ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Chem., 08 February 2024

Sec. Chemical Physics and Physical Chemistry

Volume 12 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2024.1369937

Kinetics of extracting valuable components from Ti-bearing blast furnace slag by acidolysis with sulphuric acid

  • 1. College of Environment and Resources, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, Sichuan, China

  • 2. Central Station of Ecological Environmental Monitoring in Mianyang, Mianyang, Sichuan, China

  • 3. College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Mianyang Teachers’ College, Mianyang, Sichuan, China

Abstract

Ti-bearing blast furnace slag is a kind of solid waste produced by Pangang Group Company through the blast furnace smelting method. A variety of valuable components can be extracted from the Ti-bearing blast furnace slag after acidolysis with concentrated sulphuric acid. In order to study the kinetics of acidolysis, this paper investigated the effects of the acidolysis temperature, acid-slag ratio and raw material particle size on the overall extraction rate of Ti4+, Mg2+ and Al3+ components at different reaction times, and simulated the acidolysis process by using the unreacted shrinking core model. The results showed that the acidolysis process was controlled by internal diffusion with an apparent activation energy of 19.05 kJ mol–1 and the semi-empirical kinetic equation of the acidolysis process was obtained.

1 Introduction

Vanadium-titanium magnetite in the West Panzhi region produces an industrial solid waste, Ti-bearing blast furnace slag (TBFS), in the process of ironmaking, and the mass fraction of TiO2 in the TBFS ranges from 18% to 22% (). Currently, the main disposal method for TBFS is to place it in a slag disposal pit, which has the disadvantages of requiring a large area, as well as the potential threat of environmental pollution and to human and animal health (). Therefore, it is essential to explore effective treatment methods for TBFS.

Due to the high titanium content in TBFS, it is difficult to use it directly for construction materials in the resource utilisation process (; ). Therefore, researchers in China have focus on extracting valuable components from TBFS, which is considered to be more significant for research and economic value. As early as the “seventh Five Year Plan” and “eighth Five Year Plan” periods, Panzhihua Iron and Steel Research Institute conducted research on the extraction of titanium from TBFS. Currently, a production line for titanium extraction by chlorination with an annual treatment of 180,000 tons of TBFS has been established (). However, another industrial solid waste, titanium extraction tailings, is generated in the chlorination process (). In addition, researchers have investigated the extraction of Ti, Si, Mg, Al and other elements from TBFS using alkalis, salts, acids, and other additives to prepare corresponding chemical products (; ). Among the various extraction processes, sulphuric acidolysis has rapidly become a research hotspot because of its mature process technology, stable and easy-to-control reaction, simple operation and the ability to extract a variety of valuable components simultaneously. In the process of using sulfuric acid to hydrolyze TBFS, whether dilute or concentrated sulfuric acid as a reaction agent, or use one stage leaching (), or two stage leaching (), or roasting (), or hydrothermal as reaction method, the extraction rate for titanium is high using this method (; ; ). The acidolysis of TBFS using sulfuric acid can convert solid phase Ti, Mg, and Al into soluble Ti4+, Mg2+ and Al3+, which are then sequentially separated by boiling hydrolysis and stepwise precipitation (). Therefore, optimizing the acidolysis conditions, improving the extraction rate, and efficiently extracting the valuable components in TBFS are of great significance to achieve the dual purposes of waste treatment and resource utilisation.

At present, domestic and international studies on sulfuric acid hydrolysis of TBFS mainly focus on reaction processes and mechanisms (), while there are fewer studies on the kinetic process of sulfuric acid hydrolysis. The following problems have arisen in actual process research: the acidolysis rate of each component in TBFS did not reach the equilibrium point of acidolysis kinetics, resulting in a high content of metal components in the remaining mud after acidolysis (). At the same time, the amount of mud increases and the component recovery decreases. This type of problem occurs not only in sulfuric acid hydrolysis of TBFS, but also in many sulfuric acid hydrometallurgy processes. Kinetic analysis can provide insight into the characteristics and mechanisms of sulphuric acid acidolysis of TBFS and predict the reaction rate, so as to effectively regulate the reaction conditions and improve the process efficiency. In order to provide a theoretical basis for the sulfuric acid acidolysis of TBFS, this study investigated the relationship between the total extraction rate of each component (i.e., all of Ti, Mg and Al) and the acidolysis time at different acidolysis temperatures, acid-slag ratios and raw material particle sizes. A kinetic model of the acidolysis process was fitted and the activation energy was calculated.

