Abstract
A novel 4,4-difuoro-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (BODIPY) copolymer with diethynylbenzene has been synthesised, and its ability to act as a photosensitiser for the photocatalytic generation of hydrogen was investigated by time-resolved spectroscopic techniques spanning the ps- to ns-timescales. Both transient absorption and time-resolved infrared spectroscopy were used to probe the excited state dynamics of this photosensitising unit in a variety of solvents. These studies indicated how environmental factors can influence the photophysics of the BODIPY polymer. A homogeneous photocatalytic hydrogen evolution system has been developed using the BODIPY copolymer and cobaloxime which provides hydrogen evolution rates of 319 μmol h−1 g−1 after 24 h of visible irradiation.
Introduction
Increasing levels of CO2 in the atmosphere has resulted in an increase in the rate of global warming, necessitating a move away from burning fossil fuels. Hydrogen has been proposed as a clean energy vector, which has led to the development of photocatalysts for hydrogen generation (Dalle et al., ; Fajrina and Tahir, ). Many inorganic photosensitisers, based on ruthenium, iridium or rhenium, have been used for hydrogen generating systems in both inter- and intra-molecular assemblies. Knowledge of the photophysics of these systems is essential to “fine tune” the photocatalytic systems and increase their efficiencies (Singh Bindra et al., ; Tong et al., ; Kowacs et al., ; Rommel et al., ; Das et al., ; O'Reilly et al., ). However, these systems have many drawbacks including high cost and inefficient use of the visible light spectrum. Organic photosensitisers for hydrogen evolution are less well-developed, despite a number of welcome attributes, such as low cost (Mishra et al., ; Manton et al., ; Summers et al., ; Luo et al., ; Lai et al., ).
Conjugated polymers offer many advantages over traditional inorganic-based systems for the production of hydrogen. They can facilitate energy transfer along the polymer backbone following photoexcitation, directing it to catalytically active sites for solar-driven hydrogen evolution (Guiglion et al., ; Zhang et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2018, 2019; Xu et al., 2018; Dai and Liu, ; Jayakumar and Chou, ). For instance Zhang et al. reported the use of poly(fluorene-co-phenylene) as a photosensitiser (PS) for hydrogen generation. When used in conjunction with a Ni catalyst and EDTA as a sacrificial agent, efficiencies of up to 429 mmol g−1 h−1 were achieved (Yong et al., 2018). Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) based polymers have also been investigated because of their thermal stability and high hydrogen evolution rates (HER) (Ong et al., ; Wang et al., 2017), although they require post-modification, such as surface functionalisation or surface assembly to maximise hydrogen evolution (Ran et al., ; Wang et al., 2020; Yi et al., 2020). However, harsh reaction conditions are required to synthesise pristine g-C3N4 which limits its application as a photocatalyst (Ong et al., ).
A diverse range of conjugated polymers can be prepared under mild conditions using metal-catalysed cross-coupling reactions. To date, a range of conjugated polymers including linear polymers, conjugated microporous polymers (CMPs) (Sprick et al., ; Liu et al., ), covalent organic frameworks (COFs) (Stegbauer et al., ; Banerjee et al., ; Pachfule et al., ), and covalent triazine frameworks (CTFs) have been reported (Bi et al., ; Li et al., ; Meier et al., ). While there are many limitations with polymeric photocatalysts, such as precise control of molecular weight distribution, there are also many advantages, including the ability to establish structure-activity relationships by incorporating different molecular building blocks (Woods et al., 2020). The first report of tunable organic polymers for hydrogen evolution was presented by Cooper et al. who developed pyrene-based conjugated polymers with various monomeric compositions and optical gaps ranging from 1.94 to 2.95 eV (Sprick et al., ). The optical gap of the polymer is a key determinant of their efficiency as photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution. For instance, adding various co-monomers in the preparation of poly(p-phenylene) enhanced hydrogen evolution. The highest activity was observed with incorporation of a dibenzo[b, d] thiophene sulfone moiety, yielding an evolution rate of 92 μmol h−1, compared to 2.0 μmol h−1 for the homopolymer (Sprick et al., ). The superior performance of conjugated polymers and their successful use as photosensitisers has been explained by both their light-harvesting and electron transport capabilities (Chen et al., ; Jiang and McNeill, ). Certain barriers to improvement of photocatalytic activities or organic polymers remain however. A reduction in exciton binding energies for subsequent charge-carrier generation is required to improve the viability of polymer systems for hydrogen generation.
BODIPY dyes (Figure 1A) are one of the most extensively studied chromophores in recent years, due to ease of synthesis, thermal stability and solubility in a range of organic solvents (Wan et al., 2003; Azov et al., ; Ziessel et al., 2005; Kim et al., ; Loudet and Burgess, ). A variety of BODIPY architectures have been developed, involving substitution at the meso position, the pyrrole unit (β position), the boron atom, as well as post-functionalisation and polymerisation at the periphery of the chromophore (Figure 1B) (Ulrich et al., 2008; Boens et al., , ; Zhao et al., 2015; Zhang and Zhu, 2019).
Figure 1
Absorption and emission properties of BODIPYs may vary with substituents on the BODIPY core, e.g., iodine or alkyl groups (Banfi et al., ). Synthetic modifications at the meso position have less effect on the photophysical properties of the BODIPY however (Guzow et al., ; Banfi et al., ). Copolymerisation of the BODIPY core at the 2 and 6 position can form linear copolymers (Alemdaroglu et al., ; Donuru et al., ,). BODIPY polymers of this type have applications in areas, such as optoelectronics, organic field transistors, batteries, photovoltaics, and cellular imaging (Squeo et al., ), however their use in hydrogen evolution reactions (HER) is the focus of this manuscript. BODIPY monomers and iodinated BODIPY monomers have been used in homogeneous photocatalytic hydrogen evolution, including both intermolecular (Luo et al., ; Sabatini et al., ; Dura et al., ; Xie et al., 2019) and intramolecular systems (Lazarides et al., ; Bartelmess et al., ; Luo et al., ; Zheng et al., 2015). Some heterogeneous systems incorporating BODIPY a chromophore onto TiO2 surfaces have been shown to lead to H2 evolution (Sabatini et al., ; Suryani et al., ). BODIPY dyes have been immobilised onto photocathodes including NiO (Summers et al., ; Black et al., ). Limitations in the systems described to date include the narrow absorption profiles of BODIPY chromophores, instability upon irradiation, fast rate of charge recombination and insufficient charge-separated state lifetimes.
Based on the features of the best performing chromophores, we have designed a novel conjugated copolymer containing the BODIPY core unit in the polymer backbone (Figure 1B), which absorb strongly in in the region of the solar irradiance spectrum. Irradiation of this polymer produces a long-lived triplet excited state, which in the presence a cobaloxime molecular catalyst acts as an effective hydrogen evolution catalyst. We also report the first time-resolved study of BODIPY based copolymers using transient absorption and time-resolved infrared spectroscopy to investigate the early-time photodynamics in a range of solvents for comparison with the parent BODIPY monomer.
Materials and Methods
All solvents were supplied by Aldrich Chemicals Co.® and anhydrous solvents containing sure/seal® were used under the flow of nitrogen. [3-(trimethylsilyl)ethynylbenzaldehyde] was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received. Reagents were obtained commercially from Aldrich Chemicals Co®., ABCR®, Honeywell Fluka®, Flourochem Ltd.® and were used without any further purification.
