Abstract
Stimuli-responsive surface-active microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) particles are obtained by interaction with conventional cationic surfactants such as cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) in aqueous media, where MCC are in situ hydrophobized by adsorption of the cationic surfactant in water via electrostatic interaction and with the in situ hydrophobization removed by adding an equimolar amount of an anionic surfactant such as sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). The trigger is that the electrostatic interaction between the oppositely charged ionic surfactants is stronger than that between the cationic surfactant and the negative charges on particle surfaces, or the anionic surfactant prefers to form ion pairs with the cationic surfactants and thus making them desorbed from surface of MCC. Reversible O/W Pickering emulsions can then be obtained by using the MCC in combination with trace amount of a cationic surfactant and an anionic surfactant, and the anionic surfactant with a longer alkyl chain is more efficient for demulsification. With excellent biocompatibility, biodegradability, and renewability, as well as low toxicity, the biomass cellulose particles that can be made stimuli-responsive and able to reversibly self-assemble at fluid interface become ideal biocompatible particulate materials with extensive applications involving emulsions and foams.
Graphical Abstract
Introduction
The emulsions stabilized by colloid particles are called Pickering emulsions. They are very stable because there is a dense particle film at the oil–water interface, providing a strong barrier to prevent coalescence of the droplets (Aveyard et al., 2003; Binks and Horozov, 2006). However, it is relatively difficult to demulsify when the emulsions are needed to be temporarily stable. Therefore, there has been much progress in preparing stimuli-responsible colloid particles, which can make the Pickering emulsions transit easily between stable and unstable. Various triggers have been developed such as pH (Binks et al., 2007; Fujii et al., 2011a,b; Liu et al., 2012, 2014; Morse et al., 2013; Tu and Lee, 2014), temperature (Binks et al., 2005; Saigal et al., 2010), CO2/N2 (Lin and Theato, 2013; Yang et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2013; Liang et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2014), redox (Quesada et al., 2013), light irradiation (Anwar et al., 2013; Tan et al., 2014), and magnetic field (Lam et al., 2011; Blanco et al., 2013), as well as dual stimuli such as pH–temperature (Ngai et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2013; Yamagami et al., 2014), light–temperature (Fameau et al., 2013), and magnetic field intensity–temperature (Brugger and Richtering, 2007; Rahman et al., 2011). Nevertheless, the particles involved are mostly functional polymers, and their synthesis is relatively complicated. In recent years, commercially available inorganic nanoparticles with no surface activity in nature have been made surface-active by coating (Aveyard et al., 2003) or hydrophobized in situ (Cui et al., 2010, 2012). In addition, these inorganic particles such as silica nanoparticles can also be made stimuli-responsiveness through reversible hydrophobized in situ with the triggers including CO2/N2, pH, temperature, and ion pair formation (Jiang et al., 2013; Zhu et al., 2014, 2015a,b, 2017a; Liu et al., 2017).
However, the inorganic particles, lack of biocompatibility and biodegradability, are limited in the applications involving food, cosmetic, pharmaceutics, and so on. Therefore, recently, there is a great interest in biomass particles of biological origin for stabilizing emulsions and foams involved in food and drug delivery (Lam et al., 2014). The biomass particles include cellulose, starch, chitosan, and chitin, as well as aromatic macromolecules and polypeptides.
Cellulose is the most abundant biological polymer in the world, which is a linear polysaccharide with the units of β (1,4) glucopyranose. Cellulose particles have excellent biodegradability, renewability, and biocompatibility, as well as low toxicity. All these characteristics make them quite perfect materials in daily products including foods, cosmetics, and pharmaceutics (Lam et al., 2014). Many researchers have found that stable emulsions can be achieved by various sized cellulose including macroscopic fibers, microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), and nanofibrillated cellulose, in addition to cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) as particulate emulsifiers in some certain conditions (Lam et al., 2014). It has also been found that there is significant difference in surface activity and film forming (Cherhal et al., 2016; Hu et al., 2016a; Varanasi et al., 2018; Alfassi et al., 2019; Costa et al., 2019) with cellulose of different origin, size, and surface property. The native cellulose is in general hydrophilic (not surface active), and the size and shape can be diverse (Lam et al., 2014); however, it has been reported that many hydrophobically modified cellulose particles have been made potentially applicable in foods, as well as drug delivery (Lam et al., 2014), thanks to great improvement of their surface activity by hydrophobic modification (Hu et al., 2015, 2016b; Ching et al., 2016; Duffus et al., 2016; Ojala et al., 2016; Tang et al., 2017; Zhu et al., 2017b; Bai et al., 2018, 2019; Aaen et al., 2019).
