and two cases were treated with ampicillin-sulbactam. Therefore, successful treatment did not seem to be attributable to meropenem alone. Tigecycline is another first-line antibiotic for treating CRAB; however, its concentration in the CSF is limited (). Therefore, tigecycline has limited role in CRAB meningitis (). Seven of our patients received therapy with meropenem and tigecycline, and other antibiotics included fosfomycin, quinolones or sulbactam. However, treatment ultimately failed in six of them. Therefore, clinicians must better understand CRAB treatment, and rational selection of antibacterial drugs is crucial for treating meningitis. Additionally, sulbactam is also an important option for the treatment of CRAB infections. The guidance by IDSA suggested high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam as a component of combination therapy for CRAB, regardless of whether susceptibility has been demonstrated (). In our study, seven patients received therapy with sulbactam. When CRAB infections were refractory to other antibiotics or in cases where intolerance or resistance to other agents, cefiderocol may also be an option (; ).
In our study, 10 patients (58.82%) were ST, and seven (41.18%) were FT. Few studies have investigated the differences between FT and ST. Chen et al. reported that for nosocomial meningitis and patients with multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria, significantly different factors in ST vs FT included pathogen type, highest body temperature in the first 24 h of symptoms, CSF glucose level and meropenem susceptibility (for AB) (). In our study, univariate analyses revealed that mechanical ventilation, routine white blood cell counts in the peripheral blood, PCT, protein in the CSF, the proportion of septic shock and CRAB differed significantly between the ST and FT groups. Standard laboratory parameters, such as peripheral leukocyte counts, glucose levels and protein in the CSF were not reliable predictors for infection in patients with healthcare-associated meningitis (). However, in this study, patients with FT had lower peripheral leukocyte counts and higher CSF protein levels than did those with ST (P=0.031, 0.032). These laboratory parameters can be used as indicators to evaluate the disease severity, and these indicators should draw clinicians’ attention to these patients.
All patients in the FT group had CRAB. Due to the limited antimicrobial drugs available, CRAB tends to cause severer infections and has a worse prognosis than CSAB (). However, we asked whether the clinical manifestations differed between these two groups and compared their clinical characteristics. CRAB infections mostly occurred in the ICU, whereas CSAB infections mostly occurred in the general ward, consistent with the results of previous studies (). The widespread prevalence of CRAB in ICUs is usually related to the large number of severe patients with low immunity, catheter and mechanical ventilation and wide antibiotic use (). The proportion of CSF sterilization was significantly lower in the CRAB group than in the CSAB group, which was understandable given the limited selection of effective antibiotics for CRAB. Notably, protein levels in the CSF were significantly higher in the CRAB group than in the CSAB group. We speculated whether this was related to the virulence differences between CRAB and CSAB but have found no other studies reporting similar results; thus, the clinical significance of our results requires further exploration.
This study had some limitations. First, the major limitation was the single-center, retrospective nature of the study. Collecting complete data was difficult and may have led to biased results. Moreover, no independent risk factor analysis was performed owing to the limited number of cases. Second, because the CRAB epidemiology differs regionally and may also vary over time in the same region, conclusions from our study may not be universally applicable to other centers.
In conclusion, AB meningitis in children was mostly secondary to neurosurgery and had a high mortality rate. FT was associated with mechanical ventilation, septic shock, CRAB, lower peripheral leukocyte counts, higher protein in the CSF and PCT. Larger studies are needed to identify independent risk factors for adverse outcomes. Because of the emergence of CRAB, choosing the best antibiotics remains challenging and critical to patient outcomes.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of the Children’s Hospital of Fudan University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements.