Physical Measurements
1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on either a Bruker 400 or 600 MHz spectrometer and were referenced to the deuterated solvent peak as an internal reference. Mass spectra were measured on a waters Q-TOF 6200 series. All UV spectra were recorded on the Agilent 8453 UV-vis spectrophotometer equipped with Agilent ChemStation software. FTIR measurements were carried out on Perkin-Elmer 2000 FTIR spectrophotometer in a liquid solution cell using spectrophotometric grade dichloromethane. All excitation spectra, emission spectra, emission maps and time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) lifetimes were carried out using a FLS1000 photoluminescence spectrometer (Edinburgh instruments), equipped with a Xe Arc lamp for steady-state measurements and a visible PMT-900 detector. All data analysis carried out using Floracle® software. All samples were measured at room temperature and were purged with N2 prior analysis. For TCSPC, a 510 nm variable pulse length diode laser (VPL-510) was utilised to excite the ground state sample. The accuracy of the fit of the decays was judged by chi-squared (χ2) and sum of residuals was always χ2 < 1.1. The fluorescence decay time (τ) was obtained from the slope of the decay curve. Accumulation of the steady-state spectra was obtained using 1 s dwell time and ×2 repeats per spectrum. All samples were measured in a 1 × 1 cm quartz cuvette and samples were <0.2 at 510 nm to ensure an optically dilute solution to avoid inner-filter effects. Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) was used to determine the dispersities (ÐM) and molecular weights of polymers. SEC was conducted in 1,1,1,3,3,3-Hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFiP) using an PSS SECurity SEC system equipped with a PFG 7 μm 8 × 50 mm pre-column, a PSS 100 Å, 7 μm 8 × 300 mm and a PSS 1,000 Å, 7 μm 8 × 300 mm column in series and a differential refractive index (RI) detector at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1. The systems were calibrated against Agilent Easi-Vial linear poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) standards and analysed by the software package PSS winGPC UniChrom.
Synthesis
3-TMS BODIPY monomer and 3-TMS diiodo BODIPY monomer were synthesised as per previously reported methods and spectroscopic results are consistent with the literature (Godoy et al., ; Li et al., ). We report the first synthesis of 3-TMS BODIPY polymer using a previously reported method for the Sonogashira polycondensation reaction (Donuru et al., ). The synthetic procedures used for the synthesis of all compounds are detailed in the Supporting Information.
Fluorescence Quantum Yield Calculations
Steady-state fluorescence measurements were recorded using the LS50B luminescence spectrophotometer. Prior to obtaining the emission spectra, samples were diluted to ~0.2 abs units at λexc using the UV-vis spectrometer to inhibit inner-filter effect. The reference compound used was previously reported by Banfi et al. (3-pyridine H-BODIPY, Φfl = 0.62 in CH2Cl2) (Banfi et al., ). An excitation wavelength of 490 nm and a slit width of 2.5 nm was used for the samples and the standards. The compounds were measured in aerated solution at room temperature. Spectroscopic CH2Cl2 was the solvent used for all samples and standards. The emission quantum yield was the measured as per the following Equation (1):
Where Isample and Istandard is the integrated area under the emission curve when the sample was excited at 490 nm. Abs denotes the optical density of the sample solution at the excitation wavelength.
Fluorescence Lifetime Measurements
Fluorescence lifetimes were fitted using Floracle® software to either a simple monoexponential or the following bi-exponential formula (2):
where the contribution (% relatively) of each of the different components is B1 and B2, respectively.
Singlet Oxygen Quantum Yield Calculations
The singlet oxygen (1Δg) quantum yield (ΦΔ) was measured using zinc meso-tetraphenylporphyrin (ZnTPP) in CHCl3 as the standard (ΦΔ = 0.72) (Redmond and Gamlin, ). The singlet oxygen near infrared emission (NIR) spectra were recorded using an Andor InGaAs detector coupled with a Shamrock 163 Spectrograph. The excitation sources were supplied by Thorlabs and the monochromatic line used was a 530 nm diode laser. All UV-vis spectra were recorded both before and after singlet oxygen measurements, the optical density of standards and samples were 0.3 absorption units at the excitation wavelength (λexc = 530 nm). Standard and sample measurements were run under identical experimental conditions employing the same solvent, excitation source, LED exposure time and accumulation cycles to allow for direct comparison of NIR emission spectra. The NIR emission spectra was then integrated using baseline correction software in the region of λ1 = 1,230 nm to λ2 = 1,330 nm and ΦΔ calculated using the following Equation (3):
Where Φref is the singlet oxygen quantum yield of the standard, Areasample and Arearef are the integrated area between 1,230 and 1,330 nm of the phosphorescence of singlet oxygen, respectively, Absref and Abssample are the absorption of both solutions at the wavelength of excitation.
ps-Transient Absorption Measurements and ps-Time Resolved Infrared Measurements
ps-TA and ps-TRIR spectra were recorded using the ULTRA instrument at the Central Laser Facility in the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in the U.K. and has been described elsewhere (Greetham et al., ).
ns-Transient Absorption Measurements
ns transient absorption data were recorded on the LP980 transient absorption spectrometer (Edinburgh Instruments), λexc = 355 nm. All samples were degassed using three freeze-pump thaw cycles prior to sample measurement. The optical density of the sample was ~0.3 at 355 nm prior to transient absorption measurement on the LP980. Samples were checked for photodegradation by comparing UV-vis absorbance spectra before and after TA measurements and no changes were observed.
Photocatalytic Homogeneous H2 Evolution Experiments
For photocatalytic hydrogen evolution, each sample was prepared in a 23 mL glass Schlenk tube stoppered with an air-tight rubber septum. Prior to sample preparation, an aqueous solution of 0.2 M ascorbic acid was adjusted to the desired pH value by titrating the solution with an appropriate amount of 0.2 M NaOH solution. The polymer and the catalyst were dissolved in 4 mL of organic solvent (either CH3CN or THF) followed by addition of 4 mL of the ascorbic acid solution to yield an 8 mL 1:1 (v/v) mixture of organic solvent and aqueous ascorbic acid solution (0.1 M final concentration of ascorbic acid). The components were dissolved in the photocatalytic solution, and degassed using three freeze-pump thaw cycles prior to irradiation. The solution based photocatalytic experiments (λ > 420 nm) were all conducted for a period of 24 h using a 300 W Xe arc lamp. All experiments for the detection of hydrogen evolution were carried out in triplicate. At each timepoint reported, 1 mL of the headspace from the Schlenk flask was injected onto the GC to quantify the amount of H2 produced. For the heterogeneous photocatalysis on NiO, the reaction cell was degassed for at least 15 min with either nitrogen or argon. Aqueous electrolytes were freshly prepared and pH adjusted with concentrated HCl, and measured with a benchtop pH meter (Hanna Instruments). The cell was irradiated with simulated 1 sun intensity light (AM 1.5, 100 mW cm−2) using a 300 W Xe arc lamp (Oriel Instruments). Hydrogen was detected with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) with the system operating at 80°C. Gas sampling was done in flow, through an integrated cell block (Supplementary Figure 44). Further details can be found in Supporting Information.
Results and Discussions
Synthesis
The synthesis of the BODIPY polymer was achieved in three steps (Figure 2), via initial synthesis of the BODIPY monomer (Banfi et al., ) and subsequent iodination at the 2 and 6 position (3-TMS diiodo BODIPY). The polymer (Mn = 7.5 kDa, Ð* = 1.4, see Supplementary Figure 8) was synthesised using Sonogashira polycondensation between the iodinated BODIPY core and a 1,4-diethynylbenzyl linker to yield the 3-TMS BODIPY polymer depicted in Figure 2 (herein referred to as polymer). The resulting polymeric material exhibits a bimodal molecular weight distribution. SEC analysis confirmed the successful formation of polymeric structures well-beyond the oligomer regime with a bimodal molecular weight distribution (Supplementary Figure 8).
Figure 2
UV-Visible and Emission Spectroscopy
The UV-visible and emission spectra of the monomer and polymer are presented in Figure 3 (recorded in CH2Cl2). The spectrum indicated with a solid red line corresponds to the absorption spectrum of the monomer. This spectrum displays the characteristic narrow absorption band of the BODIPY core (λmax = 503 nm; FWHMabs = 768 cm−1) which has been assigned to a S0 to S1 π-π* transition. A weak shoulder is observed at 470 nm attributed to the S0-S2 (π-π* transition). The associated emission spectrum (dashed red line) also displays the characteristic sharp band, λmax, at 516 nm representing a Stokes shift of 501 cm−1, within the range typical for BODIPY materials. This indicates only a small change in dipole moment (or geometry) in transition from the ground to the excited state (Luo et al., ).