With hydrophilic surfaces, cellulose particles typically stabilize water-continuous emulsions, and oil-continuous emulsions have been achieved by Andresen and Stenius (Andresen and Stenius, 2007) by using silylation to improve the hydrophobicity and surface wettability of cellulose. But the surface activity endowed in this way is not reversible. In recent years, stimuli-responsive cellulose particles by suitable surface modification have also been reported (Zoppe et al., 2012; Tang et al., 2014, 2016, 2017). For example, Zoppe et al. (2012) made thermo-responsive CNCs by grafting poly(N-isopropylacrylamine) (PNIPAM) onto their surfaces; Tang et al. (2014) reported pH–temperature–responsive CNCs grafted by poly(dimetheylaminoethylmethacrylate), and then they further obtained another dual-responsive (pH and temperature) CNC nanoparticles based on grafting binary polymer brushes consisting of poly(oligoethylene glycol) methacrylate and poly(methacrylic acid) (Tang et al., 2016). Nevertheless, the synthesis of these particulate materials is complicated.
Herein we report that cellulose particles can be made surface-active by in situ hydrophobization in water via interaction with a cationic surfactant, and the surface activity of the particles can be switched off at room temperature to achieve reversible self-assemble at fluid interface. This is accomplished simply by adding an anionic surfactant of equimolar amount into the systems, forming ion pairs with the cationic surfactant and resulting in loss of surface activity of particles. The stimuli-responsiveness of the cellulose particles is characterized by stabilization and destabilization of emulsions, and both cationic and anionic surfactants with different chain length were examined for their efficiency in stabilization and demulsification.
Experimental
Materials
Microcrystalline cellulose (99%) with a primary particle diameter of 20 μm was purchased from Sigma. Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB, 99%), dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB, 98%), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, 99%), sodium decyl sulfate (99%), and sodium octyl sulfate (99%) were all purchased from Sigma. Dodecane with a purity ≥99% was purchased from Aladdin and was columned two times through neutral alumina to remove possible polar impurities. Other chemicals were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., which were all analytically pure. The ultrapure water used in all experiments with a resistance of 18.1 MΩ cm at 25°C was provided by Nantong University Analysis and Testing Center, China.
Methods
Preparation Aqueous Dispersion of MCC Particles
Powdered MCC particles were weighed into a glass vessel with height of 6.5 cm and diameter of 2.5 cm, followed by adding pure water or surfactant solution. Then the particles were dispersed using an ultrasound probe (FS-250N; Shanghai ShengXi Co.) working at 50 W for 1 min.
Preparation and Characterization of Pickering Emulsions
The water phase (7 mL) containing MCC particles (dispersed in pure water or surfactant solution) was placed in a glass vessel, and then 1:1 by volume of dodecane (7 mL) was added. The two phases were emulsified using a A25 ultraturrax homogenizer (Shanghai OuHe Co.) operating at 7,000 revolutions/min (rpm) for 2 min.
The emulsion type was confirmed by drop test (Cui et al., 2010), and the photographs of the emulsions were taken 1 day and 7 days after preparation. To observe the microstructure of the emulsions, an emulsion drop was placed on a glass slide followed by diluted with water and then observed by a TL1530 microscope system (Shanghai DiLun Co.).
Demulsification/Restabilization Cycling of Emulsions
Emulsions stabilized by 0.3 wt% MCC dispersed in 0.01 mM cationic surfactant were destroyed by adding 0.07 mL concentrated (1 mM) anionic surfactant solution followed by gentle agitation with a stick and then leaving standing for 30 min. And the emulsions were restabilized again by addition of 0.07 mL concentrated (1 mM) cationic surfactant solution followed by homogenization at 7,000 rpm for 2 min.
