Abstract
A numerical reaction-transport model was developed to simulate the effects of microbial activity and mineral reactions on the composition of porewater in a 230-m-thick Pleistocene interval drilled in the Peru-Chile Trench (Ocean Drilling Program, Site 1230). This site has porewater profiles similar to those along many continental margins, where intense methanogenesis occurs and alkalinity surpasses 100 mmol/L. Simulations show that microbial sulphate reduction, anaerobic oxidation of methane, and ammonium release from organic matter degradation only account for parts of total alkalinity, and excess CO2 produced during methanogenesis leads to acidification of porewater. Additional alkalinity is produced by slow alteration of primary aluminosilicate minerals to kaolinite and SiO2. Overall, alkalinity production in the methanogenic zone is sufficient to prevent dissolution of carbonate minerals; indeed, it contributes to the formation of cemented carbonate layers at a supersaturation front near the sulphate-methane transition zone. Within the methanogenic zone, carbonate formation is largely inhibited by cation diffusion but occurs rapidly if cations are transported into the zone via fluid conduits, such as faults. The simulation presented here provides fundamental insight into the diagenetic effects of the deep biosphere and may also be applicable for the long-term prediction of the stability and safety of deep CO2 storage reservoirs.
Introduction
Microbial activity below the seafloor (in the deep biosphere) affects global cycling of carbon. In sediments on many continental margins, microbes convert buried organic matter through a series of reactions to methane (CH4) and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), both of which can return back to the water column through advection or diffusion (e.g., ; ). In some areas, high rates of organic carbon decomposition lead to oversaturation of porewater with respect to different carbonate minerals (e.g., ; ; ; ; ; ). Precipitation of diagenetic carbonates can even occur within carbonate-free ocean margin sediment sequences (e.g., ; ; ). Importantly, these carbonates add to the total worldwide carbon burial flux, and variations in their accumulation over time may have contributed to past changes in global carbon cycling, such as during times of widespread anoxia (; ). Nevertheless, gaps remain in the understanding of organic carbon decomposition and diagenetic carbonate formation, particularly in sediment sequences characterized by strong methanogenesis.
While production of DIC drives diagenetic carbonate precipitation, a simultaneous increase in the pH buffering capacity and total alkalinity must happen to increase the activity of dissolved CO32− and, hence, the saturation state with respect to various carbonate phases. The total alkalinity (titration alkalinity) has been defined as “excess of proton acceptors over donors with respect to carbonic acid”: TA = [HCO3−] + 2 [CO32−] + [OH−] + [B(OH)4−] + [HPO42−] + 2 [PO43−] + [H3SiO4−] + [NH3] + [HS−] + 2 [S2−] − [H+] − [HF] − [HSO4−] − [H3PO4] (; ). Several microbially mediated reactions increase alkalinity, including iron-reduction (; ), organoclastic sulphate reduction (OSR), and anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM; ; ; ). In general, these processes progress with depth below the seafloor, according to their redox potential and free energy yield (e.g., ). They also affect alkalinity differently. Notably, OSR produces two moles of DIC and two moles of alkalinity per mole of sulphate consumed, with a 1:1 ratio of TA:DIC (Eq. 1):By contrast, AOM generates more alkalinity relative to DIC (TA:DIC = 2:1; Eq. 2):
In the absence of any terminal electron acceptor, subseafloor fermentation of organic matter can still occur, releasing CH4, organic acids, and CO2 to porewater. A dominant overall process is “methanogenesis”, which proceeds mainly through autotrophic reduction of CO2 with H2 as an electron donor (; ):Crucially, the overall pathway results in excess CO2, but without producing further alkalinity.
A current problem in our collective knowledge of the deep biosphere and the role of methanogenesis for subseafloor biogeochemical processes revolves around the fate of CO2 and extreme porewater alkalinity. Production of CO2 (Eq. 3) should lead to acidification and undersaturation of porewater with respect to carbonate minerals. This is because CO2 dissolves in water and generates protons, but does not change alkalinity (Eq. 4):
However, porewaters along continental margins and within zones of significant methanogenesis consistently exhibit very high alkalinity, often exceeding 50 mmol/L (Figure 1) and sometimes surpassing 160 mmol/L (). Furthermore, the high alkalinity mostly reflects dissolved HCO3− concentrations (except near depths of HS− production), the pH usually exceeds 7, and early diagenetic carbonate (dolomite) often has positive δ13C values, indicative of precipitation under methanogenenic conditions (; ). As side-stepped in various works (e.g., ; ), there is a “lost proton problem”. How can sufficient alkalinity, as HCO3−, occur in such sub-seafloor environments to the point of driving significant amounts of carbonate precipitation?
FIGURE 1
Several additional sources of alkalinity in marine sediments have been discussed in previous studies (e.g.,
While NH4+ accumulates in the porewater, it may adsorb to clay mineral surfaces, in exchange for Ca2+ and Mg2+, which are readily released into the porewater (
Several authors (e.g.,
Often silicate alteration reactions also show a loss of SiO2, which upon water uptake reacts to H4SiO4 and which, hence, does not contribute to total alkalinity production. As a consequence of Eq. 6, alkalinity also can be expressed by the balance of conservative ions. This has been shown by
Both ion exchange with NH4+ and silicate mineral alteration may enrich porewaters in dissolved Mg2+, Na+, and K+ (
In this study, we examine data from Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Site 1230 on the Peru Margin (
Study Site and Measured Porewater Profiles
Intense coastal upwelling and high primary productivity characterize surface waters along the Peruvian continental margin. In 2002, ODP Leg 201 drilled and cored Site 1230 on the lower slope of the Peru margin (9° 6.7525′ S / 80° 35.0100′ W; Supplementary Figure S1A) at 5,086 m water depth, and within 100 m from ODP Site 685. The site comprises five holes (A-E), from which cores collected sediment to 278 m below seafloor (mbsf). Except for a few short pressure cores to collect gas, sediment recovery over the upper 216 m was accomplished using an advanced hydraulic piston core (APC) tool while recovery below this depth was accomplished mostly using an extended core barrel (XCB) tool.
The overall sequence has two main lithological units, which match those recovered at Site 685 (Supplementary Figure S1B;
A sharp boundary at 216 mbsf delineates Unit I and Unit II, and marks a downward shift to strongly consolidated Miocene sediments. The boundary likely represents a décollement surface within the accretionary prism (
Porewater profiles show major changes in fluid composition with depth, including a steep and near linear negative sulphate gradient with a thin sulphate-methane transition zone (SMT) at approximately 9 mbsf. Sulphide reaches ca. 10 mmol/L at the SMT and decreases to zero at 20 mbsf. Below the SMT, a methanogenic zone prevails throughout the sequence. Extremely high concentrations of up to 300 mmol/L methane were reconstructed by
Material and Methods
Mineral Analysis
Sediment samples from ODP Site 1230 were selected from undisturbed core sections recovered from 6 to 254 mbsf. For bulk mineralogical analysis, powdered sediment samples were analysed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a Panalytical X’Pert PRO diffractometer (Cu-Kα radiation, 40 kV, 40 mA, step size 0.0167, 5 s per step).