Figure 3
The fluorescence quantum yield for the monomer is high (Φfl = 92% Table 1), in agreement with the literature (Ulrich et al., 2008; Zhang and Zhu, 2019). The UV spectrum of the polymer is presented as the solid blue feature in Figure 3 (with additional spectra in various solvents presented in Supplementary Figure 11). The increased π-conjugation along the polymer backbone also results in a broadening of the BODIPY absorption (Alemdaroglu et al., ; Meng et al., ; Khetubol et al., ). The lowest energy absorption feature of the polymer is broad (FWHMabs = 2,209 cm−1), with the λmax is red-shifted by 36 nm compared to the monomer. A new intense feature is present at about 350 nm, which is also displayed in the excitation spectrum of the polymer (Supplementary Figure 13). In addition, the lowest energy absorption band is partially resolved into two features in some solvents, indicating the existence of different environments for the BODIPY moiety along the polymer backbone. In this regard, the BODIPY unit is acting as a probe to the various environments on the polymer, and these environments have a dramatic effect on the photophysical behaviour of the BODIPY chromophore. The emission spectrum of the polymer is also broadened compared to the monomer with a larger Stokes shift of 1,101 cm−1 (Table 1). The emission maximum of the polymer is shifted some 57 nm to the red compared to the monomer and the emission band extends to 700 nm. These observations are consistent with other studies on polymeric BODIPY systems and again implies the presence of a multiple of environments for the BODIPY chromophore (Bucher et al., ). The fluorescence quantum yield of the polymer is greatly reduced compared to the monomer (Φfl = 0.09, Table 1). It appears that incorporation of a conjugated linker unit is important in modulating the photophysical properties of BODIPY polymers and reducing the luminescence of the BODIPY core (Alemdaroglu et al., ).
Table 1
| Compound | λabs (nm) | λem (nm)a | Stokes shift Δν (cm−1)b | Optical gap (eV)c | τs (ns)g | τT (μs)h | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monomer | 503 | 516 | 501 | 2.41 | 0.92 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 4.3 | – |
| Polymer | 539 | 572 | 1101 | 2.19 | 0.09 | 0.91 | 0.77 | 1.1, 3.9 | 61 |
Photophysical properties of the monomer and polymer.
All spectra were recorded in CH2Cl2 at room temperature.
Wavelength used to excite the compound correlated to the absorption maxima of each compound, respectively.
Stokes shift.
Calculated from the onset of absorption spectrum (Wanwong et al., 2016) (Supplementary Figure 30).
Flourescence quantum yield calculated using 3-pyridine H-BODIPY as a reference standard, where Φfl = 62% in CH2Cl2 (Banfi et al., ), detailed in the experimental section.
Intersystem crossing efficiency, approximated by the Ermolev's rule: ΦISC = 1 – Φfl (Wu et al., 2011).
Singlet oxygen quantum yield.
Obtained from TCSPC technique in CH2Cl2.
Obtained from transient absorption spectroscopy, λexc 355 nm, sample degassed using freeze-pump thaw method.
The emission spectra of the polymer were relatively insensitive to the nature of the solvent (Figure 4A) implying that BODIPY emission occurs from only selective environments. However, a slight hypsochromic shift (ca.−9 nm) is observed in acetonitrile compared to other solvents (571–574 nm, Table 2). The emission map (Figure 4B) follows closely the absorption profile of the ground state, indicating coupling of the chromophores responsible for the two lowest energy features in the absorption spectrum to the emissive state.
Figure 4
Table 2
| Compound | Solvent | (nm) | (ns) | % rel τ1 | (ns) | % rel τ2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monomer | CH2Cl2 | 513 | – | – | 4.3 | 100 |
| Polymer | CH2Cl2 | 572 | 1.1 | 8.7 | 3.9 | 91.3 |
| THF | 573 | 0.8 | 9.4 | 3.8 | 90.6 | |
| CHCl3 | 574 | 0.7 | 7.4 | 4.2 | 92.6 | |
| CH3CN | 568 | 0.8 | 14.5 | 3.6 | 85.5 | |
| DMSO | 570 | 0.8 | 25.6 | 3.5 | 74.4 | |
| DMF | 572 | 0.4 | 27.8 | 3.8 | 72.2 |
Fluorescence decay lifetimes of the monomer and polymer using 510 nm LED diode.
λem (nm): emission wavelength (at the maximum intensity).
τfl (ns): fluorescence lifetimes.
Fluorescence Lifetime Analysis Using TCSPC
The fluorescence lifetime (τfl) of the monomer was measured in dichloromethane solution. The luminescence decay follows a single exponential profile yielding a τfl of 4.3 ns (Supplementary Figure 25), typical of emission from the lowest energy singlet excited state (Krumova and Cosa, ). As mentioned above the quantum yield for fluorescence is much lower for the polymer and the fluorescence decay shows a biexponential profile, comprising a fast process with τfl on the order of 1 ns or less, and a slower process with a lifetime similar to that of the singlet emission from the monomer (τfl ≈ 4 ns). The lifetimes were measured in a variety of solvents and these data are presented in Table 2. It is clear that while the lifetimes of the two decay processes are largely insensitive to the solvent, however the relative proportions of the two decay processes vary. The fast process contributes more in DMF or DMSO than it does in CH2Cl2 or THF (Figure 5). These observations can be explained by proposing that the singlet emission only occurs from selective environments on the polymer, which do not facilitate intersystem crossing (ISC) to the triplet surface (Chen et al., ). The proportion of the excited BODIPY centres, which undergo singlet emission, is strongly affected by the interaction between the polymer and the solvent. This explains the substantial decrease in Φfl for the polymer compared to the monomer. The majority of excited BODIPY centres can undergo charge transfer processes along the conjugated polymer which promotes ISC (Filatov, ). More details of the emission decay profiles are presented in the supporting information (Supplementary Figures 26–29).
Figure 5
Biexponential decays have previously been reported for other BODIPY polymers and are consistent with the results in this study (Economopoulos et al., ). For instance Donuru et al. (), reported a lifetime of τ = 4.1 ns for a BODIPY monomer, and a lifetime of τ = 1.1 ns in the resulting polymer. Other reports also follow similar trends of a decreased lifetimes for polymeric materials (Donuru et al., ). Douhal et al. reported three lifetime components for another conjugated BODIPY copolymer, τ1 = 0.22 ns, τ2= 0.7 ns, and τ3 = 4.3 ns in CH2Cl2, λexc = 371 nm (Piatkowski et al., ). The latter two lifetimes are similar to those obtained in this work (Table 2) and it is possible that a third lifetime component exists for our polymer but on a timescale shorter than the instrument response time of 50 ps (see the transient absorption results outlined below).
Transient Absorption Spectroscopy
To investigate the early excited state dynamics, ps-ns transient absorption (TA) measurements were undertaken on the polymer in a range of solvents including CD3CN, DMSO, CHCl3, and CH2Cl2. Figure 6A displays the colour 2-D TA plot for the polymer following excitation at 525 nm in CD3CN and Figure 6B contains the corresponding time-resolved spectra. To aid in spectral interpretation the ground state absorption spectrum of the polymer (blue dashed line) and emission spectra (green dashed line) are plotted. The region of most interest is indicated with a downward arrow, while the region close to the upward arrow is subject to distortions because of emission.
Figure 6
Excitation results in a ground state bleach (GSB) around 540 nm and the formation of an excited state absorption (ESA) at ~435 nm (Figure 6B). The ESA at 435 nm decays with three decay components (Figure 6B) with τ1 = 6 ± 1 ps, and τ2 = 404 ± 32 ps, and a third component with τ3 > 3 ns (Table 3). Supplementary Figure 32 shows the additional TA spectra obtained in DMSO, CHCl3, and CH2Cl2, all of which exhibit similar spectral features. The longer of these lifetimes are similar to those obtained in the emission studies described above (Table 2). The first component (τ1), with lifetimes in the range 6–18 ps, is too short-lived to be detected in the luminescence studies. The time scale for this species is within the range of vibrational relaxation, however the spectroscopic behavior of the bands is not typical of this process, and another possibility is structural relaxation of the BODIPY polymer (Kee et al., ; Suhina et al., ). The second component (τ2) in the range 400–1,400 ps corresponds to the fast component in the emission lifetime studies. The more rapid excited state decay in the more polar solvents suggests that the excited state is quenched by electron transfer to form a charge-separated triplet state, which is facilitated by polymer-solvent interactions. The absorption of the triplet species persisted to >3 ns after excitation, as did the GSB. Triplet excited state formation is also observed in other heavy-atom-free BODIPY photosensitisers (Filatov, ). Halogenated BODIPY monomers also have an ESA feature in this region attributed to the formation of a triplet excited state (Sabatini et al., ; Lee et al., ).