Zeta Potential
Microcrystalline cellulose 0.3 wt% was dispersed in surfactant solutions or pure water of different pH adjusted by adding aqueous HCl or NaOH at 25°C. The dispersion was left on stand for 24 h to reach equilibrium; the zeta potentials (ζ) of the particles were measured using a Zetasizer Nano (Malvern) instrument at room temperature.
Interfacial Tension
The oil–water interfacial tension (IFT) was measured by drop shape method using Dropmeter A-100 drop shape analyzer (Ningbo Haishu Maishi Scientific Test Co., China), with the oil released from a U-shaped needle (outer diameter of 0.86 ± 0.005 mm) into water phase to form a reversed pendant drop at 25°C. Interfacial tension was calculated using the Young–Laplace method, and the result is an average of at least three measurements.
Results and Discussion
Dodecane-in-Water Pickering Emulsions Costabilized by Microcrystalline Cellulose and CTAB
The hydrophilic bare MCC particles are rod-like with a primary diameter 20 μm, as shown by the scanning electron microscope (SEM) image in Figure 1A. When ultrasonically dispersed in water, small particles with diameter of approximately 3–5 μm can be obtained as shown in Figure 1B. They have an isoelectric point of 2.2 (Figure 2) and is negatively charged in neutral water. Microcrystalline cellulose particles alone at 0.3 wt.% cannot stabilize a dodecane-in-water emulsion, with big drops observed in the vessel, as shown in Figure 3A. Similarly, CTAB alone below its critcal micelle concentration (cmc) of 0.9 mM (Zhu et al., 2015a) cannot stabilize a dodecane-in-water emulsion (Figure 3B). However, stable dodecane-in-water emulsions were obtained with 0.3 wt.% MCC particles plus CTAB, and almost no change appeared of the vessel after 24 h and 1 week as shown in Figures 3C,D. It was observed that the average droplet diameter decreases as CTAB concentration increases, as shown in Figure 4. It is noticed that all droplets are much bigger than those stabilized by CTAB solely at 3 mM (Figure 4D), indicating that these droplets are stabilized mainly by particles coated with surfactant, or the emulsions formed are Pickering emulsions.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Destabilization/Restabilization Transition of the Pickering Emulsions
We have observed that if SDS, an anionic surfactant, was added (amount equal to that of CTAB) into an emulsion containing 0.3 wt.% MCC and CTAB of 0.01 mM, demulsification was observed with water phase and oil phase separated after gentle stirring. After an extra amount of CTAB (0.01 mM) was added into this system and the mixture was homogenized, stable Pickering emulsions can be formed again. This means that the Pickering emulsions stabilized by MCC and CTAB can be switched between stable and unstable, and MCC can be transferred between surface-active and surface-inactive.
For an emulsion comprising 0.3 wt.% MCC dispersed in 7 mL 0.01 mM CTAB solution and 7 mL dodecane (Figure 5A), once an equimolar amount of SDS (0.07 mL 1 mM SDS solution) was added (Figure 5B), almost complete demulsification was achieved after gentle agitation. Subsequently, when 0.01 mM free CTAB was added (adding extra 0.07 mL 1 mM CTAB solution), the stability of the emulsions was recovered by homogenization (Figure 5C). The emulsions are therefore stimuli-responsive by alternate addition of an equimolar amount of SDS and extra CTAB, respectively, and the system can be recycled for at least five times as shown in Figure 5. Based on the micrographs shown in Figure 5, the average droplet sizes were statistically measured to be 45, 45, 43, 41, and 40 μm, respectively, for the five cycles, little change compared with the initial emulsion, suggesting that the droplet sizes depend only on the concentration of free CTAB in the aqueous phase.