For clay mineral separations, six sediment samples were slightly crushed by hand to pieces of approximately 3 mm. Organic matter was removed by oxidation with diluted H2O2, and the samples were further disaggregated with a 400 W ultrasonic probe for 3 min. The <2 μm grain-size fraction was separated from bulk sediment by sedimentation in an Atterberg-cylinder for 24 h and 33 min (
Reaction Transport Model
Concentrations of dissolved species were simulated with a one-dimensional reaction-transport model (Figure 2) according to Fick’s second law of diffusion in the form given by
FIGURE 2

Flow chart representation of the basic reaction-transport and precipitation model, including feedbacks, data fitting, and output. TOC0 is the initial total organic carbon content (wt%) at the time of sediment deposition. The parameters a and ν describe the function of organic matter degradation according to
The second term on the righthand side of Eq. 7 accounts for diffusion, where D is the diffusion constant (m2/s; see below). The tortuosity τ was calculated from porosity according to
The third term on the righthand side of Eq. 7 represents any source or sink (or combination thereof), where R is the rate of production or consumption of the solute (mmol L−1 a−1). For dissimilatory metabolic reactions (sulphate reduction and methanogenesis, according to Eqs 1, 3), the source and sink terms are stoichiometrically related to the degradation rate of TOC. The degradation of TOC was calculated using the reactive continuum (RC) model of
For sulphate reduction and AOM, a Monod kinetic term was applied (
Due to the high pressure and low temperature at >5,000 m water depth, free gas phase should not reside within the porewater over the upper few hundred metres below the seafloor. However, dissolved CH4 concentrations can surpass those for gas hydrate saturation. The saturation conditions were calculated according to an approach given by
Cation Exchange on Mineral Surfaces
For the calculation of cation exchange on clay minerals, we assumed that adsorbed ions are in equilibrium with surrounding pore fluids. This is justified, because radiotracer experiments (
Speciation and Mineral Reactions
Measured concentrations of dissolved ions in porewater of marine sediment generally do not account for speciation. For example, Mg concentrations determined via inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry, such as done on ODP Leg 201, inextricably include those from Mg2+, MgCl+, and MgSO4(0) (e.g.,
The saturation indices (SI = log IAP – log KSP) of calcite, dolomite, and all silicate phases detected by XRD were calculated for in-situ temperature and pressure conditions. Rates of mineral precipitation or dissolution were calculated as k·SI (cf.
Activity correction was calculated according to the Brønsted-Guggenheim-Satchard model (also known as specific ion interaction theory, SIT;
In Eq. 14 the activity coefficient γi is calculated for ion “i” as a function of ionic charge z, the ion radius r, the ionic strength I of the solution, and the sum of interactions with each ion k in the solution, with the interaction coefficient ϵ between ions “i” and “k” and the molar concentration ck.
Parameterization and Boundary Conditions
The reaction-transport equation was solved using the finite differences method with an explicit-implicit scheme. The non-linear terms, including different source and sink terms, were solved explicitly. The simulations were run until a steady state was reached. All parameters, their symbols, values (or ranges), units, and references are listed in Table 1. The porewater concentration data used for fitting the model are mostly ODP Leg 201 shipboard data (
TABLE 1
| Parameter | Symbol | Value | Unit | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domain and physical constraints | ||||
| Water depth | Zw | 5086 | m | |
| Domain size | ZD | 230 | m | Pleistocene; |
| Depth interval | dz | 1 | m | — |
| Time step | dt | 100 | a | — |
| Total duration | T | 2.3*106 | a | To reach steady state |
| Salinity | S | 35 | ‰ | Sea water |
| T-gradient | Tgrad | 0.0343 | °C/m | |
| Bottom seawater temperature | BST | 2 | °C | |
| Density | Dsw | 1029 | kg/m3 | Sea water |
| Initial porosity | Φ0 | 0.78 | — | Fitted to data; |
| Porosity at infinity | Φ | 0.63 | — | Fitted to data; |
| Porosity decay constant | b | 60 | — | Fitted to data; |
| Sedimentation rate at infinity | ω | 0.1 | m/ka | Min. for TOC Degradation |
| TOC degradation | ||||
| Initial TOC (during sedimentation) | TOC0 | 3.5 | wt% | Based on data fitting |
| Grain density of sediment | ρs | 2.45*103 | kg/L | Average based on data |
| Initial age of organic matter | aRC | 25000 | a | |
| RC-parameter | ν | 0.33 | a | |
| C/N-ratio | r | 9.85 | — | Fitted to data; |
| Kinetic constants for metamolic and mineral reactions | ||||
| Half saturation constant for sulphate reduction | Ks | 1 | mM | Amdt et al. (2006) |
| For high-affinity sulphate reduction | Ks’ | 2.6*10−3 | mM | |
| For AOM | Ks, AOM | 1 | mM | |
| First order rate constant for AOM | kAOM | 8*10−3 | a−1 | Fitted to porewater date |
| Cation exchange capacity | CEC | 100 | (meq/100 g) | typical for smectite; |
| Weight fraction of exchange in solid phase | EX | 0.2 | — | Estimate from XRD |
| Rate constant for calcite precipitation | kcal | 0 | mmol/(L*a) | Based on diagenetic dolomite |
| Rate constant for dolomite precipitation | kdol | 0.0005 | mmol/(L*a) | Based on diagenetic dolomite precipitation above SI = 1 |
| Rate constant for chlorite precipitation | kchl | 0 | mmol/(L*a) | Fitted to pore water chemistry only disolution above 100 mbsf |
| Rate constant for K-vermiculite precipitation | kverm | 0.00005 | mmol/(L*a) | Fitted to pore water chemistry only disolution above 100 mbsf |
| Rate constant for smectite, illite, K-feldspar and albite were assumed as zero as these minerals are near to saturated | ||||
| Rate constant for kaolinite precipitation | kkao | Linked to AI | mmol/(L*a) | Where supersaturated only precipitation |
| Rate constant for cristobalite precipitation | kop | 0.01 | mmol/(L*a) | Fitted to pore water chemistry disolution and Precipitation |
| Boundary Conditions | ||||
| Upper BC* | ||||
| Alkalinity | Conc. | 2.3 | mmol/L | Sea water concentration |
| C(4) | Conc. | 2.4 | mmol/L | Sea water concentration |
| C(−4) | Conc. | 0 | mmol/L | Sea water concentration |
| N(−3) | Conc. | 1 | mmol/L | Sea water concentration |
| Ca | Conc. | 10.3 | mmol/L | Sea water concentration |
| Mg | Conc. | 52 | mmol/L | Sea water concentration |
| Na | Conc. | 470 | mmol/L | Sea water concentration |
| K | Conc. | 10.2 | mmol/L | Sea water concentration |
| Cl | Conc. | 550 | mmol/L | Sea water concentration |
| S(6) | Conc. | 28 | mmol/L | Sea water concentration |
| S(−2) | Conc. | 0.0001 | mmol/L | Sea water concentration |
| Si | Conc. | 0.1 | mmol/L | Sea water concentration |
| Al | Conc. | 0.0000005 | mmol/L | Sea water concentration |
| *also used as initial conditions | ||||
| Lower BC | ||||
| Alkalinity | Conc. | 100 | mmol/L | Fitted to porewater data |
| C(4) | Conc. | 180 | mmol/L | Fitted to porewater data |
| C(−4) | Conc. | Ghsol | mmol/L | Gas hydrated solubility |
| N(−3) | Conc. | 3.2 | mmol/L | Fitted to porewater data |
| Ca | Conc. | 10.3 | mmol/L | Fitted to porewater data |
| Mg | Conc. | 44 | mmol/L | Fitted to porewater data |
| Na | Conc. | 450 | mmol/L | Fitted to porewater data |
| K | Conc. | 14 | mmol/L | Fitted to porewater data |
| Cl | Conc. | 520 | mmol/L | Fitted to porewater data |
| S(6) | Conc. | 0 | mmol/L | Fitted to porewater data |
| S(−2) | Conc. | 0.0001 | mmol/L | Fitted to porewater data |
| Si | Conc. | 0.95 | mmol/L | Saturation concentration at P/T conditions |
| Al | Conc. | 0.0000005 | mmol/L | Conc. to keep kaolinite supersaturated |
List of parameters and values used for the reaction transport model.