Table 3
| Solvent | τ1 (ps) | τ2 (ps) |
|---|---|---|
| CD3CN | 6 ± 1 | 404 ± 32 |
| DMSO | 18 ± 3 | 522 ± 56 |
| CHCl3 | 15 ± 2 | 784 ± 56 |
| CD2Cl2 | 9 ± 1 | 1359 ± 291 |
Summary of the lifetimes in the TAS experiments for the ESA feature at ~445 nm (using a biexponential function) following excitation at 525 nm.
Figure 6D displays the decay associated spectra (DAS) for the polymer in CD3CN. The DAS spectra exhibit the amplitude (ai) of each lifetime component (τi) along the absorption spectral window in the experimental set-up. The τ1 DAS is dominated by a positive feature at 464 nm and, a negative feature corresponding to the GSB at ~546 nm. This initial species absorbs to the red of the parent and of the second species populated. The τ2 DAS is structurally similar showing a slight blue shift of the ESA feature on the higher energy side of the spectra ca.−18 nm. Finally, a positive feature is also present in the τ3 DAS centered at 455 nm and persists on the ns-timescale. Consequently, we can assign the long-time life component to the absorption of a triplet state, which is further supported by ns-TA experiments.
For comparison, TAS was also carried out with the parent BODIPY monomer and the diiodo monomer in CD3CN, following excitation at 525 nm (Supplementary Figures 34, 35). The lifetime obtained for the BODIPY monomer (τ ~ 4 ns), is consistent with the population of the S1 state, followed by relaxation to the ground state. The GSB feature of the diiodo BODIPY monomer is long-lived and did not decay within the timeframe of the experiment. In the TA spectra for the diiodo BODIPY dye concurrent with decay of the band initially observed at 460 nm, a further band grows in at ~430 nm over ca. 50 ps (that is absent in the BODIPY monomer) that persists beyond the experimental times used (2 ns). This is attributed to ISC with formation of the triplet state which is characteristic of heavy-atom BODIPY analogues (Sabatini et al., ).
Time-resolved experiments on the polymer in CH3CN, using ns laser pulses confirmed the formation of a long-lived excited state consistent with it being a triplet species with τT = 60 μs. The ns-TA spectrum (Figure 7) exhibits a broad GSB in addition to two ESA features at ~435 and 585 nm, which resembles the final spectrum obtained in the ps-TA experiments described above. The triplet lifetime of 60 μs is similar to triplet state lifetimes measured for other conjugated polymers containing thiophene and fluorene moieties previously measured (20–120 μs) (Yong et al., 2018). Lifetimes in the range 450–710 μs have been reported for polymers with pendant iodo-substituted BODIPY units (Zhang et al., 2020). Triplet excited state species have also been observed for a BODIPY polymer containing an ethynyl thiophene linker (Bucher et al., ). The singlet oxygen quantum yield for the polymer (ΦΔ = 0.77, Table 1) represents more than a 10-fold increase over the singlet oxygen quantum yield of the monomer (ΦΔ = 0.05, Table 1) (Supplementary Figure 24) (DeRosa and Crutchley, ; McDonnell et al., ).
Figure 7
Time Resolved Infrared Spectroscopy
Time resolved infrared spectroscopy (TRIR) was also carried out on the polymer on the ps to ns timescales following excitation at 525 nm (in a range of solvents; DMSO, CD3CN, CHCl3, and CD2Cl2). A representative FTIR spectrum for the polymer is displayed in Supplementary Figure 9, in conjunction with 1,4-diethynylbenzene which was used in the synthesis of the polymer.
Immediately following excitation, a depletion is evident at ~1547 cm−1 together with new bands at 1267, 1362, and 1452 (broad) cm−1 which are assigned to a singlet excited state of the BODIPY. Previously electron transfer dynamics for BODIPY chromophores in CH2Cl2 have been reported, with a GSB at 1543 cm−1, and ESA features at 1339, 1297, and 1507 cm−1, respectively (Schoder et al., ). These spectroscopic features produced within the instrument response time in our studies, have identical lifetimes [τ = 25 (±5) ps] and are assigned to a singlet excited state (Black et al., ). However, for the polymer in this study, additional positive features develop, principally that at 1316 cm−1 which is fully formed within 1 ns and persists on the ns-timescale. We have assigned these features to a triplet excited state. Because of the substantial band overlap, accurate kinetic data could not be obtained for the growth of the triplet species, however it is clear that it forms at a rate similar to the fast decay component in the emission lifetime measurements Figure 8A.
Figure 8
Figure 8B displays the spectra obtained in the region where carbon-carbon triple bonds absorb. Following excitation of the polymer in CHCl3 (FTIR, Supplementary Figure 9) a positive feature was produced at 2,023 cm−1. The equivalent feature for the ground state polymer is observed at 2,339 cm−1. The substantial shift of this feature points to charge transfer from the triplet bond to the BODIPY unit in the excited state (Zhu et al., 2008, 2017; Bandyopadhyay et al., ). Kinetic analysis of the signal at 2,023 cm−1 reveals two decay lifetimes, τ1 = 13 ± 2 ps and τ2 = 757 ± 62 ps corresponding to vibrational relaxation, and ISC to the triplet surface, respectively. These lifetimes are consistent with those obtained in the TA experiments. Following ISC, a product feature persists to the ns timescale as expected for a triplet species.
TRIR studies were also performed using the diiodo BODIPY monomer. Following excitation, the diiodo monomer displayed a bleach at 1538 cm−1 and positive bands at 1488 and 1442 (broad) cm−1 (Supplementary Figure 38). After ca. 30 ps, two additional bands form at 1525 and 1370 cm−1, respectively and persist beyond the timeframe of the experiment. TRIR spectra of the BODIPY monomer under identical experimental conditions reveal a monoexponential decay of the band at 1540 cm−1, characteristic of BODIPY monomers. This indicates the decay of the singlet excited state, with no evidence for features which could be assigned to a triplet species (Supplementary Figure 39). TRIR spectra of the monomer and diiodo monomer in the carbon-carbon triple bond region were, as expected, featureless (Supplementary Figure 40).
Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation Studies
Solution Studies
The polymer was assessed for hydrogen generation with cobaloxime as the catalyst, under both basic and acidic conditions. No hydrogen evolution was detected in CH3CN under visible light irradiation (λ > 420 nm) when triethylamine was used as the sacrificial agent (SA). The polymer was unstable under these conditions as verified by UV/visible spectroscopy. However, using ascorbic acid as the SA, hydrogen evolution (ca. 108 μ mol h−1 g−1) was observed under visible light irradiation (λ > 420 nm) (Suryani et al., ; Xie et al., 2019).
The efficiency of hydrogen generation was investigated by varying the pH of the ascorbic acid solution added to the 8 mL 1:1 (v/v) photocatalytic solution. Preliminary photocatalysis experiments were carried out using 0.1 M ascorbic acid solution that was adjusted to a pH of ~2 prior to addition to the photocatalytic solution. It is assumed under these reaction conditions that ascorbic acid exists in its fully protonated form, H2A (Supplementary Figure 42, pKa = 4.17) (Pellegrin and Odobel, ). When we adjusted the pH of the ascorbic acid solution from 2 to 5 prior to sample preparation, an increase in hydrogen evolution (0.2–108 μ mol h−1 g−1, respectively, Supplementary Table 3) was observed. While we cannot accurately determine the pH value of the final photocatalytic solution, it is assumed that the decreased degree of acidity in the later photocatalytic solution results in monoprotic ascorbate anion (HA−) as the dominating species. HA− has previously been reported as a stronger reducing agent than the corresponding pronated form of the sacrificial agent, suggesting a plausible reason for the enhancement of hydrogen activity (Creutz, ; Reynal et al., ).