2 Experiment setup

2.1 Mineralogical analysis of TBFS

The TBFS samples were dried at 106°C for 24 h and some TBFS samples were ground to a particle size of less than 0.074 mm for XRD and XRF testing. The XRD results in Figure 1 show that the main mineral phase is perovskite with some amorphous phase (; ). Table 1 shows the XRF analysis results of TBFS. The main chemical components are CaO, SiO2, TiO2, Al2O3 and MgO, with low contents of SO3, Fe2O3, K2O, MnO and Na2O, and the lowest contents of F, BaO, SrO and ZrO2.

FIGURE 1

TABLE 1

Compoundwt%Compoundwt%
CaO28.08K2O0.72
SiO226.74MnO0.64
TiO219.65Na2O0.53
Al2O313.86F0.17
MgO7.64BaO0.07
SO31.05SrO0.04
Fe2O30.79ZrO20.02

Chemical composition of TBFS.

Figure 2 shows the SEM and EDS results of TBFS. From Figure 2A, it can be seen that the morphology of TBFS particles is an irregular structure with edges, smooth and dense surface, and uneven particle size. The EDS analysis was conducted on Ti, Mg, and Al elements in the A1 region. The distribution of each element is shown in Figures 2B–D. Ti, Mg, and Al elements are present on all visible particles and the enrichment zone boundary is not obvious, so the correlation between the three elements is well.

FIGURE 2

Figure 3 shows the occurrence state of Ti, Mg and Al in TBFS determined by Tessier method. The percentage of Ti chemical form is residue state (58.5%) > oxidation state (35.5%) > organic state (4.8%) > exchangeable state (1.2%) > Ti carbonate state (0.0%). The percentage of Mg chemical form is residue state (91.3%) > oxidation state (4.9%) > organic state (1.5%) = carbonate state (1.5%) > exchangeable state (0.8%); The percentage of Al chemical form is residue state (96.2%) > carbonate state (1.8%) > organic state (1.4%) > exchangeable state (0.6%) > oxidation state (0.1%). The main occurrence of three components are residue state, indicating that their Chemical existence form is relatively stable.

FIGURE 3

2.2 Experimental procedure

  • a. Grind TBFS to the specific particle size shown in Table 2. Weigh the ground sample (10 g) in a 100 mL ceramic crucible with a lid and add concentrated sulfuric acid at the specific acid-slag mass ratio shown in Table 2.

  • b. After the acid and TBFS have been thoroughly mixed, the crucible is placed in a tubular program high-temperature furnace and the acidolysis reaction is carried out for a certain time at the specific temperature shown in Table 2. At the end of the reaction, the acidolysed slag was finely ground and 10 g of the slag is placed in a 150 mL conical flask, mixed with 60 mL of deionised water and placed in a water bath at 60°C with magnetic stirring at 20 rpm for 60 min.

  • c. After the water leaching, the leached slurry is vacuum filtered at 0.09 MPa to separate the liquid from the solid and separated into leach residue and leachate. The content of Ti, Mg and Al in the leachate is determined by chemical titration and the percentages of components extracted (R) were calculated according to Eq. 1 (; ):

TABLE 2

Acidolysis temperature (°C)Acid-slag ratioTBFS particle size (μm)Acidolysis time (min)
100, 110, 120, 1301.4Unclassified5, 10, 15, 20, 40, 60
1301.0, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6Unclassified5, 10, 15, 20, 40, 60
1301.4300, 200, 150, 745, 10, 15, 20, 40, 60

Design of kinetic experimental protocol.

Here, m1 and m2 are the total masses of Ti, Al, and Mg components in the TBFS and leachate, respectively.