Figure 5
A question is whether other cationic surfactants and anionic surfactants are effective for in situ hydrophobization of the cellulose particles and demulsification. To find answers, DTAB as cationic surfactant and a series of sodium alkyl sulfates (C8-C12) as anionic surfactants were examined. Figure 6 shows that in case of CTAB as cationic surfactant both C8 and C10 sodium alkyl sulfates are also effective at 0.01 mM for demulsification. And once CTAB was replaced by DTAB (C12) stimuli-responsible emulsions were obtained using C8 to C12 sodium alkyl sulfates as demulsifiers, as shown in Figure 7. However, the alkyl length did affect demulsification efficiency, as shown in Figure 8, where the oil phase is clearer after demulsification with increasing alkyl length of the anionic surfactants, and demulsification is not complete when using sodium octyl sulfate (C8), because the tendency of forming ionic pair increases with increasing total alkyl length. In fact, we have previously reported that for negatively charged silica nanoparticles the total alkyl length of cationic and anionic surfactants should be larger than C22 (Zhu et al., 2015a); this seems to be also true for the cellulose particles.
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Postulated Mechanism of MCC Reversibly Self-Assembling at Fluid Interface
The stabilization and destabilization of emulsions indicate that MCC particles can reversibly self-assemble at fluid interface. The MCC particles are too hydrophilic, which has negatively charged when pH is beyond 2.2, as indicated in Figure 2. They are little surface-active with a zeta potential of −22.5 mV in the pure water (pH of dispersion 7.86). When MCC particles are dispersed in CTAB solution, the zeta potential is increased with increasing the concentration of CTAB, from negative to positive (Figure 9). It is proved that the cationic surfactant, CTAB, adsorbs to the negatively charged surfaces of MCC particles via electrostatic interaction and thus in situ hydrophobizes the surfaces. The particles then become surface-active to adsorb at the water-oil interface, stabilizing the Pickering emulsion, whereas, on the addition of SDS, an anionic surfactant, CTAB, prefers to form ion pairs with SDS (Kume et al., 2008; Tah et al., 2011), which makes CTAB desorb from MCC particles, resulting in demulsification as MCC particles return to the aqueous phase and become surface-inactive again. The mechanism is that there is much stronger electronic interaction between the anionic and cationic surfactants than that between particles and cationic surfactants with opposite charge. Here we provide the evidence of zeta potential, SEM, and the IFT to support the theory.
Figure 9
The change of zeta potential of 0.3 wt.% MCC during emulsification and demulsification cycling is shown in Figure 10. When 0.3 wt.% MCC is dispersed in the pure water, the zeta potential is −22.5 mV (Figure 10A), and then it increases to −15.8 mV (Figure 10B) in 0.01 mM CTAB solution. After addition of equimolar amount of SDS and an extra CTAB of 0.01 mM, respectively, the zeta potential decreases to −22.3 mV (Figure 10C) and increases to −15.3 mV (Figure 10D) in the first cycle and becomes −21.7/−14.9 mV (Figures 10E,F) in the second cycle, which indicates that the adsorption/desorption of the surfactant from the particle–water interface following adding CTAB and SDS is reversible. It is also indicated by the photographs and micrographs shown in Figure 5. All these prove that cellulose particles can reversibly self-assemble at fluid interface.
Figure 10
Besides, the zeta potential of 0.3 wt.% MCC in the solution containing equimolar amount of SDS and CTAB at different concentration is almost not changed (−22.3 ± 0.1 mV) and is the same as in the pure water. It is believed that ion pairs consisting of anionic and cationic surfactants cannot absorb to the particles, as shown in Figure 9. No stable emulsions were observed using this dispersion because particles are surface-inactive.
We have measured the dodecane/water IFT with either particles or surfactants or both in water, as shown in Table 1. The dodecane/pure water IFT is in good agreement with literature value (52.1 mN/m). Although the SEM of 0.3 wt.% MCC dispersed in 0.01 mM CTAB solution and in CTAB + SDS equimolar mixture at 0.01 mM shows no significant difference (Figure 11); the IFT (41.8 mN/m) between dodecane and dispersion of 0.3% particle in 0.01 mM CTAB solution is higher than that (35.8 mN/m) between dodecane and 0.01 mM CTAB solution, indicating adsorption of CTAB on particle surface, which reduced CTAB concentration in the dispersion. Actually flocculation was observed when 0.3 wt.% cellulose particles were dispersed in CTAB aqueous solution at CTAB concentration beyond 0.3 mM (not shown). When equal moles of SDS were added (0.3% cellulose particles dispersed in 0.01 mM CTAB + 0.01 mM SDS solution), the IFT (39.0 mN/m) is between the previous two systems. It is believed that the formation of ionic pairs reduces significantly the concentration of free CTAB and SDS, but the ionic pairs are also highly surface-active, which can strongly adsorb at oil–water interface to reduce the IFT.