Changing the solvent system from a 1:1 CH3CN/H2O (v/v) 0.1 M ascorbic acid solution to a 1:1 THF/H2O (v/v) 0.1 M ascorbic acid solution resulted in an increase in hydrogen generation from 108 μ mol h−1 g−1 after 24 h of irradiation to 152 μmol h−1 g−1 (Figure 9). Solvent effects are well-known to affect hydrogen generation and THF has been previously reported to be the solvent of choice for photocatalytic systems utilising BODIPY chromophores (Artero et al., ; Suryani et al., ). Furthermore, upon increasing the concentration of the polymer from 0.06 to 0.25 mg/mL (Figure 10), the amount of H2 evolved increased from 3,645 to 7,664 μmol g−1, with a corresponding increase in hydrogen turnover frequency of 152–319 μmol h−1 g−1 after 24 h.
Figure 9
Figure 10
At low concentration, the turnover frequency (TOF) increases until 8 h of irradiation, after which the activity decreases. At 24 h, the TOF is low and no further H2 is evolved, indicating degradation of the catalyst. Cobaloxime catalysts are known to have limited stability (Lazarides et al., ; Willkomm and Reisner, 2018). A summary of all photocatalytic conditions and hydrogen evolution graphs can be found in supporting information (Supplementary Figure 41 and Supplementary Table 3), and a summary of hydrogen evolution rates of organic polymers can be found in Supplementary Table 4. The majority of hydrogen evolution studies using polymeric materials require a precious metal co-catalyst. For example a polybenzothiadazole conjugated network required the addition of 3 wt% Pt to yield a hydrogen evolution rate of 116 μmol h−1 (Yang et al., 2016). The most notable difference between the polymer reported in this study and those reported in the literature to date, is the solubility of the polymer in a wide range of organic solvents. This offers the potential of further processing, for example post-functionalisation or further fabrication onto a photocathode surface. Post-functionalisation options include displacement of the TMS group, and addition of a carboxylic acid anchoring group to facilitate surface attachment (Ho et al., ).
Immobilisation Studies
While the mechanistic insights leading to the augmented activity of proton reduction using polymeric photosensitisers remains unclear, some limitations of polymeric species have been described, including the dispersion of the polymers in aqueous solution and hence separation of excitons, leading to enhanced charge carriers generated. The limitations associated with dispersion may be overcome if the polymer is cast as a thin film, or furthermore, immobilised onto a surface, such as NiO (Summers et al., ; Woods et al., 2017). This strategy may increase the stability of the polymer and also improve photon absorption, as an increase in conjugation on the surface (owed to more π-π stacking on the surface) will likely decrease the optical band gap. The importance of processability and incorporation of polymeric units onto thin films has previously been acknowledged in other work with polymers for hydrogen evolution (Woods et al., 2017).
Some preliminary studies were performed where the polymer was co-adsorbed in the first instance with 4,4′-dicarboxy-2,2′-bipyridine platinum dichloride as a catalyst for H2 evolution. Photoelectrocatalysis experiments were carried at pH 5 in aqueous phthalate buffer due to problems with desorption at higher or lower pH. Optimum photocurrent was detected under these conditions. The absorption spectrum of the BODIPY polymer on NiO is largely consistent with that in solution, showing a broad absorption (Supplementary Figure 45). The Pt-catalyst was difficult to co-adsorb on the NiO films due to limited solubility, but it was possible to confirm the presence of this additional layer with absorption spectroscopy and Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis in conjunction with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of the films. Representative examples of chronoamperometry measurements for the sensitised NiO films are shown in the supporting information (Supplementary Figures 48, 49). Linear sweep voltammetry allowed us to determine a safe bias potential to apply to the system without permanent reduction of species at the electrode surface. This was optimised to a value of −0.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl. It is also important to account for charging on the electrode surface at the beginning of each experiment. Control experiments confirmed that bare NiO did not produce any current due to irradiation with light, ruling out light absorbing impurities in the NiO. For the films with the BODIPY polymer and catalyst, over the timescale of the experiments (~40 min) the photocurrent of the system decreased gradually once the period of continuous illumination commenced. The chronoamperometry measurements were concurrent with gas sampling for H2 using the in-flow setup. While the in-flow gas sampling setup is more rigorous than headspace sampling, only trace amounts of H2 were detected in the experiments (possibly due to the detection limit of the system), yet bubbles were generated on the NiO surface during the experiment. Extended irradiation experiments up to 2 h 15 min did not see an increase in the amount of hydrogen detected. Chronoamperometry measurements of the polymer with the Pt-catalyst show an initial current density of ~18 μA cm−2, but this decreased to ~2.5 μA cm−2 after an initial decay (Supplementary Figure 48). There are many possible losses in the system due to dye/catalyst desorption and reaction. Surface wetting is also a consideration as bubbles of gas can become stuck on the electrode surface. Future research will necessitate identifying a more suitable co-catalyst with better loading on the NiO surface. Few easily synthesised examples of such catalysts with suitable anchoring groups exist, even fewer derived from earth abundant metals. Alternative strategies, such as surface treatments to improve wetability or doping the NiO with graphene to improve charge transport and dye loading are also attractive alternatives (Zannotti et al., 2019) but beyond the scope of the present study.
Conclusion
In summary, the synthesis, characterisation, and photophysical properties of a TMS-BODIPY monomer and a novel TMS-BODIPY copolymer is reported. Modification of the BODIPY monomer facilitating close proximity of multiple chromophores in a polymeric backbone led to significant changes in the photophysical properties. Time-resolved techniques, such as TA and TRIR identified both singlet and triplet excited states and the related kinetics of these species. The photophysics of this polymer are sensitive to the surrounding solvent, facilitating transition to the triplet excited state via a charge transfer state. Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution studies in solution demonstrated that hydrogen evolution occurs using visible light in solution. This work shows that BODIPY copolymers can act as effective photosensitisers for hydrogen evolution, and how they can be used in artificial photosynthetic applications.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
MP and AC: synthesis, time resolved studies, and photocatalysis. LO'R, MP, and GG: time resolved studies. KH: synthesis. CL: time resolved studies/Glotoran. EG and JK: photocatalysis. AH and RM: polymer MW. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge funding provided by the Irish Research Council Enterprise Scheme to AC (EPSPG/2016/158), and IRC Horizons Funding (REPRO/2016/84 to KH), and HYLANTIC-EAPA_204/2016. The authors also thank the STFC Central Laser Facility for granting access to the ULTRA system under EU Access Grant (2019 No. 19230040).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2020.584060/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AlemdarogluF. E.AlexanderS. C.JiD.PrustyD. K.BorschM.HerrmannA. (2009). Poly(BODIPY)S: a new class of tunable polymeric dyes. Macromolecules42, 6529–6536. 10.1021/ma900727k