3 Results and discussion

It can be seen from Figure 1 that the main phase of TBFS is an amorphous structure, and the analysis in Figure 2 shows the high correlation between occurrence of Ti, Mg, and Al. Therefore, Ti, Mg, and Al are considered as a whole to calculate the total extraction rate of the components in the dynamic simulation (; ). The correlation calculation is carried out by investigating the relationship between the total extraction rate and the acidolysis time at different reaction temperatures, acid-slag ratio, and raw material particle sizes. The acidolysis reaction of concentrated sulphuric acid with TBFS is a typical liquid-solid reaction. Since the surface of the TBFS particles is relatively dense, it can be considered a non-porous structure. The particles containing Ti, Mg and Al gradually shrank during the reaction, so the most suitable model for the reaction kinetic is the unreacted shrinking core model (; ; ). The reaction started at the contact surface of concentrated H2SO4 and TBFS particles. The generated products (e.g., titanium sulphate) are wrapped around the surface of unreacted particles, and the H2SO4 diffused through the product layer to reach the unreacted interface to continue the acidolysis reaction. Thus, the overall rate of the reaction is affected by two steps: the internal diffusion step and the chemical reaction step (; ), the slower of which is the rate-controlling step during the acidolysis reaction process. Table 3 shows the relationship between the extraction rate r and time t for the two control steps of the unreacted shrinking core model.

TABLE 3

Rate controlling stepRate equation
Internal diffusion1+2(1 – r) – 3(1 – r)2/3 = krt
Chemical reaction1 – (1 – r)1/3 = krt

Integrated rate equation for unreacted shrinking core model.

r: total extraction rate of Ti, Al or Mg; t: acidolysis time (min); kr: apparent rate constant.

Figure 4 shows the relationship between time and extraction rate at different acidolysis temperatures, acid-slag ratios and TBFS particle sizes. When the extraction rate tends to be stable, the acidolysis reaction is basically end, so only extraction rate before the end of acidolysis reaction can be used for calculation in the fitting calculation of the kinetic model. Therefore, the data before the reaction stabilizes in Figure 4 are fitted by substituting the equation in Table 3 and the fitting results are shown in Figures 5, 6. The kinetic fitting model is considered to be well fitted when the correlation coefficient (R2) is greater than 0.85 (; ), which shows that the R2 between the internal diffusion Equation (1) + 2(1 – r) – 3(1 – r)2/3 and time t is greater than 0.85 for different acid-slag ratios, acidolysis temperatures and TBFS particle sizes. It can be assumed that the acidolysis reaction rate is mainly controlled by the internal diffusion of H2SO4 in the product layer (). The related fitting equation and reaction rate constant kr are shown in Table 4.

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 6

TABLE 4

Apparent rate constant krFitting equation (t)
Acidolysis temperature (°C)
1000.017491 + 2(1 – r) – 3(1 – r)2/3 = 0.00661
1100.020641 + 2(1 – r) – 3(1 – r)2/3 = 0.00914
1200.025681 + 2(1 – r) – 3(1 – r)2/3 = 0.02568
1300.026971 + 2(1 – r) – 3(1 – r)2/3 = 0.02985
Acid-slag ratio (g·g–1)
1.00.006111 + 2(1 – r) – 3(1 – r)2/3 = 0.00611
1.20.008221 + 2(1 – r) – 3(1 – r)2/3 = 0.00822
1.40.026971 + 2(1 – r) – 3(1 – r)2/3 = 0.02697
1.60.030671 + 2(1 – r) – 3(1 – r)2/3 = 0.03067
TBFS particle size (μm)
3000.008541 + 2(1 – r) – 3(1 – r)2/3 = 0.00854
2000.009161 + 2(1 – r) – 3(1 – r)2/3 = 0.00916
1500.011631 + 2(1 – r) – 3(1 – r)2/3 = 0.02098
740.014611 + 2(1 – r) – 3(1 – r)2/3 = 0.01461

Fitting parameters of internal diffusion kinetic equations under different acidolysis conditions.