Table 1
| No. | Composition of aqueous phase | γ/mN/m |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pure water | 52.1 ± 0.1 |
| 2 | 0.3% Cellulose | 48.7 ± 0.1 |
| 3 | 0.01 mM CTAB | 35.8 ± 0.2 |
| 4 | 0.3% Cellulose + 0.01 mM CTAB | 41.8 ± 0.2 |
| 5 | 0.3% Cellulose + 0.01 mM CTAB+0.01 mM SDS | 39.0 ± 0.2 |
Interfacial tension between dodecane and aqueous phase with or without particles and surfactants at 25°C.
Figure 11
Conclusions
A simple protocol has been demonstrated to prepare the stimuli-responsive surface-active MCC particles, which are able to reversibly self-assemble at fluid interface via reversible in situ hydrophobization to stabilize stimuli-responsive Pickering emulsions. The stable Pickering emulsion is obtained by using negatively charged MCC particles in situ hydrophobized with a cationic surfactant in low concentration, whereas demulsification occurs by adding an anionic surfactant of equal moles. The restabilization of the Pickering emulsion is achieved again on addition of extra cationic surfactant which reestablishes the hydrophobization. The stimuli-responsiveness of the emulsions is due to the trigger that the electrostatic interaction between the oppositely charged ionic surfactants is stronger than that between the cationic surfactant and the particle surfaces. The added anionic surfactant prefers to form ion pairs, making cationic surfactant desorb from particle surfaces and particles surface-inactive returning to the water aqueous. This access avoids complicated synthesis of functional switchable particles as well as relative rigorous switching conditions. With excellent biocompatibility, biodegradability, and renewability, as well as low toxicity, the biomass cellulose particles, which are made stimuli-responsive and can then reversibly self-assembling at fluid interface, become ideal biocompatible particulate materials with more potential applications in many fields.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
YZ wrote the manuscript. HD made the additional experiments according to the comments of reviewer. LC tested particles and Pickering emulsion. TC made the stimuli-responsiveness cellulose particles. ZC revised the article. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
Financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 21802075) and funds received for open access publication fees.
Acknowledgments
Financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 21802075) is gratefully acknowledged.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AaenR.BrodinF. W.SimonS.HeggsetE. B.SyverudK. (2019). Oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by cellulosenanofibrils—the effects of ionic strength and pH. Nanomaterials9, 259–272. 10.3390/nano9020259
2
AlfassiG.ReinD. M.CohenY. (2019). Cellulose emulsions and their hydrolysis. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.94, 178–184. 10.1002/jctb.5760
3
AndresenM.SteniusP. (2007). Water-in-oil emulsions stabilized by hydrophobized microfibrillated cellulose. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol.28, 837–844. 10.1080/01932690701341827
4
AnwarN.WilliamsT.GrimmeB.KuehneA. J. C. (2013). Light-switchable and monodisperse conjugated polymer particles. ACS Macro Lett.2, 766–769. 10.1021/mz400362g
5
AveyardR.BinksB. P.ClintJ. H. (2003). Emulsions stabilized solely by colloidal particles. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.10, 503–546. 10.1016/S0001-8686(02)00069-6
6
BaiL.HuanS.-Q.XiangW.-C.RojasO. J. (2018). Pickering Emulsions by combining cellulose nanofibrils and nanocrystals: phase behavior and depletion stabilization. Green Chem.20, 1571–1582. 10.1039/C8GC00134K
7
