AUTHOR=Baker Emily , Escott-Price Valentina 

TITLE=Polygenic Risk Scores in Alzheimer's Disease: Current Applications and Future Directions

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Digital Health

VOLUME=Volume 2 - 2020

YEAR=2020

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/digital-health/articles/10.3389/fdgth.2020.00014

DOI=10.3389/fdgth.2020.00014

ISSN=2673-253X

ABSTRACT=Genome-wide association studies have identified nearly 40 genome-wide significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) which are associated with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). Due to the polygenicity of AD, polygenic risk scores (PRS) have shown high potential for AD risk prediction. PRSs have been shown to successfully discriminate between AD cases and controls achieving a prediction accuracy of up to 84% based on area under the receiver operating curve. 
PRS can be restricted to SNPs which reside in biologically relevant gene-sets; the predictive value of these gene-sets is not as high as genome-wide PRS, but they may play an important role to identify mechanisms of disease development and inform biological experiments. 
Multiple methods are available to derive PRSs. All methods have advantages, but PRS produced using different methodologies are often not comparable, and results should be interpreted with care. Similarly, this is true when PRS is based on different background populations. 
With the exponential growth in development of digital electronic devices it is easy to calculate an individual’s disease risk using public databases. A major limitation for the utility of PRSs is that the risk score is sample and method dependent. Therefore, replicability and interpretability of PRS is an important issue. PRS can be used to determine the probability of developing disease which incorporates information about disease risk in the general population or in a specific AD risk group. It is essential to consult with genetic counsellors to ensure genetic risk is communicated appropriately.