A minimal long-term sedimentation rate of 0.1 m/ka was assumed based on the thickness of the Pleistocene-Holocene interval of 230 m according to the Leg 112 age model (
We used the rate constants of AOM given in
Cation concentrations were fitted to the measured porewater data by varying the adsorption constants, using a CEC of 100 meq/100 g based on
For speciation and calculation of saturation states we used the parameters in the database for the specific ion interaction theory, given in the Phreeqc package (sit.dat database). The minerals were selected from the database according to the mineral assemblage detected by XRD and according to their stoichiometric composition commonly observed in marine sediments (e.g.,
TABLE 2
| Mineral name (in database) | Stoichiometry |
|---|---|
| Albite-low | Na Al Si3 O8 |
| Calcite | Ca CO3 |
| Clinochlore | Mg5 Al2 Si3 O10 (OH)8 |
| Cristobalite | Si O2 |
| Dolomite | Ca Mg (CO3)2 |
| Illite-Mg | K0.85 Mg0.25 Al2.35 Si3.4 O10 (OH)2 |
| Kaolinite | Al2 (Si2 O5) (OH)4 |
| Microcline | K Al Si3 O8 |
| Montmorillonite-BCMg | Mg0.17 Mg0.34 Al1.66 Si4 O10 (OH)2 |
| Vermiculite-K | K0.86 Mg3 Si3.14 Al0.86 O10 (OH)2 |
| Vermiculite-Mg | Mg0.43 Mg3 Si3.14 Al0.86 O10 (OH)2 |
List of minerals and their stoichiometric compositions selected from the sit.dat database.
Analytical Results
Bulk Mineralogy
Bulk XRD-analyses (Figure 3A) show quartz (peak at 3.34 Å; 26.67° 2θ) as the most abundant phase. The second most abundant phase is feldspar, whereby albite/anorthite (3.19 Å; 27.92° 2θ) is more abundant than K-feldspar (3.24 Å, 27.53° 2θ) in all samples. Small amounts of mica or illite (peak-positions at 10 Å, 8.83° 2θ) are present in all samples. Calcite is detected in the samples from 6 mbsf and 57 to 144 mbsf. Two separate carbonate phases, a low-Mg calcite at 3.03 Å (29.4° 2θ) and a Mg calcite at 3.02 Å (29.5° 2θ), occur. A halite (NaCl) peak at 2.82 Å (31.7° 2θ) is usually present as the samples were not washed before analysis.
FIGURE 3

X-ray pattern of analysed sediment samples from ODP Site 1230. (A) Bulk sediment showing quartz (Qtz), feldspar (Fsp), mica, and calcite (Cal). The spectra are arranged in the sequence as they occur through the drilled core. Halite and gypsum (Gy) usually form due to evaporation during sample storage. (B) X-ray patterns of Mg-glycerol saturated clay fractions, arranged in the same sequence as they occur through the drilled core. The spectra were interpreted to indicate smectite (Sm), vermiculite (Verm), chlorite (Chl), kaolinite (Kao), and illite, based on comparison of spectra from the fractions treated with Mg-ions, K-saturated fractions treated with ethylene glycol, and fractions heated to 550°C (shown for sample 21.8 mbsf; Supplementary Material).
Clay Mineral Analysis
All analysed samples contain different amounts of smectite, vermiculite, chlorite, kaolinite, and illite (Figure 3B). Additionally, the clay fractions contain small amounts of quartz, feldspar, and calcite (only in one sample at 70.3 mbsf). Here, the identification of the clay minerals is explained for the sample from 21.8 mbsf (Supplementary Figure S2). Smectite was identified by a broad peak at 14.1 Å (6.3° 2θ) with Mg saturation which shifted to 11.8 Å (7.5° 2θ) with K saturation and collapsed to 9.9 Å (8.9° 2θ) after heating to 550°C. Saturation of the K-sample with ethylene glycol expanded smectite again to 16.8 Å (5.3° 2θ), the Mg-sample with glycerol to 18 Å (4.9° 2θ). Chlorite was identified by the peaks at 14.1, 7.07, 4.7 and 3.53 Å (6.3°, 12.5°, 18.8°, and 25.1° 2θ), which did not change position during treatments. Illite peaks at 9.9, 4.97 Å, and 3.33 Å (8.9°, 17.8°, and 26.7° 2θ) also kept their positions. Kaolinite peaks at 7.13 Å and 3.57 Å (12.4° and 24.9° 2θ) disappeared after heating to 550°C. Mg-saturated vermiculite was recognized based on a strong peak at 14 Å (6.3° 2θ), which shifted to 10 Å (8.83° 2θ) with K saturation, while saturation with Mg and glycerol (MgGly) did not change the 14 Å peak position (only present in traces in the sample from 21.8 mbsf, but more abundant in the other samples).
Looking at a depth plot of the Mg + glycerol saturated clay fractions (Figure 3B), it is obvious that only the uppermost two samples contain large amounts of smectite (18 Å, 4.9° 2θ). The deeper samples show only small smectite peaks, but additionally contain another expandable clay mineral, vermiculite (14 Å, 6.3° 2θ). Illite, chlorite, and kaolinite are present in samples of all depths.
Model Results and Discussion
Biogeochemical Reactions and Effects on Alkalinity
The basic parameters used for the geochemical simulation, temperature, pressure, sedimentation rate, porosity, TOC content, and C/N ratio were fitted as good as possible to the measured data (Figures 4A–D; Supplementary Figure S3). Modelled porewater profiles, shown in Figure 5, reach a steady state after <1 Ma, even though 2.3 Ma are needed for burial of the gas hydrates below 230 m at a sedimentation rate of 0.1 m/ka. Therefore, the time needed to reach a steady state is well within the time frame of deposition of the Pleistocene interval, throughout which the sediment composition does not fundamentally change. The geochemistry within the underlying Miocene interval is decoupled by fluid flow along the décollement, essentially setting the boundary conditions for the Pleistocene evolution of the porewater profiles.
FIGURE 4

Sediment properties and organic matter content vs. depth at ODP Site 1230: (A) porewater temperature and hydrostatic pressure; (B) sediment age and porosity (data from
FIGURE 5

Measured (solid symbols) and simulated porewater concentration profiles (lines) vs. depth: (A) sulphate and methane; (B) ammonium; (C) inorganic carbon species; (D) pH (dashed line: after equilibration with headspace); (E) dissolved inorganic carbon and total alkalinity; (F) Ca and Mg; (G) K, Na, and Cl; and (H) total Si. All concentrations are reported in mmol/L. Dotted lines: simulation including microbial reactions; solid lines: simulation including microbial and mineral reactions. Measured data are from
The measured sulphate profile is well reproduced by the model (Figure 5A), with an SMT at 9 mbsf. However, the rather linear gradient of the measured sulphate profile is difficult to reconcile with sulphate reduction rates of more than 1,000 pmol/cm3d typically measured near the surface using radiotracer experiments (e.g.,
As a result of the constrained metabolic activity, bicarbonate shows a steep increase above the SMT, while dissolved CO2 reaches its highest concentrations only below 100 mbsf (Figure 5C). The high CO2 concentrations relate to the pH drop to about 6 in the methanogenic zone (short-dashed line in Figure 5D). The simulated DIC increases with depth to more than 250 mmol/L around 150 mbsf (Figure 5E), which is considerably larger than measured data, which reach only ca. 150 mmol/L. This is expected, since a significant portion of DIC was probably lost during core recovery. In-situ loss of CO2 (e.g.,
The top 10 mbsf are characterized by a strong increase in porewater alkalinity, which is largely the result of sulphate reduction and AOM. However, below the SMT (∼9 mbsf) methanogenesis would only cause a small increase in alkalinity, due to the release of ammonium. Phosphate concentrations only reach up to 0.5 mmol/L (
Mineral Reactions and Their Effect on Porewater Chemistry
In the microbial activity scenario discussed above several conservative ions that count towards total alkalinity are not reproduced correctly (Figures 5F,G; dotted lines). Most prominently, the increase in Mg2+ significantly contributes to total alkalinity (TAec). The increase in Mg2+ may be a result of release in exchange for NH4+ (
The alternative effect that could modify the ion content of the porewater would be recrystallization (
Analysed samples contain various amounts of vermiculite, chlorite, illite, smectite, and kaolinite, but there is no significant change in the peak pattern with depth indicative of ongoing phyllosilicate alteration. Also, the depletion of smectite below 70 mbsf must result from changing sedimentation, because smectite remains supersaturated and would rather form than dissolve throughout the profile. The coexistence of more phases than allowed by the Gibbs phase rule is indicated by the results from XRD (Figures 3A,B), so that equilibrium of the solution with all mineral phases cannot be reached. Instead, they are probably limited by reaction kinetics.