BaiL.LvS.-S.XiangW.-C.HuanS.-Q.McClementsD. J.RojasO. J. (2019). Oil-in-water pickering emulsions via microfluidization with cellulose nanocrystals: 1. Formation and stability. Food Hydrocoll.96, 699–708. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.04.038
8
BinksB. P.HorozovT. S. (Eds.). (2006). In Colloidal Particles at Liquid Interfaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511536670
9
BinksB. P.MurakamiR.ArmesS. P.FujiiS. (2005). Temperature-induced inversion of nanoparticle-stabilized emulsions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 117, 4873–4876. 10.1002/ange.200501073
10
BinksB. P.MurakamiR.ArmesS. P.FujiiS.SchmidA. (2007). pH-responsive aqueous foams stabilized by ionizable latex particles. Langmuir23, 8691–8694. 10.1021/la700444a
11
BlancoE.LamS.SmoukovS. K.VelikovK. P.KhanS. A.VelevO. D. (2013). Stability and viscoelasticity of magneto-pickering foams. Langmuir29, 10019–10027. 10.1021/la4014224
12
BruggerB.RichteringW. (2007). Magnetic, thermosensitive microgels as stimuli-responsive emulsifiers allowing for remote control of separability and stability of oil-in-water emulsions. Adv. Mater.19, 2973–2978. 10.1002/adma.200700487
13
CherhalF.CousinF.CapronI. (2016). Structural description of the interface of pickering emulsions stabilized by cellulose nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules17, 496–502. 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01413
14
ChingY. C.AliM. D. E.AbdullahL. C.ChooK. W.ChingK. Y.JulaihiS. J.et al. (2016). Rheological properties of cellulose nanocrystal-embedded polymer composites: a review. Cellulose23, 1011–1030. 10.1007/s10570-016-0868-3
15
CostaC.MedronhoB.FilipeA.MiraI.LindmanB.EdlundH.et al. (2019). Emulsion formation and stabilization by biomolecules: the leading role of cellulose. Polymers11, 1570–1587. 10.3390/polym11101570
16
CuiZ.-G.CuiC.-F.ZhuY.BinksB. P. (2012). Multiple phase inversion of emulsions stabilized by in situ surface activation of CaCO3 nanoparticles via adsorption of fatty acids. Langmuir28, 314–320. 10.1021/la204021v
17
CuiZ.-G.YangL.-L.CuiY.-Z.BinksB. P. (2010). Effects of surfactant structure on the phase inversion of emulsions stabilized by mixtures of silica nanoparticles and cationic surfactant. Langmuir26, 4717–4724. 10.1021/la903589e
18
DuffusL. J.NortonJ. E.SmithP.NortonI. T.SpyropoulosF. (2016). A comparative study on the capacity of a range of food-grade particles to form stable O/W and W/O pickering emulsions. J. Colloid Interf. Sci.473, 9–21. 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.03.060
19
FameauA. L.LamS.VelevO. D. (2013). Multi-stimuli responsive foams combining particles and self assembling fatty acids. Chem. Sci.4, 3874–3881. 10.1039/c3sc51774h
20
FujiiS.MochizukiM.AonoK.HamasakiS.MurakamiR.NakamuraY. (2011a). pH-responsive aqueous foams stabilized by hairy latex particles. Langmuir27, 12902–12907. 10.1021/la203062b
21
FujiiS.SuzakiM.ArmesS. P.DupinD.HamasakiS.AonoK.et al. (2011b). Liquid marbles prepared from pH-responsive sterically stabilized latex particles. Langmuir27, 8067–8074. 10.1021/la201317b
22
HuZ.MarwayH. S.KasemH.PeltonR.CranstonE. D. (2016a). Dried and redispersible cellulose nanocrystal pickering emulsions. ACS Macro Lett.5, 185–189. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.5b00919
23
HuZ.PattenT.PeltonR.CranstonE. D. (2015). Synergistic stabilization of emulsions and emulsion gels with water-soluble polymers and cellulose nanocrystals. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.3, 1023–1031. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00194
24
HuZ.XuR.CranstonE. D.PeltonR. (2016b). Stable aqueous foams from cellulose nanocrystals and methyl cellulose. Biomacromolecules17, 4095–4099. 10.1021/acs.biomac.6b01641
25