The apparent rate constant kr is influenced by the acidolysis temperature, the concentration of acidolysis solution in the reaction system and the feedstock radius, as shown in empirical Eq. 2 (). Combined with the acidolysis conditions in this paper, this is translated into Eq. 3 to include the acid-slag ratio and TBFS particle size (; ).

Here, kr is the apparent rate constant, x is the acid-slag ratio, k is the temperature-dependent reaction rate constant, C2 is the concentration of concentrated sulphuric acid in the reaction system (the ratio of the molar concentration of sulphuric acid), M1 is the molar mass of TBFS,ρ2 is the density of the concentrated sulphuric acid, r1 is the radius of TBFS particles (mm); M2 is the molar mass of the concentrated sulphuric acid andρ1 is the density of TBFS.

The relationship between kr and the acidolysis temperature follows the Arrhenius Eq. 4. The logarithm of both sides of the equation is taken to obtain Eq. 5 (; ).

Here, kr is the apparent rate constant, A is the frequency factor, Ea is the apparent activation energy (J·mol–1), R is the molar gas constant (8.314 J mol–1) and T is the acidolysis temperature.

According to the data inTable 4, the relationship between lnkr and 1/T is plotted. As shown in Figure 6A, the apparent activation energy of the acidolysis reaction is estimated to be 19.05 kJ mol–1 based on the slope of the straight line in Eqss 4, and A was estimated as 8.23 based on the intercept. It is generally accepted that higher activation energies (>40 kJ mol–1) indicate chemical control, while activation energies of <20 kJ mol–1 indicate diffusion-controlled processes (; ). Thus, these results further indicated that the acidolysis process is consistent with internal diffusion control. The relationship between k r and the acidolysis temperature T could be expressed as Eq. 6.

When is replaced by constant A1, Eq. 3 is transformed into an equation relating kr to the acid-slag ratio x by taking the reciprocal and then the logarithm of both sides, as shown in Eq. 7.

The relationship between lnkr and is shown in Figure 6B. The slope of the fitted line is 9.80201, so the relationship between kr and x can be expressed as Eq. 8.

When is replaced by the constant A2, Eq. 3 can be converted into Eq. 9.

Figure 7C shows the relationship between lnkr and lnr1. The slope of the fitted line is −0.40437, so the relationship between kr and r1 can be expressed as Eq. 10.

FIGURE 7

Combining Eqs 6, 8, 10, the semi-empirical kinetic equations related to the acid-slag ratio, acidolysis temperature, TBFS particle radius and kr are established as follows.

Here, A3 is the frequency factor and .

Since , so . Substituting ρ1 = 1.429, ρ2 = 1.84 and the process parameters with the best fit to the internal diffusion control equation; that is, x = 1.6 and r1 = 75 × 10−6 m, it is calculated that = 77.29 × 10−2. Therefore, the kinetic equation could be shown as Eq. 11.

Here, x is the acid-slag ratio, d1 is the TBFS particle size (m), R is the molar gas constant (R = 8.314 J mol–1) and T is the acidolysis temperature (K).

The data in Figure 4 are substituted into the left-hand side of Eq. 11 and the corresponding values of the relevant process parameters are substituted into the right-hand side of Eq. 11 for comparative analysis. Figure 8 shows the results of the comparison between experimental and fitted values, which are in good correlation with each other. This indicates that the derived kinetic equations are valuable in reflecting the actual situation.

FIGURE 8

Under the conditions of average particle size of 150 μm, acid/solid ratio of 1.4, acidolysis temperature of 300°C, and acidolysisi time of 40 min, the extraction rates of Ti, Mg, and Al reached 82.85%, 93.16%, and 96.96%, respectively. The chemical analysis and XRD of the leached residue are shown in Table 5 and Figure 9. After acidolysis with sulfuric acid and leaching with deionized water, the main elements in residual are S, Si, and Ca, with Ca mainly present in the form of gypsum.

TABLE 5

Compoundwt%Compoundwt%
SO336.84K2O0.12
SiO231.09MnO0.09
CaO24.38Na2O0.07
TiO25.26BaO0.05
Al2O31.24SrO0.03
MgO0.58ZrO20.01
Fe2O30.25

Chemical composition of the leaching resides with titanium leaching rate at 82.5%.