The model results show that increasing acidification leads to a minor decrease in the saturation indices of the silicate phases k-feldspar, albite, smectite, and illite, (Figures 6A,B), while they remain supersaturated at the SMT. In contrast, vermiculite and chlorite are strongly undersaturated below the SMT (Figure 6C). Porewater (Figure 6D) is most supersaturated with respect to kaolinite throughout the section and only slightly undersaturated at the sediment-water interface. Even if the simulated saturation indices are somewhat arbitrary, because the Al concentrations in porewater are assumed, the response to pH and ionic compositions seems reasonable. In particular, the suggested dissolution and precipitation reactions based on the saturation states correspond to known mineral alteration reactions: vermiculite and chlorite commonly weather to illite, and illite weathers to smectite (
FIGURE 6

Saturation indices (SI) of silicate minerals (A) albite and K-feldspar, (B) illite and smectite, (C) vermiculite and chlorite, (D) kaolinite and cristobalite, and (E) calcite and dolomite.
By allowing the undersaturated silicates to dissolve and supersaturated silicates to precipitate, while adjusting the kinetic constants of different mineral phases, it was possible to improve the fit of porewater profiles to the measured data, in particular the increase of Mg2+ and K+ (Figures 5F,G; solid lines). It was found that the simulated porewater profiles best fit to the measured data if the reaction rate decreases exponentially with depth (Supplementary Figure S4). The dissolution of minerals other than chlorite and vermiculite had no significant effect on porewater chemistry, as their departure from equilibrium was minimal (Supplementary Figure S5). While the dissolution of chlorite only delivers Mg2+, K-vermiculite also provides sufficient K+ to reproduce the K+ profile. Also, a minor amount of Na+ may originate from mineral reactions, although albite, the Na-endmember of plagioclase, is not undersaturated and is, thus, unlikely a significant source of Na. After inclusion of additional conservative cations released from silicate alteration, the simulated alkalinity almost entirely matches the measured alkalinity (Figure 5E, solid line).
Alternatively, also volcanic glass may react with porewater and provide in particular K+ and Na+. Volcanic glass in ash layers is fairly reactive and may undergo the generalized reaction (
Although this has been suggested as a source of alkalinity for diagenetic carbonate formation elsewhere (e.g.,
Below 150 mbsf, full speciation using the measured concentrations and alkalinity would result in a charge imbalance. Since the model conserves charges, it cannot be forced to adopt this unbalance. Chloride was arbitrarily chosen to compensate the excess of negative charges, so that charge balance is maintained, which results in a decrease in Cl− concentration. Despite this uncertainty near the bottom of the domain, the high alkalinity between 50 and 200 mbsf is real and can only be reached by including silicate alteration.
In addition to these mineral reactions, opal needs discussion as the sediment contains abundant diatoms (
Overall, alteration of silicate minerals contributes to the very high total alkalinity (∼150 mmol/L) measured at ODP Site 1230. This additional alkalinity effect significantly buffers acidification of the porewater by the production of CO2 during microbial methanogenesis. In contrast, the production of alkalinity by anaerobic metabolisms (organoclastic sulphate reduction and AOM) and the dissimilatory release of ammonium alone would not be sufficient to explain the measured alkalinity. High (>80 mmol/L) alkalinity concentrations characterize porewaters recovered from within the uppermost few hundred metres below the seafloor at many drill sites along continental margins of the world. Away from the Peru Margin, examples include DSDP Site 262 (Timor Sea, Indian Ocean;
Factors Controlling Carbonate Precipitation
Having established the effects of biogeochemical activity and silicate alteration on the alkalinity and DIC content, we can now assess the factors controlling the saturation state of carbonates (Figure 6E). Calcite and dolomite are only slightly supersaturated or undersaturated in the bottom water, which is partially due to high amounts of CO2 produced by aerobic respiration in the water column, below the oxygen minimum zone at a water depth of 5,000 m (e.g.,
In the methanogenic zone below 9 mbsf, DIC increase to 250 mmol/L would cause a pH decrease to <6, but taking into account alkalinity production from mineral reactions more moderate pH values above 6 are reached (Figure 5D). The saturation indices of carbonates remain near saturation, which is due to the buffering effect of the alkalinity reaching 150 mmol/L near 100 mbsf. Hence, alkalinity production due to NH4+ release and silicate alteration largely prevents the dissolution of carbonates in the methanogenic zone, as it would be expected based on CO2 production alone. Carbonates may even become slightly supersaturated due to this effect, but their precipitation would be hampered by the slow supply of Ca2+ due to the long diffusion distances from the seafloor.
Calcite was detected by XRD in the bulk sediments in the top 150 mbsf, with higher amounts between 50 and 150 mbsf (Figure 3A). This carbonate is clearly part of the sediment, whereas an ex-situ precipitation due to degassing during core recovery can be excluded, as from porewater with 4 mmol/L Ca2+ only ca. 1 g CaCO3 per kg sediment could precipitate, which would be far below the detection limit of the XRD analysis. Besides low-Mg calcite also traces of Mg-calcite were detected. While the calcite may be diagenetic, precipitation of significant amounts of carbonate is probably not possible at present core depth, due to lack of Ca supply. Thus, the disseminated calcite detected between 50 and 150 mbsf formed most likely in the past, when the according sediment was located sufficiently near to the sediment surface to allow for a sufficient supply of Ca2+ from seawater, but not as shallow as during the formation of the lithified layer of dolomite at 6.5 mbsf.
The formation of hard lithified diagenetic carbonates vs. fine disseminated carbonate is a longstanding problem (cf.
FIGURE 7

Conceptual model to explain the formation of diagenetic carbonates in relation to the evolution of the methanogenic zone: (A) During Pleistocene sedimentation over the Miocene, dissimilatory reactions lead to the onset of a methanogenic zone. (B) Within the expanding methanogenic zone alkalinity builds up, but insignificant carbonates (disseminated calcite or dolomite; blue shaded area) are precipitated as the diffusion distance for Ca2+ and Mg2+ are too long. (C) The methanogenic zone has now further expanded and a gas hydrate zone has established. The gradients near the surface are steep, with a shallow SMT driving carbonate precipitation (lithified dolomites; blue bars). Also at depth, fluid flow along the décollement provides Ca2+, inducing carbonate precipitation. The two types of dolomite show contrasting δ13C values, derived from dissimilatory sulphate reduction and methanogenesis, respectively.
While carbonate formation in relation with AOM has been discussed, it is still not clear how carbonates (in particular dolomite) with a strongly positive carbon isotope signature may form. A 20-cm-thick, hard-lithified dolomite breccia was recovered from 230 mbsf at Site 1230, exhibiting a δ13C of up to 15‰ (
More extensive dolomite layers showing a methanogenic δ13C signature are found, for example, in the Miocene Monterey Fm. of California (e.g.,
Conclusion
The Neogene sediment sequence at ODP Site 1230 in the Peru-Chile Trench contains porewaters with extreme alkalinity, reaching ∼150 mmol/L at ca. 100 mbsf. Full-speciation reaction-transport modelling shows that these concentrations result from several reactions. Much of the alkalinity is produced by organoclastic sulphate reduction and AOM in the upper part of the profile but also through release of ammonium from organic matter degradation throughout the sequence. The alteration of silicate minerals, in particular vermiculite and chlorite to kaolinite and opal-C/T, contributes substantial amounts of Mg2+ and K+ and further increases alkalinity in the methanogenic zone. In combination, microbial processes and clay mineral alteration produce sufficient alkalinity within the methanogenic zone to buffer acidification caused by increased DIC (up to 250 mmol/L) from dissimilation of organic matter and, thus, to prevent undersaturation and dissolution of carbonates. Within the methanogenic zone, diagenetic carbonate formation is largely calcium-limited, due to the long diffusion distances, but dolomite beds readily form if Ca2+ is supplied, such as at the SMT or along a fault zone. The SMT dolomites generally show a negative δ13C signature, whereas dolomites forming within the methanogenic zone show a positive δ13C signature, but in the absence of a gas phase, a shift of the dolomitization front due to CO2 degassing does not occur within the gas hydrate stability zone.