JiangJ.-Z.ZhuY.CuiZ.-G.BinksB. P. (2013). Switchable pickering emulsions stabilized by silica nanoparticles hydrophobised insitu with a switchable surfactant. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 52, 12373–12376. 10.1002/anie.201305947
26
KumeG.GallottiM.NunesG. (2008). Review on anionic/cationic surfactant mixtures. J. Surf. Det.11, 1–11. 10.1007/s11743-007-1047-1
27
LamS.BlancoE.SmoukovS. K.VelikovK. P.VelevO. D. (2011). Magnetically responsive pickering foams. J. Am. Chem. Soc.133, 13856–13859. 10.1021/ja205065w
28
LamS.VelikovK. P.VelevO. D. (2014). Pickering stabilization of foams and emulsions with particles of biological origin. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci.19, 490–500. 10.1016/j.cocis.2014.07.003
29
LiangC.LiuQ.-X.XuZ.-H. (2014). Surfactant-free switchable emulsions using CO2-responsive particles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces6, 6898–6904. 10.1021/am5007113
30
LinS. J.TheatoP. (2013). CO2-responsive polymers. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 34, 1118–1133. 10.1002/marc.201300288
31
LiuH.WangC.-Y.ZouS.-W.WeiZ.-J.TongZ. (2012). Simple, reversible emulsion system switched by pH on the basis of chitosan without any hydrophobic modification. Langmuir28, 11017–11024. 10.1021/la3021113
32
LiuK.-H.JiangJ.-Z.CuiZ.-G.BinksB. P. (2017). pH-responsive pickering emulsions stabilized by silica nanoparticles in combination with a conventional zwitterionic surfactant. Langmuir33, 2296–2305. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b04459
33
LiuP.-W.LuW.-Q.WangW.-J.LiB.-G.ZhuS.-P. (2014). Highly CO2/N2-switchable zwitterionic surfactant for pickering emulsions at ambient temperature. Langmuir30, 10248–10255. 10.1021/la502749x
34
MorseA. J.ArmesS. P.ThompsonK. L.DupinD.FieldingL. A.MillsP.et al. (2013). Novel pickering emulsifiers based on pH responsive poly(2-(diethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) latexes. Langmuir29, 5466–5475. 10.1021/la400786a
35
NgaiT.BehrensS. H.AuweterH. (2005). Novel emulsions stabilized by pH and temperature sensitive microgels. Chem. Commun.3, 331–333. 10.1039/b412330a
36
OjalaJ.SirviöJ. A.LiimatainenH. (2016). Nanoparticle emulsifiers based on bifunctionalized cellulose nanocrystals as marine diesel oil–water emulsion stabilizers. Chem. Eng. J.312–320. 10.1016/j.cej.2015.10.113
37
QuesadaM.MuniesaC.BotellaP. (2013). Hybrid PLGAO-organosilica nanoparticles with redox-sensitive molecular gates. Chem. Mater.25, 2597–2602. 10.1021/cm400700g
38
RahmanM. M.ChehimiM. M.FessiH.ElaissariA. (2011). Highly temperature responsive core–shell magnetic particles: synthesis, characterization and colloidal properties. J. Colloid Interface Sci.360, 556–564. 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.04.078
39
SaigalT.DongH.-C.MatyjaszewskiK.TiltonR. D. (2010). Pickering emulsions stabilized by nanoparticles with thermally responsive grafted polymer brushes. Langmuir26, 15200–15209. 10.1021/la1027898
40
TahB.PalP.MahatoM.TalapatraG. B. (2011). Aggregation behavior of SDS/CTAB catanionic surfactant mixture in aqueous solution and at the air/water interface. J. Phys. Chem. B115, 8493–8499. 10.1021/jp202578s
41
TanT. T. Y.AhsanA.ReithoferM. R.TayS. W.TanS. Y.HorT. S. A.et al. (2014). Photoresponsive liquid marbles and dry water. Langmuir30, 3448–3454. 10.1021/la500646r
42
TangJ.-T.BerryR. M.TamK. C. (2016). Stimuli-responsive cellulose nanocrystals for surfactant -free oil harvesting. Biomacromolecules17, 1748–1756. 10.1021/acs.biomac.6b00144
43
TangJ.-T.LeeM. F. X.ZhangW.ZhaoB.-X.BerryR. M.TamK. C. (2014). Dual responsive pickering emulsion stabilized by poly[2-(dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate] grafted cellulose nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules15, 3052–3060. 10.1021/bm500663w