2
ArteroV.Chavarot-KerlidouM.FontecaveM. (2011). Splitting water with cobalt. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.50, 7238–7266. 10.1002/anie.201007987
3
AzovV. A.SchlegelA.DiederichF. (2005). Geometrically precisely defined multinanometer expansion/contraction motions in a resorcin[4]arene cavitand based molecular switch. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.44, 4635–4638. 10.1002/anie.200500970
4
BandyopadhyayS.AnilA. G.JamesA.PatraA. (2016). Multifunctional porous organic polymers: tuning of porosity, CO2, and H2 storage and visible-light-driven photocatalysis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces8, 27669–27678. 10.1021/acsami.6b08331
5
BanerjeeT.HaaseF.SavasciG.GottschlingK.OchsenfeldC.LotschB. V. (2017). Single-site photocatalytic H2 evolution from covalent organic frameworks with molecular cobaloxime co-catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc.139, 16228–16234. 10.1021/jacs.7b07489
6
BanfiS.NasiniG.ZazaS.CarusoE. (2013). Synthesis and photo-physical properties of a series of BODIPY dyes. Tetrahedron69, 4845–4856. 10.1016/j.tet.2013.04.064
7
BartelmessJ.FrancisA. J.El RozK. A.CastellanoF. N.WeareW. W.SommerR. D. (2014). Light-driven hydrogen evolution by bodipy-sensitized cobaloxime catalysts. Inorg. Chem.53, 4527–4534. 10.1021/ic500218q
8
BiJ.FangW.LiL.WangJ.LiangS.HeY.et al. (2015). Covalent triazine-based frameworks as visible light photocatalysts for the splitting of water. Macromol. Rapid Commun.36, 1799–1805. 10.1002/marc.201500270
9
BlackF. A.ClarkC. A.SummersG. H.ClarkI. P.TowrieM.PenfoldT.et al. (2017). Investigating interfacial electron transfer in dye-sensitized NiO using vibrational spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.19, 7877–7885. 10.1039/C6CP05712H
10
BoensN.VerbelenB.DehaenW. (2015). Postfunctionalization of the BODIPY core : synthesis and spectroscopy. Eur. J. Org. Chem.2015, 6577–6595. 10.1002/ejoc.201500682
11
BoensN.VerbelenB.OrtizM. J.JiaoL.DehaenW. (2019). Synthesis of BODIPY dyes through postfunctionalization of the boron dipyrromethene core. Coord. Chem. Rev.399:213024. 10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213024
12
BucherL.AlyS. M.DesboisN.KarsentiP. L.GrosC. P.HarveyP. D. (2017). Random structural modification of a low-band-gap BODIPY-based polymer. J. Phys. Chem. C121, 6478–6490. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b00117
13
ChenK.DongY.ZhaoX.ImranM.TangG.ZhaoJ.et al. (2019). Bodipy derivatives as triplet photosensitizers and the related intersystem crossing mechanisms. Front. Chem.7:821. 10.3389/fchem.2019.00821
14
ChenL.HonshoY.SekiS.JiangD. (2010). Light-harvesting conjugated microporous polymers: Rapid and highly efficient flow of light energy with a porous polyphenylene framework as antenna. J. Am. Chem. Soc.132, 6742–6748. 10.1021/ja100327h
15
CreutzC. (1981). The complexities of ascorbate as a reducing agent. Inorg. Chem.20, 4449–4452. 10.1021/ic50226a088
16
DaiC.LiuB. (2020). Conjugated polymers for visible-light-driven photocatalysis. Energy Environ. Sci.13, 24–52. 10.1039/C9EE01935A
17
DalleK. E.WarnanJ.LeungJ. J.ReuillardB.KarmelI. S.ReisnerE. (2019). Electro- and solar-driven fuel synthesis with first row transition metal complexes. Chem. Rev.119, 2752–2875. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00392
18
DasN.BindraG. S.PaulA.VosJ. G.SchulzM.PryceM. T. (2017). Enhancing photocatalytic hydrogen generation: the impact of the peripheral ligands in Ru/Pd and Ru/Pt complexes. Chem. A Eur. J.23, 5330–5337. 10.1002/chem.201605980
19
DeRosaM. C.CrutchleyR. J. (2002). Photosensitized singlet oxygen and its applications. Coord. Chem. Rev.233–234, 351–371. 10.1016/S0010-8545(02)00034-6
20
DonuruV. R.VegesnaG. K.VelayudhamS.GreenS.LiuH. (2009a). Synthesis and optical properties of red and deep-red emissive polymeric and copolymeric BODIPY dyes. Chem. Mater.21, 2130–2138. 10.1021/cm900276r
21
DonuruV. R.VegesnaG. K.VelayudhamS.MengG.LiuH. (2009b). Deep-red emissive conjugated poly(2,6-BODIPY-ethynylene)s bearing alkyl side chains. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem.47, 5354–5366. 10.1002/pola.23585
22
DonuruV. R.ZhuS.GreenS.LiuH. (2010). Near-infrared emissive BODIPY polymeric and copolymeric dyes. Polymer51, 5359–5368. 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.09.029
23
DuraL.WächtlerM.KupferS.KübelJ.AhrensJ.HöflerS.et al. (2017). Photophysics of BODIPY dyes as readily-designable photosensitisers in light-driven proton reduction. Inorganics5:21. 10.3390/inorganics5020021
24
EconomopoulosS. P.ChochosC. L.IoannidouH. A.NeophytouM.CharilaouC.ZissimouG. A.et al. (2013). Novel BODIPY-based conjugated polymers donors for organic photovoltaic applications. RSC Adv.3, 10221–10229. 10.1039/c3ra40957k
25
FajrinaN.TahirM. (2019). A critical review in strategies to improve photocatalytic water splitting towards hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy44, 540–577. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.200
26
FilatovM. A. (2019). Heavy-atom-free BODIPY photosensitizers with intersystem crossing mediated by intramolecular photoinduced electron transfer. Org. Biomol. Chem.18, 10–27. 10.1039/C9OB02170A
27
GodoyJ.VivesG.TourJ. M. (2010). Synthesis of highly fluorescent BODIPY-based nanocars. Org. Lett.12, 1464–1467. 10.1021/ol100108r
28
GreethamG. M.BurgosP.QianC.ClarkI. P.CoddP. S.FarrowR. C.et al. (2010). ULTRA: a unique instrument for time-resolved spectroscopy. Appl. Spectrosc.64, 1311–1319. 10.1366/000370210793561673
29
GuiglionP.ButchosaC.ZwijnenburgM. A. (2016). Polymer photocatalysts for water splitting: insights from computational modeling. Macromol. Chem. Phys.217, 344–353. 10.1002/macp.201500432
30
GuzowK.KornowskaK.WiczkW. (2009). Synthesis and photophysical properties of a new amino acid possessing a BODIPY moiety. Tetrahedron Lett.50, 2908–2910. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.03.195
31
HoP. Y.MarkM. F.WangY.YiuS. C.YuW. H.HoC. L.et al. (2018). Panchromatic sensitization with ZnII porphyrin-based photosensitizers for light-driven hydrogen production. ChemSusChem11, 2517–2528. 10.1002/cssc.201801255
32
JayakumarJ.ChouH. H. (2020). Recent advances in visible-light-driven hydrogen evolution from water using polymer photocatalysts. ChemCatChem12, 689–704. 10.1002/cctc.201901725
33
JiangY.McNeillJ. (2017). Light-harvesting and amplified energy transfer in conjugated polymer nanoparticles. Chem. Rev.117, 838–859. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00419
34
KeeH. L.KirmaieryC.YuL.ThamyongkitP.YoungbloodW. J.CalderM. E.et al. (2005). Structural control of the photodynamics of boron-dipyrrin complexes. J. Phys. Chem. B109, 20433–20443. 10.1021/jp0525078
35
KhetubolA.Van SnickS.ClarkM. L.FronE.Coutiño-GonzálezE.CloetA.et al. (2015). Improved spectral coverage and fluorescence quenching in donor-acceptor systems involving indolo[3-2-b]carbazole and boron-dipyrromethene or diketopyrrolopyrrole. Photochem. Photobiol.91, 637–653. 10.1111/php.12437
36
KimT. G.CastroJ. C.LoudetA.JiaoJ. G. S.HochstrasserR. M.BurgessK.et al. (2006). Correlations of structure and rates of energy transfer for through-bond energy-transfer cassettes. J. Phys. Chem. A110, 20–27. 10.1021/jp053388z
37
KowacsT.O'ReillyL.PanQ.HuijserA.LangP.RauS.et al. (2016). Subtle changes to peripheral ligands enable high turnover numbers for photocatalytic hydrogen generation with supramolecular photocatalysts. Inorg. Chem.55, 2685–2690. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01752