FIGURE 9

4 Conclusion

  • a. The chemical composition of TBFS is complex, with the main chemical componets are CaO, SiO2, TiO2, Al2O3, and MgO. There is a certain correlation and close connection between different elements in TBFS, and the main mineral phase of TBFS is perovskite, and there are also some amorphous structures.

  • b. The acidolysis temperature, acid-slag ratio and TBFS particle size are positively correlated with the extraction rate of TBFS, with the higher the value of these three variables, the higher the extraction rate.

  • c. The acidolysis process is consistent with the ‘unreacted shrinking core model’ and the reaction rate is controlled by internal diffusion through the solid product layer.

  • d. The apparent activation energy of the acidolysis reaction is calculated by the Arrhenius equation as 19.05 kJ mol–1 and the kinetic equation is:

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

YW: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. SH: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing–review and editing. XG: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Software, Writing–review and editing. JG: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing–review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Financial support for this research was provided by the Sichuan Science Provinces Science and Technology Support Program (2022NSFSC1072) and the Research Foundation of Mianyang Normal University (QD 2021A06). National Natural Science Foundation of China (42272042).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1

    AlkanM.DoğanM. (2004). Dissolution kinetics of colemanite in oxalic acid solutions. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif.43 (7), 867872. 10.1016/s0255-2701(03)00108-9

  • 2

    HabashiF. (1980). Principles of extractive metallurgy. General Principles, 1. New York: Gordon and Breach.

  • 3

    HeS.PengT.SunH. (2019). Titanium recovery from Ti-bearing blast furnace slag by alkali calcination and acidolysis. Jom71 (9), 31963201. 10.1007/s11837-019-03575-9

  • 4

    HeS.WangY. (2023). Extraction of valuable components from Ti-bearing blast furnace slag using sulfuric acid calcination process. JOM75 (2), 392399. 10.1007/s11837-022-05557-w

  • 5

    HongjuanS.GuobiaoZ.TongjiangP.XiaoW.SiqiH.FanZ. (2015). Recovery of titanium from titanium-rich product prepared from high ti-bearing blast furnace slag by sulfuric acid leaching. Min. metallurgy24 (3), 5458.

  • 6

    HuangS.ZhangR. (1994). Pilot test of carbonization of the molten blast furnace TiO2 slag at PanZhiHua iron and steel company. Iron Steel Vanadium Titan.15 (2), 1721.

  • 7

    HuangX.WangZ.LiuY.HuW.NiW. (2016). On the use of blast furnace slag and steel slag in the preparation of green artificial reef concrete. Constr. Build. Mater.112, 241246. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.088

  • 8

    JiangT.DongH.GuoY.LiG.YangY. (2010). Study on leaching Ti from Ti bearing blast furnace slag by sulphuric acid. Mineral Process. Extr. Metallurgy119 (1), 3338. 10.1179/037195509x12585446038807

  • 9

    JuJ.FengY.LiH.WuR.WangB. (2022). An approach towards utilization of water-quenched blast furnace slag for recovery of titanium, magnesium, and aluminum. J. Environ. Chem. Eng.10 (4), 108153. 10.1016/j.jece.2022.108153

  • 10

    KuwaharaY.OhmichiT.KamegawaT.MoriK.YamashitaH. (2010). A novel conversion process for waste slag: synthesis of a hydrotalcite-like compound and zeolite from blast furnace slag and evaluation of adsorption capacities. J. Mater. Chem.20 (24), 50525062. 10.1039/c0jm00518e

  • 11

    LiW. X.LiuM. S.ChengS. B.ZhangH. F.YangW. X.YiZ.et al (2024a). Polarization independent tunable bandwidth absorber based on single-layer graphene. Diam. Relat. Mater.142, 110793. 10.1016/j.diamond.2024.110793

  • 12

    LiW. X.MaJ.ZhangH. F.ChengS. B.YangW. X.YiZ.et al (2023c). Tunable broadband absorber based on a layered resonant structure with a Dirac semimetal. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.25, 84898496. 10.1039/d2cp05562g