44
TangJ.-T.SislerJ.GrishkewichN.TamK. C. (2017). Functionalization of cellulose nanocrystals for advanced applications. J. Colloid Interf. Sci.494, 397–409. 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.01.077
45
TuF.LeeD. (2014). Shape-changing and amphiphilicity-reversing janus particles with pH-responsive surfactant properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc.136, 9999–10006. 10.1021/ja503189r
46
VaranasiS.HenzelL.MendozalL.PrathapanR.BatchelorW.TaborR.et al. (2018). Pickering emulsions electrostatically stabilized by cellulose nanocrystals. Front. Chem.6, 409–417. 10.3389/fchem.2018.00409
47
YamagamiT.KitayamaY.OkuboM. (2014). Preparation of stimuli-responsive mushroom-like janus polymer particles as particulate surfactant by site-selective surface-initiated AGET ATRP in aqueous dispersed systems. Langmuir30, 7823–7832. 10.1021/la501266t
48
YangH.-L.LiangF.-X.WangX.ChenY.ZhangC.-L.WangQ.et al. (2013). Responsive janus composite nanosheets. Macromolecules46, 2754–2759. 10.1021/ma400261y
49
ZhangQ.YuG.-Q.WangW.-J.YuanH.-M.LiB.-G.ZhuS.-P. (2013). Switchable Block copolymer surfactants for preparation of reversibly coagulatable and redispersible poly(methyl methacrylate) latexes. Macromolecules46, 1261–1267. 10.1021/ma302505r
50
ZhuY.FuT.LiuK.-H.LinQ.PeiX.-M.JiangJ.-Z.et al. (2017a). Thermo-responsive pickering emulsions stabilized by silica nanoparticles in combination with alkyl polyoxyethylene ether nonionic surfactant. Langmuir33, 5724–5733. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b00273
51
ZhuY.JiangJ.-.Z.LiuK.-H.CuiZ.-G.BinksB. P. (2015a). Switchable pickering emulsions stabilized by silica nanoparticles hydrophobized in situ with a conventional cationic surfactant. Langmuir31, 3301–3307. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b00295
52
ZhuY.JiangJ.-Z.CuiZ.-G.BinksB. P. (2014). Responsive aqueous foams stabilized by silica nanoparticles hydrophobilised insitu with a switchable surfactant. Soft Matter10, 9739–9745. 10.1039/C4SM01970A
53
ZhuY.LuoX.-G.WuX.LiW.LiB.LuA.et al. (2017b). Cellulose gel dispersions: fascinating green particles for the stabilization of oil/water pickering emulsion. Cellulose24, 207–217. 10.1007/s10570-016-1093-9
54
ZhuY.PeiX.-M.JiangJ.-Z.CuiZ.-G.BinksB. P. (2015b). Responsive aqueous foams stabilized by silica nanoparticles hydrophobised insitu with a conventional surfactant. Langmuir31, 12937–12943. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b03681
55
ZoppeJ. O.VendittiR. A.RojasO. J. (2012). Pickering emulsions stabilized by cellulose nanocrystals grafted with thermo-responsive polymer brushes. J. Colloid Interface Sci.369, 202–209. 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.12.011
Summary
Keywords
biomass cellulose particles, stimuli-responsive Pickering emulsions, in situ hydrophobization, reversibly self-assemble, amphiphiles
Citation
Zhu Y, Chen T, Cui Z, Dai H and Cai L (2020) Stimuli-Responsive Biomass Cellulose Particles Being Able to Reversibly Self-Assemble at Fluid Interface. Front. Chem. 8:712. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00712
Received
25 April 2020
Accepted
09 July 2020
Published
06 October 2020
Volume
8 - 2020
Edited by
Tangxin Xiao, Changzhou University, China
Reviewed by
Jinfeng Dong, Wuhan University, China; Hengquan Yang, Shanxi University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Zhu, Chen, Cui, Dai and Cai.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Tingting Chen ttchen1980@126.comZhenggang Cui cuizhenggang@hotmail.comHong Dai dh123@ntu.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Supramolecular Chemistry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemistry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.