38
KrumovaK.CosaG. (2010). Bodipy dyes with tunable redox potentials and functional groups for further tethering: Preparation, electrochemical, and spectroscopic characterization. J. Am. Chem. Soc.132, 17560–17569. 10.1021/ja1075663
39
LaiH.LiuX.ZengF.PengG.LiJ.YiZ. (2020). Multicarbazole-based D-π-A dyes sensitized hydrogen evolution under visible light irradiation. ACS Omega5, 2027–2033. 10.1021/acsomega.9b04135
40
LazaridesT.McCormickT.DuP.LuoG.LindleyB.EisenbergR. (2009). Making hydrogen from water using a homogeneous system without noble metals. J. Am. Chem. Soc.131, 9192–9194. 10.1021/ja903044n
41
LazaridesT.MccormickT. M.WilsonK. C.LeeS.MccamantD. W.EisenbergR. (2011). Sensitizing the sensitizer: the synthesis and photophysical study of bodipy-Pt (II)(diimine)(dithiolate) conjugates. J. Am. Chem. Soc.133, 350–364. 10.1021/ja1070366
42
LeeY.MalamakalR. M.ChenowethD. M.AnnaJ. M. (2020). Halogen bonding facilitates intersystem crossing in iodo-BODIPY chromophores. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.11, 877–884. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03753
43
LiL.FangW.ZhangP.BiJ.HeY.WangJ.et al. (2016). Sulfur-doped covalent triazine-based frameworks for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from water under visible light. J. Mater. Chem. A4, 12402–12406. 10.1039/C6TA04711D
44
LiY.YangL.DuM.ChangG. (2019). Rational design of a boron-dipyrromethene-based fluorescent probe for detecting Pd2+ sensitively and selectively in aqueous media. Analyst144, 1260–1264. 10.1039/C8AN01155A
45
LiuY.LiaoZ.MaX.XiangZ. (2018). Ultrastable and efficient visible-light-driven hydrogen production based on donor-acceptor copolymerized covalent organic polymer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces10, 30698–30705. 10.1021/acsami.8b10022
46
LoudetA.BurgessK. (2007). BODIPY dyes and their derivatives: syntheses and spectroscopic properties. Chem. Rev.107, 4891–4932. 10.1021/cr078381n
47
LuoG. G.FangK.WuJ. H.MoJ. (2015a). Photocatalytic water reduction from a noble-metal-free molecular dyad based on a thienyl-expanded BODIPY photosensitizer. Chem. Commun.51, 12361–12364. 10.1039/C5CC03897A
48
LuoG. G.LuH.ZhangX. L.DaiJ. C.WuJ. H.WuJ. J. (2015b). The relationship between the boron dipyrromethene (BODIPY) structure and the effectiveness of homogeneous and heterogeneous solar hydrogen-generating systems as well as DSSCs. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.17, 9716–9729. 10.1039/C5CP00732A
49
LuoG. G.PanZ. H.LinJ. Q.SunD. (2018). Tethered sensitizer-catalyst noble-metal-free molecular devices for solar-driven hydrogen generation. Dalt. Trans.47, 15633–15645. 10.1039/C8DT02831A
50
MantonJ. C.LongC.VosJ. G.PryceM. T. (2014). A photo- and electrochemical investigation of BODIPY-cobaloxime complexes for hydrogen production, coupled with quantum chemical calculations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.16, 5229–5236. 10.1039/c3cp55347g
51
McDonnellS. O.HallM. J.AllenL. T.ByrneA.GallagherW. M.O'SheaD. F. (2005). Supramolecular photonic therapeutic agents. J. Am. Chem. Soc.127, 16360–16361. 10.1021/ja0553497
52
MeierC. B.SprickR. S.MontiA.GuiglionP.LeeJ. S. M.ZwijnenburgM. A.et al. (2017). Structure-property relationships for covalent triazine-based frameworks: The effect of spacer length on photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from water. Polymer126, 283–290. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.04.017
53
MengG.VelayudhamS.SmithA.LuckR.LiuH. (2009). Color tuning of polyfluorene emission with BODIPY monomers. Macromolecules42, 1995–2001. 10.1021/ma8023975
54
MishraA.FischerM. K. R.BüuerleP. (2009). Metal-free organic dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells: from structure: property relationships to design rules. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.48, 2474–2499. 10.1002/anie.200804709
55
OngW. J.TanL. L.NgY. H.YongS. T.ChaiS. P. (2016). Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)-based photocatalysts for artificial photosynthesis and environmental remediation: are we a step closer to achieving sustainability?Chem. Rev.116, 7159–7329. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00075
56
O'ReillyL.PanQ.DasN.WenderichK.KorterikJ. P.VosJ. G.et al. (2018). Hydrogen-generating ru/pt bimetallic photocatalysts based on phenyl-phenanthroline peripheral ligands. ChemPhysChem19, 3084–3091. 10.1002/cphc.201800658
57
PachfuleP.AcharjyaA.RoeserJ.LangenhahnT.SchwarzeM.SchomäckerR.et al. (2018). Diacetylene functionalized covalent organic framework (COF) for photocatalytic hydrogen generation. J. Am. Chem. Soc.140, 1423–1427. 10.1021/jacs.7b11255
58
PellegrinY.OdobelF. (2017). Sacrifical electron donor reagents for solar fuel production. Comptes Rendus Chim.20, 283–295. 10.1016/j.crci.2015.11.026
59
PiatkowskiP.MorenoM.LirasM.SánchezF.DouhalA. (2019). Optical characterization of a two-dimensional BODIPY-based polymer material and its related chromophores. J. Mater. Chem. C7, 7872–7884. 10.1039/C9TC02137J
60
RanJ.GuoW.WangH.ZhuB.YuJ.QiaoS. Z. (2018). Metal-free 2D/2D phosphorene/g-C3N4 van der waals heterojunction for highly enhanced visible-light photocatalytic H2 production. Adv. Mater.30, 2–7. 10.1002/adma.201800128
61
RedmondR. W.GamlinJ. N. (1999). A compilation of singlet oxygen yields from biologically relevant molecules. Photochem. Photobiol.70, 391–475. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1999.tb08240.x
62
ReynalA.PastorE.GrossM. A.SelimS.ReisnerE.DurrantJ. R. (2015). Unravelling the pH-dependence of a molecular photocatalytic system for hydrogen production. Chem. Sci.6, 4855–4859. 10.1039/C5SC01349F
63
RommelS. A.SorscheD.SchönweizS.KübelJ.RockstrohN.DietzekB.et al. (2016). Visible-light sensitized photocatalytic hydrogen generation using a dual emissive heterodinuclear cyclometalated iridium(III)/ruthenium(II) complex. J. Organomet. Chem.821, 163–170. 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2016.04.002
64
SabatiniR. P.LindleyB.McCormickT. M.LazaridesT.BrennesselW. W.McCamantD. W.et al. (2016). Efficient bimolecular mechanism of photochemical hydrogen production using halogenated boron-dipyrromethene (Bodipy) dyes and a bis(dimethylglyoxime) cobalt(III) complex. J. Phys. Chem. B120, 527–534. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b11035
65
SabatiniR. P.McCormickT. M.LazaridesT.WilsonK. C.EisenbergR.McCamantD. W. (2011). Intersystem crossing in halogenated Bodipy chromophores used for solar hydrogen production. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.2, 223–227. 10.1021/jz101697y
66
SchoderS.Kord Daoroun KalaiS.ReissigH. U. (2017). Novel alkoxy-substituted dipyrrins and near-ir bodipy dyes—preparation and photophysical properties. Chem. A Eur. J.23, 12527–12533. 10.1002/chem.201701108
67
Singh BindraG.SchulzM.PaulA.GroarkeR.SomanS.InglisJ. L.et al. (2012). The role of bridging ligand in hydrogen generation by photocatalytic Ru/Pd assemblies. Dalt. Trans.41:13050. 10.1039/c2dt30948c
68
SprickR. S.BonilloB.ClowesR.GuiglionP.BrownbillN. J.SlaterB. J.et al. (2016). Visible-light-driven hydrogen evolution using planarized conjugated polymer photocatalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.55, 1792–1796. 10.1002/anie.201510542
69
SprickR. S.JiangJ. X.BonilloB.RenS.RatvijitvechT.GuiglionP.et al. (2015). Tunable organic photocatalysts for visible-light-driven hydrogen evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc.137, 3265–3270. 10.1021/ja511552k
70
SqueoB. M.GregoriouV. G.AvgeropoulosA.BaysecS.AllardS.ScherfU.et al. (2017). BODIPY-based polymeric dyes as emerging horizon materials for biological sensing and organic electronic applications. Prog. Polym. Sci.71, 26–52. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.02.003