While our simulation provides insight into carbonate diagenesis in deep methanogenic zones, it also would be applicable to human-made CO2 storage reservoirs. Our study shows that reservoirs rich in specific clay minerals, vermiculite and chlorite, would have an extremely high capacity to trap CO2 as bicarbonate, although the kinetics of these reactions are rather slow. In any case, having a quantitative model at hand that can realistically simulate carbonate diagenesis in marine sediments will be essential to understand the role of sub-surface fluid-microbe-mineral interactions in the global carbon cycle.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author contributions
PM: Design of the study, supervision, developing the model, interpretion, writing the manuscript; GH: Modelling with Phreeqc, wrote early version; EP: Advising numerical modelling, provided comments to the manuscript; SG: X-ray diffraction, clay mineral analysis, comments to the manuscript; GD: Shipboard and shore-based porewater analysis, comments to the manuscript; CB: Code writing in C++; BL: Code writing, code testing, advice for mathematical solutions, comments to the manuscript.
Funding
This research used samples and data provided by the Ocean Drilling Program (now International Ocean Discovery Program, IODP), sponsored by the participating countries. PM was further supported by the European Union through Marie-Curie Actions MRTN-CT-2006-035868 (project GRASP), and PIEF-GA-2013-626025 (project TRIADOL) and be the Swiss National Science Foundation SNF through project PA00P2-126221. BL acknowledges additional funding from the Helmholtz Association (Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research).
Acknowledgments
We thank David Parkhurst for providing helpful explanations to the programme Phreeqc by responding to our question on the Phreeqc forum (https://www.phreeqcusers.org). We thank Benjamin Huet, Martin Schöpfer, and Bernhard Grasemann for providing help to solve problems with programming. Rainer Abart and Stephan Krämer provided further advice to the geochemistry. We also thank Steve Schäfer and Mischa Kim of the MathWorks Support Team for help with connecting the Matlab code to Phreeqc in an earlier version of our model. We thank two reviewers for their constructive comments.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2021.756591/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AloisiG.WallmannK.DrewsM.BohrmannG. (2004). Evidence for the Submarine Weathering of Silicate Minerals in Black Sea Sediments: Possible Implications for the marine Li and B Cycles. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.5, Q04007. 10.1029/2003gc000639
2
Amiotte SuchetP.ProbstJ. L.LudwigW. (2003). Worldwide Distribution of continental Rock Lithology: Implications for the Atmospheric/soil CO2 Uptake by continental Weathering and Alkalinity River Transport to the Oceans. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles17, 1038–1051. 10.1029/2002gb001891
3
ArcherD. E.BuffettB. A.McGuireP. C. (2012). A Two-Dimensional Model of the Passive Coastal Margin Deep Sedimentary Carbon and Methane Cycles. Biogeosciences9, 2859–2878. 10.5194/bg-9-2859-2012
4
ArndtS.BrumsackH.-J.WirtzK. W. (2006). Cretaceous Black Shales as Active Bioreactors: A Biogeochemical Model for the Deep Biosphere Encountered during ODP Leg 207 (Demerara Rise). Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta70, 408–425. 10.1016/j.gca.2005.09.010
5
ArndtS.HetzelA.BrumsackH.-J. (2009). Evolution of Organic Matter Degradation in Cretaceous Black Shales Inferred from Authigenic Barite: a Reaction-Transport Model. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta73, 2000–2022. 10.1016/j.gca.2009.01.018
6
ArndtS.JørgensenB. B.LaRoweD. E.MiddelburgJ. J.PancostR. D.RegnierP. (2013). Quantifying the Degradation of Organic Matter in marine Sediments: A Review and Synthesis. Earth-Science Rev.123, 53–86. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.02.008
7
ArningE. T.BerkW.SchulzH. M. (2012). Quantitative Geochemical Modeling along a Transect off Peru: Carbon Cycling in Time and Space, and the Triggering Factors for Carbon Loss and Storage. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles26, GB4012. 10.1029/2011GB004156
8
BakerP. A.BurnsS. J. (1985). Occurrence and Formation of Dolomite in Organic-Rich continental Margin Sediments. AAPG Bull.69, 1917–1930. 10.1306/94885570-1704-11d7-8645000102c1865d
9
BickleM.ChadwickA.HuppertH. E.HallworthM.LyleS. (2007). Modelling Carbon Dioxide Accumulation at Sleipner: Implications for Underground Carbon Storage. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.255, 164–176. 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.12.013
10
BoatmanC. D.MurrayJ. W. (1982). Modeling Exchangeable NH4 + Adsorption in marine Sediments: Process and Controls of Adsorption1,2. Limnol. Oceanogr.27, 99–110. 10.4319/lo.1982.27.1.0099
11
BoudreauB. P. (1997). Diagenetic Models and Their Implementation: Modelling Transport and Reactions in Aquatic Sediments. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
12
BoudreauB. P.MeysmanF. J. R.MiddelburgJ. J. (2004). Multicomponent Ionic Diffusion in Porewaters: Coulombic Effects Revisited. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.222, 653–666. 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.02.034
13
BoudreauB. P.RuddickB. R. (1991). On a Reactive Continuum Representation of Organic Matter Diagenesis. Am. J. Sci.291, 507–538. 10.2475/ajs.291.5.507
14
BrønstedJ. N. (1921). Studies on Solubility. IV. The Principle of the Specific Interaction of Ions. J. Am. Chem. Soc.44, 877–898.
15
BurdigeD. J.KomadaT. (2013). Using Ammonium Pore Water Profiles to Assess Stoichiometry of Deep Remineralization Processes in Methanogenic continental Margin Sediments. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.14, 1626–1643. 10.1002/ggge.20117
16
BurnsS. J.BakerP. A. (1987). A Geochemical Study of Dolomite in the Monterey Formation, California. J. Sediment. Petrol.57, 128–139. 10.1306/212f8ac6-2b24-11d7-8648000102c1865d
17
ChamleyH. (1989) Clay Sedimentology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 623 pp. ISBN 978-3-540-50889-2.
18
ChatterjeeS.DickensG. R.BhatnagarG.ChapmanW. G.DuganB.SnyderG. T.et al (2011). Pore Water Sulfate, Alkalinity, and Carbon Isotope Profiles in Shallow Sediment Above Marine Gas Hydrate Systems: A Numerical Modeling Perspective. J. Geophys. Res.116, 1–25. 10.1029/2011JB008290
19
ClaypoolG. E.KaplanI. R. (1974). “The Origin and Distribution of Methane in marine Sediments,” in ” in Natural Gases In Marine Sediments. Editor KaplanI. R. (New York: Plenum Press), 99–139. 10.1007/978-1-4684-2757-8_8
20
ColbournG.RidgwellA.LentonT. M. (2015). The Time Scale of the Silicate Weathering Negative Feedback on Atmospheric CO2. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles29 (5), 583–596. 10.1002/2014GB005054
21
ConradR. (1999). Contribution of Hydrogen to Methane Production and Control of Hydrogen Concentrations in Methanogenic Soils and Sediments. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.28, 193–202. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1999.tb00575.x
22
ContrerasS.MeisterP.LiuB.Prieto-MollarX.HinrichsK.-U.KhaliliA.et al (2013). Cyclic 100-ka (Glacial-interglacial) Migration of Subseafloor Redox Zonation on the Peruvian Shelf. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.110, 18098–18103. 10.1073/pnas.1305981110
23
CookP. J. (1974). Geochemistry and Diagenesis of Interstitial Fluids and Associated Calcareous Oozes, Deep Sea Drilling Project, Leg 27, Timor Trough. Init. Rep. Deap Sea Drill. Project27, 463–480. 10.2973/dsdp.proc.27.119.1974
24
D’HondtS.JørgensenB. B.MillerJ.BatzkeA.BlakeR.CraggB. A.et al (2004). Distributions of Microbial Activities in Deep Subseafloor Sediments. Science306, 2216–2221.