  • 13

    LiW. X.XuF.ChengS. B.YangW. X.LiuB.LiuM. S.et al (2024b). Six-band rotationally symmetric tunable absorption film based on AlCuFe quasicrystals. Opt. Laser Technol.169, 110186. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.110186

  • 14

    LiW. X.YiY. T.YangH.ChengS. B.YangW. X.ZhangH. F.et al (2023b). Active tunable terahertz bandwidth absorber based on single layer graphene. Commun. Theor. Phys.75, 045503. 10.1088/1572-9494/acbe2d

  • 15

    LiW. X.ZhaoW. C.ChengS. B.YangW. X.YiZ.LiG. F.et al (2023a). Terahertz selective active electromagnetic absorption film based on single-layer graphene. Surfaces Interfaces40, 103042. 10.1016/j.surfin.2023.103042

  • 16

    LiangS. R.XuF.LiW. X.YangW. X.ChengS. B.YangH.et al (2023a). Tunable smart mid infrared thermal control emitter based on phase change material VO2 thin film. Appl. Therm. Eng.232, 121074. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121074

  • 17

    LiangS. R.XuF.YangH.ChengS. B.YangW. X.YiZ.et al (2023b). Ultra long infrared metamaterial absorber with high absorption and broad band based on nano cross surrounding. Opt. Laser Technol.158, 108789. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108789

  • 18

    MaJ.WuP. H.LiW. X.LiangS. R.ShangguanQ. Y.ChengS. B.et al (2023). A five-peaks graphene absorber with multiple adjustable and high sensitivity in the far infrared band. Diam. Relat. Mater.136, 109960. 10.1016/j.diamond.2023.109960

  • 19

    NieW.WenS.FengQ.LiuD.ZhouY. (2020). Mechanism and kinetics study of sulfuric acid leaching of titanium from titanium-bearing electric furnace slag. J. Mater. Res. Technol.9 (2), 17501758. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.12.006

  • 20

    NieW.WenS.LiuD.HuT.ZhangL. (2023a). Innovative application of two-stage sulfuric acid leaching for efficient recovery of Ti from titanium-bearing electric furnace slag. J. Environ. Chem. Eng.11 (1), 109174. 10.1016/j.jece.2022.109174

  • 21

    NieW.WenS.LiuD.HuT.ZhangL. (2023b). Innovative application of two-stage sulfuric acid leaching for efficient recovery of Ti from titanium-bearing electric furnace slag. J. Environ. Chem. Eng.11 (1), 109174. 10.1016/j.jece.2022.109174

  • 22

    PengY.AoJ.XiaQ. (2005). The causes and countermeasures for non-hydrated activity of residual slags from chlorination process of PanGang BF slags. Multipurp. Util. Mineral Resour.6, 4046.

  • 23

    SantosF. M.PinaP. S.PorcaroR.OliveiraV. A.SilvaC. A.LeãoV. A. (2010). The kinetics of zinc silicate leaching in sodium hydroxide. Hydrometallurgy102 (1-4), 4349. 10.1016/j.hydromet.2010.01.010

  • 24

    ShangguanQ. Y.ChenH.YangH.LiangS. R.ZhangY. J.ChengS. B.et al (2022b). A “belfry-typed” narrow-band tunable perfect absorber based on graphene and the application potential research. Diam. Relat. Mater.125, 108973. 10.1016/j.diamond.2022.108973

  • 25

    ShangguanQ. Y.ZhaoY.SongZ. J.WangJ.YangH.ChenJ.et al (2022a). High sensitivity active adjustable graphene absorber for refractive index sensing applications. Diam. Relat. Mater.128, 109273. 10.1016/j.diamond.2022.109273

  • 26

    SohnH. Y.WadsworthM. E. (2013). Rate processes of extractive metallurgy. Germany: Springer Science and Business Media.