71
StegbauerL.SchwinghammerK.LotschB. V. (2014). A hydrazone-based covalent organic framework for photocatalytic hydrogen production. Chem. Sci.5, 2789–2793. 10.1039/C4SC00016A
72
SuhinaT.AmirjalayerS.WoutersenS.BonnD.BrouwerA. M. (2017). Ultrafast dynamics and solvent-dependent deactivation kinetics of BODIPY molecular rotors. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.19, 19998–20007. 10.1039/C7CP02037F
73
SummersG. H.LefebvreJ. F.BlackF. A.Stephen DaviesE.GibsonE. A.PulleritsT.et al. (2015). Design and characterisation of bodipy sensitizers for dye-sensitized NiO solar cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.18, 1059–1070. 10.1039/C5CP05177K
74
SuryaniO.HigashinoY.SatoH.KuboY. (2019). Visible-to-near-infrared light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen production using dibenzo-BODIPY and phenothiazine conjugate as organic photosensitizer. ACS Appl. Energy Mater.2, 448–458. 10.1021/acsaem.8b01474
75
TongL.ZongR.ThummelR. P. (2014). Visible light-driven hydrogen evolution from water catalyzed by a molecular cobalt complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc.136, 4881–4884. 10.1021/ja501257d
76
UlrichG.ZiesselR.HarrimanA. (2008). The chemistry of fluorescent bodipy dyes: versatility unsurpassed. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.47, 1184–1201. 10.1002/anie.200702070
77
WanC. W.BurghartA.ChenJ.BergströmF.JohanssonL. B.WolfordM. F.et al. (2003). Anthracene–BODIPY cassettes: syntheses and energy transfer. Chem. A Eur. J.9, 4430–4441. 10.1002/chem.200304754
78
WangL.ZhangY.ChenL.XuH.XiongY. (2018). 2D Polymers as emerging materials for photocatalytic overall water splitting. Adv. Mater.30, 1–12. 10.1002/adma.201870369
79
WangQ.HisatomiT.KatayamaM.TakataT.MinegishiT.KudoA.et al. (2017). Particulate photocatalyst sheets for Z-scheme water splitting: advantages over powder suspension and photoelectrochemical systems and future challenges. Faraday Discuss.197, 491–504. 10.1039/C6FD00184J
80
WangS.ZhaoH.ZhaoX.ZhangJ.AoZ.DongP.et al. (2020). Surface engineering of hollow carbon nitride microspheres for efficient photoredox catalysis. Chem. Eng. J.381:122593. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122593
81
WangY.VogelA.SachsM.SprickR. S.WilbrahamL.MonizS. J. A.et al. (2019). Current understanding and challenges of solar-driven hydrogen generation using polymeric photocatalysts. Nat. Energy4, 746–760. 10.1038/s41560-019-0456-5
82
WanwongS.SurawatanawongP.KhumsubdeeS.KanchanakungwankulS.WootthikanokkhanJ. (2016). Synthesis, optical, and electrochemical properties, and theoretical calculations of BODIPY containing triphenylamine. Heteroat. Chem.27, 306–315. 10.1002/hc.21341
83
WillkommJ.ReisnerE. (2018). Photo- and electrocatalytic H2 evolution with cobalt oxime complexes. Bull. Jpn Soc. Coord. Chem.71, 18–29. 10.4019/bjscc.71.18
84
WoodsD. J.HillmanS.PearceD.WilbrahamL.FlaggL.DuffyW.et al. (2020). Side-chain tuning in conjugated polymer photocatalysts for improved hydrogen production from water. Energy Environ. Sci.13, 1843–1855. 10.1039/D0EE01213K
85
WoodsD. J.SprickR. S.SmithC. L.CowanA. J.CooperA. I. (2017). A solution-processable polymer photocatalyst for hydrogen evolution from water. Adv. Energy Mater.7, 1–6. 10.1002/aenm.201700479
86
WuW.GuoH.WuW.JiS.ZhaoJ. (2011). Organic triplet sensitizer library derived from a single chromophore (BODIPY) with long-lived triplet excited state for triplet-triplet annihilation based upconversion. J. Org. Chem.76, 7056–7064. 10.1021/jo200990y
87
XieA.PanZ. H.YuM.LuoG. G.SunD. (2019). Photocatalytic hydrogen production from acidic aqueous solution in BODIPY-cobaloxime-ascorbic acid homogeneous system. Chinese Chem. Lett.30, 225–228. 10.1016/j.cclet.2018.05.003
88
XuC.ZhangW.TangJ.PanC.YuG. (2018). Porous organic polymers: an emerged platform for photocatalytic water splitting. Front. Chem.6:592. 10.3389/fchem.2018.00592
89
YangC.MaB. C.ZhangL.LinS.GhasimiS.LandfesterK.et al. (2016). Molecular engineering of conjugated polybenzothiadiazoles for enhanced hydrogen production by photosynthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.55, 9202–9206. 10.1002/anie.201603532
90
YiJ.El-AlamiW.SongY.LiH.AjayanP. M.XuH. (2020). Emerging surface strategies on graphitic carbon nitride for solar driven water splitting. Chem. Eng. J.382:122812. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122812
91
YongW. W.LuH.LiH.WangS.ZhangM. T. (2018). Photocatalytic hydrogen production with conjugated polymers as photosensitizers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces10, 10828–10834. 10.1021/acsami.7b18917
92
ZannottiM.BenazziE.StevensL. A.MinicucciM.BruceL.SnapeC. E.et al. (2019). Reduced graphene oxide-NiO photocathodes for p-type dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Appl. Energy Mater.2, 7345–7353. 10.1021/acsaem.9b01323
93
ZhangG.LanZ.-A.WangX. (2016). Conjugated polymers: catalysts for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.55, 15712–15727. 10.1002/anie.201607375
94
ZhangT.MaX.TianH. (2020). A facile way to obtain near-infrared room-temperature phosphorescent soft materials based on bodipy dyes. Chem. Sci.11, 482–487. 10.1039/C9SC05502A
95
ZhangX. F.ZhuJ. (2019). BODIPY parent compound: fluorescence, singlet oxygen formation and properties revealed by DFT calculations. J. Lumin.205, 148–157. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2018.09.017
96
ZhaoJ.XuK.YangW.WangZ.ZhongF. (2015). The triplet excited state of bodipy: formation, modulation and application. Chem. Soc. Rev.44, 8904–8939. 10.1039/C5CS00364D
97
ZhengB.SabatiniR. P.FuW.-F.EumM.-S.BrennesselW. W.WangL.et al. (2015). Light-driven generation of hydrogen: new chromophore dyads for increased activity based on Bodipy dye and Pt(diimine)(dithiolate) complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.112, E3987–E3996. 10.1073/pnas.1509310112
98
ZhuM.JiangL.YuanM.LiuX.OuyangC.ZhengH.et al. (2008). Efficient tuning nonlinear optical properties: synthesis and characterization of a series of novel poly(aryleneethynylene)s co-containing BODIPY. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem.46, 7401–7410. 10.1002/pola.23045
99
ZhuY.JiY. J.WangD. G.ZhangY.TangH.JiaX. R.et al. (2017). BODIPY-based conjugated porous polymers for highly efficient volatile iodine capture. J. Mater. Chem. A5, 6622–6629. 10.1039/C7TA00026J
100
ZiesselR.GozeC.UlrichG.CésarioM.RetailleauP.HarrimanA.et al. (2005). Intramolecular energy transfer in pyrene-bodipy molecular dyads and triads. Chem. A Eur. J.11, 7366–7378. 10.1002/chem.200500373
Summary
Keywords
BODIPY polymer, photocatalytic, time-resolved spectroscopy, hydrogen, TAS, TRIR
Citation
Cullen AA, Heintz K, O'Reilly L, Long C, Heise A, Murphy R, Karlsson J, Gibson E, Greetham GM, Towrie M and Pryce MT (2020) A Time-Resolved Spectroscopic Investigation of a Novel BODIPY Copolymer and Its Potential Use as a Photosensitiser for Hydrogen Evolution. Front. Chem. 8:584060. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.584060
Received
22 July 2020
Accepted
15 September 2020
Published
19 October 2020
Volume
8 - 2020
Edited by
Svetlana Ivanova, University of Seville, Spain
Reviewed by
Shaomin Ji, Guangdong University of Technology, China; Xin Li, Zhejiang University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Cullen, Heintz, O'Reilly, Long, Heise, Murphy, Karlsson, Gibson, Greetham, Towrie and Pryce.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mary T. Pryce mary.pryce@dcu.ie
This article was submitted to Supramolecular Chemistry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemistry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.