25
D’HondtS. L.JørgensenB. B.MillerD. J. (2003). Proc. ODP, Init. Repts. 201. College Station TXUSA: Ocean Drilling Program, Texas A&M University. 77845-9547. The shipboard scientific party
26
DickensG. R. (2003). Rethinking the Global Carbon Cycle with a Large, Dynamic and Microbially Mediated Gas Hydrate Capacitor. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.213, 169–183. 10.1016/s0012-821x(03)00325-x
27
DicksonA. G. (1981). An Exact Definition of Total Alkalinity and a Procedure for the Estimation of Alkalinity and Total Inorganic Carbon from Titration Data. Deep Sea Res. A: Oceanographic Res. Pap.28, 609–623. 10.1016/0198-0149(81)90121-7
28
DonohueC. M.SnyderG. T.DickensG. R. (2006). “Data Report: Major Cation Concentrations of Interstitial Waters Collected from Deep Sediments of Eastern Equatorial Pacific and Peru Margin (ODP Leg 201),” in Proc. ODP, Sci. Results 201. Editors JørgensenB. B., 1–19, Ocean Drilling Program, College Station, Texas. 10.2973/odp.proc.sr.201.104.2006
29
DuanZ.MøllerN.WeareJ. H. (1992). An Equation of State for the CH4-CO2-H2O System: I. Pure Systems from 0 to 1000°C and 0 to 8000 Bar. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta56, 2605–2617. 10.1016/0016-7037(92)90347-l
30
EngelhardtW.FüchtbauerH.MüllerG. (1974). Sedimentary Petrology, Part 1: Methods in Sedimentary Petrology, Vol. 1. Stuttgart, Germany: Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
31
EslingerE.PevearD. R. (1988). “Clay Minerals and Sandstone Diagenesis,” in Clay Minerals For Petroleum Geologists And Engineers. Editors EslingerE.PevearD., 22, 6. 1–6.29.SEPM Short Course
32
FroelichP. N.KlinkhammerG. P.BenderM. L.LuedtkeN. A.HeathG. R.CullenD.et al (1979). Early Oxidation of Organic Matter in Pelagic Sediments of the Eastern Equatorial Atlantic: Suboxic Diagenesis. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta43 (7), 1075–1090. 10.1016/0016-7037(79)90095-4
33
GarrisonR. E.KastnerM.ZengerD. H. (1984). Dolomites of the Monterey Formation and Other Organic-Rich Units. Los Angeles, California: SEPM, Pacific Section, 215.
34
GaucherE.RobelinC.MatrayJ. M.NégrelG.GrosY.HeitzJ. F.et al (2004). ANDRA Underground Research Laboratory: Interpretation of the Mineralogical and Geochemical Data Acquired in the Callovian-Oxfordian Formation by Investigative Drilling. Phys. Chem. Earth, Parts A/B/C29, 55–77. 10.1016/j.pce.2003.11.006
35
GoldichS. S. (1938). A Study in Rock-Weathering. J. Geology.46, 17–58. 10.1086/624619
36
GrentheI.PlyasunovA. (1997). On the Use of Semiempirical Electrolyte Theories for Modeling of Solution Chemical Data. Pure Appl. Chem.69, 951–958. 10.1351/pac199769050951
37
GuggenheimE. A.TurgeonJ. C. (1955). Specific Interaction of Ions. Trans. Faraday Soc.51, 747–761. 10.1039/tf9555100747
38
IngleJ. C.Jr.SuyehiroK.von BreymannM. T. (1990). “Japan Sea,” in Proc. ODP, Init. Repts. (College Station, TX, 128. (Ocean Drilling Program).
39
JasmundK.LagalyG. (1993). Tonminerale und Tone: Struktur, Eigenschaften, Anwendungen und Einsatz in Industrie und Umwelt. Darmstadt: Steinkopff. 3-7985-0923-9.
40
KasinaM.MorozovaD.MichalikM.PudloD.WuerdemannH. (2014). Impact of Gas Storage on Reservoir Rocks - Long-Term Study to Investigate the Effects on Mineral Content and Fluid Chemistry. Energ. Proced.59, 418–424. 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.10.397
41
KastanjaM. M.DiekmannB.HenrichR. (2006). Controls on Carbonate and Terrigenous Deposition in the Incipient Benguela Upwelling System during the Middle to the Late Miocene (ODP Sites 1085 and 1087). Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.241, 515–530. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.05.004
42
KastnerM.ElderfieldH.MartinJ. B.SuessE.KvenvoldenK. A.GarrisonR. E. (1990). “Diagenesis and Interstitial-Water Chemistry at the Peruvian Continental Margin, Major Constituents and Strontium Isotopes,” in, Proc. ODP, Sci. Results. Editors SuessE.von HueneR., 112, 413–440, Ocean Drilling Program, College Station, TX.10.2973/odp.proc.sr.112.144.1990
43
KatzA.Ben-YaakovS. (1980). Diffusion of Seawater Ions. Part II. The Role of Activity Coefficients and Ion Pairing. Mar. Chem.8, 263–280. 10.1016/0304-4203(80)90016-x
44
KeltsK.McKenzieJ. A. (1984). “A Comparison of Anoxic Dolomite from Deep-Sea Sediments: Quaternary Gulf of California and Messinian Tripoli Formation of Sicily,” in Dolomites Of the Monterey Formation And Other Organic-Rich Units. Editors GarrisonR. E.KastnerM.ZengerD. H. (Los Angeles, CA: Pacific Section SEPM), 41, 19–28.
45
KnabN. J.DaleA. W.LettmannK.FossingH.JørgensenB. B. (2008). Thermodynamic and Kinetic Control on Anaerobic Oxidation of Methane in marine Sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta72, 3746–3757. 10.1016/j.gca.2008.05.039
46
KowalewskiM.RimstidtJ. D. (2003). Average Lifetime and Age Spectra of Detrital Grains: toward a Unifying Theory of Sedimentary Particles. J. Geology.111, 427–439. 10.1086/375284
47
KruminsV.GehlenM.ArndtS.Van CappellenP.RegnierP. (2013). Dissolved Inorganic Carbon and Alkalinity Fluxes from Coastal marine Sediments: Model Estimates for Different Shelf Environments and Sensitivity to Global Change. Biogeosciences10, 371–398. 10.5194/bg-10-371-2013
48
KutvonenH.RajalaP.CarpénL.BombergM. (2015). Nitrate and Ammonia as Nitrogen Sources for Deep Subsurface Microorganisms. Front. Microbiol.6, 1079. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01079
49
LasagaA. C. (1998). Kinetic Theory in the Earth Sciences. Princeton Series in Geochemistry. Princeton, Chichester: Princeton University Press, 811.
50
LoydS. J.CorsettiF. A.EilerJ. M.TripatiA. K. (2012). Determining the Diagenetic Conditions of Concretion Formation: Assessing Temperatures and Pore Waters Using Clumped Isotopes. J. Sediment. Res.82, 1006–1016. 10.2110/jsr.2012.85
51
LyleM.KoizumiI.RichterC.Shipboard Scientific Party (1997). Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program. Initial Rep.167, 353–387. 10.2973/odp.proc.ir.167.113.1997
52
MarinoniL.SettiM.SalviC.López-GalindoA. (2008). Clay Minerals in Late Quaternary Sediments from the South Chilean Margin as Indicators of Provenance and Palaeoclimate. Clay miner.43, 235–253. 10.1180/claymin.2008.043.2.07
53
MatmonD.BekinsB. A. (2006). Hydromechanics of a High Taper Angle, Low-Permeability Prism: A Case Study from Peru. J. Geophys. Res.111, B07101. 10.1029/2005JB003697
54
MavromatisV.MeisterP.OelkersE. H. (2015). Using Stable Mg Isotopes to Distinguish Dolomite Formation Mechanisms: A Case Study from the Peru Margin. Chem. Geology.385, 84–91.