  • 27

    ValighazviniF.RashchiF.NekoueiR. K. (2013). Recovery of titanium from blast furnace slag. Industrial Eng. Chem. Res.52 (4), 17231730. 10.1021/ie301837m

  • 28

    WangD. Y.YiZ.MaG. L.DaiB.YangJ. B.ZhangJ. F.et al (2022c). Two-channel photonic crystal fiber based on surface plasmon resonance for magnetic field and temperature dual-parameter sensing. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.24, 2123321241. 10.1039/d2cp02778j

  • 29

    WangD. Y.ZhuW. L.YiZ.MaG. L.GaoX.DaiB.et al (2022b). Highly sensitive sensing of a magnetic field and temperature based on two open ring channels SPR-PCF. Opt. Express30, 39055. 10.1364/oe.470386

  • 30

    WangL.ChenL.LiuW.ZhangG.TangS.YueH.et al (2022a). Recovery of titanium, aluminum, magnesium and separating silicon from titanium-bearing blast furnace slag by sulfuric acid curing—leaching. Int. J. Minerals, Metallurgy Mater.29 (9), 17051714. 10.1007/s12613-021-2293-3

  • 31

    WangM. Z.ChenJ.JingB. Y.ZhangL. Y.DongY. Y.YuX. Z. (2020). Analysis of reaction kinetics of edible oil oxidation at ambient temperature by FTIR spectroscopy. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol.122, 1900302. 10.1002/ejlt.201900302

  • 32

    WangW.ZengD.ChenQ.YinX. (2013). Experimental determination and modeling of gypsum and insoluble anhydrite solubility in the system CaSO4–H2SO4–H2O. Chem. Eng. Sci.101, 120129. 10.1016/j.ces.2013.06.023

  • 33

    ZhangC.YiY. T.YangH.YiZ.ChenX. F.ZhouZ. G.et al (2022). Wide spectrum solar energy absorption based on germanium plated ZnO nanorod arrays: energy band regulation, Finite element simulation, Super hydrophilicity, Photothermal conversion. Appl. Mater. Today28, 101531. 10.1016/j.apmt.2022.101531

  • 34

    ZhangL.ZhangL.WangM.LiG.SuiZ. (2007). Recovery of titanium compounds from molten Ti-bearing blast furnace slag under the dynamic oxidation condition. Miner. Eng.20 (7), 684693. 10.1016/j.mineng.2007.01.003

  • 35

    ZhangS.NicolM. J. (2010). Kinetics of the dissolution of ilmenite in sulfuric acid solutions under reducing conditions. Hydrometallurgy103 (1-4), 196204. 10.1016/j.hydromet.2010.03.019

  • 36

    ZhangY. J.YiY. T.LiW. X.LiangS. R.MaJ.ChengS. B.et al (2023). High absorptivity and ultra-wideband solar absorber based on Ti-Al2O3 cross elliptical disk arrays. Coatings13 (3), 531. 10.3390/coatings13030531

  • 37

    ZhouG.PengT.SunH.LiangY. (2013). The products transformation and formation mechanism in the roasting process of high Ti-bearing blast furnace slag with ammonium sulfate. Acta Petrologica Mineralogica32 (6), 893898.

  • 38

    ZhouZ.ZhangB.ZhuZ. (1999). A test of titania separation from high titania bearing blast furnace slag. Iron Steel Vanadium Titan.20 (4), 3740.

  • 39

    ZhuW. L.YiY. T.YiZ.BianL.YangH.ZhangJ. G.et al (2023). High confidence plasmonic sensor based on photonic crystal fibers with a U-shaped detection channel. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.25, 85838591. 10.1039/d2cp04605a

Summary

Keywords

Ti-bearing blast furnace slag, concentrated sulphuric acid, acidolysis, reaction process kinetics, sulphuric acid

Citation

Wang Y, Gao X, He S and Guo J (2024) Kinetics of extracting valuable components from Ti-bearing blast furnace slag by acidolysis with sulphuric acid. Front. Chem. 12:1369937. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2024.1369937

Received

13 January 2024

Accepted

29 January 2024

Published

08 February 2024

Volume

12 - 2024

Edited by

Shifa Wang, Chongqing Three Gorges University, China

Reviewed by

Jing Chen, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, China

Chao Liu, Northeast Petroleum University, China

Yougen Yi, Central South University, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Siqi He,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics