AUTHOR=Irfan Ali , Zahoor Ameer Fawad , Boulaamane Yassir , Javed Sadia , Hameed Huma , Maurady Amal , Muhammed Muhammed Tilahun , Ahmad Sajjad , Al-Mutairi Aamal A. , Shahzadi Irum , Al-Hussain Sami A. , Zaki Magdi E. A. 

TITLE=Computational exploration of acefylline derivatives as MAO-B inhibitors for Parkinson’s disease: insights from molecular docking, DFT, ADMET, and molecular dynamics approaches

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Chemistry

VOLUME=Volume 12 - 2024

YEAR=2024

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/chemistry/articles/10.3389/fchem.2024.1449165

DOI=10.3389/fchem.2024.1449165

ISSN=2296-2646

ABSTRACT=Monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) plays a pivotal role in the deamination process of monoamines, encompassing crucial neurotransmitters like dopamine and norepinephrine. The heightened interest in MAO-B inhibitors emerged after the revelation that this enzyme could potentially catalyze the formation of neurotoxic compounds from endogenous and exogenous sources.Computational screening methodologies serve as valuable tools in the quest for novel inhibitors, enhancing the efficiency of this pursuit. In this study, forty-three acefylline derivatives were docked against MAO-B enzyme for their chemotherapeutic potential and binding affinities that yielded GOLD fitness scores ranging from 33.21 to 75.22. Among them, five acefylline derivatives MAO-B14, MAO-B15, MAO-B16, MAO-B20, and MAO-B21 displayed binding affinities comparable to the both standards Istradefylline and Safinamide. These derivatives exhibiting hydrogen bonding interactions with key amino acids Phe167, Ile197/198, suggesting their strong potential as MAO-B inhibitors. Finally, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were conducted to evaluate the stability of examined acefylline derivatives over time. The simulations demonstrated that among the examined acefylline derivatives and standards, MAO-B21 stands out as the most stable candidate. DFT studies were also performed to optimize the geometries of the ligands and molecular docking was conducted to predict the orientations of the ligands within the binding cavity of the protein and to evaluate their molecular interactions. These results were also validated by simulation based binding free energies via MM-GBSA method. However, it is necessary to conduct in vitro as well as in vivo experiments to confirm and validate these findings in future studies.