Author contributions
ZW: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft. LY: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft. PF: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft. XW: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft. JX: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft. YY: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft. SH: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft. CW: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft. HY: Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors appreciate the data management provided by the Infectious Diseases Surveillance of Pediatrics of China and Department of Clinical Laboratory. We thank Traci Raley, MS, ELS, from Liwen Bianji (Edanz) (www.liwenbianji.cn) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
Antimicrobial ResistanceC. (2022). Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet399, 629–655. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0
2
ChenT.FuY.HuaX.XuQ.LanP.JiangY.et al. (2021). Acinetobacter baumannii strains isolated from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and bloodstream analysed by cgMLST: the dominance of clonal complex CC92 in CSF infections. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents58, 106404. doi:Â 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106404
3
ChenY.LiF.ZhuM.LiuL.LuoY. (2020). Outcome and factors of patients with nosocomial meningitis by multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in a tertiary hospital in China: a retrospective study. Br. J. Neurosurg.34, 324–328. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2019.1710819
4
Chinese Research Hospital Association Of Critical Care, MChinese Research Hospital Association Of Evidence, BTranslational Infectious, D (2019). [Chinese expert consensus on polymyxins in the clinical practice]. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue31, 1194–1198. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.10.003
5
ChusriS.ChongsuvivatwongV.SilpapojakulK.SingkhamananK.HortiwakulT.CharernmakB.et al. (2019). Clinical characteristics and outcomes of community and hospital-acquired Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect.52, 796–806. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2019.03.004
6
ChusriS.SakarunchaiI.KositpantawongN.PanthuwongS.SantimaleeworagunW.PattharachayakulS.et al. (2018). Outcomes of adjunctive therapy with intrathecal or intraventricular administration of colistin for post-neurosurgical meningitis and ventriculitis due to carbapenem-resistant acinetobacter baumannii. Int. J. Antimicrobial Agents51, 646–650. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.12.002
7
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2022). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing M100-S32 (Wayne: CLSI).
8
KimB.-N.PelegA. Y.LodiseT. P.LipmanJ.LiJ.NationR.et al. (2009). Management of meningitis due to antibiotic-resistant Acinetobacter species. Lancet Infect. Dis.9, 245–255. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70055-6
9
KorinekA. M.BaugnonT.GolmardJ. L.van EffenterreR.CoriatP.PuybassetL. (2006). Risk factors for adult nosocomial meningitis after craniotomy role of antibiotic prophylaxis. Neurosurgery59, 126–133. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000243291.61566.21
10
KyriakidisI.VasileiouE.PanaZ. D.TragiannidisA. (2021). Acinetobacter baumannii antibiotic resistance mechanisms. Pathog. (Basel Switzerland)10, 373. doi:Â 10.3390/pathogens10030373
11
LemosE. V.de la HozF. P.EinarsonT. R.McGhanW. F.QuevedoE.CastanedaC.et al. (2014). Carbapenem resistance and mortality in patients with Acinetobacter baumannii infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.20, 416–423. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12363
12
MauldinP. D.SalgadoC. D.HansenI. S.DurupD. T.BossoJ. A. (2010). Attributable hospital cost and length of stay associated with health care-associated infections caused by antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.54, 109–115. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01041-09
13
PanS.HuangX.WangY.LiL.ZhaoC.YaoZ.et al. (2018). Efficacy of intravenous plus intrathecal/intracerebral ventricle injection of polymyxin B for post-neurosurgical intracranial infections due to MDR/XDR Acinectobacter baumannii: a retrospective cohort study. Antimicrobial Resistance Infect Control7, 8. doi:Â 10.1186/s13756-018-0305-5
14
PanicH.GjurasinB.SantiniM.KutlesaM.PapicN. (2022). Etiology and outcomes of healthcare-associated meningitis and ventriculitis-A single center cohort study. Infect. Dis. Rep.14, 420–427. doi: 10.3390/idr14030045
15
PintadoV.Ruiz-GarbajosaP.Aguilera-AlonsoD.Baquero-ArtigaoF.BouG.CantónR.et al. (2023). Executive summary of the consensus document of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) on the diagnosis and antimicrobial treatment of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Enfermedades Infecciosas Y Microbiol Clinica (English ed.)41, 360–370. doi: 10.1016/j.eimce.2022.06.014
16
PogueJ. M.ZhouY.KanakamedalaH.CaiB. (2022). Burden of illness in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections in US hospitals between 2014 and 2019. BMC Infect. Dis.22, 36. doi:Â 10.1186/s12879-021-07024-4
17
RodvoldK. A.GotfriedM. H.CwikM.Korth-BradleyJ. M.DukartG.Ellis-GrosseE. J. (2006). Serum, tissue and body fluid concentrations of tigecycline after a single 100 mg dose. J. Antimicrobial Chemother.58, 1221–1229. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl403
18
SaleemA. F.ShahM. S.ShaikhA. S.MirF.ZaidiA. K. (2011). Acinetobacter species meningitis in children: a case series from Karachi, Pakistan. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries5, 809–814. doi: 10.3855/jidc.1697
19
ShiJ.SunT.CuiY.WangC.WangF.ZhouY.et al. (2020). Multidrug resistant and extensively drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii hospital infection associated with high mortality: a retrospective study in the pediatric intensive care unit. BMC Infect. Dis.20, 597. doi:Â 10.1186/s12879-020-05321-y
20
SingerM.DeutschmanC. S.SeymourC. W.Shankar-HariM.AnnaneD.BauerM.et al. (2016). The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA315, 801–810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287
21
Subspecialty Group of Neonatology, t. S. o. P. C. M. AProfessional Committee of Infectious Diseases, N. S. C. M. D. A (2019). [Expert consensus on the diagnosis and management of neonatal sepsis (version 2019)]. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi57, 252–257. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2019.04.005
22
TammaP. D.AitkenS. L.BonomoR. A.MathersA. J.van DuinD.ClancyC. J. (2022). Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of AmpC beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales, Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections. Clin. Infect. Dis.74, 2089–2114. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab1013
23
TammaP. D.AitkenS. L.BonomoR. A.MathersA. J.van DuinD.ClancyC. J. (2023). Infectious diseases society of america 2023 guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial resistant gram-negative infections. Clin. Infect. Dis.,ciad428. doi:Â 10.1093/cid/ciad428
24
ThatrimontrichaiA.JanjindamaiW.DissaneevateS.ManeenilG. (2021). Neonatal multidrug-resistant bacterial meningitis: a 29-year study from a tertiary hospital in Thailand. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries15, 1021–1026. doi: 10.3855/jidc.12808
25
TunkelA. R.HasbunR.BhimrajA.ByersK.KaplanS. L.ScheldW. M.et al. (2017). 2017 infectious diseases society of america’s clinical practice guidelines for healthcare-associated ventriculitis and meningitis. Clin. Infect. Dis.64, e34–e65. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw861
26
XiaoJ.ZhangC.YeS. (2019). Acinetobacter baumannii meningitis in children: a case series and literature review. Infection47, 643–649. doi: 10.1007/s15010-018-1234-1
27
YeJ.TanL.-H.ShenZ.-P.YuY.-S.LaiD.-M.FanJ.et al. (2020). Polymyxin for the treatment of intracranial infections of extensively drug-resistant bacteria in children after neurosurgical operation. World J. Pediatrics: WJP16, 528–532. doi: 10.1007/s12519-020-00350-8
28
YuZ.PangX.WuX.ShanC.JiangS. (2018). Clinical outcomes of prolonged infusion (extended infusion or continuous infusion) versus intermittent bolus of meropenem in severe infection: A meta-analysis. PloS One13, e0201667. doi:Â 10.1371/journal.pone.0201667
29
ZhangX.LiF.AwanF.JiangH.ZengZ.LvW. (2021). Molecular epidemiology and clone transmission of carbapenem-resistant acinetobacter baumannii in ICU rooms. Front. In Cell. Infect Microbiol.11. doi:Â 10.3389/fcimb.2021.633817
30
ZhengG.WangS.LvH.ZhangG. (2022). Nomogram analysis of clinical characteristics and mortality risk factor of non-fermentative gram-negative bacteria-induced post-neurosurgical meningitis. Infect. Drug Resist.15, 6379–6389. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S385502
31
ZhouP.ZhangY.WangZ.YingY.XingY.TongX.et al. (2021). Extended or continuous infusion of carbapenems in children with severe infections: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Antibiot. (Basel Switzerland)10, 1088. doi:Â 10.3390/antibiotics10091088
Summary
Keywords
Acinetobacter baumannii, meningitis, carbapenem-resistant, clinical characteristics, outcomes, children
Citation
Wang Z, Ye L, Fu P, Wu X, Xu J, Ye Y, Han S, Wang C and Yu H (2024) Clinical outcomes and risk factors of Acinetobacter baumannii meningitis in pediatric patients at a tertiary hospital in China. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 14:1408959. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1408959
Received
29 March 2024
Accepted
05 August 2024
Published
29 August 2024
Volume
14 - 2024
Edited by
Percy Schröttner, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
Reviewed by
Ziad Nasr, Qatar University, Qatar
Verena Zerbato, Azienda Sanitaria Università Integrata di Trieste, Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Wang, Ye, Fu, Wu, Xu, Ye, Han, Wang and Yu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hui Yu, yuhui4756@sina.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.