Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Ecol. Evol.
Sec. Population, Community, and Ecosystem Dynamics
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fevo.2024.1392652
This article is part of the Research Topic Advances in Reconstructing Biotic and Abiotic Interactions in Forest Ecosystems, Volume II View all 6 articles

Persistence, changes and robustness of nest webs along a latitudinal gradient in the Canadian boreal forest

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Centre d'étude de la forêt, Montréal, Canada
  • 2 Chaire en aménagement forestier durable UQAT-UQAM, Montreal, Ontario, Canada
  • 3 Départment des Sciences Biologiques, Faculté des sciences, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    In eastern Canada, the boreal forest is associated with an important latitudinal shift in forest composition and structure, which occurs in the transition between the mixed southern and the coniferous northern boreal forest. Along this transition, upland mixedwood stands with large deciduous trees (important for cavity-dependent vertebrate species) are gradually replaced by forests with smaller conifer trees, primarily black spruce (Picea mariana). Concomitantly, the availability of lowland forests flooded by the American beaver (Castor canadensis), which can provide adequate conditions for cavity users, is also decreasing. We hypothesized that this latitudinal gradient would bring changes in the functional diversity and network structure of vertebrate cavity-using communities. Along this latitudinal gradient we used a nest web approach to analyze the structure and robustness of networks of cavity users in upland forests and in lowland forests flooded by beavers. Despite their low availability in the northern forest region, we found that mixedwood stands persisted throughout the boreal forest in being the main drivers of nest webs network structure of upland forests whereas old black spruce stands contribution was low. In lowland forests, beaver ponds harbored nest webs with a rich and complex structure in both forest regions. Species removal simulations revealed that across our latitudinal gradient upland and lowland forest nest webs responded differently. In upland forests, the removal of trembling aspen and the Pileated Woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus) caused the highest proportions of secondary extinctions, showing low robustness of nest webs given that these two species were highly connected to the other species. Contrastingly, nest webs in beaver ponds were more robust mainly because excavator species used a higher diversity of tree species despite the removal of the Northern Flicker (Colaptes auratus) which induced numerous secondary extinctions. The Pileated Woodpecker remained the pivotal species across the two forest regions in upland forests whereas the Northern Flicker became the main large cavity provider in beaver ponds across the latitudinal gradient. We discuss how mixedwood forests and beaver ponds, which are key habitat types for the cavity-using vertebrate community across our latitudinal gradient, should be maintained and protected in landscapes under industrial timber harvesting.

    Keywords: upland mixedwood forests, upland conifer forests, Beaver ponds, cavity-using vertebrate communities, Nest webs, Lowland forests, boreal forests

    Received: 29 Feb 2024; Accepted: 25 Jun 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Cadieux, Drapeau, Fouillet and Deschênes. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Pierre Drapeau, Centre d'étude de la forêt, Montréal, Canada

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.