55
MeisterP.BrunnerB.PicardA.BöttcherM. E.JørgensenB. B. (2019a). Sulphur and Carbon Isotopes as Tracers of Past Sub-seafloor Microbial Activity. Sci. Rep.9 (604), 604–609. 10.1038/s41598-018-36943-7
56
MeisterP.ChapliginB.PicardA.MeyerH.FischerC.RettenwanderD.et al (2014). Early Diagenetic Quartz Formation at a Deep Iron Oxidation Front in the Eastern Equatorial Pacific - A Modern Analogue for Banded Iron/chert Formations?Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta137, 188–207. 10.1016/j.gca.2014.03.035
57
MeisterP. (2015). For the Deep Biosphere, the Present Is Not Always the Key to the Past: what We Can Learn from the Geological Record. Terra Nova27, 400–408. 10.1111/ter.12174
58
MeisterP.GutjahrM.FrankM.BernasconiS. M.VasconcelosC.McKenzieJ. A. (2011). Dolomite Formation within the Methanogenic Zone Induced by Tectonically Driven Fluids in the Peru Accretionary Prism. Geology39, 563–566. 10.1130/g31810.1
59
MeisterP.LiuB.FerdelmanT. G.JørgensenB. B.KhaliliA. (2013). Control of Sulphate and Methane Distributions in marine Sediments by Organic Matter Reactivity. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta104, 183–193. 10.1016/j.gca.2012.11.011
60
MeisterP.LiuB.KhaliliA.BöttcherM. E.JørgensenB. B. (2019b). Factors Controlling the Carbon Isotope Composition of Dissolved Inorganic Carbon and Methane in marine Porewater: An Evaluation by Reaction-Transport Modelling. J. Mar. Syst.200, 1032271–1032318. 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2019.103227
61
MeisterP.McKenzieJ. A.VasconcelosC.BernasconiS.FrankM.GutjahrM.et al (2007). Dolomite Formation in the Dynamic Deep Biosphere: Results from the Peru Margin. Sedimentology54, 1007–1032. 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2007.00870.x
62
MeisterP.McKenzieJ. A.WarthmannR.VasconcelosC. (2006). “Mineralogy and Petrography of Diagenetic Dolomite, Peru Margin, ODP Leg 201,” in Proc. ODP, Sci. Results. Editors JørgensenB. B.D’HondtS. L.MillerD. J., 1–34. 10.2973/odp.proc.sr.201.102.2006
63
MeisterP.ProkopenkoM.SkilbeckC. G.WatsonM.McKenzieJ. A. (2005). “Data Report: Compilation of Total Organic and Inorganic Carbon Data from Peru Margin and Eastern Equatorial Pacific Drill Sites (ODP Legs 112, 138, and 201),” in Proc. ODP, Sci. Results. Editors JørgensenB. B.D’HondtS. L.MillerD. J., 201. 10.2973/odp.proc.sr.201.105.2005
64
MeisterP.ReyesC. (2019). “The Carbon-Isotope Record of the Sub-seafloor Biosphere,” in Tracking the Deep Biosphere through Time. Editors DrakeH.IvarssonM.HeimC., 9, 1–25. 10.3390/geosciences9120507
65
MeisterP. (2013). Two Opposing Effects of Sulfate Reduction on Carbonate Precipitation in normal marine, Hypersaline, and Alkaline Environments. Geology41, 499–502. 10.1130/g34185.1
66
MeisterP. (2014). Two Opposing Effects of Sulfate Reduction on Carbonate Precipitation in normal marine, Hypersaline, and Alkaline Environments: Reply. Geology42, e315. 10.1130/g35240y.1
67
MichalopoulosP.AllerR. C. (1995). Rapid Clay Mineral Formation in Amazon Delta Sediments: Reverse Weathering and Oceanic Elemental Cycles. Science270, 614–617. 10.1126/science.270.5236.614
68
MiddelburgJ. J.SoetaertK.HagensM. (2020). Ocean Alkalinity, Buffering and Biogeochemical Processes. Rev. Geophys.58, e2019RG000681. 10.1029/2019RG000681
69
MooreD. M.ReynoldsR. C. (1997). X-ray Diffraction and the Identification and Analysis of clay Minerals. 2nd ed.Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
70
MooreT. S.MurrayR. W.KurtzA. C.SchragD. P. (2004)., 229. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V., 141–154. 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.10.015Anaerobic Methane Oxidation and the Formation of DolomiteEarth Planet. Sci. Lett.
71
MorseJ. W.ArvidsonR. S.LüttgeA. (2007). Calcium Carbonate Formation and Dissolution. Chem. Rev.107, 342–381. 10.1021/cr050358j
72
MozleyP. S.BurnsS. J. (1993). Oxygen and Carbon Isotopic Composition of marine Carbonate Concretions – an Overview. J. Sediment. Petrol.63, 73–83.
73
MurataK. J.FriedmanI.MadsenB. H. (1969). Isotopic Composition of Diagenetic Carbonates in Marine Miocene Formations of California and Oregon. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office614-B, 1–24. 10.3133/pp614B
74
MurrayR. W.WigleyR.Shipboard Scientific Party (1998). Interstitial Water Chemistry of Deeply Buried Sediments from the Southwest African Margin: A Preliminary Synthesis of Results from Leg 175. Proc. Ocean Drill. Prog. Initial Rep.175, 547–553. 10.2973/odp.proc.ir.175.120.1998
75
NauhausK.BoetiusA.KrügerM.WiddelF. (1995). In Vitro demonstration of Anaerobic Oxidation of Methane Coupled to Sulphate Reduction in Sediment from a marine Gas Hydrate Area. Environ. Microbiol.4, 296–305. 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00299.x
76
OckertC.WehrmannL. M.KaufholdS.FerdelmanT. G.TeichertB. M. A.GussoneN. (2014). Calcium-ammonium Exchange Experiments on clay Minerals Using a45Ca Tracer Technique in marine Pore Water. Isotopes Environ. Health Stud.50, 1–17. 10.1080/10256016.2013.806505
77
ParkY. K.LeeJ. I.JungJ.HillenbrandC.-D.YooK.-C.KimJ. (2019). Elemental Compositions of Smectites Reveal Detailed Sediment Provenance Changes during Glacial and Interglacial Periods: the Southern Drake Passage and Bellingshausen Sea, Antarctica. Minerals9 (322), 1–14. 10.3390/min9050322
78
ParkesR. J.WebsterG.CraggB. A.WeightmanA. J.NewberryC. J.FerdelmanT. G.et al (2005). Deep Sub-seafloor Prokaryotes Stimulated at Interfaces over Geological Time. Nature436, 390–394. 10.1038/nature03796
79
ParkhurstD.AppeloC. (2013). Description of Input and Examples for PHREEQC Version 3—A Computer Program for Speciation, Batch-Reaction, One-Dimensional Transport, and Inverse Geochemical Calculations. U.S. Geol. Surv. Tech. Methods6-A43, 497.
80
ParkhurstD. L.WissmeierL. (2015). PhreeqcRM: A Reaction Module for Transport Simulators Based on the Geochemical Model PHREEQC. Adv. Water Resour.83, 176–189. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.06.001
81
PaullC. K.MatsumotoR.WallaceP. J.Shipboard Scientific Party (1996). Gas Hydrate Sampling on the Blake Ridge and Carolina Rise Proc. ODP, Init. Repts. 164. College Station, TX: Ocean Drilling Program. 10.2973/odp.proc.ir.164.1996
82
PisciottoK. H.MahoneyJ. J. (1981). Isotopic Survey of Diagenetic Carbonates, Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 63. Drilling Project63, 595–609. 10.2973/dsdp.proc.63.118.1981
83
ProkopenkoM. G.HammondD. E.SpivackA. J.StottL. D. (2006). Sediment and Pore Water C and N Composition of ODP Holes 201-1227A, 201–1230A. 10.1594/PANGAEA.773410
84
RaiswellR.FisherQ. J. (2000). Mudrock‐hosted Carbonate Concretions: a Review of Growth Mechanisms and Their Influence on Chemical and Isotopic Composition. J. Geol. Soc.157, 239–251. 10.1144/jgs.157.1.239
85
RodriguezN. M.PaullC. K.BorowskiW. S. (2000). “Zonation of Authigenic Carbonates within Gas Hydrate-Bearing Sedimentary Sections on the Blake ridge: Offshore southeastern North America,” in Proc. ODP, Sci. Results. Editors PaullC. K.MatsumotoR.WallaceP. J.DillonW. P.College Station, TX: Ocean Drilling Program, 164, 301–312. 10.2973/odp.proc.sr.164.227.2000
86
ScholzF.HensenC.SchmidtM.GeersenJ. (2013). Submarine Weathering of Silicate Minerals and the Extent of Pore Water Freshening at Active continental Margins. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta100, 200–216. 10.1016/j.gca.2012.09.043
87
SchragD. P.HigginsJ. A.MacdonaldF. A.JohnstonD. T. (2013). Authigenic Carbonate and the History of the Global Carbon Cycle. Science339, 540–543. 10.1126/science.1229578
88
SmithD. C. (2005). “Data Report: Dissolved Organic Carbon in Interstitial Waters, Equatorial Pacific and Peru Margin, ODP Leg 201,” in Proc. ODP, Sci. Results 201. Editors JørgensenB. B.D’HondtS. L.MillerD. J.. 10.2973/odp.proc.sr.201.111.2005
89
SoetaertK.HofmannA. F.MiddleburgJ. J.MeysmanF. J. R.GreenwoodJ. (2007). The Effect of Biogeochemical Processes on pH. Marine Chem.105, 30–51. 10.1016/j.marchem.2006.12.012
90
SolomonE. A.SpivackA. J.KastnerM.TorresM. E.RobertsonG. (2014). Gas Hydrate Distribution and Carbon Sequestration Through Coupled Microbial Methanogenesis and Silicate Weathering in the Krishna–Godavari Basin, Offshore India. Marine Petrol. Geol.58, 233–253. 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.08.020
91
SpivackA. J.McNeilC.HolmN. G.HinrichsK.-U. (2006). “Determination of In Situ Methane Based on Analysis of Void Gas,” in Proc. ODP, Sci. Results. Editors JørgensenB. B.D’HondtS. L.MillerD. J., 1–11. 10.2973/odp.proc.sr.201.119.2006
92
SuessE. (1988). Peru continental Margin. Proc. ODP, Init. Repts. College Station, TX: Ocean Drilling Program.
93
SunX.TurchynA. V. (2014). Significant Contribution of Authigenic Carbonate to marine Carbon Burial. Nat. Geosci7, 201–204. 10.1038/ngeo2070
94
TadaR.MurrayR. W.Alvarez ZarikianC. A.Expedition 346 Scientists (2015). Site U1426. Proc. Integr. Ocean Drill. Prog.346, 1–113. 10.2204/iodp.proc.346.107.2015
95
TarpgaardI. H.JørgensenB. B.KjeldsenK. U.KjeldsenK. U.RøyH. (2017). The marine Sulfate Reducer Desulfobacterium Autotrophicum HRM2 Can Switch between Low and High Apparent Half-Saturation Constants for Dissimilatory Sulfate Reduction. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.93, 12. 10.1093/femsec/fix012
96
ThornburgT. M.SuessE. (1992). “Carbonate Cementation of Granular and Fracture Porosity: Implications for the Cenozoic Hydrologic Development of the Peru Continental Margin,” in Proc. ODP, Sci. Results. Editor SuessM., 112, 95–109.
97
TishchenkoP.HensenC.WallmannK.WongC. S. (2005). Calculation of the Stability and Solubility of Methane Hydrate in Seawater. Chem. Geology.219, 37–52. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.02.008
98
TréhuA. M.BohrmannG.RackF. R.TorresM. E.Shipboard Scientific Party (2003). “Drilling Gas Hydrates on Hydrate Ridge, Cascadia Continental Margin,” in Proc. ODP, Init. Repts. (College Station, TX: Ocean Drilling Program), 1–75.
99
TreudeT.BoetiusA.KnittelK.WallmannK.Barker JørgensenB. (2003). Anaerobic Oxidation of Methane above Gas Hydrates at Hydrate Ridge, NE Pacific Ocean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.264, 1–14. 10.3354/meps264001
100
UsslerW.PaullC. K. (2008). Rates of Anaerobic Oxidation of Methane and Authigenic Carbonate Mineralization in Methane-Rich Deep-Sea Sediments Inferred from Models and Geochemical Profiles. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.266, 271–287. 10.1016/j.epsl.2007.10.056
101
Van CappellenP. (1996). Reactive Surface Area Control of the Dissolution Kinetics of Biogenic Silica in Deep-Sea Sediments. Chem. Geology.132, 125–130. 10.1016/s0009-2541(96)00047-2
102
Von BreymannM. T.CollierR.SuessE. (1990). Magnesium Adsorption and Ion Exchange in marine Sediments: a Multi-Component Model. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta54, 3295–3313. 10.1016/0016-7037(90)90286-t
103
WallmannK.AloisiG.HaeckelM.TishchenkoP.PavlovaG.GreinertJ.et al (2008). Silicate Weathering in Anoxic marine Sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 72, 3067–3090. 10.1016/j.gca.2008.03.026
104
WangG.SpivackA. J.RutherfordS.ManorU.D’HondtS. (2008). Quantification of Co-occurring Reaction Rates in Deep Subseafloor Sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta72, 3479–3488. 10.1016/j.gca.2008.04.024
105
WeferG.BergerW. H.RichterC.Shipboard Scientific Party (1998). “Benguela Current,” in Proc. ODP, Init. Repts. 175 (College Station, TX: Ocean Drilling Program). 10.2973/odp.proc.ir.175.1998
106
WehrmannL. M.OckertC.MixA. C.GussoneN.TeichertB. M. A.MeisterP. (2016). Repeated Occurrences of Methanogenic Zones, Diagenetic Dolomite Formation and Linked Silicate Alteration in Southern Bering Sea Sediments (Bowers Ridge, IODP Exp. 323 Site U1341). Deep Sea Res. Part II125–126, 117–132. 10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.09.008
107
WehrmannL. M.KnabN. J.PirletH.UnnithanV.WildC.FerdelmanT. G. (2009). Carbon Mineralization and Carbonate Preservation in Modern Cold-Water Coral Reef Sediments on the Norwegian Shelf. Biogeosciences6, 663–680. 10.5194/bg-6-663-2009
108
Wolf-GladrowD. A.ZeebeR. E.KlaasC.KörtzingerA.DicksonA. G. (2007). Total Alkalinity: the Explicit Conservative Expression and its Application to Biogeochemical Processes. Mar. Chem.106, 287–300. 10.1016/j.marchem.2007.01.006
109
ZeebeR. E. (2007). Modeling CO2 Chemistry, δ13C, and Oxidation of Organic Carbon and Methane in Sediment Porewater: Implications for Paleo-Proxies in Benthic Foraminifera. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta71, 3238–3256. 10.1016/j.gca.2007.05.004
Summary
Keywords
alkalinity, microbial activity, methanogenesis, silicate alteration, clay minerals, diagenetic carbonate, Peru margin
Citation
Meister P, Herda G, Petrishcheva E, Gier S, Dickens GR, Bauer C and Liu B (2022) Microbial Alkalinity Production and Silicate Alteration in Methane Charged Marine Sediments: Implications for Porewater Chemistry and Diagenetic Carbonate Formation. Front. Earth Sci. 9:756591. doi: 10.3389/feart.2021.756591
Received
10 August 2021
Accepted
24 November 2021
Published
17 January 2022
Volume
9 - 2021
Edited by
Laura M. Wehrmann, Stony Brook University, United States
Reviewed by
Xiaole Sun, Stockholm University, Sweden
William Patrick Gilhooly, Indiana University—Purdue University Indianapolis, United States
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2022 Meister, Herda, Petrishcheva, Gier, Dickens, Bauer and Liu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Patrick Meister, patrick.meister@univie.ac.at; Susanne Gier, susanne.gier@univie.ac.at
This article was submitted to Biogeoscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Earth Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.