AUTHOR=Cho Ki Hwan , Park Jeong-Soo , Kim Ji Hyung , Kwon Yong Sung , Lee Do-Hun 

TITLE=Modeling the distribution of invasive species (Ambrosia spp.) using regression kriging and Maxent

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

VOLUME=Volume 10 - 2022

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2022.1036816

DOI=10.3389/fevo.2022.1036816

ISSN=2296-701X

ABSTRACT=Invasion by non-native species due to human activities is a major threat to biodiversity. For invasive species that rapidly spread and disturb ecosystems, the niche hypothesis is easily eroded by eradication activities or unsaturated dispersal. Here, we modeled the distribution of two invasive plant species that are widely distributed but are also being actively eradicated using spatial and non-spatial models. Regression kriging and Maxent were used to predict the spatial distribution of Ambrosia artemisiifolia and A. trifida; both have had eradication targets for decades in South Korea. A total of 1,478 presence/absence data points in the Seoul metropolitan area (~11,000 km2 in north-eastern South Korea) were used. For regression kriging, the presence/absence data were first fitted with environmental covariates using a generalized linear model (GLM), and then the residuals of the GLM were modeled using ordinary kriging. The residuals of GLM showed significant spatial autocorrelation. The spatial autocorrelation was modeled using kriging. Regression kriging, which considers the spatial structure of data, yielded area under the receiver operating curve values of 0.785 and 0.775 for A. artemisiifolia and A. trifida, respectively. However, the values of Maxent, a non-spatial model, were 0.619 and 0.622. Thus, regression kriging was advantageous as it considers the spatial autocorrelation of the data. Species distribution modeling encounters difficulties when the current species distribution does not reflect optimal habitat conditions (the niche habitat preferences) or the colonization is disturbed by artificial interference (e.g., removal activity). This greatly reduces the predictive power of the model if the model is based solely on niche hypotheses that do not reflect reality. Managers can take advantage of regression modeling when modeling species distributions under conditions unfavorable to the niche hypothesis.